Magnetic Properties and Redox State of Impact Glasses: a Review and New Case Studies from Siberia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Magnetic Properties and Redox State of Impact Glasses: a Review and New Case Studies from Siberia geosciences Review Magnetic Properties and Redox State of Impact Glasses: A Review and New Case Studies from Siberia Pierre Rochette 1,* , Natalia S. Bezaeva 2,3, Andrei Kosterov 4 ,Jérôme Gattacceca 1, Victor L. Masaitis 5, Dmitry D. Badyukov 6, Gabriele Giuli 7 , Giovani Orazio Lepore 8 and Pierre Beck 9 1 Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, IRD, Coll. France, INRA, CEREGE, 13545 Aix-en-Provence, France; [email protected] 2 Institute of Geology and Petroleum Technologies, Kazan Federal University, 4/5 Kremlyovskaya Str., 420008 Kazan, Russia; [email protected] 3 Institute of Physics and Technology, Ural Federal University, 19 Mira Str., 620002 Ekaterinburg, Russia 4 St. Petersburg State University, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia; [email protected] 5 A.P. Karpinsky Russian Geological Research Institute (VSEGEI), Sredny prospect 74, 199106 St. Petersburg, Russia; [email protected] 6 V.I. Vernadsky Institute of Geochemistry and Analytical Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, 19 Kosygin str., 119991 Moscow, Russia; [email protected] 7 School of Science and Technology-Geology division, University of Camerino, Via Gentile III da Varano, 62032 Camerino (MC), Italy; [email protected] 8 CNR-IOM-OGG c/o ESRF, 71 Avenue des Martyrs CS 40220, F-38043 Grenoble, France; [email protected] 9 Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, IPAG, UMR5274, 38041 Grenoble, France; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +33-442971562 Received: 26 February 2019; Accepted: 11 May 2019; Published: 15 May 2019 Abstract: High velocity impacts produce melts that solidify as ejected or in-situ glasses. We provide a review of their peculiar magnetic properties, as well as a new detailed study of four glasses from Siberia: El’gygytgyn, Popigai, urengoites, and South-Ural glass (on a total of 24 different craters or strewn-fields). Two types of behavior appear: 1) purely paramagnetic with ferromagnetic impurities at most of the order of 10 ppm; this corresponds to the five tektite strewn-fields (including the new one from Belize), urengoites, and Darwin glass. Oxidation state, based in particular on X-ray spectroscopy, is mostly restricted to Fe2+; 2) variable and up to strong ferromagnetic component, up to the 1 wt % range, mostly due to substituted magnetite often in superparamagnetic state. Accordingly, bulk oxidation state is intermediate between Fe2+ and Fe3+, although metallic iron, hematite, and pyrrhotite are sometimes encountered. Various applications of these magnetic properties are reviewed in the field of paleomagnetism, magnetic anomalies, recognition of glass origin, and formation processes. Keywords: magnetic properties; impact glasses; redox state; Popigai impact glasses; El’gygytgyn impact glasses; urengoites; South-Ural glass 1. Introduction Various types of silicate glass occur in nature [1] and may show exotic iron-bearing inclusions representative of a wide range of redox state [2–4]. Impact generated glasses, having often recorded particularly high pressures and temperatures (>10 GPa and >1700 ◦C; see [5]) on a short time scale (seconds) and endured equally fast quenching, may yield original magnetic properties that we will describe in the present review. Geosciences 2019, 9, 225; doi:10.3390/geosciences9050225 www.mdpi.com/journal/geosciences Geosciences 2019, 9, 225 2 of 23 Geosciences 2019, 9, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 25 Hypervelocity impacts on the Earth surface generate deformation, metamorphism, and melting of the targetHypervelocity rocks (e.g., impacts [5]). on The the meltedEarth surface material generate can be deformation, subsequently metamorphism, fragmented and and /meltingor mixed withof the unmelted target rocks material. (e.g., [5]). It may The melted also be material ejected can outside be subsequently the crater as fragmented liquid masses, and/or injected mixed with in the targetunmelted rocks asmaterial. dikes, orIt may remain also in be the ejected crater outside as a melt the sheet. crater They as liquid may masses, be subsequently injected in altered the target by the impact-inducedrocks as dikes, hydrothermalism. or remain in the crater Depending as a melt on these sheet. modalities, They may andbe subsequently especially on altered cooling by rate, the the rockimpact-induced derived from hydrothermalism. this melted material Depending may be a on pure these glass modalities, (case of fully and especially melted material on cooling rapidly rate, cooled the duringrock ballisticderived ejection,from this like melted tektites), material or a may more be or a less pure cryptocrystalline glass (case of fully material melted mixed material with rapidly unmelted material,cooled during with variable ballistic proportionsejection, like oftektites), glass, or crystals a more grown or less fromcryptocrystalline the melt, and material unmelted mixed material. with unmelted material, with variable proportions of glass, crystals grown from the melt, and unmelted In this review on the magnetic properties of impact glasses, the term ‘impact glass’ will be restricted material. In this review on the magnetic properties of impact glasses, the term ‘impact glass’ will be to impact generated rocks (or large pockets within these rocks) that are mainly in a glassy state at restricted to impact generated rocks (or large pockets within these rocks) that are mainly in a glassy a macroscopic scale. Therefore, we will not treat impactites that contain only small or comminuted state at a macroscopic scale. Therefore, we will not treat impactites that contain only small or fraction of glass or former glass (altered by hydrothermalism or crystallized by slow cooling). These comminuted fraction of glass or former glass (altered by hydrothermalism or crystallized by slow impactites may correspond to suevite or other types of breccia, in particular impact melt dikes often cooling). These impactites may correspond to suevite or other types of breccia, in particular impact usedmelt to dikes perform often paleomagnetic used to perform dating paleomagnetic of impact dating craters. of Inimpact fact, crater a recents. In review fact, a onrecent this review subject on has beenthis performed subject has bybeen Gilder performed et al. [ 6by]. Gilder Therefore, et al. we[6]. will Therefore, mostly we restrict will mostly this review restrict to this impact review glasses to withimpact the above glasses definition, with the above still including definition, afew still cases,including where a few the meltcases, has, where partly-to-totally, the melt has, partly-to- crystallized intotally, a microcrystalline crystallized rock.in a microcrystalline rock. FigureFigure 1. 1. MapMap of tektite tektite fields fields (blue (blue contours: contours: A—australasites;A—australasites; B—moldavites;B—moldavites; C—ivoirites;C—ivoirites; D— D—bediasite-georgiaites;bediasite-georgiaites; E—belizites),E—belizites), craters craters of possible of possible origin origin for tektites for tektites (blue (bluestar: 1 star:—Ries;1—Ries; 2— 2—Bosumtwi;Bosumtwi; 3—Chesapeake3—Chesapeake Bay; Bay; 4—Pantasma),4—Pantasma), other other impact impact glasses glasses without without known known source source crater crater (black(black open open star: star:5 —atacamaites;5—atacamaites;6 6—LDG;—LDG; 7—urengoites; 88—Ural—Ural glass) glass) or or with with known known source source crater crater (black(black filled filled star: star:9 —Popigai;9—Popigai; 1010—El’gygytgyn;—El’gygytgyn; 11—irghizites;—irghizites; 1212—Lonar;—Lonar; 1313—Wabar;—Wabar; 14—Kamil;14—Kamil; 15—Aouelloul;15—Aouelloul; 1616—Lapajarvi;—Lapajarvi; 1717—Janisjarvi;—Janisjarvi; 18—Mistastin;18—Mistastin; 19—Monturaqui;19—Monturaqui; 20—Henbury;20—Henbury; 21— 21—DarwinDarwin glass). glass). TheThe most most peculiar peculiar and and studied studied impactimpact glassesglasses areare tektites. These These correspond correspond to to(almost) (almost) pure pure glassesglasses that that have have been been ejected ejected far far away away from from their their impact impact source source (distance (distance largerlarger thanthan 100100 km and up to 11,000to 11,000 km, e.g., km, [ 7e.g.,]). These [7]). These distal distal materials, materials, besides besides showing showing typical typical splash splash forms dueforms to due their to transport their transport in air or vacuum, have quite distinctive properties. This differentiates them from other in air or vacuum, have quite distinctive properties. This differentiates them from other impact glasses impact glasses that are found near or inside their source crater. Only five tektite (and three that are found near or inside their source crater. Only five tektite (and three microtektite) strewn fields microtektite) strewn fields have been identified on Earth (Figure 1), the largest field by far being the have been identified on Earth (Figure1), the largest field by far being the Australasian one [ 1,8]. The Australasian one [1,8]. The latter is the only confirmed strewn field for which a source crater has not latter is the only confirmed strewn field for which a source crater has not been identified. On the other been identified. On the other hand, impact glasses have been found within or around a significant hand,proportion impact of glasses the >190 have impact been craters found identified within or on around the Earth. a significant A few impact proportion glasses ofhave the been>190 found impact Geosciences 2019, 9, 225 3 of 23 craters identified on the Earth. A few impact glasses have been found unrelated to a source crater but on a rather limited
Recommended publications
  • A Possible Albian Impact Crater at Murshid, Southern Oman
    GeoArabia, Vol. 7, No. 4, 2002 Gulf PetroLink, Bahrain A possible Albian impact crater at Murshid, southern Oman Bruce Levell1, Pascal Richard2 and Folco Hoogendijk2, Petroleum Development Oman ABSTRACT During interpretation of a 3-D seismic survey in southern Oman a solitary, 2.5-km-wide circular basin with a central peak and raised rim was identified in the subsurface 35 km west of the Marmul oil field. The feature is the only one of its kind in the area. The basinal structure is probably of Late Cretaceous (Albian) age and the regional geology strongly suggests that it is neither a volcanic crater nor related to salt-dome tectonics or salt dissolution. It possibly represents a crater formed by a terrestrial impact event and has been named the Murshid crater. This report does not constitute a detailed investigation of the possible impact crater but rather records the 3-D seismic observations and the drilling that has taken place near the structure so far. INTRODUCTION During interpretation of a newly acquired 3-D seismic survey for oil exploration in southern Oman, a solitary 2.5-km-diameter circular basinal feature was identified as a possible impact structure and was named the Murshid crater. It lies 35 km west of the Marmul oil field in the South Oman Salt Basin (Figure 1). The center of the structure is at latitude 18º10’59"N, longitude 54º55’08”E, and it is buried at a depth of approximately 380 m below mean sea level (680 m below the ground surface). The authors are petroleum geologists who felt that the Murshid basinal structure needed reporting to the wider scientific community.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact Glasses from Zhamanshin Crater (USSR)
    80 Earth awl Plauelaty Science Leuers, 78 (1986) 80-88 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam - Printed in The Netherlands IS1 Impact glassesfrom Zhamanshin crater (U.S.S.R.) : chemical composition and discussion of origin Christian Koeberl ’ and Kurt Fredriksson 2 ’ Insritrrre of Geochemisny, Uniuersiry oj Vienna, P.O. Box 73. A-1094 Viema (Arcsrriu) ’ Deparanettr of Mineral Scierrces, Snlithsotriatl Jrlstirurion, Washingron. DC 20560 (U.S.A.) Received October 12, 1985; revised version received February 17, 1986 Three silica-rich zhamanshinites and one irghizite from the Zhamanshin impact crater (northern Aral area, U.S.S.R.) have been analyzed for up to 40 major, minor, and trace elements. All data point to a clear distinction between these impact glasses and other tektites or impact glasses. e.g. from the Australasian strewn field. Halogens are generally enriched in the irghizites and zhamanshinites when compared to normal splash for tektites. with zhamanshinites enriched more than irghizites. The same holds also for the alkali metals and a number of other volatile elements like Sb and As. Nickel and cobalt are enriched in the irghizite sample IO a considerable degree, suggesting meteoritic contamination. This view is also supported by gold and selenium data, but for quantifications.other siderophile elements need to be considered. Chromium is not a valid indicator of meteoritic contamination. because small amounts of ultra-basic igneous material may completely alter the picture. The rare earth elements do show a sedimentary pattern, consistent with two or three different source materials and a variation which is probably mostly due to dilution with silica-rich materials.
    [Show full text]
  • The 3D.Y Knom Example Is /1"<
    t Sixth International Congress on Glass - Washington, D. C., 1962. Fossil Glasses Produced by Inpact of Meteorites, Asteroids 2nd Possibly Comets with the Planet Xarth* A. J. Zzhen :&uon Insticute, Pittsburgh, ?ennsylvania (U. S. A. ) Sunnary / (to be trmslzted izto Frerzh and German) - i in recent thes one of the nost intriging aysteries of geGlogy has ceen the occurrence of aerodgnasicdly-shaped glasses on five continents of the earth. Tnese glasses mder discussion are obviously not of f-d- guritic origin. 3ecent research indicates that these glasses laom as tektites are the result of meteorite, esteroid, or sossibly comet hpact. Lqact glass?s, io generzl, differ Tram volcanic glasses in that they are lo;;.tr in ?,iater zontent, have laver gallium and germiun ccntents, and are rot necessarily ia mgnaticalljr unstable continental areas. These hpac- tites may be divided as follovs: (1)Glasses found in or near terrestrial neteorite craters. These glasses usually contain numerous s-,'nerules 02 nickel-iron, coesite, chunlks of partially melted meteoritic inatter and even stishovite. Shattered or fractured melted mi-nerals such as quarts are comxonly gresent. Aerodpaaic-shaping nay or nay not be present in this t-ne. &m?les are Canyon Diablo and Wabar Crster glasses. (2) Impzct- glasses zssociated with craters uitn no evidence of meteoritic mterial i? the @.ass or surrounding the explosisn site. The 3d.y knom example is /1"< Tnis vork vas supported by Xatiocal A-eroEautizs and Space P.dministretioq,$ 3esezrch Grant NsG-37-6O Supplement 1-62. Page 2 glass associated with AoueUoul Crater in the Western Sahara Desert.
    [Show full text]
  • Shock Papers 2016
    Shock Physics Papers 2016 Abbas, S.H., Jang, J.-K., Lee, J.-R. and Kim, Z. 2016 "Development of an FPGA-based multipoint laser pyroshock measurement system for explosive bolts" Rev. Sci. Instrum. 87 073302 Adushkin, V.V. and Oparin, V.N. 2016 "From the alternating-sign explosion response of rocks to the pendulum waves in stressed geomedia. 4" J. Mining Sci. 52 1-35 Agarwal, G. and Dongare, A.M. 2016 "Shock wave propagation and spall failure in single crystal magnesium at atomic scales" J. Appl. Phys. 119 145901 Ageev, E.I., Kudryashov, S.I., Nikonorov, N.V., Nuryev, R.K., Petrov, A.A., Samokhvalov, A.A. and Veiko, V.P. 2016 "Non-contact ultrasonic acquisition of femtosecond laser-driven ablative Mbar-level shock waves on titanium alloy surface" Appl. Phys. Letts 108 084106 Ageev, E.I., Bychenkov, V.Y., Ionin, A.A., Kudryashov, S.I., Petrov, A.A., Samokhvalov, A.A. and Veiko, V.P. 2016 "Double-pulse femtosecond laser peening of aluminum alloy AA5038: Effect of inter-pulse delay on transient optical plume emission and final surface micro-hardness" Appl. Phys. Letts 109 211902 Agrawal, V., Peralta, P., Li, Y. and Oswald, J. 2016 "A pressure-transferable coarse- grained potential for modeling the shock Hugoniot of polyethylene" J. Chem. Phys. 145 104903 Ahn, D.H., Kim, W., Kang, M., Park, L.J., Lee, S. and Kim, H.S. 2016 "Corrigendum to ‘Plastic deformation and microstructural evolution during the shock consolidation of ultrafine copper powders’" Mater. Sci. Engng A 654 379-380 Akin, M.C., Fratanduono, D.E.
    [Show full text]
  • A Tomography Approach to Investigate Impactite Structure
    3rd International Conference on Tomography of Materials and Structures Lund, Sweden, 26-30 June 2017, ICTMS2017-110 A TOMOGRAPHY APPROACH TO INVESTIGATE IMPACTITE STRUCTURE A. Fedrigo*1,2, K. Marstal1,3, A. Bjorholm Dahl1, M. Lyksborg1, C. Gundlach1, M. Strobl2 & C. Bender Koch4 1Danish Technical University, Denmark 2European Spallation Source ESS ERIC, Sweden 3ERASMUS MC, Netherland 4Copenhagen University, Denmark Keywords: Neutron imaging, image registration, bimodal imaging, computed tomography. Summary: We investigate the structure of impactites from the Wabar iron meteorite impact site in Saudi Arabia. In order to understand the physical and chemical processes involved in the formation of the impactite, we applied a non-destructive investigation approach, which combines X-ray and neutron tomography. This bi-modal imaging method allowed for a better understanding of the impactite’s chemical composition. 1. INTRODUCTION Meteorite impacts have recently been recognised among the most important processes able to modify planetary surfaces. It also happens to be one of the least understood in details. In particular it is a challenge to understand both the extent of impacts and the physical and chemical changes that occur during and following the impact, where materials (e.g., rocks, sand, meteorite fragments, etc.) are subjected to temperatures of several thousands degrees and pressures of several GPa. In addition, most accessible Earth impact areas are highly affected by weathering, which causes extensive secondary chemical alterations. Iron meteorites impact on planetary surfaces cause shock-induced rock deformations that happens both at macroscopic and at microscopic level, e.g. shatter cones (macroscopic) and planar deformation features in quartz (microscopic). Another indicator often correlated to meteoritic impacts is the presence of iridium concentration anomalies [1, 2].
    [Show full text]
  • New Clues from Earth's Most Elusive Impact Crater: Evidence of Reidite in Australasian Tektites from Thailand
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321956231 New clues from Earth's most elusive impact crater: Evidence of reidite in Australasian tektites from Thailand Article in Geology · December 2017 DOI: 10.1130/G39711.1 CITATIONS READS 0 64 4 authors, including: Aaron J. Cavosie Timmons Erickson Curtin University Curtin University 100 PUBLICATIONS 2,285 CITATIONS 27 PUBLICATIONS 159 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE All content following this page was uploaded by Aaron J. Cavosie on 16 March 2018. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. New clues from Earth’s most elusive impact crater: Evidence of reidite in Australasian tektites from Thailand Aaron J. Cavosie1, Nicholas E. Timms1, Timmons M. Erickson2, and Christian Koeberl3,4 1The Institute for Geoscience Research (TIGeR), Department of Applied Geology, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia 2Lunar and Planetary Institute, Universities Space Research Association, Houston, Texas 77058, USA 3Natural History Museum, 1010 Vienna, Austria 4Department of Lithospheric Research, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria ABSTRACT in Australasian tektites from Thailand supports a Australasian tektites are enigmatic drops of siliceous impact melt found in an ~8000 × location for the source crater in Southeast Asia. ~13,000 km strewn field over Southeast Asia and Australia, including sites in both the Indian and Pacific oceans. These tektites formed only 790,000 yr ago from an impact crater estimated MUONG NONG–TYPE TEKTITES to be 40–100 km in diameter; yet remarkably, the young and presumably large structure Muong Nong–type tektites (MN-type, or lay- remains undiscovered.
    [Show full text]
  • Nördlingen 2010: the Ries Crater, the Moon, and the Future of Human Space Exploration, P
    Program and Abstract Volume LPI Contribution No. 1559 The Ries Crater, the Moon, and the Future of Human Space Exploration June 25–27, 2010 Nördlingen, Germany Sponsors Museum für Naturkunde – Leibniz-Institute for Research on Evolution and Biodiversity at the Humboldt University Berlin, Germany Institut für Planetologie, University of Münster, Germany Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt DLR (German Aerospace Center) at Berlin, Germany Institute of Geoscience, University of Freiburg, Germany Lunar and Planetary Institute (LPI), Houston, USA Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Science Foundation), Bonn, Germany Barringer Crater Company, Decatur, USA Meteoritical Society, USA City of Nördlingen, Germany Ries Crater Museum, Nördlingen, Germany Community of Otting, Ries, Germany Märker Cement Factory, Harburg, Germany Local Organization City of Nördlingen Museum für Naturkunde – Leibniz- Institute for Research on Evolution and Biodiversity at the Humboldt University Berlin Ries Crater Museum, Nördlingen Center of Ries Crater and Impact Research (ZERIN), Nördlingen Society Friends of the Ries Crater Museum, Nördlingen Community of Otting, Ries Märker Cement Factory, Harburg Organizing and Program Committee Prof. Dieter Stöffler, Museum für Naturkunde, Berlin Prof. Wolf Uwe Reimold, Museum für Naturkunde, Berlin Dr. Kai Wünnemann, Museum für Naturkunde, Berlin Hermann Faul, First Major of Nördlingen Prof. Thomas Kenkmann, Freiburg Prof. Harald Hiesinger, Münster Prof. Tilman Spohn, DLR, Berlin Dr. Ulrich Köhler, DLR, Berlin Dr. David Kring, LPI, Houston Dr. Axel Wittmann, LPI, Houston Gisela Pösges, Ries Crater Museum, Nördlingen Ralf Barfeld, Chair, Society Friends of the Ries Crater Museum Lunar and Planetary Institute LPI Contribution No. 1559 Compiled in 2010 by LUNAR AND PLANETARY INSTITUTE The Lunar and Planetary Institute is operated by the Universities Space Research Association under a cooperative agreement with the Science Mission Directorate of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
    [Show full text]
  • Soft-Sediment Deformation Structures in Siliciclastic Sediments: an Overview
    Geologos, 2009, 15 (1): 3–55 Soft-sediment deformation structures in siliciclastic sediments: an overview A.J. VAN LOON Institute of Geology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Maków Polnych 16, 61–606 Poznań, Poland; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract Deformations formed in unconsolidated sediments are known as soft-sediment deformation structures. Their nature, the time of their genesis, and the state in which the sediments occured during the formation of soft-sediment deforma- tion structures are responsible for controversies regarding the character of these deformations. A defi nition for soft- sediment deformation structures in siliciclastic sediments is therefore proposed. A wide variety of soft-sediment deformations in sediments, with emphasis on deformations in siliciclastic sediments studied by the present author, are described. Their genesis can be understood only if their sedimentary context is con- sidered, so that attention is also paid to the various deformational processes, which are subdivided here into (1) endo- genic processes resulting in endoturbations; (2) gravity-dominated processes resulting in graviturbations, which can be subdivided further into (2a) astroturbations, (2b) praecipiturbations, (2c) instabiloturbations, (2d) compagoturbations and (2e) inclinaturbations; and (3) exogenic processes resulting in exoturbations, which can be further subdivided into (3a) bioturbations – with subcategories (3a’) phytoturbations, (3a’’) zooturbations and (3a’’’) anthropoturbations – (3b) glaciturbations, (3c) thermoturbations, (3d) hydroturbations, (3e) chemoturbations, and (3f) eoloturbations. This sub- division forms the basis for a new approach towards their classifi cation. It is found that detailed analysis of soft-sediment deformations can increase the insight into aspects that are of im- portance for applied earth-scientifi c research, and that many more underlying data of purely scientifi c interest can, in specifi c cases, be derived from them than previously assumed.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Wabar Meteorite Craters, Saudi Arabia; E
    Lunar and Planetary Science XXVIII 1660.PDF GEOLOGY OF THE WABAR METEORITE CRATERS, SAUDI ARABIA; E. M. Shoemaker1 and J.C. Wynn2, 1U.S. Geological Survey and Lowell Observatory, Flagstaff, AZ 86001, 2U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA 20192. In March of 1995, we were privileged to accompany an expedition sponsored by the Zahid Corporation of Saudi Arabia to the Wabar Craters in the Rub' Al-Khali desert (The Empty Quarter) of the southern Arabian peninsula (at 21°30.2' N latitude and 50°28.4' E longitude). Transport across the sand sheet of the northern Rub' Al-Khali was by Humvees and a 4 x 4 Volvo truck, which carried a backhoe for the purpose of exposing the structure of the crater rims. Although numerous visitors have examined the Wabar meteorite craters over the 62 years since St. John Philby's first report, no detailed investigation of the geology of the craters had been undertaken prior to our expedition. We spent 5 days during the week of March 12 at the craters carrying out a systematic survey of the craters themselves and the surrounding strewn field of impact glass and impact-formed "instant rock." Parts of three craters were exposed at the time of our visit (Fig. 1). Their diameters are estimated at 11, 64, and 116 m. We refer to these as the 11-m, Philby A, and Philby B craters. Contrary to inferences in a number of previous reports (e.g. [1], [2], [3]), the craters have been formed entirely in loose sand of the active Rub' Al- Khali sand sheet.
    [Show full text]
  • Experiment Title: Fe Local Structure in Tektites and Impactites by XANES
    Experiment title: Experiment Fe local structure in tektites and impactites by XANES number: and EXAFS 08-01-251 Beamline: Date of experiment: Date of report: BM-08 from: 8-11-2000 to: 10-11-2000 30-4-2001 Shifts: Local contact(s): Received at ESRF: 6 Pier Lorenzo Solari Names and affiliations of applicants (* indicates experimentalists): Gabriele Giuli* Dip. Scienze della Terra and INFM, Universita’ di Camerino (I) Eleonora Paris * Dip. Scienze della Terra and INFM, Universita’ di Camerino (I) Giovanni Pratesi* Museo di Mineralogia e Litologia, , Universita’ di Firenze (I) Curzio Cipriani Museo di Mineralogia e Litologia, , Universita’ di Firenze (I) Report: This project is focused on the structural study of glasses formed during the impact of asteroids on the earth surface, and in particular on the Fe coordination number and oxidation state. The interest on impact cratering, due to the its importance as a geological process and, partly, to the economic importance of several big impact craters (see Montanary and Koeberl, 2000 for a review), has stimulated a wealth of studies on impact glasses; however, relatively few were devoted to the structural study of these glasses (Korotayeva et al., 1985; Farges et al., 1997; Rossano et al., 1999; Giuli et al., 2000; Giuli et al., 2001). In this study the samples are studied by means of EXAFS and High resolution XANES. To get information on the Fe local environment and oxidation state we collected High-resolution XANES spectra of several Fe compounds with known Fe-coordination number and oxidation state (Fe2+ in 4-, 5-, 6-, and 8-fold coordination and Fe3+ in 6-fold coordination) to be compared with the studied 2 samples.
    [Show full text]
  • © in This Web Service Cambridge University
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-81928-2 - Perilous Planet Earth: Catastrophes and Catastrophism Through the Ages Trevor Palmer Index More information Index Abbas, Asfar and Samar, 206 Alvarez, Walter, 214–18, 222, 223, 226, 234, 235, Abu Ruwash (Egypt), 325, 326 237, 238, 242, 250, 272, 278, 280, 282, 283, acid rain, 204, 222, 232, 233, 239, 336, 342, 365 350 American Association for the Advancement of acquired characteristics, inheritance of, 29, 33, 61, Science, 124 80, 86–8, 91, 93, 167, 173. American Museum of Natural History, 107, 138, Acraman impact structure (Australia), 257 151, 164, 300 actualism, principle of, 19, 46, 77 amino acids, 92, 235 adaptive evolution, 88–91, 97, 102, 147, 148, 151, ammonites, 215, 229, 265, 269 155–7, 169, 178, 181 ammonoids, 133, 265, 269 adaptive mutations, 175 Amor asteroids, 192 Afar region (Ethiopia), hominid fossils from, 108, 1999 AN10 (asteroid), 200 161, 162, 289 Ancient Mysteries (James and Thorpe), 319, 320, Africa–Eurasia collision, 26, 287, 302 347, 348 Agassiz, Louis, 41, 49, 53, 54, 59, 72 Anders, Mark, 233 Ager, Derek, 30 Anderson, David, 352 age of the Earth, 5, 6, 14, 18, 19, 33, 34, 82, 83, Andromedid meteors, 57 172, 173 Angkor complex (Cambodia), 328, 329 Ahrens, Thomas, 208 Annals of Fulda, 353–8 Akkad civilisation, 340 Annals of St. Bertin, 353–6 Akrotiri (Santorini), 131, 132, 335 Annals of Xanten, 353–7 Al’Amarah Crater (Iraq), 348 anoxia, 256, 257, 259–64, 267, 268, 284–6, 315, Alamo Crater (Nevada), 261 366 Alaska earthquake, 211 Antarctica–Australia separation, 269,
    [Show full text]
  • Impact Glasses from Belize Represent Tektites from the Pleistocene
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00155-1 OPEN Impact glasses from Belize represent tektites from the Pleistocene Pantasma impact crater in Nicaragua ✉ Pierre Rochette1 , Pierre Beck2, Martin Bizzarro3, Régis Braucher 1, Jean Cornec4, Vinciane Debaille5, Bertrand Devouard 1, Jérôme Gattacceca1, Fred Jourdan 6, Fabien Moustard1,10, Frédéric Moynier7, Sébastien Nomade 8 & Bruno Reynard 9 Tektites are terrestrial impact-generated glasses that are ejected long distance (up to 11,000 km), share unique characteristics and have a poorly understood formation process. Only four 1234567890():,; tektite strewn-fields are known, and three of them are sourced from known impact craters. Here we show that the recently discovered Pantasma impact crater (14 km diameter) in Nicaragua is the source of an impact glass strewn-field documented in Belize 530 km away. Their cogenesis is documented by coincidental ages, at 804 ± 9 ka, as well as consistent elemental compositions and isotopic ratios. The Belize impact glass share many character- istics with known tektites but also present several peculiar features. We propose that these glasses represent a previously unrecognized tektite strewn-field. These discoveries shed new light on the tektite formation process, which may be more common than previously claimed, as most known Pleistocene >10 km diameter cratering events have generated tektites. 1 Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS, IRD, INRAE, UM 34 CEREGE, Aix-en-Provence, France. 2 IPAG Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Institut de Planétologie et d’Astrophysique de Grenoble, Grenoble, France. 3 Centre for Star and Planet Formation, Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. 4 Geologist, Denver, USA. 5 Laboratoire G-Time, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
    [Show full text]