DOCSLIB.ORG

Mountain Goat

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mountain Goat IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME Virgil Moore, Director Surveys and Inventories 2013 Statewide Report MOUNTAIN GOAT Study I, Job 5 July 1, 2012 to June 30, 2013 Prepared by: Wayne Wakkinen, Laura Wolf ................................................................ Panhandle Region George Pauley, Joshua White ................................................................. Clearwater Region Craig White, Katie Oelrich ....................................................... Southwest (Nampa) Region Regan Berkley ........................................................................... Southwest (McCall) Region Randy Smith........................................................................................ Magic Valley Region Daryl Meints, Duston Cureton ............................................................. Upper Snake Region Greg Painter .................................................................................................. Salmon Region Summer Crea ............................................................................................. Data Coordinator David Smith ............................................................................ Technical Records Specialist Compiled and edited by: Hollie Miyasaki, wildlife Staff Biologist 2013 Boise, Idaho Findings in this report are preliminary in nature and not for publication without permission of the Director of the Idaho Department of Fish and Game. The Idaho Department of Fish and Game adheres to all applicable state and federal laws and regulations related to discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, gender, or handicap. If you feel you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility of the Idaho Department of Fish and Game, or if you desire further information, please write to: Idaho Department of Fish and Game, PO Box 25, Boise, ID 83707; or the Office of Human Resources, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of the Interior, Washington, DC 20240. This publication will be made available in alternative formats upon request. Please contact the Idaho Department of Fish and Game for assistance. Mountain Goat Statewide Goat 2013 i TABLE OF CONTENTS STATEWIDE ...................................................................................................................................3 PANHANDLE REGION .................................................................................................................6 GMUS 1, 4A, 7, 9 ......................................................................................................................6 Abstract ................................................................................................................................6 Management Direction.........................................................................................................6 Background ..........................................................................................................................6 Population Surveys ..............................................................................................................7 Harvest Characteristics ........................................................................................................7 Management Implications ....................................................................................................7 Literature Cited ....................................................................................................................8 CLEARWATER REGION ............................................................................................................15 Abstract ..............................................................................................................................15 Management Direction.......................................................................................................15 Climatic Conditions ...........................................................................................................15 Background ........................................................................................................................15 CONTROLLED HUNT AREA 10 (GMUS 10, 12, 15, 16, 16A, 17) .....................................16 Population Surveys ............................................................................................................16 Harvest Characteristics ......................................................................................................16 Habitat Conditions .............................................................................................................16 Capture and Translocation .................................................................................................16 Management Implications ..................................................................................................17 CONTROLLED HUNT AREA 18 (GMUS 14, 18, 19, 20) ....................................................17 Population Surveys ............................................................................................................17 Harvest Characteristics ......................................................................................................17 Habitat Conditions .............................................................................................................17 Capture and Translocation .................................................................................................18 Management Implications ..................................................................................................18 SOUTHWEST (MCCALL) REGION ...........................................................................................26 CONTROLLED HUNT AREA 22 (GMUS 19A, 20A, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26) ............................26 Abstract ..............................................................................................................................26 Management Direction.......................................................................................................26 Mountain Goat Statewide Goat 2013 i TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Background ........................................................................................................................26 Population Surveys ............................................................................................................26 Harvest Characteristics ......................................................................................................26 Management Implications ..................................................................................................26 SOUTHWEST (NAMPA) REGION .............................................................................................29 CONTROLLED HUNT AREA 39 (GMUS 33, 34, 35, 39) ....................................................29 Abstract ..............................................................................................................................29 Management Direction.......................................................................................................29 Background ........................................................................................................................29 Population Surveys ............................................................................................................29 Harvest Characteristics ......................................................................................................30 Management Implications ..................................................................................................30 MAGIC VALLEY REGION .........................................................................................................33 CONTROLLED HUNT AREA 43 (GMUS 36, 43, 48) ..........................................................33 Abstract ..............................................................................................................................33 Management Direction.......................................................................................................33 Background ........................................................................................................................33 Population Surveys ............................................................................................................33 Harvest Characteristics ......................................................................................................33 Capture and Translocation .................................................................................................33 Management Implications ..................................................................................................34 UPPER SNAKE REGION .............................................................................................................37 Abstract ..............................................................................................................................37 Climatic Conditions ...........................................................................................................37 CONTROLLED HUNT AREA 50 (GMUS 49, 50) ................................................................37 Background ........................................................................................................................37 Population Surveys ............................................................................................................37
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Idaho Mountain Goat Management Plan (2019-2024)
    Idaho Mountain Goat Management Plan 2019-2024 Prepared by IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME June 2019 Recommended Citation: Idaho Mountain Goat Management Plan 2019-2024. Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Boise, USA. Team Members: Paul Atwood – Regional Wildlife Biologist Nathan Borg – Regional Wildlife Biologist Clay Hickey – Regional Wildlife Manager Michelle Kemner – Regional Wildlife Biologist Hollie Miyasaki– Wildlife Staff Biologist Morgan Pfander – Regional Wildlife Biologist Jake Powell – Regional Wildlife Biologist Bret Stansberry – Regional Wildlife Biologist Leona Svancara – GIS Analyst Laura Wolf – Team Leader & Regional Wildlife Biologist Contributors: Frances Cassirer – Wildlife Research Biologist Mark Drew – Wildlife Veterinarian Jon Rachael – Wildlife Game Manager Additional copies: Additional copies can be downloaded from the Idaho Department of Fish and Game website at fishandgame.idaho.gov Front Cover Photo: ©Hollie Miyasaki, IDFG Back Cover Photo: ©Laura Wolf, IDFG Idaho Department of Fish and Game (IDFG) adheres to all applicable state and federal laws and regulations related to discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, gender, disability or veteran’s status. If you feel you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility of IDFG, or if you desire further information, please write to: Idaho Department of Fish and Game, P.O. Box 25, Boise, ID 83707 or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Federal Assistance, Mailstop: MBSP-4020, 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA 22203, Telephone: (703) 358-2156. This publication will be made available in alternative formats upon request. Please contact IDFG for assistance. Costs associated with this publication are available from IDFG in accordance with Section 60-202, Idaho Code.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the Lemhi Pass Quadrangle, Lemhi County, Idaho
    IDAHO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY IDAHOGEOLOGY.ORG IGS DIGITAL WEB MAP 183 MONTANA BUREAU OF MINES AND GEOLOGY MBMG.MTECH.EDU MBMG OPEN FILE 701 Tuff, undivided (Eocene)—Mixed unit of tuffs interbedded with, and directly Jahnke Lake member, Apple Creek Formation (Mesoproterozoic)—Feldspathic this Cambrian intrusive event introduced the magnetite and REEs. CORRELATION OF MAP UNITS Tt Yajl below, the mafic lava flow unit (Tlm). Equivalent to rhyolitic tuff beds (Tct) quartzite, minor siltite, and argillite. Poorly exposed and only in the Whole-rock geochemical analysis of the syenite indicates enrichment in Y of Staatz (1972), who noted characteristic recessive weathering and a wide northeast corner of the map. Description based mostly on that of Yqpi on (54-89 ppm), Nb (192-218 ppm), Nd (90-119 ppm), La (131-180 ppm), and GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE LEMHI PASS QUADRANGLE, LEMHI COUNTY, IDAHO, AND Artificial Alluvial Deposits Mass-Movement Glacial Deposits and range of crystal, lithic, and vitric fragment (pumice) proportions. Tuffs lower the Kitty Creek map (Lewis and others, 2009) to the north. Fine- to Ce (234-325 ppm) relative to other intrusive rocks in the region (data from Deposits Deposits Periglacial Deposits in the sequence commonly contain conspicuous biotite phenocrysts. Most medium-grained, moderately well-sorted feldspathic quartzite. Typically Gillerman, 2008). Mineralization ages are complex, but some are clearly or all are probably rhyolitic. A quartzite-bearing tuff interbedded with mafic flat-laminated m to dm beds with little siltite or argillite. Plagioclase content m Paleozoic (Gillerman, 2008; Gillerman and others, 2008, 2010, and 2013) Qaf Qas Qgty Qalc Holocene lava flows north of Trail Creek yielded a U-Pb zircon age of 47.0 ± 0.2 Ma (12-28 percent) is greater than or sub-equal to potassium feldspar (5-16 as summarized below.
    [Show full text]
  • Representativeness Assessment of Research Natural Areas on National Forest System Lands in Idaho
    USDA United States Department of Representativeness Assessment of Agriculture Forest Service Research Natural Areas on Rocky Mountain Research Station National Forest System Lands General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-45 in Idaho March 2000 Steven K. Rust Abstract Rust, Steven K. 2000. Representativeness assessment of research natural areas on National Forest System lands in Idaho. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-45. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 129 p. A representativeness assessment of National Forest System (N FS) Research Natural Areas in ldaho summarizes information on the status of the natural area network and priorities for identification of new Research Natural Areas. Natural distribution and abundance of plant associations is compared to the representation of plant associations within natural areas. Natural distribution and abundance is estimated using modeled potential natural vegetation, published classification and inventory data, and Heritage plant community element occur- rence data. Minimum criteria are applied to select only viable, high quality plant association occurrences. In assigning natural area selection priorities, decision rules are applied to encompass consideration of the adequacy and viability of representation. Selected for analysis were 1,024 plant association occurrences within 21 4 natural areas (including 115 NFS Research Natural Areas). Of the 1,566 combinations of association within ecological sections, 28 percent require additional data for further analysis; 8, 40, and 12 percent, respectively, are ranked from high to low conservation priority; 13 percent are fully represented. Patterns in natural area needs vary between ecological section. The result provides an operational prioritization of Research Natural Area needs at landscape and subregional scales.
    [Show full text]
  • Big Boulder Lakes Boulder-White Cloud Mountains Date Oct
    Big Boulder lakes Boulder-White Cloud Mountains Date Oct. 1-3, 2014 Time Location Big Boulder Lakes – Challis, ID Weather Clear & cold but very windy Fish Species Westslope Cutthroat, Grayling Size Range Potentially 18” or bigger Fish Caught 1 Westslope Cuthroat – The wind curtailed my fishing efforts and so I explored Flies Used Elk Hair Caddis, Pheasant Tail Nymph Techniques Dry fly, stripping nymphs Comments Some of the best scenery in Idaho! I cannot confirm the big fish stories. See additional photos of the Boulder-White Cloud Mountains: https://www.flickr.com/photos/120225686@N06/sets/72157648089810649 See trip video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x5Xsska2XlU When I think of big fish in alpine lakes in Idaho – I think of the Big Boulder Lakes. I’ve seen photos and heard several reports that the fishing is excellent for big Cutthroat. Unfortunately, the relentless wind made the wind chill unbearable and I was relegated to bundling up and bagging a couple of peaks instead. But trust me – I have no regrets! The scenery is spectacular and possibly my favorite in Idaho. The Boulder-White Cloud Mountains are part of the Sawtooth National Recreation Area. The fight has continued for decades to designate the Boulder-White Clouds a Wilderness Area. I personally think it rivals the Sawtooths as my favorite backpacking destination in Idaho and I’ve set foot in most mountain ranges save a few in the panhandle. A view near the lower section of trail on the way to Walker Lake Itinerary Wednesday – Drive 4 hours from Boise; less than a mile hike to Jimmy Smith Lake; Backpack 6 to 7 miles to Walker Lake (camp).
    [Show full text]
  • Copper Basin Area Lakes
    Date Early September Time All Day Location Copper Basin Area; Sun Valley, ID Weather Clear Fish Species Golden, Cutthroat, RB, Grayling Size Range 10 – 16” Fish Caught Several Golden & Cutthroat Flies Used Mostly Elk Hair Caddis; Adams Techniques Dry Fly Comments More Golden Trout in beautiful country! Copper Basin is located between Sun Valley and Mackay. It separates the Pioneer and White Knob Mountain Ranges. It is a spot that many aren’t familiar with and offers great back country hiking, hunting and fishing. I saw Mountain Goat, Moose, Antelope, Deer, Elk bugling and my first Pine Marten. The area is a high Sage Brush flat surrounded by a mix of Pine and Aspen hills and Granite Peaks. I spent one night at Big Lake to the east of the basin and one night at Baptie Lake on the west side of the basin. I started out at noon and ended at noon on both trips which were both about 15 miles each. Lakes up Lake Creek drainage in the White Knob Mountains: Golden (Golden), Big (Cut, RB), Rough (Cut, RB), Long (RB), Round (Grayling). Lakes up Broad Canyon drainage in the Pioneer Mountains: Betty (Cut), Goat (Cut) & Baptie (Golden, Grayling) Copper Basin looking west toward the Pioneer Mountains I spent the first night at Big Lake which had some big hybrids. The trail to all five lakes is mechanized as well. I thought four-wheelers could only go part way up but you could drive to the lakes edge on four of them. That really surprised me after seeing the scenery.
    [Show full text]
  • Lemhi County, Idaho
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIRECTOR BUIJLETIN 528 GEOLOGY AND ORE DEPOSITS 1 OF LEMHI COUNTY, IDAHO BY JOSEPH B. UMPLEBY WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1913 CONTENTS. Page. Outline of report.......................................................... 11 Introduction.............................................................. 15 Scope of report......................................................... 15 Field work and acknowledgments...................................... 15 Early work............................................................ 16 Geography. .........> ....................................................... 17 Situation and access.........................--.-----------.-..--...-.. 17 Climate, vegetation, and animal life....................----.-----.....- 19 Mining................................................................ 20 General conditions.......... 1..................................... 20 History..............................-..............-..........:... 20 Production.................................,.........'.............. 21 Physiography.............................................................. 22 Existing topography.................................................... 22 Physiographic development............................................. 23 General features...............................................'.... 23 Erosion surface.................................................... 25 Correlation............. 1..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Idaho: Lewis Clark Byway Guide.Pdf
    The Lewis and Clark Backcountry Byway AND ADVENTURE ROAD Tendoy, Idaho Meriwether Lewis’s journal entry on August 18, 1805 —American Philosophical Society The Lewis and Clark Back Country Byway AND ADVENTURE ROAD Tendoy, Idaho The Lewis and Clark Back Country Byway and Adventure Road is a 36 mile loop drive through a beautiful and historic landscape on the Lewis and Clark National Historic Trail and the Continental Divide National Scenic Trail. The mountains, evergreen forests, high desert canyons, and grassy foothills look much the same today as when the Lewis and Clark Expedition passed through in 1805. THE PUBLIC LANDS CENTER Salmon-Challis National Forest and BLM Salmon Field Office 1206 S. Challis Street / Salmon, ID 83467 / (208)756-5400 BLM/ID/GI-15/006+1220 Getting There The portal to the Byway is Tendoy, Idaho, which is nineteen miles south of Salmon on Idaho Highway 28. From Montana, exit from I-15 at Clark Canyon Reservoir south of Dillon onto Montana Highway 324. Drive west past Grant to an intersection at the Shoshone Ridge Overlook. If you’re pulling a trailer or driving an RV with a passenger vehicle in tow, it would be a good idea to leave your trailer or RV at the overlook, which has plenty of parking, a vault toilet, and interpretive signs. Travel road 3909 west 12 miles to Lemhi Pass. Please respect private property along the road and obey posted speed signs. Salmon, Idaho, and Dillon, Montana, are full- service communities. Limited services are available in Tendoy, Lemhi, and Leadore, Idaho and Grant, Montana.
    [Show full text]
  • Idaho – a Guide in Word and Picture Prepared by Federal Writers’ Projects
    The Federal Writers' Project was a part of the Works Progress Administration during the Great Depression of the 1930s. One of the Project’s assignments was to produce descriptions of tours across Idaho. The text below is excerpted and edited from the description of Tour No. 4, which went from Blackfoot to Arco to Challis. One error is marked with an asterisk; one debatable claim is marked with “° ”. The description of Arco is a striking example of the writers’ craft. _________________________________________________ Idaho – a Guide in Word and Picture Prepared by Federal Writers’ Projects The Caxton Printers, Caldwell, Idaho, 1937 Copyright 1937 by Franklin Girard, Secretary of State of Idaho ____ TOUR NO.4 Blackfoot to Arco to the junction with U S 93, two miles south of Challis. 144m. State 27. Lost River Highway. The Oregon Short Line Railroad parallels this route between Blackfoot and Mackay. Salmon River Stages use the highway between Blackfoot and Challis. Accommodations throughout are less than average in hotels and tourist camps, and travelers who plan to spend some time in the region are wise to equip and provision themselves for an outdoor life. State 27 proceeds out of Blackfoot (R) into the northwest, and soon leaves the fertile Snake River Valley to enter that enormous desolation of volcanic outpourings of which the Craters of the Moon are only a very small part. The contrast can be felt more deeply if it is remem- bered that State 39, which branches (L) at 5 m., turns south to SPRINGFIELD 20 m., in the vicinity of which is produced almost half of the Grimm alfalfa seed grown in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Geology Sand Mineral Deposits in and Mear the Oentral
    Regional Geology sand Mineral Deposits In and Mear the Oentral Part of the Lemhl Range, Lemhi County, Itlaho tJ.S, GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER Regional Geology and Mineral Deposits In and Near the Central Part of the Lemhi Range, Lemhi County, Idaho By EDWARD T. RUPPEL and DAVID A. LOPEZ U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1480 A descriptive summary of the rocks and structure in part of east-central Idaho UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1988 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL HODEL, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Any use of trade names in this report is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorse­ ment by the U.S. Geological Survey. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Ruppel, Edward Thompson, 1925- Regional geology and mineral deposits in and near the central part of the Lemhi Range, Lemhi County, Idaho. (U.S. Geological Survey professional paper ; 1480) Bibliography: p. Supt. of Docs, no.: I 19.16:1480 1. Geology Idaho Lemhi Range. 2. Ore-deposits Idaho Lemhi Range. I. Lopez, David A. II. Title. III. Series. QE104.L43R86 1988 557.9678 87-600492 For sale by the Books and Open-File Reports Section, U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center, Box 25425, Denver, CO 80225 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract ........................................... 1 Granitic intrusive rocks Continued Introduction ....................................... 2 Petrography Continued Topography and drainage ......................... 2 Early Paleozoic granite in the Beaverhead Mountains 59 Present work and acknowledgments ................ 4 Eocene granitic rocks in the Lemhi Range ....... 62 Summary of earlier geologic studies ................ 7 Descriptions of intrusive masses ..................
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Payette National Forest and Vicinity West-Central Idaho
    Geology of the Payette National Forest and Vicinity, West-Central Idaho Professional Paper 1666 Version 1.1, April 2021 Supersedes USGS Miscellaneous Geologic Investigations Map I–2599 and the GIS data in USGS Open-File Report 98–219–B U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover. View to south of Big Creek airstrip and Edwardsburg in midground from McFadden Point. North end of hogback at airstrip is dated location of the Neoproterozoic Hogback Rhyolite Member of the Edwardsburg Formation, one of the herein named and dated formations of the Windermere Supergroup. Western and northern edge of Thunder Mountain caldera in peaks to left and middle of Profile Gap, and roof pendants of Windermere Supergroup floating above Cretaceous granite in peaks to right. Geology of the Payette National Forest and Vicinity, West-Central Idaho Frontispiece. A first publication on the Mesoproterozoic biotite gneiss migmatite (Ygn) of the Middle Fork Salmon River (date unknown). Geology of the Payette National Forest and Vicinity, West-Central Idaho By Karen Lund Chapter A Geologic Setting of the Payette National Forest, West-Central Idaho By Karen Lund Chapter B Description of Map Units for the Geologic Map of the Payette National Forest, West-Central Idaho By Karen Lund Chapters A and B are issued as a single volume and are not available separately Professional Paper 1666–A–B Version 1.1, April 2021 Supersedes USGS Miscellaneous Geologic Investigations Map I–2599 and the GIS data in USGS Open-File Report 98–219–B U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution and Migration of the Black Rosy Finch
    18 Vol. 61 DISTRIBUTION AND MIGRATION OF THE BLACK ROSY FINCH By NORMAN R. FRENCH Since 1951, the alpine habitat of the Black Rosy Finch (Leucosticte tephroc&s atvutu) has been visited in many mountain ranges for the purpose of determining the breeding range of this species.The distribution of this specieshas long been uncertain. Available information is scattered and some of it remains unpublished in the form of museum specimens. This report adds new findings and summarizes existing data on distribution. Part of the work was conducted with sponsorship of the Jackson Hole Biological Station. Support from the New York Zoological Society and from the Frank M. Chap- man Memorial Fund made much of this effort possible. Jean B. French aided in all phases of the investigation. William H. Behle gave freely of his time and advice and was extremely helpful and cooperative at all times. Specimenscollected during this study have been added to the collection of the University of Utah Museum of Vertebrate Zoology (VU). I am indebted also to the following persons who furnished information or specimens from collections which were used in connection with this report: Lang Bailey, formerly with the Colorado Natural History Museum; R. M. de Schauensee, Philadelphia Academy of Natural Sciences; Herbert Friedmann, U. S. National Mu- seum; H. K. Gloyd, Chicago Academy of Sciences; C. M. Greenhalgh, Utah State Fish and Game Department; J. C. Greenway, Museum of Comparative Zoology; L. M. Huey, San Diego Natural History Museum; J. B. Hurley, Yakima, Washington; A. H. Miller, Museum of Vertebrate Zoology (MVZ) ; R.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Rosy-Finch Leucosticte Atrata
    Black Rosy-Finch Leucosticte atrata Aves — Passeriformes — Fringillidae CONSERVATION STATUS / CLASSIFICATION Rangewide: Apparently secure (G4) Statewide: Vulnerable (S3) ESA: No status USFS: Region 1: No status; Region 4: No status BLM: No status IDFG: Protected nongame BASIS FOR INCLUSION Lack of population estimates and trend data. TAXONOMY Despite some evidence of variation in bill size and shape between mountain ranges, no subspecies are currently recognized (Johnson 2002). Of the 3 species of rosy-finch that occur in North America (an additional 4 species also occur in Asia), the black rosy-finch is by far the darkest in color and in the middle position geographically between the gray- crowned rosy-finch (L. tephrocotis) to the north and west, and the brown-capped rosy- finch (L. australis) to the south and east. Hybridization between the black rosy-finch and 1 of the 6 subspecies of the gray-crowned rosy-finch (L. t. tephrocotis) was first discovered in the Bitterroot Range along the Montana-Idaho border (Mewaldt 1950), and subsequently in the Seven Devils Mountains (French 1959). DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE The black rosy-finch is found breeding above treeline in suitable habitat from central Idaho and west-central Montana southward through southeastern Oregon, northern and eastern Nevada to southern Utah and western and north-central Wyoming (Johnson 2002). Winter range for this species includes its breeding range, either on alpine tundra and open slopes just below treeline when snow levels are high, or lower in intermountain valleys and east slopes of mountains when snow levels are lower and higher slopes are snowbound (Johnson 2002).
    [Show full text]