DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix 11B Freshwater Fish

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix 11B Freshwater Fish A5 Western Transport Corridor Volume 3 – Appendices APPENDIX 11B FRESHWATER FISH Certain freshwater fish are significant nature conservation receptors for the Proposed Scheme for the following reasons: Atlantic salmon Salmo salar, allis shad Alosa alosa, twaite shad A. fallax, river lamprey Lampetra fluviatilis, brook lamprey L. planeri and sea lamprey Petromyzon marinus are listed on Annex II to the Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (the Habitats Directive). A site that is considered to be of significance to any of these species may be designated as a Special Area of Conservation (SAC); The abundance, composition, and age class of freshwater fish, are biological components of the surface water/ecological status of a watercourse classified under The Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC (WFD); The water quality variables of a watercourse enable classification under The Surface Waters (Fishlife) (Classification) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 1997 (as amended), with the classification identifying the species composition most likely to be present or potentially supported; and Some fish are Species of Conservation Concern (SoCC) in Northern Ireland (NI) and Priority Species under the UK post-2010 Biodiversity Framework (former UK Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP)). These include European smelt Osmerus eperlanus, Atlantic salmon, brown trout Salmo trutta, European eel Anguilla anguilla; river lamprey, brook lamprey and sea lamprey. Legislation Some national and European legislative frameworks give legal protection to certain fish species. The most significant of these is Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (the Habitats Directive), which makes provision for the protection of certain habitats and species, listed in Annex II to the directive, through the designation of SAC for sites that will make a significant contribution in the conservation of the habitats/species. The SAC receive full protection under The Conservation (Natural Habitats, etc.) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 1995 (as amended) (the Habitats Regulations). Significant fish species likely to be present within the extents of the scheme include Atlantic salmon, river lamprey, brook lamprey and sea lamprey. The Environment (Northern Ireland) Order 2002 makes provision for ASSIs. Salmonid fish species receive further and specific protection because of the importance of their supporting habitat in NI and the importance of these species as a commercial resource (angling). The Foyle Fisheries Act (Northern Ireland) 1952 (as amended) and the Fisheries Act (Northern Ireland) 1966 (as amended) (the Fisheries Act) provide protection to salmonid spawning habitat and legislate against disturbance of species using this habitat (young and breeding individuals), © Mouchel 2016 A.11B-1 A5 Western Transport Corridor Volume 3 – Appendices obstruction to migration, and the capture, disturbance or obstruction of spawn or fry passage, and capture of salmonid fish by certain methods. The Fisheries Act also provides legislative protection against the taking, disturbing or obstructing the passage of eels. Directive 2000/60/EC, The Water Framework Directive (WFD), implemented in Northern Ireland by The Water Environment (Water Framework Directive) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2003, makes provision for the maintenance and improvement of the ecological status of inland surface waters. The ecological status of a waterbody is determined from three elements (biological, hydro- morphological and chemical/physico-chemical). The abundance, composition, and age class of fish are factors that contribute to the assessment of biological quality of the watercourse. Although the Directive does not place specific requirements upon developers, the Northern Ireland Environment Agency (NIEA), acting as the competent authority, is able to object to proposals or insist on the implementation of mitigation measures where schemes are likely to adversely impact the ecological quality of inland surface waters designated under the Directive. Directive 2006/44/EC on the quality of fresh waters needing protection or improvement in order to support fish life (the Freshwater Fish Directive (consolidated)) (FFD), makes provision for the protection and improvement of the quality of running and standing waters capable of supporting, or would become capable of supporting if pollution was reduced or eliminated, fish species belonging to indigenous species offering natural diversity or species the presence of which is judged to be desirable for water management purposes. The FFD defines a waterbody as either a “Salmonid” or “Cyprinid” waterbody, based upon species assemblages, and prescribes physical and chemical water quality objectives. Although the Directive does not place specific requirements upon developers, the NIEA, acting as the competent authority, is able to object to proposals or insist on the implementation of mitigation measures where schemes are likely to adversely impact the ecological quality of inland surface waters designated under the Directive. Directive 2004/35/EC, The Environmental Liability Directive is implemented in Northern Ireland by The Environmental Liability (Prevention and Remediation) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2009. The Directive establishes a framework for environmental liability based on the “polluter pays” principle, with a view to preventing and remedying environmental damage. Under the terms of the regulations, environmental damage to protected species is that which has a significant adverse effect on the species reaching or maintaining favourable conservation status, and where it is caused by an activity where the operator was at fault or was negligent as to whether such damage would be caused. The Directive defines protected species as those listed in Annex I to the Directive 2009/147/EC on the conservation of wild birds (codified version) (the Birds Directive) and in Annexes II and IV to the Habitats Directive. Finally, and more generally, The Water (Northern Ireland) Order 1999 makes provisions to combat and prevent pollution affecting waterways and groundwater, and therefore has implications for all fish species. © Mouchel 2016 A.11B-2 A5 Western Transport Corridor Volume 3 – Appendices Conservation status Atlantic salmon The Atlantic salmon is of European importance as it is listed in Annexes II and V of the Habitats Directive and Appendix III of the Bern Convention. The species is listed in the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List of Threatened Species and as a Priority Species in the UK, and as a NI SoCC. Atlantic salmon are also considered to be a major commercial species. Brown/sea trout Brown trout and sea trout are the same species, distinguished from each other by whether they are predominantly freshwater populations (brown trout) or anadromous (moving between freshwater and sea water - sea trout) This species is important commercially, considered as possibly the most important single sport species over Europe as a whole (Maitland and Linsell, 2006). This species is listed as a Priority Species in the UK and as a NI SoCC. Lamprey All three lamprey species are of European importance following listing on Annex II of the Habitats Directive and Appendix III of the Bern Convention. The river lamprey is also listed in Annex V of the Habitats Directive. The sea lamprey and river lamprey are both listed as Priority Species in the UK. Maitland (2000) considers all three species of lamprey to be of vulnerable conservation status, with the Red Data Book for Ireland listing all three species as indeterminate (Maitland, 2003). None of the lamprey species are listed as NI Priority Species or SoCC. European smelt European smelt are considered by Maitland and Lyle (1991) to be one of the ten fish species in the British Isles under greatest threat. However, this has not been recognised through national or European legislation. The European smelt is, however, listed as a Priority Species and as a NI SoCC. Shad Both species of shad are of European importance following listing in Annexes II and V of the Habitats Directive and Appendix III of the Bern Convention. The allis and twaite shad are both listed as Priority Species and as a NI Priority Species, and SoCC. Although there is not Red Data Book for fish in Britain, Maitland (2000) considers allis shad to be Critically Endangered and twaite shad to be endangered. The Red Data Book for Ireland, published before the revision of categories lists the allis shad as endangered and twaite shad as vulnerable (IUCN, 1994; Maitland and Ellis, 2003). © Mouchel 2016 A.11B-3 A5 Western Transport Corridor Volume 3 – Appendices European eel The European eel has recently been listed as a Priority Species because of population declines across much of Western Europe. Scientific research by the Joint European Inland Fisheries Advisory Commission (EIFAC) and International Council of the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) Working Group on Eels in 2006 supported this, identifying a decline in most of its distribution and that it is now outside safe biological limits (IUCN, 2008). The species is not, however, listed as a NI SoCC. Other species Species that do not receive specific legal protection but which may be present within the study area are components of the freshwater fish assemblage. These include the following which are known to occur in the study area: Flounder Platichthys flesus; Stone loach Barbatula
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Edna Assay Development
    Environmental DNA assays available for species detection via qPCR analysis at the U.S.D.A Forest Service National Genomics Center for Wildlife and Fish Conservation (NGC). Asterisks indicate the assay was designed at the NGC. This list was last updated in June 2021 and is subject to change. Please contact [email protected] with questions. Family Species Common name Ready for use? Mustelidae Martes americana, Martes caurina American and Pacific marten* Y Castoridae Castor canadensis American beaver Y Ranidae Lithobates catesbeianus American bullfrog Y Cinclidae Cinclus mexicanus American dipper* N Anguillidae Anguilla rostrata American eel Y Soricidae Sorex palustris American water shrew* N Salmonidae Oncorhynchus clarkii ssp Any cutthroat trout* N Petromyzontidae Lampetra spp. Any Lampetra* Y Salmonidae Salmonidae Any salmonid* Y Cottidae Cottidae Any sculpin* Y Salmonidae Thymallus arcticus Arctic grayling* Y Cyrenidae Corbicula fluminea Asian clam* N Salmonidae Salmo salar Atlantic Salmon Y Lymnaeidae Radix auricularia Big-eared radix* N Cyprinidae Mylopharyngodon piceus Black carp N Ictaluridae Ameiurus melas Black Bullhead* N Catostomidae Cycleptus elongatus Blue Sucker* N Cichlidae Oreochromis aureus Blue tilapia* N Catostomidae Catostomus discobolus Bluehead sucker* N Catostomidae Catostomus virescens Bluehead sucker* Y Felidae Lynx rufus Bobcat* Y Hylidae Pseudocris maculata Boreal chorus frog N Hydrocharitaceae Egeria densa Brazilian elodea N Salmonidae Salvelinus fontinalis Brook trout* Y Colubridae Boiga irregularis Brown tree snake*
    [Show full text]
  • Quantitative PCR Assays for Detecting Loach Minnow (Rhinichthys Cobitis) and Spikedace (Meda Fulgida) in the Southwestern United States
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Quantitative PCR Assays for Detecting Loach Minnow (Rhinichthys cobitis) and Spikedace (Meda fulgida) in the Southwestern United States Joseph C. Dysthe1*, Kellie J. Carim1, Yvette M. Paroz2, Kevin S. McKelvey1, Michael K. Young1, Michael K. Schwartz1 1 United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, National Genomics Center for Wildlife and Fish Conservation, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Missoula, MT, United States of America, 2 United States a11111 Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southwestern Region, Albuquerque, NM, United States of America * [email protected] Abstract OPEN ACCESS Loach minnow (Rhinichthys cobitis) and spikedace (Meda fulgida) are legally protected Citation: Dysthe JC, Carim KJ, Paroz YM, McKelvey with the status of Endangered under the U.S. Endangered Species Act and are endemic to KS, Young MK, Schwartz MK (2016) Quantitative the Gila River basin of Arizona and New Mexico. Efficient and sensitive methods for moni- PCR Assays for Detecting Loach Minnow ’ (Rhinichthys cobitis) and Spikedace (Meda fulgida)in toring these species distributions are critical for prioritizing conservation efforts. We devel- the Southwestern United States. PLoS ONE 11(9): oped quantitative PCR assays for detecting loach minnow and spikedace DNA in e0162200. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0162200 environmental samples. Each assay reliably detected low concentrations of target DNA Editor: Michael Hofreiter, University of York, UNITED without detection of non-target species, including other cyprinid fishes with which they co- KINGDOM occur. Received: April 27, 2016 Accepted: August 18, 2016 Published: September 1, 2016 Copyright: This is an open access article, free of all Introduction copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used Loach minnow (Rhinichthys cobitis) and spikedace (Meda fulgida) are cyprinid fishes that were by anyone for any lawful purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife
    United States Department of the Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2321 West Royal Palm Road, Suite 103 Phoenix, Arizona 85021 Telephone: (602) 242-0210 FAX: (602) 242-2513 AESO/SE 02-21-00-F-0029 October 23, 2003 Memorandum To: Field Manager, Tucson Field Office, Bureau of Land Management, Tucson, Arizona From: Field Supervisor Subject: Biological Opinion: Livestock Grazing on 18 Allotments Along the Middle Gila River Ecosystem This biological opinion responds to your request for consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) pursuant to section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S. C. 1531- 1544), as amended (ESA). Your original request was dated November 24, 2000, and received in our office November 27, 2000. Due to changes made in the proposed action, your office resubmitted the biological evaluation on March 12, 2001. Thus, formal consultation commenced on that date. At issue are impacts that may result from the Tucson Field Office’s grazing program in portions of the Middle Gila River Ecosystem, Gila and Pinal counties, Arizona. These impacts may affect the following listed species: southwestern willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus); cactus ferruginous pygmy-owl (Glaucidium brasilianum cactorum); lesser long-nosed bat (Leptonycteris curasoae yerbabuenae); spikedace (Meda fulgida); and loach minnow (Tiaroga cobitis), and critical habitat designated for the spikedace and loach minnow. The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) requested our concurrence that the proposed action may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect, the Arizona hedgehog cactus (Echinocereus triglochidiatus var. arizonicus) and the bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus). We concur with the BLM’s determinations for these species.
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Species
    FEATURE: ENDANGERED SPECIES Conservation Status of Imperiled North American Freshwater and Diadromous Fishes ABSTRACT: This is the third compilation of imperiled (i.e., endangered, threatened, vulnerable) plus extinct freshwater and diadromous fishes of North America prepared by the American Fisheries Society’s Endangered Species Committee. Since the last revision in 1989, imperilment of inland fishes has increased substantially. This list includes 700 extant taxa representing 133 genera and 36 families, a 92% increase over the 364 listed in 1989. The increase reflects the addition of distinct populations, previously non-imperiled fishes, and recently described or discovered taxa. Approximately 39% of described fish species of the continent are imperiled. There are 230 vulnerable, 190 threatened, and 280 endangered extant taxa, and 61 taxa presumed extinct or extirpated from nature. Of those that were imperiled in 1989, most (89%) are the same or worse in conservation status; only 6% have improved in status, and 5% were delisted for various reasons. Habitat degradation and nonindigenous species are the main threats to at-risk fishes, many of which are restricted to small ranges. Documenting the diversity and status of rare fishes is a critical step in identifying and implementing appropriate actions necessary for their protection and management. Howard L. Jelks, Frank McCormick, Stephen J. Walsh, Joseph S. Nelson, Noel M. Burkhead, Steven P. Platania, Salvador Contreras-Balderas, Brady A. Porter, Edmundo Díaz-Pardo, Claude B. Renaud, Dean A. Hendrickson, Juan Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, John Lyons, Eric B. Taylor, and Nicholas E. Mandrak, Melvin L. Warren, Jr. Jelks, Walsh, and Burkhead are research McCormick is a biologist with the biologists with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • ECOLOGY of NORTH AMERICAN FRESHWATER FISHES
    ECOLOGY of NORTH AMERICAN FRESHWATER FISHES Tables STEPHEN T. ROSS University of California Press Berkeley Los Angeles London © 2013 by The Regents of the University of California ISBN 978-0-520-24945-5 uucp-ross-book-color.indbcp-ross-book-color.indb 1 44/5/13/5/13 88:34:34 AAMM uucp-ross-book-color.indbcp-ross-book-color.indb 2 44/5/13/5/13 88:34:34 AAMM TABLE 1.1 Families Composing 95% of North American Freshwater Fish Species Ranked by the Number of Native Species Number Cumulative Family of species percent Cyprinidae 297 28 Percidae 186 45 Catostomidae 71 51 Poeciliidae 69 58 Ictaluridae 46 62 Goodeidae 45 66 Atherinopsidae 39 70 Salmonidae 38 74 Cyprinodontidae 35 77 Fundulidae 34 80 Centrarchidae 31 83 Cottidae 30 86 Petromyzontidae 21 88 Cichlidae 16 89 Clupeidae 10 90 Eleotridae 10 91 Acipenseridae 8 92 Osmeridae 6 92 Elassomatidae 6 93 Gobiidae 6 93 Amblyopsidae 6 94 Pimelodidae 6 94 Gasterosteidae 5 95 source: Compiled primarily from Mayden (1992), Nelson et al. (2004), and Miller and Norris (2005). uucp-ross-book-color.indbcp-ross-book-color.indb 3 44/5/13/5/13 88:34:34 AAMM TABLE 3.1 Biogeographic Relationships of Species from a Sample of Fishes from the Ouachita River, Arkansas, at the Confl uence with the Little Missouri River (Ross, pers. observ.) Origin/ Pre- Pleistocene Taxa distribution Source Highland Stoneroller, Campostoma spadiceum 2 Mayden 1987a; Blum et al. 2008; Cashner et al. 2010 Blacktail Shiner, Cyprinella venusta 3 Mayden 1987a Steelcolor Shiner, Cyprinella whipplei 1 Mayden 1987a Redfi n Shiner, Lythrurus umbratilis 4 Mayden 1987a Bigeye Shiner, Notropis boops 1 Wiley and Mayden 1985; Mayden 1987a Bullhead Minnow, Pimephales vigilax 4 Mayden 1987a Mountain Madtom, Noturus eleutherus 2a Mayden 1985, 1987a Creole Darter, Etheostoma collettei 2a Mayden 1985 Orangebelly Darter, Etheostoma radiosum 2a Page 1983; Mayden 1985, 1987a Speckled Darter, Etheostoma stigmaeum 3 Page 1983; Simon 1997 Redspot Darter, Etheostoma artesiae 3 Mayden 1985; Piller et al.
    [Show full text]
  • An Bord Pleanala Inspector's Report PL05.PA0040 Development: 49 No
    An Bord Pleanala Inspector’s Report PL05.PA0040 Development: 49 no. wind turbines, 2no. meteorological mast 2no. electrical 110kv substations 9 no. borrow pits and all associated works at Meenbog and other townlands, County Donegal APPLICATION Applicant: Planree Ltd Local Authority: Donegal County Council Application Type: Strategic Infrastructure Case (S 37 E) Oral Hearing None Transboundary Consultation: Yes – Northern Ireland Prescribed Bodies Dep. of Environment, Community and Local Gov. Dep. Commerce, Energy and Natural Resources Dep. of Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht Dep. of Transport, Tourism and Sport Environmental Protection Agency Irish water Inland Fisheries Ireland National Roads Authority The Heritage Council The Arts Council Health Service Executive Commission for Energy Regulation An Taisce Failte Ireland Irish Aviation Authority Loughs Agency Northern Ireland Planning Service Submissions: 251 parties Inspector: Suzanne Kehely Date of Inspection: 13-15th April and 24-26th November 2015 APPENDIX Report by Board appointed consultant ecologist _________________________________________________________________________ PL05.PA0040 An Bord Pleanala 1 1 INTRODUCTION This is an application for permission for a wind farm under S. 37E (1) of the Planning and Development (Strategic Infrastructure) Act, 2006. The application is for development classified within Schedule 7 principally being: ‘An installation for the harnessing of wind power for energy production…. having a total output greater than 100 megawatts.’ Pursuant to Section 37E(3) and given that the proposed development is likely to have significant effects on the environment of a transboundary state, that being Northern Ireland, the Department of Environment, Northern Ireland was invited to make observations in addition to a list of prescribed authorities. A comprehensive range of submissions was made by the relevant authorities.
    [Show full text]
  • A Climate Change Risk Assessment for Northern Ireland
    (Defra project code GA0204) A climate change risk assessment for Northern Ireland January 2012 Contractors: HR Wallingford AMEC Environment & Infrastructure UK Ltd (formerly Entec UK Ltd) The Met Office Collingwood Environmental Planning Alexander Ballard Ltd Paul Watkiss Associates Metroeconomica Statement of use: See full statement of use on Page iv. Keywords: Northern Ireland, climate change, risk assessment Research contractor: HR Wallingford Howbery Park, Wallingford, Oxon, OX10 8BA Tel: +44(0)1491 835381 (For contractor quality control purposes this report will form part of report number EX 6473) Defra project officer: Dominic Rowland Defra contact details: Adapting to Climate Change Programme, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) Area 3A Nobel House 17 Smith Square London SW1P 3JR Tel: 020 7238 3000 www.defra.gov.uk/adaptation Document History: Date Release Prepared Notes 25/02/11 1.0 HR Wallingford First release to DoENI 28/03/11 2.0 HR Wallingford Second release to DoENI with amendments based on feedback 17/05/11 3.0 HR Wallingford Third release to DoENI with amendments based on feedback. 16/08/11 3.0A HR Wallingford Partially complete amendments to third release based on feedback and revised specification. 18/11/11 4.0 HR Wallingford Fourth release to DoENI with completed amendments based on feedback on R3 and R3A. 21/12/11 5.0 HR Wallingford Fourth release to DoENI with amendments based on feedback on R4. 20/01/12 6.0 HR Wallingford Final release 24/01/12 7.0 HR Wallingford Minor edits 23/04/12 8.0 HR Wallingford Minor typo corrections 17/05/12 9.0 HR Wallingford Minor edits ii Climate Change Risk Assessment for Northern Ireland Amended 23rd April 2012 from the version published on 25th January 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • River Derg and Tributaries Catchment Status Report 2008
    River Derg and Tributaries Catchment Status Report 2008 Loughs Agency of the Foyle Carlingford and Irish Lights Commission RIVER DERG AND TRIBUTARIES CATCHMENT STATUS REPORT 2008 River Derg and Tributaries Catchment Status Report 2008 Report Reference LA/CSR/05/09 Headquarters 22, Victoria Road Londonderry BT47 2AB Northern Ireland Tel: +44(0)28 71 342100 Fax: +44(0)28 71 342720 [email protected] www.loughs-agency.org Regional Office Dundalk Street Carlingford Co Louth Republic of Ireland Tel+353(0)42 938 3888 Fax+353(0)42 938 3888 carlingford@loughs- agency.org www.loughs-agency.org Written and Prepared by: Art Niven Inside cover picture of hen salmon in breeding Rachel Scott dress courtesy of Atlantic Salmon Trust Declan Lawlor 2 RIVER DERG AND TRIBUTARIES CATCHMENT STATUS REPORT 2008 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 6 Figure 1.0 Main salmon producing rivers and tributaries in the Loughs Agency areas .................. 7 1.1 The Derg Catchment ............................................................................................................... 8 Fig 1.1 Upper section of the River Derg. ......................................................................................... 8 Fig 1.11 Foyle and Carlingford catchments illustrating the main rivers of the Foyle system. ........ 9 1.2 Atlantic Salmon and Sea Trout .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Source to Tap Newsletter: Issue 3
    Subscribe Past Issues Translate RSS Source to Tap Newsletter: Issue 3 Welcome back to the Third Issue of the Source to Tap Newsletter In this issue Education Programme Update Community Engagement during 2018 Water Quality Monitoring Stations Pilot Land Incentive Scheme Update Focus on: MCPA Catchment Snapshot: The Derg Source to Tap - Riverfly Monitoring Group Update Outcomes of NI Water’s Seagahan Catchment Trial Upcoming events Education Programme Update The Source to Tap project has been very active with its schools education programme. During 2018, we delivered 19 school education events engaging with 611 pupils. The education programme works to highlight the importance of our precious drinking water resources and outlines how we can all work together to help protect water quality across our shared catchments. The education programme consists of five interactive learning units which schools can work through one by one or pick and choose to suit their learning needs. A mixture of Activity Workbook exercises supported by educational talks combined with experiment and design based learning activities bring the water environment to life for our young budding scientists. An educational activity booklet has been developed which includes five different units. Additional details of the education programme are available on our project website at: https://www.sourcetotap.eu/learn/ Community Engagement during 2018 The community engagement aspect of the Source to Tap project has also been busy during 2018. The project has attended 4 agricultural shows, including the Balmoral Show, held 8 roadshow events, completed 8 ‘Get to Know’ your catchment events and organised 3 Riverfly training days.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior
    United States Department of the Interior U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service Arizona Ecological Services Office 2321 West Royal Palm Road, Suite 103 Phoenix, Arizona 85021-4951 Telephone:(602) 242-0210 Fax: (602) 242-2513 In reply refer to: AESO/SE 02EAAZ00-2013-F-0363 May 13, 2015 Mr. Tom Osen, Forest Supervisor Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests . Post Office Box 640 Springerville, Arizona 85938-0640 Dear Mr. Osen: Thank you for your May 29, 2014 letter and Biological Assessment (BA), received on that same day, requesting initiation of formal consultation under section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 153·1 et seq.) (ESA). At issue are impacts that may result from the revised programmatic "Land Management Plan for the Apache Sitgreaves National Forests" (LMP) for lands located in Apache, Navajo, and Greenlee Counties, Arizona (dated January 2013). The proposed action may affect the endangered New Mexico meadow jumping mouse (Zapus hudsonius luteus), the threatened Mexican spotted owl (Strix occidentalis lucida) and its critical habitat, the endangered southwestern willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus) and its critical habitat, the threatened yellow-billed cuckoo (Coccyzils americanus occidentalis), the threatened northern Mexican gartersnake ( Thamnophis eques mega/ops), the threatened narrow• headed gartersnake ( Thamnophis rufipunctatus), the threatened Chiricahua leopard frog (Lithobates chiricahuensis) and its critical habitat, the endangered Three Forks springsnail (Pyrgulopsis trivialis) and its critical habitat, the threatened Apache trout (Oncorhynchus gilae apache), the endangered Gila chub (Gila intermedia) and its critical habitat, the threatened Gila . trout ( Oncorhynchus gilae gilae), the endangered spikedace (Meda fulgida ) and its critical habitat, the endangered loach minnow (Tiaroga cobitis) and its critical habitat, and the threatened Little Colorado spinedace (Lepidomeda vittata) and its critical habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • Strabane Visitor Information Centre Railway Street, Strabane Co
    TELEPHONE: WEB: +44 (0) 28 7138 4444 www.derrystrabane.com/Things-To-Do The Sperrin Mountains Strabane Visitor Information Centre Railway Street, Strabane Co. Tyrone BT82 8EF STRABANE VISITOR +44 (0) 28 7138 4444 Text: +44 (0) 28 7137 6646 [email protected] INFORMATION www.derrystrabane.com This information is available upon request in tigermonkey.net / 028 7141 5050 a variety of formats. WELCOME... Strabane Visitor Information Centre is one of Tourism Northern Ireland’s approved visitor information facilities operating within the scenic Sperrin region. The centre offers a wide range of information and services to visitors and locals alike. Our friendly and enthusiastic staff are on hand to assist in making your visit to our area an enjoyable one. Services include: • Free local and national information on: - Events Strabane Visitor Information Centre - Travel and Transport - Activities - Attractions Welcome to the Derry City and For further assistance and - Accommodation Strabane District Council area. information please feel free to • Maps, walking and cycling Offering the opportunity to relax visit us at the Alley Arts Centre, routes available. with an escape to the country, or Railway Street, Strabane, BT82 • Information on Great Britain and indulge in a vibrant city break. This 8EF or contact us via: Republic of Ireland. visitor information guide provides +44 (0) 28 7138 4444 • Souvenirs, postcards and local you with information which will be crafts on sale. beneficial for the duration of your Text: +44 (0) 28 7137 6646 [email protected] • Café and Exibition area. stay and help you to make the www.derrystrabane.com most of your time in Strabane.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatiotemporal Response of Aquatic Native and Nonnative Taxa to Wildfire Disturbance in a Desert Stream Network
    SPATIOTEMPORAL RESPONSE OF AQUATIC NATIVE AND NONNATIVE TAXA TO WILDFIRE DISTURBANCE IN A DESERT STREAM NETWORK by JAMES E. WHITNEY B.S., Emporia State University, 2007 M.S., Kansas State University, 2010 AN ABSTRACT OF A DISSERTATION submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Division of Biology College of Arts and Sciences KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2014 Abstract Many native freshwater animals are imperiled as a result of habitat alteration, species introductions and climate-moderated changes in disturbance regimes. Native conservation and nonnative species management could benefit from greater understanding of critical factors promoting or inhibiting native and nonnative success in the absence of human-caused ecosystem change. The objectives of this dissertation were to (1) explain spatiotemporal patterns of native and nonnative success, (2) describe native and nonnative response to uncharacteristic wildfire disturbance, and (3) test the hypothesis that wildfire disturbance has differential effects on native and nonnative species. This research was conducted across six sites in three reaches (tributary, canyon, and valley) of the unfragmented and largely-unmodified upper Gila River Basin of southwestern New Mexico. Secondary production was measured to quantify success of native and nonnative fishes prior to wildfires during 2008-2011. Native fish production was greater than nonnatives across a range of environmental conditions, although nonnative fish, tadpole, and crayfish production could approach or exceed that of native macroinvertebrates and fishes in canyon habitats, a warmwater tributary, or in valley sites, respectively. The second objective was accomplished by measuring biomass changes of a warmwater native and nonnative community during 2010-2013 before and after consecutive, uncharacteristic wildfires.
    [Show full text]