North America Prepared By

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

North America Prepared By August 2017 Keeping ahead of global anti-corruption trends is critical in today’s business markets. The Dorsey Anti-Corruption Digest, which puts global trends at your fingertips, puts you ahead. The deep experience of the Dorsey Anti-Corruption team, drawn from the DOJ, the SEC and years in private practice, will keep you ahead. NORTH AMERICA PREPARED BY: THE UNITED STATES Tom Gorman DOJ Ends Probe into Net1 Partner The Department of Justice (DOJ) ended its probe of Net1 UEPS Technologies, according Zach Davison to SEC filings from the South African-based Associate payment processing company. The company received a declination from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in 2015 Kim Frumkin regarding the same matter, but the DOJ Associate investigation continued until now. The probe started after an African Barclays Chad Richards unit lost a bid and approached the DOJ about possible corruption related to the tender. In Associate December 2012, Net1 disclosed that the SEC, DOJ, and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) were investigating payments to South African government officials to win a contract with that country’s Social Security Agency. The investigation, considered unusual when it was announced as it related to a local issue, involved a South African company, allegedly 1 of 17 bribing South African government officials to undertaken by the Polish Central Anti- win a South African contract. The probe was Corruption Bureau. That probe related to initiated after a South African court agreed the alleged illegal activity by a former IBM Poland tender process was irregular and corrupt, but employee regarding sales to the Polish refused to set aside the tender. government. When the DOJ joined the investigation in 2013, it expanded the probe to Colombian Anti-Corruption Chief conduct in Argentina, Bangladesh, and Arrested For Bribery after Giving Ukraine. Corruption Speech FBI Nominee Wray Tells Senate Luis Gustavo Moreno Rivera, the head of the Trump Organization FCPA Probe national anti-corruption unit in the Colombian Not Off Limits attorney general’s office, was indicted in the U.S. after Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) The Senate Judiciary Committee grilled agents in Miami recorded him agreeing to take President Trump’s FBI Director nominee, bribes. U.S. v. Moreno Rivera et al., Case No. Christopher Wray, on his perception of the 1:17-mj-02885 (C.D. Fla.) (Filed June 27, Bureau’s enforcement duties. Specifically, 2017). Ironically, Mr. Moreno Rivera was in Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D. Cal.), who serves Miami to give an anti-corruption presentation as the committee’s ranking member, asked to Internal Revenue Service (IRS) what Mr. Wray would do if the Trump investigators. Mr. Moreno Rivera was charged Organization or family may have violated the with one count of conspiracy to launder money FCPA. Sen. Feinstein referenced a New in order to promote foreign bribery. Yorker magazine article that had raised corruption questions about the Trump According to prosecutors, Mr. Moreno Rivera organization’s ventures in Azerbaijan. Mr. agreed to take $132,000 in cash to discredit a Wray responded that he would follow the facts witness in a case before the IRS. The IRS and law, wherever they might lead: “If the FBI case involved an investigation into a is provided credible evidence suggesting that Colombian governor, Alejandro Lyons Muskus a crime had been committed, I would expect of Córdoba. The governor reportedly agreed to the FBI to investigate appropriately and, if wear a wire in a meeting with Mr. Moreno merited, to support the prosecution of such Rivera in Miami. U.S. DEA agents found some crimes.” Mr. Wray’s FBI nomination passed of the bribe money on Mr. Moreno Rivera and the Senate Judiciary Committee in a 20-0 vote his wife when they were traveling back to on July 20. His nomination is expected to go Colombia, according to the indictment. before the Senate prior to the August recess. Mr. Moreno Rivera was arrested in Colombia UAE Ambassador to the U.S. after Interpol issued a red notice for him. He is being held at La Picota prison in Bogota, Tied to 1MDB Fund Fraud pending his extradition to the U.S. United Arab Emirates (UAE) ambassador to the U.S., Yousef Al Otaiba, received $66 FCPA Probe of IBM Closed million from offshore companies tied to the The SEC and DOJ have closed their four year alleged $4.5 billion fraud involving the investigation into IBM’s transactions in Malaysian state investment fund, the 1MDB Argentina, Bangladesh, Poland, and Ukraine, fund, according to the Wall Street Journal, according to an SEC filing by IBM. The U.S. which cited court and investigative documents. investigation commenced in early 2012 when Leaked emails show meetings between an IBM notified the SEC of an investigation associate of Mr. Otaiba and Jho Low, the Malaysian financier who is at the center of the 2 of 17 alleged 1MDB fund fraud. Mr. Low has been CDM had been working on a consulting connected to a number of illicit purchases, contract for the Da Nang Priority Infrastructure according to U.S. prosecutors. Mr. Otaiba and Investment Project in Vietnam, which was the UAE embassy in Washington declined to financed by the World Bank. While working on comment on the purpose of the transfers. the project, CDM failed to disclose a sub- consulting agreement with a local Vietnamese Former DOJ Compliance company and failed to seek contractually- Counsel Takes to LinkedIn Again required written approval of the agreement, according to the World Bank. Former DOJ compliance counsel Hui Chen The sanction started on June 29 and will run stated in a June 25 LinkedIn post that she until December 28, 2018. CDM’s resolution could no longer work for the Trump agreement also requires the engineering administration. Ms. Chen said she felt it company to adopt a corporate compliance hypocritical to demand compliance from program that is “consistent with the World companies while President Trump stood Bank Group Integrity Compliance Guidelines, accused of conduct she “would not tolerate and fully cooperate with the Bank in advancing seeing in a company.” She also felt limited by its anticorruption work.” DOJ criminal division leadership after they prohibited her from speaking publicly. “This inability to engage was particularly frustrating Peru Dismisses Odebrecht after the release of the Evaluations of Special Counsel amid Corruption Corporate Compliance document, as I Scandal watched almost everyone except me being able to talk about (and often misinterpreting) The Peruvian government has dismissed the my work,” Ms. Chen wrote. special counsel in charge of investigating Odebrecht’s corruption. The change comes Ms. Chen notified the DOJ in mid-May that she amid increasing regional fallout stemming would not renew her contract. She officially from the massive bribery scandal previously ended her work with the DOJ on June 21. Prior reported in the Digest. to leaving government, Ms. Chen had become an outspoken critic of the Trump Justice Minister Marisol Perez said she administration, taking to Twitter to criticize dismissed special attorney Katherine U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ refusal to Ampuero after she blocked Odebrecht’s sale answer certain questions in a recent Senate of its irrigation company. Odebrecht has Intelligence Committee hearing. sought to offload assets in the wake of over $2.5 billion in global criminal penalties after CDM Smith Sanctioned by World agreeing to settle bribery offenses late last Bank after FCPA Settlement year. The decision put thousands of jobs at risk and deprived the Peruvian government of Engineering giant CDM Smith, which settled revenues it could have seized as payment for Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) charges reparations, according to Justice Minister last month as reported in the Digest, was Perez. Some Peruvian lawmakers, as well as “conditionally non-barred” for one and a half Ms. Ampuero, criticized the decision. years by the World Bank for failing to disclose Odebretch’s proposed sale will remain a subcontract on a project in Vietnam. A blocked pending an appeals court’s decision “conditional non-debarment” means that CDM on whether to allow the sale to move forward. can participate in World Bank-financed projects, but only if it meets the conditions of The Odebrecht corruption scandal has continued to reverberate throughout the its negotiated resolution agreement. region. Three fund managers identified the 3 of 17 scandal as risk factors to Latin American Nigerian minister for petroleum resources, by infrastructure investment in recent SEC filings. buying her multimillion dollar properties in The filings noted that the Odebrecht scandal London as well as expensive furnishings and has produced “widespread fallout” in the artwork, according to the complaint. In return, region, with “governments across Latin Aluko and Omokore obtained lucrative America” announcing investigations, fines contracts to finance oil production and and, in certain countries, outright bans on the exploration. This gave them the opportunity to construction firm’s operations. The filings receive a portion of the oil and gas that was concluded that there “may be wider produced. As a result, the Nigerian implications for the Latin American banking businessmen earned more than $1.5 billion sector, as banks exposed to entities affiliated from the sale of crude oil, despite failing to with Odebrecht could suffer loan losses and meet certain obligations in the contracts. The will likely adopt a more cautious stance when duo then used shell companies and other lending to infrastructure concessionaires in the transactions to launder some of the proceeds future.” through the U.S. The government of Peru echoed the warnings The former oil minister also faces a slew of by the fund managers in SEC filings for its international corruption charges in Nigeria bonds: “Peruvian authorities are currently relating to her involvement in siphoning billions conducting several high-profile corruption of dollars from oil deals and state coffers.
Recommended publications
  • Political Corruption in Poland Surdej, Aleksander; Gadowska, Kaja
    www.ssoar.info Political corruption in Poland Surdej, Aleksander; Gadowska, Kaja Arbeitspapier / working paper Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Surdej, A., & Gadowska, K. (2005). Political corruption in Poland. (Arbeitspapiere und Materialien / Forschungsstelle Osteuropa an der Universität Bremen, 65). Bremen: Forschungsstelle Osteuropa an der Universität Bremen. https:// nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-436042 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Deposit-Lizenz (Keine This document is made available under Deposit Licence (No Weiterverbreitung - keine Bearbeitung) zur Verfügung gestellt. Redistribution - no modifications). We grant a non-exclusive, non- Gewährt wird ein nicht exklusives, nicht übertragbares, transferable, individual and limited right to using this document. persönliches und beschränktes Recht auf Nutzung dieses This document is solely intended for your personal, non- Dokuments. Dieses Dokument ist ausschließlich für commercial use. All of the copies of this documents must retain den persönlichen, nicht-kommerziellen Gebrauch bestimmt. all copyright information and other information regarding legal Auf sämtlichen Kopien dieses Dokuments müssen alle protection. You are not allowed to alter this document in any Urheberrechtshinweise und sonstigen Hinweise auf gesetzlichen way, to copy it for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the Schutz beibehalten werden. Sie dürfen dieses Dokument document in public, to perform, distribute or otherwise use the nicht in irgendeiner Weise abändern, noch dürfen Sie document in public. dieses Dokument für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke By using this particular document, you accept the above-stated vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, aufführen, vertreiben oder conditions of use. anderweitig nutzen. Mit der Verwendung dieses Dokuments erkennen Sie die Nutzungsbedingungen an. Forschungsstelle Osteuropa Bremen Arbeitspapiere und Materialien No.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Bribery and Corruption Review June 2018
    ANTI-BRIBERY AND CORRUPTION REVIEW JUNE 2018 CONTENTS Global contacts 3 World Map 4 Foreword 6 Europe, the Middle East and Africa 7 Belgium 8 Czech Republic 11 France 13 Germany 15 Italy 20 Luxembourg 22 Poland 23 Romania 25 Russia 28 Slovak Republic 31 Spain 32 The Netherlands 34 Turkey 36 Ukraine 38 United Arab Emirates 40 United Kingdom 41 The Americas 44 Brazil 45 United States of America 47 Asia Pacific 50 Australia 51 Hong Kong 53 Japan 56 People’s Republic of China 57 Singapore 58 Thailand 62 ANTI-BRIBERY AND CORRUPTION REVIEW GLOBAL CONTACTS EUROPE, THE MIDDLE EAST AND AFRICA Ukraine3 Belgium Sergiy Gryshko +380 44 390 22 19 Sébastien Ryelandt +32 2533 5988 United Arab Emirates Dorothée Vermeiren +32 2533 5063 James Abbott +971 4503 2608 Yana Paulovich +32 2533 5038 Jack Hardman +971 4503 2712 Czech Republic Connor Partos +971 4503 2664 Jan Dobrý +420 22255 5252 United Kingdom France Roger Best +44 20 7006 1640 Thomas Baudesson +33 14405 5443 Luke Tolaini +44 20 7006 4666 Charles-Henri Boeringer +33 14405 2464 Patricia Barratt +44 20 7006 8853 Marc Bailly +33 14405 5312 Zoe Osborne +44 20 7006 8293 Germany Heiner Hugger +49 697199 1283 THE AMERICAS David Pasewaldt +49 697199 1453 Brazil Gerson Raiser +49 697199 1450 Patrick Jackson +55 11 3019 6017 Italy Fernando Zanzarini +55 11 3019 6098 Antonio Golino +39 028063 4509 United States of America Jean-Paule Castagno +39 028063 4317 David DiBari +1 202912 5098 Pasquale Grella +39 028063 4289 Megan Gordon +1 202912 5021 Luxembourg Catherine Ennis +1 202912 5009 Albert Moro +352 485050
    [Show full text]
  • Here a Causal Relationship? Contemporary Economics, 9(1), 45–60
    Bibliography on Corruption and Anticorruption Professor Matthew C. Stephenson Harvard Law School http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/mstephenson/ March 2021 Aaken, A., & Voigt, S. (2011). Do individual disclosure rules for parliamentarians improve government effectiveness? Economics of Governance, 12(4), 301–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-011-0100-8 Aaronson, S. A. (2011a). Does the WTO Help Member States Clean Up? Available at SSRN 1922190. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1922190 Aaronson, S. A. (2011b). Limited partnership: Business, government, civil society, and the public in the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI). Public Administration and Development, 31(1), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.588 Aaronson, S. A., & Abouharb, M. R. (2014). Corruption, Conflicts of Interest and the WTO. In J.-B. Auby, E. Breen, & T. Perroud (Eds.), Corruption and conflicts of interest: A comparative law approach (pp. 183–197). Edward Elgar PubLtd. http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:hul.ebookbatch.GEN_batch:ELGAR01620140507 Abbas Drebee, H., & Azam Abdul-Razak, N. (2020). The Impact of Corruption on Agriculture Sector in Iraq: Econometrics Approach. IOP Conference Series. Earth and Environmental Science, 553(1), 12019-. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/553/1/012019 Abbink, K., Dasgupta, U., Gangadharan, L., & Jain, T. (2014). Letting the briber go free: An experiment on mitigating harassment bribes. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 111(Journal Article), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2013.12.012 Abbink, Klaus. (2004). Staff rotation as an anti-corruption policy: An experimental study. European Journal of Political Economy, 20(4), 887–906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2003.10.008 Abbink, Klaus.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Economy of Corruption
    The Political Economy of Corruption ‘Grand’ corruption, generally used to define corruption amongst the top polit- ical elite, has drawn increasing attention from academics and policy-makers during recent years. Current understanding of the causes and mechanisms of this type of corruption, however, falls short of a full awareness of its importance and consequences. In this volume, leading academics and practitioners analyse the economic and political conditions that allow ‘grand’ corruption to survive. Contributions include: • Case studies of countries that have witnessed flagrant misuse of political powers. • Theoretical papers which present models of corruption and project their possible effects. • Empirical studies which raise research questions and test the theoretical models using insightful methodologies. The studies in this work not only indicate the importance of the economic implications of ‘grand’ corruption, but also provide a framework for under- standing its processes. Academics and policy-makers working in the fields of economics, political science and sociology will find this an illuminating and valuable work. Arvind K. Jain is Associate Professor at Concordia University, Montreal. His current research focuses on corruption and on international financial crises. His past research papers have dealt with corruption, agency theory and the debt crisis, capital flight, international lending decisions of banks, oligopolistic behaviour in banking, foreign debt and foreign trade in devel- oping countries, impact of culture on saving behaviour and commodity futures markets. He has previously written two books and edited a volume entitled Economics of Corruption. Routledge Contemporary Economic Policy Issues Series editor: Kanhaya Gupta This series is dedicated to new works that focus directly on contemporary economic policy issues.
    [Show full text]
  • September 2000 Public Disclosure Authorized
    20925 September 2000 Public Disclosure Authorized ANTICORRUPTION IN Public Disclosure Authorized RANSITION A Contribution to the Policy Debate Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized A W 0 R L D F R EE 0 F P 0 V E R T Y I Anticorruption in Transition A Contribution to the Policy Debate The World Bank Washington, D.C. Copyright © 2000 THE WORLDBANK 1818 H Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20433, USA All rights reserved Manufactured in the United States of America First printing September 2000 1 2 3 4 03 02 01 00 The opinions expressed in this report do not necessarily represent the views of the World Bank or its member governments. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility whatsoever for any consequence of their use. The material in this publication is copyrighted. Requests for permission to reproduce portions of it should be sent to the Office of the Publisher at the address shown in the copyright notice above. The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally give permission promptly and, when the reproduction is for noncommercial purposes, without asking a fee. Permission to copy portions for classroom use is granted through the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., Suite 910, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, Massachusetts 01923, USA. ISBN 0-8213-4802-7 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data hasbeen appliedfor. TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword........................................................................ vii Acknowledgments ........................................................................ ix Abbreviations ........................................................................ xi Executive Summary ........................................................................ xiii Chapter 1 The Level and Pattern of Corruption in the Transition Countries...............................
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Corruption Specialisation of Prosecutors in Selected European Countries
    Anti-Corruption Division Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs ACN Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Anti-Corruption Network 2, rue André-Pascal, 75775 Paris Cedex 16, France for Eastern Europe and Central Asia Phone: +33(0)1 45241319, Fax: +33(0)1 44306307, E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.oecd.org/corruption/acn ANTI-CORRUPTION SPECIALISATION OF PROSECUTORS IN SELECTED EUROPEAN COUNTRIES Working Paper September 2011 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development ANTI-CORRUPTION NETWORK FOR EASTERN EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA The Anti-Corruption Network for Eastern Europe and Central Asia (ACN) was established in 1998 to support its members in their fight against corruption by providing a regional forum for promotion of anti- corruption activities, exchange of information, elaboration of best practices and donor coordination. ACN is open for countries in Central, Eastern and South Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia. The OECD and EU members, international organisations, multilateral development banks, civil society and business associations also participate in its activities. The ACN Secretariat is based at the OECD Anti-Corruption Division. The Secretariat is guided by the ACN Steering Group and reports to the OECD Working Group on Bribery. © OECD 2011 You can copy, download or print OECD content for your own use, and you can include excerpts from OECD publications, databases and multimedia products in your own documents, presentations, blogs, websites and teaching materials, provided that suitable acknowledgment of OECD as source and copyright owner is given. All requests for public or commercial use and translation rights should be submitted to [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Charting a New Path for Poland Or Turning Its Back on More Than a Quarter Century of Progress? Archives of Business Research, 5(2), 20-30
    Archives of Business Research – Vol.5, No.2 Publication Date: February. 25, 2017 DOI: 10.14738/abr.52.2699. Hunter, R. J. (2017). Charting a New Path for Poland or Turning Its Back On More Than a Quarter Century of Progress? Archives of Business Research, 5(2), 20-30 Charting a New Path for Poland or Turning Its Back On More Than a Quarter Century of Progress? Richard J. Hunter, Jr. Professor of Legal Studies Seton Hall University ABSTRACT The paper analyzes the Morawiecki Plan for the Polish economy in light of its emphasis on encouraging domestic, rather than foreign, development in Poland. It discusses the critique of the current government relating to foreign ownership of assets in Poland and what the government intends to do about reversing this trend from both historical and practical perspectives. The paper includes both positive and negative assessments of these proposed changes in policy and emphasis. KEYWORDS: Balcerowicz Plan; Foreign Direct Investment; Incentives; Morawiecki Plan INTRODUCTION From the perspective of nearly twenty-eight years, it is now possible to state with certainty that despite a “propaganda of success” trumpeted by adherents to the former system of central planning (also called the command-rationing method or CRM), the economy of Poland had literally imploded by 1988-1989 because of a combination of four interrelated factors, which Hunter and Ryan (2006) have termed the “Grand Failures” of the communist system as it existed in Poland. These factors included: • Failure to create economic value or to improve
    [Show full text]
  • Read the Full Survey
    Jones Day Table of Contents GLOSSARY ....................................................................................................................................................................... iii Africa ..................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Kenya ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 Mozambique ........................................................................................................................................... 9 South Africa .......................................................................................................................................... 12 Asia Pacific .......................................................................................................................................................... 17 Australia ................................................................................................................................................ 17 China ..................................................................................................................................................... 21 Hong Kong ............................................................................................................................................ 26 India .....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ANTI-CORRUPTION REGULATION SURVEY of 41 COUNTRIES 2017-2018 Jones Day
    ANTI-CORRUPTION REGULATION SURVEY OF 41 COUNTRIES 2017-2018 Jones Day Table of Contents GLOSSARY ................................................................................................................................................ iii Africa .............................................................................................................................................. 1 Kenya .................................................................................................................................. 1 Mozambique ...................................................................................................................... 8 South Africa ..................................................................................................................... 11 Asia Pacific ................................................................................................................................... 16 Australia ........................................................................................................................... 16 China ................................................................................................................................ 20 Hong Kong ....................................................................................................................... 24 Japan ................................................................................................................................ 28 South Korea ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Typology of Post-Communist Corruption Rasma Karklins
    CAPITALISM, CORRUPTION, AND SOMETHING ELSE Typology of Post-Communist Corruption Rasma Karklins TRIKE up a conversation with anyone in the post- Corruption takes many forms, communist region and the topic of governmental and all of them distort the Scorruption will invariably come up. People are convinced that corruption is widespread, and they all workings of the political have stories to tell, either from their own experience or heard from others, including the media. They are frus- system. trated because so little is being done about the situa- tion, and because they feel helpless and see themselves as being played for fools. Many cynically believe that in order to get along they have to “play the game”— that “the System” compels them to do so. But what “sys- tem” exactly? What are the proto-typical structures and processes involved in post-communist corruption, and how are others drawn in? Why is corruption so perva- sive and hard to fight?1 One important reason is that post-communist corrup- tion has many sub-types, some of which are institution- alized. Next to petty acts like bribing traffic cops or building inspectors, there is the grand corruption of exercising illicit influence on political decisions at the highest level of government. Post-communist corrup- tion also includes the stripping of public assets by self- serving officials who, at times, transform entire public institutions into private fiefdoms. While the extent and specific mix of corrupt practices differ from one post- communist country to another, their basic features are similar across the region.2 This suggests that corruption is rooted in systemic features of the preceding regimes and the transition from them.
    [Show full text]
  • Poland: Phase 2
    Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs POLAND: PHASE 2 REPORT ON THE APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTION ON COMBATING BRIBERY OF FOREIGN PUBLIC OFFICIALS IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS AND THE 1997 REVISED RECOMMENDATION ON COMBATING BRIBERY IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS This report was approved and adopted by the Working Group on Bribery in International Business Transactions on 18 January 2007. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................ 5 A. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 6 1. On-Site Visit ..................................................................................................................................... 6 2. General Observations........................................................................................................................ 7 a. Economic system .............................................................................................................................. 7 b. Political and legal framework ........................................................................................................... 8 c. Implementation of the Convention and Revised Recommendation.................................................. 8 d. Cases involving the bribery of foreign public officials....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Brazil: Phase 2
    Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs BRAZIL: PHASE 2 REPORT ON THE APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTION ON COMBATING BRIBERY OF FOREIGN PUBLIC OFFICIALS IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS AND THE 1997 RECOMMENDATION ON COMBATING BRIBERY IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS This report was approved and adopted by the Working Group on Bribery in International Business Transactions on 7 December 2007. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... 4 A. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 5 1. On-Site Visit .......................................................................................................................... 5 2. General Observations ............................................................................................................ 6 a. Economic system ........................................................................................................... 6 b. Political and legal framework ........................................................................................ 7 c. Implementation of the Convention and Revised Recommendation ............................... 7 d. Corruption overview ...................................................................................................... 8 e. Cases involving the bribery of foreign public officials ................................................
    [Show full text]