DOCSLIB.ORG

2004 Lake Superior Term4.0.Qxd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2004 Lake Superior Term4.0.Qxd 2004 Minnesota's Lake Superior Terminals PORT AND WATERWAYS SECTION MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Foreward The Ports and Waterways Section of the Minnesota Department of Transportation has prepared this terminal directory to pro- vide information about Minnesota’s Lake Superior terminals. This directory includes information on the 33 terminals in Duluth–Superior, Two Harbors, Silver Bay, and Taconite Harbor. Information on Superior, Wisconsin terminals is included because Duluth and Superior share one Harbor. Terminals are arranged in the directory by location in each harbor, beginning with those in Duluth proceeding to Superior and then moving north along Minnesota’s North Shore to Two Harbors, Silver Bay, and Taconite Harbor. The index presents an geographical list- ing of the terminals. Information for each terminal includes cargo handled, pier length, depth along dock, storage, equipment, rail–truck access, and the name of a contact person. Information included in this directory was obtained from terminal operators and the Seaway Port Authority of Duluth. The pho- tographs of the terminals in Two Harbors, Silver Bay, and Taconite Harbor were obtained from the Canal Park Marine Museum in Duluth. The photograph of the Murphy Oil Main Terminal was obtained from Grandmaison Studios of Duluth. The cover picture of the M/V Roger Blough was courtesy of Kenneth R. Newhams, Duluth Shipping News. For other boat pic- tures, contact Mr Newhams at 218-722-3119 or E-mail: [email protected]. To Order Minnesota’s Lake Superoir Terminals booklet Dick Lambert Ports and Waterways Section Phone: 651–406-4805 Fax: 651–406-4811 Email: [email protected] Acknowledgements Kim Lanahan–Lahti Layout Design Spring 2004 Duluth / Superior Harbor Lake Superior 1 31 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 11 30 9 12 29 13 27 28 10 26 14 DULUTH TERMINALS 25 24 Lafarge North America Inc. 1 Cutler–Magner Company Salt Dock . 2 General Mills Elevator A . 3 Cargill Grain Elevator B (South) (Receiving Dock) . 4 Cargill Shipping Dock (North) . 5 23 AGP Grain, LTD . 6 Azcon Corporation . 7 16 22 Northland Bituminous Northland Constructors, LLC. 8 15 21 Arthur M. Clure Public Marine Terminal – Garfield Docks C & D . 9 Arthur M. Clure Public Marine Terminal Berths 1 & 2 (Operated by Lake Superior 17 Warehousing Co., Inc.) . 10 Terminal Berth 3 Murphy Oil Marine Terminal . 11 Arthur M. Clure Public Marine Terminal Berth 4 (Operated by Lake Superior Warehousing Co., Inc.) . 12 Arthur M. Clure Public Marine Terminal Berths 5 & 6 (Operated by Lake Superior Warehousing Co., Inc.) . St. Lawrence Cement Holcim Inc. 14 Duluth, Missabe, And Iron Range Railway Ore Dock 5 . 15 Duluth, Missabe, And Iron Range Railway Ore Dock 6 . 16 Hallett Dock No. 5 . 17 C. Reiss Coal Co. Duluth Dock . 18 Hallett Dock No. 7 . 19 Hallett Dock 6 . 20 SUPERIOR TERMINALS Hallett Dock 8 . 23 Midwest Energy Resources Co. Superior Midwest Energy Terminal . 24 Cenex Harvest States No. 1 and Gallery . 25 Cenex Harvest States No. 2 . 26 18 Northway Carriers Inc. (Connors Point Pier) . 27 Peavey Connor’s Point Elevator . 28 CLM Limestone Dock & Lime Manufacturing Operation (Subsidiary of Cutler–Magner Co.) . 29 19 Lafarge North America Inc. 30 Con Agra Elevator M. 31 20 Table of Contents Duluth Terminals Lafarge North America Inc. .1 Cutler–Magner Company Salt Dock . .2 General Mills Elevator A . .3 Cargill Grain Elevator B (South) (Receiving Dock) . .4 Cargill Shipping Dock (North) . .5 AGP Grain, LTD . .6 Azcon Corporation . .7 Northland Bituminous Northland Constructors, LLC. .8 Arthur M. Clure Public Marine Terminal – Garfield Docks C & D . .9 Arthur M. Clure Public Marine Terminal Berths 1 & 2 (Operated by Lake Superior Warehousing Co., Inc.) . .10 Terminal Berth 3 Murphy Oil Marine Terminal . .11 Arthur M. Clure Public Marine Terminal Berth 4 (Operated by Lake Superior Warehousing Co., Inc.) . .12 Arthur M. Clure Public Marine Terminal Berths 5 & 6 (Operated by Lake Superior Warehousing Co., Inc.) . .13 St. Lawrence Cement Holcim Inc. .14 Duluth, Missabe, And Iron Range Railway Ore Dock 5 . .15 Duluth, Missabe, And Iron Range Railway Ore Dock 6 . .16 Hallett Dock No. 5 . .17 C. Reiss Coal Co. Duluth Dock . .18 Hallett Dock No. 7 . .19 Hallett Dock 6 . .20 Superior Terminals Hallett Dock 8 . .23 Midwest Energy Resources Co. Superior Midwest Energy Terminal . .24 Cenex Harvest States No. 1 and Gallery . .25 Cenex Harvest States No. 2 . .26 Northway Carriers Inc. (Connors Point Pier) . .27 Peavey Connor’s Point Elevator . .28 CLM Limestone Dock & Lime Manufacturing Operation (Subsidiary of Cutler–Magner Co.) . .29 Lafarge North America Inc. .30 Con Agra Elevator M . .31 Burlington Northern Santa Fe Ore Dock No. 5 . .32 Two Harbors Terminals Duluth, Missabe, and Iron Range Railway Dock No. 2 . .35 Duluth, Missabe, And Iron Range Railway Ore Dock 1 . .36 Silver Bay Terminals Northshore Mining Company . ..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit ______No
    In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19-3129 WISCONSIN CENTRAL LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. No. 1:16-cv-04271 — Andrea R. Wood, Judge. ____________________ ARGUED SEPTEMBER 25, 2020 — DECIDED MARCH 31, 2021 ____________________ Before RIPPLE, BRENNAN, and ST. EVE, Circuit Judges. BRENNAN, Circuit Judge. Decades ago, railroad company Wisconsin Central, Ltd. entered into an agreement that included the purchase of rail lines from Soo Line Railroad Company. Part of that agreement allocated responsibility for future environmental liabilities. Years later, contamination was discovered near one of those lines in Ashland, Wisconsin on the shore of Lake Superior. 2 No. 19-3129 The railroads jointly defended and settled responsibility for the investigation and remediation of that site. Then they each sought indemnification from the other. The district court awarded summary judgment to Soo Line for damages, attor- neys’ fees, and costs. On appeal, the railroads dispute when a claim was first asserted, and how much of the cost of defending and settling the matter was related to the rail lines and their operation. In- demnification under the agreement turns on both issues. I. In a 1987 Asset Purchase Agreement (“Agreement”) Wis- consin Central purchased various assets of Soo Line’s Lake States Transportation division, including physical rail lines in Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Michigan (“LST”).1 The Agree- ment provided for a detailed allocation of liability and indem- nification of each party by the other.
    [Show full text]
  • A Steel-Hulled Bulk Freighter Measuring 610.9 in Length, with a Beam of 60.0 Feet, and a Depth of Hold of 32.6 Feet
    NFS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. 8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL National Register of Historic Places REGISTER Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual properties or districts. See instructions in Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, styles, materials, and areas of significance, enter only the categories and subcategories listed in the instructions. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900a). Type all entries. 1. Name of Property_________________________________________________ historic name Freighter WILLIAM A. IRVIN other names/site number N/A 2. Location street & number Minnesota Slip. Duluth Harbor I_| not for publication N/A city, town Duluth I I vicinity N/A state Minnesota code MN county St . Louis code 137 zip code 55802 3. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property I I private I I building(s) Contributing Noncontributing I~x1 public-local I I district ____buildings I I public-State I I site ____ sites I I public-Federal Pn structure ____ structures I I object ____ objects ____Total Name of related multiple property listing: Number of contributing resources previously listed in the National Register _Q______ 4. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this S nomination EH request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]
  • Ashland, Wisconsin a Coastal Community Smart Growth Case Study Author: Rebecca Pearson Editor: Victoria Pebbles, Great Lakes Commission
    Ashland, Wisconsin A Coastal Community Smart Growth Case Study Author: Rebecca Pearson Editor: Victoria Pebbles, Great Lakes Commission Ashland is a close. The busy small port and the community in shipping industry northeastern that served it went Wisconsin, from moving located on millions of tons of Chequamegon iron ore, Bay on the brownstone and southwest shore lumber to an of Lake occasional Superior. shipment of coal. Endowed with By 2009, the an abundance of Canadian National natural Railway which resources (timber, water, iron ore and acquired Wisconsin Central was the only railroad brownstone) and access to the Great Lakes, the service in Ashland. city of Ashland flourished as a port in the 1800s where raw and processed natural materials where As industries declined, so did the population. shipped to urban areas elsewhere in the Great Ashland lost population at a rate of about 5 Lakes region. At that time, Ashland’s waterfront percent every decade from the early 1900s until was developed to serve the industries that the 1990s. From 1990 to 2000, Ashland’s supported the processing and transport of natural population began to stabilize with only a 0.8 resources, such as sawmills, lumberyards and iron percent decline. According to the 2000 U.S. docks. Supporting commercial development grew Census, Ashland’s population is just over 8,600. up south of the waterfront, while residential development occurred still south of the Like many post-war cities and towns across the commercial area. Great Lakes region and elsewhere in the U.S, while the city itself contracted, the surrounding Railroads also played an important role in towns and rural areas of Ashland County, Ashland’s growth from the late 1800s into the experienced a 3.4 percent population increase early 1900s.
    [Show full text]
  • 933-2966 Hulett I Sheet 5/5/09 1:41 PM Page 1
    933-2966 Hulett I sheet 5/5/09 1:41 PM Page 1 HO Scale Structure Kit 933-2966 HULETT UNLOADER Thanks for purchasing this Cornerstone Series® Missabe Range in the early 1890s. Vessels again Realizing that something had to be done the kit. All parts are styrene, so use compatible glue grew, reaching 475' (144.7m) by 1897. Once industry developed new methods to process and paint with your model. Please read these again, the stage was set for a new generation of taconite, introducing the first pellets in 1955. instructions and study the drawings before unloading machinery. starting. Huletts had no trouble handling the new marble- A radical new unloader appeared in 1899, the sized pellets — but neither did boats equipped While iron ore was discovered in Michigan’s brainchild of engineer George Hulett, on the with self-unloading machinery. First used on the upper peninsula in 1844, it took decades to docks of the Carnegie Steel Company in lakes in 1902, belt unloaders had proven well develop efficient ways to deliver it to eastern Conneaut, Ohio. Steam powered and rated at suited to coal and limestone, and allowed vessels furnaces by rail and water. In 1852, the first 275 tons per hour, the unit was constructed as an to unload quickly at virtually any desired large shipment, roughly 2 tons (1.8 MT), arrived experiment, but proved so successful that location. Natural ore had proved troublesome in Cleveland in barrels! But when the Sault St. additional examples were soon in use, and in with these units, and the general feeling was that Marie canal opened three years later, the stage 1904, the 540' (164.5m) long Augustus P.
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan's Railroad History
    Contributing Organizations The Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) wishes to thank the many railroad historical organizations and individuals who contributed to the development of this document, which will update continually. Ann Arbor Railroad Technical and Historical Association Blue Water Michigan Chapter-National Railway Historical Society Detroit People Mover Detroit Public Library Grand Trunk Western Historical Society HistoricDetroit.org Huron Valley Railroad Historical Society Lansing Model Railroad Club Michigan Roundtable, The Lexington Group in Transportation History Michigan Association of Railroad Passengers Michigan Railroads Association Peaker Services, Inc. - Brighton, Michigan Michigan Railroad History Museum - Durand, Michigan The Michigan Railroad Club The Michigan State Trust for Railroad Preservation The Southern Michigan Railroad Society S O October 13, 2014 Dear Michigan Residents: For more than 180 years, Michigan’s railroads have played a major role in the economic development of the state. This document highlights many important events that have occurred in the evolution of railroad transportation in Michigan. This document was originally published to help celebrate Michigan’s 150th birthday in 1987. A number of organizations and individuals contributed to its development at that time. The document has continued to be used by many since that time, so a decision was made to bring it up to date and keep the information current. Consequently, some 28 years later, the Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) has updated the original document and is placing it on our website for all to access. As you journey through this history of railroading in Michigan, may you find the experience both entertaining and beneficial. MDOT is certainly proud of Michigan’s railroad heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • Chocolay Township History Then And
    n ... I ' J r ' l r ' r ) J l I : J J; J' ' J. On the cover: this photograph was taken on top of the "Rock Cut" on March 6, 2008 at 11 :00 a.m. by Tom Shaw. In response to why this place, Tom answered: "Exercise, fresh air, beauty, quiet time with Him, to step back and look at the big picture and because I can. The best short answer is that I love it. The view brings me back to simpler times." CHOCOLAY TOWNSHIP . .. Just the combination of those two words CHOCOLAY TOWNSHIP brings some vision to your mind. It may be the one on the cover of this booklet or any of the various scenes throughout the other pages. All of them are special to someone, but whatever picture comes to your mind and the fact that you are reading this booklet reinforces that this is a special place for you. As you read this historical writing, I just want to join you in thanking the dozens of people who made it possible. First the township board located a woman, Elizabeth Delene who had the gift for writing and arranging the many contributions that came her way. Elizabeth, thank you for making the time to put these facts in a very readable form! Next on the list of volunteers is Cathy Phelps from the township office. She went above and beyond the call of duty to solicit information and assist Elizabeth in putting together this manuscript. A local committee of Lula Sarka, Elry Reetz, Marilyn Heitman, and Ben Mukkala were ever ready to assist joined together to read the facts, and add comments and reach out for additional information to make this a factual, fascinating piece.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of Mining in Michigan's Marquette and Menominee Iron
    A Brief History of Mining in Michigan’s Marquette and Menominee Iron Ranges The Upper Peninsula of Michigan, the “U.P.” as the locals call it, has been blessed with a wealth of mineral resources. The Native Americans were the earliest miners, using float copper left behind by the receding glaciers to make implements of many types. Copper trade goods eventually made their way throughout the Mississippi River watershed. Douglas Houghton visited copper deposits on his 1831-32 expedition. He became Michigan’s first State Geologist in 1839. His reports on the copper deposits in 1841, made the public aware of the resource potential of the U.P. Although he did not personally visit the iron deposits, he reported their existence. William Austin Burt, a government surveyor, is credited with the discovery of iron ore near Negaunee in 1844. This would become known as the Marquette Iron Range. In 1845, the Jackson Iron Company, with help from the Native Americans, discovered an iron deposit in another location that was to become the town of Negaunee. This deposit became the Jackson Mine. Ore was mined from an open pit. The Carp River Forge was opened in 1847 near Negaunee. It utilized ore from the Jackson Mine. The Michigan Iron Industry Museum, near the site of the forge, will be visited during the 2019 Mining History Association conference. Other Michigan iron ore discoveries followed as prospectors gained a better understanding of the geology and pushed into unexplored territory. Marquette Range, 1844 Eastern Menominee Range, 1845 Gogebic Range, 1848 Western Menominee Range, 1851 Gwinn District, Marquette Range, 1869 By comparison, the earliest iron ore discoveries in Minnesota occurred over 30 years later than the first discovery in Michigan.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Negaunee Master Plan
    City of Negaunee Marquette County, Michigan 2016 Community Master Plan Negaunee Master Plan 2015 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Negaunee Master Plan 2015 Acknowledgements This plan could not have been developed without the collaboration and cooperation between community leaders, businesses, and residents. The people listed below dedicated their expertise and many hours of their time in order to complete this project. City of Negaunee Staff City Council Jeff Thornton, City Manager Dawn Schuhkencht, Mayor Bruce Houghton, City Attorney Nick Visser Ann Ducoli, Secretary Toby Smith Bill Brazier, Jackson Mine Market Coordinator David Kangas, Mayor Pro Tem Derek Dushane, Recreation Director Martin Saari Gerald Koski, DPW Supervisor Jason Wallner Jay Frusti, Chief of Police Don Gladwell Planning Commission Recreation Commission Richard Uren Jeff Rodgers Karen Hakala Gerald Corkin Jon Becker Anna Mattson David Oglesby John Thomas Jeff Gardyko Larry Peterson Janice Chittle Negaunee Master Plan 2015 Table of Contents 1. Introduction.......................................................................................................1 2. Community Overview....................................................................................2 2.1 Previous Plans..................................................................................3 2.2 History.................................................................................................5 2.3 Historic Resources and Landmarks..........................................6 3. People of Negaunee....................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Interview with John Marshall Iron Ore Industry Employee Location: Marquette, Michigan May 1St, 2007
    Interview with John Marshall Iron Ore Industry Employee Location: Marquette, Michigan May 1st, 2007 START OF INTERVEIW Joshua Cowpla [Spelled phonetically]: This is Joshua Cowpla, interviewing John Marshall, the date is May 1st, 2007. Alright. I already asked your name. What is your date of birth? John Marshall (JM): 1/25/45. JC: Place of birth? JM: Hancock, Michigan. JC: Alright. JM: Actually Houghton, Michigan. But you can’t be born in Houghton you have to be born in Hancock because that’s where the hospital is. But I consider my hometown there, so. JC: Alright. For how long did you work in the mining industry in this area? JM: Actually, I worked in the mining industry for about 38 years. In this area, 30 years with Cleveland Cliffs. JC: Alright. How had the job changed over that 30-year span? Your specific job, how did it progress? JM: My specific job? JC: Yep. JM: I actually started out with Kennecott and went through a variety of positions, primarily lower management positions, foreman type positions. Then I took a job back here in 1973 with Cleveland Cliffs and the Republic Mine as a mining engineer in the mining engineering department. I progressed from there up, what was called a General Foreman, Pit General Foreman. and I was actually Pit General Foreman for several years. A Pit General Foreman basically runs the pit area under the Pit Supervisor. I then was asked to go to Cleveland in 1976 and I went down to Cleveland for 8 years and I was Assistant to the Senior Vice President of Operations and also was promoted while I was down there to Senior Staff Engineer.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Development Action Plan
    ABSTRACT As a component of the required best practices for state certification as a Redevelopment Ready Community, and as directed by Section 13-6 of the Marquette City Charter adopted in 2012, this economic development action plan includes a brief description of the City’s history, demographic information, regional context, relationship to other City plans and priority economic development related goals and strategies for achieving them. The City of Marquette’s status as a regional hub for healthcare, business, recreation and academics allows for multiple opportunities to encourage and support ECONOMIC sustainable economic development. Adopted by the Marquette City DEVELOPMENT Commission on September 9, 2019 ACTION PLAN CITY OF MARQUETTE Introduction Historical Context The village of Marquette, originally New Worcester, began on September 14, 1849, with the formation of the Marquette Iron Company. On August 21, 1850, the name was changed to honor Jacques Marquette, the French Jesuit missionary who had explored the region. The Marquette Iron Company failed, while its successor, the Cleveland Iron Mining Company (now Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.), flourished and had the village platted in 1854. Marquette was then incorporated as a village in 1859 and as a city in 1871. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has remained a consistent economic fixture in Marquette County. The ore dock in Marquette’s Lower Harbor was originally built in 1859 and, until 1876, Marquette was the only port on Lake Superior that shipped iron ore. A second dock was built in Marquette’s Upper Harbor in 1912 and the Lower Harbor dock was updated to its current state in 1932. The Lower Harbor dock was decommissioned in 1971 but the Upper Harbor dock remains active to this day.
    [Show full text]
  • L-44-305 M-174 June 7, 1944 to the Director of Retirement Claims
    L-44-305 M-174 # June 7, 1944 TO The Director of Retirement Claims FROM The General Counsel SUBJECT Creditability of service rendered under ore dock operations contract between Addison Miller, Inc. (Minnesota) and Lake Superior and Ishpeming Railroad Company In response to your request I herewith submit my opinion on the following: QUESTION Is service rendered under contract between Addison Miller, Inc. and Lake Superior and Ishpeming Railroad Company covering ore dock operations at Presque Isle, in the City of Marquette, Michigan, creditable under the Railroad Retirement and Railroad Unemployment Insurance Acts? OPINION It is my opinion that the service in question is creditable as "employee" service rendered to Lake Superior and Ishpeming Railroad Company. It is my further opinion that even if it were determined that the ore dock operations have been conducted by Addison Miller, Inc. independently, the individuals performing the contract work would, nevertheless, be covered under the Railroad Retirement and Railroad Unemployment Insurance Acts since, in that event, Addison Miller, Inc., with respect to such operations, would itself be an "employer" under the Acts as a carrier by railroad subject to Part I of the Inter­ state Commerce Act. DISCUSSION On February 5» 1925, the Lake Superior and Ishpeming Railroad Company entered into a contract with Addison Miller, Inc., a corpora­ tion organized under the laws of Minnesota, for the operation, during the shipping season of 1925, 1926 and 1927, of the Railroad's iron ore -2- The Director of Retirement Claims docks situated at Presque Isle, in the City of Marquette, Michigan. The ore dock operations, performed under tariffs filed by the Railroad Company with the Interstate Commerce Commission, consist of the unload­ ing of iron ore from railroad cars spotted on the Railroad's dock into ore pockets located thereon, and the loading of the ore from the pockets into the holds of vessels waiting at the ore docks to receive the ore for transportation to various Great Lake ports.
    [Show full text]
  • Cleveland Harbor, Operations and Maintenance, Cuyahoga County, Ohio
    FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT Cleveland Harbor Operations & Maintenance Cuyahoga County, Ohio Prepared by U. S. Army Engineer District, Buffalo, NY April 1974 ■ STATEMENT OF FINDINGS OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE OF CLEVELAND HARBOR Cuyahoga County, Ohio I have reviewed and evaluated, in the light of the overall public interest, the documents concerning the proposed action, as well as the stated views of other interested agencies and the concerned public, relative to the various practicable alternatives in accomplishing operations and maintenance of Cleveland Harbor, Ohio. The possible consequences of these alternatives have been studied according to environmental, social well-being and economic effects, including regional and national development, and engineering feasibility. In evaluation, the following points were considered pertinent: a. Environmental considerations. Dredging Cleveland Harbor to authorized project depths and maintenance to piers and breakwaters makes possible the continued safe navigation in the area. Annual dredging results in temporary increases in turbidity and suspended solids and a decrease of water quality in the project area. Disturbed benthic habitat also results from each year's dredging which impacts upon developing flora and fauna. Periodic breakwater and pier maintenance causes transient dust and noise level increases. Disposal of polluted Cleveland Harbor sediment in Lake Erie open water is undesirable and is opposed by many agencies. Consequently, since 1968, dredged river material has been placed in pilot disposal areas. These sites do not have sufficient capacity to accommodate all the material to be dredged in 1974. Delay in completion of Disposal Site 12, a 2 1/2-3 year capacity area, until August, 1974 may require that strong consideration be given to open-lake disposal of 50,000 cubic yards of polluted, river summer shoaling material (Disposal Site 12 was originally scheduled for completion in April, 1974, but has been delayed due to difficulty in obtaining properly-graded stone material).
    [Show full text]