DOCSLIB.ORG

Minnesota Architecture - History Inventory Form

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

MINNESOTA ARCHITECTURE - HISTORY INVENTORY FORM Project: Local Historic Bridge Study - Phase II Duluth, St. Louis County, Minnesota Identification SHPO Inventory Number SL-DUL-3143 Historic Name DM&N/DM&IR Ore Dock 6 Approach Review and Compliance Number Current Name DM&N/DM&IR Ore Dock 6 Approach Form (New or Updated) New Field # Description Address Ore Dock 6 Approach over Multiple Streets Linear Feature? Yes Linear Length: 1.1 miles City/Twp Duluth HPC Status: Unknown County St. Louis Resource Type Structure Architect/Engineer DM&N Legal Desc. Twp 49 Range 14 Sec 5 QQ NESE Style No Style USGS Quad Duluth Heights Construction Date 1917-1918 UTM Zone 15N Datum NAD83 Easting 565753 Northing 5177951 Original Use Transportation Property ID (PIN) Current Use Transportation Description The Oliver Bridge, known as Bridge 6544 in Minnesota and as Bridge B-16-755 in Wisconsin, spans the St. Louis River between the Gary-New Duluth neighborhood of Duluth, St. Louis County, Minnesota and the Village of Oliver, Douglas County, Wisconsin. The double-deck steel bridge is of riveted steel construction using built-up members. It is comprised of a balanced center swing span and steel approach viaducts on each side. It has an overall structure length of 1,889.75 feet (ft.) and an overall width of 25 ft. (DM&IR 1999, MnDOT 2013). Aligned on an east-west orientation, the structure carries railroad tracks on the upper deck and a two-lane vehicular roadway on the lower deck. The railroad carried by the bridge is the Canadian National Railway (CN) (see history section for names of predecessor lines). From the west, the railroad tracks approach the bridge following a gentle curve from a northwest to east alignment, then following a straight west-to-east alignment across the bridge and into Wisconsin. The bridge carries Minnesota State Highway (SH) 39 on the Minnesota side, becoming Wisconsin Highway (WH) 105 at the state line, located at the midpoint of the river. From the west, SH 39 parallels the CN right-of-way (ROW) on the south side of the tracks. As the two-lane highway approaches the bridge, it follows an “S- curve” alignment and approaches the lower deck, ducking under the span of the upper deck to access the lower deck. In Wisconsin, WH 105 parallels the railroad tracks about a half block to the north. As the road approaches the bridge, it follows an “S-curve” alignment, ducking under the end span of the upper deck, to access the lower deck. As a result, the lower deck of the viaduct has one less span at each end compared to the upper deck The substructure of the Oliver Bridge includes abutments, piers, and steel bents. At the ends of the bridge, there are reinforced- concrete abutments with wingwalls, one for each deck. Fill and sheet pile are behind the wingwalls on the Minnesota side. At the interior ends of the first and last spans of the upper deck, there are rectangular, reinforced-concrete piers, which is where the approaches to the lower deck transition to the steel viaducts. The swing span rests on a center-bearing pivot mechanism anchored atop a circular, reinforced-concrete center pier (Pier 2). At each end of the swing span, there are rectangular, reinforced-concrete piers (Piers 1 and 3) with breakwaters that carry the ends of the approaches. The western pier (Pier 1) is surrounded by sheet pile. The bridge no longer operates as a swing span; the last time the bridge functioned in this capacity was in 1947. The substructure of approach viaducts are comprised of four-legged, rigid frame steel bents resting on steel base plates set atop concrete footings. The bents are set perpendicular to the span and are two panels tall, with the lower bridge deck passing through the upper panel of each bent. The bents consist of latticed legs that support plate girder bent caps under each deck, with latticed strut and angle iron sway bracing that is attached to the legs of the bents by gusset plates. The approaches to the lower deck of the bridge, between the abutments and the steel viaducts, were replaced in 2001. These spans now rest on steel bents SL-DUL-3143 MINNESOTA ARCHITECTURE - HISTORY INVENTORY FORM Project: Local Historic Bridge Study - Phase II Duluth, St. Louis County, Minnesota with concrete pier caps. The superstructure of the Oliver Bridge consists of a balanced center, swinging, Warren through/deck-truss main span with steel deck plate girder and steel stringer approach viaducts on each side. The main span is located over the main channel of the St. Louis River and rests on a center-bearing pivot mechanism anchored atop the center pier. The rigid connected Warren truss is 306 ft. in length and, when rotated, accommodates two 125 ft. wide channels. The built-up truss is comprised of 12-panels, six on each side of the pivot pier. Each panel is comprised of latticed steel diagonals and verticals. In addition, there are vertical end posts at each end of the swing span. The Warren truss serves as a deck truss for the railroad line and as a through truss for the roadway. Under the truss, there are angled brackets to help transfer the weight of the span to the center bearing. At the center bearing there are four steel trucks at 90-degree intervals, each with two rollers that balance the span and carry part of its weight. The trucks are affixed to the span and rotate with it, following a steel track mounted atop the pier. Just outside the trucks is a cast steel bull gear. The gear mechanisms, which engage the bull gear, are mounted within the struts under the span. The approach viaducts are comprised of 31 upper deck spans, 27 on the Minnesota side of the swing span and four on the Wisconsin side. The upper deck extends the entire length of the approaches and the lower deck is one span shorter on each end. There is one less span at each end of the lower deck as this is where the highway approaches duck under the end spans of the upper deck to access the lower deck of the bridge. Individual spans range from 25 to 90 ft. in length, typically, with 30 ft. spans over the four-legged bents and 70 ft. spans between the bents. Within each span there is sway bracing between the girders. The superstructure consists of steel beams that carry the lower deck and two parallel deck girder spans. There is sway bracing between these paired spans. Originally, the upper deck carries to sets of tracks (double track mainline). Each of the two parallel spans of the upper deck carried a single track. However, one set of tracks have been removed. The set of track on the northern side of the structure remain in place and are active; while the set of tracks on the southern side of the structure have been removed. The remaining set of tracks consists of steel rails laid on bridge ties resting on the girders. The upper deck includes a metal railing on each side of the deck. The current lower deck, which carries the vehicular roadway, dates to 2001. It is cast-in-place concrete with a Type “F” railing, and sits atop steel stringers. This deck has a width of 22.8 feet and a vertical clearance of 14.1 ft (MnDOT 2012; MnDOT 2013). A bridge plate is located on the north side of the bridge; at the first Wisconsin approach span, and reads “BR 6544 1910, 2001.” EVALUATION AND ANALYSIS Historical Context Railroads in Minnesota, 1862-1956 Minnesota's Iron Ore Industry, 1880s-1945 Mining Development on the Iron Range, 1892-1954 Historical Narrative Significance The DM&N / DM&IR Ore Dock 6 Approach is a part of the DM&N / DM&IR Mountain Iron to Mesabi Junction (Duluth) railroad corridor and was constructed as part of Ore Dock 6. The DM&N / DM&IR Mountain Iron to Mesabi Junction (Duluth) railroad corridor was previously determined eligible for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) under Criterion A, in the area of history, for its association with the historic mining transportation system in Duluth (MnDOT Cultural Resources Unit Correspondence with Mead & Hunt, 5 April, 2004). The DM&N / DM&IR Ore Dock 6 Approach has significance as a contributing resource to the DM&N / DM&IR Mountain Iron to Mesabi Junction (Duluth) line. This railroad line has local and statewide significance under NRHP Criterion A within SL-DUL-3143 MINNESOTA ARCHITECTURE - HISTORY INVENTORY FORM Project: Local Historic Bridge Study - Phase II Duluth, St. Louis County, Minnesota the historical context that was established in the “Railroads in Minnesota, 1862-1956 Multiple Property Documentation Form (MPDF)” (Schmidt et al. 2007:F-194-196). Within the “Railroads in Minnesota, 1862-1956 MPDF” the railroad corridor meets Registration Requirement 2, as a railroad corridor historic district, because it provided transportation between a significant class of resources (iron ore) and an important transfer point for this product (ore docks on Lake Superior at Duluth). Moreover, as the first railroad line to reach the Mesabi Range, it established an important railroad connection that did not previously exist, thereby enabling the profitability, and corresponding significant expansion of iron mining on the Range. Upon its completion, the DM&N provided mine owners with a means to cost effectively ship ore to Lake Superior, where it could be transferred to ships destined for steel mills hundreds of miles away. Until the DM&N reached the Mesabi Range, its ore deposits were of little value due their distance from mills.
Recommended publications
  • United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit ______No

    United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit ______No

    In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19-3129 WISCONSIN CENTRAL LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. No. 1:16-cv-04271 — Andrea R. Wood, Judge. ____________________ ARGUED SEPTEMBER 25, 2020 — DECIDED MARCH 31, 2021 ____________________ Before RIPPLE, BRENNAN, and ST. EVE, Circuit Judges. BRENNAN, Circuit Judge. Decades ago, railroad company Wisconsin Central, Ltd. entered into an agreement that included the purchase of rail lines from Soo Line Railroad Company. Part of that agreement allocated responsibility for future environmental liabilities. Years later, contamination was discovered near one of those lines in Ashland, Wisconsin on the shore of Lake Superior. 2 No. 19-3129 The railroads jointly defended and settled responsibility for the investigation and remediation of that site. Then they each sought indemnification from the other. The district court awarded summary judgment to Soo Line for damages, attor- neys’ fees, and costs. On appeal, the railroads dispute when a claim was first asserted, and how much of the cost of defending and settling the matter was related to the rail lines and their operation. In- demnification under the agreement turns on both issues. I. In a 1987 Asset Purchase Agreement (“Agreement”) Wis- consin Central purchased various assets of Soo Line’s Lake States Transportation division, including physical rail lines in Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Michigan (“LST”).1 The Agree- ment provided for a detailed allocation of liability and indem- nification of each party by the other.
  • A Steel-Hulled Bulk Freighter Measuring 610.9 in Length, with a Beam of 60.0 Feet, and a Depth of Hold of 32.6 Feet

    A Steel-Hulled Bulk Freighter Measuring 610.9 in Length, with a Beam of 60.0 Feet, and a Depth of Hold of 32.6 Feet

    NFS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. 8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL National Register of Historic Places REGISTER Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual properties or districts. See instructions in Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, styles, materials, and areas of significance, enter only the categories and subcategories listed in the instructions. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900a). Type all entries. 1. Name of Property_________________________________________________ historic name Freighter WILLIAM A. IRVIN other names/site number N/A 2. Location street & number Minnesota Slip. Duluth Harbor I_| not for publication N/A city, town Duluth I I vicinity N/A state Minnesota code MN county St . Louis code 137 zip code 55802 3. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property I I private I I building(s) Contributing Noncontributing I~x1 public-local I I district ____buildings I I public-State I I site ____ sites I I public-Federal Pn structure ____ structures I I object ____ objects ____Total Name of related multiple property listing: Number of contributing resources previously listed in the National Register _Q______ 4. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this S nomination EH request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
  • Strike on the Mesabi, 1907

    Strike on the Mesabi, 1907

    STRIKE on the MESABI—1907 NEIL BETTEN WHEN NEWS CAME in July, 1907, that miners along the length of the Mesabi Range had walked off the job, the state of Minnesota braced itself for all-out labor war. It was the first widespread, organized strike to occur in the iron district, and it was en­ gineered by the Western Federation of Miners, an or­ ganization associated in the public mind with names like Coeur d'Alene, Leadville, and Cripple Creek — each the scene of fierce and bloody labor struggles. In the fifteen years since 1892 the Mesabi Range had been transformed from a wilderness of wooded hills into a mining complex that produced nearly half of the nation's iron ore. The soft red hematite lying in pockets near the surface could be scooped up from A typical iron range great open pits. Into these, and into underground mine worker of the mines as well, had poured whole armies of unskilled early twentieth century workers. Youth, health, and a strong back were all that was called for — not even the language was necessary — and before long the first wave of miners, made up of Mr. Betten wrote the present article while working for his doctorate in history at the University of Minnesota. He re­ cently joined the facidty of the University of Indiana at Gary. 340 MINNESOTA History Americans, Cornishmen, French Canadians, AFL. The preamble to the WFM constitu­ Irish, Scandinavians, and some Finns, was tion declared that "the class struggle will replaced by a throng of more recent immi­ continue until the producer is recognized as grants.
  • Ashland, Wisconsin a Coastal Community Smart Growth Case Study Author: Rebecca Pearson Editor: Victoria Pebbles, Great Lakes Commission

    Ashland, Wisconsin a Coastal Community Smart Growth Case Study Author: Rebecca Pearson Editor: Victoria Pebbles, Great Lakes Commission

    Ashland, Wisconsin A Coastal Community Smart Growth Case Study Author: Rebecca Pearson Editor: Victoria Pebbles, Great Lakes Commission Ashland is a close. The busy small port and the community in shipping industry northeastern that served it went Wisconsin, from moving located on millions of tons of Chequamegon iron ore, Bay on the brownstone and southwest shore lumber to an of Lake occasional Superior. shipment of coal. Endowed with By 2009, the an abundance of Canadian National natural Railway which resources (timber, water, iron ore and acquired Wisconsin Central was the only railroad brownstone) and access to the Great Lakes, the service in Ashland. city of Ashland flourished as a port in the 1800s where raw and processed natural materials where As industries declined, so did the population. shipped to urban areas elsewhere in the Great Ashland lost population at a rate of about 5 Lakes region. At that time, Ashland’s waterfront percent every decade from the early 1900s until was developed to serve the industries that the 1990s. From 1990 to 2000, Ashland’s supported the processing and transport of natural population began to stabilize with only a 0.8 resources, such as sawmills, lumberyards and iron percent decline. According to the 2000 U.S. docks. Supporting commercial development grew Census, Ashland’s population is just over 8,600. up south of the waterfront, while residential development occurred still south of the Like many post-war cities and towns across the commercial area. Great Lakes region and elsewhere in the U.S, while the city itself contracted, the surrounding Railroads also played an important role in towns and rural areas of Ashland County, Ashland’s growth from the late 1800s into the experienced a 3.4 percent population increase early 1900s.
  • Isotopic and Chemical Characterization of Water from Mine Pits and Wells on the Mesabi Iron Range, Northeastern Minnesota, As a Tool for Drinking Water Protection

    Isotopic and Chemical Characterization of Water from Mine Pits and Wells on the Mesabi Iron Range, Northeastern Minnesota, As a Tool for Drinking Water Protection

    Isotopic and Chemical Characterization of Water From Mine Pits and Wells on the Mesabi Iron Range, Northeastern Minnesota, as a Tool for Drinking Water Protection James F. Walsh, Minnesota Department of Health Abstract The Biwabik Iron Formation is both a world-class source of iron ore and an important aquifer for the residents of the Mesabi Iron Range in northeastern Minnesota. Numerous public water supply wells draw from this aquifer, and several communities pump directly from abandoned mine pits for their water supply. It is important that the groundwater flow characteristics of this aquifer be determined so that drinking water supplies can be protected in a technically defensible manner. The iron formation is early Proterozoic in age and consists primarily of fine-grained silica and iron minerals that were deposited as chemical sediments in a marine environment. The unit has little primary porosity. Groundwater flow through the aquifer is controlled predominantly by secondary features such as folds, high- angle faults, joints, and man-made mining structures. Efforts at delineating source water protection areas on the Mesabi Range have been complicated by the extremely heterogeneous and anisotropic nature of porosity in the Biwabik Iron Formation aquifer. In the absence of reliable groundwater flow models for this type of setting, isotopic and chemical studies have been emphasized, in addition to hydrogeologic mapping. Conservative environmental tracers such as chloride and the stable isotopes of oxygen and hydrogen have proved useful for 1) identifying wells that are receiving recharge from mine pits, 2) characterizing the tracer signature of those mine pits that may represent recharge areas for nearby public supply wells, and 3) quantifying the significance of these recharge areas for the purpose of targeting source water protection efforts.
  • Mining on the Mesabi Iron Range?

    Mining on the Mesabi Iron Range?

    What’s Happening in Mining on the Mesabi Iron Range? Dan Jordan Mining & Minerals Program Supervisor Iron Range Resources Projects that must go through Environmental Review lvpmn.org 23 Project locations 13 Developers $6 billion dollars = Approximate total value of all projects Large Scale Developments 2005 - 2011 The Iron Range has a history of large scale projects that can transform the landscape. But, not since the 1960’s and early 1970’s has the region seen so many large scale projects under consideration all at the same time • Excelsior Energy Project $2,000,000,000 • Minnesota Steel Industries project in Nashwauk $1,650,000,000 • Machine #7 at the UPM paper mill in Grand Rapids $650,000,000 • Franconia Minerals – Birch Lake & Maturi Extension $616,000,000 • PolyMet’s NorthMet Project $380,000,000 • Keetac Plant Expansion $300,000,000 • Mesabi Nugget Production Scale Plant in Hoyt Lakes $235,000,000 • Taconite Plant Capacity Expansion $275,000,000 & Alternate Energy Improvements • MP Allete Clay Boswell Unit 3 Retrofit $200,000,000 • Laurentian Energy Project for Hibbing and Virginia $80,000,000 Total $6,386,000,000 Currently 6 Taconite Mines are in operation in Minnesota 2004 Foreign ownership: Stelco 14.7% of HibTac Today: Global ownership & competition United States Steel 2007 Name Production Employees Ownership Million Tons Minntac 12.751 1210 US Steel Corp. Keewatin Taconite 5.220 385 US Steel Corp. Managed by Cleveland Cliffs Mining Co. 2007 Name Production Emp. Ownership Million Tons ArcelorMittal 62.3% Hibbing 7.266 689 U S Steel Corp. 14.7% Taconite Cleveland-Cliffs 25% Northshore 4.975 511 Cleveland-Cliffs 100% Mining United Cleveland-Cliffs 70% 5.279 431 Taconite Laiwu Steel Group 30% 2007 Name Production Emp Ownership Million Tons ArcelorMittal 2.708 533 ArcelorMittal 100% Minorca Mine Inc.
  • Minnesota Statewide Historic Railroads Study Final MPDF

    Minnesota Statewide Historic Railroads Study Final MPDF

    St. Michael Big Marine ! ! Anoka Lake ! Berning Mill !Rogers Champlin ! Anoka HennepinMis siss Fletcher ip Maple Island ! pi ! R Lino Lakes ! i Centerville v ! er ! on Hanover ! Hugo ti Wright ! Coon Creek Maple Grove ! Hennepin arnelian Junc rcola Anoka Withrow C ! A Burschville ! ! ! !Osseo Ramsey te Bear Beach Whi ! Bald Eagle ! !Dupont !Corcoran !Brooklyn Park on ! ! Dellwood Rockford ! Fridley White di ! White me ! C Bear luth Juncti Lake Sarah ardigan Bear ahto ! Du ! Lake !M Lake !Leighton New Junction Vadnais Heights ! Stillwater ! Columbia Brighton ! ! Lor ! ! ood Heights etto rchw ! ! Bi Hamel ! ! ! Little Canada Medi Robbinsdale North c Bayport ine La ! ! Ditter ! St. Paul S Lon ! t Roseville . ! C gL r Maple Plain k Golden Gloster o e ! a i k ! Valley ! x e ! ! Lake Elmo R i Lyndale ! ! v ! Oakdale e ! r ! Midvale Ramsey ! Wayzata Washington Minneapolis Spring P Minnet ! onka Saint Paul St. D ! ! M . Oakbury Lakeland ! ark Lake ills ! Mound ! ! Louis D ! Minnetonka ! D . ! Park ! . ! . ! ! D . Deephaven ! ! ! West Highwood . ! Hopkins ! D St. Paul ! Glen Lake . ! ! ! Afton D ! St. Bonifacius M ! Excelsior . .! is Oak Terrace! South s ! i s s D ! St. Paul .! ! Fort . i ! Mendota . p Carver p Snelling . ! i D . ! Waconia R iver Newport ! D Chanhassen .! D ! ! Atwood D !Victoria Inver Grove ! ! D Eden Prairie .! St. Paul Cottage Grove ! !D Park .! Oxboro ! Bl oo D Hennep Bloomington .! mington Ferry ! ! Nicols Wescott ! D . ! in ! er . ! iv ! Augusta ta R ! Langdon ! so D nne . ! i ! ! M D Map adapted from the MN DNR divison of Fish and Wildlife 100k Lakes and Rivers and 100k Hydrography, Railroad Commissioners Map of Minnesota, 1930, and MN DOT Abandonded Railroads GIS data.
  • The People of the Mesabi Range John Sirjamal{I

    The People of the Mesabi Range John Sirjamal{I

    The People of the Mesabi Range John Sirjamal{i THE MESABI RANGE was a great expanse of forests and swamps in northeastern Minnesota when, in 1890, iron ore was discovered near what is now the thriving village of Mountain Iron. This first find of ore led, with later surveying, to the uncovering of vast ore beds along the southern slope of a range of low-lying hills which stretch in a flattened S-curve some eighty miles in length and two to ten miles in width in a general northeast-southwest direction. In 1890 the area of the Mesabi, some seventy miles northwest of Duluth, was enveloped in wilderness. The Duluth and Iron Range Railway, which ran between Two Harbors and the Vermilion Range, skirted the range at the village of Mesaba, far to the east of the newly dis­ covered deposits. At the west end of the range, lumbermen steadily pushed their operations up the Mississippi and Swan rivers after 1870, but by 1890 they had not yet reached the section in which the ores were first discovered. Unsettled and isolated until the discovery of ore, the Mesabi Range came to quick life after 1890. The digging of iron ore began in a high pitch of mining fever; companies were organized to mine the ore deposits, men moved into the area to seek new jobs and possibly acquire wealth, and mining camps and villages were laid out to care for the influx of population. In 1892 the first shipment of ore was made from the Mountain Iron mine; in the next year nine mines made shipments; and there were eleven in 1894, with a total tonnage of one and three-quarter millions.^ By 1895 the Mesabi had attained its present reputation as the most productive of all the Lake Superior ranges.
  • 933-2966 Hulett I Sheet 5/5/09 1:41 PM Page 1

    933-2966 Hulett I Sheet 5/5/09 1:41 PM Page 1

    933-2966 Hulett I sheet 5/5/09 1:41 PM Page 1 HO Scale Structure Kit 933-2966 HULETT UNLOADER Thanks for purchasing this Cornerstone Series® Missabe Range in the early 1890s. Vessels again Realizing that something had to be done the kit. All parts are styrene, so use compatible glue grew, reaching 475' (144.7m) by 1897. Once industry developed new methods to process and paint with your model. Please read these again, the stage was set for a new generation of taconite, introducing the first pellets in 1955. instructions and study the drawings before unloading machinery. starting. Huletts had no trouble handling the new marble- A radical new unloader appeared in 1899, the sized pellets — but neither did boats equipped While iron ore was discovered in Michigan’s brainchild of engineer George Hulett, on the with self-unloading machinery. First used on the upper peninsula in 1844, it took decades to docks of the Carnegie Steel Company in lakes in 1902, belt unloaders had proven well develop efficient ways to deliver it to eastern Conneaut, Ohio. Steam powered and rated at suited to coal and limestone, and allowed vessels furnaces by rail and water. In 1852, the first 275 tons per hour, the unit was constructed as an to unload quickly at virtually any desired large shipment, roughly 2 tons (1.8 MT), arrived experiment, but proved so successful that location. Natural ore had proved troublesome in Cleveland in barrels! But when the Sault St. additional examples were soon in use, and in with these units, and the general feeling was that Marie canal opened three years later, the stage 1904, the 540' (164.5m) long Augustus P.
  • Michigan's Railroad History

    Michigan's Railroad History

    Contributing Organizations The Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) wishes to thank the many railroad historical organizations and individuals who contributed to the development of this document, which will update continually. Ann Arbor Railroad Technical and Historical Association Blue Water Michigan Chapter-National Railway Historical Society Detroit People Mover Detroit Public Library Grand Trunk Western Historical Society HistoricDetroit.org Huron Valley Railroad Historical Society Lansing Model Railroad Club Michigan Roundtable, The Lexington Group in Transportation History Michigan Association of Railroad Passengers Michigan Railroads Association Peaker Services, Inc. - Brighton, Michigan Michigan Railroad History Museum - Durand, Michigan The Michigan Railroad Club The Michigan State Trust for Railroad Preservation The Southern Michigan Railroad Society S O October 13, 2014 Dear Michigan Residents: For more than 180 years, Michigan’s railroads have played a major role in the economic development of the state. This document highlights many important events that have occurred in the evolution of railroad transportation in Michigan. This document was originally published to help celebrate Michigan’s 150th birthday in 1987. A number of organizations and individuals contributed to its development at that time. The document has continued to be used by many since that time, so a decision was made to bring it up to date and keep the information current. Consequently, some 28 years later, the Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) has updated the original document and is placing it on our website for all to access. As you journey through this history of railroading in Michigan, may you find the experience both entertaining and beneficial. MDOT is certainly proud of Michigan’s railroad heritage.
  • Chocolay Township History Then And

    Chocolay Township History Then And

    n ... I ' J r ' l r ' r ) J l I : J J; J' ' J. On the cover: this photograph was taken on top of the "Rock Cut" on March 6, 2008 at 11 :00 a.m. by Tom Shaw. In response to why this place, Tom answered: "Exercise, fresh air, beauty, quiet time with Him, to step back and look at the big picture and because I can. The best short answer is that I love it. The view brings me back to simpler times." CHOCOLAY TOWNSHIP . .. Just the combination of those two words CHOCOLAY TOWNSHIP brings some vision to your mind. It may be the one on the cover of this booklet or any of the various scenes throughout the other pages. All of them are special to someone, but whatever picture comes to your mind and the fact that you are reading this booklet reinforces that this is a special place for you. As you read this historical writing, I just want to join you in thanking the dozens of people who made it possible. First the township board located a woman, Elizabeth Delene who had the gift for writing and arranging the many contributions that came her way. Elizabeth, thank you for making the time to put these facts in a very readable form! Next on the list of volunteers is Cathy Phelps from the township office. She went above and beyond the call of duty to solicit information and assist Elizabeth in putting together this manuscript. A local committee of Lula Sarka, Elry Reetz, Marilyn Heitman, and Ben Mukkala were ever ready to assist joined together to read the facts, and add comments and reach out for additional information to make this a factual, fascinating piece.
  • 2004 Lake Superior Term4.0.Qxd

    2004 Lake Superior Term4.0.Qxd

    2004 Minnesota's Lake Superior Terminals PORT AND WATERWAYS SECTION MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Foreward The Ports and Waterways Section of the Minnesota Department of Transportation has prepared this terminal directory to pro- vide information about Minnesota’s Lake Superior terminals. This directory includes information on the 33 terminals in Duluth–Superior, Two Harbors, Silver Bay, and Taconite Harbor. Information on Superior, Wisconsin terminals is included because Duluth and Superior share one Harbor. Terminals are arranged in the directory by location in each harbor, beginning with those in Duluth proceeding to Superior and then moving north along Minnesota’s North Shore to Two Harbors, Silver Bay, and Taconite Harbor. The index presents an geographical list- ing of the terminals. Information for each terminal includes cargo handled, pier length, depth along dock, storage, equipment, rail–truck access, and the name of a contact person. Information included in this directory was obtained from terminal operators and the Seaway Port Authority of Duluth. The pho- tographs of the terminals in Two Harbors, Silver Bay, and Taconite Harbor were obtained from the Canal Park Marine Museum in Duluth. The photograph of the Murphy Oil Main Terminal was obtained from Grandmaison Studios of Duluth. The cover picture of the M/V Roger Blough was courtesy of Kenneth R. Newhams, Duluth Shipping News. For other boat pic- tures, contact Mr Newhams at 218-722-3119 or E-mail: [email protected]. To Order Minnesota’s Lake Superoir Terminals booklet Dick Lambert Ports and Waterways Section Phone: 651–406-4805 Fax: 651–406-4811 Email: [email protected] Acknowledgements Kim Lanahan–Lahti Layout Design Spring 2004 Duluth / Superior Harbor Lake Superior 1 31 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 11 30 9 12 29 13 27 28 10 26 14 DULUTH TERMINALS 25 24 Lafarge North America Inc.