DOCSLIB.ORG

Making Sense of All the Post Emergent Herbicide Options in Turf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Making Sense of All the Post Emergent Herbicide Options in Turf Brian McDonald OSU Horticulture Dec 17, 2013 Turf Herbicides are Like Cereals – more choices than you need. PBI Gordon Has 8 “Trimec’s”! 1. Super Trimec 2. Trimec 1000 3. Trimec 992 4. Trimec – Bentgrass Formula 5. Trimec Classic 6. Trimec LAF – 637 7. Trimec Plus 8. Trimec Southern NuFarm Has Even More Choices! 1. 4-Speed (Pyraflufen + 2,4-D, MCPP, Dicamba) 2. 4-Speed XT (Pyraflufen + 2,4-D, Triclopyr, Dicamba) 3. Cool Power (Ester Triclopyr, MCPA, Dicamba) 4. Escalade 2 (2,4-D, Fluroxypyr, & Dicamba) 5. Horsepower (MCPA, Triclopyr, and Dicamba) 6. Quincept (2,4-D, Drive, & Dicamba) 7. (3) different “Triplet”s (Low odor, Sensitive & SF) 8. Change Up (MCPA, fluroxypyr, dicamba) 9. Elliptical (2,4-D, Fluroxypyr, & Dicamba) 10. Millennium Ultra 2 (2,4-D, Clopyralid, & Dicamba) How do we make sense out of all of these? Overview 1. Making sense of all the Choices a. Review the “standard” 3 – way mixes b. Look at “newer kids” on the block c. Review “alternative” herbicide mixes 2. Review the common weeds and match the herbicides to the weeds. 3. Maximizing weed kill – other factors. 4. Go through a few scenarios. Common Broadleaf Chemicals Chemical Common formulations 2,4-D Amine salt Ester 2,4-DP Amine salt Ester MCPA Amine salt Ester MCPP Amine salt Dicamba Amine salt Triclopyr Amine salt Ester Clopyralid Amine salt Quinclorac Amine salt “New Kids on the Block” Chemical Common formulations Fluroxypyr (Spotlight/Escalade 2) Ester Carfentrazone (Quicksilver/SpeedZone/ PowerZone) Sulfentrazone (in Q4) Pyraflufen (in 4-Speed + 2,4-D, MCPP, Dicamba) Pyraflufen (in 4-Speed XT + 2,4-D, Triclopyr, Dicamba) Penoxulam (Sapphire) Florasulam (Defendor) Tenacity (Mesotrione) – Post/Pre emergent My Classifications 1. “Standard” 3-way Mixes 2. Non 2,4-D 3-way Mixes 3. Safety 3–Way Mixes 4. Specialty 3-Way Mixes “Standard” Mixtures 2,4-D + MCPP + Dicamba Amine formulations: Trimec Classic Mec Amine-D Triplet Low Odor Standard 3-Way Mixes They are all the same thing! lbs of ae per acre at 4 pts/Acre Herbicide Signal Word 2,4-D MCPP Dicamba Mec Amine-D Danger 1.22 0.33 0.11 Trimec 1000 Warning 1.19 0.33 0.11 Trimec 992 Danger 1.19 0.32 0.11 Triplet - Low Odor Danger 1.19 0.32 0.11 Triplet - SelecEve Danger 1.19 0.32 0.11 Triplet SF Danger 1.19 0.32 0.11 Lesco Three-Way Danger 1.19 0.32 0.11 Trimec Classic Danger 0.99 0.27 0.11 Standard 3-Way Mixes “Non 2,4-D Mixes” lbs of ae per acre at 4 pts/ High Rate Acre Signal Word Form. Pts./Acre gal/acre MCPA MCPP Dicamba Trimec Encore Danger DMA Salt 4.00 0.50 1.49 0.32 0.15 Tri-Power Danger DMA Salt 4.10 0.51 1.59 0.31 0.15 If you are banned from using 2,4-D, substitute MCPA. Your weed control will be the same. Standard 3-Way Mixes “Safety Mixes” Low rate of dicamba for tree safety Signal Rate lbs of ae per acre at 4 pts/Acre Herbicide Word Pints/Acre 2,4-D MCPP Dicamba Trimec LAF 637 Danger 3.7 1.52 0.25 0.06 Low rate of 2,4-D for sensitive grass safety (e.g. bentgrass) Trimec - Bentgrass Warning 6 0.53 0.33 0.14 Triplet - SensiEve Danger 4 0.41 0.72 0.18 Standard 3-Way Mixes “Specialty Mix” These both add 2,4-DP, a sister compound of 2,4-D which has no effect on weed control. Doubles the rate of dicamba for vs. standard 3 – way mix, but no MCPP. * Ester High Rate lbs of ae per acre Signal Word Pts./Acre gal/acre 2,4-D 2,4-DP MCPP Dicamba Super Trimec* Warning 3.0 0.4 0.7* 0.4* 0.0 0.2 Getting rid of the MCPP and using an ester formulation lowers the signal word because esters don’t cause irreversible eye damage Triamine Danger 4.0 0.5 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.0 2,4-D (or 2,4-DP) + MCPP + Dicamba MCPA + MCPP + Dicamba Amine formulations Good Control: Common Dandelion, False Dandelion, Plantain, Mousear Chickweed Fair Control: Black Medic & Clover Poor Control: Oxalis, English Daisy, Yarrow, Veronica Common Dandelion Good Control with standard 3-Way mixes Common Dandelion Generally easy to control – Rarely requires repeat applications – Fall applications are highly effective • Products: – Mixtures, 2,4-D, (Drive is weak) False Dandelion Good Control with standard 3-Way mixes False Dandelion Surprisingly hard to control – Fall applications are more effective – Repeat treatments necessary – Spring treated weeds tend to recover • Products: – Mixtures with 2,4-D, 2,4-D + Drive. Broadleaf Plantain Good Control with standard 3-Way mixes Broadleaf Plantain Generally easy to control – May require repeat applications – Fall applications are highly effective • Products: – Mixtures, 2,4-D, Drive Mousear Chickweed Good Control with standard 3-Way mixes Mousear Chickweed • Fairly easy to control – May need repeat applications – Timing is flexible • Products: – Most mixtures, MCPP, Dicamba Spotted Spurge Summer annual: Germinates @ 50 ° F Grows thru summer and seeds Dies from frost in fall Good Control with standard 3-Way mixes Spotted Spurge • Post emergence: – All mixtures – Early in season is best – May require repeat applications What about? • Clovers • English Daisy • Veronica • Oxalis (Woodsorrel) • Common Yarrow • And others…… Strategies for improving mixture performance 1. Change components 2. Add components 3. Change formulations Modified 3-way Mixtures Escalade 2 Super Trimec 2,4-D* 2,4-D** Fluroxypyr** Dichlorprop** Dicamba Dicamba Chaser Ultra 2 Cool Power MCPA** MCPA** * Amines Fluroxypyr** Triclopyr** ** Esters Dichlorprop* Dicamba Add/Change Components Speedzone Powerzone 2,4-D** MCPA** MCPP*** MCPP*** Dicamba*** Dicamba*** * Amine Carfentrazone Carfentrazone ** Ester *** Acid Q 4 Plus Surge 2,4-D* 2,4-D* Quinclorac MCPP* Dicamba* Dicamba* Sulfentrazone Sulfentrazone New Components Carfentrazone & Sulfentrazone: Family: aryl triazolinone Impact: Faster weed response in cool weather Increased spectrum of weed control Pyraflufen is also in this class White Clover Fair Control – repeat applications needed Clovers Easy to injure, hard to kill – Fall applications are more effective – Repeat treatments necessary – Spring treated weeds tend to recover • Products: – Mixtures with Drive, Triclopyr, Clopyralid, or Fluroxypyr English Daisy Poor Control English Daisy Hard to kill – Fall applications are more effective – Repeat treatments improve kill – Spring treatments tend to recover • Products: – Mixtures with Drive, and SpeedZone + Drive + Dicamba, Penoxulam. OSU 2004 English Daisy Control Trial* Rate Control Treatments pts/acre Apps. 10 wks. Speedzone 5 2 100 + Drive 1 lb/acre + Dicamba 0.7 Drive 75 DF + MSO 1 lb/acre 2 99.9 Mec amine D 4 2 99.3 Surge 4 1 85 Speedzone 4 1 78.5 Untreated 0 0 0 *Trial conducted by Brian McDonald Untreated Drive Speedzone Mecamine D 4 weeks after trt. Speedzone + Drive + Dicamba: 4 wks New Herbicides Fluroxypyr • Alone: No longer available. • Mixtures: Escalade 2 Chaser 2 ultra OSU 2005 Broadleaf Weed Control Trial* Single spray weed control at 4 weeks after treatment False Com W Heal- Treatment D. D. Clover all Spotlight 67.3 77.8 100 56.4 2,4-D amine. 92 96.3 12.9 13.2 Spotlight + 2,4-D am. 98.1 96.8 81.1 84 Spotlight + Triplet 99.8 99.1 89.2 88.7 Escalade Low Odor 95.7 96.3 33.3 46.2 Untreated 0 0 0 0 *Conducted by Brian McDonald OSU 2005 Broadleaf Weed Control Trial* Single spray weed control at 12 weeks after treatment False Com W Heal- Treatment D. D. Clover all Spotlight 94 65.2 100 75.7 2,4-D amine 94.8 94.4 94.1 31.6 Spotlight + 2,4-D am. 98.6 97.9 100 96 Spotlight + Triplet 99.8 96.3 100 100 Escalade Low Odor 99.6 92.3 100 99.8 Untreated 0 0 0 0 *Conducted by Brian McDonald New Herbicides Fluroxypyr • Alone: No longer available. • Mixtures: Escalade 2 Chaser 2 ultra Veronica filiformis OSU 2006 Veronica filiformis trial* 9 weeks after treatment % Treatment pts/acre Apps Control Spotlight + 2,4-D 2 + 1 2 99.4 Spotlight 2.5 2 98.9 Drive 75 DF + MSO 1 lb/acre 2 98.8 Spotlight + 2,4-D 1 + 2 2 97.9 Escalade 2 3 2 94.9 Confront 2 2 56.7 Untreated na 0 32.4 * Conducted by Brian McDonald Wood Sorrel Poor Control with 3-Way Mix – need Triclopyr Woodsorrel, Oxalis corniculata Common yarrow Poor Control with 3-Way Mix – need Triclopyr Black Medic, Medicago Lupulina Black Medic Not difficult to kill - Treat in spring - Treat before or at early flower • Products: – Mixtures with Triclopyr, Drive Clopyralid, or Fluroxypyr. Lawn violets, Viola sp. Lawn Violets • Generally difficult to control – Requires repeat applications – Fall applications are more effective • Products: – Mixtures with Triclopyr are most effective Ground Ivy, Glechoma hederacea Ground Ivy • Timing: – Fall ( Oct 1- Nov 1) • Chemicals: – Strong Triclopyr, 2,4-D, Fluroxypyr, Mixtures – Weak Dicamba, Clopyralid, Quinclorac Quiz Chemicals that do a good job controlling: Clover and Black medic Answer Clover & Black Medic Control Carfentrazone, Drive, fluroxypyr, and clopyralid Quiz Chemicals that do a good job controlling: Veronica Answer Veronica Control Drive, Fluroxypyr Quiz Chemicals that do a good job controlling: English Daisy Answer: English Daisy Drive, Q4 Plus, Speedzone + Drive + Dicamba, Penoxulam. (Control may be variable based on biotype.) Quiz A chemical that does a good job controlling: Oxalis,Yarrow, Lawn violets, & Ground Ivy Answer: Oxalis,Yarrow, Lawn violets, & Ground Ivy Triclopyr 2,4-D (or 2,4-DP) + MCPP + Dicamba MCPA + MCPP + Dicamba Amine formulations Good Control: Common Dandelion, False Dandelion, Plantain, Mousear Chickweed Fair Control: Black Medic & Clover, Poor Control: Oxalis, English Daisy, Yarrow, Veronica Overview 1.
Recommended publications
  • 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid

    2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid

    2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid IUPAC (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid name 2,4-D Other hedonal names trinoxol Identifiers CAS [94-75-7] number SMILES OC(COC1=CC=C(Cl)C=C1Cl)=O ChemSpider 1441 ID Properties Molecular C H Cl O formula 8 6 2 3 Molar mass 221.04 g mol−1 Appearance white to yellow powder Melting point 140.5 °C (413.5 K) Boiling 160 °C (0.4 mm Hg) point Solubility in 900 mg/L (25 °C) water Related compounds Related 2,4,5-T, Dichlorprop compounds Except where noted otherwise, data are given for materials in their standard state (at 25 °C, 100 kPa) 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) is a common systemic herbicide used in the control of broadleaf weeds. It is the most widely used herbicide in the world, and the third most commonly used in North America.[1] 2,4-D is also an important synthetic auxin, often used in laboratories for plant research and as a supplement in plant cell culture media such as MS medium. History 2,4-D was developed during World War II by a British team at Rothamsted Experimental Station, under the leadership of Judah Hirsch Quastel, aiming to increase crop yields for a nation at war.[citation needed] When it was commercially released in 1946, it became the first successful selective herbicide and allowed for greatly enhanced weed control in wheat, maize (corn), rice, and similar cereal grass crop, because it only kills dicots, leaving behind monocots. Mechanism of herbicide action 2,4-D is a synthetic auxin, which is a class of plant growth regulators.
  • USDA, Forest Service Forest Health Protection GSA Contract No

    USDA, Forest Service Forest Health Protection GSA Contract No

    SERA TR 02-43-13-03b Triclopyr - Revised Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessments Final Report Prepared for: USDA, Forest Service Forest Health Protection GSA Contract No. GS-10F-0082F USDA Forest Service BPA: WO-01-3187-0150 USDA Purchase Order No.: 43-1387-2-0245 Task No. 13 Submitted to: Dave Thomas, COTR Forest Health Protection Staff USDA Forest Service Rosslyn Plaza Building C, Room 7129C 1601 North Kent Street Arlington, VA 22209 Submitted by: Patrick R. Durkin Syracuse Environmental Research Associates, Inc. 5100 Highbridge St., 42C Fayetteville, New York 13066-0950 Telephone: (315) 637-9560 Fax: (315) 637-0445 E-Mail: [email protected] Home Page: www.sera-inc.com March 15, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF APPENDICES ...................................................... iv LIST OF WORKSHEETS ...................................................... v LIST OF ATTACHMENTS .................................................... v LIST OF TABLES ............................................................ v LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................... viii ACRONYMS, ABBREVIATIONS, AND SYMBOLS .............................. ix COMMON UNIT CONVERSIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS ......................... xi CONVERSION OF SCIENTIFIC NOTATION .................................... xii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................... xiii 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................ 1-1 2. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION ................................................ 2-1 2.1. OVERVIEW
  • Hell - Another Great Deception

    Hell - Another Great Deception

    Hell - Another Great Deception (Copyright ©1truth1law.com 2015) The existence of a literal place called “hell,” where sinners suffer various forms of torment forever, has been ingrained in the minds of people for centuries and, in most cases, those who hold this belief accept it without much thought or study. Religious authorities have used this doctrine to control and manipulate their adherents by instilling fear and blind obedience in them. After all, who wants to be tormented for eternity? It’s better to listen to your church’s directives than turn your back on that authority and end up in hell as a result. Although it is not always stated in exactly these terms, a religious organization can make implications to this effect and its followers will accept and believe the lie. One of the problems associated with this false teaching is that it pictures Almighty God as an unjust and cruel tyrant who seems to enjoy seeing people suffer. In reality, it is “the god of this present evil age,” who gets satisfaction from the misfortunes of others, Grace to you and peace from God the Father and our Lord Jesus Christ, who gave himself for our sins, that he might deliver us from this present evil age… (Gal. 1:3-4a; NKJV used throughout unless otherwise stated; emphasis added). But even if our gospel is veiled, it is veiled to those who are perishing, whose minds the god of the age (Satan) has blinded … (2Cor. 4:3-4; Ed. notes in parenthesis; emphasis added). Those who see you (Satan) will gaze at you, and consider you, saying: ‘Is this this man (Satan when he is judged) who made the earth tremble (cf.
  • Herbicide Mode of Action Table High Resistance Risk

    Herbicide Mode of Action Table High Resistance Risk

    Herbicide Mode of Action Table High resistance risk Chemical family Active constituent (first registered trade name) GROUP 1 Inhibition of acetyl co-enzyme A carboxylase (ACC’ase inhibitors) clodinafop (Topik®), cyhalofop (Agixa®*, Barnstorm®), diclofop (Cheetah® Gold* Decision®*, Hoegrass®), Aryloxyphenoxy- fenoxaprop (Cheetah®, Gold*, Wildcat®), fluazifop propionates (FOPs) (Fusilade®), haloxyfop (Verdict®), propaquizafop (Shogun®), quizalofop (Targa®) Cyclohexanediones (DIMs) butroxydim (Factor®*), clethodim (Select®), profoxydim (Aura®), sethoxydim (Cheetah® Gold*, Decision®*), tralkoxydim (Achieve®) Phenylpyrazoles (DENs) pinoxaden (Axial®) GROUP 2 Inhibition of acetolactate synthase (ALS inhibitors), acetohydroxyacid synthase (AHAS) Imidazolinones (IMIs) imazamox (Intervix®*, Raptor®), imazapic (Bobcat I-Maxx®*, Flame®, Midas®*, OnDuty®*), imazapyr (Arsenal Xpress®*, Intervix®*, Lightning®*, Midas®* OnDuty®*), imazethapyr (Lightning®*, Spinnaker®) Pyrimidinyl–thio- bispyribac (Nominee®), pyrithiobac (Staple®) benzoates Sulfonylureas (SUs) azimsulfuron (Gulliver®), bensulfuron (Londax®), chlorsulfuron (Glean®), ethoxysulfuron (Hero®), foramsulfuron (Tribute®), halosulfuron (Sempra®), iodosulfuron (Hussar®), mesosulfuron (Atlantis®), metsulfuron (Ally®, Harmony®* M, Stinger®*, Trounce®*, Ultimate Brushweed®* Herbicide), prosulfuron (Casper®*), rimsulfuron (Titus®), sulfometuron (Oust®, Eucmix Pre Plant®*, Trimac Plus®*), sulfosulfuron (Monza®), thifensulfuron (Harmony®* M), triasulfuron (Logran®, Logran® B-Power®*), tribenuron (Express®),
  • Exposure to Herbicides in House Dust and Risk of Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

    Exposure to Herbicides in House Dust and Risk of Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

    Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology (2013) 23, 363–370 & 2013 Nature America, Inc. All rights reserved 1559-0631/13 www.nature.com/jes ORIGINAL ARTICLE Exposure to herbicides in house dust and risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia Catherine Metayer1, Joanne S. Colt2, Patricia A. Buffler1, Helen D. Reed3, Steve Selvin1, Vonda Crouse4 and Mary H. Ward2 We examine the association between exposure to herbicides and childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Dust samples were collected from homes of 269 ALL cases and 333 healthy controls (o8 years of age at diagnosis/reference date and residing in same home since diagnosis/reference date) in California, using a high-volume surface sampler or household vacuum bags. Amounts of agricultural or professional herbicides (alachlor, metolachlor, bromoxynil, bromoxynil octanoate, pebulate, butylate, prometryn, simazine, ethalfluralin, and pendimethalin) and residential herbicides (cyanazine, trifluralin, 2-methyl-4- chlorophenoxyacetic acid (MCPA), mecoprop, 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), chlorthal, and dicamba) were measured. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated by logistic regression. Models included the herbicide of interest, age, sex, race/ethnicity, household income, year and season of dust sampling, neighborhood type, and residence type. The risk of childhood ALL was associated with dust levels of chlorthal; compared to homes with no detections, ORs for the first, second, and third tertiles were 1.49 (95% CI: 0.82–2.72), 1.49 (95% CI: 0.83–2.67), and 1.57 (95% CI: 0.90–2.73), respectively (P-value for linear trend ¼ 0.05). The magnitude of this association appeared to be higher in the presence of alachlor.
  • Triclopyr Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessment Corrected Final Report

    Triclopyr Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessment Corrected Final Report

    SERA TR-052-25-03c Triclopyr Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessment Corrected Final Report Submitted to: Paul Mistretta, COR USDA/Forest Service, Southern Region 1720 Peachtree RD, NW Atlanta, Georgia 30309 USDA Forest Service Contract: AG-3187-C-06-0010 USDA Forest Order Number: AG-43ZP-D-09-0034 SERA Internal Task No. 52-25 Submitted by: Patrick R. Durkin Syracuse Environmental Research Associates, Inc. 8125 Solomon Seal Manlius, New York 13104 Fax: (315) 637-0445 E-Mail: [email protected] Home Page: www.sera-inc.com May 24, 2011 October 20, 2011 (Minor Correction) July 9, 2016 (Corrections) Error Notes October 20, 2011 In the original release of the final report (SERA TR-052-25-03a dated May 24, 2011), Tables 2 and 22 incorrectly listed the water solubility of TCP as 100 mg/L. As indicated in Table 1, the correct value, from Knuteson (1999), is 49,000 mg/L. This error was noted by Dr. K. King (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). The error has been corrected. While the Gleams-Driver runs were made using the 100 mg/L water solubility, re-runs using the water solubility of 49,000 mg/L yielded results that are indistinguishable from the original runs. Thus, the appendices have not been change. Water solubility is not a sensitive parameter in GLEAMS unless the soil water is saturated. This did not occur in the Gleams-Driver modeling. July 9, 2016 During an audit of WorksheetMaker (Version 6.00.15), it was noted that the chronic toxicity values of TCP to aquatic invertebrates had been entered incorrectly into the WorksheetMaker database and the aquatic toxicity values of TCP for algae had been omitted.
  • MC(' Potential Exposure of Humans to 2

    MC(' Potential Exposure of Humans to 2

    (MC( FUNDAMENTAL AND APPLIED TOXICOLOGY 1:3 3 9-3 4 6 (1981) Potential Exposure of Humans to 2,4,5-T and TCDD in the Oregon Coast Ranges MICHAEL NEWTON" and LOGAN A. NORRISB "Professor of Forest Ecology, Oregon State University, Corvallis; BChief Research Chemist, USDA Forest Service, Corvallis, Oregon ABSTRACT Potential Exposure of Humans to 2,4,5-T and TCDD in Humans may be exposed to herbicides through drift; inges- the Oregon Coast Ranges. Newton, M. and Norris, L.A. tion of wild and domestic meat, vegetables, and fruit; con- (1981). F.undam. AppL Toxicol. 1:339-346. Research on the sumption of water; and dermal contact while handling the use of 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4,5-T) contami- chemicals, equipment, and treated vegetation. The range of -8 nated with 2.5 X 10 parts 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p- potential exposure extends from zero, if there is no encounter dioxin (TCDD) in forests of the Oregon Coast Ranges per- with the herbicide, to the worst situation where the person has mits estimates of human exposures for both compounds. encountered the highest levels of water contamination, drift Estimated total exposure of nearby ( ^ 1/8 mile distant) resi- exposure, meat contamination, and dermal exposure simul- dents during the first week after application is 0.0039 mg/kg taneously. We have brought estimates of all sources together of 2,4,5-T for a 70-kg adult. Exposure to TCDD in the same to determine the possible range of total exposure from episode would be 1.9 X 10 b ° mg/kg.
  • INDEX to PESTICIDE TYPES and FAMILIES and PART 180 TOLERANCE INFORMATION of PESTICIDE CHEMICALS in FOOD and FEED COMMODITIES

    INDEX to PESTICIDE TYPES and FAMILIES and PART 180 TOLERANCE INFORMATION of PESTICIDE CHEMICALS in FOOD and FEED COMMODITIES

    US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pesticide Programs INDEX to PESTICIDE TYPES and FAMILIES and PART 180 TOLERANCE INFORMATION of PESTICIDE CHEMICALS in FOOD and FEED COMMODITIES Note: Pesticide tolerance information is updated in the Code of Federal Regulations on a weekly basis. EPA plans to update these indexes biannually. These indexes are current as of the date indicated in the pdf file. For the latest information on pesticide tolerances, please check the electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR) at http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_07/40cfrv23_07.html 1 40 CFR Type Family Common name CAS Number PC code 180.163 Acaricide bridged diphenyl Dicofol (1,1-Bis(chlorophenyl)-2,2,2-trichloroethanol) 115-32-2 10501 180.198 Acaricide phosphonate Trichlorfon 52-68-6 57901 180.259 Acaricide sulfite ester Propargite 2312-35-8 97601 180.446 Acaricide tetrazine Clofentezine 74115-24-5 125501 180.448 Acaricide thiazolidine Hexythiazox 78587-05-0 128849 180.517 Acaricide phenylpyrazole Fipronil 120068-37-3 129121 180.566 Acaricide pyrazole Fenpyroximate 134098-61-6 129131 180.572 Acaricide carbazate Bifenazate 149877-41-8 586 180.593 Acaricide unclassified Etoxazole 153233-91-1 107091 180.599 Acaricide unclassified Acequinocyl 57960-19-7 6329 180.341 Acaricide, fungicide dinitrophenol Dinocap (2, 4-Dinitro-6-octylphenyl crotonate and 2,6-dinitro-4- 39300-45-3 36001 octylphenyl crotonate} 180.111 Acaricide, insecticide organophosphorus Malathion 121-75-5 57701 180.182 Acaricide, insecticide cyclodiene Endosulfan 115-29-7 79401
  • U.S. EPA, Pesticide Product Label, QUINCLORAC 75 SWF, 02/06/2006

    U.S. EPA, Pesticide Product Label, QUINCLORAC 75 SWF, 02/06/2006

    u.s. ENVIRONM£~J7AL PkO';EC';ION N:JENCY EPfI, Req. Cate ~f Issuance: Office of t'esticide "roqram.<; Number: Keqistratlon Divlsion (7:'()SC) 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. WashingtrJII, D.::'. ?046D 42750- 131 FEE - 6 2006 NOTICE OF PESTICIDE: Term of Issuance: ~ Registration Conditional __ Reregistration : under r: fRJ'l., as am'?nd'O'd: Name of ~esticide Product: Quinclorac 75DF SWF Name and Address of RegIstrant ,include ZIP Codej: Albaugh, Inc. P.O. Box 2127 Valdosta, GA 31604-2127 Note: Changes in .LabEoli~fg differing in suostance from that accepted in connection with this registration must be submitted to and accepted by the Registratlon Division prior to use of the label in commerce. In any correspondence on this product always refer to the above EPA registration number. em ::he bas':s of lnformat':on f ~rr,lshed by the reg:s'Crant, the above llamed pesticide ':5 hereby roegisterea/reregJ.3terec under :::--.e federa; =nsec::':c:ide, fungicide and Rodenticide Act. Reg':straL,on is ir. no (.Jay tc be ::onstrued as an endorsement or recommendation of this product by the Agency. =n urder to protect hea~ttJ and tr.e ",nvil"onment, ::he Admir.istrator, on his motion, may at any time suspend or cancel the regi3t:::ation of a pesticide in accoraance with the Act. The acceptance of any name 1.n connection with the registration of a product under this Act is not to be construed as giving the registrant a right to -=xclusive use of the r,ame or to its use if it has been coveroed by others.
  • US EPA, Pesticide Product Label, QUINCLORAC 4L AG,03/04/2019

    US EPA, Pesticide Product Label, QUINCLORAC 4L AG,03/04/2019

    81,7('67$7(6(19,5210(17$/3527(&7,21$*(1&< :$6+,1*721'& 2)),&(2)&+(0,&$/6$)(7< $1'32//87,2135(9(17,21 0DUFK 0RUULV*DVNLQV $OEDXJK//& 32%R[ 9DOGRVWD*$ 6XEMHFW /DEHO$PHQGPHQW±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³7RGLVWULEXWHRUVHOO´LV GHILQHGXQGHU),)5$VHFWLRQ JJ DQGLWVLPSOHPHQWLQJUHJXODWLRQDW&)5 6KRXOG\RXZLVKWRDGGUHWDLQDUHIHUHQFHWRWKHFRPSDQ\¶VZHEVLWHRQ\RXUODEHOWKHQSOHDVHEH DZDUHWKDWWKHZHEVLWHEHFRPHVODEHOLQJXQGHUWKH)HGHUDO,QVHFWLFLGH)XQJLFLGHDQG5RGHQWLFLGH $FWDQGLVVXEMHFWWRUHYLHZE\WKH$JHQF\,IWKHZHEVLWHLVIDOVHRUPLVOHDGLQJWKHSURGXFW ZRXOGEHPLVEUDQGHGDQGXQODZIXOWRVHOORUGLVWULEXWHXQGHU),)5$VHFWLRQ D ( &)5 D OLVWH[DPSOHVRIVWDWHPHQWV(3$PD\FRQVLGHUIDOVHRUPLVOHDGLQJ,QDGGLWLRQ UHJDUGOHVVRIZKHWKHUDZHEVLWHLVUHIHUHQFHGRQ\RXUSURGXFW¶VODEHOFODLPVPDGHRQWKH
  • Well Water Testing Clinic—June

    Well Water Testing Clinic—June

    S ALCHA - D ELTA S OIL & W ATER C ONSERVATION D ISTRICT VOLUME 33,ISSUE 2 2ND QUARTER 2013 DATES TO REMEMBER May 27 WELL WATER TESTING CLINIC—JUNE 3-5 Memorial Day, Office Closed When is the last time you had your water testing kit includes a test for June 1 household well water tested? It’s likely arsenic, coliform, and nitrates+nitrites, Well-water Testing Kits that the majority of homeowners have along with easy-to-follow sampling available during Friendly never tested their household drinking instructions. Frontier Days, Sullivan Roadhouse area water. Drinking water can contain Following collection, samples can be contaminants that are invisible to the June 3, 4, 5 dropped off at the District office. The Well-water kits available, naked eye and harmful to human health. District will cover the cost of delivery samples due by 12:30 pm at Arsenic is a highly toxic contaminant to the lab for analysis. Results will then SWCD office and can occur naturally. It is a hazardous be mailed from the testing laboratory June 4 material and a possible carcinogen. to both the homeowner and District Board Meeting, 8:30 am Coliform bacteria are an indicator of office. July 2 the presence of fecal contamination. We are offering this Board Meeting, 8:30 am These bacteria can present a very serious kit at a reduced July 4 health risk that can cause illness and rate. For a District Independence Day, Office could signal a threat to your drinking cooperator (a pro- Closed water supply. ducer of renewable August 6 Nitrates+nitrites, over a relatively short resources and Board Meeting, 8:30 am following a con- period of time, can be very dangerous, Board meetings are usually causing serious illness to infants.
  • Corn Herbicides to Control Glyphsoate-Resistant Canola Volunteers

    Corn Herbicides to Control Glyphsoate-Resistant Canola Volunteers

    AGRONOMY SCIENCES RESEARCHRESEARCH UPDAUPDATETE Corn Herbicides to Control Glyphosate-Resistant Canola Volunteers 2013 Background Table 1. Herbicide treatments. • With the rapid adoption of glyphosate-resistant corn in Western Treatment Application Rate/Acre Canada, glyphosate-resistant canola volunteers have become a major weed concern to corn producers in the region. 1 Gly Only (Check) 1 L/acre (360g ae) • The Pest Management Regulatory Agency now allows 2 Gly + Dicamba 1 L/acre + 0.243 L/acre herbicides to be tank-mixed if they have individual registrations 3 Gly + 2,4-D 1 L/acre + 0.4 L/acre (600g/L) on the crop and have a common application timing. 4 Gly + MCPA Amine 1 L/acre + 0.45L/acre • Several herbicide options are available to control glyphosate 5 Gly + Bromoxynil 1 L/acre + 0.48 L/acre tolerant canola volunteers in corn; however, some herbicides may have undesirable effects on corn. Gly / Bromoxynil 6 1 L/acre + 0.48 L/acre (Split Application*) Objectives * Glyphosate and bromoxynil applied separately at V3 stage. • Assess crop injury and yield effects of various herbicides tank- mixed with glyphosate to control glyphosate-resistant canola • Herbicide injury scores were recorded at: volunteers in glyphosate-resistant corn. • 3-5 days after treatment • 7-10 days after treatment • Identify the most suitable post-emergence strategy for • 21-24 days after treatment managing glyphosate-resistant canola volunteers in glyphosate-resistant corn. • Other recorded observations include: • Brittle snap counts Study Description • Yield (bu/acre) & moisture (%) • Test weight (lbs/bu) • The study compared the crop response of four industry leading hybrids (Pioneer® brand and competitive) with five different Results herbicide treatments (Table 1).