LSSIP 2020 - SWEDEN LOCAL SINGLE SKY IMPLEMENTATION Level2020 1 - Implementation Overview

Document Title LSSIP Year 2020 for Sweden

Info Centre Reference 20/12/22/88 Date of Edition 23/03/2021 LSSIP Focal Point Susann LANDQVIST - [email protected] LSSIP Contact Person Igor MARCETIC igor.marcetic@eurocontrol.int EUROCONTROL / NMD/INF/PAS LSSIP Support Team [email protected] Status Released Intended for EUROCONTROL Stakeholders Available in https://www.eurocontrol.int/service/local-single-sky-implementation- monitoring

Reference Documents

LSSIP Documents https://www.eurocontrol.int/service/local-single-sky-implementation- monitoring Master Plan Level 3 – Plan https://www.eurocontrol.int/publication/european-atm-master-plan- Edition 2020 implementation-plan-level-3 Master Plan Level 3 – Report https://www.eurocontrol.int/publication/european-atm-master-plan- Year 2020 implementation-report-level-3 European ATM Portal https://www.atmmasterplan.eu/ STATFOR Forecasts https://www.eurocontrol.int/statfor National AIP https://aro.lfv.se/Editorial/View/IAIP FAB Performance Plan https://www.transportstyrelsen.se/sv/luftfart/flygplatser-flygtrafiktjanst- och-luftrum/Flygtrafiktjanst/Prestationsplan/

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden Released Issue

APPROVAL SHEET

The following authorities have approved all parts of the LSSIP Year 2020 document and the signatures confirm the correctness of the reported information and reflect the commitment to implement the actions laid down in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 (Implementation View) – Edition 2020.

Stakeholder / Name Position Signature Organisation

Transportstyrelsen Civil Aviation and Swedish Transport Gunnar LIUNGBERG Maritime Director Agency

Ann PERSSON LFV Director General GRIVAS

Wilhelm ACR CEO WOHLFAHRT

Inspector of Military Military Authorities Anders JANSON Aviation Safety

Swedavia -Stockholm Peder GRUNDITZ Managing Director Arlanda Airport

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden Released Issue

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Summary ...... 1 Introduction ...... 12 1. National ATM Environment ...... 13 Geographical Scope ...... 13 National Stakeholders ...... 15 2. Traffic and Capacity ...... 22 Evolution of traffic in Sweden ...... 22 MALMÖ ACC ...... 23 STOCKHOLM ACC ...... 30 3. Implementation Projects ...... 35 National projects ...... 35 FAB projects ...... 36 Multinational projects ...... 37 4. Cooperation activities ...... 40 FAB Co-ordination ...... 40 Multinational cooperation initiatives...... 40 5. Implementation Objectives Progress ...... 43 State View: Overall Objective Implementation Progress ...... 43 Objective Progress per SESAR Essential Operational Changes...... 44 ICAO ASBU Implementation Progress ...... 50 Detailed Objectives Implementation progress ...... 54 6. Annexes ...... 79 A. Specialists involved in the ATM implementation reporting for Sweden ...... 79 B. National stakeholders organisation charts ...... 80 C. Implementation Objectives’ links with other plans ...... 85 D. Glossary of abbreviations ...... 90

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden Released Issue

Executive Summary

National ATM Context Member State of:

Main national stakeholders: - Transportstyrelsen - the Swedish Transport Agency; - Luftfartsverket (LFV) – the main Swedish ATS Service Provider; - Aviation Capacity Resources AB (ACR) – ATS Service Provider; - Swedavia – Swedish airport company; - The military authorities (Swedish Armed Forces); - The Swedish Accident Investigation Authority (SHK).

Main airport covered by LSSIP: There are four airports covered in this LSSIP: Stockholm Arlanda Airport, Göteborg Landvetter Airport, Malmö Airport and Umeå Airport Main national stakeholders: - Transportstyrelsen - the Swedish Transport Agency; - Luftfartsverket (LFV) – the main Swedish ATS Service Provider; - Aviation Capacity Resources AB (ACR) – ATS Service Provider; - Swedavia – Swedish airport company; - The military authorities (Swedish Armed Forces); - The Swedish Accident Investigation Authority (SHK).

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 1 Released Issue Traffic and Capacity

Traffic growth in 2019 vs 2020 and Summer Forecast (May to October inclusive) for Sweden. The average en-route delay per flight (minutes per flight) decreased to 0.0.

10% & 32% -57% 2020 2021-2025

The average en-route delay per flight (minutes per flight) Malmo ACC Stockholm ACC

0.16T 0.00 0.11T 0.00

2019 2020 2019 2020

Sweden is part of: 0.00 The DK-SE Functional Airspace Block

Number of national projects: 9 Number of FAB projects: 3 Number of multinational projects: 4

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 2 Released Issue Progress per SESAR Phase

The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the SESAR baseline (Pre-SESAR and SESAR1 non- PCP) and the PCP elements. It shows the average implementation progress for all objectives grouped by SESAR Phases, excluding those for which the State is outside the applicability area as defined on a yearly basis in the European ATM Master Plan (Level 3) 2020, i.e. disregarding the declared “NOT APPLICABLE” LSSIP progress status. The SESAR 1 (non-PCP) progress in the graphics below for this State is based on the following objectives: AOP14, AOP15, AOP16, AOP18, ATC02.9, ATC18, ATC20, COM11.2 and NAV12.

Pre-SESAR Phase 2000 2030

95%

SESAR 1 (PCP only) 2013 2025

41%

SESAR 1 (non-PCP) 2013 2030

48%

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 3 Released Issue

Progress per SESAR Essential Operational Changes and Phase

The figure below shows the progress made so far, per SESAR Essential Operational Changes, in the implementation of the SESAR baseline and the PCP elements. The percentages are calculated as an average, per EOC, of the same objectives as in the previous paragraph.

ATM 99 % Interconnected Network 17 %

Airport and TMA 98 % performance 0 % 31 %

CNS 90 % Infrastructure 40 % and Services 63 %

Digital AIM and 82 % MET Services

Fully Dynamic 95 % and Optimised 100 % Airspace 60 %

Multimodal Mobility and N/A integration of all

Airspace Users Trajectory Based 81 % Operations 50 %

Virtualisation of Service 100 % Provision

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Pre-SESAR Phase SESAR 1 (non-PCP) SESAR 1 (PCP only)

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 4 Released Issue ICAO ASBUs Progress Implementation

The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the ICAO ASBUs Blocks. The overall percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant Objectives contributing to each of the relevant ASBUs; this is a summary of the table explained in Chapter 5.3 – ICAO ASBU Implementation Progress.

Block 0 2000 2030

95%

Block 1 2009 2030

53%

Block 2 2013 2030

Block 3 2018 2025

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 5 Released Issue ATM Deployment Outlook

State Objectives

 Deployed in 2019 - 2020 - New Pan-European Network Service (NewPENS) COM12 - 100 % progress

By 2021 By 2022 By 2023 By 2024+

- Voice over Internet - Implementation of ground- - RNP 1 in TMA Operations - RNP Approach Procedures Protocol (VoIP) in En-Route ground automated co- NAV03.2 - 42 % progress to instrument RWY COM11.1 - 63 % progress ordination processes NAV10 - 91 % progress - Electronic Terrain and ITY-COTR - 97 % progress - Information Exchanges Obstacle Data (eTOD) using the SWIM Yellow TI INF07 - 85 % progress Profile - Voice over Internet INF08.1 - 02 % progress Protocol (VoIP) in Airport/Terminal COM11.2 - 40 % progress - Ensure Quality of Aeronautical Data and Aeronautical Information ITY-ADQ - 78 % progress - Aircraft Identification ITY-ACID - 72 % progress - Collaborative Flight Planning FCM03 - 98 % progress - Surveillance Performance and Interoperability ITY-SPI - 87 % progress - Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer ATC17 - 85 % progress - 8,33 kHz Air-Ground Voice Channel Spacing below FL195 ITY-AGVCS2 - 90 % progress - Traffic Complexity Assessment FCM06 - 00 % progress - Ground-Based Safety Nets ATC02.8 - 81 % progress

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 6 Released Issue Airport Objectives - Stockholm Arlanda Airport

 Deployed in 2019 - 2020 None

By 2021 By 2022 By 2023 By 2024+

- Initial Airport Operations Plan AOP11 - 00 % progress - Improve Runway and Airfield Safety with Conflicting ATC Clearances (CATC) Detection and Conformance Monitoring Alerts for Controllers (CMAC) AOP12 - 50 % progress - Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Runway Monitoring and Conflict Alerting (RMCA) (former Level 2) AOP04.2 - 55 % progress

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 7 Released Issue Overall situation of Implementation Objectives

Progress Main Objectives Topic at the end Status 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 >2025 of 2020 AOM13.1 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General 100% Completed Air Traffic (GAT) Handling AOM19.1 ASM Support Tools to Support Advanced FUA (AFUA) 0% Not * Applicable AOM19.2 ASM Management of Real-Time Airspace Data 0% Not yet * planned AOM19.3 Full Rolling ASM/ATFCM Process and ASM 0% Not yet * Information Sharing planned AOM19.4 Management of Pre-defined Airspace Configurations 0% Not * Applicable AOM21.1 Direct Routing 100% Completed AOM21.2 Free Route Airspace 100% Completed * AOP04.1(ESSA) Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control 100% Completed * System A-SMGCS Surveillance (former Level 1) AOP04.2(ESSA) Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control 55% Late * System (A-SMGCS) Runway Monitoring and Conflict Alerting (RMCA) (former Level 2) AOP05(ESSA) Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM) 100% Completed * AOP10(ESSA) Time-Based Separation 0% Not * Applicable AOP11(ESSA) Initial Airport Operations Plan 0% Late * AOP12(ESSA) Improve Runway and Airfield Safety with Conflicting 50% Late * ATC Clearances (CATC) Detection and Conformance Monitoring Alerts for Controllers (CMAC) AOP13(ESSA) Automated Assistance to Controller for Surface 0% Not yet * Movement Planning and Routing planned AOP14(ESNN) Remote Tower Services 100% Completed 2030 AOP14(ESNO) Remote Tower Services 100% Completed 2030 AOP15(ESSA) Enhanced traffic situational awareness and airport 0% Not yet 2030

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 8 Released Issue Progress Main Objectives Topic at the end Status 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 >2025 of 2020 safety nets for the vehicle drivers planned AOP16(ESSA) Guidance assistance through airfield ground lighting 0% Not yet 2030 planned AOP17(ESSA) Provision/integration of departure planning 0% Not 2030 information to NMOC Applicable AOP18(ESSA) Runway Status Lights (RWSL) 0% Not yet 2030 planned ATC02.2 Implement ground based safety nets - Short Term 100% Completed Conflict Alert (STCA) - level 2 for en-route operations ATC02.8 Ground-Based Safety Nets 81% Ongoing * ATC02.9 Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) for TMAs 100% Completed * ATC07.1(ESSA) AMAN Tools and Procedures 100% Completed * ATC12.1 Automated Support for Conflict Detection, Resolution 100% Completed * Support Information and Conformance Monitoring ATC15.1 Information Exchange with En-route in Support of 100% Completed AMAN ATC15.2 Arrival Management Extended to En-route Airspace 100% Completed * ATC16 Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 100% Completed ATC17 Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to 85% Ongoing * Controller during Coordination and Transfer ATC18 Multi-Sector Planning En-route - 1P2T 100% Completed 2030 ATC19 Enhanced AMAN-DMAN integration 0% Not yet 2030 planned ATC20 Enhanced STCA with down-linked parameters via 0% Not yet 2030 Mode S EHS planned COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS 100% Completed COM11.1 Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in En-Route 63% Ongoing * COM11.2 Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in 40% Ongoing * Airport/Terminal COM12 New Pan-European Network Service (NewPENS) 100% Completed * ENV01(ESGG) Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) 100% Completed * ENV01(ESMS) Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) 100% Completed * ENV01(ESNU) Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) 100% Completed *

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 9 Released Issue Progress Main Objectives Topic at the end Status 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 >2025 of 2020 ENV01(ESSA) Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) 100% Completed * ENV02(ESSA) Airport Collaborative Environmental Management 100% Completed 2030 ENV03(ESDF) Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) 100% Completed 2030 ENV03(ESGG) Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) 100% Completed 2030 ENV03(ESMK) Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) 100% Completed 2030 ENV03(ESMS) Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) 100% Completed 2030 ENV03(ESMT) Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) 100% Completed 2030 ENV03(ESNN) Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) 100% Completed 2030 ENV03(ESNO) Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) 100% Completed 2030 ENV03(ESNQ) Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) 100% Completed 2030 ENV03(ESNU) Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) 100% Completed 2030 ENV03(ESNZ) Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) 100% Completed 2030 ENV03(ESPA) Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) 100% Completed 2030 ENV03(ESSA) Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) 100% Completed 2030 ENV03(ESSB) Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) 100% Completed 2030 ENV03(ESSL) Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) 100% Completed 2030 ENV03(ESSV) Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) 100% Completed 2030 FCM01 Implement enhanced tactical flow management 100% Completed services FCM03 Collaborative Flight Planning 98% Ongoing * FCM04.2 Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) - Phase 2 0% Not yet * planned FCM05 Interactive Rolling NOP 0% Not yet * planned FCM06 Traffic Complexity Assessment 0% Planned * INF07 Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (eTOD) 85% Late INF08.1 Information Exchanges using the SWIM Yellow TI 2% Ongoing * Profile ITY-ACID Aircraft Identification 72% Late * ITY-ADQ Ensure Quality of Aeronautical Data and Aeronautical 78% Late Information ITY-AGDL Initial ATC Air-Ground Data Link Services 100% Completed *

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 10 Released Issue Progress Main Objectives Topic at the end Status 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 >2025 of 2020 ITY-AGVCS2 8,33 kHz Air-Ground Voice Channel Spacing below 90% Late * FL195 ITY-COTR Implementation of ground-ground automated co- 97% Late ordination processes ITY-FMTP Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol (FMTP) 100% Completed ITY-SPI Surveillance Performance and Interoperability 87% Late * NAV03.1 RNAV 1 in TMA Operations 100% Completed 2030 NAV03.2 RNP 1 in TMA Operations 42% Ongoing * NAV10 RNP Approach Procedures to instrument RWY 91% Ongoing * NAV12 ATS IFR Routes for Rotorcraft Operations 0% Not 2030 Applicable SAF11 Improve Runway Safety by Preventing Runway 100% Completed Excursions

LEGEND: * Full Operational Capability (FOC) date The Planned Implementation Date as reported in the LSSIP DB for each objective

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 11 Released Issue

Introduction

The Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) documents, as an integral part of the Master Plan (MP) Level 3 (L3)/LSSIP mechanism, constitute a short/medium term implementation plan containing ECAC States’ actions to achieve the Implementation Objectives as set out by the MP Level 3 and to improve the performance of their national ATM System. This LSSIP document describes the situation in the State at the end of December 2020, together with plans for the next years.

Chapter 1 provides an overview of the ATM institutional arrangements within the State, the membership of the State in various international organisations, the organisational structure of the main ATM players - civil and military - and their responsibilities under the national legislation. In addition, it gives an overview of the Airspace Organisation and Classification, the ATC Units and the ATM systems operated by the main ANSP;

Chapter 2 provides a comprehensive picture of the situation of Air Traffic, Capacity and ATFM Delay per each ACC in the State. It shows the evolution of Air Traffic and Delay in the last five years and the forecast for the next five years. It also presents the planned projects assumed to offer the required capacity, taking into account the current aviation situation caused by the COVID19 crisis;

Chapter 3 provides the main Implementation Projects (at national, FAB and multinational level) which contribute directly to the implementation of the MP Operational Improvements and/or Enablers and Implementation Objectives. The Level 1 document covers a high-level list of the projects showing the applicable links. All other details like description, timescale, progress made and expected contribution to the ATM Key Performance Areas provided by the State per each project are available in the Level 2 document;

Chapter 4 deals with other cooperation activities beyond Implementation Projects. It provides an overview of the FAB cooperation, as well as all other multinational initiatives, which are out of the FAB scope. The content of this chapter generally is developed and agreed in close cooperation between the States concerned;

Chapter 5 contains aggregated information at State level covering the overall level of implementation, implementation per SESAR Essential Operational Change and implementation of ICAO ASBUs. In addition, it provides the high-level information on progress and plans of each Implementation Objective. The information for each Implementation Objective is presented in boxes giving a summary of the progress and plans of implementation for each Stakeholder. The conventions used are presented at the beginning of the section.

The Level 1 document is completed with a separate document called LSSIP Level 2. This document consists of a set of tables organised in line with the list of Implementation Objectives. Each table contains all the actions planned by the four national stakeholders (REG, ASP, MIL and APO) to achieve their respective Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs) as established in the European ATM Master Plan L3 Implementation Plan Edition 2020. In addition, it covers a detailed description of the Implementation Projects for the State as extracted from the LSSIP DataBase.

The information contained in Chapter 5 – Implementation Objectives Progress is deemed sufficient to satisfy State reporting requirements towards ICAO in relation to ASBU (Aviation System Block Upgrades) monitoring.

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 12 Released Issue

1. National ATM Environment

Geographical Scope

International Membership

Sweden is a Member of the following international organisations in the field of ATM:

Organisation Since ECAC  1955 EUROCONTROL  1995 European Union  1995 EASA  2002 ICAO  1946 NATO - NO ITU  1866 EDA  2008

Geographical description of the FIR(s)

The geographical scope of this document addresses Sweden FIR. Sweden FIR is surrounded by FIR(s) of 9 States, namely Norway FIR/UIR, Kobenhavn FIR/UIR (Denmark), Rhein UIR (Germany), Warszawa FIR/UIR (Poland), Kaliningrad FIR/UIR (Russia – non-ECAC), Vilnius FIR/UIR (Lithuania), Riga FIR/UIR (Latvia), Tallinn FIR/UIR (Estonia) and Finland FIR/UIR. The Division Flight Level (DFL) is not applied in Sweden.

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 13 Released Issue

Airspace Classification and Organisation

The classification of the airspace in Sweden is shown in the following picture:

Lower limit of SUECIA CTA is FL 125 in NW part of Sweden FIR over mountainous terrain (upland area).

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 14 Released Issue ATC Units

The ATC units in the Swedish airspace, which are of concern to this LSSIP are the following:

ATC Unit Number of sectors Associated FIR(s) Remarks En-route TMA Malmö 10 2 Sweden FIR En-route call sign are the same for both Stockholm 11 3 Sweden FIR Malmö and Stockholm – “Sweden Control”.

There are two Areas of Responsibility (AoR) in Sweden FIR served by Malmö ATCC and Stockholm ACC.

In Stockholm TMA the three sectors are served by one or two additional op. positions (ARR/DEP/DIR) in order to handle the traffic in an efficient and safe manner. There is also one coordinator position to support the controllers in the TMA sectors. In general, Controlled Airspace in Sweden comprises all airspace between FL 95 and FL 660, including the airspace within TMAs and CTRs. The exception is the NW part of Sweden FIR over mountainous terrain (upland area) where the CTA lower limit is FL125.

National Stakeholders

The main National Stakeholders involved in ATM in Sweden are the following: - Transportstyrelsen - the Swedish Transport Agency; - Luftfartsverket (LFV) – the main Swedish ATS Service Provider; - Aviation Capacity Resources AB (ACR) – ATS Service Provider; - Swedavia – Swedish airport company; - The military authorities (Swedish Armed Forces); - The Swedish Accident Investigation Authority (SHK). Their activities are detailed in the following subchapters and their relationships are shown in the diagram below.

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 15 Released Issue

Civil Regulator(s)

General Information

Civil Aviation in Sweden is the responsibility of the Ministry of Enterprise and Innovation. The different national entities having regulatory responsibilities in ATM are summarised in the table below. The Swedish Transport Agency is further detailed in the following sections.

Activity in ATM: Organisation responsible Legal Basis Rule-making The Swedish Transport Luftfartslagen (2010:500) - Civil Aviation Act Agency Safety Oversight The Swedish Transport Commission Regulation (EU) No 1034/2011 Agency Enforcement actions in case The Swedish Transport Luftfartslagen (2010:500) - Civil Aviation Act of non-compliance with Agency Luftfartsförordningen ( 2010:770) - Civil Aviation safety regulatory Ordinance requirements Brottsbalken (1962:700) - Penal code Airspace The Swedish Transport Luftfartslagen (2010:500) - Civil Aviation Act Agency Luftfartsförordningen (2010:770) - Civil Aviation Ordinance Economic The Swedish Transport Commission Regulation (EU) No 391/2013 Agency Environment The Swedish Transport Luftfartslagen (2010:500) - Civil Aviation Act Agency Luftfartsförordningen (2010:770) - Civil Aviation Ordinance Security The Swedish Transport Luftfartslagen (2010:500) - Civil Aviation Act Agency and the National Luftfartsförordningen (2010:770) - Civil Aviation Police Board Ordinance Lag om luftfartsskydd (2004:1100) - Civil Aviation Security Act

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 16 Released Issue Accident investigation Swedish Accident Regulation (EU) No 996/2010 of the European Parliament Investigation Authority (SHK) and of the Council Accident Investigation Act (1990:712) Accident Investigation Ordinance (1990:717) Ordinance providing Instructions for Swedish Accident Investigation Authority (2007:860) Swedish Transport Agency Accidents and incidents not covered by EU No. 996/2010 may be investigated by the Swedish Transport Agency.

Civil Aviation Authority - Swedish Transport Agency

The Swedish Transport Agency is a government agency operating under the Ministry of Enterprise and Innovation. The core activities within Swedish Transport Agency are: Railway, Civil Aviation, Maritime, Traffic Registry and Road Traffic. The agency is institutionally separated from the ANSPs. The current organisation chart is given in Annexes. Swedish Transport Agency website: www.transportstyrelsen.se

Annual Report Y Transportstyrelsen Årsredovisning 2020 published: Transportstyrelsen årsredovisning 2020

Air Navigation Service Provider(s)

LFV

Name of the ANSP: LFV Governance: State enterprise Ownership: 100% State-owned Services provided Y/N Comment ATC en-route Y LFV is the only provider of ATC en-route in Sweden for both civil and military users. ATC approach Y ATC Aerodrome(s) Y AIS Y CNS Y MET Y Partly (MET OBS and MET briefing). ATCO training Y Certified (not for Initial training) Others Additional information: Provision of services in N other State(s): Annual Report published: Y LFV Annual Report 2019 LFV Årsredovisning 2019 (e-magin.se)

LFV’s organisation chart is given in Annexes. LFV website: www.lfv.se

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 17 Released Issue ACR

Name of the ANSP: Aviation Capacity Resources AB (ACR) Governance: Private company Ownership: Private owned Services provided Y/N Comment ATC en-route N ATC approach Y ATC Aerodrome(s) Y AIS N CNS N MET Y MET OBS at aerodromes ATCO training Y Certified (not for Initial training) Others N Additional information: Provision of services in N other State(s): Annual Report published: Y ACR Annual Report 2019 available through Scanned Document (squarespace.com)

ACR’s organisation chart is given in Annexes. ACR website: www.acr-sweden.se

ATC Systems in use

Main ANSP part of any technology alliance1 Y COOPANS

FDPS Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: Thales Upgrade2 of the ATC system is performed or planned? Upgrades are deployed twice a year as part of COOPANS development and deployment concept. Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? No Plan ATC Unit

SDPS Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: Thales Upgrade of the ATC system is performed or planned? Upgrades are deployed twice a year as part of COOPANS development and deployment concept. Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? No Plan ATC Unit

1 Technology alliance is an alliance with another service provider for joint procurement of technology from a particular supplier (e.g. COOPANS alliance) 2 Upgrade is defined as any modification that changes the operational characteristics of the system (SES Framework Regulation 549/2004, Article 2 (40))

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 18 Released Issue

Airports

General information

There are 46 instrument airports in Sweden, of which 10 airports are operated by Swedavia. The other airports are in general owned and operated by the municipality where they are located (e.g. Norrköping and Kalmar Airports). Two military aerodromes are also used for regular civil traffic. Generally, Swedish airports own the main part of the ATM related equipment and the ATS Provider is the contractor for the service.

Airport(s) covered by the LSSIP

Referring to the List of Airports in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Plan Edition 2020 – Annex 2, it is up to the individual State to decide which additional airports will be reported through LSSIP for those Objectives There are four airports covered in this LSSIP: Stockholm Arlanda Airport, Göteborg Landvetter Airport, Malmö Airport and Umeå Airport.

The EUROCONTROL Public Airport Corner also provides information for the following airport(s):

Stockholm Arlanda: https://ext.eurocontrol.int/airport_corner_public/ESSA

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 19 Released Issue Military Authorities

The Military Authorities in Sweden (Swedish Armed Forces) is an authority governed by the Swedish Parliament and the Swedish Government and is headed by the Supreme Commander. The leadership is located at the Armed Forces Headquarters in Stockholm. The Military Authorities play, during peacetime, a limited role in managing the airspace. The civil air navigation service provides service for military air traffic – hence there is no military service provider in Sweden. The legal basis for these provisions is the Swedish Civil Aviation Act (SFS 2010:500). Co-ordination between civil air navigation service providers and the military authorities is ensured through Letters of Agreements (LoAs). Besides the LoA there is an agreement between Swedish Armed Forces and Swedish Transport Agency concerning military demands for ATC. Military authorities are responsible for the certification of military aircraft and equipment, but have no other ATM regulatory or ATM provision responsibilities. This is reflected in the tables below, as well as in the LSSIP Database, in which only SLoAs for Military that address the limited regulatory power and the airspace user role are kept. The Swedish Armed Forces website: www.forsvarsmakten.se

Regulatory role

Regulatory framework and rule making

OAT GAT OAT and provision of service for OAT governed by N/A Provision of service for GAT by the Military governed N/A national legal provisions? by national legal provisions? Level of such legal provision: N/A Level of such legal provision: N/A Authority signing such legal provision: N/A Authority signing such legal provision: N/A These provisions cover: These provisions cover: Rules of the Air for OAT Organisation of military ATS for OAT Organisation of military ATS for GAT OAT/GAT Co-ordination OAT/GAT Co-ordination ATCO Training ATCO Training ATCO Licensing ATCO Licensing ANSP Certification ANSP Certification ANSP Supervision ANSP Supervision Aircrew Training Aircrew Licensing Additional Information: see explanation under the Additional Information: See OAT comment 'Military Authorities' heading Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions: about these provisions: National AIP N National AIP N National Military AIP N National Military AIP N EUROCONTROL eAIP N EUROCONTROL eAIP N Other: N Other: N

Oversight

OAT GAT National oversight body for OAT: N/A NSA (as per SES reg. 550/2004) for GAT services provided by the military: N/A Additional information: No OAT services provided by the Additional information: No GAT services provided by the military. military.

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 20 Released Issue Service Provision role

OAT GAT Services Provided: Services Provided: En-Route N Provided by LFV En-Route N Approach/TMA N Provided by LFV/ACR Approach/TMA N Airfield/TWR/GND N Provided by LFV/ACR Airfield/TWR/GND N AIS N Provided by LFV AIS N MET Y Provided by Swedish Armed MET N Forces SAR Y Provided by Swedish Maritime SAR N Administration TSA/TRA monitoring Y Provided by Swedish Armed FIS N Forces. Other: Provided by LFV Other: N Additional Information: Additional Information: LFV and ACR are the ATS service providers, LFV also provides AIS See OAT comment service.

Military ANSP providing GAT N/A If YES, since: - Duration of the - services SES certified? Certificate: Certificate issued by: N/A If NO, is this fact reported to the EC in - accordance with SES regulations? Additional Information: See above

User role

IFR inside controlled airspace, Military aircraft can OAT only GAT only Both OAT and GAT  fly?

If Military fly OAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify the available options: Free Routing  Within specific corridors only Within the regular (GAT) national route network  Under radar control  Within a special OAT route system  Under radar advisory service 

If Military fly GAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify existing special arrangements: No special arrangements Exemption from Route Charges  Exemption from flow and capacity (ATFCM) measures  Provision of ATC in UHF CNS exemptions: RVSM  8.33  Mode S  ACAS  Others: These measures are applicable only for flying in Swedish airspace

Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA) Military applies FUA requirements as specified in the Regulation No 2150/2005: Y FUA Level 1 implemented: Y

FUA Level 2 implemented: Y FUA Level 3 implemented: Y

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 21 Released Issue 2. Traffic and Capacity

Evolution of traffic in Sweden

Sweden - Annual IFR Movements 900000 Sweden - Distribution (Ref. year 2019) 800000

700000 Domestic International flights 15% 600000 Dep/Arr 34%

500000

IFR flights 400000

300000 IFR movements - Actuals IFR movements - Scenario 2 200000 IFR movements - Scenario 1

100000 IFR movements - Scenario 3 Overflights 0 51% 2016 A 2017 A 2018 A 2019 A 2020 F 2021 F 2022 F 2023 F 2024 F A = Actual

F = Forecast

EUROCONTROL Five-Year Forecast 2020-2024

IFR flights yearly growth 2017 A 2018 A 2019 A 2020 F 2021 F 2022 F 2023 F 2024 F

Sc1 -57.6% 66.7% 20.7% 8.2% 6.4% Sweden Sc2 5.4% 2.8% -0.9% -58.3% 16.2% 43.1% 14.2% 12.4% Sc3 -58.4% 13.6% 17.3% 15.2% 12.0% Sc1 -55.1% 61.9% 21.9% 8.9% 6.8% ECAC Sc2 4.0% 3.8% 0.8% -56.4% 16.6% 41.9% 14.1% 12.2% Sc3 -56.6% 14.5% 17.5% 14.8% 11.6%

2020

Traffic in Sweden decreased by 57% in 2020 compared to 2019.

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 22 Released Issue MALMÖ ACC

Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2016-2024

2020 performance

Traffic evolution (2020 vs 2019) En-route Delay (min. per flight) Malmö ACC Actual Traffic All reasons

Year -58% 0.01

Summer -70% 0.00

Summer 2020 performance assessment The average delay per flight was zero in Summer 2020.

Operational actions Achieved Comments Optimising the use of FRA when military areas are active Yes Improved ATFCM techniques Yes Continuous improvements on the ATS route network and FRA Yes sectorisation Staff available but 11 sectors not required due to Maintain appropriate level of staffing to open up to 11 sectors Yes reduced traffic levels from COVID-19 crisis Minor updates of ATM system Yes Sector configurations adapted to traffic demand Yes

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 23 Released Issue Planning Period – Summer 2021

2021 Summer Capacity Plan

Free Route Airspace

Airspace Management Optimising the use of FRA when military areas are active Advanced FUA Airport & TMA Network Integration SWEA (Swedish Airspace Project) Phase I Cooperative Traffic Management Improved ATFCM techniques Airspace Continuous improvements on the ATS route network and FRA sectorisation Procedures Staffing Maintain appropriate level of staffing to open up to 11 sectors Technical Minor updates of ATM system Capacity Sector configurations adapted to traffic demand Significant Events

Additional information

The charts below are valid for the following reference periods: - May: 17 to 23 May 2021 - June: 14 to 20 June 2021 - July: 19 to 25 July 2021 - August: 16 to 22 August 2021 - September: 13 to 19 September 2021 - October: 18 to 24 October 2021

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 24 Released Issue

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 25 Released Issue

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 26 Released Issue

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 27 Released Issue

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 28 Released Issue

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 29 Released Issue Summer 2021 Outlook No capacity issues are foreseen for Malmö ACC in Summer 2021.

STOCKHOLM ACC

Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2016-2024

2020 performance

Traffic evolution (2020 vs 2019) En-route Delay (min. per flight) Stockholm ACC Actual Traffic All reasons

Year -59% 0.00

Summer -73% 0.00

Summer 2020 performance assessment The average delay per flight was zero in Summer 2020.

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 30 Released Issue Planning Period – Summer 2021

2021 Summer Capacity Plan

Free Route Airspace

Additional information

- October: 18 to 24 October 2021

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 31 Released Issue

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 32 Released Issue

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 33 Released Issue

Summer 2021 Outlook No capacity issues are foreseen for Stockholm ACC in Summer 2021.

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 34 Released Issue 3. Implementation Projects

The tables below presents the high-level information about the main projects currently ongoing in Sweden. The details of each project are available in Chapter 2 of the Level 2 - Detailed Implementation Status document. National projects

Name of project: Organisation(s): Schedule: Progress Description: Links: A-SMGCS Level 2 SWEDAVIA (SE) 01/01/2017 - 31/12/2019 Ongoing L3: AOP04.2 implementation DP: Project 2015_291_AF2; (2015_291_AF2) Family 2.2.1 ADQ LFV (SE) 2012-2020 The project started in 2012 with the initial planning phase. During L3: ITY-ADQ 2013-2015: - ADQ awareness campaigns has been performed - AIS internal processes and routines have been adapted to meet the ADQ requirements - minor system modifications have been implemented - Service Level Agreements (SLAs) with data originators (such as airports and other parties according to chapter 2.2 in the ADQ Implementing Rule) have been signed by a majority of the stakeholders. In 2015, a procurement for an ADQ compliant AIM production system was initiated. The procurement process continued during 2016. Tender evaluation late 2016 and early 2017. Implementation late 2017-2020. Operational late 2020. ADQ implementation SWEDAVIA (SE) 01/03/2016 - 31/12/2020 - L3: ITY-ADQ Stockholm Arlanda DP: Project 2015_288_AF5; (2015_288_AF5) Family 5.3.1 DMAN Stockholm Arlanda SWEDAVIA (SE) 01/04/2016 - 30/06/2019 - L3: AOP13 Airport (2015_292_AF2) DP: Project 2015_292_AF2; Family 2.1.4

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 35 Released Issue Name of project: Organisation(s): Schedule: Progress Description: Links: Enhancement of Airport SWEDAVIA (SE) 01/08/2015 - 31/12/2019 - L3: AOP12 Safety Nets at Stockholm DP: Project 137AF2a; Arlanda Airport Family 2.2.1 Implementation of VoIP LFV (SE) 01/01/2016 - 31/05/2021 Ongoing. Upgrade of VCS and Backup VCCS in progress. Network L3: COM11.1 (2015_320_AF3) updates also in progress DP: Project 2015_320_AF3; Family 3.1.4 Implementing redundant LFV (SE) 01/01/2016 - 31/12/2020 Ready. Network services for 2nd WAN implemented. DP: Project 2015_098_AF5; WAN (2015_098_AF5) Implementation Network services for 3rd WAN installed and Family 5.2.1 commissioned. Initial AOP (2015_290_AF2) SWEDAVIA (SE) 01/10/2016 - 31/12/2021 - L3: AOP11 DP: Project 2015_290_AF2; Family 2.1.4 MUS LFV (SE) 2015-2020 Procurement done. Installation and commission started. The last L3: ITY-SPI station (Östersund MSSR) will be comissioned in February 2021

FAB projects

Name of project: Organisation(s): Schedule: Progress Description: Links: ADQ Components in the LFV (SE), Naviair (DK), 12/04/2018 - 31/12/2021 On-going DP: 2017_060_AF5 SWIM Infrastructure - SWEDAVIA (SE) upstream data inclusion in the full data chain solution - ANSP and Airport (2017_060_AF5) DK-SE FAB Aeronautical Data LFV (SE), Naviair (DK) 01/03/2016 - 31/12/2021 On-going, this project is continued into 2017_060_AF5 (= L3: ITY-ADQ Quality (ADQ) ADQ Components in the SWIM Infrastructure - upstream DP: Project 2015_099_AF5; (2015_099_AF5) data inclusion in the full data chain solution - ANSP and Family 5.3.1 Airport) Joint Programme Office (JPO) LFV (SE), Naviair (DK) 01/03/2016 - 31/12/2020 The project is completed and will be reported at the - beginning of 2021.

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 36 Released Issue Multinational projects

Name of project: Organisation(s): Schedule: Progress Description: Links: Borealis FRA Implementation ANS Finland (FI), AVINOR AS (NO), 15/02/2016 From an LFV Point of view, this Project is completed. L3: AOM21.2 (Part 2) (2015_227_AF3_A; EANS (EE), IAA-ATS Provider (IE), LFV - DP: 2015_227_AF3_A and 2015_227_AF3_B) (SE), LGS (LV), NATS (UK), Naviair (DK) 31/12/2020 2015_227_AF3_B; Family 3.2.4

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 37 Released Issue Name of project: Organisation(s): Schedule: Progress Description: Links: Harmonisation of Technical Austrocontrol (AT), CCL Service 01/01/2016 Contract with INEA changed during 2019, B4.1 replaced by DP: 2015_207_AF3_A and ATM Platform in 5 ANSP Provider (HR), IAA-ATS Provider (IE), - B3.5. 2015_207_AF3_B; Family including support of free LFV (SE), Naviair (DK) 31/12/2020 Project finalised according to plan 3.2.1 Route Airspace and Build implemented with following operational completion preparation of PCP program dates (COOPANS B3.3 , B3.4 and Build 3.3 - 14.03.2019; Build 3.4 - 29.01.2019; Build 3.5 - B4.1) (2015_207_AF3_A; 06.02.2020 2015_207_AF3_B) Project Achievements - Obsolescent hardware replaced with modern, supported and high-performance upgrades which enables support for higher system loads and capacities, ready for traffic growth - Enhanced support for FRA operations and proper processing of FRA flight plans - Improved NM compliance developed based on NM feedback - Significant reduction of queued flight plans - Implementation of „gate” concept for conditional management of FRA flights as a complement to coordination point linked conditions, resulting in increased flight profile calculation, improved coordination and general better handling of FRA flights - Reduced workload and improved situational awareness - Architectural harmonization and product (MAESTRO) version update across COOPANS - Implementation of AMA message transmission support - Enables the extension of Arrival Management to upstream airspace by sharing of time-to-lose / time-to-gain and other AMAN information - Benefits: improved approach trajectory, optimized sequencing and runway delivery - Capacity improvements for high load airport scenarios - System Capacity Upgrades including FDP re-engineered so support multithreaded operation, significantly increasing flight plan processing capacity and overall system scalability - Architectural upgrade of AMAN in remote sites, increasing capacity.

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 38 Released Issue Name of project: Organisation(s): Schedule: Progress Description: Links: NewPENS Stakeholders LFV (SE) 15/02/2016 End equipment installed at both ATCC Stockholm and ATCC DP: 2015_174_AF5_A and contribution for the - Malmö. Planning for integration and commissioning of data 2015_174_AF5_B; Family procurement and deployment 31/12/2020 flows during end of 2019. Finalized in beginning of 2020 5.1.2 of NewPENS (Part A: General Call; Part B: Cohesion Call) (2015_174_AF5_A; 2015_174_AF5_B) Sub-regional SWIM MET Danish Meteorological Institute (DK), 01/11/2016 On-going. DP: 2015_025_AF5_A and deployment to support NEFRA Finnish Meteorological Institute (FI), - 2015_025_AF5_B; Family (A & B) (2015_025_AF5_A) Swedish Meteorological and 30/06/2019 5.4.1 Hydrological Institute (SE)

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 39 Released Issue 4. Cooperation activities

FAB Co-ordination

DK-SE FAB - general:

In accordance with the reply to the Commission in 2014 and the ministry declaration 2013 enhanced cooperation between DK-SE FAB and NEFAB has been established in intra FAB arrangements at all levels. Since May 2017, full seamless FRA is in place in the entire airspace of DK-SE FAB and NEFAB.

The MET consortium NAMCon has continued their cooperation in accordance to agreed plans.

FAB Board:

DK-SE FAB Board had 2 meetings in 2020 on skype due to Covid - 19. The military authorities in Sweden and Denmark have participated as well as the national en-route providers. The main focus has been to monitor the development of the FAB and the work performed by the FAB sub groups.

Airspace:

In 2020 no meetings was held by the airspace group as no proposals from airspace users or ANSPs regarding the need for airspace changes from a FAB perspective were received.

Civil military cooperation

One meeting held due to Covid - 19 Main issue was complete agreement concerning ES D138/139.

Rule Harmonisation Group:

No activity during 2020.

Safety Oversight Group

Two Skype meetings have been held in 2020 due to Covid - 19. As NUAC HB has ceased as organisation the need of common oversight has changed to exchange of information.

Multinational cooperation initiatives

EPN – Entry Point North

Entry Point North (EPN), jointly owned by LFV, Naviair and IAA was established in 2006 and was the first transnational supplier of ATM education and training.

Today EPN operates as a Group with headquarters in Sturup, Sweden and training subsidiaries based in Hungary (EPC), Ireland (EPNI), Belgium (EPNB) and a training branch in Spain (EPNS).

EPN was created with the prime purpose to deliver standardised education of ab initios and controllers in accordance with best practices and regulations from ICAO and EC. EPN offers initial training for ATCOs and FISOs and Instructor and assessor training authorised by the Swedish authorities. EPN also delivers training and services such as ATSEP training, language training and recruitment selection.

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 40 Released Issue In addition to training of the owners own personnel, EPN offers education on a commercial basis to clients throughout Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia. The academy provides courses based on EPN’s training programme and methods.

The COOPANS alliance

The COOPANS (Co-operation between ANSPs) alliance is established between the five ANSPs IAA (Ireland), LFV (Sweden), Naviair (Denmark), Austro Control (Austria) and Croatia Control (Croatia) with Thales as supplier and partner.

The overarching purpose of the alliance is to reduce costs and reduce risks related to investments and operation for each of the five ANSPs through common training, maintenance contracts etc. This is achieved through a harmonised approach where the ATM systems are upgraded to a common COOPANS ATM system. The system utilises joint software and harmonised technical and operational procedures in order to limit specific national functionalities.

The organisation within COOPANS Alliance has been adapted to cover all the activities the Alliance is involved in. It will now cover the activities from SESAR to Realisation, including strategic planning.

A6 Alliance

The “A6 Alliance” was set up informally in 2007 between the ANSPs interested in accession to SJU membership, i.e.:

• ENAIRE, the Spanish ANSP;

• DFS, the German ANSP;

• DSNA, the French ANSP;

• ENAV, the Italian ANSP;

• NATS, the British ANSP;

• NORACON, (the NORth European and Austrian CONsortium).

After the successful cooperation for accession to SJU membership, it was decided to formalize the A6 Alliance through a Memorandum of Cooperation which was concluded in June 2011.

The aim of the cooperation and coordination between the 6 parties was to provide customer value through improving the ATM performance at a European Network Level and increasing the pace of delivering the Single European Sky. The main areas of cooperation relate to general fields of mutual interest (e.g. best practice, harmonized strategy etc.), the SESAR R&D phase and SESAR deployment phase.

The governance of the A6 Alliance is ensured by a Steering Board composed of CEOs which meets on a quarterly basis and is supported by a Strategy Board composed of senior managers. An R&D Working Group and a Deployment Working Group organize co-operation at expert level.

The A6 Alliance quickly became an important player and a key stakeholder of the Single European Sky and has made significant and remarkable contributions to the SESAR JU, for example on the occasion of the ATM Master Plan Updates (editions 2012 and 2015).

PANSA became then a full member of the A6 Alliance, which also developed a close partnership with the COOPANS[1] ANSPs, and a strong relationship with the A4 (Airlines) and the SDAG (airports) which has resulted in the setup of an industry led consortium (SESAR Deployment Alliance (SDA)). On December, 5th 2014, the European Commission tasked the SDA with the setup of the SESAR Deployment Manager, thus strengthening its legitimacy in actively contributing to SESAR deployment.

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 41 Released Issue This partnership between ANSPs led to the formal integration of COOPANS into the A6 Alliance for SESAR Deployment Manager activities in 2015 and, strengthened by its wide membership, the A6 Alliance members has been able since then to provide significant support either in logistics or in human resources to the SESAR Deployment Manager.

The A6 Alliance leads European-wide technical activities validated and co-funded by the EC for their consistency with the SES framework. Through the EC Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) financial program, successive proposals and actions driven by the SESAR Deployment Manager allowed significant contributions to ATM industry implementation projects within SESAR Common Projects deployment priority (currently only Pilot Common Project – PCP).

Moreover, in the context of SESAR2020, the B4[2] Consortium joined the A6 Alliance in 2015 and, after having been associated through an agreement established with A6 Alliance in order to authorize exchanges between their experts in the domain of R&D, Skyguide became by the end 2017 a full member of A6 through an ad-hoc consortium agreement with DSNA.

Finally, the A6, associated for the purpose to ROMATSA (Romanian ANSP) and Hungaro Control (Hungarian ANSP) and in cooperation with its A4 and SDAG partners, prepared in 2017 the establishment of SDA consortium into an AISBL[3] that became effective on 01/01/2018, for the benefit of the whole ATM industry and their end customers.

NORACON – North European and Austrian consortium

NORACON, the North European and Austrian Consortium is led by LFV and consists of Swedavia (former LFV airports) and eight European ANSPs: Austro Control (Austria), AVINOR (Norway), EANS (Estonia), Finavia (Finland), IAA (Ireland), ISAVIA (Iceland), LFV (Sweden) and Naviair (Denmark). The NORACON consortium is a formal member of the SJU during SESAR1.

The purpose of the NORACON consortium is to ensure influence on the technical development in Europe, including protecting the partners’ long-term strategic investments in the perspective of SESAR. Within the SJU, NORACON is in lead of WP8, Information Management, and is making significant contributions to both operational and technical areas.

The Borealis alliance

The members of Borealis alliance are AVINOR (Norway), EANS (Estonia), Finavia (Finland), IAA (Ireland), ISAVIA (Iceland), LFV (Sweden), LGS (Latvia), NATS (UK) and Naviair (Denmark).

The alliance is based on an Alliance Framework Agreement (AFA) signed on the 20th of June 2012. The vision of Borealis is to be the leading ANSP Alliance that enables its Members to drive better performance for stakeholders through business collaboration. By the establishment of the Borealis alliance the co-operation agreement known as NEAP (North European ANS Providers) was formally ended.

Borealis has two objectives, the first relates to delivering value through business co-operation between the Members, the second to being collectively more influential by developing and expressing a joint position on common issues. These objectives will be achieved by developing and delivering a joint Borealis business plan.

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 42 Released Issue 5. Implementation Objectives Progress

State View: Overall Objective Implementation Progress

The graph below shows progress for all Implementation Objectives (applicable and not applicable to the State).

5; [7%]

10; [13%] Completed Ongoing Planned 9; [12%] Late 42; [56%] Not yet planned Not Applicable 1; [1%] 8; [11%]

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 43 Released Issue Objective Progress per SESAR Essential Operational Changes

Legend:

 100% = Objective completed = Implementation Objective timeline (to FOC date)  ## % = Expected completion / % Progress = Completion beyond Implementation Objective timeline

<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27

COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS 100 %



COM11.1 Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in En- 63 % Route



COM11.2 Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in 40 % Airport/Terminal



ITY-ACID Aircraft Identification 72 %



ITY-AGDL Initial ATC Air-Ground Data Link Services 100 %



ITY-AGVCS2 8,33 kHz Air-Ground Voice Channel Spacing 90 % below FL195



ITY-SPI Surveillance Performance and 87 % Interoperability



NAV10 RNP Approach Procedures to instrument 91 % RWY



LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 44 Released Issue <17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27

AOM13.1 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and 100 % General Air Traffic (GAT) Handling



AOP11 Initial Airport Operations Plan

ESSA - Stockholm Arlanda Airport  0 %

COM12 New Pan-European Network Service 100 % (NewPENS)



FCM03 Collaborative Flight Planning 98 %



FCM04.2 Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) - 0 % Phase 2



FCM05 Interactive Rolling NOP 0 %



FCM06 Traffic Complexity Assessment 0 %



INF08.1 Information Exchanges using the SWIM 2 % Yellow TI Profile



<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27

INF07 Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (eTOD) 85 %



ITY-ADQ Ensure Quality of Aeronautical Data and 78 % Aeronautical Information



LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 45 Released Issue <17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27

AOP14 Remote Tower Services

ESNN - SUNDSVALL-HARNOSAND 100 % 

ESNO - ORNSKOLDSVIK 100 % 

<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27

AOP04.1 Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System A-SMGCS Surveillance (former Level 1)

ESSA - Stockholm Arlanda Airport  100 %

AOP04.2 Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Runway Monitoring and Conflict Alerting (RMCA) (former Level 2)

ESSA - Stockholm Arlanda Airport  55 %

AOP05 Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A- CDM)

ESSA - Stockholm Arlanda Airport  100 %

AOP12 Improve Runway and Airfield Safety with Conflicting ATC Clearances (CATC) Detection and Conformance Monitoring Alerts for Controllers (CMAC)

ESSA - Stockholm Arlanda Airport  50 %

AOP13 Automated Assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing

ESSA - Stockholm Arlanda Airport  0 %

AOP15 Enhanced traffic situational awareness and airport safety nets for the vehicle drivers

ESSA - Stockholm Arlanda Airport 0 % 

AOP16 Guidance assistance through airfield ground lighting

ESSA - Stockholm Arlanda Airport 0 % 

AOP18 Runway Status Lights (RWSL)

ESSA - Stockholm Arlanda Airport 0 % 

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 46 Released Issue ATC07.1 AMAN Tools and Procedures

ESSA - Stockholm Arlanda Airport  100 %

ATC19 Enhanced AMAN-DMAN integration 0 %



ENV01 Continuous Descent Operations (CDO)

ESGG - Göteborg Landvetter Airport  100 %

ESMS - Malmö Airport  100 %

ESNU - Umeå Airport  100 %

ESSA - Stockholm Arlanda Airport  100 %

ENV02 Airport Collaborative Environmental Management

ESSA - Stockholm Arlanda Airport 100 % 

ENV03 Continuous Climb Operations (CCO)

ESDF - RONNEBY 100 % 

ESGG - Göteborg Landvetter Airport 100 % 

ESMK - KRISTIANSTAD 100 % 

ESMS - Malmö Airport 100 % 

ESMT - HALMSTAD 100 % 

ESNN - SUNDSVALL-HARNOSAND 100 % 

ESNO - ORNSKOLDSVIK 100 % 

ESNQ - KIRUNA 100 % 

ESNU - Umeå Airport 100 % 

ESNZ - ARE OSTERSUND 100 % 

ESPA - LULEA/KALLAX 100 % 

ESSA - Stockholm Arlanda Airport 100 % 

ESSB - Stockholm Bromma Airport 100 % 

ESSL - LINKOPING/SAAB 100 % 

ESSV - VISBY 100 % 

NAV03.1 RNAV 1 in TMA Operations 100% 

NAV03.2 RNP 1 in TMA Operations 42 %



SAF11 Improve Runway Safety by Preventing 100 % Runway Excursions



LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 47 Released Issue <17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27

AOM19.2 ASM Management of Real-Time Airspace 0 % Data



AOM19.3 Full Rolling ASM/ATFCM Process and ASM 0 % Information Sharing



AOM21.1 Direct Routing 100 %



ATC12.1 Automated Support for Conflict Detection, 100 % Resolution Support Information and Conformance Monitoring



ATC15.1 Information Exchange with En-route in 100 % Support of AMAN



ATC15.2 Arrival Management Extended to En-route 100 % Airspace



ATC17 Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance 85 % to Controller during Coordination and Transfer



100 ATC18 Multi-Sector Planning En-route - 1P2T % 

ITY-FMTP Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol 100 % (FMTP)



LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 48 Released Issue <17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27

ATC02.8 Ground-Based Safety Nets 81 %



ATC02.9 Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) for TMAs 100 %



ATC20 Enhanced STCA with down-linked 0 % parameters via Mode S EHS



This EOC Chart is not applicable for Sweden since the Objective NAV12 is not applicable

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 49 Released Issue ICAO ASBU Implementation Progress

The following tables show, for each of the ASBU Elements belonging to a particular ASBU Thread and Block, the overall status, the final date foreseen for completion and the percentage of progress achieved in the current cycle.

These results were determined using the LSSIP Year 2020 declared statuses and progress of the relevant implementation objectives in accordance with the initial mapping between ATM Master Plan Level 3 and new ICAO GANP 6th Edition (2019), as reflected in the Implementation Plan 2020. A comprehensive analysis performed as part of the ongoing ICAO EURGANT Project Team activity may result in updating the mapping following EASPG approval.

Legend:

= Completed (during 2020 or before) = Missing planning date = Progress achieved in 2020 = Not applicable

ACAS

<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27

ACAS-B1/1 ACAS Improvements 100 %

ACDM

<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27

ACDM-B0/2 Integration with ATM Network function 100 %

AMET

<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27

AMET-B2/4 Meteorological information service in SWIM 100 % 2.0 %

APTA

<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27

APTA-B0/1 PBN Approaches (with basic capabilities) 100 % 91.0 % APTA-B0/2 PBN SID and STAR procedures (with basic 100 % capabilities)

APTA-B0/4 CDO (Basic) 100 %

APTA-B0/5 CCO (Basic) 100 %

APTA-B1/1 PBN Approaches (with advanced 100 % capabilities) 91.0 % APTA-B1/2 PBN SID and STAR procedures (with 100 % advanced capabilities) 42.0 %

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 50 Released Issue ASUR

<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27

ASUR-B0/1 Automatic Dependent Surveillance 100 % Broadcast (ADS-B) 87.0 % ASUR-B0/3 Cooperative Surveillance Radar Downlink of 100 % Aircraft Parameters (SSR-DAPS) 87.0 %

COMI

<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27

COMI-B0/4 VHF Data Link (VDL) Mode 2 Basic 100 %

COMI-B0/7 ATS Message Handling System (AMHS) 100 %

COMI-B1/1 Ground-Ground Aeronautical 100 % Telecommunication Network/Internet Protocol Suite (ATN/IPS)

COMI-B1/2 VHF Data Link (VDL) Mode 2 Multi- 100 % Frequency

COMI-B2/1 Air-Ground ATN/IPS 100 % 51.5 %

DAIM

<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27

DAIM-B1/3 Provision of digital terrain data sets 100 % 85.0 % DAIM-B1/4 Provision of digital obstacle data sets 100 % 85.0 % DAIM-B2/1 Dissemination of aeronautical information in 100 % a SWIM environment 2.0 %

FICE

<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27

FICE-B0/1 Automated basic inter facility data exchange 100 % (AIDC) 97.0 %

FRTO

<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27

FRTO-B0/1 Direct routing (DCT) 100 %

FRTO-B1/1 Free Route Airspace (FRA) 100 %

FRTO-B1/3 Advanced Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA) and No Plan management of real time airspace data

FRTO-B1/5 Enhanced Conflict Detection Tools and 100 % Conformance Monitoring

FRTO-B1/6 Multi-Sector Planning 100 %

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 51 Released Issue NAVS

<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27

NAVS-B0/2 Satellite Based Augmentation Systems 100 % (SBAS) 91.0 %

NOPS

<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27

NOPS-B0/2 Collaborative Network Flight Updates 100 % 99.0 % NOPS-B0/4 Initial Airport/ATFM slots and A-CDM 100 % Network Interface

NOPS-B1/1 Short Term ATFM measures No Plan

NOPS-B1/2 Enhanced Network Operations Planning No Plan

NOPS-B1/3 Enhanced integration of Airport operations 100 % planning with network operations planning 0.0 % NOPS-B1/4 Dynamic Traffic Complexity Management 100 % 0.0 % NOPS-B1/5 Full integration of airspace management No Plan with air traffic flow management

NOPS-B1/8 Extended Arrival Management supported by 100 % the ATM Network function

RATS

<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27

RATS-B1/1 Remotely Operated Aerodrome Air Traffic 100 % Services

RSEQ

<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27

RSEQ-B0/1 Arrival Management 100 %

RSEQ-B0/2 Departure Management 100 %

RSEQ-B1/1 Extended arrival metering 100 %

RSEQ-B2/1 Integration of arrival and departure No Plan management

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 52 Released Issue SNET

<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27

SNET-B0/1 Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) 100 % 90.5 % SNET-B0/2 Minimum Safe Altitude Warning (MSAW) 100 % 81.0 % SNET-B0/3 Area Proximity Warning (APW) 100 % 81.0 % SNET-B0/4 Approach Path Monitoring (APM) 100 % 81.0 % SNET-B1/1 Enhanced STCA with aircraft parameters No Plan

SNET-B1/2 Enhanced STCA in complex TMAs 100 %

SURF

<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27

SURF-B0/2 Comprehensive situational awareness of 100 % surface operations

SURF-B0/3 Initial ATCO alerting service for surface 100 % operations 55.0 % SURF-B1/1 Advanced features using visual aids to No Plan support traffic management during ground operations

SURF-B1/3 Enhanced ATCO alerting service for surface 100 % operations 50.0 % SURF-B1/4 Routing service to support ATCO surface No Plan operations management

SURF-B2/2 Comprehensive vehicle driver situational No Plan awareness on the airport surface

SURF-B2/3 Conflict alerting for pilots for runway No Plan operations

SWIM

<17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >27

SWIM-B3/1 Air/Ground SWIM for safety critical 100 % information 2.0 %

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 53 Released Issue Detailed Objectives Implementation progress

Objective/Stakeholder Progress Code: Completed Not yet planned Ongoing Not Applicable Planned Missing Data Late

Main Objectives

Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) Handling AOM13.1 Timescales: 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 - Handling of Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) is harmonised. 30/11/2012 REG (By:12/2018) Not Mil. - - 0% Applicable Authority - SWE Completed National legislation is published and updated in accordance with Transport 100% EUROAT. 31/03/2012 Agency ASP (By:12/2018) Comply to common principles rules and procedures for OAT handling Completed ACR 100% and OAT/GAT interface according to national legislation. 30/11/2012 Common principles for EUROAT according to Swedish regulation are Completed LFV 100% applied. 30/11/2012 MIL (By:12/2018) Military aeronautical information is migrated to EAD. Mil. Authority has Completed Mil. no ATM Service Provision role and no ATM Regulatory power, so the 100% Authority 31/12/2010 ASP and REG SLoAs are 'Not Applicable'.

ASM Support Tools to Support Advanced FUA (AFUA) Not AOM19.1 (Outside Applicability Area) 0% Applicable Timescales: - not applicable - - LFV Advanced Airspace management is implemented, however without an automated ASM Support System, because no operational need found for it. - For the military, flight plans have been amended according to notified dynamic airspace changes, but will not adapt to use ADR. ASP (By:01/2022) Not ACR provides only TWR/APP-services, without advanced airspace ACR 0% Applicable management. - Not LFV - 0% Applicable -

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 54 Released Issue ASM Management of Real-Time Airspace Data Timescales: Not yet AOM19.2 0% Initial operational capability: 01/01/2017 planned Full operational capability: 01/01/2022 - No plan yet - ASP (By:01/2022) Not yet LFV - 0% planned -

Full Rolling ASM/ATFCM Process and ASM Information Sharing Timescales: Not yet AOM19.3 0% Initial operational capability: 01/01/2014 planned Full operational capability: 01/01/2022 - No plan yet B2B is available in the LARA system but we are not there yet and there is no - operational need at the moment. ASP (By:01/2022) Not LFV - 0% Applicable -

Management of Pre-defined Airspace Configurations

Not AOM19.4 (Outside Applicability Area) 0% Applicable Timescales: - not applicable - - . - ASP (By:01/2022) Not LFV - 0% Applicable -

Free Route Airspace Timescales: AOM21.2 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 01/01/2022 - Free Route Airspace implemented. 31/10/2013 ASP (By:01/2022) ACR provides only TWR/APP-services, without advanced airspace Not ACR management. 0% Applicable - Borealis FRA Completed Free Route Airspace implemented and Implementation (Part 2) / LFV final acceptance received from Swedish 100% Borealis Free Route 31/10/2013 Transport Agency. Airspace (Part 1) / NEFRA

Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System A-SMGCS Surveillance (former Level 1) AOP04.1 Timescales: 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 01/01/2021 ESSA - Stockholm Arlanda Airport Introduction of MLAT system including equipage of transponders is completed. 31/12/2011

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 55 Released Issue REG (By:12/2010) Regulation is updated and requires all aircraft operating into airports Completed SWE equipped with A-SMGCS Level 1 having equipment in accordance with Transport 100% the requirements of ICAO. Airport Manager is mandated to issue Local 31/07/2011 Agency Safety Regulation applicable to the aerodrome operation. ASP (By:01/2021) Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Completed LFV 100% Level I implemented. 30/04/2010 APO (By:01/2021) Introduction of MLAT system including equipage of transponders to Completed SWEDAVIA support existing SMR is completed. Training and installation of 100% 31/12/2011 equipment are completed.

Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A- SMGCS) Runway Monitoring and Conflict Alerting (RMCA) (former Level 2) AOP04.2 55% Late Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 01/01/2021 ESSA - Stockholm Arlanda Airport A-SMGS level 2 is installed and is under testing/evaluation. Planned to be fully operational 2020-06-30. LFV Proposal: 31/05/2021 A-SMGS level 2 software installed and testing/evaluation is 80% completed. Integration of new MLAT sensor system delayed due to COVID-19 restrictions for the NL and US suppliers to visit on site. New date now planned to be operational 2021-05-31. ASP (By:01/2021) Training and operational procedures planning activities completed and Late ready for implementation. Information received from Swedavia Airports LFV 40% is that technical implementation delayed further until March/April 2021 31/05/2021 due to COVID-19 restrictions for visits on-site. APO (By:01/2021) A-SMGCS Completed A-SMGS level 2 is installed and is under Level 2 SWEDAVIA testing/evaluation. Planned to be fully operational 2020- 100% implementa 31/12/2019 06-30. tion

Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM) Timescales: AOP05 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2004 Full operational capability: 01/01/2021 ESSA - Stockholm Arlanda Airport Validation of CDM at Stockholm Arlanda is completed, will be operational from February 2017. 20/02/2017 ASP (By:01/2021) This Stockholm CDM project is in collaboration between EEC and Completed Stockholm-Arlanda aeronautical platform represented by LFV, LFV 100% Swedavia, Aircraft Operators SAS, Britannia, Skyways and a number of 31/12/2016 Handling Agents. APO (By:01/2021) Implementation of CDM at Stockholm Arlanda is partly, A-CDM Completed SWEDAVIA 100% final operational test are conducted. Optimization 20/02/2017

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 56 Released Issue Time-Based Separation Not AOP10 Timescales: 0% Applicable - not applicable - ESSA - Stockholm Arlanda Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Stockholm Arlanda Airport is not in the applicability area of this objective - REG (By:01/2024) SWE Not Transport - - 0% Applicable Agency - ASP (By:01/2024) The deployment status and planning of this implementation objective Not yet was related to the Pilot Common Project but was taken out from latest planned LFV 0% version of CP. COOPANS has planned an implementation of TBS, but for - the moment not decided when and to wish extent

Initial Airport Operations Plan Timescales: AOP11 0% Late Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/2015 Full Operational Capability: 01/01/2021 ESSA - Stockholm Arlanda Airport Stockholm Arlanda Airport is planning to establish an Initial Airport Operational Plan according 31/12/2021 to SESAR deployment programme 2015.The planning phase of this project is on-going. ASP (By:01/2021) Late LFV - 0% 31/12/2021 APO (By:01/2021) Stockholm Arlanda Airport is planning to establish an Late Initial Airport Operational Plan according to SESAR SWEDAVIA Initial AOP 0% deployment programme 2015.The planning phase of 31/12/2021 this project is on-going.

Improve Runway and Airfield Safety with Conflicting ATC Clearances (CATC) Detection and Conformance Monitoring Alerts for Controllers (CMAC) AOP12 50% Late Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 01/01/2021 ESSA - Stockholm Arlanda Airport - 31/12/2021 ASP (By:01/2021) Not LFV - 0% Applicable - APO (By:01/2021) Enhancement of Late Improve runway and airfield safety with ATC Airport Safety Nets at SWEDAVIA clearances monitoring, according to IR 0% Stockholm Arlanda 31/12/2021 716/2014, will be planned in the near future. Airport

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 57 Released Issue Automated Assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing Not yet AOP13 Timescales: 0% planned Initial operational capability: 01/01/2016 Full operational capability: 01/01/2024 ESSA - Stockholm Arlanda Airport No plan yet. - REG (By:01/2024) SWE Not yet Transport No plan yet. - 0% planned Agency - ASP (By:01/2024) Not LFV No plan yet. 0% Applicable -

Ground-Based Safety Nets Timescales: ATC02.8 81% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2009 Full operational capability: 01/01/2022 - APW is already implemented in Topsky and will be compared to EUROCONTROL Specification on APW. MSAW is already implemented, but is not operationally used. The existing MSAW function will 31/12/2021 be compared to the approved EUROCONTROL Specification on MSAW. Waiting approved Eurocontrol specification on APM as the basis for implementation of APM. ASP (By:01/2022) APW and MSAW are already implemented in Topsky. APM is planned to Ongoing LFV 81% be commissioned during Q4 2021. 31/12/2021 The initiative to implement safety nets at the airports rests with AOP. Not ACR ACR will support and participate when/if the functionality is 0% Applicable implemented. -

Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) for TMAs Timescales: ATC02.9 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2018 Full operational capability: 31/12/2020 - LFV provides STCA (based on EUROCONTROL specifications) to all TMAs that are subject for radar processing based on EUROCAT 2000E. 30/11/2012 STCA is using the Multi-Hypothesis STCA Algorithm functionality All is completed. ASP (By:12/2020) LFV provides STCA (based on EUROCONTROL specifications) Completed ACR to all TMAs that are subject for radar processing based on 100% 30/11/2012 EUROCAT 2000E. LFV provides STCA (based on EUROCONTROL specifications) to all TMAs Completed that are subject for LFV radar processing based on EUROCAT 2000E. 100% 30/11/2012 STCA is using the Multi-Hypothesis STCA Algorithm functionality All is completed.

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 58 Released Issue AMAN Tools and Procedures Timescales: ATC07.1 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 01/01/2020 ESSA - Stockholm Arlanda Airport Basic AMAN functionality is already in place through the MAESTRO sequencing function, which 31/03/2005 is integrated in the EUROCAT2000E. ASP (By:01/2020) Not ACR Basic AMAN functionality is ATCC-related. - 0% Applicable - Basic AMAN functionality is already in place through the Completed LFV MAESTRO sequencing function which is integrated in - 100% 31/03/2005 the TopSky system

Automated Support for Conflict Detection, Resolution Support Information and Conformance Monitoring ATC12.1 Timescales: 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 01/01/2022 - Sweden has implemented a Resolution Support Function and a Conformance Monitoring function (MTCD). 31/03/2005 MTCD has been in full operational use in both Malmö (ESMM) and Stockholm (ESOS) ACCs since the S2K system where commissioned in 2005. ASP (By:01/2022) Not ACR - - 0% Applicable - Completed LFV - - 100% 31/03/2005

Information Exchange with En-route in Support of AMAN Timescales: ATC15.1 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2019 - AMAN is implemented and approved as a part of Eurocat. 31/12/2008 ASP (By:12/2019) AMAN is implemented and in operational use in Completed LFV - 100% Stockholm and Malmö ACC. 31/12/2008 Not Basic AMAN functionality is ATCC-related, ACR performs ACR - 0% Applicable only TWR/APP services. -

Arrival Management Extended to En-route Airspace Timescales: ATC15.2 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 01/01/2024 - - 31/12/2019 ASP (By:01/2024) The implementation of AMA OLDI messages to support Lower Completed LFV extended AMAN operations has been completed in the Airspace 100% 31/12/2019 TopSky system. optimization

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 59 Released Issue Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer ATC17 Timescales: 85% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 01/01/2022 - Automated assistance to controller during coordination and transfer will be implemented 31/12/2021 according to plan. NSA has accepted and communicated proposed changes to ANSP. ASP (By:01/2022) Not The functionality is ATCC-related and therefore outside the scope of ACR 0% Applicable ACR services. - Automated assistance to controller during coordination and transfer is Ongoing implemented. LFV 85% It is now only system bugs preventing the operational use of RAP, RRV, 31/12/2021 CDN, ACP, RJC, and SBY.

Migrate from AFTN to AMHS Timescales: COM10 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/12/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 - AMHS capability (Basic ATSMHS & Extended ATSMHS) and gateway facilities to AFTN are - implemented. ASP (By:12/2018) Not ACR Technical infrastructure is outside the scope of ACR services. 0% Applicable - AMHS capability (Basic ATSMHS & Extended ATSMHS) and gateway Completed LFV 100% facilities to AFTN are implemented. -

Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in En-Route Timescales: COM11.1 63% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 01/01/2022 - LFV plan to replace obsolete technologies (analogue and TDM-based) with VoIP solutions both 31/12/2021 for G/G telephony and the ground part of A/G voice communication. ASP (By:01/2022) LFV plan to replace obsolete technologies (analogue and Ongoing Implementa LFV TDM-based) with VoIP solutions both for G/G telephony 63% tion of VoIP 31/12/2021 and the ground part of A/G voice communication. Not ACR Technical infrastructure is outside the scope of ACR services. 0% Applicable -

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 60 Released Issue Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in Airport/Terminal Timescales: COM11.2 40% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023 - - 31/12/2021 ASP (By:12/2023) Not Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute - 0% Applicable - LFV plan to replace, where suitable, obsolete technologies Ongoing (analogue and TDM-based) with VoIP solutions both for G/G LFV 40% telephony and the ground part of A/G voice communication. LFV 31/12/2021 will implement according to same plan as for OI Not yet ACR - - 0% planned New Pan-European Network Service (NewPENS) Timescales: COM12 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2018 Full operational capability (33 ANSPs): 01/01/2025 - LFV has implemented NewPENS mid 2020. 30/05/2020 ASP (By:01/2025) Not ACR - - 0% Applicable Completed LFV LFV has implemented NewPENS. mid 2020 - 100% 30/05/2020 APO (By:01/2025) Not SWEDAVIA No current plan. - 0% Applicable Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) Timescales: ENV01 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/07/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023 ESGG - Göteborg Landvetter Airport CDA procedures have been introduced and published at Landvetter / Göteborg. 31/10/2010 ASP (By:12/2023) CDA procedures have been introduced and published at Landvetter / Completed LFV 100% Göteborg. 31/10/2010 APO (By:12/2023) CDA procedures have been introduced and published at Landvetter / Completed SWEDAVIA 100% Göteborg. 31/10/2010 Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) Timescales: ENV01 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/07/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023 ESMS - Malmö Airport CDA procedures have been introduced and published at Malmö-Sturup. 31/10/2010 ASP (By:12/2023) Completed LFV CDA procedures have been introduced and published at Malmö-Sturup. 100% 31/10/2010 APO (By:12/2023) Completed SWEDAVIA CDA procedures have been introduced and published at Malmö-Sturup. 100% 31/10/2010

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 61 Released Issue Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) Timescales: ENV01 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/07/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023 ESNU - Umeå Airport CDA procedures have been introduced and published at Umeå. 31/10/2010 ASP (By:12/2023) Completed LFV CDA procedures have been introduced and published at Umeå. 100% 31/10/2010 APO (By:12/2023) Completed SWEDAVIA CDA procedures have been introduced and published at Umeå. 100% 31/10/2010

Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) Timescales: ENV01 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/07/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023 ESSA - Stockholm Arlanda Airport CDA procedures have been introduced and published at Stockholm-Arlanda. 30/09/2009 ASP (By:12/2023) CDA procedures have been introduced and published at Stockholm- Completed LFV 100% Arlanda. 30/09/2009 APO (By:12/2023) CDA procedures have been introduced and published at Stockholm- Completed SWEDAVIA 100% Arlanda. The availability of CDA is reduced during peak hours. 30/09/2009

Collaborative Flight Planning Timescales: FCM03 98% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2000 Full operational capability: 01/01/2022 - Sweden has fulfilled all actions required to support the collaborative flight planning to the extent that it is possible. All remaining not done actions require NM to first upgrade their 31/12/2021 systems to handle IAFP messages for cross border FRA operations, so while LFV is now ready for these steps to be completed we await the required NM changes as a pre-requisite. ASP (By:01/2022) Not ACR will support the collaborative flight planning in the interface with ACR 0% Applicable COOPANS. - Sweden has fulfilled all actions required to support the Ongoing collaborative flight planning to the extent that it is possible. All remaining not done actions require NM to first upgrade their LFV NEFRA 98% systems to handle IAFP messages for cross border FRA 31/12/2021 operations, so while LFV is now ready for these steps to be completed we await the required NM changes as a pre-requisite.

Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) - Phase 2 Timescales: Not yet FCM04.2 0% Initial operational capability: 01/11/2017 planned Full operational capability: 01/01/2022 - No plan yet. - ASP (By:01/2022) Not yet LFV - 0% planned -

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 62 Released Issue Interactive Rolling NOP Timescales: Not yet FCM05 0% Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 planned Full operational capability: 01/01/2022 - No plan yet. - ASP (By:01/2022) Not yet LFV - - 0% planned - APO (By:01/2022) Not SWEDAVIA - - 0% Applicable -

Traffic Complexity Assessment Timescales: FCM06 0% Planned Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 01/01/2022 - Analysis is on-going. 31/12/2021 ASP (By:01/2022) Not ACR Comply only to local (ATS-unit) ATFM management ACR - 0% Applicable and has no data exchange with NM. - Planned LFV - - 0% 31/12/2021

Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (eTOD) Timescales: INF07 85% Late Initial operational capability: 01/11/2014 Full operational capability: 01/01/2019 - Sweden has notified differences to ICAO concerning date of compliance for Area 1, 2 and 4, 31/12/2021 which has been postponed to 31 December 2020. REG (By:01/2019) Sweden has notified differences to ICAO concerning Late SWE date of compliance for Area 1, 2 and 4 which has been Transport - 85% postponed to 31 December 2020. National TOD policy 31/12/2021 Agency and implementation programme is established.

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 63 Released Issue ASP (By:01/2019) A national TOD policy from the regulator did not become available until Late 2nd of November 2017. It has not been possible to plan according to the plan before. The current version of the national TOD policy only includes Area 1. A number of open questions remain regarding how to fulfil the requirements concerning Area 2, 3 and 4, mainly concerning responsibilities. Some initiatives have however started and are ongoing, as mentioned here: LFV has notified the regulator that the LFV part/responsibility LFV 70% when it comes to interfaces between the AIS and a TOD solution will be 31/12/2021 established as a part of the overall ADQ compliant AIM system implementation. Contract is signed with a system provider in August 2017; the system will according to plan be put in operation during 20201. During 2019, the quality assessment of the existing obstacle data base has been initiated, in collaboration with the National Survey (Lantmäteriet). This will continue until 2025.

Terrain data for Area 1 will be published from 2021- Not ACR - - 0% Applicable - APO (By:01/2019) Completed SWEDAVIA - - 100% 31/12/2017

Information Exchanges using the SWIM Yellow TI Profile Timescales: INF08.1 2% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2018 Full operational capability: 01/01/2025 - - 31/12/2024 ASP (By:01/2025) Swedish Ongoing .Upstarted. Meteorologi SMHI will have their Message Swich up and running in cal and 10% November 2019 and will be able to provide TAF, METAR 31/12/2024 Hydrological and SIGMET in IWXXM during q1 2020. Institute Not yet ACR - - 0% planned - Not yet LFV - - 0% planned - MIL (By:01/2025) Not yet Mil. - - 0% planned Authority - APO (By:01/2025) Not yet SWEDAVIA - - 0% planned -

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 64 Released Issue Aircraft Identification Timescales: ITY-ACID 72% Late Entry into force of the Regulation: 13/12/2011 System capability: 02/01/2020 - On going investments related to Surveillance infrastructure that has Mode S capability. 31/12/2021 ASP (By:01/2020) WAM and MSSR-stations with mode-S capability are now covering 90% Late LFV of Sweden FIR with at least two independent sources. LFV two major 80% 31/12/2021 ATCC are using mode-S Aircraft Id for identification and correlation. The initiative to implement ACID at the airports rests with AOP. ACR will Late support and participate when/if the functionality is implemented. ACR 50% Update 2019-11-22: Updates of the SD to Mode-S capabilities has 31/12/2021 started and training is conducted on some of ACRs units. Ensure Quality of Aeronautical Data and Aeronautical Information Timescales: Entry into force of the regulation: 16/02/2010 Article 5(4)(a), Article 5(4)(b) and Article 6 to 13 to be implemented by: ITY-ADQ 78% Late 30/06/2013 Article 4, Article5(1) and Article 5(2), Article 5(3) and Article 5(4)(c) to be implemented by: 30/06/2014 All data requirements implemented by: 30/06/2017 - Planning and implementation in progress. 31/12/2021 REG (By:06/2017) SWE Verification of compliance will be done according to established Late Transport routines when application is submitted or through ongoing oversight 70% 31/12/2021 Agency when applicable. ASP (By:06/2017) ADQ / DK-SE FAB Late LFV Planning and implementation is in progress. Aeronautical Data 66% 31/12/2021 Quality (ADQ) LoA exist between LFV and ACR concerning lowest available vectoring Completed ACR 100% altitudes 31/12/2015 APO (By:06/2017) Swedavia is in a preparatory phase which Late ADQ implementation SWEDAVIA includes cost and workload estimates. Planning 85% Stockholm Arlanda 31/12/2021 will be coordinated with LFV (ANSP). Initial ATC Air-Ground Data Link Services Timescales: ITY-AGDL Entry into force: 06/02/2009 100% Completed ATS unit operational capability: 05/02/2018 Aircraft capability: 05/02/2020 - Swedish Transport Agency ensures that safety is assessed before any change to the existing system and that relevant information is published in AIP. LFV plans to support CPDLC over 16/04/2015 ATN/VDL Mode 2 in accordance with EC Regulation No 29/2009. Transport-type State aircraft will be equipped to comply with Commission Regulation (EC) 29/2009. REG (By:02/2018) Swedish Transport Agency ensures that safety is assessed before any Completed SWE change to the existing system where availability of ATN/VDL2, Security Transport 100% Policy and address management will be assessed. It is dependent on the 16/04/2015 Agency safety case presented by the effected ANSP.

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 65 Released Issue ASP (By:02/2018) LFV plan to support CPDLC over ATN/VDL Mode 2 in accordance with EC Completed LFV 100% Regulation No 29/2009. 16/04/2015 Not ACR ACR has no service above FL 95. - 0% Applicable - MIL (By:01/2019) Mil. Transport-type aircraft entering into service from 1January 2014 have Completed 100% Authority been equipped with data link capabilities. 01/01/2014

8,33 kHz Air-Ground Voice Channel Spacing below FL195 Timescales: Entry into force: 07/12/2012 New and upgraded radio equipment: 17/11/2013 New or upgraded radios on State aircraft: 01/01/2014 ITY-AGVCS2 90% Late Interim target for freq. conversions: 31/12/2014 All radio equipment: 31/12/2017 All frequencies converted: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those notified to EC: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those exempted [Art 9(11)]: 31/12/2020 - Compliance will be ensured with the requirements on 8,33 kHz frequency conversions. 31/12/2021 REG (By:12/2018) SWE Late Compliance will be ensured with the requirements on 8,33 kHz Transport 43% frequency conversions. 31/12/2021 Agency ASP (By:12/2018) Technical infrastructure is outside the scope of ACR services, Completed communication system is responsibility of the airports. ACR is ACR 100% monitoring airport implementation. All concerned (ACR) personnel has 31/12/2018 been trained. Completed LFV - VHF 100% 31/12/2016 MIL (By:12/2020) All aircraft are equipped for 8,33 kHz channel spacing 12-2013. All Completed radios (in all aircraft) will be modified for 8,33 kHz channel spacing Mil. capability by 12-2018. 100% Authority 31/12/2020 Mil. Authority has no ATM Service Provision role and no ATM Regulatory power, so the ASP and REG SLoAs are 'Not Applicable'. APO (By:12/2018) Swedavia is comply to existing legislation meaning full compliant by 31st Completed SWEDAVIA 100% of December 2018. 31/12/2018

Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol (FMTP) Timescales: Entry into force of regulation: 28/06/2007 All EATMN systems put into service after 01/01/09: 01/01/2009 ITY-FMTP 100% Completed All EATMN systems in operation by 20/04/11: 20/04/2011 Transitional arrangements: 31/12/2012 Transitional arrangements when bilaterally agreed between ANSPs: 31/12/2014 - FMTP compliant to (EC) Regulation No. 633/2007 was implemented technically in Topsky 31/12/2018 systems 01/2013. Transition for each adjacent ACC is completed.

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 66 Released Issue ASP (By:12/2014) This objective is not for the time being relevant for the small airports. Not ACR Initiative rests with AOP. ACR will support and participate in the 0% Applicable activities when/if needed. - FMTP compliant to (EC) Regulation No. 633/2007 was implemented Completed technically in Topsky systems 01/2013. All adjacent ACCs except LFV 100% Tampere are now completed. Coordination of tests with Tampere is on- 31/12/2018 going. MIL (By:12/2014) Not Mil. - - 0% Applicable Authority -

Surveillance Performance and Interoperability Timescales: Entry into force of regulation: 13/12/2011 ATS unit operational capability: 12/12/2013 ITY-SPI 87% Late EHS and ADS-B Out in transport-type State aircraft : 07/12/2020 ELS in transport-type State aircraft : 07/12/2020 Ensure training of MIL personnel: 07/12/2020 Retrofit aircraft capability: 07/12/2020 - Safety assessment is conducted and reviewed by regulator, interoperability is ensured and 30/06/2021 training is performed when needed. REG (By:02/2015) SWE Completed Transport Safety assessments reports will be reviewed when received. 100% 30/11/2012 Agency ASP (By:02/2015) Safety assessment is conducted, interoperability is Completed LFV MUS / SUPS 100% ensured and training is performed when needed. 30/11/2012 Safety assessment is conducted and training is performed when Completed ACR 100% needed. 03/02/2015 MIL (By:12/2020) The State aircraft operating as GAT in accordance with IFR rules will be Late Mil. equipped with Mode S enhanced surveillance 01/2019 and ADS-B out 55% Authority 12/2017. Military Authority has no ATM Service Provision role, so the 30/06/2021 ASP SLoAs are Not Applicable.

RNAV 1 in TMA Operations Timescales: NAV03.1 Initial operational capability: 01/01/2001 100% Completed One SID and STAR per instrument RWY, where established: 25/01/2024 All SIDs and STARs per instrument RWY, where established: 06/06/2030 - P-RNAV is implemented in accordance with Swedish regulations for following aerodromes: Stockholm-Arlanda, Halmstad, Göteborg Landvetter, Umeå, Åre-Östersund and Stockholm- 16/12/2015 Skavsta 2011/2012. RNAV for en-route based on DME/DME is implemented. REG (By:06/2030) SWE Completed Transport - - 100% - Agency

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 67 Released Issue ASP (By:06/2030) RNAV for en-route based on GNSS and DME/DME is Lower Completed LFV implemented, carriage required FL95 and above. Airspace 100% 30/04/2005 Initiative for PBN at aerodromes rests with AOP. optimization Completed ACR Initiative for PBN at aerodromes rests with AOP. - 100% 16/12/2015

RNP 1 in TMA Operations Timescales: Start: 07/08/2018 NAV03.2 42% Ongoing All SIDs and STARs per instrument RWY, at PCP airports: 25/01/2024 One SID and STAR per instrument RWY, where established: 25/01/2024 All SIDs and STARs per instrument RWY, where established: 06/06/2030 - - 31/12/2023 REG (By:06/2030) SWE Completed Transport - - 100% 31/12/2020 Agency ASP (By:06/2030) Ongoing ACR - - 30% 31/12/2023 Not TMA operations is AOP responsibility. LFV - 0% Applicable

RNP Approach Procedures to instrument RWY Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/06/2011 Instrument RWY ends without precision approach in EU SES States, at NAV10 Non-PCP airports: 03/12/2020 91% Ongoing Instrument RWY ends served by precision approach (including PCP airports): 25/01/2024 Instrument RWY ends without precision approach in EU SES States, at PCP airports: 25/01/2024 - Procedures for APV/Baro VNAV are published in Swedish AIP. National regulation implemented for APV procedures based on EASA material. This objective contains detailed information about RNP approach procedures implementation at four aerodromes that participate in LSSIP reporting, i.e. Stockholm ESSA, Goteborg ESGG, 25/01/2024 Malmo ESMS and Umea ESNU. LNAV and LNAV/VNAV have already been implemented at all four aerodromes. LPV(APV1) is expected to be implemented at ESGG, ESMS and ESNU by 25.01.2024. LPV(CAT1) is expected to be implemented at ESSA by 31.12.2020 REG (By:01/2024) SWE Completed National regulation implemented for APV procedures Transport - 100% based on EASA material. 30/09/2010 Agency ASP (By:01/2024) Implementation is depending on the aerodrome owners Ongoing LFV initiative and PBN-plan. Procedures for APV/Baro VNAV - 85% 25/01/2024 are published in Swedish AIP. Completed ACR - - 100% 30/04/2015 Ongoing SWEDAVIA - - 55% 25/01/2024

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 68 Released Issue ATS IFR Routes for Rotorcraft Operations

Not NAV12 (Outside Applicability Area) 0% Applicable Timescales: - not applicable - - No current plans to implement this functionality. - REG (By:06/2030) ASP (By:06/2030) Not LFV - - 0% Applicable -

Improve Runway Safety by Preventing Runway Excursions Timescales: SAF11 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/01/2018 - The Swedish Transport Agency has published a national action plan, based on EAPPRE, with recommendations to Aerodrome Operator, Air Navigation Service Provider, Aircraft Operator 31/12/2018 and National Authority. Actions taken by the different actors are reviewed during oversight. REG (By:01/2018) The Swedish Transport Agency has published a national Completed SWE action plan, based on EAPPRE, with recommendations Transport to Aerodrome Operator, Air Navigation Service Provider, - 100% 30/11/2013 Agency Aircraft Operator and National Authority. Actions taken by the different actors are reviewed during oversight. ASP (By:12/2014) Participating in Runway Safety Teams according to LoA Completed LFV - 100% between LFV and AOPs. 20/11/2014 The applicable measures of the Action plan have been Completed ACR - 100% implemented. 20/11/2014 APO (By:12/2014) Mil. Completed - - 100% Authority 30/11/2013 All recommendations according 3.1 & 3.2 have been Completed reviewed, evaluated and implemented as far as practible possible. Appropriate recommendations SWEDAVIA - 100% according 3.3 with Aerodrome Operators responsibility 31/12/2018 (3.3.4; 3.3.5 and 3.3.6) have been considered and implemented.

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 69 Released Issue Additional Objectives for ICAO ASBU Monitoring

Direct Routing Timescales: AOM21.1 100% Completed Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/2015 Full Operational Capability: 31/12/2017 - Free route airspace implemented 31/10/2013. 31/10/2013 ASP (By:12/2017) Free route airspace implemented 31/10/2013. Completed LFV - 100% 31/10/2013

Implement ground based safety nets - Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) - level 2 for en-route operations ATC02.2 Timescales: 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2008 Full operational capability: 31/01/2013 - LFV provides STCA (based on EUROCONTROL specifications) to all TMAs that are subject for radar processing based on EUROCAT 2000E. All is completed. 30/11/2012 National regulations for the use of STCA are in force since 1 January 2005 but the choice of the version and specifications is left to ANSP. ASP (By:01/2013) LFV provides STCA (based on EUROCONTROL Completed ACR specifications) to all TMAs that are subject for radar - 100% 30/11/2012 processing based on EUROCAT 2000E. LFV provides STCA (based on EUROCONTROL Completed LFV specifications) to all TMAs that are subject for radar - 100% 30/11/2012 processing based on EUROCAT 2000E.

Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 Timescales: ATC16 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/03/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2015 - Approved operators are registered in authority registry-system after approved application. LFV has a monitoring system in place and all concerned personnel have been trained. All transport 31/12/2015 A/C are equipped with TCAS 7.1. REG (By:12/2015) Aircraft operators informed via published authority Completed documents and information channels. Information SWE containing applicable regulations and how to make Transport complete airworthiness and operational/training - 100% 31/10/2013 Agency updating and application for ACAS 7.1 Approved operators are registered in authority registry-system after approved application. ASP (By:03/2012) Not The functionality is ATCC-related and therefore outside ACR - 0% Applicable the scope of ACR services. - Monitoring system is in place and all concerned Completed LFV - 100% personnel have been trained. 31/12/2011 MIL (By:12/2015) Mil. Completed All transport A/C are equipped with TCAS 7.1. - 100% Authority 31/12/2015

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 70 Released Issue Implement enhanced tactical flow management services Timescales: FCM01 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/08/2001 Full operational capability: 31/12/2006 - Enhanced tactical flow management service (ETFMS) is implemented except DPI pending 31/10/2009 decision at Stockholm Arlanda Airport regarding CDM implementation ASP (By:07/2014) Not ACR ACR Comply only to local (ATS-unit) ATFM management. - 0% Applicable - Enhanced tactical flow management service (ETFMS) is Completed LFV implemented except DPI pending decision at Stockholm - 100% 31/10/2009 Arlanda Airport regarding CDM implementation

Implementation of ground-ground automated co-ordination processes Timescales: Entry into force of Regulation: 27/07/2006 For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of notification and ITY-COTR initial coordination processes: 27/07/2006 97% Late For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of Revision of Coordination, Abrogation of Coordination, Basic Flight Data and Change to Basic Flight Data: 01/01/2009 To all EATMN systems in operation by 12/2012: 31/12/2012 - FDP and exchange system are in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 1032/2006 Annex I (Part A). ABI, ACT, REV, MAC, BFD, and CFD messages completed. Training on 31/12/2022 additional functionality is always an integral part of implementation. ASP (By:12/2012) This objective is not for the time being relevant for the small airports. Not Initiative rests with AOP. ACR will support and participate in the Applicable activities when/if needed. ACR 2020-12-10 update: Development is actually going in the opposite 0% direction after LFV decision as En-route monopolist provider to - withdraw Topsky components from ACR towers. Will generate higher workload for both ACC and TWR. FDP and exchange system are in accordance with Commission Late Regulation (EC) No 1032/2006 Annex I (Part A). ABI, ACT, REV, MAC, BFD, and CFD messages completed. Training on additional functionality is always an integral part of implementation.

LFV COOPANS TopSky system supports MAC messages but they are 97% 31/12/2022 temporarily disabled due to operational safety concerns with their use. The Eurocontrol OLDI Task Force has been notified that there is a problem with the specification and they have produced guidance material to cover the concerns. Now a TopSky software change is needed before MAC messages can be used - this is on-going. MIL (By:12/2012) Not Mil. Mil. Authority has not ATM Service Provision role, so the ASP SLoAs is 0% Applicable Authority 'Not Applicable'. -

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 71 Released Issue Local Objectives

Note: Local Objectives are addressing solutions that are considered beneficial for specific operating environments, therefore for which a clear widespread commitment has not been expressed yet. They are characterised with no deadline and voluntary applicability area.

Remote Tower Services AOP14 100% Completed Applicability and timescale: Local ESNN - SUNDSVALL-HARNOSAND The ATS- and MET-services at Örnsköldsvik airport, ESNO and Sundsvall airport, ESNN is 04/10/2017 provided from a (remote ATS) center located in Sundsvall.

Remote Tower Services AOP14 100% Completed Applicability and timescale: Local ESNO - ORNSKOLDSVIK The ATS- and MET-services at Örnsköldsvik airport, ESNO and Sundsvall airport, ESNN is 21/04/2015 provided from a (remote ATS) center located in Sundsvall.

Enhanced traffic situational awareness and airport safety nets for the Not yet AOP15 vehicle drivers 0% planned Applicability and timescale: Local ESSA - Stockholm Arlanda Airport No ongoing activity in this objective yet. -

Guidance assistance through airfield ground lighting Not yet AOP16 0% Applicability and timescale: Local planned ESSA - Stockholm Arlanda Airport No ongoing activity in this objective yet. -

Provision/integration of departure planning information to NMOC Not AOP17 % Applicability and timescale: Local Applicable ESSA - Stockholm Arlanda Airport Due to AOP 05. -

Runway Status Lights (RWSL) Not yet AOP18 0% Applicability and timescale: Local planned ESSA - Stockholm Arlanda Airport No activity in this objective yet, -

Multi-Sector Planning En-route - 1P2T ATC18 100% Completed Applicability and timescale: Local - - In which ACCs has the MSP (1P2T configuration) been implemented;¨ ATCC Malmö

- How many sectors are operated with MSP (1P2T configuration); Two -

- Are these sectors continuously operated as 1P2T, or for specific periods of time. Specific periods of time

Sweden has no further plans to implement MSP in other ACCs

Enhanced AMAN-DMAN integration Not yet ATC19 % Applicability and timescale: Local planned - No plans yet in this year report. -

LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 72 Released Issue Enhanced STCA with down-linked parameters via Mode S EHS Not yet ATC20 0% Applicability and timescale: Local planned - We do not have significant data in for enhanced Mode-S (no updated and accepted - requirements for data quality).

Airport Collaborative Environmental Management ENV02 100% Completed Applicability and timescale: Local ESSA - Stockholm Arlanda Airport A number of projects and activities are ongoing taking care of mutual interests in reducing 31/10/2010 environmental impact on neighbouring communities.

Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) ENV03 100% Completed Applicability and timescale: Local ESDF - RONNEBY The majority of the departing aircrafts from Swedish airports (where LFV is the ANSP) gets CCO. It is possible to measure the vertical performance for all Swedish airports (this shows that a very large number of departing aircrafts from Stockholm Arlanda get continuous climb up to at least FL285).

LFV has established CCO procedures in some form at all of their airports (for a long time). CCO is performed for the majority of the departing aircrafts (from airports where LFV is the ANSP). 20/12/2017 In addition LFV has also performed training in Fuel Management for almost all their operational staff (controllers). The training includes information about CCO and examples of various operational techniques to enable CCO.