FDA Briefing Document Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

FDA Briefing Document Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs FDA Briefing Document Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs Advisory Committee (CRDAC) Meeting December 10, 2019 Topic: New Drug Application 22034 Vernakalant Hydrochloride Injection for the Rapid Conversion of Recent Onset Atrial Fibrillation 1 The attached package contains background information prepared by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the panel members of the advisory committee. The FDA background package often contains assessments and/or conclusions and recommendations written by individual FDA reviewers. Such conclusions and recommendations do not necessarily represent the final position of the individual reviewers, nor do they necessarily represent the final position of the Review Division or Office. We have brought New Drug Application 22034, atrial fibrillation for the treatment of recent onset atrial fibrillation, to this Advisory Committee in order to gain the Committee’s insights and opinions on key issues identified by the Agency. The background package may not include all issues relevant to the final regulatory recommendation, and the final determination may be affected by issues not discussed at the advisory committee meeting. The FDA will not issue a final determination on the issues at hand until input from the advisory committee process has been considered and all reviews have been finalized. 2 Table of Contents Glossary .......................................................................................................................................... 8 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 12 2. Draft Topics for Discussion ................................................................................................... 13 3. Purpose .................................................................................................................................. 14 4. Treatment of Recent Onset Atrial Fibrillation ....................................................................... 14 5. Product Under Review........................................................................................................... 16 6. Proposed Indication ............................................................................................................... 16 7. Proposed Dosage and Administration ................................................................................... 17 8. Preclinical Pharmacology ...................................................................................................... 17 9. Regulatory Background ......................................................................................................... 17 10. Overview of Clinical Development ....................................................................................... 20 11. Conclusions on the Substantial Evidence of Effectiveness ................................................... 24 12. Overview of Safety Findings from Clinical Trials ................................................................ 25 Overall Exposure and Characteristics of the Safety Population ................................. 25 Deaths and Serious Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) ................................ 25 Serious Hypotension ........................................................................................ 26 Serious Ventricular Arrhythmias ..................................................................... 27 Serious Conduction Disturbances .................................................................... 28 Serious Bradycardia ......................................................................................... 28 ECG and Blood Pressure Changes .................................................................. 29 Serious Adverse Events after ECV .................................................................. 31 13. Postmarketing Safety Experience .......................................................................................... 31 Review of non-US Postmarketing Data Submitted in the NDA ................................ 31 SPECTRUM ............................................................................................................... 32 Background and Study Design ........................................................................ 32 Objectives ........................................................................................................ 32 Data Sources .................................................................................................... 33 Study Subjects ................................................................................................. 33 3 Overall Exposure ............................................................................................. 34 Safety Results .................................................................................................. 35 Summary and Limitations ............................................................................... 36 14. Safety of Available Alternative Therapies ............................................................................ 37 Overview .................................................................................................................... 37 Ibutilide ....................................................................................................................... 38 Electrical Cardioversion ............................................................................................. 38 Use of Cardiac Conversion Therapies ........................................................................ 39 Conclusions on the Safety of Alternative Therapies .................................................. 39 15. Proposed Risk Management Plan .......................................................................................... 39 16. FDA Integrated Benefit/Risk Assessment ............................................................................. 40 17. Appendices ............................................................................................................................ 43 Demographic and Baseline Characteristics of All Patients Population ...................... 43 in Integrated Analysis of Clinical Trials ................................................................................... 43 Preclinical Pharmacology ........................................................................................... 44 Potency of Vernakalant Inhibition of Cardiac Ion Channels from ............................. 54 Various Species and Cloned Cell Models (IC50s) ..................................................................... 54 Frequency- and Voltage-dependent Block of Peak Sodium Channel by ................... 55 Vernakalant ............................................................................................................................... 55 Vernakalant-related Deaths in Clinical Trials Based on Medical .............................. 56 Review ...................................................................................................................................... 56 Summaries of Serious Adverse Events of Special Interest 0-2 Hours ....................... 57 from Dosing (Clinical Trials).................................................................................................... 57 Selected Postmarketing (outside of US) Serious Adverse Event and ........................ 61 Death Cases ............................................................................................................................... 61 Selected Narratives from SPECTRUM ...................................................................... 63 ACT V Eligibility Criteria .......................................................................................... 64 Ibutilide Postmarketing Data ...................................................................................... 66 FDA Adverse Event Reporting System Data .................................................. 66 Medical Literature ........................................................................................... 66 Electrical Cardioversion Literature Review ............................................................... 71 Applicant’s Proposed Pre-Infusion Checklist ............................................................. 80 Serious Adverse Events and Number Needed to Harm (NNH) ................................. 82 4 Ventricular Arrhythmia Events from 12-lead Electrocardiograms ............................ 83 5 Table of Tables Table 1. Overview of completed clinical studies in AF/AFL patients for vernakalant Injection 21 Table 2. Conversion to Sinus Rhythm within 90 Minutes in ACT I and ACT III....................... 24 Table 3. Conversion to Sinus Rhythm within 90 Minutes, ACT I and ACT III Combined by Dose .............................................................................................................................................. 24 Table 4. Conversion to Sinus Rhythm within 90 Minutes in CRAFT ......................................... 25 Table 5. Incidence of serious hypotension-related AEs within 2 hours post-dose ...................... 26 Table 6. Incidence of serious ventricular arrhythmia AEs within 2 Hours Post-dose ................. 27 Table 7. Incidence of serious conduction disturbance AEs within 2 hours post-dose ................. 28 Table 8. Incidence of serious bradycardia AEs within 2 hours post-dose ..................................
Recommended publications
  • Table 2. 2012 AGS Beers Criteria for Potentially
    Table 2. 2012 AGS Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults Strength of Organ System/ Recommendat Quality of Recomm Therapeutic Category/Drug(s) Rationale ion Evidence endation References Anticholinergics (excludes TCAs) First-generation antihistamines Highly anticholinergic; Avoid Hydroxyzin Strong Agostini 2001 (as single agent or as part of clearance reduced with e and Boustani 2007 combination products) advanced age, and promethazi Guaiana 2010 Brompheniramine tolerance develops ne: high; Han 2001 Carbinoxamine when used as hypnotic; All others: Rudolph 2008 Chlorpheniramine increased risk of moderate Clemastine confusion, dry mouth, Cyproheptadine constipation, and other Dexbrompheniramine anticholinergic Dexchlorpheniramine effects/toxicity. Diphenhydramine (oral) Doxylamine Use of diphenhydramine in Hydroxyzine special situations such Promethazine as acute treatment of Triprolidine severe allergic reaction may be appropriate. Antiparkinson agents Not recommended for Avoid Moderate Strong Rudolph 2008 Benztropine (oral) prevention of Trihexyphenidyl extrapyramidal symptoms with antipsychotics; more effective agents available for treatment of Parkinson disease. Antispasmodics Highly anticholinergic, Avoid Moderate Strong Lechevallier- Belladonna alkaloids uncertain except in Michel 2005 Clidinium-chlordiazepoxide effectiveness. short-term Rudolph 2008 Dicyclomine palliative Hyoscyamine care to Propantheline decrease Scopolamine oral secretions. Antithrombotics Dipyridamole, oral short-acting* May
    [Show full text]
  • Vernakalant Versus Ibutilide for Immediate Conversion of Recent-Onset Atrial Fibrillation Vogiatzis I, Papavasiliou E, Dapcevitch I, Pittas S, Koulouris E
    HIPPOKRATIA 2017, 21, 2: 67-73 RESEARCH ARTICLE Vernakalant versus ibutilide for immediate conversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation Vogiatzis I, Papavasiliou E, Dapcevitch I, Pittas S, Koulouris E Department of Cardiology, General Hospital of Veroia, Veroia, Greece Abstract Background: The pharmacological cardioversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) is a challenge for the clinician. The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy, the safety, and the overall cost of intravenous (iv) administration of vernakalant, which is a relatively new atrial-selective antiarrhythmic agent, versus ibutilide, in cardioversion of recent- onset AF. Methods: We enrolled in this study 78 patients (56 men, 22 women; mean age 63.72 ± 6.67 years) who presented with recent-onset AF. Cardioversion was attempted in 36 patients (group A: 24 men, 12 women; mean age 62.44 ± 7.24 years) by iv administration of vernakalant (3 mg/kg over 10 min and if needed after 15 min, a second dose 2 mg/kg over 10 min) while in 42 patients (group B: 32 men, 10 women; mean age 64.81 ± 6 years) iv ibutilide was administered (1 mg over 10 min and if needed after 10 min, a second dose 1 mg over 10 min). Results: AF was successfully converted in 52.78 % of (n =19) patients of group A vs 52.38 % of (n =22) patients of group B (p =0.58), with an average time of conversion 11.8 ± 4.3 min for group A patients vs 33.9 ± 20.25 min for group B patients (p <0.0001). The average length of hospital stay for patients of group A was 17.64 ± 15.96 hours vs 41.09 ± 17.6 hours for patients of Group B (p <0.0001).
    [Show full text]
  • Arrhythmias in the Intensive Care Patient Hans-Joachim Trappe, Bodo Brandts and Peter Weismueller
    Arrhythmias in the intensive care patient Hans-Joachim Trappe, Bodo Brandts and Peter Weismueller Purpose of review ventricular fibrillation. The use of automatic external Atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, AV–nodal reentry tachycardia defibrillators by basic life support ambulance providers or first with rapid ventricular response, atrial ectopic tachycardia, and responder in early defibrillation programs has been associated preexcitation syndromes combined with atrial fibrillation or with a significant increase in survival rates. Drugs such as ventricular tachyarrhythmias are typical arrhythmias in intensive lidocaine, procainamide, sotalol, amiodarone, or magnesium care patients. Most frequently, the diagnosis of the underlying were recommended for treatment of ventricular arrhythmia is possible from the physical examination, the tachyarrhythmias in intensive care patients. Amiodarone is a response to maneuvers or drugs, and the 12-lead surface highly efficacious antiarrhythmic agent for many cardiac electrocardiogram. In all patients with unstable hemodynamics, arrhythmias, ranging from atrial fibrillation to malignant immediate DC-cardioversion is indicated. Conversion of atrial ventricular tachyarrhythmias, and seems to be superior to other fibrillation to sinus rhythm is possible using antiarrhythmic antiarrhythmic agents. drugs. Amiodarone has a conversion rate in atrial fibrillation of up to 80%. However, caution in the use of short-term Keywords administration of intravenous amiodarone in critically ill patients atrial fibrillation,
    [Show full text]
  • Safety and Efficacy of Ibutilide in Cardioversion of Atrial Flutter And
    J Am Board Fam Med: first published as 10.3122/jabfm.2011.01.080096 on 5 January 2011. Downloaded from CLINICAL REVIEW Safety and Efficacy of Ibutilide in Cardioversion of Atrial Flutter and Fibrillation Madhuri Nair, MD, Lekha K. George, MD, and Santhosh K. G. Koshy, MD This article reviews the safety and efficacy of ibutilide for use in patients with atrial fibrillation and flut- ter. Ibutilide, a class III antiarrhythmic agent, is primarily used for conversion of atrial flutter and fi- brillation and is a good alternative to electrical cardioversion. Ibutilide has a conversion rate of up to 75% to 80% in recent-onset atrial fibrillation and flutter; the conversion rate is higher for atrial flutter than for atrial fibrillation. It is also safe in the conversion of chronic atrial fibrillation/flutter among patients receiving oral amiodarone therapy. Ibutilide pretreatment facilitates transthoracic defibrilla- tion and decreases the energy requirement of electrical cardioversion by both monophasic and biphasic shocks. Pretreatment with ibutilide before electrical defibrillation has a conversion rate of 100% com- pared with 72% with no pretreatment. Ibutilide is also safe and efficient in the treatment of atrial fibril- lation in patients who have had cardiac surgery, and in accessory pathway–mediated atrial fibrillation where the conversion rate of ibutilide is as high as 95%. There is up to a 4% risk of torsade de pointes and a 4.9% risk of monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. Hence, close monitoring in an intensive care unit setting is warranted during and at least for 4 hours after drug infusion. The anticoagulation strat- egy is the same as for any other mode of cardioversion.(J Am Board Fam Med 2011;24:86–92.) Keywords: Antiarrhythmics, Arrhythmia, Atrial Fibrillation, Cardiovascular Disorders, Cardioversion, Drug Ther- copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Efficacy and Safety of Ibutilide for the Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation: a Systematic Review and Meta- Analysis
    Open Access Austin Surgery Case Reports Review Article Efficacy and Safety of Ibutilide for the Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta- Analysis Gong CC1, Tang Y2, Huang Y2 and Liu X2* 1Zhejiang University School of Medicine Children’s Abstract Hospital, China Background: Ibutilide has been approved for cardioversion of Atrial 2Department of Critical Care Medicine, the Affiliated Fibrillation (AF), but its side-effects include a high risk of torsade de pointes, Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, China besides, one recent meta-analysis showed ibutilide was inferior to vernakalant *Corresponding author: Liu X, Department of Critical for conversion (AF<7 days). Hence, the aim of this study is to evaluate the Care Medicine, the Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical efficacy and safety of ibutilide for the cardioversion of AF within 90 days. University, China Methods: The Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Received: February 16, 2021; Accepted: March 17, databases and clinical trials.gov were comprehensively searched for relevant 2021; Published: March 24, 2021 studies from January 1991 to May 2020 using the keywords “ibutilide” and “atrial fibrillation”. Only Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) comparing ibutilide with placebo or other Anti-Arrhythmic Drugs (AADs) for the termination of AF (duration of AF ≤90 days) were included. The primary outcome was successful cardioversion in response to ibutilide versus placebo or other AADs within 4h. Related adverse events were defined as secondary outcomes. Results: A total of 1712 patients in 13 RCTs met the eligibility criteria. Four trials compared ibutilide to placebo; nine trials compared ibutilide to other active drugs.
    [Show full text]
  • Keeping up with the Pace of Antiarrhythmic Drugs ANNMARIE PALATNIK, APN,BC, MSN Coordinator of Continuing Education • Virtua Health • Marlton, N.J
    D rug File Keeping up with the pace of antiarrhythmic drugs ANNMARIE PALATNIK, APN,BC, MSN Coordinator of Continuing Education • Virtua Health • Marlton, N.J. HAVE YOU NOTICED how challenging it is to Conducting impulses keep pace with the The conduction system of the heart, shown below, begins with the heart’s natural pacemaker, the changing beat of phar- sinoatrial (SA) node. When an impulse leaves the SA node, it travels through the atria along macology? Just as you Bachmann’s bundle and the internodal pathways on its way to the atrioventricular (AV) node. After learn the latest drugs the impulse passes through the AV node, it travels to the ventricles, first down the bundle of His, and classifications, new then along the bundle branches and, finally, down the Purkinje fibers. classes are developed and new drugs added to Bachmann’s bundle classes. Even drugs that have been on the mar- ket a long time can have dosing and indica- SA node tion changes. Antiarrhythmic Internodal tracts drugs, which restore Posterior (Thorel’s) normal rhythm and Middle (Wenckebach’s) conduction to the heart, Anterior are no exception. In this AV node article, I’ll bring you up-to-date on the Bundle of His antiarrhythmics now Right bundle branch available. Left bundle branch Class assignments Most antiarrhythmic drugs used to slow a rapid heart rate are classified according to the Vaughn Williams classification system Purkinje fibers (see Classifying Anti- arrhythmics the Vaughn Williams way). These drugs fall Class I into four general groups in this classification system Sodium channel blockers stop the flow of sodium into with each group having several subgroups.
    [Show full text]
  • Ventricular Tachycardia Drugs Versus Devices John Camm St
    Cardiology Update 2015 Davos, Switzerland: 8-12th February 2015 Ventricular Arrhythmias Ventricular Tachycardia Drugs versus Devices John Camm St. George’s University of London, UK Imperial College, London, UK Declaration of Interests Chairman: NICE Guidelines on AF, 2006; ESC Guidelines on Atrial Fibrillation, 2010 and Update, 2012; ACC/AHA/ESC Guidelines on VAs and SCD; 2006; NICE Guidelines on ACS and NSTEMI, 2012; NICE Guidelines on heart failure, 2008; NICE Guidelines on Atrial Fibrillation, 2006; ESC VA and SCD Guidelines, 2015 Steering Committees: multiple trials including novel anticoagulants DSMBs: multiple trials including BEAUTIFUL, SHIFT, SIGNIFY, AVERROES, CASTLE- AF, STAR-AF II, INOVATE, and others Events Committees: one trial of novel oral anticoagulants and multiple trials of miscellaneous agents with CV adverse effects Editorial Role: Editor-in-Chief, EP-Europace and Clinical Cardiology; Editor, European Textbook of Cardiology, European Heart Journal, Electrophysiology of the Heart, and Evidence Based Cardiology Consultant/Advisor/Speaker: Astellas, Astra Zeneca, ChanRX, Gilead, Merck, Menarini, Otsuka, Sanofi, Servier, Xention, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol- Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Pfizer, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Medtronic, St. Jude Medical, Actelion, GlaxoSmithKline, InfoBionic, Incarda, Johnson and Johnson, Mitsubishi, Novartis, Takeda Therapy for Ventricular Tachycardia Medical therapy Antiarrhythmic drugs Autonomic management Ventricular tachycardia Monomorphic Polymorphic Ventricular fibrillation Ventricular storms Ablation therapy Device therapy Surgical Defibrillation Catheter Antitachycardia pacing History of Antiarrhythmic Drugs 1914 - Quinidine 1950 - Lidocaine 1951 - Procainamide 1946 – Digitalis 1956 – Ajmaline 1962 - Verapamil 1962 – Disopyramide 1964 - Propranolol 1967 – Amiodarone 1965 – Bretylium 1972 – Mexiletine 1973 – Aprindine, Tocainide 1969 - Diltiazem 1975- Flecainide 1976 – Propafenone Encainide Ethmozine 2000 - Sotalol D-sotalol 1995 - Ibutilide (US) Recainam 2000 – Dofetilide US) IndecainideX Etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Patent Application Publication ( 10 ) Pub . No . : US 2019 / 0192440 A1
    US 20190192440A1 (19 ) United States (12 ) Patent Application Publication ( 10) Pub . No. : US 2019 /0192440 A1 LI (43 ) Pub . Date : Jun . 27 , 2019 ( 54 ) ORAL DRUG DOSAGE FORM COMPRISING Publication Classification DRUG IN THE FORM OF NANOPARTICLES (51 ) Int . CI. A61K 9 / 20 (2006 .01 ) ( 71 ) Applicant: Triastek , Inc. , Nanjing ( CN ) A61K 9 /00 ( 2006 . 01) A61K 31/ 192 ( 2006 .01 ) (72 ) Inventor : Xiaoling LI , Dublin , CA (US ) A61K 9 / 24 ( 2006 .01 ) ( 52 ) U . S . CI. ( 21 ) Appl. No. : 16 /289 ,499 CPC . .. .. A61K 9 /2031 (2013 . 01 ) ; A61K 9 /0065 ( 22 ) Filed : Feb . 28 , 2019 (2013 .01 ) ; A61K 9 / 209 ( 2013 .01 ) ; A61K 9 /2027 ( 2013 .01 ) ; A61K 31/ 192 ( 2013. 01 ) ; Related U . S . Application Data A61K 9 /2072 ( 2013 .01 ) (63 ) Continuation of application No. 16 /028 ,305 , filed on Jul. 5 , 2018 , now Pat . No . 10 , 258 ,575 , which is a (57 ) ABSTRACT continuation of application No . 15 / 173 ,596 , filed on The present disclosure provides a stable solid pharmaceuti Jun . 3 , 2016 . cal dosage form for oral administration . The dosage form (60 ) Provisional application No . 62 /313 ,092 , filed on Mar. includes a substrate that forms at least one compartment and 24 , 2016 , provisional application No . 62 / 296 , 087 , a drug content loaded into the compartment. The dosage filed on Feb . 17 , 2016 , provisional application No . form is so designed that the active pharmaceutical ingredient 62 / 170, 645 , filed on Jun . 3 , 2015 . of the drug content is released in a controlled manner. Patent Application Publication Jun . 27 , 2019 Sheet 1 of 20 US 2019 /0192440 A1 FIG .
    [Show full text]
  • Safety and Efficacy of Vernakalant for the Conversion of Atrial Fibrillation to Sinus Rhythm; a Phase 3B Randomized Controlled Trial Gregory N
    Beatch and Mangal BMC Cardiovascular Disorders (2016) 16:113 DOI 10.1186/s12872-016-0289-0 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Safety and efficacy of vernakalant for the conversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm; a phase 3b randomized controlled trial Gregory N. Beatch1* and Brian Mangal2 Abstract Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common cardiac arrhythmia that is associated with significant health risks. One strategy to mitigate the risks associated with long-term AF is to convert AF to sinus rhythm (SR). This study assessed the efficacy and safety of vernakalant hydrochloride for the pharmacological conversion of AF to SR. Methods: Patients with recent-onset (duration >3 h– ≤ 7 days) symptomatic AF and no evidence or history of congestive heart failure were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive vernakalant or placebo. Patients received an infusion of vernakalant (3 mg/kg) or placebo over 10 min, followed by a second infusion of vernakalant (2 mg/kg) or placebo 15 min later if AF had not been terminated. The primary efficacy endpoint was conversion of AF to SR for at least 1 min within 90 min of the start of drug infusion. The primary safety endpoint was a composite of: occurrence of clinically significant hypotension, clinically significant ventricular arrhythmia (including torsades de pointes, ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation) or death within 2 h of starting the drug infusion. Results: A total of 217 patients were randomized to receive vernakalant (n = 145) or placebo (n =72).Ofthe129 individuals who received vernakalant, 59 (45.7 %) converted to SR compared with one of the 68 patients (1.5 %) who received placebo (p < 0.0001).
    [Show full text]
  • Product Monograph
    PRODUCT MONOGRAPH PrCORVERT® (ibutilide fumarate injection) 0.1 mg/mL Antiarrhythmic Agent Pfizer Canada ULC Date of Preparation: 17,300 Trans-Canada Highway 29 March 2019 Kirkland, Quebec H9J 2M5 Control No. 222103 ® TM Pharmacia & Upjohn Company LLC Pfizer Canada ULC, Licensee © Pfizer Canada ULC 2019 PRODUCT MONOGRAPH PrCORVERT® (ibutilide fumarate injection) 0.1mg/mL Antiarrhythmic Agent ACTION AND CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY CORVERT (ibutilide fumarate injection) is an antiarrhythmic drug with predominantly class III (cardiac action potential prolongation) properties according to the Vaughan Williams Classification. Ibutilide fumarate prolongs action potential duration in isolated adult cardiac myocytes and increases both atrial and ventricular refractoriness in vivo, i.e. class III electrophysiologic effects. Voltage clamp studies indicate that ibutilide at nanomolar concentrations, delays repolarisation by activation of a slow, inward current (predominantly sodium), rather than by blocking outward potassium currents, which is the mechanism by which most other class III antiarrhythmics act. These effects lead to prolongation of atrial and ventricular action potential duration and refractoriness, the predominant electrophysiologic properties of ibutilide in humans that are thought to be the basis for its antiarrhythmic effect. 2 PHARMACODYNAMICS Electrophysiologic Effects: Ibutilide produces mild slowing of the sinus rate and atrioventricular conduction. Ibutilide produces no clinically significant effect on QRS duration at the recommended dosage. Ibutilide produces dose-related prolongation of the QT interval, which is thought to be associated with its antiarrhythmic activity. However, there is no established relationship between plasma concentration and antiarrhythmic activity. In studies in healthy volunteers, intravenous infusions of ibutilide resulted in prolongation of the QT interval that was directly correlated with ibutilide plasma concentration during and after 10-minute and 8-hour infusions.
    [Show full text]
  • Superiority of Ibutilide (A New Class III Agent) Over
    568 Heart 1998;79:568–575 Superiority of ibutilide (a new class III agent) over DL-sotalol in converting atrial flutter and atrial Heart: first published as 10.1136/hrt.79.6.568 on 1 June 1998. Downloaded from fibrillation M A Vos, S R Golitsyn, K Stangl, M Y Ruda, L Van Wijk, J D Harry, K T Perry, P Touboul, G Steinbeck, HJJWellens, for the Ibutilide/Sotalol Comparator Study Group Abstract III drug, under monitored conditions, is a Objective—To compare the eYcacy and potential alternative to currently available safety of a single dose of ibutilide, a new cardioversion options. class III antiarrhythmic drug, with that of (Heart 1998;79:568–575) DL-sotalol in terminating chronic atrial fibrillation or flutter in haemodynami- Keywords: atrial fibrillation; atrial flutter; cally stable patients. antiarrhythmic agents; ibutilide; sotalol Design—Double blind, randomised study. Setting—43 European hospitals. Atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter are the most Patients—308 patients (mean age 60 years, 70% men, 48% with heart disease) with frequently occurring tachycardias in man: sustained atrial fibrillation (n = 251) or prevalence is estimated to be 0.4% for atrial 1–3 atrial flutter (n = 57) (duration three fibrillation and 0.1% for atrial flutter, and hours to 45 days) were randomised to they may increase to 4% in people older than University Hospital, three groups to receive a 10 minute 60 years. Treatment for acute conversion of Maastricht, infusion of 1 mg ibutilide (n = 99), 2 mg these arrhythmias consists of antiarrhythmic Netherlands drugs or electrical cardioversion, or both. MAVos ibutilide (n = 106), or 1.5 mg/kg DL-sotalol HJJWellens (n = 103).
    [Show full text]
  • PHARMACY TIMES by IEHP PHARMACEUTICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT February 11, 2013
    PHARMACY TIMES BY IEHP PHARMACEUTICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT February 11, 2013 The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) developed performance and quality measures to help Medicare beneficiaries make informed decisions regarding health and prescription drug plans. As part of this effort, CMS adopted measures for High Risk Medication (HRM) endorsed by the Pharmacy Quality Alliance (PQA) and the National Quality Forum (NQF). The HRM was developed using existing HEDIS measurement “Drugs to be avoided in the elderly”. The HRM rate analyzes the percentage of Medicare Part D beneficiaries 65 years or older who have received prescriptions for drugs with a high risk of serious side effects in the elderly. In order to advance patient safety, IEHP will be identifying members over 65 and currently on one of the medications identified in Table 1. Providers will be receiving a list of these members from IEHP on an ongoing basis. IEHP asks providers to review their member’s current drug regimen and safety risk and make any appropriate changes when applicable. Table 1: Medications identified by CMS to be high risk in the elderly: Drug Class Drug Safety Concerns IEHP Formulary Alternative(s) Acetylcholinesterase Donepezil (in patients Orthostatic hypotension or Memantine Inhibitor with syncope) bradycardia Amphetamines Dextroamphetamine CNS stimulation Weight Control: Diet Lisdextroamphetamine & lifestyle Diethylpropion modification Methylphenidate Phentermine Depression: mirtazapine, trazodone Analgesic Pentazocine Confusion, hallucination, Mild Pain: (includes Meperidine delirium, fall, fracture APAP combination Tramadol Lowers seizure threshold medications) Aspirin > 325 mg/day GI bleeding/peptic ulcer, edema Mod-Severe Pain Diflunisal may worsen heart failure Norco Etodolac Vicodin Fenoprofen Percocet Ketoprofen Morphine Meclofenamate Mefenamic acid Nabumetone 303 E.
    [Show full text]