DOCSLIB.ORG

THE MARITIME TROY CULTURE (C. 3000-2200 BC.) Dissertation PART

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THE MARITIME TROY CULTURE (C. 3000-2200 BC.) Dissertation PART ANIMAL BASED ECONOMY IN TROIA AND THE TROAS DURING THE MARITIME TROY CULTURE (C. 3000-2200 BC.) AND A GENERAL SUMMARY FOR WEST ANATOLIA Dissertation zur Erlangung des Grades eines Doktors der Philosophie der Geowissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen PART I TEXT vorgelegt von Can Yümni GÜNDEM aus Adana/Türkei 2010 Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 19. 01. 2010 Dekan: Prof. Dr. Peter Grathwohl 1. Berichterstatter: Prof. Dr. Dr. Hans Peter Uerpmann 2. Berichterstatter: Prof. Dr. Nicholas J. Conard EIDESSTATTLICHE VERSICHERUNG Hiermit versichere ich, dass die vorliegende Arbeit mit dem Titel „ Animal Based Economy in Troia and the Troas during The Maritime Troy Culture (c. 3000-2200 BC.) and a General Summary for West Anatolia “ selbstständig und ohne Benutzung anderer als der von mir angegebenen Hilfsmittel verfasst habe. Alle Stellen, die wortgetreu oder sinngemäß aus anderen Veröffentlichungen entnommen sind, wurden als solche kenntlich gemacht. Diese Arbeit hat noch keine anderen Stellen zum Zwecke der Erlangung eines Doktor-Grades vorgelegt. Tübingen, 2010 (Can Yümni Gündem) 2 This dissertation is dedicated to my beloved aunt Handan Sezen (†) , to my dear pal Horst Trossbach (†) and to my wonderful family Fatma Bengü, Suavi, Ali, Meltem and Almira Ece 3 Content Acknowledgements................................................................................................................. 17 Summary................................................................................................................................. 18 Zusammenfassung.................................................................................................................. 20 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 22 1.1. Research Aims............................................................................................................... 23 2. The Maritime Troy Culture and the Early Bronze Age in Anatolia............................. 29 2.1. The Maritime Troy Culture........................................................................................... 29 2.2. The Early Bronze Age in Anatolia and the role of Troy............................................... 30 2.3. Development of the West Anatolian Cultures and EBA I ............................................ 31 2.3.1. Transition Period.................................................................................................... 32 2.3.2. EBA I/early Troy I ................................................................................................. 33 2.3.3. Early Bronze Age II: Middle-late Troy I and Troy IIa .......................................... 34 2.3.4. Early Bronze Age III/Troy IIb – III and IV ........................................................... 36 2.4. Trade during the EBA in Anatolia ................................................................................ 40 2.5 Animal lifestock and trade during the Early Bronze Age .............................................. 41 3. Archaeozoological Methods applied to the Animal Remains from Troy...................... 42 3.1. Determination of Bone Remains and Evaluation of Data............................................. 42 3.2. Measurements................................................................................................................ 44 3.3. What are Logarithmic Size indices (LSI)?.................................................................... 44 3.4. Age determination......................................................................................................... 45 3.5. Sex determination.......................................................................................................... 45 4. Animal Bone Material from Troy, Kumtepe, Yenibademli, Ulucak and Küllüoba..... 46 4.1 Animal Bone Material from Troy .................................................................................. 47 4.1.1. The distribution of the bone remains according to species in the Maritime Troy Culture ........................................................................................... 52 4.1.2. The unidentified bone material from the Maritime Troy Culture .......................... 55 Size of the mammal.......................................................................................................... 57 Medium mammals............................................................................................................ 57 4.1.3. Sheep to goat ratios and the possible Livestock in Troy during the Maritime Troy Culture.................................................................................... 57 4.2. Animal Bone Material from Kumtepe .......................................................................... 61 4.3. Animal Bone Material from Yenibademli .................................................................... 62 4.4. An Overview of the general composition of the Animal Bone Remains from Troas and Yenibademli during the Maritime Troy Culture......................................... 64 4.4.1. Distribution of Domestic Animals in Troas and Yenibademli............................... 66 4.5. Animal Bone Material from Ulucak.............................................................................. 69 4.6. Animal Bone Material from Küllüoba .......................................................................... 73 5. Remarks on the Domestic Fauna of Troy ........................................................................ 78 5.1. Sheep, OVIS and Goat, CAPRA................................................................................... 78 5.1.1. Small ruminants and the relationship of sheep to goat among mammal remains .................................................................................................. 79 5.1.2. The bone distribution of sheep, goat and sheep/goat ............................................. 81 5.1.3. The Gender of the small ruminants........................................................................ 84 5.1.3.1. Sheep ............................................................................................................... 84 5.1.3.2. Goat ................................................................................................................. 86 5.1.4. The Dental Aging of Sheep and Goat .................................................................... 86 5.1.4.1. The Dental Aging of Sheep............................................................................. 86 5.1.4.1.1. Crown height of the M3 from Sheep ........................................................ 87 5.1.4.2. The Dental Aging of Goat............................................................................... 88 5.1.4.3. The Dental Aging of Small Ruminants........................................................... 89 5.1.5. The Epiphysis Aging for Sheep and Goat.............................................................. 91 5.1.5.1. The Epiphysis Aging for Sheep ...................................................................... 92 5.1.5.2. The Epiphysis Aging for Goat ........................................................................ 94 5.1.5.3. The Epiphysis Aging for Small Ruminants..................................................... 95 5.1.6. Size of the Small Ruminants .................................................................................. 98 5.1.7. Conclusion............................................................................................................ 100 5.2. Cattle, BOS.................................................................................................................. 105 5.2.1. Bone distribution of Cattle ................................................................................... 106 5.2.2. The Gender of the Cattle Remains ....................................................................... 109 5.2.3. Kill-off pattern of Cattle....................................................................................... 110 5.2.3.1. The Dental Aging of Cattle ........................................................................... 110 5.2.3.2. Epiphysis fusion of Cattle in the Maritime Troy Culture.............................. 111 5.2.4. Size of the Cattle .................................................................................................. 111 5.2.5. Conclusions .......................................................................................................... 112 5.3. Pig, SUS ...................................................................................................................... 114 5.3.1. The bone distribution of pig................................................................................. 115 5.3.2. Pig Gender............................................................................................................ 117 5.3.3. Kill-off pattern of Pigs ......................................................................................... 117 5.3.3.1. Epiphysis fusion in Pigs ................................................................................ 117 5.3.3.2. The Dental Aging of Pig ............................................................................... 119 5.3.4. Pig Size................................................................................................................. 120 5.3.5. Conclusions .........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • University of Cincinnati
    UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI Date:___________________May 22, 2008 I, _________________________________________________________,Kristin Marie Barry hereby submit this work as part of the requirements for the degree of: Master of Architecture in: College of Design, Art, Architecture and Planning It is entitled: The New Archaeological Museum: Reuniting Place and Artifact This work and its defense approved by: Chair: _______________________________Elizabeth Riorden _______________________________Rebecca Williamson _______________________________ _______________________________ _______________________________ The New Archaeological Museum: Reuniting Place and Artifact Kristin Barry Bachelor of Science in Architecture University of Cincinnati May 30, 2008 Submittal for Master of Architecture Degree College of Design, Art, Architecture and Planning Prof. Elizabeth Riorden Abstract Although various resources have been provided at archaeological ruins for site interpretation, a recent change in education trends has led to a wider audience attending many international archaeological sites. An innovation in museum typology is needed to help tourists interpret the artifacts that been found at the site in a contextual manner. Through a study of literature by experts such as Victoria Newhouse, Stephen Wells, and other authors, and by analyzing successful interpretive center projects, I have developed a document outlining the reasons for on-site interpretive centers and their functions and used this material in a case study at the site of ancient Troy. My study produced a research document regarding museology and design strategy for the physical building, and will be applicable to any new construction on a sensitive site. I hope to establish a precedent that sites can use when adapting to this new type of visitors. iii Acknowledgements I would like to thank a number of people for their support while I have been completing this program.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Dynamics in Ionia at the End of the Second Millennium BCE
    Cultural Dynamics in Ionia at the End of the Second Millennium BCE: New Archaeological Perspectives and Prospects Edited e-Thesis The results, discussions and conclusions presented herein are identical to those in the printed version. This electronic version of the thesis has been edited solely to ensure conformance with copyright legislation and all excisions are noted in the text. The final, awarded and examined version is available for consultation via the University Library. Rik Vaessen PhD The University of Sheffield Department of Archaeology May 2014 Table of Contents List of Figures iii List of Tables vi Acknowledgments vii Abstract ix Chapter 1. Introduction 1 1.1. Setting the stage 1 1.2. Introducing the Ionians 4 1.3. Finding Late Bronze and Early Iron Age Ionia 12 Phokaia 14 Panaztepe-Menemen 16 Smyrna-Bayraklı 17 Limantepe/Klazomenai 19 Erythrai 23 Chios: Emporio and Kato Phana 24 Teos 26 Kolophon 26 Klaros 28 Metropolis-Bademgedi ǧi Tepe 29 Ephesos (Apaša) 31 Ku şadası-Kadıkalesi 33 Samos: Heraion and Pythagorio 33 Miletos 35 The Miletos-area: Assesos and Teichiussa 38 Cine-Tepecik 38 1.4. Outline of the study 39 Chapter 2. Tracing the Ionians in modern scholarship 43 2.1. Introduction 43 2.2. Dorians and Ionians: 1750-1870 43 2.3. The Ionians between 1870 and 1939 54 2.4. The Ionians and their migration become visible … or not? (1945-present) 60 2.5. The current debate in perspective 69 2.6. Final remarks 78 Chapter 3. Theoretical and methodological considerations 79 3.1. Introduction 79 3.2. Theory: some critical remarks 79 3.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Seven Churches of Revelation Turkey
    TRAVEL GUIDE SEVEN CHURCHES OF REVELATION TURKEY TURKEY Pergamum Lesbos Thyatira Sardis Izmir Chios Smyrna Philadelphia Samos Ephesus Laodicea Aegean Sea Patmos ASIA Kos 1 Rhodes ARCHEOLOGICAL MAP OF WESTERN TURKEY BULGARIA Sinanköy Manya Mt. NORTH EDİRNE KIRKLARELİ Selimiye Fatih Iron Foundry Mosque UNESCO B L A C K S E A MACEDONIA Yeni Saray Kırklareli Höyük İSTANBUL Herakleia Skotoussa (Byzantium) Krenides Linos (Constantinople) Sirra Philippi Beikos Palatianon Berge Karaevlialtı Menekşe Çatağı Prusias Tauriana Filippoi THRACE Bathonea Küçükyalı Ad hypium Morylos Dikaia Heraion teikhos Achaeology Edessa Neapolis park KOCAELİ Tragilos Antisara Abdera Perinthos Basilica UNESCO Maroneia TEKİRDAĞ (İZMİT) DÜZCE Europos Kavala Doriskos Nicomedia Pella Amphipolis Stryme Işıklar Mt. ALBANIA Allante Lete Bormiskos Thessalonica Argilos THE SEA OF MARMARA SAKARYA MACEDONIANaoussa Apollonia Thassos Ainos (ADAPAZARI) UNESCO Thermes Aegae YALOVA Ceramic Furnaces Selectum Chalastra Strepsa Berea Iznik Lake Nicea Methone Cyzicus Vergina Petralona Samothrace Parion Roman theater Acanthos Zeytinli Ada Apamela Aisa Ouranopolis Hisardere Dasaki Elimia Pydna Barçın Höyük BTHYNIA Galepsos Yenibademli Höyük BURSA UNESCO Antigonia Thyssus Apollonia (Prusa) ÇANAKKALE Manyas Zeytinlik Höyük Arisbe Lake Ulubat Phylace Dion Akrothooi Lake Sane Parthenopolis GÖKCEADA Aktopraklık O.Gazi Külliyesi BİLECİK Asprokampos Kremaste Daskyleion UNESCO Höyük Pythion Neopolis Astyra Sundiken Mts. Herakleum Paşalar Sarhöyük Mount Athos Achmilleion Troy Pessinus Potamia Mt.Olympos
    [Show full text]
  • Greece • Crete • Turkey May 28 - June 22, 2021
    GREECE • CRETE • TURKEY MAY 28 - JUNE 22, 2021 Tour Hosts: Dr. Scott Moore Dr. Jason Whitlark organized by GREECE - CRETE - TURKEY / May 28 - June 22, 2021 May 31 Mon ATHENS - CORINTH CANAL - CORINTH – ACROCORINTH - NAFPLION At 8:30a.m. depart from Athens and drive along the coastal highway of Saronic Gulf. Arrive at the Corinth Canal for a brief stop and then continue on to the Acropolis of Corinth. Acro-corinth is the citadel of Corinth. It is situated to the southwest of the ancient city and rises to an elevation of 1883 ft. [574 m.]. Today it is surrounded by walls that are about 1.85 mi. [3 km.] long. The foundations of the fortifications are ancient—going back to the Hellenistic Period. The current walls were built and rebuilt by the Byzantines, Franks, Venetians, and Ottoman Turks. Climb up and visit the fortress. Then proceed to the Ancient city of Corinth. It was to this megalopolis where the apostle Paul came and worked, established a thriving church, subsequently sending two of his epistles now part of the New Testament. Here, we see all of the sites associated with his ministry: the Agora, the Temple of Apollo, the Roman Odeon, the Bema and Gallio’s Seat. The small local archaeological museum here is an absolute must! In Romans 16:23 Paul mentions his friend Erastus and • • we will see an inscription to him at the site. In the afternoon we will drive to GREECE CRETE TURKEY Nafplion for check-in at hotel followed by dinner and overnight. (B,D) MAY 28 - JUNE 22, 2021 June 1 Tue EPIDAURAUS - MYCENAE - NAFPLION Morning visit to Mycenae where we see the remains of the prehistoric citadel Parthenon, fortified with the Cyclopean Walls, the Lionesses’ Gate, the remains of the Athens Mycenaean Palace and the Tomb of King Agamemnon in which we will actually enter.
    [Show full text]
  • South American Camelids – Origin of the Species
    SOUTH AMERICAN CAMELIDS – ORIGIN OF THE SPECIES PLEISTOCENE ANCESTOR Old World Camels VicunaLLAMA Guanaco Alpaca Hybrids Lama Dromedary Bactrian LAMA Llamas were not always confined to South America; abundant llama-like remains were found in Pleistocene deposits in the Rocky Mountains and in Central America. Some of the fossil llamas were much larger than current forms. Some species remained in North America during the last ice ages. Llama-like animals would have been a common sight in 25,000 years ago, in modern-day USA. The camelid lineage has a good fossil record indicating that North America was the original home of camelids, and that Old World camels crossed over via the Bering land bridge & after the formation of the Isthmus of Panama three million years ago; it allowed camelids to spread to South America as part of the Great American Interchange, where they evolved further. Meanwhile, North American camelids died out about 40 million years ago. Alpacas and vicuñas are in genus Vicugna. The genera Lama and Vicugna are, with the two species of true camels. Alpaca (Vicugna pacos) is a domesticated species of South American camelid. It resembles a small llama in superficial appearance. Alpacas and llamas differ in that alpacas have straight ears and llamas have banana-shaped ears. Aside from these differences, llamas are on average 30 to 60 centimeters (1 to 2 ft) taller and proportionally bigger than alpacas. Alpacas are kept in herds that graze on the level heights of the Andes of Ecuador, southern Peru, northern Bolivia, and northern Chile at an altitude of 3,500 m (11,000 ft) to 5,000 m (16,000 ft) above sea-level, throughout the year.
    [Show full text]
  • Liman Tepe/Klazomenai Antik Limani Doğu Mendireği
    Ç.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt 26, Sayı 1, 2017, Sayfa 85-101 LİMAN TEPE / KLAZOMENAİ ANTİK LİMANI DOĞU MENDİREĞİ ÇALIŞMALARI İrfan TUĞCU ÖZET Üç ayrı denize kıyısı olan Anadolu’nun, özellikle Ege ve Akdeniz kıyı şeritleri günümüzde olduğu gibi antik çağlar boyunca da deniz ticaretinin önemli rotaları olmuştur. Deniz ticaretinin gelişimine paralel olarak Anadolu sahillerinde birçok kıyı yerleşimi kurulmuştur. Bu kıyı yerleşimlerinden biri olan Liman Tepe, Klazomenai antik kentinin erken dönemlerini temsil etmektedir. İzmir Bölgesi Kazı ve Araştırmalar Projesi kapsamında 1992 yılında kazısına başlanan Liman Tepe’de 2000 yılından itibaren kara ve sualtı olmak üzere iki ayrı sektörde çalışılmaktadır. İki mendireğin kapatması ile oluşan Liman Tepe / Klazomenai antik limanının, batı yöndeki mendirek yapısının büyük bir kısmı modern Urla Limanı’nın altında kalmıştır. Bu nedenle sualtında yürütülen kazılar antik limanın doğu mendireğinde yoğunlaşmıştır. Yürütülen bu çalışmalarla limanın kullanım süreci ve olası kültürel etkileşimleri anlaşılmak istenmiştir. Anadolu’da şu an için kazısı yapılan en erken liman yapısı olan Liman Tepe / Klazomenai Antik limanın kullanım evreleri arasındaki boşluklar da bugüne kadar yürütülen çalışmalardan elde edilen verilerin beraberinde getirdiği yeni sorular olarak kaşımızda durmaktadır. Anahtar Kelimeler: Arkeoloji, sualtı arkeolojisi, antik limanlar, Liman Tepe, Klazomenai ABSTRACT Anatolia is surrounded by three different sea on three sides and its Aegean and Mediterranean coastlines were especially crucial parts of the important trade routes during the ancient periods, as they are today. Parallel to the development of sea trade, many coastal settlements have been built on the Anatolian shorelines. Being one of these coastal settlements, Limantepe represents the earlier periods of the ancient city of Klazomanae.
    [Show full text]
  • ELA Grade 6 Unit 2 - Open Response - Print
    Name: Class: Date: ELA Grade 6 Unit 2 - Open Response - Print 1 Another lesson. So that was the way they did it, eh? Buck Excerpt from The Call of the Wild confidently selected a spot, and with much fuss and waste by Jack London effort proceeded to dig a hole for himself. In a trice the heat from his body filled the confined space and he was That night Buck faced the great problem of sleeping. The asleep. The day had been long and arduous, and he slept tent, illumined by a candle, glowed warmly in the midst of soundly and comfortably, though he growled and barked the white plain; and when he, as a matter of course, and wrestled with bad dreams. entered it, both Perrault and Francois bombarded him with curses and cooking utensils, till he recovered from his Nor did he open his eyes till roused by the noises of the consternation and fled ignominiously into the outer cold. A waking camp. At first he did not know where he was. It chill wind was blowing that nipped him sharply and bit with had snowed during the night and he was completely especial venom into his wounded shoulder. He lay down buried. The snow walls pressed him on every side, and a on the snow and attempted to sleep, but the frost soon great surge of fear swept through him—the fear of the wild drove him shivering to his feet. Miserable and thing for the trap. It was a token that he was harking back disconsolate, he wandered about among the many tents, through his own life to the lives of his forebears; for he only to find that one place was as cold as another.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Networks and Knives: a Bronze Knife with Herringbone Decoration from the Citadel of Kaymakçi (Manisa Ili / Tr)
    MAGDA PIENIĄŻEK · CHRISTOPHER H. ROOSEVELT · CHRISTINA LUKE · PETER PAVÚK OF NETWORKS AND KNIVES: A BRONZE KNIFE WITH HERRINGBONE DECORATION FROM THE CITADEL OF KAYMAKÇI (MANISA İLİ / TR) During the frst season of excavations in 2014 at the Late Bronze Age (LBA) citadel of Kaymakçı (Manisa İli / TR) in western Anatolia, a bronze knife with a decorated handle was recovered (fg. 1). It belongs to a small group of solid-hilted knives, known until re- cently only from Mycenae (Argolid / GR), Psychro Cave (Lasithi / GR), and a few other Aegean sites. Therefore, this item is especially important to schol- arly debates on local western Anatolian identities and the role of Aegean and central Anatolian net- works 1. Western Anatolian 2 cultures in the 2nd mil- lennium BC remain relatively unexplored, particularly in comparison with the more established spheres of »Hittite« central Anatolia or the »Minoan« and »Mycenaean« Aegean. Excavations from Troy (Ça- nakkale İli / TR), Panaztepe (Izmir İli / TR), Limantepe (Izmir İli / TR), and Miletus (Aydın İli / TR) are helpful for understanding the Aegean coast 3, and work at Aphrodisias (Aydın İli / TR), and Beycesultan (Denizli İli / TR) informs our understanding of the interior landscape (fg. 2) 4. Excavations at the citadel of Kay- makçı afford an opportunity to examine more closely how these two spheres interacted, effectively pro- viding further evidence of East-West networks dur- ing the Middle and Late Bronze Age. The style of the knife from Kaymakçı potentially points to a tradition specifc to western Anatolia. In the text that follows, the knife is discussed in its local, regional, and inter- regional context with a specifc attention to com- paranda from western Anatolia and the eastern Aegean.
    [Show full text]
  • Livestock Important Animals on the Farm
    Canadian Foodgrains Bank Livestock Important Animals on the Farm Did you know? There are many types of livestock in the world. Which of these animals have you seen? Cows Alpaca Sheep Camel Goats Gayal Pigs Llama Chickens Water buffalo Turkeys Yak This picture is of a girl from Ethiopia, holding a New words pair of goats. In many cultures around the world Here are some new words you can learn that refer domesticated animals, called livestock, are a very to livestock! important source of food and income (money). Baby animals can be sold and the money used to Draught – (pronounced “draft”) A draught animal pay for other important things like school fees. is an animal that is very strong and is used for Livestock can be useful for wool, leather or fur, tasks such as ploughing or logging. used mostly for clothing but also for homes, tools and other household goods. Livestock is also Mount – A mount is an animal that can be ridden used as helpers on the farm! by people, such as horses or camels. Sometimes, in situations of extreme hunger Pack– A pack animal is an animal that is used to and famine, families will sell their livestock in carry supplies or people. order to buy food. This is a big problem because families might not get very much money for their livestock during famine times. Since livestock are Name these livestock animals important for food (for milk, meat, and help on the farm), it is even more difficult for people to feed themselves after their livestock is gone, even if there is food growing in the fields.
    [Show full text]
  • TÜBA-AR Sayı23.Pdf
    Prof.Dr. Harald HAUPTMANN (4 Eylül 1936 - 2 Ağustos 2018) Saygıyla anıyoruz... In Memoriam... TÜBA-AR Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi Turkish Academy of Sciences Journal of Archaeology Sayı: 23 Volume: 23 2018 TÜBA Arkeoloji (TÜBA-AR) Dergisi TÜBA-AR TÜBA-AR uluslararası hakemli bir TÜRKİYE BİLİMLER AKADEMİSİ ARKEOLOJİ DERGİSİ dergi olup TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM (SBVT) ve Avrupa İnsani Bilimler Referans TÜBA-AR, Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi (TÜBA) tarafından yıllık olarak İndeksi (ERIH PLUS) veritabanlarında yayınlanan uluslararası hakemli bir dergidir. Derginin yayın politikası, kapsamı taranmaktadır. ve içeriği ile ilgili kararlar, Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Konseyi tarafından TÜBA Journal of Archaeology belirlenen Yayın Kurulu tarafından alınır. (TÜBA-AR) TÜBA-AR is an international refereed journal and indexed in the TUBİTAK DERGİNİN KAPSAMI VE YAYIN İLKELERİ ULAKBİM (SBVT) and The European Reference Index for the Humanities TÜBA-AR dergisi ilke olarak, dönem ve coğrafi bölge sınırlaması olmadan and the Social Sciences (ERIH PLUS) arkeoloji ve arkeoloji ile bağlantılı tüm alanlarda yapılan yeni araştırma, yorum, databases. değerlendirme ve yöntemleri kapsamaktadır. Dergi arkeoloji alanında yeni yapılan çalışmalara yer vermenin yanı sıra, bir bilim akademisi yayın organı Sahibi / Owner: Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi adına olarak, arkeoloji ile bağlantılı olmak koşuluyla, sosyal bilimlerin tüm uzmanlık Prof. Dr. Ahmet Cevat ACAR alanlarına açıktır; bu alanlarda gelişen yeni yorum, yaklaşım, analizlere yer veren (Başkan / President) bir forum oluşturma işlevini de yüklenmiştir. Sorumlu Yazı İşleri Müdürü Dergi, arkeoloji ile ilgili yeni açılımları kapsamlı olarak ele almak için belirli Managing Editor Prof. Dr. Ahmet Nuri YURDUSEV bir konuya odaklanmış yazıları “dosya” şeklinde kapsamına alabilir; bu amaçla çağrılı yazarların katkısının istenmesi ya da bu bağlamda gelen istekler Yayın Basın ve Halkla İlişkiler Kurulu tarafından değerlendirir.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Pack Animal Welfare in and Around Bareilly City of India
    doi:10.5455/vetworld.2013.332-336 Assessment of pack animal welfare in and around Bareilly city of India Probhakar Biswas, Triveni Dutt, M. Patel, Reena Kamal, P.K. Bharti and Subhasish Sahu Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar - 243122, Dist. Bareilly (UP) India Corresponding author: Probhakar Biswas, email:[email protected] Received: 22-09-2012, Accepted: 06-10-2012, Published online: 15-03-2013 How to cite this article: Biswas P, Dutt T, Patel M, Kamal R, Bharti PK and Sahu S (2013) Assessment of pack animal welfare in and around Bareilly city of India, Vet. World 6(6):332-336, doi:10.5455/vetworld.2013.332-336 Abstract Aim: To assess the welfare of pack animal: Pony, Horse, Mule and Donkey in and around Bareilly city. Materials and Methods: The present study was carried out in Bareilly city and Izatnagar area of Bareilly district of Uttar Pradesh in the year 2009. Representative sample of 100 pack animal owners were selected to get the information regarding various social, personal and economic attributes of the pack animal. Further during interviewing different health and behavior pattern of animals was keenly examined. Analysis has been done as per standard procedures. Results: Most of the pack animal owners (98%) were aware of the freedom from hunger and thirst. Majority of respondents (96, 93, 81 & 85 percent) were aware of freedom from injury and disease, pain and discomfort, to express normal behavior and adequate space and freedom from fear and distress. Respondents (85%) believed that they themselves were responsible for the welfare of the animals.
    [Show full text]
  • Hellespontus Kıyılarından Bir Grup Ticari Amphora a Group of Commercial Amphorae from the Shores of Hellespont
    ISSN: 2651-4664 Arkhaia Anatolika Anadolu Arkeolojisi Araştırmaları Dergisi The Journal of Anatolian Archaeological Studies Volume 4 (2021) Hellespontus Kıyılarından Bir Grup Ticari Amphora A Group of Commercial Amphorae from the Shores of Hellespont Oğuz KOÇYİĞİT Kemal ÇİBUK https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1582-0402 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4188-5963 Rıdvan GÖLCÜK https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8683-0707 Geliş Tarihi: 23.06.2021| Kabul Tarihi: 07.07.2021 | Online Yayın Tarihi: 11.07.2021 Makale Künyesi: Koçyiğit, O., Çibuk, K. ve Gölcük, R. (2021). Hellespontus Kıyılarından Bir Grup Ticari Amphora. Arkhaia Anatolika, 4, 237-255. https://doi.org/10.32949/Arkhaia.2021.34 Arkhaia Anatolika, Anadolu Arkeolojisi Araştırmaları Dergisi “Açık Erişimli” (Open Access) bir dergidir. Kullanıcılar, dergide yayınlanan makalelerin tamamını tam metin olarak okuyabilir, indirebilir, makalelerin çıktısını alabilir ve kaynak göstermek suretiyle bilimsel çalışmalarında bu makalelerden faydalanabilir. Bunun için yayıncıdan ve yazar(lar)dan izin almasına gerek yoktur. Dergide yayınlanan makalelerin bilimsel ve hukuki sorumluluğu tamamen yazar(lar)ına aittir. Arkhaia Anatolika, The Journal of Anatolian Archaeological Studies follows Open Access as a publishing model. This model provides immediate, worldwide, barrier-free access to the full text of research articles without requiring a subscription to the articles published in this journal. Published material is freely available to all interested online readers. The scientific and legal propriety of the articles published in the journal belongs exclusively to the author(s). ISSN: 2651-4664 arkhaiaanatolika.org Arkhaia Anatolika 4 (2021) 237-255 DOI: 10.32949/Arkhaia.2021.34 Arkhaia Anatolika Araştırma Makalesi / Research Article Hellespontus Kıyılarından Bir Grup Ticari Amphora A Group of Commercial Amphorae from the Shores of Hellespont Oğuz KOÇYİĞİT Kemal ÇİBUK Rıdvan GÖLCÜK Öz Troya Müzesi’nde yer alan ve tamamı korunmuş bir grup ticari amphora, bu makalenin konusunu oluşturmaktadır.
    [Show full text]