DOCSLIB.ORG

Painting Perspective & Emotion Harmonizing Classical Humanism W

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Painting Perspective & Emotion Harmonizing Classical Humanism W Quattrocento: Painting Perspective & emotion Harmonizing classical humanism w/ Christian Church Linear perspective – single point perspective Develops in Florence ~1420s Study of perspective Brunelleschi & Alberti Rules of Perspective (published 1435) Rule 1: There is no distortion of straight lines Rule 2: There is no distortion of objects parallel to the picture plane Rule 3: Orthogonal lines converge in a single vanishing point depending on the position of the viewer’s eye Rule 4: Size diminishes relative to distance. Size reflected importance in medieval times In Renaissance all figures must obey the rules Perspective = rationalization of vision Beauty in mathematics Chiaroscuro – use of strong external light source to create volume Transition over 15 th century Start: Expensive materials (oooh & aaah factor) Gold & Ultramarine Lapis Lazuli powder End: Skill & Reputation Names matter Skill at perspective Madonna and Child (1426), Masaccio Artist intentionally created problems to solve – demonstrating skill ☺ Agonistic Masaccio Dramatic shift in painting in form & content Emotion, external lighting (chiaroscuro) Mathematically constructed space Holy Trinity (ca. 1428) Santa Maria Novella, Florence Patron: Lorenzo Lenzi Single point perspective – vanishing point Figures within and outside the structure Status shown by arrangement Trinity literally and symbolically Vertical arrangement for equality Tribute Money (ca. 1427) Brancacci Chapel in Santa Maria del Carmine, Florence Vanishing point at Christ’s head Three points in story Unusual biblical story Support for tax collection (Catasto)? Support for papacy? Chiaroscuro – strong light source from right Actual window in chapel – working with setting Use of atmospheric perspective Images in background diminish & blur Expulsion of Adam & Eve from the Garden (ca. 1425) Brancacci Chapel in Santa Maria del Carmine, Florence Anguished emotions – shame Mental shame – male (reason) Physical shame – female (emotion) Classical view of men/women Accurate body movement – contacting ground Strong light source Andre del Castagno Last Supper (1447) Refectory painting Relationship to viewers Standard 15 th century arrangement Moment of institution “This is my body” Figures meditate on the words of Christ Placement of Judas – on our side Incrustation panel reflects battle between good and evil Problems with perspective Piero della Francesca Resurrection (ca. 1463) Stylistic debt to Masaccio Pyramidal composition – Triangular composition Symmetry, stability Posture of Christ Confident, victorious, confronting viewer Focusing devices Back of soldier, color, lines Concern for form and composition over meaning Soldiers are unnatural / one has no legs Painting has two vanishing points Compare to Resurrection by Dirk Bouts Flagellation of Christ Mathematical construction of space Unusual composition / arrangement Differing interpretations Perugino Christ Delivering the Keys to the Kingdom to St. Peter (1481-1483) Sistine Chapel in Rome Walls decorated by greatest artist of 15 th century Leonardo excluded Unification of ideas of math and reason to support Church Balance, symmetry Proportional reduction of figures in background (rule 4) Use of piazzas (town squares) – ready lines Connection to Constantine / Greatness of Rome Reference to Arch of Constantine 1st Christian emperor Pope as new emperor Tribute money in mid-ground Tithes Paulo Uccello Battle of San Romano (ca. 1455) Development of perspective Arrangement of lances / bodies Foreshortening of horses Celebrates Florence’s victory over Siena Oranges at right symbolic of d’Medici Andrea Mantegna St. James led to Martyrdom (ca. 1455) “Worm’s eye view” Dead Christ (ca. 1510) Problems of foreshortening Camera degli Sposi ceiling (ca. 1465-1474) Foreshortening – new perspective Marriage – peacock (symbol of Juno) Knowledge of Roman mythology Trompe l’oeil – deceives the eye Fra Angelico Annunciation (ca. 1440 – 1445) Simplicity & serenity in perspective setting Fra Filippo Lippi Carmelite monk – marries Lucrezia Buti (nun) Madonna & Child (ca. 1455) Fashionably dressed Elegance of Quattrocento Delicate, refined Pearls as symbol of Christ Enthusiasm for light Soft glow, w/o strong shadows Even lighting Use of fluid lines Use of window to show background Rich landscape Influenced by Flemish backgrounds Brings Madonna to the foreground Humanizing features Foreground angel seems more boyish Filippino? Idealizing features Influenced Botticelli Neo-Platonism Plato: Truth from pure ideas Neo-Platonists: everything from God – God is perfect Less perfect by degree of separation from God Matter exists but has no being Given form by God Contemplation of earthly beauty leads to pure beauty Beauty = Truth ∴ Since God is source of all things he is truth If God is pure truth God is also pure beauty By thinking of earthly beauty we can approach God Sandro Botticelli Painting unifying Classicism with Medieval form Part of Medici – Neo-platonic Academy The Birth of Venus (ca. 1482) Classical figures – solid bodies Venus floats (?) Beauty – Neo-Platonic Nude from classical model Nude women proscribed during Middle Ages Rejects path of perspective to reason No math La Primavera (ca. 1477-1482) Allegory of Spring Realm of Venus Zephyr on right pursues Flora Flora turns into Spring Mercury of left parts the clouds Three graces dance .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Best of Renaissance Florence April 28 – May 6, 2019
    Alumni Travel Study From Galleries to Gardens The Best of Renaissance Florence April 28 – May 6, 2019 Featuring Study Leader Molly Bourne ’87, Professor of Art History and Coordinator of the Master’s Program in Renaissance Art at Syracuse University Florence Immerse yourself in the tranquil, elegant beauty of Italy’s grandest gardens and noble estates. Discover the beauty, drama, and creativity of the Italian Renaissance by spending a week in Florence—the “Cradle of the Renaissance”—with fellow Williams College alumni. In addition to a dazzling array of special openings, invitations into private homes, and splendid feasts of Tuscan cuisine, this tour offers the academic leadership of Molly Bourne (Williams Class of ’87), art history professor at Syracuse University Florence. From the early innovations of Giotto, Brunelleschi, and Masaccio to the grand accomplishments of Michelangelo, our itinerary will uncover the very best of Florence’s Renaissance treasury. Outside of Florence, excursions to delightful Siena and along the Piero della Francesca trail will provide perspectives on the rise of the Renaissance in Tuscany. But the program is not merely an art seminar—interactions with local food and wine experts, lunches inside beautiful private homes, meanders through stunning private gardens, and meetings with traditional artisans will complement this unforgettable journey. Study Leader MOLLY BOURNE (BA Williams ’87; PhD Harvard ’98) has taught art history at Syracuse University Florence since 1999, where she is also Coordinator of their Master’s Program in Renaissance Art History. A member of the Accademia Nazionale Virgiliana, she has also served as project researcher for the Medici Archive Project and held a fellowship at Villa I Tatti, the Harvard Center for Renaissance Studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Masaccio's Holy Trinity
    Masaccio's Holy Trinity Masaccio, Holy Trinity, c. 1427, Fresco, 667 x 317 cm, Santa Maria Novella, Florence Masaccio was the first painter in the Renaissance to incorporate Brunelleschi's discovery in his art. He did this in his fresco called The Holy Trinity, in Santa Maria Novella, in Florence. Have a close look at the painting and at this perspective diagram. Can you see the orthogonals (look for diagonal lines that appear to recede into the distance)? Because Masaccio painted from a low viewpoint -- as though we were looking up at Christ, we see the orthogonals in the ceiling, and if we traced all of the orthogonals the vanishing point would be below the base of the cross. My favorite part of this fresco is God's feet. Actually, you can only really see one of them. Why, you may ask, do I have a thing for God's feet (or foot)? Well, think about it for a minute. God is standing in this painting. Doesn't that strike you as odd just a little bit? This may not strike you all that much when you first think about it because our idea of God, our picture of him in our minds eye -- as an old man with a beard, is very much based on Renaissance images of God. So, here Masaccio imagines God as a man. Not a force or a power, or something abstract like that, but as a man. A man who stands -- his feet are foreshortened, and he weighs something and walks, and, I suppose, even has toenails! In medieval art, God was often represented by a hand, just a hand, as though God was an abstract force or power in our lives, but here he seems so much like a flesh and blood man! This is a good indication of Humanism in the Renaissance.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cambridge Companion to Piero Della Francesca
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-65254-4 - The Cambridge Companion to: Piero Della Francesca Edited by Jeryldene M. Wood Excerpt More information Introduction Jeryldene M. Wood Piero della Francesca (ca. 1415/20–92) painted for ecclesiastics, confrater- nities, and the municipal government in his native Sansepolcro, for monks and nuns in the nearby towns of Arezzo and Perugia, and for illustrious nobles throughout the Italian peninsula. Justly esteemed as one of the great painters of the early Renaissance, Piero seems to balance abstraction and naturalism effortlessly, achieving unparalleled effects of quiet power and lyrical calm in such masterpieces as the Resurrection for the town hall of Sansepolcro and the Legend of the True Cross in the church of San Francesco at Arezzo (Plate 1 and Fig. 9). In these paintings, as throughout his oeuvre, clear, rationally conceived spaces populated by simplified fig- ures and grand architecture coexist with exquisite naturalistic observations: reflections on the polished surfaces of gems and armor, luminous skies, and sparkling rivers and streams. The sixteenth-century biographer Giorgio Vasari praised Piero’s close attention to nature, the knowledge of geometry seen in his pictures, and the artist’s composition of learned treatises based on the study of Euclid.1 His perceptions about the intellectual structure of the painter’s work remain relevant to this day, for Piero’s art, like Leonardo da Vinci’s, has attracted a wide audience, appealing not only to enthusiasts of painting but also to devotees of science and mathematics. In fact, Vasari’s belief that the scholar Luca Pacioli stole Piero’s math- ematical ideas, which is expressed vehemently throughout the biography, doubtless contributed to the recognition and recovery of the painter’s writ- ings by later historians.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Santo Spirito in Florence: Brunelleschi, the Opera, the Quartiere and the Cantiere Submitted by Rocky Ruggiero to the Universi
    Santo Spirito in Florence: Brunelleschi, the Opera, the Quartiere and the Cantiere Submitted by Rocky Ruggiero to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Art History and Visual Culture In March 2017. This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. (Signature)…………………………………………………………………………….. 1 Abstract The church of Santo Spirito in Florence is universally accepted as one of the architectural works of Filippo Brunelleschi (1377-1446). It is nevertheless surprising that contrary to such buildings as San Lorenzo or the Old Sacristy, the church has received relatively little scholarly attention. Most scholarship continues to rely upon the testimony of Brunelleschi’s earliest biographer, Antonio di Tuccio Manetti, to establish an administrative and artistic initiation date for the project in the middle of Brunelleschi’s career, around 1428. Through an exhaustive analysis of the biographer’s account, and subsequent comparison to the extant documentary evidence from the period, I have been able to establish that construction actually began at a considerably later date, around 1440. It is specifically during the two and half decades after Brunelleschi’s death in 1446 that very little is known about the proceedings of the project. A largely unpublished archival source which records the machinations of the Opera (works committee) of Santo Spirito from 1446-1461, sheds considerable light on the progress of construction during this period, as well as on the role of the Opera in the realization of the church.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mazzocchio in Perspective
    Bridges 2011: Mathematics, Music, Art, Architecture, Culture The Mazzocchio in Perspective Kenneth Brecher Departments of Astronomy and Physics Boston University Boston, MA 02215, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The mazzocchio was a part of 15th century Italian headgear. It was also a kind of final exam problem for students of perspective. Painted by Uccello, drawn by Leonardo, incorporated into intarsia and prints through the 16th century, it still appears occasionally in 21st century art. Here we review its history; show 3D models made by hand in wood and using stereolithography in plastic; and report two novel visual effects seen when viewing the 3D models. Brief History of the Mazzocchio in Paintings and in Graphics The origins of the kind of geometrical mazzocchios discussed in this paper are obscure. They are said to derive from supports for headgear worn in Renaissance Italy during the 15th century. No actual three- dimensional examples survive from that period. Mazzocchios are featured in three major paintings by Paolo Uccello made between 1456 and 1460 and in his fresco of “The Flood” (Figure 1a). Leonardo Da Vinci also illustrated them and may have built models of the skeletal version in the late 15th century (cf. Figure 2a). Whether the wooden “checkerboard” version was actually worn on the head or around the neck is unclear. It seems more likely that a fabric version could have actually functioned as a headpiece. Figures 1 a (l.) & b (r.): (a) Detail from the fresco in Florence “The Flood and Waters Subsiding” by Paolo Uccello (ca. 1448) and (b) a pen and ink perspective study of a mazzocchio by Paolo Uccello (in the Louvre, Paris).
    [Show full text]
  • "Things Not Seen" in the Frescoes of Giotto
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2017 "Things Not Seen" in the Frescoes of Giotto: An Analysis of Illusory and Spiritual Depth Aaron Hubbell Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons Recommended Citation Hubbell, Aaron, ""Things Not Seen" in the Frescoes of Giotto: An Analysis of Illusory and Spiritual Depth" (2017). LSU Master's Theses. 4408. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/4408 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. "THINGS NOT SEEN" IN THE FRESCOES OF GIOTTO: AN ANALYSIS OF ILLUSORY AND SPIRITUAL DEPTH A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Louisiana State University and the School of Art in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Art History in The School of Art by Aaron T. Hubbell B.F.A., Nicholls State University, 2011 May 2017 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my thesis advisor, Dr. Elena Sifford, of the College of Art and Design for her continuous support and encouragement throughout my research and writing on this project. My gratitude also extends to Dr. Darius Spieth and Dr. Maribel Dietz as the additional readers of my thesis and for their valuable comments and input.
    [Show full text]
  • Piero Della Francesca
    the cambridge companion to Piero della Francesca Edited by Jeryldene M. Wood University ofIllinois, Urbana-Champaign published by the press syndicate of the university of cambridge The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom cambridge university press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge cb2 2ru,UK 40 West 20th Street, New York, ny 10011–4211, USA 477 Williamstown Road, Port Melbourne, vic 3207, Australia Ruiz de Alarcón 13, 28014 Madrid, Spain Dock House, The Waterfront, Cape Town 8001, South Africa http://www.cambridge.org © Cambridge University Press 2002 This book is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 2002 Printed in the United Kingdom at the University Press, Cambridge Typeface Fairfield Medium 10.5/13 pt. System QuarkXPress® [GH] A catalog record for this book is available from the British Library. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The Cambridge companion to Piero della Francesca / edited by Jeryldene M. Wood. p. cm. – (Cambridge companions to the history of art) Includes bibliographical references and index. isbn 0-521-65254-5 – ISBN 0-521-65472-6 (pbk.) 1. Piero, della Francesca, 1416?–1492 – Criticism and interpretation. 2.Art, Renaissance – Italy. 3. Art, Italian – 15th century. I. Wood, Jeryldene. II. Series. ND623.F78 C26 2002 759.5 – dc21 2001043485 isbn 0 521 65254 5 hardback isbn 0 521 65472 6 paperback I. Encyclopedias and dictionaries ag5.c26 1990 031-dc20 isbn 0 521 39538 3 hardback isbn 0 521 39539 3 paperback Contents List of Illustrations page vii Acknowledgments xiii Contributors xv Introduction 1 Jeryldene M.
    [Show full text]
  • Masaccio (1401-1428) St Peter Distributing Alms to the Poor (Ca 1425)
    COVER ART Masaccio (1401-1428) St Peter Distributing Alms to the Poor (ca 1425) OR ALMOST 6 centuries, visitors to the Bran- banking and textiles had made some families wealthy, cacci Chapel in Florence, Italy, have been but many others were left behind. Hundreds of children charmed by the toddler shown here cling- were abandoned each year by poor parents who could ing to his mother, his little rounded rump not afford to raise them. Aid for these foundlings came dangling over her arm. from private charity and from the silk industry, whose FThe frescoes that cover the chapel walls show scenes guild had agreed in 1294 to become the official protec- from the life of St Peter, one of Christ’s 12 disciples. In tor of the city’s abandoned children. While Masaccio was this panel, Peter has traveled to a town in Palestine to working on the Brancacci Chapel, across town the Os- spread the gospel and to do good works following Christ’s pedale degli Innocenti (Foundling Hospital) was being resurrection. A community of believers have sold their built by the silk guild. (The “bambino” insignia of the personal property and pooled their funds, to be distrib- American Academy of Pediatrics was later drawn from a uted according to need. Peter is shown putting money roundel on the hospital’s facade.1) into the hand of the child’s indigent mother. At their feet What motivated this voluntary transfer of wealth to lies a man named Ananias, who secretly withheld part aid poor children? Genuine altruism certainly played a of the proceeds from selling his property and who fell role: rich men had children of their own, and the Re- dead when his deception was exposed.
    [Show full text]
  • Passepartour 2019
    PASSEPARTOUR 2019 FIRENZE OLTRARNO THE KEYS OF ACCESSIBILITY Florence is a world heritage site and as such it must be accessible to all, without exclusion. Florence welcomes people with physical disabilities due to an abundance of pedestrian areas and accessible historical and artistic sites. It is also unde- niable that some routes of the city-center - similar to many other historical cities throughout the world - may present some difficulties for people using wheelchairs: for example narrow streets, tiny sidewalks that are not easily passable or not homogeneous pavement. To address this problem and provide information on which paths are the best to follow for people with physical disabilities, the Municipality of Florence in collaboration with Kinoa Srl have designed and published this Guide. The PASSEPARTOUR project is made up of four volumes, each describing four different tourist itineraries "without barriers". In addition, the guide provides a map of the historical city-center, highlighting all the areas that can be navigated with complete autonomy, or with the support of a helper. In addition, Kinoa has developed the navigation app Kimap, which acts as a companion tool to the guide for the mobility of disabled people. Kimap can be downloaded for free on every smartphone: the app shows the most accessible path to reach your desired destination and is constantly updated. We hope that this project will contribute to improve the tourist experi- ence for those visiting our marvellous City, opening the doors to its extraordinary heritage. Cecilia Del Re Councilor for Tourism of the City of Florence Florence is a world heritage site and as such it must be accessible to all, without exclusion.
    [Show full text]
  • Lorenzo Ghiberti, Gates of Paradise (East Doors), Baptistry of San Giovanni, Florence, 1425–52
    Lorenzo Ghiberti, Gates of Paradise (East Doors), Baptistry of San Giovanni, Florence, 1425–52 Florence Baptistery, constructed between 1059 and 1128 -renowned for its three sets of bronze doors with relief sculptures (south doors created by Andrea Pisano; north and east doors by Lorenzo Ghiberti) Figure from the 1804 edition of De Pictura (1435) of Leon Battista Alberti, showing the vanishing point Alberti’s treatise was the first surviving European treatise on painting. Book I is a geometry of perspective. Book II describes the good painting. Book III discusses the education and life-style of the artist “Masaccio in painting “Masaccio was a very expressed the likeness of good imitator of everything in nature so well nature, with great and that with our eyes we seemed comprehensive to see not the images of rilievo, a good things but things componitore and puro, themselves.” without ornato, because he devoted himself only to the Alamanno Rinuccini, 1472 imitation of truth and to the rilievo of his figures.” Cristoforo Landino, 1481 Masaccio, The Holy Trinity, 1427. Santa Maria Novella Church, Florence Interior of the Brancacci Chapel, Church of Santa Maria del Carmine, Florence. Frescoes by Masaccio and Masolino (c. 1423–28) and Filippino Lippi (c. 1482–84) Masaccio. Tribute Money, fresco in the Brancacci Chapel, c. 1427. (2.3x 6 m) “And since he had excellent judgment, he reflected that all the figures that did not stand firmly with their feet in foreshortening on the level, but stood on tip-toe, were lacking in all goodness of manner in the essential points, and that those who make them thus show that they do not understand foreshortening.” Vasari, Lives of Artists Raphael, Madonna of the Meadows, 1505–6, The Annunciation to the Shepherds, Cotton Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna MS Caligula A VII/1, fol.
    [Show full text]
  • Church Or Museum? Tourists, Tickets and Transformations
    CHURCH OR MUSEUM? TOURISTS, TICKETS AND TRANSFORMATIONS Jennifer Ann Ryde A thesis submitted to the University of Western Sydney for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy June, 2013 Early Image of San Lorenzo - Codex Rustici. Dedication This thesis is dedicated to my parents Jack and Sheila Ryde who were always unwavering in their support and encouragement in my life choices. This project would not have been possible without their love and care. Acknowledgements My profound thanks go to my supervisors Dr Pamela James and Dr Russell Staiff for their outstanding mentorship throughout this endeavour. They have provided me with insight, guidance, valuable discussions, enthusiasm for my research and the determination to complete. I also thank Dr Carol Liston whose encouragement was crucial to commencing this thesis. Thanks also go to my family, friends and colleagues who have been a constant source of support and encouragement especially during difficult moments of self- doubt. Particular thanks go to my Italian colleague Dr Bruno Di Biase who has been a mentor since my early days in academia and without whose ongoing support I would not have embarked on this journey. My research would have been more difficult if not for the support of the University of Western Sydney librarians, especially Ms Narelle Oliver, always most generous with her time and energy, and also Ms Jenny Davis who sought out obscure Italian texts for me. Finally, special mention goes to my wonderful daughter Alessandra for her unwavering encouragement and unconditional support as well as her technical advice and expertise. Statement of Authentication The work presented in this thesis is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, original except as acknowledged in the text.
    [Show full text]
  • Piero Della Francesca E Il L'umanesimo Matematico
    Piero della Francesca e il l’Umanesimo matematico La vita e le opere La vita di Piero della Francesca ci appare dai contorni sfumati e comunque del tutto priva di eventi memorabili, quasi interamente consacrata al mestiere della pittura. Sappiamo che Piero è nato nella cittadina di Borgo San Sepolcro da una famiglia di artigiani e commercianti probabilmente tra il 1415 e il 1420. La tappa fondamentale della sua giovinezza è la sua presenza a Firenze, ad un’età forse ancora inferiore ai vent’anni. Già nei primi anni ’40 Piero dovette tornare a Borgo San Sepolcro dove nel 1442 è documentato come consigliere comunale. Risale a questo periodo la sua prima e importante commissione,quella per il “battesimo di Cristo”. Sempre di questo periodo sono gli affreschi del “polittico della Misericordia” commissionati dalla compagnia della Misericordia di Borgo San Sepolcro. Posteri sono invece gli affreschi della “Flagellazione” e della “Sacra conversazione” dove maggiormente si riversano i caratteri della visione geometrica di Piero della Francesca. Il pittore morì il 12 ottobre 1492 , il giorno della scoperta dell'America e della fine del Medioevo, una data che segna una svolta nella storia. Nei secoli seguenti l'armoniosa coesistenza e simbiosi tra arte, cultura umanistica e scienza, gloria e vanto del Rinascimento, è venuta gradualmente a meno ed è logico chiedersi il perchè. Tra le varie cause la caduta del sistema geocentrico seguita dal successo spettacolare della nuova astronomia e della legge di Newton, un susseguirsi di rivoluzioni scientifiche che hanno generato sospetti non solo nella gerarchia ecclesiastica ma anche in chi si sentiva escluso dagli eletti; purtroppo per certi scienziati la modestia non era una virtù.
    [Show full text]