DOCSLIB.ORG

Byron's Correspondence and Journals 4

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Byron's Correspondence and Journals 4 1 BYRON’S CORRESPONDENCE AND JOURNALS 10: FROM RAVENNA, JANUARY-OCTOBER 1821 Edited by Peter Cochran Abbreviations B.: Byron; Mo: Moore; H.: Hobhouse; K.: Kinnaird; M.S.: Mary Shelley; Mu.: Murray; Sh.: Shelley 1922: Lord Byron’s Correspondence Chiefly with Lady Melbourne, Mr Hobhouse, The Hon. Douglas Kinnaird, and P.B.Shelley (2 vols., John Murray 1922). BB: Byron’s Bulldog: The Letters of John Cam Hobhouse to Lord Byron, ed. Peter W.Graham (Columbus Ohio 1984) BLJ: Byron, George Gordon, Lord. Byron’s Letters and Journals. Ed. Leslie A. Marchand, 13 vols. London: John Murray 1973–94. Borgese: Borgese, Maria. L’Appassionata di Byron, con le lettere inedite fra Lord Byron e la Contessa Guiccioli. Milan: n.p., 1949. Brunner: Karl Brunner, Byron und die österreichische Polizei, Archiv für das Studium der neueren Sprachen und Literaturen, 148 (1925): 32, pp. 28-41. CMP: Lord Byron: The Complete Miscellaneous Prose. Ed. Andrew Nicholson, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991. CSS: The Life and Correspondence of the Late Robert Southey, ed. C.C.Southey, Longman, Brown, Green and Longmans, 6 vols 1849-1850. Guiccioli: Alessandro Guiccioli, I Guiccioli (1796-1848) Memorie di una Famiglia Patrizia, a cura di Annibale Alberti, (Bologna 1934). J.W.W.: Selections from the letters of Robert Southey, Ed. John Wood Warter, 4 vols, Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans, 1856. LBLI: Guiccioli, Teresa. La Vie de Lord Byron en ltalie. Tr. Michael Rees, Ed. Peter Cochran, Delaware University Press 2004. LJ: The Works of Lord Byron, Letters and Journals. Ed. R. E. Prothero, 6 vols. London: John Murray, 1899-1904. LJM: The Letters of John Murray to Lord Byron. Ed. Andrew Nicholson, Liverpool University Press, 2007. Q: Byron: A Self-Portrait; Letters and Diaries 1798 to 1824. Ed. Peter Quennell, 2 vols, John Murray, 1950. Origo: Origo, Iris. The Last Attachment: The story of Byron and Teresa Guiccioli as told in their unpublished letters and other family papers. London: Jonathan Cape, 1949. The 1971 and 1972 John Murray reprints of this book have no illustrations. Helen Marx Books, no location named, 2000. Double-page references are to the former, then the latter. Rodocanachi: E. Rodocanachi, Notes Secrètes de la Police Autrichiènne de Venise sur Byron … (Institut de France, Académie des Sciences morales et politiques, January - June 1918.) Smiles: Samuel Smiles. A Publisher and his Friends: Memoir and Correspondence of the late John Murray with an Account of the Origin and Progress of the House, 1768-1843. 2 vols. London John Murray 1891. Stocking: The Claire Clairmont Correspondence. Ed. Stocking, Marion Kingston. 2 vols. Baltimore and London. Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995. Codes: Names of writer and recipient are in bold type, with location from which sent, and date. (Source is given in round brackets beneath the title: “text from” indicates that the actual source has been seen). Where the manuscript is the source, the text is left-justified only. Where the source is a book, the text is left- and right-justified. [The address, if there is one, is given in square brackets beneath the source] “1:2” and so on indicates a page-turn on the bifolium. “1:2 and 1:3 blank” shows that not all the paper has been used. If Byron goes on to a second bifolium, or a second sheet, it’s an occasion. The address, if there is no envelope, is normally in the centre of 1:4. <Authorial deletion> <xxxxx> Irrecoverable authorial deletion <deleted> Infra-red and ultra-violet might reveal something interesting {Interlineated word or phrase} 2 E[ditoria]l A[dditio]n [ ] Illegible Hyphens: where Byron has split a word over two sides, and used a double hyphen, the effect has been re= / =tained. But, as the text is not transcribed on a line-for-line basis (except in the case of Susan Vaughan’s letters (for reasons explained at January 12th 1812), hyphens are not used when he splits a word over two lines. See April 3rd 1819 for another letter transcribed line-for-line. Underlining: sometimes Byron underlines a whole word, sometimes single syllables (for comical effect, as in “Quarterlyers”), sometimes an entire phrase, and sometimes part of a word (from haste). In all cases except the last, where the whole word is underlined, we have tried to keep to his usage, underlining with a single understroke, with two understrokes, with a heavy underlining, or with a decorative line. Signatures: As time goes on, Byron’s signature becomes less careful, but then recovers. Few of his ways of signing off can be conveyed in print. “Byron” indicates a word whose second syllable is both underlined and overlined. “BN” indicates those two letters with different degrees of dash-decoration around them. Sometimes they appear Greek. “[swirl signature]” indicates a bird’s-nest effect which can with charity be read as a capital “B”. “[scrawl]” is a long wavy line, often starting as “yrs” but with no other letters decipherable. After the death of Lady Noel, Byron regains pride in his name, and often signs “N. B.” with a decorative underlining. Byron’s Most Important Correspondents in this Section Alexander Scott (17??-18??), traveller; swam the Grand Canal with Byron Annabella Milbanke (1792-1860), Lady Byron Augusta Byron, now Augusta Leigh (1783-1851) Byron’s half-sister; the most important woman in his life Cardinal Rusconi (17??-18??), Papal Legate at Ravenna Douglas Kinnaird (1788-1830), Byron’s Cambridge friend, now his banker and London agent Elizabeth, Duchess of Devonshire (1759-1824), successor to her lover Georgiana Fanny Silvestrini (17??-18??), companion and servant to Teresa Guccioli; mistress of Lega Zambelli, Byron’s steward Francis Cohen (1788-1861; later Palgrave), Italian specialist and adviser to Murray Francis Hodgson (1781-1852), Cambridge friend of Byron Monsieur Galignani (17??-18??), famous Parisian English-language publisher Count Giuseppe Alborghetti (1776-18??) General Secretary to Cardinal Rusconi Harriett Wilson (1786-1845), celebrated courtesan Isabelle Hoppner (17??-18??), Swiss wife to the Engish Consul at Venice John Cam Hobhouse (1786-1869), Byron’s close friend and travelling companion John Hanson (1755-1841), Byron’s solicitor and surrogate father John Murray II (1778-1843), Byron’s publisher, 1812-23 Lega Zambelli (17??-18??), Byron’s steward Mary Shelley (1797-1851), formerly Mary Godwin, wife to Percy Shelley; author of Frankenstein Matthew Gregory Lewis (1775-1818), author of The Monk and The Castle Spectre Michele Leoni (1776-1858), Italian poet and translator Percy Bysshe Shelley (1792-1822), English poet, friend of Byron Richard Belgrave Hoppner (17??-18??), English Consul at Venice; friend of Byron; godson of William Gifford Samuel Rogers (1763-1855), English poet, friend of Byron Samuel Taylor Coleridge (1772-1834), poet admired by Byron; author of Christabel Scrope Berdmore Davies (1782-1852), close Cambridge friend of Byron Sharon Turner (17??-18??), lawyer and man of letters; adviser to Murray Teresa Guiccioli (1798-1873), Byron’s great Italian love; married to Count Alessandro Guiccioli Thomas Moore (1779-1852), Irish poet, close friend of Byron Ugo Foscolo (1777-1827), great Italian poet exiled in London William Bankes (1786-1855), old Cambridge friend of Byron’s William Gifford (1756-1826), Murray’s principal literary adviser; Byron’s “literary father” 3 William Stewart Rose (1775-1843), friend of Byron; Italian specialist, translator of Ariosto INDEX: 182 letters. 1821 Byron to Thomas Moore, from Ravenna, January 2nd 1821 RAVENNA JOURNAL Police Report from the State Archives of Florence, 1821 Byron to John Murray, from Ravenna, January 4th 1821 John Murray to Byron, from 50, Albemarle Street, London, January 5th 1821 Byron to John Murray, from Ravenna, January 6th 1821 Byron to John Murray, from Ravenna, January 8th 1821 Count Giuseppe Alborghetti to Byron, from Ravenna, January 10th 1821 Byron to John Murray, from Ravenna, January 11th 1821 (a) Byron to John Murray, from Ravenna, January 11th 1821 (b) Byron to Lady Byron, from Ravenna, January 11th 1821 John Murray to Byron, from 50, Albemarle Street, London, January 16th 1821 Count Giuseppe Alborghetti to Byron, from Ravenna, January 18th 1821 Byron to John Murray, from Ravenna, January 19th 1821 Byron to John Murray, from Ravenna, January 20th 1821 (a) Byron to John Murray, from Ravenna, January 20th 1821 (b) John Murray to Byron, from 50, Albemarle Street, London, January 23rd 1821 Byron to Thomas Moore, from Ravenna, January 22nd 1821 John Murray to Byron, from 50, Albemarle Street, London, January 26th 1821 Byron to John Murray, from Ravenna, January 27th 1821 John Murray to Byron, from 50, Albemarle Street, London, January 30th 1821 Byron to John Murray, from Ravenna, February 2nd 1821 Richard Belgrave Hoppner to Byron, from Venice, February 4th 1821 Byron to John Murray, from Ravenna, February 12th 1821 Byron to John Murray, from Ravenna, February 16th 1821 Count Giuseppe Alborghetti to Byron, from Ravenna, February 19th 1821 Byron to Murray, from Ravenna, February 21st 1821 Byron to Thomas Moore, from Ravenna, February 22nd 1821 Byron to John Murray, from Ravenna, February 26th 1821 Byron to Lady Byron, March 1st 1821 (not sent) Byron to John Murray, from Ravenna, March 1st 1821 John Murray to Byron, from 50, Albemarle Street, London, March 2nd 1821 Byron to John Murray, from Ravenna, March 2nd 1821 John Murray to Byron, from 50, Albemarle Street, London, March 6th 1821 Byron to John Murray, from Ravenna, March 9th 1821 Byron to John Murray, from Ravenna, March 12th 1821 Byron to John
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hegelian Master-Slave Dialectics: Lord Byron's Sardanapalus
    English Language and Literature Studies; Vol. 3, No. 1; 2013 ISSN 1925-4768 E-ISSN 1925-4776 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education Hegelian Master-Slave Dialectics: Lord Byron’s Sardanapalus Marziyeh Farivar1, Roohollah R. Sistani1 & Masoumeh Mehni2 1 School of Language studies and Linguistics, UKM, Malaysia 2 University Putra Malaysia, Malaysia Correspondence: Marziyeh Farivar, School of Language Studies and Linguistics (PPBL), Faculty of Social Science and Humanities (FSSK), University Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia. Tel: 60-173-264-628. E-mail: [email protected] Received: December 12, 2012 Accepted: January 3, 2013 Online Published: January 17, 2013 doi:10.5539/ells.v3n1p16 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ells.v3n1p16 Abstract This paper intends to discuss Byron’s “Sardanapalus” by focusing on the Hegelian master-slave dialectics. Written in 1821, “Sardanapalus” presents some trends about Lord Byron’s creation of the Byronic Hero. The Byronic hero is emotional, dreamy, and impulsive. Sardanapalus, the Byronic hero, is the Assyrian King who possesses the complicated nature of both master and slave which is the focus of this article. There are encounters of masters and slaves that consciously and unconsciously take place in this dramatic verse. Sardanapalus’ relationships to his mistress, his brother-in-law and the citizens involve a complex thesis and anti-thesis. Hegelian dialectics reflect the processes of recognition of consciousness through such thesis and anti-thesis. Bondage and lordship and dependency and independency are concepts that are within these processes. Hegel explains that the identity and role of the master and slave can be recognized when they are interacting.
    [Show full text]
  • BYRON COURTS ANNABELLA MILBANKE, AUGUST 1813-DECEMBER 1814 Edited by Peter Cochran
    BYRON COURTS ANNABELLA MILBANKE, AUGUST 1813-DECEMBER 1814 Edited by Peter Cochran If anyone doubts that some people, at least, have a programmed-in tendency to self-destruction, this correspondence should convince them. ———————— Few things are more disturbing (or funnier) than hearing someone being ironical, while pretending to themselves that they aren’t being ironical. The best or worst example is Macbeth, speaking of the witches: Infected be the air whereon they ride, And damned all those that trust them! … seeming unconscious of the fact that he trusts them, and is about to embark, encouraged by their words, on a further career of murder that will end in his death. “When I find ambiguities in your expression,” writes Annabella to Byron on August 6th 1814, “I am certain that they are created by myself, since you evidently desire at all times to be simple and perspicuous”. Annabella (born 1792) is vain, naïve, inexperienced, and “romantic”, but she’s also highly intelligent, and it’s impossible not to suspect that she knows his “ambiguities” are not “created by” herself, and that she recognizes in him someone who is the least “perspicuous” and most given to “ambiguities” who ever lived. The frequency with which both she and she quote Macbeth casually to one another (as well as, in Byron’s letters to Lady Melbourne, Richard III ) seems a subconscious way of signalling that they both know that nothing they’re about will come to good. “ … never yet was such extraordinary behaviour as her’s” is Lady Melbourne’s way of describing Annabella on April 30th 1814: I imagine she’d say the same about Byron.
    [Show full text]
  • Mudeford Sandbank News
    Where tme stands stl ISSN 1462-8503 MUDEFORD SANDBANK NEWS Issue No. 10 Summer 2005 £1.20 Beach-hut prices fall on Mudeford Sandbank One shore beyond desire On March 18th at auction (auctioneers Symonds and Sampson) a sleeping beach hut failed to meet its reserve of £80,000, confirming local knowledge that sales had stalled on the beach. Vendors have been keen to A frenzy of articles on the It is apparent from nearly sell this Spring because the sudden price slump appeared two-dozen “For Sale” signs progressive transfer fees pay- in the local media and the before the Easter holiday that able to Christchurch Council national press and even an although vendors are anxious rose on April 1st for a hut overseas newspaper just be- to sell, buyers are currently from £15,000 to £21,000 as fore Easter. Sales may yet few and far between. This is expected. Also licence fees recover if demand is restored. most unusual. have spiraled to close on But this would have to be in £2,000 per hut and although the face of vendors passing the beach has never looked on the increasing transfer fees better, the old cheap and in- to buyers. Historically, about formal ways are being sup- a dozen huts have changed planted by a new ruthless hands on average each year profit-led and cost-driven over the last 30 years. There worldliness. has been something of a (www.msbnews.co.uk) Page 1 Summer 2005 buying frenzy in the last (even bad publicity over fal- hut.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Byron: Six Poems of Separation
    1 Byron: Six Poems of Separation edited by Peter Cochran If one’s marriage were to collapse in humiliating, semi-public circumstances, and if one were in part to blame for its collapse, one’s reaction would probably be to maintain a discreet and (one would hope) a dignified silence, and to hope that the thing might blow over in a year or so. Byron’s reaction was write, and publish, poetry about it while it was still collapsing. The first two of these poems were written in London – the first is to his wife, and the next about and to her friend and confidante Mrs Clermont – before he left England, on Thursday April 25th 1816. The next three were written in Switzerland after his departure, and are addressed to his half-sister Augusta. The last one is again to his wife. They show violent contrasts in style and tone (the Epistle to Augusta is Byron’s first poem in ottava rima), and strange, contrasting aspects of Byron’s nature. That he should wish them published at all is perhaps worrying. The urge to confess without necessarily repenting was, however, deep within him. Fare Thee Well! with its elaborate air of injured innocence, and its implication that Annabella’s reasons for leaving him remain incomprehensible, sorts ill with what we know of his behaviour during the disintegration of their marriage in the latter months of 1815. John Gibson Lockhart was moved, five years later, to protest: … why, then, did you, who are both a gentleman and a nobleman, act upon this the most delicate occasion, in all probability, your life was ever to present, as if you had been neither a nobleman nor a gentleman, but some mere overweeningly conceited poet? 1 Of A Sketch from Private Life , William Gifford, Byron’s “Literary Father”, wrote to Murray: It is a dreadful picture – Caravagio outdone in his own way.
    [Show full text]
  • The Juvenalian Influence on Byronts Don Juan Approved
    THE JUVENALIAN INFLUENCE ON BYRONTS DON JUAN APPROVED: \ Minor Professor Director of tfefe Department of English Dean of the Graduate Sci'iool THE JUVENALIAN INFLUENCE ON BYRON'S DON JUAN THESIS Presented to the Graduate Council of the North Texas State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS By Diane Gardner Dunson, B. A. Denton, Texas August, 1967 PREFACE This thesis is a comparative study of Juvenal and Lord Byron, with emphasis on the particularly kindred aspects of the poets' works. The two men lived hundreds of years apart, yet their ideas and attitudes are so similar that the con- nection bears research. In many instances, the relationship between the poets is only temperamental; at other times, the subject matter of Byron reveals the direct influence of Ju- venal. This paper treats in detail the major topics of in- terest which Juvenal and Byron shared—society, morality, war, death, and the purpose of life. The first chapter on' the nature of satire serves as an introduction to the study of these topics and is designed to bridge the time gap be- tween the poets. The backgrounds of Juvenal and Byron are considered briefly to show the comparable social and politi- cal atmosphere of their early manhood. The remaining three chapters deal in detail with the subject matter of Juvenal's Satires and Byron's Don Juan, with emphasis on the modernity, soundness of judgement, and worth of that which the two men have to say. For the particular study of the Juvenalian influence on Lord Byron, and especially on Don Juan, there were no iii specific books available.
    [Show full text]
  • GEORGE GORDON, LORD BYRON: a Literary-Biographical-Critical
    1 GEORGE GORDON, LORD BYRON: A literary-biographical-critical database 2: by year CODE: From National Library in Taiwan UDD: unpublished doctoral dissertation Books and Articles Referring to Byron, by year 1813-1824: Anon. A Sermon on the Death of Byron, by a Layman —— Lines on the departure of a great poet from this country, 1816 —— An Address to the Rt. Hon. Lord Byron, with an opinion on some of his writings, 1817 —— The radical triumvirate, or, infidel Paine, Lord Byron, and Surgeon Lawrenge … A Letter to John Bull, from a Oxonian resident in London, 1820 —— A letter to the Rt. Hon. Lord Byron, protesting against the immolation of Gray, Cowper and Campbell, at the shrine of Pope, The Pamphleteer Vol 8, 1821 —— Lord Byron’s Plagiarisms, Gentleman’s Magazine, April 1821; Lord Byron Defended from a Charge of Plagiarism, ibid —— Plagiarisms of Lord Byron Detected, Monthly Magazine, August 1821, September 1821 —— A letter of expostulation to Lord Byron, on his present pursuits; with animadversions on his writings and absence from his country in the hour of danger, 1822 —— Uriel, a poetical address to Lord Byron, written on the continent, 1822 —— Lord Byron’s Residence in Greece, Westminster Review July 1824 —— Full Particulars of the much lamented Death of Lord Byron, with a Sketch of his Life, Character and Manners, London 1824 —— Robert Burns and Lord Byron, London Magazine X, August 1824 —— A sermon on the death of Lord Byron, by a Layman, 1824 Barker, Miss. Lines addressed to a noble lord; – his Lordship will know why, – by one of the small fry of the Lakes 1815 Belloc, Louise Swanton.
    [Show full text]
  • Byron's Attempts to Reform English Stage in His Historical Dramas 213
    Byron's Attempts to Reform English Stage in his Historical Dramas 213 Byron's Attempts to Reform English Stage in his Historical Dramas Mitsuhiro TAHARA I The English Romantic Age has properly been said to be one of the most prosperous and most productive age of the poetry throughout the long history of English literature. Until recently, therefore, most writers of the history of English literature have not paid special attention to the dramas of the age, with the exception of mentioning briefly to the melodramas as a sort of vulgar entertainment on the stage and the closet dramas only for the readers. The dramas composed by the great English Romantic poets, for example, The Borderers by Wordsworth, Remorse by Coleridge, Manfred and Cain by Byron, Prometheus Unbound and The Cenci by Shelley, and Otho the Great by Keats have been defined as 'closet drama' (lese-drama) which are written for the reader in the closet not for the audience in the theatre. They have been read as literary works. Their inappropriateness for the stage might probably come from their subjective style of writing the works by confessing them- selves, whereas the play on the stage should be produced objectively enough to attract a variety of audience on the spot. Here exists an unavoidable con- flict between the subjective way of writing which is based on the spontaneous creativity of the author and the objective way of producing which depends upon the popularity of the audience. Among the five Romantic poets mentioned above, it is evident that Byron 214 Mitsuhiro TAHARA had a greatest and longest interest in drama.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Lucilius and Second- Century Rome Brian W
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-18955-3 — Lucilius and Satire in Second-Century BC Rome Edited by Brian W. Breed , Elizabeth Keitel , Rex Wallace Excerpt More Information 1 Chapter 1 Introduction Lucilius and Second- Century Rome Brian W. Breed , Rex Wallace , and Elizabeth Keitel 1 ut noster Lucilius Gaius Lucilius, writing in the last third of the second century bc , eff ec- tively created the one literary genre that Romans thought of as “entirely ours,” tota nostra . For Quintilian , whose characterization of satire this is, the tradition founded by Lucilius is distinctly Roman because, unlike other genres, it is not directly taken from the Greeks. 1 Th at element of diff erentiation from established generic canons is important at the time Lucilius was writing, but there is much more to what makes Roman satire from the beginning so crucially “ours,” 2 and the poet so distinctively “one of us” in the eyes of his fellow Romans. Lucilius’ poems respond deeply to the cultural conditions in which they were created, and they give infl u- ential expression to forms and varied meanings of Roman identity. In the hands of other poets satire would continue to draw energy from the culture around it, even as defi nitions of Romanness , and Rome itself, changed. Th e texts of later Roman satirists inspired by Lucilius’ model were writ- ten after the republic that Lucilius knew and depicted in his poems had ceased to function. With this in mind Kirk Freudenburg has infl uentially called Lucilius a problem for the tradition he created. 3 As spokesman for and embodiment of a republican past, and in particular of republican lib- ertas , Lucilius founds a genre identifi ed with free speaking, so that later authors, writing under the restraints of changed political and social cir- cumstances, can never hope to attain the ideal generic purpose that was achieved by the founding father.
    [Show full text]
  • From Monster by Don Zolidis MARY GODWIN, 18 CLAIRE CLAIRMONT
    From Monster by Don Zolidis From Monster By Don Zolidis MARY GODWIN, 18 CLAIRE CLAIRMONT, 18, her step-sister 1816. Claire has just told a ghost story and is confiding her pregnancy to her step-sister. (Claire has also had an affair with Mary’s lover, Percy Shelley.) CLAIRE Did you really like it? My story? MARY I did. CLAIRE Lord Byron applauded most vigorously at the end. MARY He was your greatest champion. CLAIRE He was. Percy was silent during the entire telling, you don’t suppose he thought I wrote the story to him? MARY I have no idea. I have not spoken with him. If you are concerned as to his impressions, I suggest you ask him. He is most likely more clear on his own mind than I am. CLAIRE I shall ask him. I don’t mean to inflict pain on him – MARY I don’t believe that’s possible, Claire. CLAIRE What does that mean? MARY I believe you overestimate your impact on Percy, that’s all. CLAIRE Are you jealous? 1 From Monster by Don Zolidis MARY I have nothing to be jealous of. But simply because a man looks tenderly on you once does not mean he will feel that way forever. CLAIRE Are you referring to Byron or Percy? MARY Both. All men. You… CLAIRE Lord Byron has looked on me tenderly more than once. MARY I am sure. CLAIRE As has Percy. I don’t mean to antagonize you as you seem to feel Percy belongs exclusively to you - MARY Claire – let us leave him out of it.
    [Show full text]
  • Joseph Chamberlain and Foreign Policy, 1895-1903
    Joseph Chamberlain and Foreign Policy, 1895-1903. Dominic Michel Bray This thesis is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Phd) at The University of East Anglia. School of History. September 2015 ©”This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with the author and that use of any information derived there from must be in accordance with current UK Copyright Law. In addition, any quotation or extract must include full attribution.” Abstract This thesis investigates Joseph Chamberlain’s conceptualisations of foreign policy while colonial secretary, 1895 to 1903. While Chamberlain’s influential position has been noted in the historiography it has not been central to any study. Therefore Chamberlain’s motivation and aims are not clearly understood. Most often his ideas are contrasted with Salisbury’s, who currently enjoys a very high reputation as a realpolitck Foreign Secretary, with a clear sense of perspective and direction. This study will therefore reconsider how Chamberlain’s opinions interacted with Salisbury’s. The current debate also under-represents Balfour’s own dissention from Salisbury and his own bid to control or influence British foreign policy. Therefore, this study sits firmly within the debate on British Isolation while acknowledging the Decline debate. Chamberlain was motivated to solve the problem of defending British interests, formal and informal, while Britain suffered from over-extension. His interest in a German alliance was heightened by events in China but was not limited to them; hence he was not content with the security afforded by the Anglo-Japanese alliance.
    [Show full text]
  • Byron's Library
    1 BYRON’S LIBRARY: THE THREE BOOK SALE CATALOGUES Edited and introduced by Peter Cochran The 1813 Catalogue Throughout much of 1813, Byron was planning to go east again, not with Hobhouse this time, but with the Marquis of Sligo, who, just out of jail for abducting sailors during a period of war, was anxious to be away from the public gaze. They never went: the difficulty of finding adequate transport for themselves and their retinues, plus a report of plague in the Levant, prevented them. Sligo would have had difficulty in any case getting passage on an English ship of war. However, just how close they got to leaving is shown by the first of the three catalogues below. While still adding lines to The Giaour, Byron was within an ace of selling his library. Its catalogue is headed: A / CATALOGUE OF BOOKS, / THE PROPERTY OF A NOBLEMAN [in ink in margin: Lord Byron / J.M.] / ABOUT TO LEAVE ENGLAND / ON A TOUR OF THE MOREA. / TO WHICH ARE ADDED / A SILVER SEPULCHRAL URN, / CONTAINING / RELICS BROUGHT FROM ATHENS IN 1811, / AND / A SILVER CUP, / THE PROPERTY OF THE SAME NOBLE PERSON; / WHICH WILL BE / SOLD BY AUCTION / BY R. H. EVANS / AT HIS HOUSE, No. 26, PALL-MALL, / On Thursday July 8th, and following Day. Catalogues may be had, and the Books viewed at the / Place of Sale. / Printed by W.Bulmer and Co. Cleveland-row, St. James’ s. / 1813. It’s not usual to sell your entire library before going abroad unless you intend never to return.
    [Show full text]
  • Fortune and Romance : Boiardo in America / Edited by Jo Ann Cavallo & Charles S
    Fortune and Romance: Boiardo in America xexTS & STuOies Volume 183 Fortune and Romance Boiardo in America edited b)' Jo Ann Cavallo & Charles Ross cr)eC>iev2iL & ReMAissAMce tgxts & STuDies Tempe, Arizona 1998 The three plates that appear following page 60 are reproduced by permission of the Folger Shakespeare Library. The map of Georgia that appears on page 95 is reprinted from David Braund's Georgia in Antiquity (Oxford University Press, 1994), by permission of Oxford University Press. Figures 8, 10 and 11 are reprinted courtesy of Alinari/Art Resource, New York. Figure 9 is reprinted courtesy of Scala, Art Resource, New York. ©Copyright 1998 The Italian Academy for Advanced Studies in America at Columbia University Library of Congress Cataloging'in'Publication Data Fortune and romance : Boiardo in America / edited by Jo Ann Cavallo & Charles S. Ross p. cm. — (Medieval & Renaissance texts & studies ; 183) Most of the essays in this volume stem from the American Boiardo Quincentennial Conference, "Boiardo 1994 in America," held in Butler Library, Columbia University, Oct. 7-9, 1994, sponsored by the Italian Academy for Advanced Studies in America. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-86698-225-6 (alk. paper) 1. Boiardo, Matteo Maria, 1440 or 41-1494 — Criticism and interpreta- tion — Congresses. 1. Cavallo, Jo Ann. II. Ross, Charles Stanley. III. American Boiardo Quincentennial Conference "Boairdo 1994 in America" (1994 : Butler Library, Columbia University) IV. Italian Academy for Advanced Studies in America. V. Series. PQ4614.F67 1998 85r.2— dc21 98-11569 CIP @ This book is made to last. It is set in Goudy, smyth-sewn, and printed on acid-free paper to library specifications.
    [Show full text]