DOCSLIB.ORG

Section B: Activity Information

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Section B: Activity Information ENVIRONMENTAL BASIC ASSESSMENT PROCESS DRAFT BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT PROPOSED BIOMASS CO-FIRING DEMONSTRATION FACILITY AT ARNOT POWER STATION, MPUMALANGA PROVINCE DEA Ref No: 12/12/20/2380 DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW December 2011 Prepared for: Eskom Holdings SOC Limited MegaWatt Park 1 Maxwell Drive Sunninghill 2157 Prepared by: Unit 606, 1410 Eglin office park 14 Eglin road, sunninghill, Gauteng po box 148, sunninghill, 2157 Tel: +27 (0)11 234 6621 Fax: +27 (0)86 684 0547 E-mail: [email protected] www.savannahsa.com (For official use only) File Reference Number: Application Number: Date Received: Basic assessment report in terms of the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, 2010, promulgated in terms of the National Environmental Management Act, 1998 (Act No. 107 of 1998), as amended. Kindly note that: 1. This basic assessment report is a standard report that may be required by a competent authority in terms of the EIA Regulations, 2010 and is meant to streamline applications. Please make sure that it is the report used by the particular competent authority for the activity that is being applied for. 2. The report must be typed within the spaces provided in the form. The size of the spaces provided is not necessarily indicative of the amount of information to be provided. The report is in the form of a table that can extend itself as each space is filled with typing. 3. Where applicable tick the boxes that are applicable in the report. 4. An incomplete report may be returned to the applicant for revision. 5. The use of “not applicable” in the report must be done with circumspection because if it is used in respect of material information that is required by the competent authority for assessing the application, it may result in the rejection of the application as provided for in the regulations. 6. This report must be handed in at offices of the relevant competent authority as determined by each authority. 7. No faxed or e-mailed reports will be accepted. 8. The report must be compiled by an independent environmental assessment practitioner. 9. Unless protected by law, all information in the report will become public information on receipt by the competent authority. Any interested and affected party should be provided with the information contained in this report on request, during any stage of the application process. 10. A competent authority may require that for specified types of activities in defined situations only parts of this report need to be completed. PROPOSED BIOMASS CO-FIRING DEMONSTRATION FACILITY AT ARNOT POWER STATION, MPUMALANGA PROVINCE Draft Basic Assessment Report December 2011 PROJECT DETAILS DEA Reference No. : 12/12/20/2380 Title : Environmental Basic Assessment process: Draft Basic Assessment Report: Proposed Biomass Co-firing Demonstration Facility at Arnot Power Station, Mpumalanga Province Authors : Savannah Environmental Tammy Kruger Jo-Anne Thomas Sub-consultants : uMoya-NILU Consulting MetroGIS Client : Eskom Holdings SOC Limited Report Status : Draft Basic Assessment Report for public review Review Period : 5 December 2011 – 23 January 2012 When used as a reference this report should be cited as: Savannah Environmental (2011) Draft Basic Assessment Report: Proposed establishment of the Eskom Biomass Co-Firing Demonstration Plant at Arnot Power Station, Mpumalanga Province. COPYRIGHT RESERVED This technical report has been produced for Eskom Holdings SOC Limited. The intellectual property contained in this report remains vested in Savannah Environmental and Eskom Holdings SOC Limited. No part of the report may be reproduced in any manner without written permission from Eskom Holdings SOC Limited or Savannah Environmental (Pty) Ltd. Project Details Page i PROPOSED BIOMASS CO-FIRING DEMONSTRATION FACILITY AT ARNOT POWER STATION, MPUMALANGA PROVINCE Draft Basic Assessment Report December 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE PROJECT DETAILS ..................................................................................... i TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................ ii APPENDICES ........................................................................................... iv OVERVIEW OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT .................................................. 1 1.1. Rationale for the Development of the Proposed Facility ............... 4 1.1.1 National and International Climate Change Policy Context .............. 4 1.1.2 Taking opportunities of the carbon market including the CDM ......... 5 1.2. Requirement for an Environmental Impact Assessment Process .. 5 1.3. Details of the Environmental Assessment Practitioner ................. 7 SECTION A: ACTIVITY INFORMATION ...................................................... 9 1. ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION ...................................................................... 9 2. FEASIBLE AND REASONABLE ALTERNATIVES ....................................... 13 3. ACTIVITY POSITION ......................................................................... 15 4. PHYSICAL SIZE OF THE ACTIVITY ...................................................... 16 5. SITE ACCESS ................................................................................... 16 6. SITE OR ROUTE PLAN ....................................................................... 17 7. SITE PHOTOGRAPHS ........................................................................ 17 8. FACILITY ILLUSTRATION ................................................................... 17 9. ACTIVITY MOTIVATION ..................................................................... 18 9(a) Socio-economic value of the activity ............................................. 18 9(b) Need and desirability of the activity .............................................. 18 10. APPLICABLE LEGISLATION, POLICIES AND/OR GUIDELINES ............... 19 11. WASTE, EFFLUENT, EMISSION AND NOISE MANAGEMENT .................. 20 11(a) Solid waste management ......................................................... 20 11(b) Liquid effluent ........................................................................ 22 11(c) Emissions into the atmosphere ................................................. 22 11(d) Generation of noise ................................................................. 23 12. WATER USE .................................................................................. 23 13. ENERGY EFFICIENCY ..................................................................... 23 SECTION B: SITE/AREA/PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ................................ 25 1. GRADIENT OF THE SITE .................................................................... 26 2. LOCATION IN LANDSCAPE ................................................................. 27 3. GROUNDWATER, SOIL AND GEOLOGICAL STABILITY OF THE SITE ......... 27 4. GROUNDCOVER ............................................................................... 28 5. LAND USE CHARACTER OF SURROUNDING AREA ................................... 28 6. CULTURAL/HISTORICAL FEATURES ...................................................... 29 SECTION C: PUBLIC PARTICIPATION ..................................................... 31 1. ADVERTISEMENTS AND NOTICES ....................................................... 31 2. CONTENT OF ADVERTISEMENTS AND NOTICES ................................... 31 3. PLACEMENT OF ADVERTISEMENTS AND NOTICES ................................ 31 Table of Contents Page ii PROPOSED BIOMASS CO-FIRING DEMONSTRATION FACILITY AT ARNOT POWER STATION, MPUMALANGA PROVINCE Draft Basic Assessment Report December 2011 4. DETERMINATION OF APPROPRIATE MEASURES .................................... 32 5. COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT .................................................. 32 6. AUTHORITY PARTICIPATION .............................................................. 33 7. CONSULTATION WITH OTHER STAKEHOLDERS .................................... 33 SECTION D: IMPACT ASSESSMENT ......................................................... 35 1. ISSUES RAISED BY INTERESTED AND AFFECTED PARTIES .................... 35 2. IMPACTS THAT MAY RESULT FROM THE PLANNING, DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, OPERATIONAL, DECOMMISSIONING, AND CLOSURE PHASES AS WELL AS PROPOSED MANAGEMENT OF IDENTIFIED IMPACTS AND PROPOSED MITIGATION MEASURES ......................................................... 35 2.1. IMPACTS THAT MAY RESULT FROM THE PLANNING AND DESIGN PHASE ............................................................................................... 35 2.2. IMPACTS THAT MAY RESULT FROM THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE ...... 35 2.3. IMPACTS THAT MAY RESULT FROM THE OPERATIONAL PHASE ......... 38 2.4. IMPACTS THAT MAY RESULT FROM THE DECOMMISSIONING PHASE 40 3. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ............................................... 42 SECTION E. RECOMMENDATION OF THE PRACTITIONER ..................... 44 Table of Contents Page iii PROPOSED BIOMASS CO-FIRING DEMONSTRATION FACILITY AT ARNOT POWER STATION, MPUMALANGA PROVINCE Draft Basic Assessment Report December 2011 APPENDICES Appendix A: Site Plan(s) Appendix B: Photo Record(s) Appendix C: Facility Illustration(s) Appendix D: Specialist Studies » Appendix D1: Air Quality Study Appendix E: Record of Public Involvement Process » Appendix E1: Proof of Advert Placement » Appendix E2: Proof of Site Notice Placement » Appendix E3: Letters to Stakeholders » Appendix E4: I&AP Database » Appendix E5: Correspondence with Authorities » Appendix E6: Comments and Response Report Appendix F: Draft Environmental
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Biomass Co-Firing Demonstration Facility at Arnot Power Station, Mpumalanga Province
    BIOMASS CO-FIRING DEMONSTRATION FACILITY AT ARNOT POWER STATION BASIC ASSESSMENT PROCESS Savannah Environmental (Pty) Ltd Address: PO Box 148, Sunninghill, 2157 Tel: 011 234 6621 Fax: 086 684 0547 E-mail: [email protected] FOCUS GROUP MEETING NOTES OF STEVE TSHWETE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY MEETING Conducted on Monday, 23 January 2012, Minutes prepared by: Savannah Environmental Please address any comments to Alicia Govender at the above address. Basic Assessment Process: Proposed Biomass Co-Firing Demonstration Facility At Arnot Power Station, Mpumalanga Province BASIC ASSESMENT PROCESS: BIOMASS CO-FIRING DEMONSTRATION FACILITY AT ARNOT POWER STATION MEETING MINUTES: FOCUS GROUP MEETING Venue: Steve Tshwete Local Municipality Date: 23 January 2012 Time: 11h15 – 12h00 MEETING ATTENDEES Name Organisation & Position Alicia Govender (AG) Savannah Environmental Tammy Kruger (TK) Savannah Environmental GG Mokhabela (GM) Steve Tshwete Local Municipality Sibongile Mtsweni (SM) Steve Tshwete Local Municipality Solly Links (SL) Steve Tshwete Local Municipality Eric Ratshibvumo (ER) Steve Tshwete Local Municipality Theuns Bloom (TB) Eskom WELCOME AND INTRODUCTION The project team introduced themselves and a description of the project and proposed activities was given (presentation attached). Theuns Blom added that biofuel to be used for the proposed project will be sourced from the Mpumalanga area. The Biomass Co-Firing Demonstration Facility at Arnot Power Station is a pilot study. A pilot scale study was tested at a test site at the Rosherville MW facility in order for Eskom to get a feel of logistics involved. Eskom now want to try it on a full scale as part of their strategy to see how much biomass can be used to reduce the carbon footprint.
    [Show full text]
  • Written Statement of Mxolisi Mgojo, the Chief Executive Officer Of
    1 PUBLIC ENTERPRISES PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE INQUIRY INTO ESKOM, TRANSNET AND DENEL WRITTEN STATEMENT OF MXOLISI MGOJO, THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF EXXARO RESOURCES LIMITED INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 2 COST-PLUS MINES VERSUS COMMERCIAL MINES .......................................... 5 THE SO-CALLED “PRE-PAYMENT” FOR COAL ................................................. 9 PREJUDICE TO EXXARO’S COST-PLUS MINES AND MAFUBE ..................... 11 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 11 Arnot mine ............................................................................................................. 12 Eskom’s failure to fund land acquisition ................................................................. 12 Non-funding of operational capital at Arnot ............................................................ 14 The termination of Arnot’s CSA .............................................................................. 15 Conclusion of the Arnot matters ............................................................................. 19 Mafube mine.......................................................................................................... 19 Matla mine ............................................................................................................. 21 Non-funding of capital of R1.8 billion for mine 1 ...................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of South African Coal: Market, Investment, and Policy Challenges
    PROGRAM ON ENERGY AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT Working Paper #100 January 2011 THE FUTURE OF SOUTH AFRICAN COAL: MARKET, INVESTMENT, AND POLICY CHALLENGES ANTON EBERHARD FREEMAN SPOGLI INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDIES FREEMAN SPOGLI INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDIES About the Program on Energy and Sustainable Development The Program on Energy and Sustainable Development (PESD) is an international, interdisciplinary program that studies how institutions shape patterns of energy production and use, in turn affecting human welfare and environmental quality. Economic and political incentives and pre-existing legal frameworks and regulatory processes all play crucial roles in determining what technologies and policies are chosen to address current and future energy and environmental challenges. PESD research examines issues including: 1) effective policies for addressing climate change, 2) the role of national oil companies in the world oil market, 3) the emerging global coal market, 4) the world natural gas market with a focus on the impact of unconventional sources, 5) business models for carbon capture and storage, 6) adaptation of wholesale electricity markets to support a low-carbon future, 7) global power sector reform, and 8) how modern energy services can be supplied sustainably to the world’s poorest regions. The Program is part of the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies at Stanford University. PESD gratefully acknowledges substantial core funding from BP and EPRI. Program on Energy and Sustainable Development Encina Hall East, Room E415 Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305-6055 http://pesd.stanford.edu About the Author Anton Eberhard leads the Management Programme in Infrastructure Reform and Regulation at the University of Cape Town Graduate School of Business.
    [Show full text]
  • Acid Deposition in the Eastern Transvaal Highveld
    Acid Deposition in the eastern Transvaal Highveld. Margaret Bohm. University of Cape Town A Dissertation submitted for the Degree of Master of Science in the Department of Environmental and Geographical Science University of Cape Town July 1985. .I l j The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgement of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only. Published by the University of Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. University of Cape Town This is to declare that this dissertation has not been previously submitted for a degree at any other University. ABSTRACT. The Transvaal Highveld has one of the largest potentials for air pollution in South Africa. The area around Witbank and Middleburg in the eastern Transvaal Highveld, is highly industrialized with several coal-fired power stations, burning coal dumps and heavy industries. The pollution levels in this area have been the centre of much dispute in recent years, and yet little emphasis has been placed on the severity of atmospheric deposition despite the fact that acid deposition is a major world-wide environmental concern. This study focusses on the chemistry and severity of atmospheric depositions to the south and south-east of the Witbank-Middleburg Power and Industrial Complex. Bulk depositions were sampled at seven sites during the year August 1982 to August 1983 and rain samples covered five sites for four of the six months of the 1983/84 rainy season.
    [Show full text]
  • Mercury Emissions from South Africa's Coal-Fired Power Stations
    Mercury emissions from South Africa’s coal-fired power stations Belinda L. Garnham*1 and Kristy E. Langerman1 1Eskom Holdings SOC Limited, Megawatt Park, 1Maxwell Drive, Sunninghill, Sandton, [email protected], [email protected] Received: 8 August 2016 - Reviewed: 3 October 2016 - Accepted: 2 November 2016 http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2410-972X/2016/v26n2a8 Abstract Mercury is a persistent and toxic substance that can be bio-accumulated in the food chain. Natural and anthropogenic sources con- tribute to the mercury emitted in the atmosphere. Eskom’s coal-fired power stations in South Africa contributed just under 93% of the total electricity produced in 2015 (Eskom 2016). Trace amounts of mercury can be found in coal, mostly combined with sulphur, and can be released into the atmosphere upon combustion. Coal-fired electricity generation plants are the highest contributors to mer- cury emissions in South Africa. A major factor affecting the amount of mercury emitted into the atmosphere is the type and efficiency of emission abatement equipment at a power station. Eskom employs particulate emission control technology at all its coal-fired power stations, and new power stations will also have sulphur dioxide abatement technology. A co-beneficial reduction of mercury emissions exists as a result of emission control technology. The amount of mercury emitted from each of Eskom’s coal-fired power stations is calculated, based on the amount of coal burnt and the mercury content in the coal. Emission Reduction Factors (ERF’s) from two sources are taken into consideration to reflect the co-benefit received from the emission control technologies at the stations.
    [Show full text]
  • A DIVESTMENT FRAMEWORK for IT GOVERANCE: Case Studies in a South African Mining Industry
    A DIVESTMENT FRAMEWORK FOR IT GOVERANCE: Case Studies in a South African mining industry by Annamaré Wolmarans Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Philosophiae Doctor (INFORMATICS) in the Department of Informatics School of Information Technology in the Faculty of Economics and Management Sciences University of Pretoria Supervisor: Prof. C.J. Kruger Co-supervisor: Dr N. Croft June 2017 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would firstly like to thank my Lord, God Almighty, for providing me with knowledge and the ability to use my gifts to honour and to worship Him in all I do. Secondly, I would like to thank my husband, Jaco, for always supporting me, for always being there when I need him and for taking part in my journey. My supervisors, Professor C.J. Kruger, for his guidance, patience and encouragement during my study, and for contributing to my final understanding of the subject matter presented in this thesis. My co-supervisor, Doctor N. Croft, for his words of encouragement and optimism, and for assisting me in focusing on the important factors in the compilation of this thesis. My friends and family for their ongoing support and interest in the progress of this thesis. Page 1 THESIS SUMMARY Title: A Divestment Framework for IT Governance: Case studies in the South African mining industry Author: Annamaré Wolmarans (28400124) Supervisor: Prof. C.J. Kruger Co-Supervisors: Dr N. Croft Department: Department of Informatics Economic and Management Sciences, University of Pretoria Degree: Ph.D. (Informatics) Keywords: Divestment, Mine Closure, IT Alignment, IT Governance, Closure Framework ABSTRACT Business divestment tends to be the result of a change in the business strategy or due to changing economic circumstances that force a company to either close or demerge business units that are no longer profitable or do not fit the company’s profile.
    [Show full text]
  • Consolidated Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves Report (Cmrr) 0
    Exxaro 2015 consolidated mineral resources and ore reserves report aro 2015 consolidated mineral resources and ore reserves report 2015 CONSOLIDATED MINERAL RESOURCES AND ORE RESERVES REPORT (CMRR) 0 Exxaro 2015 consolidated mineral resources and ore reserves report TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ......................................................................................................................... 1 TABLE OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................. 2 LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................................. 3 1 FOREWORD ................................................................................................................................ 4 2 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 5 3 TENURE ..................................................................................................................................... 12 4 GOVERNANCE .......................................................................................................................... 15 5 COMPETENT PERSONS .......................................................................................................... 16 6 RISK, LIABILITY AND ASSURANCE ....................................................................................... 17 7 GROUP SUMMARY OF RESOURCE
    [Show full text]
  • Company Profile
    Access & Support Scaffolding Marine Scaffolding & Offshore Personnel Supply Entertainment & Event Platforms & Seating Thermal & Sound Insulation & Cladding Corrosion Protection & Industrial Coatings Asbestos Removal Corporate Profile Committed to Performance Excellence www.sgbcape.co.za We are Who We Are History SGB Scaffolding Systems (SGB), a division of Waco Africa in South Africa was formed in 1948 and has operated in the scaffolding business for over half a century. In February 2005, Waco Africa acquired Cape Contracts, who offered insulation, scaffolding and corrosion protection services to its customers for more than fifty years. As part of Waco Africa’s strategy to provide sustainable stakeholder value and meet our customers ever increasing needs for an integrated service, it was decided to combine these insulation and scaffolding offerings. SGB and Cape Contracts integrated into a brand new division of Waco Africa called SGB-Cape. Waco Africa is owned by Waco International and well respected black empowerment partner Bopa Moruo. We are Waco International SGB-Cape is part of Waco International, a focused equipment rental and industrial services business with operations in Africa (South Africa and other sub-Saharan African countries), Australasia (Australia and New Zealand), the United Kingdom and Chile. The Group provides services in the areas of formwork, shoring and scaffolding, insulation, painting and blasting, hydraulic and suspended access platforms, relocatable modular buildings, portable sanitation products and integrated hygiene services. Africa Africa Africa Africa Africa New Zealand New Zealand UK Australia Australia Front cover: Kusile Power Station A1 Grand Prix seating, Durban We offer a one stop service to our clients Access to arches over Moses Mabida Stadium, Durban, for 2010 World Cup What We Do Core Services SGB-Cape is well positioned to offer four lines of business namely; Access Scaffolding, Thermal Insulation and Cladding, Industrial Corrosion Protection and Asbestos Abatement.
    [Show full text]
  • SA Yearbook 10/11: Chapter 8
    ENERGY SOUTH AFRICA YEARBOOK 2010/11 2010/11 ENERGY 8 Energy use in South Africa is characterised Policy and legislation by a high dependence on cheap and abund- The Department of Energy’s Strategic Plan antly available coal. South Africa imports a for 2010/11 to 2012/13 seeks to deliver large amount of crude oil. A limited quantity results along eight strategic objectives: of natural gas is also available. • ensure energy security: create and main- The country also mines uranium, which tain a balance between energy supply is exported, and imports enriched uranium and energy demand, develop strategic for its nuclear power plant, Koeberg. South partnerships, improve coordination in the Africa uses renewable energy in the form of sector and ensure reliable delivery and electricity generated by hydropower, most of logistics which is imported. • achieve universal access and transform Electricity is also generated from other the energy sector: diversify the energy renewable energy sources, mainly biomass mix, improve access and connectivity, and to a lesser extent solar and energy. provide quality and affordable energy, The Government intends to diversify promote the safe use of energy and trans- energy supply and is promoting the use of form the energy sector renewable energy technology as well as • regulate the energy sector: develop ef- other new energy technologies. In addition, fective legislation, policies and guidelines; it aims to improve energy efficiency through- encourage investment in the energy sec- out the economy. tor; and ensure compliance with legisla- The energy sector is critical to South Afri- tion ca’s economy, contributing about 15% to the • provide effective and efficient service country’s gross domestic product (GDP).
    [Show full text]
  • Rope Access Brochure
    Maintenance Repairs Installations Inspections Committed to Performance Excellence www.sgbcaperopeaccess.co.za www.sgbcaperopeaccess.co.za We are Who We Are Expertise and Experience Count SGB-Cape Rope Access is an operating division of SGB-Cape, one of South Africa’s leading service providers of access scaffolding and industrial access based maintenance such as thermal insulation and corrosion protection. Operating under Waco Africa, SGB-Cape is part of Waco International, a leading equipment rental and industrial services business with operations in Africa, Australasia and the United Kingdom. An Affordable Alternative Our specialist rope access services complement the Group’s traditional scaffolding, mobile elevated work platforms and suspended platforms, offering an affordable alternative to access hard-to-reach locations quickly, efficiently and with minimal disruption. We are experienced in many industry sectors including construction, power, oil and gas, banner signage, industrial maintenance and telecommunications. Regardless of the size or complexity of the job, SGB-Cape Rope Access can provide an affordable solution. Waco Africa is a proud Level 3 BBBEE supplier with 52.14% black ownership. Our Growing Footprint With our operational facilities strategically established throughout South Africa, Zambia, Mozambique, Angola, DRC, Ghana and Namibia, we have developed an infrastructure to cost effectively maintain and support operations in these locales. Our South African neighbouring countries are being serviced on a project base. Front cover: Rope access offshore maintenance A1Thermal Grand Prix insulation seating, installation Durban via rope access What We Do Core Services SGB-Cape Rope Access provides customers with the ability to access hard-to-reach locations quickly, efficiently • Maintenance and with minimal disruption.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Coal Power Stations
    Capacity SNo Station Country Location (MW) 51°23′14″N 03°24′16″W / 51.38722°N 1 Aberthaw Power Station Wales 1,560 3.40444°W 21°01′21″N 77°49′25″E / 21.02250°N 2 Amravati Thermal Power Station India 2,700 77.82361°E South 25°56′38″S 29°47′22″E / 25.94389°S 3 Arnot Power Station 2,100 Africa 29.78944°E 31°56′52″N 118°37′49″E / 31.94778°N 4 Banqiao Power Station China 2,070 118.63028°E 32°23′45″S 150°56′57″E / 32.39583°S 5 Bayswater Power Station Australia 2,640 150.94917°E 39°13′08″N 117°55′50″E / 39.21889°N 6 Beijiang Power Station China 2,000 117.93056°E 29°56′37″N 121°48′57″E / 29.94361°N 7 Guodian Beilun Power Station China 5,000 121.81583°E 51°15′59″N 19°19′50″E / 51.26639°N 8 Bełchatów Power Station Poland 5,354 19.33056°E United 36°16′53″N 80°03′37″W / 36.28139°N 9 Belews Creek Power Station 2,160 States 80.06028°W South 36°24′06″N 126°29′30″E / 36.40167°N 10 Boryeong Power Station 4,000 Korea 126.49167°E United 34°07′23″N 84°55′13″W / 34.12306°N 11 Bowen Power Station 3,499 States 84.92028°W 51°25′7″N 14°34′6″E / 51.41861°N 12 Boxberg Power Station Germany 2,575 14.56833°E 27°29′54″N 120°39′44″E / 27.49833°N 13 Cangnan Power Station China 2,000 120.66222°E 30°45′36″N 121°23′59″E / 30.76000°N 14 Caojing Power Station China 2,000 121.39972°E Hong 22°22′32″N 113°55′12″E / 22.37556°N 15 Castle Peak Power Station 4,108 Kong 113.92000°E Chandrapur Super Thermal Power 20°00′24″N 79°17′21″E / 20.00667°N 16 India 2,340 Station 79.28917°E 31°45′25″N 120°58′31″E / 31.75694°N 17 Changshu Power Station China 3,000 120.97528°E 31°57′30″N 119°59′33″E
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae Jo-Anne Thomas
    CURRICULUM VITAE JO-ANNE THOMAS Director: Savannah Environmental (Pty) Ltd Environmental Scientist SKILLS BASE AND CORE COMPETENCIES • Ten (10) years experience in the environmental field • Experienced in project management for a range of projects • Experienced in the identification and assessment of potential negative environmental impacts and benefits through the review and manipulation of data • Experienced in the identification of practical and achievable mitigation and management measures and the development of appropriate management plans • Experienced in the compilation and review of environmental reports in accordance with relevant environmental legislative requirements • Experienced in the formulation of environmental policies, strategies and guidelines • Experienced in undertaking public participation processes for a variety of projects • Experienced in providing strategic environmental advice to a wide variety of clients both in the public and private sectors • Working knowledge of environmental planning processes, policies, regulatory frameworks and legislation • Registered Professional Natural Scientist (Registration No 400024/00) TERTIARY EDUCATION B.Sc Earth Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, 1993 B.Sc Honours in Botany, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, 1994 M.Sc in Botany, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, 1996 EMPLOYMENT HISTORY Nov 2006 – present: Savannah Environmental (Pty) Ltd: Director; Environmental Scientist Oct 1997 – Oct 2005: Bohlweki Environmental (Pty) Ltd:
    [Show full text]