2021 May Edition
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) Handbook
INDIVIDUAL READY RESERVE Did you know... An Orientation Handbook for IRR Soldiers & Address Update As changes occur, please update your contact information by calling your career manager at 1-888-ARMY-HRC or by mailing the form below. For Enlisted to mail to: For Officers to mail to: Human Resources Command Human Resources Command ATTN: ARHC-EPO-D ATTN: ARHC-OPL-P 1600 Spearhead Division Ave. 1600 Spearhead Division Ave. Fort Knox, KY 40122-5102 Fort Knox, KY 40122-5102 Date: AKO e-mail address: Alternate e-mail address: Last Name: First Name: Current Address: Temporary Address (if applicable): Home Phone: Cell Phone: Work Phone: Fax: Signature: ________________________________________________________ If you have questions about this form or the information requested, contact The Human Resource Contact Center at 1-888-ARMY-HRC. Please visit the U.S. Army Human Resources Command website at www.hrc.army.mil Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) Did you know…. IRR Affiliation Program (IAP) p.1 You are in the IRR. What is the IRR? p.2 You can get promoted and complete your military education while in the IRR. p.3 You can do active tours while in the IRR. p.4-5 There are training opportunities available in the IRR. p.6 You can drill or complete correspondence courses for retirement points. p.6 Examples of retirement pay and how to calculate it. p.7-8 There are expectations and requirements while assigned to the IRR. p.9 What is my Military Service Obligation? p.10 Minimum IRR Annual Participation Requirements. p.11-13 Selected Reserve Benefits Opportunities available in the Selected Reserves. -
Improving the Total Force Using National Guard and Reserves
IMPROVING THE TOTAL FORCE USING THE NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVES A Report for the transition to the new administration by The Reserve Forces Policy Board RFPB Report FY17-01 This report, Report FY17-01, is a product of the Reserve Forces Policy Board. The Reserve Forces Policy Board is, by law, a federal advisory committee within the Office of the Secretary of Defense. As mandated by Congress, it serves as an independent adviser to provide advice and recommendations directly to the Secretary of Defense on strategies, policies, and practices designed to improve and enhance the capabilities, efficiency, and effectiveness of the reserve components. The content and recommendations contained herein do not necessarily represent the official position of the Department of Defense. As required by the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972, Title 5, and the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 41, Section 102-3 (Federal Advisory Committee Management), this report and its contents were deliberated and approved in several open, public sessions. IMPROVING THE TOTAL FORCE USING THE NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVES A Report for the transition to the new administration by The Reserve Forces Policy Board RFPB Report FY17-01 4 5 6 Chairman Punaro introduces the Secretary of Defense, the Honorable Ashton B. Carter, during the June 9, 2015 Board Meeting. “The presence, skill and readiness of Citizen Warriors across the country give us the agility and flexibility to handle unexpected demands, both at home and abroad. It is an essential component of our total force, and a linchpin of our readiness.” 1 - Secretary of Defense Ash Carter 1 As Delivered by Secretary of Defense Ash Carter, Pentagon Auditorium, Aug. -
Reserve Component Personnel Issues: Questions and Answers
Reserve Component Personnel Issues: Questions and Answers Updated June 15, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RL30802 Reserve Component Personnel Issues: Questions and Answers Summary The Constitution provides Congress with broad powers over the Armed Forces, including the power to “to raise and support Armies,” “to provide and maintain a Navy,” “to make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces” and “to provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States.” In the exercise of this constitutional authority, Congress has historically shown great interest in various issues that bear on the vitality of the reserve components, such as funding, equipment, and personnel policy. This report is designed to provide an overview of key reserve component personnel issues. The term “Reserve Component” refers collectively to the seven individual reserve components of the Armed Forces: the Army National Guard of the United States, the Army Reserve, the Navy Reserve, the Marine Corps Reserve, the Air National Guard of the United States, the Air Force Reserve, and the Coast Guard Reserve. The purpose of these seven reserve components, as codified in law at 10 U.S.C. §10102, is to “provide trained units and qualified persons available for active duty in the armed forces, in time of war or national emergency, and at such other times as the national security may require, to fill the needs of the armed forces whenever more units and persons are needed than are in the regular components.” During the Cold War era, the reserve components were a manpower pool that was rarely used. -
Department of Defense Office of the Secretary
Monday, May 16, 2005 Part LXII Department of Defense Office of the Secretary Base Closures and Realignments (BRAC); Notice VerDate jul<14>2003 10:07 May 13, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\16MYN2.SGM 16MYN2 28030 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 93 / Monday, May 16, 2005 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Headquarters U.S. Army Forces Budget/Funding, Contracting, Command (FORSCOM), and the Cataloging, Requisition Processing, Office of the Secretary Headquarters U.S. Army Reserve Customer Services, Item Management, Command (USARC) to Pope Air Force Stock Control, Weapon System Base Closures and Realignments Base, NC. Relocate the Headquarters 3rd Secondary Item Support, Requirements (BRAC) U.S. Army to Shaw Air Force Base, SC. Determination, Integrated Materiel AGENCY: Department of Defense. Relocate the Installation Management Management Technical Support ACTION: Notice of Recommended Base Agency Southeastern Region Inventory Control Point functions for Closures and Realignments. Headquarters and the U.S. Army Consumable Items to Defense Supply Network Enterprise Technology Center Columbus, OH, and reestablish SUMMARY: The Secretary of Defense is Command (NETCOM) Southeastern them as Defense Logistics Agency authorized to recommend military Region Headquarters to Fort Eustis, VA. Inventory Control Point functions; installations inside the United States for Relocate the Army Contracting Agency relocate the procurement management closure and realignment in accordance Southern Region Headquarters to Fort and related support functions for Depot with Section 2914(a) of the Defense Base Sam Houston. Level Reparables to Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, and designate them as Closure and Realignment Act of 1990, as Operational Army (IGPBS) amended (Pub. -
The Military Draft and a Possible War with Iraq
Order Code RL31682 Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web The Military Draft and a Possible War with Iraq December 31, 2002 nae redacted Specialist in National Defense Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress The Military Draft and a Possible War with Iraq Summary Since the possibility of a second major war with Iraq became apparent in mid- 2002, interest and concern about a return to the draft have manifested themselves for the first time since the 1991 Persian Gulf War. As was the case in 1991, a review of military manpower levels and potential war scenarios suggests that only a prolonged war, with major military reverses for U.S. forces, or new international developments creating the need for substantially larger armed forces, would result in a military requirement to reinstitute the draft. Virtually all proposed scenarios for a war with Iraq assume that it would not last long enough, result in high enough American casualties, or require enough additional forces to necessitate a draft. The military rationale for resuming the draft to meet the needs of the armed forces for manpower during an Iraqi war, therefore, does not seem to be compelling. However, there are possible scenarios that might tax the ability of the armed forces to recruit a sufficient number of volunteers. One such scenario could combine an Iraqi conflict with other confrontations (e.g., North Korea). Other scenarios could involve the need for very large peacetime deployments of U.S. forces (e.g., the possible occupation of a defeated Iraq) or major demands for domestic deployments based on threatened or actual terrorist activity. -
Employment Protections for Members of the West Virginia National Guard
WV-2015-NG Employment Protections For Members Of The West VirginiA NAtionAl GuArd By Nathan M. Richardson1 Today’s National Guard traces its origins to 1636, when the Massachusetts Bay Colony established the Massachusetts militia to defend the colony against attacks by the Pequot Indians. Other colonies and states later established similar state militias. Early in the 20th Century, Congress established the National Guard as a hybrid federal-state organization. National Guard members are subject to call by the President for national emergencies, and they train periodically for that contingency. National Guard members are also subject to state call-ups, by the Governor. A federal statute called the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA)2 accords the right to reemployment to a person who leaves a civilian job (federal, state, local, or private sector) for voluntary or involuntary service in the uniformed services (as defined by USERRA) and who meets the USERRA eligibility criteria.3 USERRA protects the civilian jobs of National Guard members after military training or service under title 10 or title 32 of the United States Code, but USERRA does not apply to state active duty. If National Guard members are to have reemployment rights after state active duty, it must be by state law. Like every other state, West Virginia has enacted a statute to protect the civilian jobs of National Guard members on state active duty. Section 15-1F-8 of the Code of West Virginia provides: Members of the organized militia4 in the active service of the state shall be entitled to the same reemployment rights granted to members of the reserve components of the armed forces of the United States by applicable federal law. -
Structuring US Forces After the Cold
CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE CBC) STIJDY STRUCTURING U.S. FORCES AFTER THE COLD WAR: COSTS AND EFFECTS OF INCREASED RELIANCE ON THE RESERVES The Congress of the United States Congressional Budget Office NOTES All years referred to in the study are fiscal years, unless otherwise noted. All dollars are expressed in 1993 budget authority, unless otherwise specified. The study uses the Department of Defense's fiscal year 1993 inflation as sumptions. Details in text and tables may not add to totals because of rounding. Reserves with a lowercase "r" refers to personnel in both National Guard and Reserve components. Cover photo: Members of the Puerto Rican National Guard disembark from a C-130 Hercules aircraft during Operation Ocean Venture '82. (U .S. Navy photo by PH1 W. Nanny.) Preface ow ready for war do U.S. military forces need to be during peacetime? The question has special importance in the austere budget climate fac H ing the nation, since maintaining a high level of readiness can be. ex- pensive. The appropriate answer may also have changed in recent years be cause of significant reductions in the threats to U.S. security. The Congress has expressed particular interest in one important factor in determining military readiness: the portions of forces serving on active duty and in the part-time reserve. In recent years, the Congress has mandated in creased reliance on existing types of reserves and has also called for experi menting with new types of reserve units. This study, requested by the Committee on the Budget of the United States Senate, analyzes the cost and effects of various mixes of active and reserve forces, including both existing types and new ones. -
West Virginia National Guard Annual Report 2012
West Virginia National Guard Annual Report 2012 3 3 West Virginia National Guard Annual Report 2012 4 West Virginia National Guard Annual Report 2012 State OF WEST VIRGINIA OFFICE OF THE ADJUTANT GENERAL 1703 COONSKIN DRIVE CHARLESTON, WEST VIRGINIA 25311-1085 James A. Hoyer Major General, WVARNG The Adjutant General December 31, 2012 The Honorable Earl Ray Tomblin Governor, State of West Virginia State Capitol Complex Charleston, West Virginia 25305 Dear Governor Tomblin: It is my honor and pleasure to submit the 2012 Annual Report of the Adjutant General. The West Virginia National Guard completed an outstanding year of service to our Nation and State. The accomplishments described in this report reflect the readiness, dedication and professionalism of our citizen-Soldiers. When it comes to helping the citizens of West Virginia recover from floods, tornadoes, derechos or snow storms, you can rest assured that the West Virginia National Guard will answer the call. In addition to our State Emergency Duty during the last year, West Virginia Soldiers and Airmen were called upon to provide for the defense of our homeland and to fight the continuing war on terrorism. Our State continues to provide well-trained National Guard units for Federal and State deployments. Your leadership and support has been vital to the success of the West Virginia National Guard. We continue to be recognized as one of the best military organizations in the world. More than 6,500 West Virginia National Guard members and I say “thank you.” The West Virginia National Guard will continue to safeguard the welfare and freedom of our great State and Nation. -
NSIAD-92-67 Operation Desert Storm Executive Summary
I Jnikd Stattv~ Gctnttral Accounting Office Rqwrt to the Chairman, Subcommittee ” GAO OXIReadiness, Committee on Armed Swvices, House of Representatives OPERATION DESERT STORM Army Had Difficulty Providing Adequate Active and Reserve Support Forces United States General Accounting OfYice GAO Washington, D.C. 20648 National Security and International AfYairs Division B-244872 March lo,1992 The Honorable Earl Hutto Chairman, Subcommittee on Readiness, Committee on Armed Services House of Representatives Dear Mr. Chairman: This report responds to your request that we review the Army’s provision of support forces for Operations Desert Shield and Storm. It discusses how the Army selected support forces for these operations, how it readied these forces to deploy, and how well its force structure accommodated the operations’ need for ready support forces. It contains recommendations to the Secretaries of Defense and the Army aimed at improving the Army’s ability to support future conflicts and a matter for congressional consideration related to the President’s reserve call-up authority. As agreed with your office, unless you publicly announce the contents of this report earlier, we plan no further distribution of it until 10 days from the date of this letter. At that time, we will send copies to interested parties and make copies available to others upon request. Please call Richard Davis, Director, Army Issues, at (202) 2764141 if you have any questions concerning this report. GAO staff members who made major contributions to this report are listed in appendix I. Sincerely yours, Prank C. Conahan Assistant Comptroller General Executive Summary Support forces were critical to the success of Operations Desert Shield Purpose and Storm. -
130 Airlift Wing
130 AIRLIFT WING MISSION LINEAGE 130 Air Commando Group, Jul 1960 Redesignated 130 Special Operations Group Redesignated 130 Tactical Airlift Group, Redesignated 130 Airlift Group, 15 Mar 1992 Redesignated 130 Airlift Wing 1 Oct 1995 STATIONS Charleston, WV ASSIGNMENTS WEAPON SYSTEMS Mission Aircraft C-45, 1955-1960 C-46, 1955-1958 SA-16, 1956-1963 C-47, 1963-1967 C-119, 1963 U-10, 1963-1974 U-6, 1965-1967 U-10 C-54, 1967-1971 C-130, 1975 Support Aircraft COMMANDERS Col Roger L. Nye Col TiMothy L. Frye Col Herbert C. Wheeler HONORS Service Streamers Campaign Streamers Armed Forces Expeditionary Streamers Decorations EMBLEM Azure, on a base celeste two bars wavy argent surMonted by a chevron gules, fiMbriated of the third, in chief an arched scroll gules fiMbriated argent above a parachute in pale of the last flanked to dexter by a-single aircraft ascending and to sinister by two stylized aircraft ascending all of the like, all within a diMinished bordure silver gray. Bendy of four gules and argent in base a pattern of fig leaves vert to dexter and five arrows radiating to sinister of the second surMounted by a sphere azure gridlined of the second, supporting a falcon with wings elevated, (upper legs, lower portion of head and body of the last, eye, upper portion of head and body brown, beak and lower legs or) the entire garnished of the fourth, on a chief of the last fiMbriated or twenty Mullets of five points fesswise seven, seven, and six argent, all within a diMinished bordure gold. -
California State Military Reserve Establishes Maritime Component By: MAJ(CA)K.J
SPRING SDF Times 2017 Coming Soon! Presidents Message SDF Times - Next Edition 30 July 2017 Submission Deadline Our State Defense Forces stand at the threshold of even greater opportunity to serve our states and nation. The confluence of our federal budget crisis, state Items for Annual Conference Board Consideration budget difficulties, increased extreme weather systems and threats of terrorism, 1 August 2017 provide a challenging environment that our troops can provide a meaningful solu- Submission Deadline tion. We now have an established track record of excellence upon which we can build an even more elite force. 2017 SGAUS Annual Conference 21-24 September 2017 Myrtle Beach, SC Members of SGAUS, as you may know, I have just come off of a Chaplain Training & Conference 21-23 September 2017 whirlwind U.S. congressional cam- Myrtle Beach, SC paign launched with broad-based support. It was an extraordinary PAO/PIO Training & Conference 22 September 2017 experience in which the great suc- Myrtle Beach, SC cess of our South Carolina State Guard was made an issue. Judge Advocate & Engineer We enjoyed particularly strong Training & Conference 22-23 September 2017 support among military veterans Myrtle Beach, SC throughout the district and across the state. And we received MEMS & Medical Conference 23 September 2017 the published endorsements of Myrtle Beach, SC several of those veterans, includ- ing two MEDAL OF HONOR recipients – Maj. Gen. Jim SGAUS Stipend, Scholarship, & Soldier/NCO/Officer of the Year Livingston, U.S. Marine Corps (Ret.) and LT Mike Thornton, U.S. Navy SEALs (Ret.). Program Their stories by the way, like all recipients of our nation’s highest award for com- 15 March 2018 bat valor, are beyond remarkable. -
Fiscal Year 2020 Legislative Resolutions 2 Legislative Resolutions
FISCAL YEAR 2020 LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTIONS 2 LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTIONS // www.ngaus.org CONTENTS www.ngaus.org // LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTIONS 3 4. A Letter from Our Chairman 24. Air Resolutions 6. About NGAUS 56. Joint Resolutions 8. NGAUS Legislative Team 92. NGAUS Board of Directors 10. The Guard in the Federal Budget 94. NGAUS Areas 12. Resolutions Timeline 96. Area Directors 14. Army Resolutions 98. NGAUS Staff 4 LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTIONS // www.ngaus.org A LETTER FROM OUR CHAIRMAN www.ngaus.org // LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTIONS 5 It is my privilege to present the Fiscal Year 2020 Legislative Resolutions of the National Guard Association of the United States (NGAUS) on behalf of our nearly 45,000 members. Our mission to advocate for the National Guard in Congress has not changed since our formation in 1878. However, the National Guard and NGAUS’ priorities change as the global threat environment changes. The National Guard is essential to the defense of our nation now, more than ever, as homeland defense and great power competition return to the forefront of the National Defense Strategy. Secretary of Defense James N. Mattis said during this year’s NGAUS General Conference and Exhibition in New Orleans, “Everything we do must contribute to increased lethality. So we need you, my fine young National Guardsmen, at the top of your game. Lethality begins when we are physically, mentally, and spiritually fit to be evaluated by the most exacting auditor on earth. And that auditor is war.” Enhanced lethality means maximum readiness. National Guard readiness includes current and proportional fielding of new equipment and weapons platforms to units that are in line with Army and Air Force requirements, legacy platform modernization and recapitalization to ensure safety and reliability, as well Major General as accessibility to robust health care to ensure continuity of care, and deployability for National Guard Donald Dunbar personnel.