DOCSLIB.ORG

(Non)Implementation of the Agreement of the Governments Relating to the South of Serbia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(Non)Implementation of the Agreement of the Governments Relating to the South of Serbia (NON)IMPLEMENTATION OF THE AGREEMENT OF THE GOVERNMENTS RELATING TO THE SOUTH OF SERBIA Publisher: The Council for Human Rights - Bujanovac Author: Belgzim Kamberi Researchers: Enkel Rexhepi Agon Islami Text, Layout and Design Production: Idea digital, Vranje Printing: Idea digital, Vranje Circulation: 350 Bujanovac, May 2016 This analysis is part of the project “Stregthening Stability in South Serbia through Integration of the Albanian National Minority”, implemented by the Council for Human Rights in Bujanovac. The views herein expressed are solely those of the author and do not reflect the position of the Federal Department of Foreign Affairs of Switzerland and Open Society Foundation – Belgrade. This Project is funded by the Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs and Open Society Foundation – Belgrade. 2 | P a g e Content INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 5 ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................................ 6 I GENERAL INFORMATION.................................................................................................. 7 1. Geographic Data on Municipalities Bujanovac, Presevo and Medvedja ........................ 7 1.1. Bujanovac ................................................................................................................ 7 1.2. Presevo..................................................................................................................... 7 1.3. Medvedja ................................................................................................................. 7 2. Population of Presevo, Bujanovac and Medvedja .......................................................... 8 2.1. “The Great Census” of 2002 .................................................................................... 8 2.2. “Illegitimate” Legal Census of 2011 ....................................................................... 9 2.3. “Assessed” Census of 2015 ................................................................................... 12 II Rights of Minorities in Serbia .............................................................................................. 13 1. Legal Framework that Regulates Rights of Minorities ................................................. 13 1.1. Law on the Protection of Rights and Freedoms of National Minorities ................ 14 1.2. Constitutional Norms for Minority Rights ............................................................ 14 III Special Obligations of the Republic of Serbia towards Municipalities of Presevo, Bujanovac and Medvedja ......................................................................................................... 16 1. Obligations Envisaged by the Plan and Program for Resolution of the Crisis in Municipalities of Bujanovac, Presevo and Medvedja.......................................................... 16 1.1. Program Objectives and Deadlines ........................................................................ 16 2. Obligations envisaged by the Agreement on Principles for Reconstruction of the Coordination Body ............................................................................................................... 17 2.1. Agreement Objectives and Deadlines .................................................................... 18 2.2. Obligations Envisaged by the “Seven Points Plan” ............................................... 19 2.3. The Agreement Objectives and Deadlines ............................................................ 19 3. Blocked Process – Census and Judicial Reform ........................................................... 20 3.1. Problem of census boycott ..................................................................................... 20 3.2. Judicial Reform...................................................................................................... 22 IV (NON)IMPLEMENTATION ............................................................................................. 23 1. Representation/Integration in the Government Institutions .......................................... 23 1.1. Integration in Public Institutions and Services ...................................................... 24 1.2. Local State Institutions .......................................................................................... 27 1.3. Republic and County Institutions .......................................................................... 29 2. Economic Recovery ...................................................................................................... 32 2.1. Unemployment ...................................................................................................... 32 2.2. Subsidies to Private Companies ............................................................................ 33 3. Investments – Coordination Body for Municipalities Bujanovac, Presevo and Medvedja.............................................................................................................................. 34 3.1. Infrastructure (reconstruction and asphalting of roads, construction and reconstruction of school and healthcare facilities, water supply, rehabilitation of landslides, sewage) .......................................................................................................... 35 3 | P a g e 3.2. Social Welfare Benefits (one-off social aids, assistance in case of natural disasters, scholarships, school supplies) .......................................................................... 35 3.3. Non-Refundable Funds for Subsidies .................................................................... 35 3.4. Donations (awarding funds at competition for NGO projects and media) ............ 35 4. Official Use of Language, Letter and National Symbols .............................................. 35 4.1. Official Use of Language ...................................................................................... 35 4.2. Official Use of Scripts ........................................................................................... 36 4.3. Official Use of National Symbol ........................................................................... 38 5. Judicial System ............................................................................................................. 38 5.1. Law on Amnesty .................................................................................................... 38 5.2. Facing the Past and (Non)Trust of Albanian National Minority in Judicial System ............................................................................................................................. 39 5.3. Decentralization of Judicial System ...................................................................... 39 6. Education, Culture and Media ......................................................................................... 40 6.1. Education .................................................................................................................. 40 6.2. High Education in Albanian Language ................................................................. 44 6.3. Culture....................................................................................................................... 46 6.3. Media in Albanian Language ................................................................................ 49 7. Healthcare and Social Protection .................................................................................. 50 7.1. Outpatient Maternity Ward .................................................................................... 50 8. Security ......................................................................................................................... 51 8.1. Withdrawal of Exceptionally Engaged Special Military and Police Forces ......... 51 8.2. (Non) Return of Displaced Population .................................................................. 51 8.3. Opening Small Border Crossings .......................................................................... 52 CONCLUSION AND RECOMANADATION ....................................................................... 53 ANNEXES ............................................................................................................................... 55 BIBLIOGRAPHY .................................................................................................................... 65 4 | P a g e INTRODUCTION * Exactly fifteen years will be completed soon since the “Declaration on Demilitarization” of the Liberation Army of Presevo, Bujanovac and Medvedja (UCPBM), known as the “Konculj Agreement”, had been signed. This paved way for implementation of the “Plan and Program for Resolution of the Crisis in Municipalities of Bujanovac, Presevo and Medvedja”, called the “Covic’s Plan”. In the meantime, other two agreements followed, one relating to reconstruction of the Coordination Body of the Government of the Republic of Serbia for the municipalities of Presevo, Bujanovac and Medvedja, and the other so called “Seven Points Plan”. They include measures that mostly refer to integration of Albanians into political, governmental and social system and respect of their human rights in accordance with European standards; establishment of safety and peace in the region; economic and social revitalization of the region
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Republic of Serbia Ipard Programme for 2014-2020
    EN ANNEX Ministry of Agriculture and Environmental Protection Republic of Serbia REPUBLIC OF SERBIA IPARD PROGRAMME FOR 2014-2020 27th June 2019 1 List of Abbreviations AI - Artificial Insemination APSFR - Areas with Potential Significant Flood Risk APV - The Autonomous Province of Vojvodina ASRoS - Agricultural Strategy of the Republic of Serbia AWU - Annual work unit CAO - Competent Accrediting Officer CAP - Common Agricultural Policy CARDS - Community Assistance for Reconstruction, Development and Stabilisation CAS - Country Assistance Strategy CBC - Cross border cooperation CEFTA - Central European Free Trade Agreement CGAP - Code of Good Agricultural Practices CHP - Combined Heat and Power CSF - Classical swine fever CSP - Country Strategy Paper DAP - Directorate for Agrarian Payment DNRL - Directorate for National Reference Laboratories DREPR - Danube River Enterprise Pollution Reduction DTD - Dunav-Tisa-Dunav Channel EAR - European Agency for Reconstruction EC - European Commission EEC - European Economic Community EU - European Union EUROP grid - Method of carcass classification F&V - Fruits and Vegetables FADN - Farm Accountancy Data Network FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization FAVS - Area of forest available for wood supply FOWL - Forest and other wooded land FVO - Food Veterinary Office FWA - Framework Agreement FWC - Framework Contract GAEC - Good agriculture and environmental condition GAP - Gross Agricultural Production GDP - Gross Domestic Product GEF - Global Environment Facility GEF - Global Environment Facility GES
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Program and Plan for The
    PROGRAM AND PLAN FOR THE SOLUTION OF THE CRISIS IN PRESEVO, BUJANOVAC AND MEDVEDJA MUNICIPALITIES Annex 5: Agreement on the solution of the crisis in Bujanovac, Presevo and Medvedja municipalities This Agreement is concluded between: The Governments of the Republic of Serbia and of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and The Albanian ethnic community in the municipalities of Presevo, Bujanovac and Medvedja. The implementation of this Agreement is supported and in the framework of the Joint Commission guaranteed by the international community, under the auspices of the United Nations. 1. The subject of this Agreement is the solution of the crisis in the municipalities of Presevo, Bujanovac, and Medvedja, in a peaceful way. 2. The Parties to the Agreement agree that the common objectives for the solution of the crisis are: a) The establishment of the respect of the constitutional-legal order, i.e. of the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Republic of Serbia and of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia on that part of their territory, and the assurance of full normalization of work of the organs of the state, of the organs of local self-government and of other legal organs in that territory; b) The establishment of full personal security and security of property of all citizens and of full and undisturbed freedom of their movement in all parts of the territory of these municipalities, which shall be assured by the complete disbanding and disarmament of the extremists, by the restoration of security and peace in the region, and by making possible the return of all citizens - refugees to their households; c) The development of multiethnic and multiconfessional society based on democratic principles with the respect of all human, political and minority rights and liberties according to the highest standards; d) Prosperous and rapid economic and social development of the region with international financial assistance in the best interest of all citizens who live in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Spisak Studenata Koji Su Dobili Jednokratnu
    SPISAK STUDENATA KOJI SU DOBILI JEDNOKRATNU NOVČANU POMOĆ AKADEMSKE 2017/2018 GODINE LISTA E STUDENTËVE QË KANË PËRFITUAR NDIHMËN E NJËHERSHME FINANCIARE NË VITIN AKADEMIK 2017/2018 I GODINA-VITI I I Red.br. Ime i prezime studenta Naziv fakulteta Sedište fakulteta Mesto stanovanja Prosek Iznos Nr.rend. Emri dhe mbiemri i studentit Fakulteti Selia e fakultetit Vendbanimi ocean jednokr. nov. Nota mes. pomoći za akademsku 2017/2018 Shuma e ndih.se njeh.vit.akade mik 2017/2018 1. Anđelija Stojanović Fakultet tehničkih nauka Novi Sad Bujanovac 5.00 12.000,00 Fak.i shkencave teknike Bujanoc 2. Ljndrita Redžepi Medicinski fakultet Priština Bujanovac 5.00 12.000,00 Fak.i mjekësisë Prishtinë Bujanoc 3. Tijana Kostić PMF Novi Sad Bujanovac 5.00 12.000,00 F.M.N. Bujanoc 4. Ganuše Rašiti Medicinski fakultet Tirana V. Trnovac 5.00 12.000,00 Fak.i mjekësisë Tiranë Tërnoc 5. Aleksandra Jordanović Fakultet tehničkih nauka Novi Sad Baraljevac 5.00 12.000,00 Fak.i shkencave teknike Baralevc 6. Sara Bećiri Farmaceutski fakultet Turska Bujanovac 5.00 12.000,00 Fak.i farmacisë Turqi Bujanoc 7. Stanislava Pešić Ekonomski fakultet Niš Bujan. Banja 5.00 12.000,00 Fak.ekonomik Nish Banj.Bujanocit 8. Vesa Aćifi Ekonomski fakultet Turska Nesalce 5.00 12.000,00 Fak.ekonomik Turqi Nasalcë 9. Nikolija Stojanović Građevinsko-arhitektonski Niš Bujanovac 5.00 12.000,00 Fak.ndërtim.-arkitekt. Nish Bujanoc 10. Saud Asani Medicinski fakultet Priština V. Trnovac 5.00 12.000,00 Fak.i mjekësisë Tërnoc 11. Anđela Nakić Ekonomski fakultet Niš Rakovac 5.00 12.000,00 Fak.ekonomik 1 12.
    [Show full text]
  • UNDER ORDERS: War Crimes in Kosovo Order Online
    UNDER ORDERS: War Crimes in Kosovo Order online Table of Contents Acknowledgments Introduction Glossary 1. Executive Summary The 1999 Offensive The Chain of Command The War Crimes Tribunal Abuses by the KLA Role of the International Community 2. Background Introduction Brief History of the Kosovo Conflict Kosovo in the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia Kosovo in the 1990s The 1998 Armed Conflict Conclusion 3. Forces of the Conflict Forces of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia Yugoslav Army Serbian Ministry of Internal Affairs Paramilitaries Chain of Command and Superior Responsibility Stucture and Strategy of the KLA Appendix: Post-War Promotions of Serbian Police and Yugoslav Army Members 4. march–june 1999: An Overview The Geography of Abuses The Killings Death Toll,the Missing and Body Removal Targeted Killings Rape and Sexual Assault Forced Expulsions Arbitrary Arrests and Detentions Destruction of Civilian Property and Mosques Contamination of Water Wells Robbery and Extortion Detentions and Compulsory Labor 1 Human Shields Landmines 5. Drenica Region Izbica Rezala Poklek Staro Cikatovo The April 30 Offensive Vrbovac Stutica Baks The Cirez Mosque The Shavarina Mine Detention and Interrogation in Glogovac Detention and Compusory Labor Glogovac Town Killing of Civilians Detention and Abuse Forced Expulsion 6. Djakovica Municipality Djakovica City Phase One—March 24 to April 2 Phase Two—March 7 to March 13 The Withdrawal Meja Motives: Five Policeman Killed Perpetrators Korenica 7. Istok Municipality Dubrava Prison The Prison The NATO Bombing The Massacre The Exhumations Perpetrators 8. Lipljan Municipality Slovinje Perpetrators 9. Orahovac Municipality Pusto Selo 10. Pec Municipality Pec City The “Cleansing” Looting and Burning A Final Killing Rape Cuska Background The Killings The Attacks in Pavljan and Zahac The Perpetrators Ljubenic 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnic Cleansing in the Balkans
    CICERO FOUNDATION GREAT DEBATE PAPER No. 13 / 04 November 2013 ETHNIC CLEANSING IN THE BALKANS WHY DID IT HAPPEN AND COULD IT HAPPEN AGAIN? PAUL MOJZES Rosemont College Rosemont, Pennsylvania, U.S.A. Cicero Foundation Great Debate Paper No. 13/04 © Paul Mojzes, 2013 All rights reserved The Cicero Foundation is an independent pro-Atlantic and pro-EU think tank. www.cicerofoundation.org The views expressed in Cicero Foundation Great Debate Papers do not necessarily express the opinion of the Cicero Foundation, but they are considered interesting and thought-provoking enough to be published. Permission to make digital or hard copies of any information contained in these web publications is granted for personal use, without fee and without formal request. Full citation and copyright notice must appear on the first page. Copies may not be made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage. The Cicero Foundation FRANCE THE NETHERLANDS 13, rue Washington Hondertmarck D 45 75008 PARIS 6211 MB MAASTRICHT Tel. +33 1 45 62 05 90 Tel. +31 43 32 60 602 Fax +33 1 45 62 05 30 Fax +31 43 32 60 828 Email [email protected] [email protected] 2 Ethnic Cleansing in the Balkans: Why Did It Happen And Could It Happen Again? Paul Mojzes Introduction In the writing of my book, Balkan Genocides: Holocaust and Ethnic Cleansing in the Twentieth Century ,(1) among the many definitions of genocide, I followed the formally adopted definition of the 1948 United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. This definition was my primary guide in determining which of the many conflicts in the Balkans during the 20th Century were genocidal.
    [Show full text]
  • The Western Balkans
    House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee The Western Balkans Third Report of Session 2004–05 Report, together with formal minutes Volume I Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 1 February 2005 HC 87-I Published on 23 February 2004 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £14.50 The Foreign Affairs Committee The Foreign Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and its associated public bodies. Current membership Rt Hon Donald Anderson MP (Labour, Swansea East) (Chairman) Mr David Chidgey MP (Liberal Democrat, Eastleigh) Mr Fabian Hamilton MP (Labour, Leeds North East) Mr Eric Illsley MP (Labour, Barnsley Central) Rt Hon Andrew Mackay (Conservative, Bracknell) Andrew Mackinlay MP (Labour, Thurrock) Mr John Maples MP (Conservative, Stratford-on-Avon) Mr Bill Olner MP (Labour, Nuneaton) Mr Greg Pope MP (Labour, Hyndburn) Rt Hon Sir John Stanley MP (Conservative, Tonbridge and Malling) Ms Gisela Stuart MP (Labour, Birmingham Edgbaston) The following Members were also members of the Committee during the Parliament. Sir Patrick Cormack MP (Conservative, Staffordshire South) Richard Ottaway (Conservative, Croydon South) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at www.parliament.uk/parliamentary_committees/foreign_affairs_committee.cfm.
    [Show full text]
  • Подкласс Exogenia Collin, 1912
    Research Article ISSN 2336-9744 (online) | ISSN 2337-0173 (print) The journal is available on line at www.ecol-mne.com Contribution to the knowledge of distribution of Colubrid snakes in Serbia LJILJANA TOMOVIĆ1,2,4*, ALEKSANDAR UROŠEVIĆ2,4, RASTKO AJTIĆ3,4, IMRE KRIZMANIĆ1, ALEKSANDAR SIMOVIĆ4, NENAD LABUS5, DANKO JOVIĆ6, MILIVOJ KRSTIĆ4, SONJA ĐORĐEVIĆ1,4, MARKO ANĐELKOVIĆ2,4, ANA GOLUBOVIĆ1,4 & GEORG DŽUKIĆ2 1 University of Belgrade, Faculty of Biology, Studentski trg 16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 2 University of Belgrade, Institute for Biological Research “Siniša Stanković”, Bulevar despota Stefana 142, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 3 Institute for Nature Conservation of Serbia, Dr Ivana Ribara 91, 11070 Belgrade, Serbia 4 Serbian Herpetological Society “Milutin Radovanović”, Bulevar despota Stefana 142, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 5 University of Priština, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Biology Department, Lole Ribara 29, 38220 Kosovska Mitrovica, Serbia 6 Institute for Nature Conservation of Serbia, Vožda Karađorđa 14, 18000 Niš, Serbia *Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected] Received 28 March 2015 │ Accepted 31 March 2015 │ Published online 6 April 2015. Abstract Detailed distribution pattern of colubrid snakes in Serbia is still inadequately described, despite the long historical study. In this paper, we provide accurate distribution of seven species, with previously published and newly accumulated faunistic records compiled. Comparative analysis of faunas among all Balkan countries showed that Serbian colubrid fauna is among the most distinct (together with faunas of Slovenia and Romania), due to small number of species. Zoogeographic analysis showed high chorotype diversity of Serbian colubrids: seven species belong to six chorotypes. South-eastern Serbia (Pčinja River valley) is characterized by the presence of all colubrid species inhabiting our country, and deserves the highest conservation status at the national level.
    [Show full text]
  • The Status of Albanian in Relation to the Other Balkan Languages
    DOI: 10.11649/sm.2015.012 Slavia Meridionalis 15, 2015 Instytut Slawistyki PAN Bardh Rugova University of Prishtina The Status of Albanian in Relation to the Other Balkan Languages From 1972, i.e. when the standardisation of the Albanian language took place, the Albanian language went through three different socio­political stages that had an impact on its development. The first stage was the one that began in 1972 and lasted until the beginning of the nineties when the transition from totalitarianism to democracy took place in Albania and former Yugoslavia, two countries with the largest number of Albanian speakers. During this first stage, the Albanian language was a second­order language in Kosovo, whereas the official language, i.e. the language of prestige and the language used in government cusiness was Serbo­Croatian, even though a lot of attention was given to the Albanian language especially in Kosovo. The second stage covers the period from the 90’s until the war in Kosovo – the dissolution of the former Yugoslavia and pluralism in Albania. During this period, the apparatus that was taking care of standard Albanian and controlling it in Albania was not that active; in addition, the termination of television This work was supported by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology of the Republic of Kosovo. Competing interests: no competing interests have been declared. Publisher: Institute of Slavic Studies PAS. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 PL License (creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/pl/), which permits redistribution, commercial and non­ ­ commercial, provided that the article is properly cited.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Serbia: in Kosovo’S Shadow
    Policy Briefing Europe Briefing N°43 Belgrade/Pristina/Brussels, 27 June 2006 Southern Serbia: In Kosovo’s Shadow I. OVERVIEW For now, however, a number of steps would help to consolidate the recent stabilisation: The international community, and Kosovo Southern Serbia’s Albanian-majority Presevo Valley is a politicians should continue to make it clear that still incomplete Balkan success story. Since international Kosovo will not be partitioned, and the Presevo and Serbian government diplomacy resolved an ethnic Valley will remain within Serbia, and the Serbian Albanian insurgency in 2001, donors and Belgrade have government needs to abandon any thought of invested significant resources to undo a legacy of human partitioning Kosovo. rights violations and improve the economy. Tensions are much decreased, major human rights violations have The Serbian government institution charged with ended, the army and police are more sensitive to Albanian overseeing southern Serbia, the Coordination Body concerns and there is progress, though hesitant, in other for Southern Serbia, has ceased to function, leaving areas, such as a multi-ethnic police force, gradual integration no framework for resolving the region’s many of the judiciary, and Albanian language textbooks. Ethnic pressing problems precisely when tensions can be Albanians appear increasingly intent on developing their expected to rise due to the Kosovo status process. own political identity inside Serbia and finding a way to It should be revitalised as a priority, with Albanians cohabit with Serbs, something that should be encouraged renewing their participation, Belgrade giving it and supported. Nevertheless, the Kosovo status process real authority and resources, and the international threatens to disrupt the Presevo Valley’s calm.
    [Show full text]
  • Generatori Otpada I Zagaivači Južne I Jugoistočne Srbije
    GENERATORI OTPADA I ZAGA IVAI JUŽNE I JUGOISTONE SRBIJE Bratimir Neši dipl. inž. zaštite životne sredine Niš, Decembar 2010. Generatori otpada i zaga(iva)i južne i jugoisto)ne Srbije SADRŽAJ 1. Uvod ......................................................................................................................... 3 2. Životna sredina i prirodni resursi u Republici Srbiji ......................................... 4 3. Zna"enje osnovnih izraza u oblasti integrisanog spre"avanja i kontrole zaga'ivanja životne sredine ................................................................. 16 4. Zakonska regulativa .............................................................................................. 18 5. Integrisana dozvola ............................................................................................... 21 6. Integralni katastar zaga'iva"a .............................................................................. 28 7. Nišavski okrug – zaga'iva"i i generatori otpada .............................................. 31 8. Topli"ki okrug - zaga'iva"i i generatori otpada ............................................... 55 9. Pirotski okrug - zaga'iva"i i generatori otpada ................................................ 61 10. Jablani"ki okrug - zaga'iva"i i generatori otpada ............................................. 69 11. P"injski okrug - zaga'iva"i i generatori otpada ................................................ 83 12. Zaklju"ak ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Serbia 2Nd Periodical Report
    Strasbourg, 23 September 2010 MIN-LANG/PR (2010) 7 EUROPEAN CHARTER FOR REGIONAL OR MINORITY LANGUAGES Second periodical report presented to the Secretary General of the Council of Europe in accordance with Article 15 of the Charter SERBIA The Republic of Serbia The European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages The Second Periodical Report Submitted to the Secretary General of the Council of Europe Pursuant to Article 15 of the Charter Belgrade, September 2010 2 C O N T E N T S 1. INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………………………6 2. Part I …………………………………………………………………………………12 2.1. Legislative and institutional changes after the first cycle of monitoring of the implementation of the Charter …………………………………………………….12 2.1.1. Legislative changes ……………………………………………………….12 2.1.2. The National Strategy for the Improvement of the Status of Roma ……..17 2.1.3. Judicial Reform …………………………………………………………...17 2.1.4. Establishment of the Ministry of Human and Minority Rights …………..23 2.2. Novelties expected during the next monitoring cycle of the implementation of the Charter …………………………………………………………………………….24 2.2.1. The Census ………………………………………………………………..24 2.2.2. Election of the national councils of the national minorities ……………...26 2.3. Implementation of the recommendations of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe (RecChL(2009)2) 28) …………………………………………29 2.4. Activities for the implementation of the box-recommendation of the Committee of Experts with regard to the implementation of the Charter ………………………...33 3. PART II Implementation of Article 7 of the Charter ……………………………..38 3.1. Information on the policy, legislation and practice in the implementation of Part II - Article 7 of the Charter ……………………………………………………………..38 3.1.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Fice of for Eign As Sets Con Trol
    OF FICE OF FOR EIGN AS SETS CON TROL CHANGES TO LIST OF SPE CIALLY DES IG NATED NA TION ALS AND BLOCKED PER SONS SINCE JANU ARY 1, 2001 This pub li ca tion of Trea sury’s Of fice of The new Ex ec u tive Or der con tin ues and im - AIR PORT BEL GRADE (a.k.a. AERODROM For eign As sets Con trol (“OFAC”) is de- poses sanc tions on spec i fied par ties (listed BEOGRAD), Bel grade, Ser bia [FRYK] signed as a ref er ence tool pro vid ing with “[FRYM]” on OFAC’s al pha bet ized mas ter ALCO BANKA A.D., Bel grade, Ser bia [FRYK] list). Trans ac tions re lated to en tries listed with ALFA PLAM, Vranje, Ser bia [FRYK] ac tual no tice of ac tions by OFAC with “[FRYM]” must be in ter dicted and need to be AN GLO-YU GO SLAV BANK (n.k.a. AY BANK re spect to Spe cially Des ig nated Na - blocked on an on go ing ba sis. Be cause some LIMITED), Lon don, Eng land [FRYK] tionals and other en ti ties whose prop - “[FRYK]” en tries have also been des ig nated ANDJELKOVIC, Zoran, Min is ter of Sports and erty is blocked, to as sist the pub lic in as “[FRYM]” en tries, those par ties may ap pear Youth, Re pub lic of Ser bia; DOB 1958 (in di vid ual) com ply ing with the var i ous sanc tions both “above the line (as ‘[FRYM]’)” and “be low [FRYK] pro grams ad min is tered by OFAC.
    [Show full text]