European Foreign Policy Scorecard 2015 About Ecfr

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

European Foreign Policy Scorecard 2015 About Ecfr EUROPEAN FOREIGN POLICY SCORECARD 2015 ABOUT ECFR The European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR) is the first pan-European think-tank. Launched in October 2007, its objective is to conduct research and promote informed debate across Europe on the development of coherent, effective and values-based European foreign policy. ECFR has developed a strategy with three distinctive elements that define its activities: • A pan-European Council. ECFR has brought together a distinguished Council of over two hundred Members – politicians, decision makers, thinkers and business leaders from the EU’s member states and candidate countries – which meets once a year as a full body. Through geographical and thematic task forces, members provide ECFR staff with advice and feedback on policy ideas and contribute to ECFR’s activities within their own countries. The Council is chaired by Martti Ahtisaari and Mabel van Oranje. • A physical presence in the main EU member states. ECFR, uniquely among European think-tanks, has offices in Berlin, London, Madrid, Paris, Rome, Sofia and Warsaw. Our offices are platforms for research, debate, advocacy and communications. • A distinctive research and policy development process. ECFR has brought together a team of distinguished researchers and practitioners from all over Europe to advance its objectives through innovative projects with a pan-European focus. ECFR’s activities include primary research, publication of policy reports, private meetings and public debates, ‘friends of ECFR’ gatherings in EU capitals and outreach to strategic media outlets. ECFR is a registered charity funded by the Open Society Foundations and other generous foundations, individuals and corporate entities. These donors allow us to publish our ideas and advocate for a values- based EU foreign policy. ECFR works in partnership with other think tanks and organisations but does not make grants to individuals or institutions. www.ecfr.eu EUROPEAN FOREIGN POLICY SCORECARD 2015 Copyright of this publication is held by the European Council on Foreign Relations. You may not copy, reproduce, republish or circulate in any way the content from this publication except for your own personal and non-commercial use. Any other use requires the prior written permission of the European Council on Foreign Relations. © ECFR January 2015 Published by the European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR) 35 Old Queen Street London SW1H 9JA [email protected] ISBN: 978-1-910118-25-2 2 EUROPEAN FOREIGN POLICY SCORECARD 2015 EUROPEAN FOREIGN POLICY SCORECARD 2015 STEERING GROUP Vaira Vike-Freiberga (co-chair), Robert Cooper (co-chair), Lluís Bassets, Franziska Brantner, Heather Grabbe, Jean-Marie Guéhenno, Jytte Gutland, István Gyamarti , Jaap de Hoop Scheffer, Wolfgang Ischinger, Gerald Knaus, Nils Muiznieks, Kalypso Nicolaïdis, Christine Ockrent, Albert Rohan, Nicolò Russo Perez, Marietje Schaake, Klaus Scharioth, Aleksander Smolar, Paweł Swieboda, Teija Tiilikainen, Nathalie Tocci, Antonio Vitorino ECFR DIRECTOR Mark Leonard ECFR RESEARCH TEAM Susi Dennison (project leader) Rachel Tausendfreund (project leader/editor) Dina Pardijs (data management coordinator) Kadri Liik, Sophia Pugsley (Russia), Thomas Wright (United States), Chi Kong Chyong, Nigar Goksel, Francisco de Borja Lasheras, Vessela Tcherneva (Wider Europe), Adam Baron, Susi Dennison, Julien Barnes-Dacey, Anthony Dworkin, Ellie Geranmayeh, Andrew Hammond, Daniel Levy, Mattia Toaldo, Nick Witney (Middle East and North Africa), François Godement, Agatha Kratz, Angela Stanzel (China), Richard Gowan (Multilateral Issues and Crisis Management) RESEARCHERS IN MEMBER STATES Arnold Kammel (Austria), Tim Haesebrouck (Belgium), Marin Lessenski (Bulgaria), Hüseyin Silman (Cyprus), Luka Oreskovic (Croatia and Romania), Vladimír Bartovic (Czech Republic), Christine Nissen (Denmark), Andres Kasekamp (Estonia), Teemu Rantanen (Finland), Caroline Maillard (France), Jonas Kassow (Germany), George Tzogopoulos (Greece), Zsuzsanna Végh (Hungary), Ben Tonra (Ireland), Antonietta Cornacchia (Italy), Diana Potjomkina (Latvia), Laurynas Jonavicius (Lithuania), Astrid Spreitzer (Luxembourg) Daniel Mainwaring (Malta), Sanne Raap (Netherlands), Adam Balcer (Poland), Lívia Franco (Portugal), Teodor Gyelník (Slovakia), Sabina Lange (Slovenia), Álvaro Imbernón (Spain), Jan Joel Andersson (Sweden), Catarina Tully (United Kingdom). EUROPEAN FOREIGN POLICY SCORECARD 2015 3 Acknowledgements Above all, the authors would like to thank the Steering Group for their input and advice throughout the process. Special thanks goes to the chairs, Vaira Vike-Freiberga and Robert Cooper, for their enthusiasm and wisdom in guiding this project. Several ECFR staff members contributed to the Scorecard project by giving advice and freeing up time for the Scorecard team. Olaf Boehnke, Piotr Buras, Thomas König, Gustav Gressel, Josef Janning, José Ignacio Torreblanca, and Nick Witney commented on parts of the text. Hans Kundnani was especially hands-on with his editorial advice. Lorenzo Marini designed the excellent new website to go with the Scorecard. Proofreading and fact-checking from Katharina Botel, Justine Doody, and Evanna Folkenfolk was invaluable. Zsófia Tari provided extra research assistance, and Jan Lasocki gave invaluable help with organisation and advocacy. David Carroll’s design has been of constant quality throughout the years. Even though producing this year’s Scorecard was a collective effort, any mistakes in the text remain the responsibility of the authors. 4 EUROPEAN FOREIGN POLICY SCORECARD 2015 Contents Foreword 6 Preface 7 Introduction 8 Chapter 1: Russia 19 Chapter 2: United States 33 Chapter 3: Wider Europe 48 Chapter 4: Middle East and North Africa 64 Chapter 5: Asia and China 79 Chapter 6: Multilateral Issues and Crisis Management 92 Scores and Grades 109 (complete tables) Classification of Member States 114 (complete tables) Abbreviations 120 About the authors 122 EUROPEAN FOREIGN POLICY SCORECARD 2015 5 Foreword The Compagnia di San Paolo is one of the largest independent foundations in Europe and one of the main private funders of research in the fields of EU affairs and international relations. Over the past few years, the Compagnia has progressively consolidated its profile in these fields, signing strategic partnership agreements with institutions such as the German Marshall Fund of the United States and the Istituto Affari Internazionali. Our overall goal is to foster a truly European debate on the main issues that the EU faces and to encourage the emergence of a European political space. It is against this background and as part of the Compagnia’s commitment to support research on the European integration process that we continued the cooperation with the European Council on Foreign Relations on the fifth edition of the European Foreign Policy Scorecard. We highly appreciate this cooperation with ECFR and we sincerely hope that this project will intensify the dialogue among various European stakeholders – both institutional and from civil society – with the goal of strengthening our understanding of Europe’s role as a global player. Piero Gastaldo Secretary General Compagnia di San Paolo 6 EUROPEAN FOREIGN POLICY SCORECARD 2015 Preface This is the fifth edition of the European Foreign Policy Scorecard, a flagship publication for ECFR that evaluates the European Union’s foreign policy performance over the past year. This is the final year of the first post-Lisbon set- up, and our scores track progress over the whole period. As in previous years, we have adjusted some components to reflect the changing situation; continuity is maintained by retaining the same sub-issues in each chapter. We continue to assess the performance of EU actors as a collective. Rather than giving an exhaustive list of all EU policies, we have focused our attention on policies on which there were specific decision points in 2015. European policies for each component are assigned scores for “unity” and “resources” (out of five) and “outcome” (out of ten). The sum of these scores translates into a letter grade for each of the 65 components. Our now-familiar system of identifying member states as “leaders”, “supporters”, or “slackers” has again produced interesting results. There is an unavoidable subjective element in these judgments but we have explained our reasoning in each case in the relevant components. A full description of the methodology of the Scorecard can be found on ECFR’s website at http://www.ecfr.eu/scorecard. Five years’ experience is a good basis on which to assess our own performance and to consider whether we can do better. We plan, therefore, to review our work on the Scorecard in the first half of 2015. Your views on the Scorecard – whether this year’s or over the whole period – would be welcome and useful to us. We look forward to hearing from you. Vaira Vike-Freiberga and Robert Cooper January 2015 EUROPEAN FOREIGN POLICY SCORECARD 2015 7 Introduction In 2014 Europe found itself surrounded by crises. To the east, Russia annexed Crimea and war broke out in eastern Ukraine. The 2013 landmark agreement between Kosovo and Serbia finished 2014 on much less firm ground, with a worsening of the political and economic situation in both countries and in neighbouring Bosnia. To the south, the self-proclaimed Islamic State made stunning advances across Syria and northern Iraq. Civil war continued in Syria, generating a refugee crisis on a horrifying scale, and began in Libya. And the authoritarian regime in Egypt continued
Recommended publications
  • Culture Report Eunic Yearbook 2011 Culture Report Eunic Yearbook 2011
    CULTURE REPORT EUNIC YEARBOOK 2011 CULTURE REPORT EUNIC YEARBOOK 2011 Cultural relations are the glue that holds alliances together. The geopolitics of the 21st century mean we need to see a revival of cultural diplomacy. China and India are already expanding their external cultural policies. Despite Europe‘s huge cultural diversity, the EU has still not developed an adequate cultural strategy for its foreign policy. The establishment of the European External Action Service (EEAS) provides an opportunity to tighten up and co-ordinate the EU‘s existing cultural foreign policy. In this edition of the Culture Report, 30 authors from 20 different countries examine what this all means. Foreword: Crisis and new awakenings by Sebastian Körber 4 CHAPTER 1: EXTERNAL PERSPECTIVES A Brave New World - Globalisation as Europe’s touchstone by Yang Lian 8 All talk and no action by Mai’a K. Davis Cross 20 Art at the heart of mainstream entertainment – an interview by Regis Debray with Frédéric Martel 28 Seizing the day by André Azoulay 38 The cultural revolution by Reem Kassem 45 A gateway to two worlds by Julie Chénot 48 Welcome to the real world by André Lemos 54 A union of double standards by Mahir Namur 60 2 Contents Moving the chairs in the global boardroom by Rajeef Balasubramanyam 64 Europe‘s forgotten fringes by Jurko Prochasko 70 Peeking through the open window by Hela Kamarou 78 CHAPTER 2: EUROPE IN THE WORLD THE WORLD IN EUROPE Now is the time by Robert Palmer 86 Common spaces by Gerhard Sabathil 96 A necessity, not a luxury by Marietje Schaake
    [Show full text]
  • City Space and Urban Identity a Post-9/11 Consciousness in Australian Fiction 2005 to 2011
    City Space and Urban Identity A Post-9/11 Consciousness in Australian Fiction 2005 to 2011 By Lydia Saleh Rofail A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in English. Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences The University of Sydney 2019 Declaration of Originality I affirm that the intellectual content of this thesis is the product of my own work and I certify and warrant to the best of my knowledge that all sources of reference have been duly and fully acknowledged. Lydia Saleh Rofail i Abstract This thesis undertakes a detailed examination of a close corpus of five Australian literary novels published between 2005 and 2011, to assess the political, social, and cultural implications of 9/11 upon an urban Australian identity. My analysis of the literary city will reveal how this identity is trapped between layers of trauma which include haunting historical atrocities and inward nationalism, as well as the contrasting outward pull of global aspirations. Dead Europe by Christos Tsiolkas (2005), The Unknown Terrorist by Richard Flanagan (2006), Underground by Andrew McGahan (2006), Breath by Tim Winton (2008), and Five Bells by Gail Jones (2011) are uniquely varied narratives written in the shadow of 9/11. These novels reconfigure fictional notions of Australian urbanism in order to deal with fears and threats posed by 9/11 and the fallout that followed, where global interests fed into national concerns and discourses within Australia and resonated down to local levels. Adopting an Australia perspective, this thesis contextualises subsequent traumatic and apocalyptic trajectories in relation to urbanism and Australian identity in a post-9/11 world.
    [Show full text]
  • Refugees in Europe, 1919–1959 Iii Refugees in Europe, 1919–1959
    Refugees in Europe, 1919–1959 iii Refugees in Europe, 1919–1959 A Forty Years’ Crisis? Edited by Matthew Frank and Jessica Reinisch Bloomsbury Academic An imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc LONDON • OXFORD • NEW YORK • NEW DELHI • SYDNEY Bloomsbury Academic An imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc 50 Bedford Square 1385 Broadway London New York WC1B 3DP NY 10018 UK USA www.bloomsbury.com BLOOMSBURY and the Diana logo are trademarks of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc First published 2017 © Matthew Frank, Jessica Reinisch and Contributors, 2017 This work is published subject to a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives Licence. You may share this work for non-commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher. No responsibility for loss caused to any individual or organization acting on or refraining from action as a result of the material in this publication can be accepted by Bloomsbury or the authors. British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. ISBN: HB: 978-1-4725-8562-2 ePDF: 978-1-4725-8564-6 eBook: 978-1-4725-8563-9 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A catalog record for this book is available from the Library of Congress. Cover image © LAPI/Roger Viollet/Getty Images Typeset by Deanta Global Publishing Services, Chennai, India To find out more about our authors and books visit www.bloomsbury.com. Here you will find extracts, author interviews, details of forthcoming events and the
    [Show full text]
  • 'What's Haunting Dead Europe?'
    ‘What’s haunting Dead Europe?’ Trauma fiction as resistance to postmodern governmentality MICHAEL VAUGHAN University of Sydney Dead Europe is a novel that has been described as unsettling, disturbing, poisoned, repellent. The text, by most accounts, has the capacity to haunt readers as much as it tracks the diegetic haunting of its protagonist. This paper argues that we can read Dead Europe as an example of trauma fiction, where the painful past is first accessed through its haunting and troped echoes in the present, and that the trauma Tsiolkas writes of is the blood-soaked history of 20th century European history. Indeed, most critics are either implicitly or explicitly in agreement about this first point, whether or not they situate the text specifically within the framework of trauma theory. However, the argument here will be that the purpose of Tsiolkas’ trauma fiction is as resistance to postmodern governmentality, the omnivorous neoliberal democracy beyond the ‘end of history’. In doing so, this paper will draw on Derrida’s concept of hauntology, a product of his reading of the role of Marxism after the fall of the Berlin Wall. Derrida, and arguably Tsiolkas, maintain the usefulness of the spirit of Marx not in the dogmatic belief in his specific theories (such as dialectical materialism) but rather as an ongoing spirit of critical reflexivity, a spectrality which acts as a reminder of the ideological contingency of the present moment. Tsiolkas writes trauma fiction to challenge the totalising discourse of postmodern governmentality, to assert the impossibility of an end to history, and to construct a way of writing and reading fiction ethically which can haunt its readers.
    [Show full text]
  • Yaffa Eliach's Hasidic Tales of the Holocaust
    Navigating the Kingdom of Night: Writing the Holocaust Amy T Matthews Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Creative Writing Discipline of English School of Humanities University of Adelaide April 2007 2 Contents 1. Abstract 3 2. Statement of Originality 5 3. A Brief Outline of the Debate over Fictionalising the Holocaust 6 Literary Risk and Moral Peril 7 The Case of DM Thomas’ The White Hotel 10 Holocaust Endings and the Right to Write 13 4. Fantastic Narrative Strategies: the Use of the Hasidic Tale, Magic Realist Folk Tale and Fable in Holocaust Literature 20 Yaffa Eliach’s Hasidic Tales of the Holocaust 21 Jonathan Safran Foer’s Everything Is Illuminated 28 John Boyne’s The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas 36 5. Contracts with the Reader: Writers Who Break the Reader/Writer Contract 43 Jerzy Kosinski’s The Painted Bird 44 Helen Darville’s The Hand That Signed the Paper 52 6. Addressing the Moral Minefield Self-Reflexively: the Case of Art Spiegelman’s Maus 66 7. Navigating the Kingdom of Night: My Journey as a Writer 75 8. Works Cited for ‘Navigating the Kingdom of Night’ 87 9. Bibliography for End of the Night Girl and ‘Navigating the Kingdom of Night’ 95 3 Abstract End of the Night Girl and ‘Navigating the Kingdom of Night’: End of the Night Girl Nothing seems to go right for Molly – she’s stuck in a dead-end waitressing job, she’s sleeping with a man she doesn’t even like, and she’s just been saddled with a swarm of goldfish and a pregnant stepsister.
    [Show full text]
  • Janine Hauthal
    Journal of the European Association for Studies of Australia, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2019 Europe as Alternative Space in Contemporary Australian Fiction by Carey, Tsiolkas and Jones Janine Hauthal Abstract: This article investigates imaginings of Europe in contemporary Australian fiction in order to explore whether (traveling to) Europe provides alternative points of reference to discourses on nation, belonging, and identity beyond the (settler) postcolonial. The article sets out to compare recent works by Peter Carey, Christos Tsiolkas and Gail Jones who narrate Europe against a wide range of backgrounds, covering diverse diasporic, migratory and expatriate experiences, in order to explore the role of Europe as an alternative space, and of European modernities in particular, in the Australian literary imagination. Concentrating on Jack Maggs (1997), Dead Europe (2005) and A Guide to Berlin (2015), the article has a threefold focus: Firstly, it analyses the representation of European spaces and explores how the three novels draw attention to multiple modernities within and beyond Europe. Secondly, it demonstrates how all three novels, in their own way, reveal European modernities to be haunted by its other, i.e. death, superstition, ghosts, or the occult. Thirdly, these previous findings will be synthesized in order to determine how the three novels relate Europe to Australia. Do they challenge or perpetuate the protagonists’ desire for Europe as an ‘imaginary homeland’? Do references to Europe support the construction of national identity in the works under review, or do these references rather point to the emergence of multiple or transnational identities? Keywords: contemporary Australian literature; fictions of Europe; multiple modernities; Peter Carey; Christos Tsiolkas; Gail Jones Introduction This article sets out to compare works by Peter Carey, Christos Tsiolkas and Gail Jones in order to explore the role of Europe as an alternative space, and of European modernity in particular, in the Australian literary imagination.
    [Show full text]
  • JASAL 2007 Special Edition.Indd
    52 JASAL SPECIAL ISSUE 2007: SPECTRES, SCREENS, SHADOWS, MIRRORS “Blood and land and ghosts:” Haunting Words in Christos Tsiolkas’ Dead Europe CATHERINE PADMORE La Trobe University Ah, do not ghosts prove—even rumours, whispers, stories of ghosts—that the past clings, that we are always going back … ? Graham Swift, Waterland (89) A past that clings and a sense of going back to old haunts are appropriate ways to describe Christos Tsiolkas’ Dead Europe. Released in 2005 and recipient of both the Age fiction book of the year prize and the Melbourne Prize for literature (best writing award), the novel tells the story of Isaac Raftis, a Greek-Australian photographer in his mid-thirties who returns to Europe after a ten-year absence. Europe has changed since his last visit: the Berlin Wall has come down; community demographics have shifted with tides of migration; and American dollars (and child prostitutes) flood the marketplaces. Isaac travels from Australia to Greece, then through Italy, the Czech Republic, Germany, France, Holland and the UK. After wading knee- deep through blood, spew, shit, spit and semen, he returns home a changed man. On his first trip to Europe, while in a Thessaloniki museum, Isaac photographs a photograph of Jewish resistance fighters, and he describes the image thus: “Blood and land and ghosts” (90). This short phrase captures three vital elements of the book and I will explore some of the ways—not always comfortable—that they intertwine in Tsiolkas’ most recent novel. The novel was widely reviewed and often in colourful language: my favourite describes the novel’s world as “a Judeo-Christian devil’s jumping castle submerged in excrement, blood and foul vapours” (Rosenblatt 48).
    [Show full text]
  • Spectral Shadows in Christos Tsiolkas' DEAD EUROPE
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by The University of Sydney: Sydney eScholarship Journals online ‘There Were Phantoms’: Spectral Shadows in Christos Tsiolkas’ DEAD EUROPE LIZ SHEK-NOBLE University of Sydney The return of the dead and the repression of family secrets are central concerns of Christos Tsiolkas’ Dead Europe (2005). The killing of a young Jewish boy, Elias, instigates a narrative of intrafamilial trauma in which his phantom as a psychic double emerges to haunt the descendants of his murderers, Michaelis and Lucia Panagis. Michaelis and Lucia silently transmit this secret to their descendants, Reveka and Isaac, who become, in Esther Rashkin’s sense, ‘living tombs’. It is the contention of this essay that Nicolas Abraham and Maria Torok’s phantom is a psychopathological figure that illuminates the unwitting transmission of family legacies in Dead Europe, these legacies being sexual violence, murder, and anti-Semitism. What the protagonist, Isaac Raftis, realises, is that in the process of being haunted by the phantom- Elias who ‘lies buried yet alive’ (Rashkin, ‘Haunted’ 346) in his psyche, Isaac is powerfully compelled to come to terms with not only his family history but also his own relation to his Greek heritage. It is somewhat serendipitous that in attempting to find answers to ‘the theme of homesickness, of exile and return’ (Tsiolkas 35) by journeying to his mother’s homeland Agrio Dassos, Isaac reawakens the phantom of his family’s unspeakable past. The phantom as a spectral doppelganger of the young Jewish boy, Elias, returns to haunt the Panagis/Raftis family in order to seek retribution for his murder and that of his child, Christos, by Maritha Panagis.
    [Show full text]
  • Review Ivan Cañadas
    Review Ivan Cañadas Christos Tsiolkas. Dead Europe. Milson’s Point, NSW: Vintage Australia / Random House, 2005. Exhuming History: Neo-Conservatism and Christos Tsiolkas’s Dead Europe (2005) Published in 2005, Christos Tsiolkas’s Dead Europe1 stages a narrative intersection of the gothic and realist forms to produce a work of magic realism that avoids the latter’s tendency for the whimsical, in order to delve deeply into the conflicts of history and cultural identity in the age of globalization. In the process, Tsiolkas’s 1 Christos Tsiolkas, Dead Europe. Milson’s Point, NSW: Vintage Australia / Random House, 2005. Subsequent references, incorporated in the text, are to this edition. Copyright © 2007 Ivan Cañadas and Cultural Logic, ISSN 1097-3087 Ivan Cañadas 2 gripping novel-of-ideas reanimates the debate about the so-called “end of history,” and stages this debate within an arena that spans past and present, the personal and the national, from contemporary Australia to wartime Europe — and beyond. Since the publication of his first novel, Loaded (1995),2 Tsiolkas’s work has been committed to the politics of the Left. As I argued some time ago, in an article about Loaded and its film adaptation, Head On (1998), the protagonist’s angst as a young, Greek-Australian homosexual man is significantly due to his internalization of a political experience which had, properly speaking, been that of his parents as working-class migrants.3 That was, literally, the hero’s historical background, given the added local, contemporary context of the economic recession of the early 1990s. In one of the most noted passages in Loaded, Ari ranted about things that were now “history,” a list which included “The [Athens] Polytechnic” — the site of student resistance to the Greek military regime which his parents had opposed (87).
    [Show full text]
  • The Death of Social Europe
    King's Law Journal ISSN: 0961-5768 (Print) 1757-8442 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rklj20 The Death of Social Europe KD Ewing To cite this article: KD Ewing (2015) The Death of Social Europe, King's Law Journal, 26:1, 76-98 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09615768.2015.1035125 Published online: 23 Jun 2015. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 167 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rklj20 Download by: [88.3.106.99] Date: 30 October 2015, At: 09:13 King’s Law Journal, 2015 Vol. 26, No. 1, 76–98, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09615768.2015.1035125 The Death of Social Europe KD Ewing* I. INTRODUCTION We live in counter-revolutionary times. The great social democratic experiment that created Social Europe as a progressive force in global politics appears to be over. The econ- omic crisis has provided an opportunity for a major shift in the balance of economic power between capital and labour, and has created in turn a political crisis for the labour move- ment throughout Europe and beyond. It has also created a crisis of legality, as the oppor- tunity to drive home neo-liberal counter-revolutionary measures is being exploited in apparent violation of the legal obligations of EU member states, and perhaps also EU insti- tutions. This is despite the bold claims by Hayek – and other authors of neo-liberalism – about the singular importance of the ‘greatprinciplesknownastheRuleofLaw’.1 Legality it seems is a casualty of even the most civilized revolutionaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Islamophobia As Anti-Muslim Racism: Racism Without “Races,” Racism Without Racists Fanny Müller-Uri and Benjamin Opratko 116-129
    2 ISJ 3(2) About the Cover Kyung Chyun is an illustrator working in Oakland, California. She attended California College of the Arts in San Francisco for BFA in Illustration. Kyung was born and raised in Seoul until the age of twelve when she immigrated to the states. She considers illustration and art to be her American dream as much as that sounds corny. Honors include 2015 New York's Society of Illustrators scholarship. Her portfolio can be found on kyungchyun.com. 3 About the ISJ The Islamophobia Studies Journal is a bi-annual publication that focuses on the critical analysis of Islamophobia and its multiple manifestations in our contemporary moment. ISJ is an interdisciplinary and multi-lingual academic journal that encourages submissions that theorizes the historical, political, economic, and cultural phenomenon of Islamophobia in rela- tion to the construction, representation, and articulation of “Otherness.” The ISJ is an open scholarly exchange, exploring new approaches, methodologies, and contemporary issues. The ISJ encourages submissions that closely interrogate the ideological, discursive, and epistemological frameworks employed in processes of “Otherness”—the complex social, political, economic, gender, sexual, and religious forces that are intimately linked in the historical production of the modern world from the dominance of the colonial/imperial north to the post-colonial south. At the heart of ISJ is an intellectual and collaborative project between scholars, researchers, and community agencies to recast the production of knowledge about Islamophobia away from a dehumanizing and subordinating framework to an eman- cipatory and liberatory one for all peoples in this far-reaching and unfolding domestic and global process.
    [Show full text]
  • Reviewed by Ken Gelder
    Christos Tsiolkas and the Fiction of Critique: Politics, Obscenity, Celebrity By Andrew McCann Anthem Press, 160pp, £25.00, 2015 ISNB 9781783084043 Reviewed by Ken Gelder HE ‘SINGLE AUTHOR’ ACADEMIC STUDY IS RARE IN LITERARY STUDIES THESE DAYS, AND something of a risk for the critic. Authors are chosen usually because an T academic likes them, or even identifies with them. (Who ever writes a study of an author he or she despises?) But to like an author can set limits to one’s critical capacity: how critical can one be under these conditions? The risk of a single author study is simply that the author has too much concentrated influence. Such studies dutifully build themselves around the author’s corpus, starting with the early stuff and working diligently through to the end: which is more or less what happens in Andrew McCann’s recent book on Christos Tsiolkas even though, as McCann notes, Tsiolkas is only ‘mid-career’. As the sole object of attention, the single author determines the approach and calls almost all the shots. He or she can even provide the terms of engagement: so that, for example, Tsiolkas’s 2005 play about Pasolini’s Salo means that McCann inevitably talks, at length, about Tsiolkas in relation to Pasolini and Salo. In a single author study, author and critic can easily come to reflect each other. It can bind author and critic together, intimately and ideologically, to the extent that readers can sometimes find it difficult to figure out where the one ends and the other begins. One of McCann’s keywords in his study is ‘abjection’: it comes, of course, from Julia Kristeva, but in the sense that McCann uses the term it is lifted straight out of Tsiolkas (from his essay ‘On the Concept of Tolerance’).
    [Show full text]