animals Article The Ethics of Human–Animal Relationships and Public Discourse: A Case Study of Lions Bred for Their Bones Peter Coals 1,2,* , Dawn Burnham 1, Andrew Loveridge 1, David W. Macdonald 1, Michael ’t Sas-Rolfes 2,3, Vivienne L. Williams 1,2 and John A. Vucetich 4,* 1 Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Recanati-Kaplan Centre, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Tubney OX13 5QL, UK;
[email protected] (D.B.);
[email protected] (A.L.);
[email protected] (D.W.M.);
[email protected] (V.L.W.) 2 School of Animal, Plant & Environmental Science, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2000, South Africa;
[email protected] 3 School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QY, UK 4 School of Forest Resources and Environmental Science, Forestry and Wood Products Building, 1400 Townsend Drive, Houghton, MI 49931-1295, USA * Correspondence:
[email protected] (P.C.);
[email protected] (J.A.V.) Received: 17 January 2019; Accepted: 5 February 2019; Published: 8 February 2019 Simple Summary: In South Africa, lions are farmed, and a product of that farming is lion skeletons that form part of an international trade to supply traditional medicine markets in Southeast Asia with felid bones. As a matter of public policy, the practice is a complicated nexus of concerns for entrepreneurial freedom, wildlife conservation, and the fair treatment of animals. We used this case to demonstrate how public discourse about ethically-charged policies can be aided by a technique from the academic field of applied ethics, i.e., formal argument analysis.