LSSIP 2020 - SWEDEN LOCAL SINGLE SKY IMPLEMENTATION Level2020 1 - Implementation Overview
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
LSSIP 2020 - SWEDEN LOCAL SINGLE SKY IMPLEMENTATION Level2020 1 - Implementation Overview Document Title LSSIP Year 2020 for Sweden Info Centre Reference 20/12/22/88 Date of Edition 23/03/2021 LSSIP Focal Point Susann LANDQVIST - [email protected] LSSIP Contact Person Igor MARCETIC [email protected] EUROCONTROL / NMD/INF/PAS LSSIP Support Team [email protected] Status Released Intended for EUROCONTROL Stakeholders Available in https://www.eurocontrol.int/service/local-single-sky-implementation- monitoring Reference Documents LSSIP Documents https://www.eurocontrol.int/service/local-single-sky-implementation- monitoring Master Plan Level 3 – Plan https://www.eurocontrol.int/publication/european-atm-master-plan- Edition 2020 implementation-plan-level-3 Master Plan Level 3 – Report https://www.eurocontrol.int/publication/european-atm-master-plan- Year 2020 implementation-report-level-3 European ATM Portal https://www.atmmasterplan.eu/ STATFOR Forecasts https://www.eurocontrol.int/statfor National AIP https://aro.lfv.se/Editorial/View/IAIP FAB Performance Plan https://www.transportstyrelsen.se/sv/luftfart/flygplatser-flygtrafiktjanst- och-luftrum/Flygtrafiktjanst/Prestationsplan/ LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden Released Issue APPROVAL SHEET The following authorities have approved all parts of the LSSIP Year 2020 document and the signatures confirm the correctness of the reported information and reflect the commitment to implement the actions laid down in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 (Implementation View) – Edition 2020. Stakeholder / Name Position Signature Organisation Transportstyrelsen Civil Aviation and Swedish Transport Gunnar LIUNGBERG Maritime Director Agency Ann PERSSON LFV Director General GRIVAS Wilhelm ACR CEO WOHLFAHRT Inspector of Military Military Authorities Anders JANSON Aviation Safety Swedavia -Stockholm Peder GRUNDITZ Managing Director Arlanda Airport LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden Released Issue TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ............................................................................................ 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 12 1. National ATM Environment .......................................................... 13 Geographical Scope .............................................................................................. 13 National Stakeholders .......................................................................................... 15 2. Traffic and Capacity ...................................................................... 22 Evolution of traffic in Sweden ............................................................................. 22 MALMÖ ACC ......................................................................................................... 23 STOCKHOLM ACC .................................................................................................. 30 3. Implementation Projects .............................................................. 35 National projects .................................................................................................. 35 FAB projects .......................................................................................................... 36 Multinational projects .......................................................................................... 37 4. Cooperation activities ................................................................... 40 FAB Co-ordination ................................................................................................ 40 Multinational cooperation initiatives.................................................................. 40 5. Implementation Objectives Progress ............................................ 43 State View: Overall Objective Implementation Progress .................................. 43 Objective Progress per SESAR Essential Operational Changes.......................... 44 ICAO ASBU Implementation Progress ................................................................. 50 Detailed Objectives Implementation progress ................................................... 54 6. Annexes ........................................................................................ 79 A. Specialists involved in the ATM implementation reporting for Sweden .......... 79 B. National stakeholders organisation charts ......................................................... 80 C. Implementation Objectives’ links with other plans ........................................... 85 D. Glossary of abbreviations .................................................................................... 90 LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden Released Issue Executive Summary National ATM Context Member State of: Main national stakeholders: - Transportstyrelsen - the Swedish Transport Agency; - Luftfartsverket (LFV) – the main Swedish ATS Service Provider; - Aviation Capacity Resources AB (ACR) – ATS Service Provider; - Swedavia – Swedish airport company; - The military authorities (Swedish Armed Forces); - The Swedish Accident Investigation Authority (SHK). Main airport covered by LSSIP: There are four airports covered in this LSSIP: Stockholm Arlanda Airport, Göteborg Landvetter Airport, Malmö Airport and Umeå Airport Main national stakeholders: - Transportstyrelsen - the Swedish Transport Agency; - Luftfartsverket (LFV) – the main Swedish ATS Service Provider; - Aviation Capacity Resources AB (ACR) – ATS Service Provider; - Swedavia – Swedish airport company; - The military authorities (Swedish Armed Forces); - The Swedish Accident Investigation Authority (SHK). LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 1 Released Issue Traffic and Capacity Traffic growth in 2019 vs 2020 and Summer Forecast (May to October inclusive) for Sweden. The average en-route delay per flight (minutes per flight) decreased to 0.0. 10% & 32% -57% 2020 2021-2025 The average en-route delay per flight (minutes per flight) Malmo ACC Stockholm ACC 0.16T 0.00 0.11T 0.00 2019 2020 2019 2020 Sweden is part of: 0.00 The DK-SE Functional Airspace Block Number of national projects: 9 Number of FAB projects: 3 Number of multinational projects: 4 LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 2 Released Issue Progress per SESAR Phase The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the SESAR baseline (Pre-SESAR and SESAR1 non- PCP) and the PCP elements. It shows the average implementation progress for all objectives grouped by SESAR Phases, excluding those for which the State is outside the applicability area as defined on a yearly basis in the European ATM Master Plan (Level 3) 2020, i.e. disregarding the declared “NOT APPLICABLE” LSSIP progress status. The SESAR 1 (non-PCP) progress in the graphics below for this State is based on the following objectives: AOP14, AOP15, AOP16, AOP18, ATC02.9, ATC18, ATC20, COM11.2 and NAV12. Pre-SESAR Phase 2000 2030 95% SESAR 1 (PCP only) 2013 2025 41% SESAR 1 (non-PCP) 2013 2030 48% LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 3 Released Issue Progress per SESAR Essential Operational Changes and Phase The figure below shows the progress made so far, per SESAR Essential Operational Changes, in the implementation of the SESAR baseline and the PCP elements. The percentages are calculated as an average, per EOC, of the same objectives as in the previous paragraph. ATM 99 % Interconnected Network 17 % Airport and TMA 98 % performance 0 % 31 % CNS 90 % Infrastructure 40 % and Services 63 % Digital AIM and 82 % MET Services Fully Dynamic 95 % and Optimised 100 % Airspace 60 % Multimodal Mobility and N/A integration of all Airspace Users Trajectory Based 81 % Operations 50 % Virtualisation of Service 100 % Provision 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Pre-SESAR Phase SESAR 1 (non-PCP) SESAR 1 (PCP only) LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 4 Released Issue ICAO ASBUs Progress Implementation The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the ICAO ASBUs Blocks. The overall percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant Objectives contributing to each of the relevant ASBUs; this is a summary of the table explained in Chapter 5.3 – ICAO ASBU Implementation Progress. Block 0 2000 2030 95% Block 1 2009 2030 53% Block 2 2013 2030 Block 3 2018 2025 2% LSSIP Year 2020 Sweden 5 Released Issue ATM Deployment Outlook State Objectives Deployed in 2019 - 2020 - New Pan-European Network Service (NewPENS) COM12 - 100 % progress By 2021 By 2022 By 2023 By 2024+ - Voice over Internet - Implementation of ground- - RNP 1 in TMA Operations - RNP Approach Procedures Protocol (VoIP) in En-Route ground automated co- NAV03.2 - 42 % progress to instrument RWY COM11.1 - 63 % progress ordination processes NAV10 - 91 % progress - Electronic Terrain and ITY-COTR - 97 % progress - Information Exchanges Obstacle Data (eTOD) using the SWIM Yellow TI INF07 - 85 % progress Profile - Voice over Internet INF08.1 - 02 % progress Protocol (VoIP) in Airport/Terminal COM11.2 - 40 % progress - Ensure Quality of Aeronautical Data and Aeronautical Information ITY-ADQ - 78 % progress - Aircraft Identification ITY-ACID - 72 % progress - Collaborative Flight Planning FCM03 - 98 % progress - Surveillance Performance and Interoperability ITY-SPI - 87 % progress - Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer ATC17 - 85 % progress - 8,33 kHz Air-Ground Voice Channel Spacing below FL195 ITY-AGVCS2 - 90 % progress - Traffic Complexity Assessment FCM06 - 00 % progress - Ground-Based Safety Nets ATC02.8