DOCSLIB.ORG

GEF Country Portfolio Evaluation: the Philippines (1992–2007)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
GEF Country Portfolio Evaluation: the Philippines (1992–2007) Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized GEF Country Portfolio Evaluation: Portfolio GEF Country The Philippines(1992–2007) The MARCH 2008 Global Environment Facility Evaluation Office GEF Country Portfolio Evaluation: The Philippines (1992–2007) March 2008 (The main findings and recommendations of this evaluation were presented to the GEF Council in June 2007.) Evaluation Report No. 36 © 2008 Global Environment Facility Evaluation Office 1818 H Street, NW Washington, DC 20433 Internet: www.gefeo.org Email: [email protected] All rights reserved. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the GEF Council or the governments they represent. The GEF Evaluation Office does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denomi- nations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of the GEF concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this work is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The GEF encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission promptly. ISBN 10: 1-933992-08-5 ISBN-13: 978-1-933992-08-2 Credits Director of the GEF Evaluation Office: Robert D. van den Berg Task Manager: Claudio R. Volonté, Chief Evaluation Officer, GEF Evaluation Office Evaluation Team: Arne Jensen and Aage Jorgensen, NORDECO Editing and design: Nita Congress Printing: Graphic Communications Cover photo: Sunrise in Bohol, by Anna Viggh, GEF Evaluation Office Evaluation Report No. 36 A FREE PUBLICATION Contents Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................... vi Foreword ...................................................................................................................................... vii Acknowledgments .................................................................................................................... viii 1. Main Conclusions and Recommendations ........................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Conclusions ...................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Recommendations .......................................................................................................................................... 7 1.4 Observations .................................................................................................................................................... 9 Notes .......................................................................................................................................................................... 9 2. Description of the Evaluation ............................................................................................... 10 2.1 Background .................................................................................................................................................... 10 2.2 Objectives ....................................................................................................................................................... 11 2.3 Key Questions ............................................................................................................................................... 12 2.4 Focus and Limitations ................................................................................................................................. 12 2.5 Methodology.................................................................................................................................................. 13 Notes ........................................................................................................................................................................ 14 3. Context of the Evaluation ..................................................................................................... 15 3.1 General Description ..................................................................................................................................... 15 3.2 Environmental Resources in Key GEF Support Areas......................................................................... 16 3.3 The Environmental Legal and Policy Framework ................................................................................ 20 Notes ........................................................................................................................................................................ 25 4. Activities Funded by the GEF in the Philippines ................................................................. 26 4.1 Activities Considered in the Evaluation .................................................................................................. 27 4.2 Evolution of GEF Funding to the Philippines ........................................................................................ 33 Note .......................................................................................................................................................................... 34 5. Results of GEF Support to the Philippines .......................................................................... 35 5.1 Global Environmental Impacts ................................................................................................................. 35 iii 5.2 Catalytic and Replication Effects .............................................................................................................. 44 5.3 Capacity Building and Institutional Sustainability ............................................................................... 45 Notes ....................................................................................................................................................................... 46 6. Relevance of GEF Support to the Philippines ..................................................................... 47 6.1 Relevance to Country’s Sustainable Development Agenda and Environmental Priorities......... 47 6.2 Relevance to Country’s Development Needs and Challenges ........................................................... 49 6.3 Relevance to National Action Plans within GEF Focal Areas ............................................................ 50 6.4 Relevance to Global Environmental Indicators ..................................................................................... 51 6.5 Relevance of the GEF Portfolio to Other Global and National Organizations .............................. 52 Note .......................................................................................................................................................................... 52 7. Efficiency of GEF-Supported Activities in the Philippines ................................................. 54 7.1 Time and Effort in Project Development and Implementation ........................................................ 54 7.2 Stakeholder Roles and Responsibilities in Project Implementation ................................................. 56 7.3 The GEF Focal Point Mechanism in the Philippines ........................................................................... 58 7.4 Lessons Learned across GEF Projects ..................................................................................................... 60 7.5 Synergies among GEF Stakeholders and Projects ................................................................................. 61 Notes ........................................................................................................................................................................ 61 Annexes A. Terms of Reference ......................................................................................................................................... 63 B. Evaluation Matrix ............................................................................................................................................ 70 C. GEF-Funded Activities in the Philippines ................................................................................................. 72 D. GEF-Funded Activities Not Included in Evaluation ............................................................................... 74 E. People Interviewed and Workshop Participants .................................................................................... 75 F. Literature Reviewed ......................................................................................................................................... 79 G. Global and Local Benefits: Achievements at the Project Level ........................................................... 87 H. ODA to the Philippines, 1991–2005 ......................................................................................................... 96 I. Description and Results of Completed Projects Included in Evaluation ...........................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THE PHILIPPINES, 1942-1944 James Kelly Morningstar, Doctor of History
    ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: WAR AND RESISTANCE: THE PHILIPPINES, 1942-1944 James Kelly Morningstar, Doctor of History, 2018 Dissertation directed by: Professor Jon T. Sumida, History Department What happened in the Philippine Islands between the surrender of Allied forces in May 1942 and MacArthur’s return in October 1944? Existing historiography is fragmentary and incomplete. Memoirs suffer from limited points of view and personal biases. No academic study has examined the Filipino resistance with a critical and interdisciplinary approach. No comprehensive narrative has yet captured the fighting by 260,000 guerrillas in 277 units across the archipelago. This dissertation begins with the political, economic, social and cultural history of Philippine guerrilla warfare. The diverse Islands connected only through kinship networks. The Americans reluctantly held the Islands against rising Japanese imperial interests and Filipino desires for independence and social justice. World War II revealed the inadequacy of MacArthur’s plans to defend the Islands. The General tepidly prepared for guerrilla operations while Filipinos spontaneously rose in armed resistance. After his departure, the chaotic mix of guerrilla groups were left on their own to battle the Japanese and each other. While guerrilla leaders vied for local power, several obtained radios to contact MacArthur and his headquarters sent submarine-delivered agents with supplies and radios that tie these groups into a united framework. MacArthur’s promise to return kept the resistance alive and dependent on the United States. The repercussions for social revolution would be fatal but the Filipinos’ shared sacrifice revitalized national consciousness and created a sense of deserved nationhood. The guerrillas played a key role in enabling MacArthur’s return.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical..Bulletin
    Tech. Tech. Bull. ISSN 0388-$394 Trop. Agr. Res. Center, Center, Japan No. 24 Technical Technical .. Bulletin of of the Tn:>picah Agriculture . Research Center .. No .. 24 1988 CHARACTERISTlCS ANlY GlNESIS OF V(JLCANICASI-I SOILS INTI-IE INTI-IE PHI llPPINES HIRQO OTSUKA, 1¥URELIO A .. BRIONES, NONILONA P. DAQUIADO, and FERNANDO A .. EVANGEUO TROPICAL・. TROPICAL・. AGRfCULTUR 正史 ESEARCH CENTER MlNlSTRY OF ACiRtCUtTUR えFORESτRY AND FISHERIES, JAPAN Tropical Agriculture Research Center Director General: Toshihiro KAJIW ARA Members of the Editorial Board Masanori MIYAKE, Chairman Masashi KOBAYASHI Tatsuzi TAKAHASHI Michio ARARAGI Iwao NISHIYAMA Kiyoto HASEGAWA Michio NOZAKI Editorial Secretary Takaaki ASAI Tropical Agriculture Research Center Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Ohwashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan Technical Bulletin of the Tropical Agriculture Research Center No. 24 CHARACTERISTICS AND GENESIS OF VOLCANIC ASH SOILS IN THE PHILIPPINES Hirao OTSUKA*, Aurelio A. BRIONESS**, Nonilona P. DAQUIADO**, and Fernando A. EVANGELIO** 1988 * Tropical Agriculture Research Center (TARC), Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Japan (Present address: National Institute of Agro­ Environmental Sciences, NIAES, 3-1-1 Kan-nondai, Tsukuba) ** Department of Soil Science, College of Agriculture, University of the Phili­ ppines, Los Banos, Laguna Tropical Agriculture Research Center Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Ohwashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan Printed by Foundation Norin Kosaikai CONTENTS Abstract . 1 Preface . 3 I. Introduction. 5 II. Distribution and morphological characteristics . 10 III. Some physical and chemical properties . 31 IV. Phosphate contents and distribution in Pedons . 62 V. Accumulation and properties of organic matter . 78 VI. Clay mineralogy, dissolution analysis, elementary composition of sand fraction, and soil classification .
    [Show full text]
  • Biographies of Early Scientists in the Philippines
    Biographies of Early Scientists in the Philippines Electronic version of Scientists in the Philippines Vols 1-2 First published by the National Science Development Board, 1976, 1978 Edited by Cymbeline R. Villamin H. Otley Beyer: Father of Philippine Anthropology Science and Technology Information Institute DOST Complex General Santos Avenue Bicutan Taguig Metro Manila Philippines [email protected] Copyright © 2004 by Science and Technology Information Institute About this eBook Biographies of Early Scientists in the Philippines 2004 edition is published in electronic format by the Information Resources and Analysis Division - Science and Technology Information Institute (IRAD-STII). The print versions, edited by Miguel Ma. Varela and Marcelino A. Foronda Jr. were published in 1976 and 1978 by National Science Development Board (NSDB) then under Minister Melecio S. Magno. Minister Magno hoped the book will contribute to the growing body of science literature. NSDB was the forerunner of the present Department of Science and Technology under Secretary Estrella F. Alabastro. In consonance with the mandate of STII to lead in the dissemination of S&T information, this book is produced in digital format. Jose L. Guerrero Director Science and Technology Information Institute (STII) Biographies of Early Scientists in the Philippines Edited by Cymbeline R. Villamin Copyright © 2004 by Science and Technology Information Institute All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any manner without written permission from the Science and Technology Information Institute. Contents Vol. 1 Jose Algue Sanllei (1856-1930) Fernando Calderon (1866-1948) Isabelo Concepcion Paul C. Freer Leon Ma. Guerrero Richard Crittendon McGregor (1871-1936) Elmer D.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Figures Figure 1 Priority Protected Areas for Ecotourism Within Key Biodiversity Areas and Tourism Development Areas
    List of Figures Figure 1 Priority protected areas for ecotourism within Key Biodiversity Areas and Tourism Development Areas Figure 2 Total number of visitors to protected areas and total income generated from 2014 to 2017 List of Tables Table 1 Priority protected areas for ecotourism development within KBAs List of Footnotes 1 NTDP 2016-2022 Tourism Development Clusters and Areas Source: DENR-Biodiversity Management Bureau, 2018 Figure 1. Priority protected areas for ecotourism within Key Biodiversity Areas and Tourism Development Areas 2,000,000 80,000,000.00 1,800,000 70,000,000.00 1,600,000 60,000,000.00 1,400,000 Income 1,200,000 50,000,000.00 1,000,000 40,000,000.00 800,000 30,000,000.00 600,000 Number of visitors of Number 20,000,000.00 400,000 200,000 10,000,000.00 - 0.00 2014 2015 2016 2017 Local Male Local Female Foreign Male Foreign Female Total Income Source: DENR-Biodiversity Management Bureau, 2018 Figure 2. Total number of visitors to protected areas and total income generated from 2014 to 2017. Table 1. Priority protected areas for ecotourism development within KBAs REGION PROTECTED AREA Ecotourism Products/ Activities 1. CAR Mount Pulag National Park Mountain climbing, camping, cultural visit, photography, cloud formation watching 2. CAR Balbalasang Balbalan National Park Hiking, camping 3. Region 1 Kalbario Patapat Natural Park Hiking, caving, biking, diving, camping 4. Region 1 Manleluag Spring Protected Landscape Trekking, hot spring swimming 5. Region 1 Hundred Island National Park Boating, island hopping, 6. Region 2 Batanes Protected Landscape and Village tour, hiking, photography, biking, Seascape caving 7.
    [Show full text]
  • I. Introduction A. Background of the Study the Philippines Used to Have
    I. Introduction A. Background of the Study The Philippines used to have rich tropical rainforests but much has been reduced during the latter half of the twentieth century. The loss of habitats for the many different species can lead to their extinction. Effective action must be taken to preserve the remaining habitats and the species inhabiting them [1]. The Philippines is identified as one of the world’s biologically richest countries. Many endemic species are confined to forest fragments that cover only 7 percent of the original extent of the hotspot [2]. The threat to the specific biodiversity hotspot, the rain forest on Mount Isarog, located in Camarines Sur, is both tragic and severe. Studies in the park demonstrated that 27 species of birds found in the park by Professor Rabor's field team in 1961 had become locally extinct by 1988—20 percent of the total of 135 species. All of these locally extinct species are among the 64 that live (or lived) in lowland rain forest. The Isarog shrew-rat and two other species of mammals that are known only from Mount Isarog are now listed as endangered in the Red Data Book of the IUCN (International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources) [3]. 1 B. Statement of the Problem There is a tremendous urgency to identify factors that result in major impacts on biodiversity, especially in light of rapid species declines and extinctions [4]. The primary threat to biodiversity is habitat alteration and loss caused by destructive resource use, development-related activities and human population pressure [5].
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 Safety in the Philippines
    Table of Contents Chapter 1 Philippine Regions ...................................................................................................................................... Chapter 2 Philippine Visa............................................................................................................................................. Chapter 3 Philippine Culture........................................................................................................................................ Chapter 4 Safety in the Philippines.............................................................................................................................. Chapter 5 Health & Wellness in the Philippines........................................................................................................... Chapter 6 Philippines Transportation........................................................................................................................... Chapter 7 Philippines Dating – Marriage..................................................................................................................... Chapter 8 Making a Living (Working & Investing) .................................................................................................... Chapter 9 Philippine Real Estate.................................................................................................................................. Chapter 10 Retiring in the Philippines...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Unite Republic of Tanzania
    フィリピン環境社会配慮 プロファイル 2011 年 7 月 独立行政法人 国際協力機構（JICA) 審査 CR(5) 11-002 目 次 第 1 章 フィリピン共和国の概況 ............................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 当該国の概況 ................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1.1 位置および地勢 ....................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1.2 気象 .......................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1.3 水象 .......................................................................................................................... 1-3 1.1.4 政治体制・法制度・行政機構 ............................................................................... 1-4 1.2 環境社会配慮関連法規 ................................................................................................. 1-8 1.3 環境社会配慮関連行政組織 ......................................................................................... 1-8 1.3.1 環境天然資源省（DENR） .................................................................................... 1-8 1.3.2 その他の環境行政 ................................................................................................. 1-10 1.4 国際条約批准・適用の概要 ....................................................................................... 1-11 1.5 関連 NGO の動向 ........................................................................................................... 1-12 1.6 援助機関の動向 ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ECOLOGY and CONSERVATION of LARGE-BODIED AVIAN FRUGIVORES of LUZON, PHILIPPINES CARMELA P. ESPAÑOLA a Thesis Submitted in Part
    ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION OF LARGE-BODIED AVIAN FRUGIVORES OF LUZON, PHILIPPINES CARMELA P. ESPAÑOLA A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the Manchester Metropolitan University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Division of Biology and Conservation Ecology School of Science and the Environment Manchester Metropolitan University 2013 ABSTRACT Avian frugivores across Southeast Asia, and in the Philippines in particular, are seriously threatened owing to massive loss of habitat and direct exploitation through hunting and the pet trade. Their declines may have dire consequences for wider ecological processes as many frugivores are also seed dispersers. Conservation programmes in the Philippines are crippled by a lack of knowledge on the status, abundance and ecology of frugivores which extend to other endemic species in the country. This PhD identified factors that influenced frugivore community composition as well as drivers of frugivore distribution across Luzon, the largest island in the Philippines. It also developed cost-effective methods for gathering baseline ecological data to inform conservation measures for frugivores and other little-known species over large geographical areas. This included a way of correcting for the bias caused by non-random transect placement in a study site which is often the case during bird surveys in the tropics. Twenty-five species of pigeons, parrots and hornbills were surveyed using distance sampling along nearly 500 km of line transects at 14 sites across the island of Luzon. I documented surprisingly few reliable disappearances of frugivores from individual forest patches – in fact this and other fieldwork since 2000 has increased the known extent of occurrence of several species.
    [Show full text]
  • Profile on Environmental and Social Considerations in Philippines
    Profile on Environmental and Social Considerations in Philippines September 2011 Japan International Cooperation Agency （JICA) CRE CR(5) 11-008 Table of Contents Chapter 1. General Condition ......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 ................................................................................ General Condition of the Philippines .................................................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1.1 Location and Topography.............................................................................................. 1-1 1.1.2 Meteorology .................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1.3 Hydrology ..................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.1.4 Political Structure, Legal Framework, Administrative Organization ............................ 1-4 1.2 ............................ Regulations and Policies on the Environmental and Social Considerations .................................................................................................................................................. 1-8 1.3 ........... Administrative Organizations related to the Environmental and Social Considerations .................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fifteenth Congress of the Republic of the Philippines
    ,j, 1)~f{:t--, _,,' " " ,,~ FIFTEENTH CONGRESS OF THE ) REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES ) First Regular Session ) SENATE S.B. No. 1356 Introduced by Senator Loren Legarda EXPLANATORY NOTE This bill seeks to declare the Mount Isarog Natural Park in the province of Camarines Sur a special ecological tourism zone to promote and develop the area as a tourist destination for domestic and international tourists while protecting its natural resources and diverse flora and fauna species. Mount Isarog is a potentially active stratovolcano with a 1,97 kilometer elevation and 32.5 kilometer base diameter. In July 20, 1938, President Manuel L. Quezon signed Act 293 establishing Mount Isarog as a national park, which has a land area of 10,112 hectare and area. The Park covers 23 barangays under the , geographical jurisdiction of the municipalities of Tinambac, Calabanga, Pili, Ocampo, Tigaon and Goa and the city of Naga. It is one of the eight protected areas supported by the National Integrated Protected Areas Programme, which receives special funding from the European Commission. The national park houses 143 different species of birds and other animals such as monkeys, bats and wild cats. The waterfalls nestled in the park and the scenic hike to the peak makes it an idyllic tourist destination. Because of its rich environment, it is a prime educational and recreational area for locals and foreigners. Because of the increase in tourist traffic and impending developments, the Park is experiencing changes that may not be environmentally suitable. This bill addresses the need to promote, develop and protect the national park through the creation of the Ecological tourism office that will over3ee the development of the area as an environment friendly tourist destination.
    [Show full text]
  • CBD Second National Report
    Please provide the following details on the origin of this report Contracting Party PHILIPPINES National Focal Point Full name of the institution: Protected Areas and Wildlife Bureau Department of Environment and Natural Resources Name and title of contact Wilfrido S. Pollisco officer: Director Mailing address: Ninoy Aquino Parks and Wildlife Nature Center, Quezon Avenue, Quezon City, Philippines Telephone: (63)(2) 924-6031 Fax: (63)(2) 924-0109 E-mail: [email protected] Contact officer for national report (if different) Full name of the institution: Name and title of contact officer: Mailing address: Telephone: Fax: E-mail: Submission Signature of officer responsible for submitting national report: Date of submission: 1 Please provide summary information on the process by which this report has been prepared, including information on the types of stakeholders who have been actively involved in its preparation and on material which was used as a basis for the report The Second Philippine National Report to the CBD went through the tedious preparation process consisting of research, survey and interviews, meetings, workshops, and several levels of public consultation. Below are the details of said process: 1. Review of CBD Guidelines for the National Report Preparation and the National Reporting Format The CBD Guidelines for the Preparation of the Second National Report to the CBD was reviewed and modified to suit national processes. The format for the National Report has also been reviewed and taken into account in the preparation of the data gathering instruments and workshop/consultation designs. 2. Review of relevant national documents Relevant key national documents were also reviewed including the National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (NBSAP), Philippine Agenda 21 (PA 21), Medium Term Philippine Development Plan (MTPDP), among others.
    [Show full text]
  • Ruedas Et Al
    Luis A. Ruedas, John R. Demboski, and Rogelio V. Sison Abstract. -Morphological variation in twenty-four characters of the skull, eight wing bones, and five characters of external morphology, as well as eco­ logical data, are exa.mined in the pteropodid bat, Otopteropus cartilagonodus, heretofore only known from six specimens. This study examines 0. cartila­ gonodus from three populations: Zambales Mountains (n = 38), Mount Isarog (n = 46), and Isabela Province (n = 1). In the Zambales population, marked sexual dimorphism was found in five cranial characters associated with the feeding apparatus, as well as in overall length. Only two characters differed between sexes in the Mount Isarog population. The Zambales and Mount Isarog populations differed significantly in 21 out of 3 7 mensural characters, as well as in reproductive timing and embryonic development. From the segregation of sexes along an elevational gradient in the Zambales population, it is hy­ pothesized that bats of this population may reduce intersexual competition by displaying distinct trophic and habitat preferences. This pattern of altitudinal segregation was not as marked in the Mount lsarog population. The structured, geographically and morphologically cohesive populations of 0. cartilagonodus represent an ideal organism for elucidation ofzoogeographic relationships among the different regio.ns of the island of Luzon. The pteropodid bat fauna of the Philip­ timing and early development of this spe­ pines currently is known to comprise twen­ cies based on a sample of seven males and ty-four species in 15 genera (Heaney et al. twenty-two females from Mount Isarog, 1987, Hea.ney 1991 , Ingle & Heaney 1992). southern Luzon Island.
    [Show full text]