DOCSLIB.ORG

Management and Control Plan for Bighead, Black, Grass, and Silver Carps in the United States

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Management and Control Plan for Bighead, Black, Grass, and Silver Carps in the United States Bighead carp Silver carp Management and Control Plan for Bighead, Black, Grass, and Silver Carps in the United States Submitted to the Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force Prepared by the Asian Carp Working Group October 2007 Black carp Grass carp © Photo courtesy of Brian Johnson, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Suggested citation for this document: Conover, G., R. Simmonds, and M. Whalen, editors. 2007. Management and control plan for bighead, black, grass, and silver carps in the United States. Asian Carp Working Group, Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force, Washington, D.C. 223 pp. Cover sketches courtesy of Matthew Thomas, Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources. 2 ASIAN CARP WORKING GROUP MEMBERS Name Affiliation John Andersen The Nature Conservancy Mike Armstrong Arkansas Game and Fish Commission Jimmy Avery Mississippi State University Valerie Barko Missouri Department of Conservation Kim Bogenschutz Iowa Department of Natural Resources Joel Brammeier Lake Michigan Federation Beth Brownson Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Sarah Calloway U.S. Forest Service Duane Chapman U.S. Geological Survey Matt Cochran FishPro/Cochran and Wilken, Inc. Mike Conlin Illinois Department of Natural Resources Greg Conover1 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Mark Cornish U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Becky Cudmore Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada John Dettmers Illinois Natural History Survey Carole Engle University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff Thad Finley Farm Cat Livehaulers Jeff Finley U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Tom Flatt Indiana Department of Natural Resources Mike Freeze Keo Fish Farm Jim Garvey Southern Illinois University Chris Goddard Great Lakes Fishery Commission Mike Goehle U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Joanne Grady U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Bart Hawcroft Missouri Department of Agriculture Mike Hoff U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Chris Horton B.A.S.S./ESPN Gary Jensen U.S. Department of Agriculture - Cooperative State Research, Education and Extension Service Anita Kelly Southern Illinois University Jack Kilgore U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Ron Kinnunen Michigan State University - Sea Grant Rob Klumb U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Cindy Kolar U.S. Geological Survey 1 Chairman i Name Affiliation Bill Mattes Great Lakes Indian Fish and Wildlife Commission Bill Mauck University of Missouri – Columbia Paula Moore Jones and Eaker Farms Tom Mosher Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks Phil Moy University of Wisconsin - Sea Grant Elizabeth Murphy U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Marshal Myers Pet Industry Joint Advisory Council John Nickum Private Consultant, Aquatic Policy and Information Center International Leo Nico U.S. Geological Survey Mike Oetker U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Tim Patronski U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Mark Pegg University of Nebraska Jim Petty U.S. Geological Survey Bob Pitman U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Andrew Plauck U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Jerry Rasmussen Mississippi Interstate Cooperative Resource Association Bill Reeves Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency Jay Rendall Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Mike Schaeffer Schaeffer Fish Market Steven Schainost Nebraska Game and Parks Commission Lynn Schlueter North Dakota Game and Fish Commission Hal Schramm U.S. Geological Survey Steve Shults Illinois Department of Natural Resources Rob Simmonds U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Darlene Smith Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada Andy Starostka U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Nathan Stone University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff Kristin TePas Illinois Natural History Survey / Illinois - Indiana Sea Grant Dan Thomas Great Lakes Sport Fishing Council Jay Troxel U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Hugh Warren Catfish Farmers of America Mike Welker U.S. Forest Service Paul Zajicek National Association of State Aquaculture Coordinators ii EDITORS Greg Conover, Asian Carp Working Group Chairman Assistant Project Leader U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Carterville Fishery Resources Office 9053 Route 148, Suite A Marion, Illinois 62959 Phone: (618) 997-6869 Fax: (618) 997-9185 [email protected] Rob Simmonds Project Leader U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Carterville Fishery Resources Office 9053 Route 148, Suite A Marion, IL 62959 Phone: (618) 997-6869 Fax: (618) 997-9185 [email protected] Michelle Whalen Technical Writer U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Migratory Birds and Habitat Programs 911 NE 11th Ave. Portland, OR 97232 Phone: (503) 231-2266 Fax: (503) 231-2019 [email protected] iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank all the members of the Asian Carp Working Group (Working Group) for their role in the collaborative development of this management and control plan. This document is the result of many dedicated individuals who invested numerous personal hours, including nights and weekends, to develop this plan. I am particularly grateful to those Working Group members who actively participated on drafting teams, developed a first draft of the plan for the remainder of the Working Group to build upon, participated in Working Group meetings, and assisted in revising and finalizing this document for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 3 Fisheries Program and the Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force. Duane Chapman, Mike Goehle, Bill Mattes, Jay Rendall, and Hal Schramm provided a valuable contribution to the development of this plan in their voluntary roles as drafting team leaders. Mike Armstrong, Jimmy Avery, Duane Chapman, Carole Engle, Mike Goehle, Jo Grady, Rob Klumb, John Nickum, Steve Shults, Rob Simmonds, Jay Troxel, and Paul Zajicek were instrumental in revising the draft document based on guidance from the Working Group. Tom Mosher, John Nickum, Rob Simmonds, Michelle Whalen, and Paul Zajicek provided editorial reviews of this document. I would like to thank several colleagues that are not members of the Working Group but who contributed to the completion of this management and control plan, including Nate Caswell, Andrew Plauck, Shelley Simmonds, and Colby Wrasse. Mary Balogh, Sara Dolan, Mike Hoff, Tim Patronski, and Mike Stahl assisted in summarizing state regulations by providing data or developing GIS based maps. Andrew Mitchell, U.S. Department of Agriculture, though not an official member of the Working Group, provided valuable contributions throughout the development of this plan. Many other colleagues assisted in the development or review of specific materials or provided expertise through personal communications that are cited throughout the document. Susan Parks facilitated Working Group meetings and provided documentation for the completion of this plan. I would also like to thank Gerry Jackson and Everett Wilson for their participation in Working Group meetings and their guidance throughout this process. Kari Duncan, Mike Hoff, Mike Oetker, Rob Simmonds, and Erin Williams also provided guidance throughout this process for which I am grateful. Greg Conover Chair, Asian Carp Working Group iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY There are many carps native to Asia, including seven that have been introduced to the United States. For the purposes of this document the term “Asian carps” refers to four species: black carp (Mylopharyngodon piceus), bighead carp (Hypophthalmichthys nobilis), grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella), and silver carp (H. molitrix). Feral bighead, grass, and silver carps have all established reproducing populations in several major rivers of the United States. To date, there have been at least 14 confirmed collections of adult black carp by commercial fishers in the United States and unconfirmed reports of adult black carp captured annually in the Mississippi River and its tributaries over the past 13 years (Nico 2007; Nico et al. 2005). There have been no collections of black carp eggs and larvae or observations of spawning (Nico et al. 2005). The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) requested and co-funded the completion of risk assessments by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) that analyzed the probability and consequences of a species becoming established in the United States. Using risk assessment methods described by the Risk Assessment and Management Committee (1996), the USGS concluded that the organism risk potentials for bighead, black, and silver carps are all high (i.e., an unacceptable risk; Kolar et al. 2007; Nico et al. 2005). A national risk assessment for grass carp has not been completed and state-level risk assessments may still be needed where grass carp have not been reported or where the species has not become established. The life history traits of Asian carps (e.g., reproductive capability, population densities, feeding habits, broad climate tolerance, mobility, and longevity) indicate that these four species have a high probability of causing ecological and economic effects where populations become established (Mandrak and Cudmore 2004; Kolar et al. 2007; Nico et al. 2005). In some locations of the Mississippi River Basin, such effects have occurred. Natural resources managers are concerned that Asian carps have the potential to cause extensive and irreversible changes to the aquatic environment, particularly those that have been extensively altered and are severely impacted by on-going physical and chemical stressors, thereby jeopardizing the long-term sustainability of native aquatic species, particularly to imperiled, threatened, and endangered species. The USFWS added all forms of live silver carp to the list of injurious wildlife under the Lacey Act, prohibiting their importation and interstate transport (except
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fish, Crustaceans, Molluscs, Etc Capture Production by Species
    440 Fish, crustaceans, molluscs, etc Capture production by species items Asia - Inland waters C-04 Poissons, crustacés, mollusques, etc Captures par catégories d'espèces Asie - Eaux continentales (a) Peces, crustáceos, moluscos, etc Capturas por categorías de especies Asia - Aguas continentales English name Scientific name Species group Nom anglais Nom scientifique Groupe d'espèces 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Nombre inglés Nombre científico Grupo de especies t t t t t t t Freshwater bream Abramis brama 11 16 375 22 345 21 073 17 834 19 313 22 083 17 612 Freshwater breams nei Abramis spp 11 33 27 92 13 11 9 1 Common carp Cyprinus carpio 11 36 617 39 126 39 104 32 466 34 723 46 360 42 166 Tench Tinca tinca 11 935 2 082 1 792 1 953 1 884 1 632 1 482 Crucian carp Carassius carassius 11 4 330 3 538 4 621 3 429 3 865 4 921 3 656 Goldfish Carassius auratus 11 1 1 2 2 3 1 1 Roach Rutilus rutilus 11 149 287 358 420 521 577 535 Kutum Rutilus frisii 11 9 015 7 052 9 649 16 138 17 242 14 885 12 536 Roaches nei Rutilus spp 11 1 450 1 700 1 537 2 088 2 383 4 848 4 211 Common dace Leuciscus leuciscus 11 82 93 87 85 82 71 63 Mud carp Cirrhinus molitorella 11 11 10 8 - - - - Grass carp(=White amur) Ctenopharyngodon idellus 11 1 959 2 458 3 066 3 312 4 417 4 215 4 567 Beardless barb Cyclocheilichthys apogon 11 ..
    [Show full text]
  • Pest Risk Assessment for Asian Carps in Oregon
    Pest Risk Assessment for Asian Carps in Oregon IDENTITY Name: Asian Carps The common usage of the term “Asian Carps” encompasses the following four species of introduced carp (there are additional species of carp native to Asia that have been introduced into the U.S. but are not commonly included under term “Asian Carps” – see text). • bighead carp (Hypophthalmichthys nobilis) • silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix) • black carp (Mylopharyngodon piceus) • grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) Taxonomic Position: order Cypriniformes, family Cyprinidae [carps and minnows] The family Cyprinidae is very diverse – it includes species that feed on plankton, herbivores, omnivores, piscivores (fish eaters such as our native pike minnow) and species like the black carp whose teeth are specially modified to crush the shells of mussels and snails - and as such it can be difficult to distinguish native versus nonnative species based on a few simple characteristics. Nevertheless, the collection of nonnative species such as Asian carps should be reported to the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife. Positive identification is crucial and for this reason we recommend retaining the specimen if possible or documenting the catch with photographs. Well-focused images that show the whole fish from various angles as well as close-ups of the head and fins are ideal. Additional information on identification of Asian and other nonnative carps has been compiled by the US Geological Survey and can be accessed online <http://fisc.er.usgs.gov/Carp_ID/index.html>. RISK RATING SUMMARY Relative Risk Rating: HIGH Numerical Score: 6 (on a 1-9 scale) Uncertainty: Moderate This Risk Evaluation summarizes much of the information previously compiled by the USFWS in 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Carp, Bighead (Hypophthalmichthys Nobilis)
    Bighead Carp (Hypophthalmichthys nobilis) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, February 2011 Revised, June 2018 Web Version, 8/16/2018 Photo: A. Benson, USGS. Public domain. Available: https://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/FactSheet.aspx?SpeciesID=551. (June 2018). 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Jennings (1988): “The bighead carp is endemic to eastern China, […] in the lowland rivers of the north China plain and South China, including the Huai (Huai Ho), Yangtze, Pearl, West (Si Kiang), Han Chiang and Min rivers (Herre 1934; Mori 1936; Chang 1966; Chunsheng et al. 1980).” Status in the United States From Nico et al. (2018): “This species has been recorded from within, or along the borders of, at least 18 states. There is evidence of reproducing populations in the middle and lower Mississippi and Missouri rivers and the species is apparently firmly established in the states of Illinois and Missouri (Burr et al. 1996; Pflieger 1997). Pflieger (1997) received first evidence of natural reproduction, capture of young 1 bighead carp, in Missouri in 1989. Burr and Warren (1993) reported on the taking of a postlarval fish in southern Illinois in 1992. Subsequently, Burr et al. (1996) noted that bighead carp appeared to be using the lower reaches of the Big Muddy, Cache, and Kaskaskia rivers in Illinois as spawning areas. Tucker et al. (1996) also found young-of-the-year in their 1992 and 1994 collections in the Mississippi River of Illinois and Missouri. Douglas et al. (1996) collected more than 1600 larvae of this genus from a backwater outlet of the Black River in Louisiana in 1994.
    [Show full text]
  • Aging Techniques & Population Dynamics of Blue Suckers (Cycleptus Elongatus) in the Lower Wabash River
    Eastern Illinois University The Keep Masters Theses Student Theses & Publications Summer 2020 Aging Techniques & Population Dynamics of Blue Suckers (Cycleptus elongatus) in the Lower Wabash River Dakota S. Radford Eastern Illinois University Follow this and additional works at: https://thekeep.eiu.edu/theses Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons Recommended Citation Radford, Dakota S., "Aging Techniques & Population Dynamics of Blue Suckers (Cycleptus elongatus) in the Lower Wabash River" (2020). Masters Theses. 4806. https://thekeep.eiu.edu/theses/4806 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Theses & Publications at The Keep. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of The Keep. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AGING TECHNIQUES & POPULATION DYNAMICS OF BLUE SUCKERS (CYCLEPTUS ELONGATUS) IN THE LOWER WABASH RIVER By Dakota S. Radford B.S. Environmental Biology Eastern Illinois University A thesis prepared for the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Department of Biological Sciences Eastern Illinois University May 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS Thesis abstract .................................................................................................................... iii Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................ iv List of Tables .......................................................................................................................v
    [Show full text]
  • Asian Carp Factsheet
    ASIANINVASIVE SPECIES PROFILE CARP David Riecks, UIUC/Illinois-Indiana Sea Grant sian carp are a group of fish in the minnow family that are native to Asia. The term “Asian carp” refers to Bighead carp, Silver carp, Grass carp, and Black carp. Each of these species was intentionally introduced into the United States for different purposes; however, all are now considered invasive. Invasive species are plants, animals, and Aother organisms that are not native and have the potential to cause harm. Asian carp compete with native species and pose a threat to Indiana’s aquatic ecosystems. Why Asian carp are a problem Where Asian carp • Reduce game fish populations: Because Asian carp are found in Indiana reproduce rapidly, their explosive populations reduce the Asian carp were originally imported number and health of other fish. to the southern United States to • Threaten human health: Asian carp (specifically Silver Carp) help aquaculture and wastewater often jump out of the water when disturbed by boat motors, treatment facilities keep retention causing damage to boats and potentially harming passengers. ponds clean. Flooding and accidental • Negatively impact native species: An adult Bighead or Silver releases allowed these fish to escape carp can eat up to 40% of its body weight every day. Over into the Mississippi River system. time, Asian carp can drastically change the food chain and Asian carp have since migrated into potentially displace other species. the Ohio, White, and Wabash rivers • Threaten imperiled species: Asian carp are a threat to where they are now common. already threatened and endangered species. How you can help • It is illegal to possess live Asian carp.
    [Show full text]
  • Wetlands, Biodiversity and the Ramsar Convention
    Wetlands, Biodiversity and the Ramsar Convention Wetlands, Biodiversity and the Ramsar Convention: the role of the Convention on Wetlands in the Conservation and Wise Use of Biodiversity edited by A. J. Hails Ramsar Convention Bureau Ministry of Environment and Forest, India 1996 [1997] Published by the Ramsar Convention Bureau, Gland, Switzerland, with the support of: • the General Directorate of Natural Resources and Environment, Ministry of the Walloon Region, Belgium • the Royal Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Denmark • the National Forest and Nature Agency, Ministry of the Environment and Energy, Denmark • the Ministry of Environment and Forests, India • the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Sweden Copyright © Ramsar Convention Bureau, 1997. Reproduction of this publication for educational and other non-commercial purposes is authorised without prior perinission from the copyright holder, providing that full acknowledgement is given. Reproduction for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without the prior written permission of the copyright holder. The views of the authors expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect those of the Ramsar Convention Bureau or of the Ministry of the Environment of India. Note: the designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Ranasar Convention Bureau concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Citation: Halls, A.J. (ed.), 1997. Wetlands, Biodiversity and the Ramsar Convention: The Role of the Convention on Wetlands in the Conservation and Wise Use of Biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Canterbury Mudfish 11
    NEW ZEALAND MUDFISHES A GUIDE Nicholas Ling NEW ZEALAND MUDFISHES A GUIDE Nicholas Ling New Zealand mudfishes: a guide First published 2001 Acknowledgements: This publication originated from Department of Conservation, Science & Research Division contract 2485, and was published with financial assistance from the J.S.Watson Trust, Forest and Bird Society of New Zealand. Photographs © Nicholas Ling, Barry O’Brien and Tony Eldon. Drawings © Catherine Beard ISBN 0-478-22175-4 Published by Department of Conservation University of Waikato P O Box 10-420 Private Bag 3105 Wellington Hamilton CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 WHAT ARE MUDFISHES 2 MUDFISH HABITATS AND ECOLOGY 3 AESTIVATION – A FISH OUT OF WATER 7 BLACK MUDFISH 8 NORTHLAND MUDFISH 9 BROWN MUDFISH 10 CANTERBURY MUDFISH 11 STUDYING MUDFISHES 12 KEEPING MUDFISHES 13 MUDFISH IDENTIFICATION 14 MUDFISH CONSERVATION 16 GLOSSARY 19 FURTHER READING 20 Introduction n New Zealand’s mudfishes are unusual fish by any standards. When their wetland habitats dry out in summer, they burrow into the soil and remain there, motionless, breathing air, until the first decent flood of autumn refills the wetland and washes them from their refuge. Few fish species worldwide have such ability to survive for extended periods out of water. Early settlers in New Zealand were surprised to find live fish when digging vegetables from the earth. This ability to survive prolonged periods of drought allows them to colonise habitats that would be unsuitable for conventional fishes, which cannot survive out of water. These cryptic, nocturnal fish were probably once the most abundant freshwater fish in New Zealand. However, the loss of more than 90% of our wetlands over the past two centuries has confined them to a few refuge habitats still threatened by development of adjacent land.
    [Show full text]
  • Pathogen Susceptibility of Silver Carp (Hypophthalmichthys Molitrix) and Bighead Carp (Hypophthalmichthys Nobilis) in the Wabash River Watershed
    Pathogen Susceptibility of Silver Carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix) and Bighead Carp (Hypophthalmichthys nobilis) in the Wabash River Watershed FINAL REPORT Kensey Thurner PhD Student Maria S Sepúlveda, Reuben Goforth, Cecon Mahapatra Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907 Jon Amberg, US Geological Service, Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center, La Crosse, WI 54603 Eric Leis, US Fish and Widlife Service, La Crosse Fish Health Center, Onalaska, WI 54650 9/22/2014 Silver Carp (top) and Bighead Carp (bottom) caught in the Tippecanoe River, Photos by Alison Coulter Final Report 9/22/2014 - Page 2 Executive Summary The Pathogen Susceptibility of Silver Carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix) and Bighead Carp (Hypophthalmichthys nobilis) in the Wabash River Watershed project was undertaken to address the lack of available information regarding pathogens in the highly invasive Silver and Bighead Carps, collectively known as bigheaded carps. Very little is known about the prevalence and effects of parasites, bacteria and viruses on the health of invasive bigheaded carp populations in the United States or the effects of bigheaded carps on the disease risk profile for sympatric, native fish of the U.S. The main objectives of this project were to conduct a systematic survey of parasites, bacteria and viruses of Asian carps and a representative number of native Indiana fish species in the upper and middle Wabash and the lower Tippecanoe Rivers, Indiana; to determine the susceptibility of Asian carps to a representative number of natural pathogens using in vitro approaches; and to involve anglers in the development of a cost effective state-wide surveillance program for documentation of viral diseases of fish.
    [Show full text]
  • Disconnecting Places: Asian Carp and Other Aquatic Invasive Species of Concern for the Calumet Region
    Disconnecting Places: Asian Carp and Other Aquatic Invasive Species of Concern for the Calumet Region Reuben Keller Henry Chandler Cowles Lecturer in Environmental Studies University of Chicago [email protected] Invasive Aquatic Species in the Calumet Region Invasive Aquatic Species in the Calumet Region Invasive Aquatic Species in the Calumet Region Invasive Aquatic Species in the Calumet Region Invasive Aquatic Species in the Calumet Region Invasive Aquatic Species in the Calumet Region Invasive Aquatic Species in the Calumet Region Invasive Aquatic Species in the Calumet Region Future Invaders?? Future Invaders?? Future Invaders?? Calumet Region is Globally Connected 2) Shipping 1) Canals 3) Trades Chicago Sanitary and Shipping Canal • Opened in 1900 • Connects Great Lakes and Mississippi watersheds • Originally too polluted, but now a pathway for species spread • Zebra mussel, round goby; Asian carps? Others? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Chicago‐Sanitary‐and‐Ship‐Canal.jpg Asian Carp • Native to East Asia • Introduced to southern fish farms and water treatment plants • Silver (1970s) and Bighead (1980s) carp populations found in the Mississippi River • Rapid spread North, now in the Chicago Area Waterways http://www.lrc.usace.army.mil/pao/16April2010_eDNA_update.pdf Asian Carps Are Here Because Calumet Waterways are Globally Connected Silver carp native range Kolar et al. 2005. Figure 11. Asian Carps Are Here Because Calumet Waterways are Globally Connected Silver carp native range Kolar et al. 2005. Figure 11. Asian Carps Are Here Because Calumet Waterways are Globally Connected Silver carp native range Kolar et al. 2005. Figure 11. Asian Carps Are Here Because Calumet Waterways are Globally Connected Silver carp native range Kolar et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Control of Invasive Fish and Aquatic Invertebrates: a Brief Review with Case Studies
    Management of Biological Invasions (2019) Volume 10, Issue 2: 227–254 CORRECTED PROOF Review Biological control of invasive fish and aquatic invertebrates: a brief review with case studies Przemyslaw G. Bajer1,*, Ratna Ghosal1,+, Maciej Maselko2, Michael J. Smanski2, Joseph D. Lechelt1, Gretchen Hansen3 and Matthew S. Kornis4 1University of Minnesota, Minnesota Aquatic Invasive Species Research Center, Dept. of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology, 135 Skok Hall, 2003 Upper Buford Circle, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA 2University of Minnesota, Dept. of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics, 1479 Gortner Ave., Room 344, St. Paul MN 55108, USA 3Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, 500 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, MN 55155, USA 4U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Great Lakes Fish Tag and Recovery Laboratory, Green Bay Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office, 2661 Scott Tower Drive, New Franken, WI 54229, USA +Current Address: Biological and Life Sciences, School of Arts and Sciences, Ahmedabad University, Gujarat 380009, India Author e-mails: [email protected] (PGB), [email protected] (RG), [email protected] (MM), [email protected] (MJS), [email protected] (JDL), [email protected] (GH), [email protected] (MSK) *Corresponding author Citation: Bajer PG, Ghosal R, Maselko M, Smanski MJ, Lechelt JD, Hansen G, Abstract Kornis MS (2019) Biological control of invasive fish and aquatic invertebrates: a We review various applications of biocontrol for invasive fish and aquatic brief review with case studies. invertebrates. We adopt a broader definition of biocontrol that includes traditional Management of Biological Invasions 10(2): methods like predation and physical removal (biocontrol by humans), and modern 227–254, https://doi.org/10.3391/mbi.2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Composition and Abundance of Drifting Fish Eggs on the Upper Reaches of Xijiang
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.13.904110; this version posted January 13, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 1 Composition and Abundance of Drifting Fish Eggs on the Upper Reaches of Xijiang 2 River, China, after the Formation of the Cascade Reservoirs 3 4 Short title: Composition and Abundance of Drifting Fish Eggs in the Upper Reaches of a 5 River after Dam Formation 6 Gao Minghui1, Wu Zhiqiang2, 3, Tan Xichang4, Huang Liangliang3, Huang Haibo3 and Liu Hao3 7 8 1 College of Life Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 350000, Guangxi, 9 China 10 2 School of Marine Sciences, Guangxi University, Nanning 350000, Guangxi, China 11 3 College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 12 541000, Guangxi, China. 13 4 ZhuJiang Water Conservancy Bureau, Ministry of Water Resources, Guangzhou 510000, 14 Guangdong, China 15 16 Corresponding Author: 17 Wu Zhiqiang 18 Yanshan Town, Guilin, Guangxi 54100, China 19 Email address: [email protected] 20 21 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.13.904110; this version posted January 13, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
    [Show full text]
  • Asian Carp Status Report
    Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat National Capital Region Science Advisory Report 2005/001 ASIAN CARP STATUS REPORT Figure 1: Map of DFO’s six administrative regions. § Photo credits (from top to bottom): Grass Carp, Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters; Bighead Carp, David Riecks, University of Illinois; Silver Carp, [email protected]; and Black Carp, Leo G. Nico. Context The intentional or accidental release of non-native species into Canadian waters poses a threat to native species and overall biodiversity. Non-native species can alter habitat, compete with native species for food or habitat, prey upon native species, and act as vectors for new diseases or parasites that could spread to native species. There is also a risk of introducing non-native genes into native populations through hybridisation. Any of these effects could have further widespread, detrimental impacts on native species and communities. Four species of Asian carp (grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella), bighead carp (Hypophthalmichthys nobilis), silver carp (H. molitrix), and black carp (Mylopharyngodon piceus)) have been imported into the United States for use in aquaculture, and for the biological control of aquatic vegetation and parasites. Although all species were brought in for culture, and often triploid strains were developed and maintained, all four species have escaped into the wild. Self-sustaining populations of three of these species (grass, bighead and silver carps) have been established, particularly in the Mississippi drainage. Grass and bighead carps are the two species reported to be imported live into Canada for the live food fish industry, particularly in Toronto, Montreal and Vancouver. Black carp has been historically reported as imported and silver carp has been observed for sale, but not officially reported.
    [Show full text]