Security Strip for a Security Paper for Currency & Banknotes
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Patentamt Europaisches || || 1 1| || || || 1 1| || || || || || (19) J European Patent Office Office europeen des brevets (1 1 ) EP 0 536 855 B1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION (45) Date of publicationation and mention (51) Int. CI.6: B42D 15/00, B41M3/14 of the grant of the patent: 11.12.1 996 Bulletin 1 996/50 (21) Application number: 92203692.6 (22) Date of filing: 24.02.1987 (54) Security strip for a security paper for currency & banknotes Sicherheitsstreifen fur ein Sicherheitspapier fur Wertpapiere und Banknoten Ruban de securite pour papier de securite pour papiers fiduciaires et billets de banque (84) Designated Contracting States: (74) Representative: Williams, John Francis et al CH DE FR GB IT LI NL SE WILLIAMS, POWELL & ASSOCIATES 34 Tavistock Street (43) Date of publication of application: London WC2E 7PB (GB) 14.04.1993 Bulletin 1993/15 (56) References cited: (62) Application number of the earlier application in EP-A- 0 070 172 EP-A- 01 05 969 accordance with Art. 76 EPC: 87102596.1 EP-A- 0 181 770 DE-A- 1 446 851 GB-A- 237 828 GB-A- 1 486 079 (73) Proprietor: CRANE &CO.INC. GB-A-2103 669 US-A-4 552 617 Dalton Massachusetts 01226 (US) US-A-4 652 015 (72) Inventor: Crane, Timothy T. • DATABASE WPIL Week 8446, Derwent Windsor, Massachusetts 01226 (US) Publications Ltd., London, GB; AN 84282244 & AU-A-1 793 283 (AQUINO) • GB-A-J19963 (JULES GERNAERT) CO LO LO CO CO CO Note: Within nine months from the publication of the mention of the grant of the European patent, give LO any person may notice to the European Patent Office of opposition to the European patent granted. Notice of opposition shall be filed in o a written reasoned statement. It shall not be deemed to have been filed until the opposition fee has been paid. (Art. Q_ 99(1) European Patent Convention). LU Printed by Rank Xerox (UK) Business Services 2.13.9/3.4 1 EP 0 536 855 B1 2 Description to be visually accessed from one side of the security paper. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION All the aforementioned methods for incorporating security devices within the security paper allow for visi- Methods are currently available for deploying a thin s ble access to the presence of the security device by strip of clear material such as polyester film within paper means of the unaided eye. The Williams approach could during the papermaking process. If the film is used as a lead an observer to believe that a blurred line on the sur- security thread and is first micro-printed prior to dispen- face of the security paper, for example, is a sufficient sation during the papermaking process, the resulting indication of authenticity without requiring that the paper paper then contains a legible code that is legible in w be held up to transmitted light for actual verification. The transmitted light. With papers of the substance and earlier security device also caused the security paper to thickness used for currency and banknotes, the code is exhibit an increased thickness in the vicinity of the also visible under reflected light. The purpose of printed device compared to the thickness of the paper itself. security threads is to deter a potential forger since the This increased thickness or "bulge" line can be dupli- coded indicia on the thread is buried within the paper is cated by a skilled forger to lead the observer to believe and cannot be duplicated by surface printing tech- that a security device is actually present, without further niques. The authenticity of such a document can be examination. readily verified by comparing the appearance of the When an unprinted metallized plastic thread such security thread under reflected light against its appear- as described within the aforementioned patent to Wil- ance in transmitted light. It is the reflected light appear- 20 liams is used as a security thread, the optical and elec- ance that is most relied upon by the public when trical properties of the thread can be used for automatic handling currency and banknotes in general circulation. verification by determining optical variations across the The reflected light appearance, however, does not paper as well as by standard electronic metal detection directly reveal the presence of the printing that is com- techniques. It has been determined, however, that the pletely legible in transmitted light. In fact, the nondistinct 25 optical properties of such a metallized thread can be muted line of the security thread that is conspicuous at duplicated to some extent by means of a pale but the surface of the currency and banknotes becomes the opaque line printed on the surface of the paper in the distinctive feature in the eyes of the general public. vicinity of where the security thread would be located. A The inclusion of the security device within the body dull pencil line may also fool the unskilled observer as to of the security paper now requires sophisticated paper- 30 the presence of a buried security thread. making machinery which is not available to forgers. One For reliable verification, the currency or banknote method of incorporating the security device is described must be held up to a light source to reveal the coded within U.S. patent 3,880,706 to Williams, wherein the indicia on the security thread that make a security security device is sandwiched between two layers of thread virtually impossible to forge. The nondistinctive formed paper midway during the papermaking process. 35 line that is the visible surface manifestation of the An opaque item embedded within security paper is embedded security thread under reflected light is easily also described as early as the issue dates of U.S. pat- simulated also by a variety of printing processes. ents 210,089; 964,014; and 1,929,828. It is believed Earlier attempts at printing on plastic strips and that the two ply insertion approach disclosed within embedding the strips within the paper have not hereto- these patents deterred feasibility for use within currency 40 fore proved feasible since the ink used to form the paper, since the two ply papers could conceivably be printed information that was legible under transmitted replicated by laminating thin sheets of counterfeit paper light also allowed the information to become legible without requiring a sophisticated papermaking under reflected light. The public could then rely upon the machine. The simplicity in the configuration and design presence of the printed matter solely under reflected of the proposed security items were such that a forger 45 light, which printing is easily replicated by counterfeit could replicate them without a great deal of skill or means. expense. One way to ensure that the public does not come to Another method of incorporating the security device rely on such an easily simulated security thread charac- within the security paper comprises pressing the device teristic is to manufacture currency and banknote paper within the wet paper fibers while the fibers are unconsol- so containing a security thread that is virtually invisible idated and pliable as taught by U.S. patent 4,534,398 to under reflected light with no manifestation on the sur- Timothy Crane, which patent is incorporated herein for face of the currency or banknote that such a security purposes of reference. In this method the security thread is present. This two-fold test of authentication, device is visible from one surface of the security paper namely, legible under transmitted light and invisible for visual verification. 55 under reflected light, has heretofore not been met by U.S. patent 4,552,617 also in the name of Timothy any of the earlier noted devices. Crane describes a method of incorporating a security US-A-4,552,61 7 discloses a system for embedding device within security paper by dissolving the security into paper security indicia, which includes providing a device carrier substrate and allowing the security device soluble carrier substrate in strip form with micro-coded 2 3 EP 0 536 855 B1 4 information. The strip is inserted into the fibres used for type papermaking machine adapted for inserting forming paper during the paper-making process, such the security device from a continuous strip within that the strip dissolves to leave the micro-coded infor- the paper fibers; mation intact as security indicia within the paper. The Figure 4 is an enlarged top perspective view of a micro-printed indicia may be formed from ink, fluores- 5 part of an aluminized polyester security device strip cent pigments, dyes or metallised and metal oxide depicted in Figures 2 and 3 after a clear protective coated films. overcoat has been applied to the aluminized print; EP-A-0,181,770 discloses an optical interference Figure 5 is a top perspective view of an aluminized authenticating device which includes a polyester film polyester security device film with a clear protective substrate and at least two coatings thereon, one being 10 overcoat applied to the area where indicia is to be radiation absorbing so as to be selectively removed by retained and after an etchant solution has been an infrared laser beam after being deposited on the sub- applied producing a soluble aluminum salt in the strate by a method of vapour deposition. unprotected area; GB-A-2, 103,669 discloses a security device in the Figure 6 is a top perspective view of the security form of a diffractor grating structure applied to a dissolv- 15 device film of Figure 5 after the etchant solution has able carrier web. been applied and the soluble aluminum salt has The purpose of this invention therefore, is to pro- been removed; and vide a method for incorporating a security thread bear- Figure 7 is a side sectional view of the security ing printed information within security paper that is device of Figure 6 embedded within paper formed easily readable in transmitted light but virtually undetec- 20 within the papermaking machines depicted in Fig- table when it is viewed under reflected light.