DOCSLIB.ORG

Terrestrial Ecology

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Terrestrial Ecology CAIRNS SHIPPING DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Revised Draft Environmental Impact Statement Chapter B8: Terrestrial Ecology TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER B8: TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY _________________________________________ I B8.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................... 1 B8.1.1 Scope ............................................................................................................................................................................... 1 B8.1.2 Study Area and Project Areas ....................................................................................................................................... 1 B8.1.3 End use of DMPAs ......................................................................................................................................................... 3 B8.2 Methodology ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 B8.2.1 Detailed Technical Assessments .................................................................................................................................. 4 B8.2.2 Assessment Structure .................................................................................................................................................... 4 B8.2.3 Nomenclature and Terminology .................................................................................................................................... 5 B8.2.4 Literature Review ............................................................................................................................................................ 6 B8.2.5 Desktop Assessment ...................................................................................................................................................... 6 B8.2.6 Field Surveys ................................................................................................................................................................... 7 B8.2.7 Likelihood of Occurrence ............................................................................................................................................... 8 B8.3 Existing Situation................................................................................................................................................ 9 B8.3.1 Study Area and Project Areas Overview ..................................................................................................................... 9 B8.3.2 Matters of National Environmental Significance ....................................................................................................... 15 B8.3.3 Matters of State Environmental Significance ............................................................................................................ 31 B8.3.4 Other Commonwealth Matters .................................................................................................................................... 50 B8.3.5 Other State Matters ...................................................................................................................................................... 53 B8.3.6 Wildlife Corridors and Connectivity ............................................................................................................................ 61 B8.3.7 Exotic Flora .................................................................................................................................................................... 61 B8.3.8 Exotic Fauna .................................................................................................................................................................. 64 B8.4 Assessment of Potential Impacts .................................................................................................................. 65 B8.4.1 Impact Assessment Methodology............................................................................................................................... 65 B8.4.2 Assumptions .................................................................................................................................................................. 68 B8.4.3 MNES ............................................................................................................................................................................. 68 B8.4.4 MSES ............................................................................................................................................................................. 82 B8.4.5 Other Commonwealth Matters .................................................................................................................................... 88 B8.4.6 Other State Matters ...................................................................................................................................................... 88 B8.5 Recommended Mitigation Measures ............................................................................................................ 92 B8.5.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................... 92 B8.5.2 MNES ............................................................................................................................................................................. 93 B8.5.3 MSES ............................................................................................................................................................................. 95 B8.6 Residual Impacts and Assessment Summary ............................................................................................. 96 B8.6.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................... 96 B8.6.2 Summary ........................................................................................................................................................................ 96 B8.6.3 Discussion ...................................................................................................................................................................... 99 B8.6.4 Offsets .......................................................................................................................................................................... 100 B8.6.5 Monitoring .................................................................................................................................................................... 102 B8.7 References ...................................................................................................................................................... 103 (i) List of Figures Figure B8-1 Study Area and Project Areas. .............................................................................................................................. 2 Figure B8-2 Northern Sands DMPA......................................................................................................................................... 10 Figure B8-3 Northern Sands DMPA and pipelines. ............................................................................................................... 12 Figure B8-4 Tingira Street DMPA. ........................................................................................................................................... 14 Figure B8-5 EPBC Act Protected Matters search area. ........................................................................................................ 16 Figure B8-6 Location of mappable MNES in and near the Study Area. ............................................................................. 17 Figure B8-7 GBRWHA in the vicinity of the Northern Sands DMPA and pipeline. ........................................................... 20 Figure B8-8 GBRWHA in the vicinity of the Tingira Street DMPA. ...................................................................................... 21 Figure B8-9 Location of listed threatened ecological communities. .................................................................................... 29 Figure B8-10 Northern Sands Project Area MSES. ............................................................................................................... 33 Figure B8-11 Tingira Street Project Area MSES. ................................................................................................................... 34 Figure B8-12 GBRMP and GBRCMP zoning – Study Area. ................................................................................................ 36 Figure B8-13 Northern Sands Project Area marine park zoning. ........................................................................................ 37 Figure B8-14 Tingira Street Project Area marine park zoning and Coastal Management District. ................................. 38 Figure B8-15 Northern Sands Project Area remnant vegetation. ........................................................................................ 46 Figure B8-16 Northern Sands Project Area VM Act watercourses. ...................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Australia Lacks Stem Succulents but Is It Depauperate in Plants With
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Australia lacks stem succulents but is it depauperate in plants with crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM)? 1,2 3 3 Joseph AM Holtum , Lillian P Hancock , Erika J Edwards , 4 5 6 Michael D Crisp , Darren M Crayn , Rowan Sage and 2 Klaus Winter In the flora of Australia, the driest vegetated continent, [1,2,3]. Crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM), a water- crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM), the most water-use use efficient form of photosynthesis typically associated efficient form of photosynthesis, is documented in only 0.6% of with leaf and stem succulence, also appears poorly repre- native species. Most are epiphytes and only seven terrestrial. sented in Australia. If 6% of vascular plants worldwide However, much of Australia is unsurveyed, and carbon isotope exhibit CAM [4], Australia should host 1300 CAM signature, commonly used to assess photosynthetic pathway species [5]. At present CAM has been documented in diversity, does not distinguish between plants with low-levels of only 120 named species (Table 1). Most are epiphytes, a CAM and C3 plants. We provide the first census of CAM for the mere seven are terrestrial. Australian flora and suggest that the real frequency of CAM in the flora is double that currently known, with the number of Ellenberg [2] suggested that rainfall in arid Australia is too terrestrial CAM species probably 10-fold greater. Still unpredictable to support the massive water-storing suc- unresolved is the question why the large stem-succulent life — culent life-form found amongst cacti, agaves and form is absent from the native Australian flora even though euphorbs.
    [Show full text]
  • Literaturverzeichnis
    Literaturverzeichnis Abaimov, A.P., 2010: Geographical Distribution and Ackerly, D.D., 2009: Evolution, origin and age of Genetics of Siberian Larch Species. In Osawa, A., line ages in the Californian and Mediterranean flo- Zyryanova, O.A., Matsuura, Y., Kajimoto, T. & ras. Journal of Biogeography 36, 1221–1233. Wein, R.W. (eds.), Permafrost Ecosystems. Sibe- Acocks, J.P.H., 1988: Veld Types of South Africa. 3rd rian Larch Forests. Ecological Studies 209, 41–58. Edition. Botanical Research Institute, Pretoria, Abbadie, L., Gignoux, J., Le Roux, X. & Lepage, M. 146 pp. (eds.), 2006: Lamto. Structure, Functioning, and Adam, P., 1990: Saltmarsh Ecology. Cambridge Uni- Dynamics of a Savanna Ecosystem. Ecological Stu- versity Press. Cambridge, 461 pp. dies 179, 415 pp. Adam, P., 1994: Australian Rainforests. Oxford Bio- Abbott, R.J. & Brochmann, C., 2003: History and geography Series No. 6 (Oxford University Press), evolution of the arctic flora: in the footsteps of Eric 308 pp. Hultén. Molecular Ecology 12, 299–313. Adam, P., 1994: Saltmarsh and mangrove. In Groves, Abbott, R.J. & Comes, H.P., 2004: Evolution in the R.H. (ed.), Australian Vegetation. 2nd Edition. Arctic: a phylogeographic analysis of the circu- Cambridge University Press, Melbourne, pp. marctic plant Saxifraga oppositifolia (Purple Saxi- 395–435. frage). New Phytologist 161, 211–224. Adame, M.F., Neil, D., Wright, S.F. & Lovelock, C.E., Abbott, R.J., Chapman, H.M., Crawford, R.M.M. & 2010: Sedimentation within and among mangrove Forbes, D.G., 1995: Molecular diversity and deri- forests along a gradient of geomorphological set- vations of populations of Silene acaulis and Saxi- tings.
    [Show full text]
  • Mount Mackay National Park Management Statement 2013 (PDF
    Mount Mackay National Park Management Statement 2013 Legislative framework Park size: 3,680ha Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003 Environment Protection Biodiversity Conservation Act Bioregion: Wet Tropics 1999 (Cwlth) Native Title Act 1993 (Cwlth) QPWS region: Northern Nature Conservation Act 1992 Local government estate/area: Cassowary Coast Regional Wet Tropics World Heritage Protection and Management Act 1998 State electorate: Hinchinbrook Plans and agreements Far North Queensland (FNQ) regional plan National recovery plan for the Mahogany Glider Petaurus gracilis Recovery plan for the southern cassowary Casuarius casuarius johnsonii 2001–2005 Recovery plan for the stream-dwelling rainforest frogs of the Wet Tropics biogeographic region of north-east Queensland 2000–2004 Wet Tropics of Queensland World Heritage Area Regional Agreement 2005 Thematic strategies Draft Level 2 Pest Management Strategy Ant-plant Myrmecodia beccarii. Photo: NPRSR Vision Mount Mackay National Park provides a secure habitat for species of significance particularly for the mahogany glider and southern cassowary. Conservation purpose Mount Mackay National Park transferred from State forest in 2005. It protects numerous species of conservation significance and associated habitat for those species. Mount Mackay National Park Management Statement 2013 Protecting and presenting the park’s values Landscape Mount Mackay (724m) dominates the landscape on the park. The mountain is located on the western section of the park, facing Tully and the Tully Gorge National Park. Mount Douglas (339m) is on the eastern boundary of the park adjacent to Djiru National Park. The Tully Mission Beach Road (Cassowary Drive) passes through the park. Vehicles have been attributed to the death of many native animals, including the endangered southern cassowary Casuarius casuarius johnsonii.
    [Show full text]
  • Apollo Jewel Butterfly (Hypochrysops Apollo Miskin, 1891); Its Remarkable Hostplants and Ant Associations – John T Moss
    The intriguing Apollo Jewel butterfly (Hypochrysops apollo Miskin, 1891); its remarkable hostplants and ant associations – John T Moss This medium sized butterfly is one of 18 Australian Hypochrysops species in a genus of spectacularly coloured butterflies in the family Lycaenidae. There are a further 39 species scattered across the western Indonesian islands, Papua-New Guinea and the Solomons. The Apollo Jewel (wingspan: male 34 mm; female 36 mm) is one of the largest in the genus, and because of the bright orange livery of its upperside wings, one of the prettiest. Additionally, as in most species, the underside markings include iridescent pale blue lines and spots; thus the origin of the generic popular name “jewels”! There are three named subspecies: two, including the nominate (H. apollo apollo), in North Queensland and a further subspecies in PNG. We share one subspecies (H. apollo phoebus) with our northern neighbour. Parsons (1999), quoting Don Sands' 1986 Hypochrysops revisionary monograph, notes that “a specimen from Sulawesi and those from the Bismarcks, probably represent two additional races” bringing the total to 5 subspecies. Distribution and hostplants The southern (nominate) subspecies (H. apollo apollo) is restricted to the coastal area adjacent to the wet tropics and occurs from Cooktown south to Ingham, usually inhabiting melaleuca paperbark woodlands and wetlands, where the larval food plants (known as “ant-plants”) grow as bulbous epiphytes, particularly on the trunks and branches of papery-barked Melaleuca viridiflora and Lophostemon suaveolens. Near Cooktown and Innisfail, both butterfly and hostplants also occur commonly in mangroves (C. J. Muller, in Braby, 2000). However, the distribution is not continuous, as the Hypochrysops apollo apollo (male) Innisfail NQ populations are highly fragmented due to habitat loss from Photo Geoff Walker widespread land burning and clearing for sugar cane crops and pine plantations (Sands, 1990).
    [Show full text]
  • Cattana Wetlands Vegetation Management Plan
    Cattana Wetlands Vegetation Management Plan Cairns Regional Council Cairns Office: Townsville Office: Level 1, 320 Sheridan Street, Suite 2A, Level 1, 41 Denham Street, PO Box 5678 Cairns QLD 4870 PO Box 539 Townsville QLD 4810 P: 61 7 4034 5300 F: 61 7 4034 5301 P: 61 7 4796 9444 F: 61 7 4796 9410 www.natres.com.auwww.natres.com NRA Reference: Cover letter_L01 2 September 2016 Cairns Regional Council PO Box 359 CAIRNS QLD 4870 Attention: Luke Jackson, Parks and NR Strategic Planner Dear Luke RE: Cattana Wetlands Vegetation Management Plan (final report) Please find enclosed the Cattana Wetlands Vegetation Management Plan (final report). If you have any questions please feel free to contact me on (07) 4034 5300 or email at [email protected]. Yours sincerely NRA Environmental Consultants Shannon Wetherall CEO and Senior Environmental Scientist Encl: Cattana Wetlands Vegetation Management Plan (final report) © Natural Resource Assessments Pty Ltd This document is the property of Natural Resource Assessments Pty Ltd. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, all other rights are reserved. Unauthorised use of this document in any form whatsoever is prohibited. F:\AAA\154_CRC\154027-Cattana Veg Mgt Plan\rpt\Cover letter_L01.docx Natural Resource Assessments Pty Ltd trading as NRA Environmental Consultants. ABN: 77 011 073 135 Certified Integrated Management System: AS/NZS ISO 9001:2008 (Quality), AS/NZS ISO 14001:2004 (Environment), AS/NZS 4801:2001 (Safety). Document Control Summary NRA Environmental Consultants F:\AAA\154_CRC\154027-Cattana Veg Mgt Job No: Plan\rpt\CattanaWetlands_VMP_R02.docx Status: Final Project Manager: Shannon Wetherall Title: Cattana Wetlands Vegetation Management Plan Author/s: Shakira Todd Client: Cairns Regional Council and GGI Architects Client Contact: Luke Jackson (Parks and NR Strategic Management, CRC) Date of Issue: 2 September 2016 No.
    [Show full text]
  • Listing Advice for Broad Leaf Tea-Tree (Melaleuca Viridiflora) Woodlands
    Advice to the Minister for Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities from the Threatened Species Scientific Committee (the Committee) on an Amendment to the List of Threatened Ecological Communities under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) 1. Name of the ecological community Broad leaf tea-tree (Melaleuca viridiflora) woodlands in high rainfall coastal north Queensland This ecological community was nominated for listing as threatened under the EPBC Act as part of a process to streamline the listing of state endemic ecological communities under federal and state processes. This advice follows assessment of information provided by the Queensland Department of Environment and Resource Management, other available information and consultation. The name of the ecological community is Broad leaf tea-tree (Melaleuca viridiflora) woodlands in high rainfall coastal north Queensland. The name was suggested by the Queensland Department of Environment and Resource Management as best describing the dominant species, structure and location that characterise the ecological community. 2. Public consultation Experts were consulted throughout the assessment period and an extract of the draft listing advice was made available for public exhibition and comment for a minimum 30 business days. The Committee has had regard to all public and expert comment that was relevant to the consideration of the ecological community. 3. Summary of conservation assessment by the Committee The Committee provides the following assessment of the appropriateness of the ecological community’s inclusion in the EPBC Act list of threatened ecological communities. The Committee judges that the ecological community has been demonstrated to have met sufficient elements of Criterion 1 to make it eligible for listing as vulnerable; Criterion 2 to make it eligible for listing as endangered; Criterion 4 to make it eligible for listing as endangered.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Ant Mutualism on the Foraging and Diet of L Ycaenid
    The Effects of Am MwulI/is/Il I 405 12 1990a, b; Fiedler and Maschwitz 1988, 1989a, b; Nash 1990; Savignano 1990; Baylis and Pierce 1991 b). Our discussion here concentrates mainly on these mutualistic associations . The Effects of Ant Mutualism This chapter will examine the nature of the nutritional hurdles imposed by on the Foraging and Diet Iycaenid-ant mutualisms and the responses of Iycaenids to those challenges. We wi ll begin with a brief overview of some of the effects that ants may have had of L ycaenid Caterpillars on the dietary choices of Iycaenid butterflies . We will then focus our discussion on la/menus evagoras, the species that has been the subject of our research in Matthew Baylis and Naomi E. Pierce this area, and evaluate some of the physiological constraints imposed by the need to secrete rewards for ants as well as evidence for physiological and behavioral responses to these constraints. Ants involved in Iycaenid-ant interactions typically obtain their food from a variety of sources, and no relationships have been described in which attendant ants rely entirely on the secretions of Iycaenid larvae for sustenance. However, Introduction Iycaenids vary considerably in the strength of their associations with attendant ants. In some species, larvae appear to appease ants but have no other direct interactions with them; in others, perhaps the majori ty, larvae not only appease Larvae of species in at least 10 families of the Lepidoptera associate with ants ants, but are intermittently tended by any of a large number of different species; (Hinton 1951; Maschwitz et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Approved Conservation Advice for Myrmecodia Beccarii
    This Conservation Advice was approved by the Minister / Delegate of the Minister on: 16/12/2008 Approved Conservation Advice (s266B of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999) Approved Conservation Advice for Myrmecodia beccarii This Conservation Advice has been developed based on the best available information at the time this Conservation Advice was approved; this includes existing plans, records or management prescriptions for this species. Description Myrmecodia beccarii, Family Rubiaceae, also known as Ant Plant, is a tuberous epiphyte. Tubers are irregularly cylindrical, 30 cm long, 21 cm wide, pale grey and covered in short, stout spines borne on mounds with pore and entrance holes absent. Within the tuber chambers up to 1 cm across occur with 0.5–1.5 cm of tissue between chambers. Several stems arise from the tuber and are freely branched, up to 15 cm long and 3 cm wide. Leaves are fleshy and succulent, elliptic to oblanceolate, 1–9 cm long, 1.4–4.5 cm wide and pale green on stalks 3-45 mm long. Flowers are white, about 1 cm long, with a ring of hairs just below the middle of the tube. Anthers are near the opening of the tube and blue coloured, and the style is 4- lobed. Fruit are white, up to 13 mm long, 5 mm wide and contain four pyrenes (Huxley & Jebb, 1993; Forster, 2000). This species has a unique association with the Golden Ant (Iridiomyrmex cordatus) and the Apollo Jewel butterfly (Hypochrysops apollo apollo) (Forster, 2000). Conservation Status Myrmecodia beccarii is listed as vulnerable. This species is eligible for listing as vulnerable under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cwlth) (EPBC Act) as, prior to the commencement of the EPBC Act, it was listed as vulnerable under Schedule 1 of the Endangered Species Protection Act 1992 (Cwlth).
    [Show full text]
  • • Nomination of Wet Tropical Rainforests of North-East Australia
    Nomination of WET TROPICAL RAINFORESTS OF NORTH-EAST AUSTRALIA by the Government of Australia for inclusion in the WORLD HERITAGE LIST Prepared by Department of the Arts, Sport, the Environment, Tourism and Territories December 19~7 UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE WORLD HERITAGE LIST Nomination Form Under the terms of the Convention concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage, adopted by the General Conference of Unesco in 1972, the Intergovernmental Committee for the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage, called "the World Heritage Committee" shall establish under the title of "World Heritage List", a list of properties forming part of the cultural and natural heritage which it considers as having outstanding universal value in terms of such criteria it shall have established. The purpose of this form is to enable State Parties to submit to the World Heritage . Committee nominations of properties situated in their territory and suitable for inclusion in the World Heritage List. Notes to assist in completing each page of the form are provided opposite the page to be completed. Please type entries in the spaces available. Additional information may be provided on pages attached to the form. It should be noted that the World Heritage Committee will retain all supporting documentation (maps, plans, photographic material, etc.) submitted with the nomination form. The form completed in English or French should be sent in three copies to: The Secretariat World Heritage Committee Division of Cultural Heritage Unesco 7 Place de Fontenoy 757000 Paris J J J .
    [Show full text]
  • Jackson, Stephen Matthew (1998) Foraging Ecology, Behaviour and Management of the Mahogany Glider Petaurus Gracilis
    This file is part of the following reference: Jackson, Stephen Matthew (1998) Foraging ecology, behaviour and management of the mahogany glider Petaurus gracilis. PhD thesis, James Cook University. Access to this file is available from: http://eprints.jcu.edu.au/17428 Foraging Ecology, Behaviour and Management of the Mahogany Glider Petaurus gracilis Thesis Submitted by Stephen Matthew Jackson M. Sc. in April 1998 In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Zoology and Tropical Ecology of James Cook University of North Queensland. The Glirlil/g Ability of Petallri£is. "On board a vessel sailing off the coast of New Holland was a Squirrel PelaurIls, which was permitted to roam about the ship . On one occasion it reached the mast-head, and as the sailor who was despatched to bring it down approached, it made a spring from aloR to avoid him. At this moment the ship gave a heavy lu rch, which, if the original di rection of the li ttl e creatures course had been continu ed, must have plunged it into the sea. All w ho witnessed the scene were in pain fo r its safety; but it suddenly appeared to check itself, and so to modifY its career that it ali ghted safe ly on the deck". From: Penny Cyclopedia (1839) Marsupiali a, Charles Knight & Co. Vol xiv p. -160 --161. A Mahogany Glider' Launching Into a Gl id e. Phuto by John Young ii Statement of Access I, the undersigned, the author of this thesis, understand that James Cook University of North Queensland will make it available for use within the University Library and, by microfilm or other photographic means, allow access to users in other approved libraries.
    [Show full text]
  • Consistent Patterns of Fungal Communities Within Ant-Plants Across a Large Geographic Range Strongly Suggest a Multipartite Mutu
    Consistent patterns of fungal communities within ant-plants across a large geographic range strongly suggest a multipartite mutualism Melinda Greenfield1, Lori Lach1, Brad Congdon1, Sten Anslan2, Leho Tedersoo2, Matt Field1, and Sandra Abell3 1James Cook University - Cairns Campus 2University of Tartu 3Australian Tropical Herbarium, James Cook University September 11, 2020 Abstract In recent decades, multipartite mutualisms involving microorganisms such as fungi have been discovered in associations tra- ditionally thought of as bipartite. Ant-plant mutualisms were long thought to be bipartite despite fungi being noticed in an epiphytic ant-plant over 100 years ago. We sequenced fungal DNA from the three distinct domatium chambers of the epiphytic ant-plant Myrmecodia beccarii Hook.f. to establish if fungal communities differ by chamber type across five locations spanning 675 km. The three chamber types serve different ant-associated functions including: `waste' chambers, where ant workers deposit waste; `nursery' chambers, where the brood are kept; and `ventilation' chambers, that allow air into the domatium. Overall, fungi from the order Chaetothyriales dominated the chambers in terms of the proportion of OTUs (13.4%) and sequence abundances of OTUs (28% of the total), however a large portion of OTUs (28%) were unidentified at the order level. Notably, the fungal community in the waste chambers differed consistently from the nursery and ventilation chambers across all five locations. We identified 13 fungal OTUs as `common' in the waste chambers that were rare or in very low sequence abundance in the other two chambers. Fungal communities in the nursery and ventilation chambers were also significantly different, but variation between these chambers was less pronounced.
    [Show full text]
  • Redden Island “Dungarra” Checklist of Plants
    Redden Island “Dungarra” Checklist of Plants Redden Island Checklist of Plants Family Code Taxon Common Name FERNS & ALLIES Adiantaceae Cheilanthes tenuifolia Rock Fern Polypodiaceae Drynaria rigidula Basket Fern Drynaria sparsisora Platycerium hillii Northern Elkhorn Fern GYMNOSPERMS Cycadaceae Cycas media subsp. banksii Cycad Palm FLOWERING PLANTS-DICOTYLEDONS Aizoaceae Sesuvium portulacastrum Sea Purslane Anacardiaceae Buchanania arborescens Satinwood Euroschinus falcatus var. falcatus Blush Cudgerie or Pink Poplar Pleiogynium timorense Burdekin Plum Semecarpus australiensis Tar Tree Annonaceae Polyalthia nitidissima Canary Beech Apocynaceae Alstonia muelleriana Hard Milkwood Alyxia spicata Chain Fruit * Catharanthus roseus Periwinkle Cynanchum carnosum Dischidia nummularia Button Orchid Gymnanthera oblonga Harpoon Bud Ichnocarpus frutescens Secamone elliptica Corky Milk Vine Tabernaemontana orientalis Eastern Gondola Bush Araliaceae Polyscias elegans Celerywood Saturday, 2 July 2011 Redden Island Checklist of Plants RLJ Page 1 of 7 R.L. Jago Page 1 Redden Island “Dungarra” Checklist of Plants Family Code Taxon Common Name Asteraceae * Emilia sonchifolia var. sonchifolia Emilia Epaltes australis Epaltes * Praxelis clematidea Praxelis Pterocaulon sphacelatum *C3 Sphagneticola trilobata Singapore Daisy * Tridax procumbens Tridax Daisy Burseraceae Canarium australianum var. australianum Scrub Turpentine; Mangobark Caesalpiniaceae Caesalpinia bonduc Nicker Nit * Cassia fistula Golden Shower Tree Cynometra iripa Wrinkle Pod Mangrove Capparaceae
    [Show full text]