DOCSLIB.ORG

Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 Draft Environmental Impact Statement/ Environmental Impact Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 Draft Environmental Impact Statement/ Environmental Impact Report Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 Draft Environmental Impact Statement/ Environmental Impact Report APPENDIX Y CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM State Clearinghouse Number: 2010011062 Cultural Resources Technical Memorandum February 6, 2012 Prepared for Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority One Gateway Plaza Los Angeles, CA 90012 State Clearinghouse Number: 2010011062 Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 Cultural Resources Technical Memorandum This technical memorandum was prepared by: ICF International 811 West Seventh Street Suite 800 Los Angeles, CA 90017 for: CDM 523 West Sixth Street Suite 400 Los Angeles, CA 90014 Revision 5 Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 Cultural Resources Technical Memorandum TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Summary ................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 6 2.1 No Build Alternative ........................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Transportation System Management (TSM) Alternative ................................................................. 8 2.3 State Route 60 (SR 60) Light Rail Transit (LRT) Alternative ............................................................. 9 2.3.1 Operating Hours and Frequency ................................................................................................................ 9 2.3.2 Proposed Stations....................................................................................................................................... 9 2.3.3 Maintenance Yard ..................................................................................................................................... 11 2.4 Washington Boulevard LRT Alternative .......................................................................................... 11 2.4.1 Proposed Stations..................................................................................................................................... 13 2.4.2 Maintenance Yard ..................................................................................................................................... 13 3.0 Methodology For Impact Evaluation ................................................................................................... 15 3.1 Regulatory Framework ..................................................................................................................... 15 3.1.1 Federal ...................................................................................................................................................... 15 3.1.1.1 National Environmental Policy Act ................................................................................... 16 3.1.1.2 Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act .................................................... 16 3.1.1.3 Antiquities Act ................................................................................................................... 17 3.1.1.4 The Archaeological Resources Protection Act .................................................................. 17 3.1.1.5 The American Indian Religious Freedom Act................................................................... 17 3.1.1.6 Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966 ....................................... 18 3.1.1.7 The Archaeological and Historic Preservation Act ........................................................... 18 3.1.1.8 Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act............................................... 18 3.1.2 State .......................................................................................................................................................... 18 3.1.2.1 California Environmental Quality Act ............................................................................... 18 3.1.2.2 California Public Resource Code 5097 .............................................................................. 19 3.1.2.3 Paleontological Regulatory Setting ................................................................................... 19 3.1.2.4 CEQA ................................................................................................................................. 20 3.1.2.5 State CEQA Guidelines Sec. 15064.5(a)(3J ...................................................................... 20 3.1.3 Local .......................................................................................................................................................... 20 3.1.3.1 City of Whittier ................................................................................................................... 20 Page i Revision 5 Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 Cultural Resources Technical Memorandum 3.2 Thresholds of Significance ............................................................................................................... 21 3.2.1 Federal ...................................................................................................................................................... 21 3.2.1.1 National Register of Historic Places ................................................................................. 21 3.2.1.2 Federal Impact Criteria ...................................................................................................... 22 3.2.2 State .......................................................................................................................................................... 23 3.2.2.1 CEQA Regulations (Section 15064.5) ............................................................................... 23 3.2.2.2 California Register of Historical Resources ...................................................................... 23 3.2.2.3 Public Resources Code 21083.2 ........................................................................................ 24 3.2.2.4 State Impact Criteria ......................................................................................................... 25 3.3 Area of Potential Effects ................................................................................................................... 25 3.4 Methodology .................................................................................................................................... 26 3.4.1 Identify Consulting and Interested Parties ................................................................................................ 26 3.4.1.1 Native American Groups and Individuals ........................................................................ 26 3.4.2 Identify Potential Historic Properties ........................................................................................................ 29 3.4.2.1 Federal ............................................................................................................................... 30 3.4.2.2 State ................................................................................................................................... 32 3.4.2.3 Paleontological Resources ................................................................................................ 33 4.0 Affected Environment ........................................................................................................................... 34 4.1 Consulting and Interested Parties ................................................................................................... 34 4.2 Identify Potential Historic Properties .............................................................................................. 35 4.2.1 Records Search ......................................................................................................................................... 35 4.2.2 Field Survey ............................................................................................................................................... 38 4.2.2.1 Historic and Architectural Resources ............................................................................... 38 4.2.2.2 Archaeological Properties ................................................................................................. 39 4.2.2.3 Paleontological Review ...................................................................................................... 39 4.3 Historic Context ............................................................................................................................... 41 4.3.1 Introduction: Definition of the Project Area .............................................................................................. 41 4.3.2 Prehistoric Overview of the Project Area .................................................................................................. 41 4.3.3 Historic Overview of the Project Area ....................................................................................................... 42 4.3.4 Agricultural Land Uses in the Project Area ............................................................................................... 44 4.3.5 Residential and Industrial Development of the Project Area ...................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Los Angeles County – California
    AZUSA CITY LOS ANGELES COUNTY CALIFORNIA, U. S. A. Azusa, California Azusa, California Azusa is a city in the San Gabriel Valley, at the foot of the San Gabriel Azusa es una ciudad en el valle de San Gabriel, al pie de las montañas de Mountains in Los Angeles County, California, United States. San Gabriel en el condado de Los Ángeles, California, Estados Unidos. The A on the San Gabriel Mountains represents the city of Azusa, and La A en las montañas de San Gabriel representa la ciudad de Azusa, y se can be seen within a 30-mile radius. The population was 46,361 at the 2010 puede ver dentro de un radio de 30 millas. La población era de 46,361 census, up from 44,712 at the 2000 census. Azusa is located along historic habitantes en el censo de 2010, frente a 44.712 en el censo de 2000. Azusa se Route 66, which passes through the city on Foothill Boulevard and Alosta encuentra a lo largo de la histórica Ruta 66, que pasa por la ciudad en Foothill Avenue. Boulevard y Alosta Avenue. Contents Contenido 1. History 1. Historia 2. Geography 2. Geografía 2.1 Climate 2.1 Clima 3. Demographics 3. Demografía 3.1 2010 3.1 2010 3.2 2000 3.2 2000 4. Economy 4. economía 5. Superfundsite 5. Superfondo 6. Government and infrastructure 6. Gobierno e infraestructura 7. Education 7. educación 7.1 Public Schools 7.1 Escuelas públicas 7.2 Private Schools. 7.2 Escuelas privadas. 8. Transportation 8. Transporte 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Carmel Canine Sports Center Project Environmental Impact Report (PLN13052)
    Proposal to Prepare the Carmel Canine Sports Center Project Environmental Impact Report (PLN13052) Prepared by: Prepared for: AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. Monterey County 104 West Anapamu Street, Suite 204A RMA – Planning Department Santa Barbara, California, 93101 168 West Alisal Street, 2nd Floor Phone (805) 962-0992 Fax (805) 966-1706 Salinas, California, 93901 amec.com June 13, 2014 2 | P a g e June 13, 2014 Mr. Steve Mason, Associate Planner RMA – Planning Department County of Monterey 168 West Alisal Street, 2nd Floor Salinas, CA 93901-2439 Subject: Proposal to Prepare an Environmental Impact Report for the Carmel Canine Sports Center Project – PLN130352 Dear Mr. Mason: AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. (AMEC) is pleased to provide the attached revised proposal to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Carmel Canine Sports Center project. AMEC has assembled a strong team with directly relevant experience for this type of project. Highlights of our team’s capabilities and strengths include: . A Project Manager with substantial experience in environmental review and permitting of controversial projects in jurisdictions with high constituency involvement, including current management of a Project EIR in the Del Monte Forest Planning Area of Monterey County. A team with substantial experience preparing EIRs addressing controversial and complex development projects, including innovative approaches to water resource management, habitat and sensitive species compliance, and noise and traffic mitigation. A team with in-depth knowledge of federal, state, and local regulatory standards, processes, and requirements. AMEC’s team would conduct work from our Santa Barbara and San Francisco offices, while Central Coast Transportation Consulting, AMEC’s subconsultant for traffic analysis, would be based in Morro Bay.
    [Show full text]
  • I- ('A. Minor Professor
    AMERICAN ARTILLERY IN THE MEXICAN WAR 1846-18^7 APPROVEDj Major Profes&ot //I- ('a. Minor Professor of the Department of History / cr*- Dean of the Graduate School AMERICAN ARTILLERY IN THE KEXICAN WAR 18^6-18^7 THESIS Presented, to the Graduate Council of the North Texas State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS By Lester R. Dillon Jr., B. A. Denton, Texas Kay, 1969 TABLE OF CONTENTS Fage LIST OF TABLES iv LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS v Chapter I. PRELUDE TO CONFLICT 1 II. CANNON AND CANNONEERS 1^ III. ARMY OF OCCUPATION 33 IV. THE HEARTLAND 60 V. ARTILLERY AND VICTORY 9° APPENDIX 102 BIBLIOGRAPHY 105 lii LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Organization of Scott's Army, March 18^7. ... 63 II. Organization of Scott's Army, August 18^7 ... 71 i v LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Figure Page 1. Theater of Operations 3 2. Field Cannon 16 3. Cannon Types and. Trajectories 19 Field Cannon and Carriage. , 21 5. Siege Cannon and Carriage . 21 6. Caisson and Limber 2^ 7. Tangent Scale 25 8. Gunner's Quadrant 25 9. Ammunition Types 28 10. Fort Brown to Point Isabel 35 11. Battle of Palo Alto. 38 12. Battle of Eecaca de la Palraa ^3 13. Battle of I-ionterey ^7 1^. Battle of Buena Vista 53 15. Siege of Vera Cruz 61 16. Vera Cruz to Mexico 66 17. Battle of Cerro Gordo . 68 18. Battle of Contreras, 7^ 19. Valley of Mexico 77 20. Kolino del Rey and Chapultepec 80 21.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Elsinore's Crescent Bathhouse
    66 LIFELINER The following article was contributed by member Susan Simmons, whose family members are descendants of Frank Ferris, the architect and builder of the Crescent Bathhouse. The entire text and photos were taken from the document that was presented to Susan’s family, along with a certificate of appreciation from the Lake Elsinore Historical Association, when they recently visited the bathhouse. The Crescent Bathhouse, erected in 1887 was designed after the moorish style of architecture of the Victorian era. Graphic from http://wikimapia.org/4219377/Crescent-Bathhouse Lake Elsinore’s Crescent Bathhouse We would like to take this opportunity to express our sincere good wishes to all of the people who helped us in preparing this publication. In the pages that follow we have tried to show some of the development of the valley using Lake Elsinore's Historical Bathhouse as the center point. We have found that in a world of increasing congestion, this small working community, blessed with many assets, has retained its rural atmosphere and that life, of course, wasn't all leisure. The economy so closely tied to the condition of the lake has created tribulation as well as pleasure and a quality of life unsurpassed in other areas. And now, with the new plan in effect, there is no doubt that this area will once again be a garden spot and enjoy many new enterprises, bringing new people to become a part of our community. Lory and Wilma Watts The Valley of La Laguna Rancho With On record in the county of San Diego is data Its Lake Laguna Grande
    [Show full text]
  • The Texas Rangers in the Mexican War, 1846-1848
    MIXED BLESSING: THE ROLE OF THE TEXAS RANGERS IN THE MEXICAN WAR, 1846-1848 A thesis presented to the Faculty of the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF MILITARY ART AND SCIENCE Military History by IAN B. LYLES, MAJ, USA M.A., University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, 2001 Fort Leavenworth, Kansas 2003 Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. i MASTER OF MILITARY ART AND SCIENCE THESIS APPROVAL PAGE Name of Candidate: MAJ Ian B. Lyles Thesis Title: Mixed Blessing: The Role of the Texas Rangers in the Mexican War, 1846- 1848 Approved by: , Thesis Committee Chair COL Lawyn C. Edwards, M.S., M.M.A.S. , Member LTC Steven E. Clay, M.A. , Member William S. Reeder, Ph.D. Accepted this 6th day of June 2003 by: , Director, Graduate Degree Programs Philip J. Brookes, Ph.D. The opinions and conclusions expressed herein are those of the student author and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College or any other governmental agency. (References to this study should include the foregoing statement.) ii ABSTRACT MIXED BLESSING: THE ROLE OF THE TEXAS RANGERS IN THE MEXICAN WAR, 1846-1848, by MAJ Ian B. Lyles, 110 pages. The Texas Rangers assumed many roles during the Mexican War (1846-1848), fighting in both the northern and central theaters. Along with frontier knowledge and combat experience, they also brought prejudices and they earned a reputation for ill-discipline. Thus, the central research question is whether the Texas Rangers contributed to the success of conventional army forces or did they materially hinder Generals Taylor and Scott more than they helped? Analysis begins by discussing the Mexican War, the Texas Rangers, and the concept of Compound Warfare (CW) (conventional and unconventional forces employed simultaneously to gain a synergistic advantage).
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report on the Archaeological
    Final Report on the Archaeological Field Work Conducted on a Portion of the Kiriṭ-smin ’ayye Sokṓte Tápporikmatka [Place of Yerba Buena and Laurel Trees Site] CA-SCL-895 (Blauer Ranch) Located within the Evergreen Valley District, San Jose, Santa Clara County, Ca. Report Prepared for San Jose State University, Department of Anthropology The Muwekma Ohlone Tribe of the San Francisco Bay Area, and College of Social Sciences Research Foundation Prepared by: Emily C. McDaniel, Alan Leventhal (MA), Diane DiGiuseppe (MS), Melynda Atwood (MS), David Grant (MS) and Muwekma Tribal Members: Rosemary Cambra, Charlene Nijmeh, Monica V. Arellano, Sheila Guzman-Schmidt, Gloria E. Gomez, and Norma Sanchez With Contributions by Dr. Eric Bartelink, Department of Anthropology, California State University, Chico Dr. Brian Kemp, Department of Anthropology, Washington State University, Pullman Cara Monroe, School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman Jean Geary (MS), Department of Nutrition, Food Science and Packaging, SJSU Orhan Kaya, Archaeological Illustrator December 2012 Table of Contents Page No. Table of Contents i List of Figures iii List of Tables x List of Maps xii Acknowledgments xiii Dedication of this Report xiv Chapter 1: Introduction, Excavation Background History and Overview 1-1 (Emily C. McDaniel and Alan Leventhal) Chapter 2: Environmental Setting and Paleo-Ecological Reconstruction and Catchment Analysis (Alan Leventhal and Emily C. McDaniel) 2-1 Chapter 3: The Analysis of Human Osteological Remains 3-1 (Emily C. McDaniel, Melynda Atwood, Diane DiGiuseppe, and Alan Leventhal) Chapter 4: Preliminary Report on the Extraction of DNA for Sites: CA-SCL-30H, CA-SCL-38, CA-SCL-287/SMA263, CA-SCL-755, CA-SCL-851, CA-SCL-870, CA-SCL-894, and CA-SCL-895 4-1 (Cara Monroe and Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Documents Pertaining to the Adjudication of Private Land Claims in California, Circa 1852-1904
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/hb109nb422 Online items available Finding Aid to the Documents Pertaining to the Adjudication of Private Land Claims in California, circa 1852-1904 Finding Aid written by Michelle Morton and Marie Salta, with assistance from Dean C. Rowan and Randal Brandt The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu/ © 2008, 2013 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Finding Aid to the Documents BANC MSS Land Case Files 1852-1892BANC MSS C-A 300 FILM 1 Pertaining to the Adjudication of Private Land Claims in Cali... Finding Aid to the Documents Pertaining to the Adjudication of Private Land Claims in California, circa 1852-1904 Collection Number: BANC MSS Land Case Files The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California Finding Aid Written By: Michelle Morton and Marie Salta, with assistance from Dean C. Rowan and Randal Brandt. Date Completed: March 2008 © 2008, 2013 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Collection Summary Collection Title: Documents pertaining to the adjudication of private land claims in California Date (inclusive): circa 1852-1904 Collection Number: BANC MSS Land Case Files 1852-1892 Microfilm: BANC MSS C-A 300 FILM Creators : United States. District Court (California) Extent: Number of containers: 857 Cases. 876 Portfolios. 6 volumes (linear feet: Approximately 75)Microfilm: 200 reels10 digital objects (1494 images) Repository: The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu/ Abstract: In 1851 the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1. Specimens Examined
    Knapp et al. – Appendix 1 – Morelloid Clade in North and Central America and the Caribbean -1 Appendix 1. Specimens examined We list here in traditional format all specimens examined for this treatment from North and Central America and the Caribbean. Countries, major divisions within them (when known), and collectors (by surname) are listed in alphabetic order. 1. Solanum americanum Mill. ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA. Antigua: SW, Blubber Valley, Blubber Valley, 26 Sep 1937, Box, H.E. 1107 (BM, MO); sin. loc. [ex Herb. Hooker], Nicholson, D. s.n. (K); Barbuda: S.E. side of The Lagoon, 16 May 1937, Box, H.E. 649 (BM). BAHAMAS. Man O'War Cay, Abaco region, 8 Dec 1904, Brace, L.J.K. 1580 (F); Great Ragged Island, 24 Dec 1907, Wilson, P. 7832 (K). Andros Island: Conch Sound, 8 May 1890, Northrop, J.I. & Northrop, A.R. 557 (K). Eleuthera: North Eleuthera Airport, Low coppice and disturbed area around terminal and landing strip, 15 Dec 1979, Wunderlin, R.P. et al. 8418 (MO). Inagua: Great Inagua, 12 Mar 1890, Hitchcock, A.S. s.n. (MO); sin. loc, 3 Dec 1890, Hitchcock, A.S. s.n. (F). New Providence: sin. loc, 18 Mar 1878, Brace, L.J.K. 518 (K); Nassau, Union St, 20 Feb 1905, Wight, A.E. 111 (K); Grantstown, 28 May 1909, Wilson, P. 8213 (K). BARBADOS. Moucrieffe (?), St John, Near boiling house, Apr 1940, Goodwing, H.B. 197 (BM). BELIZE. carretera a Belmopan, 1 May 1982, Ramamoorthy, T.P. et al. 3593 (MEXU). Belize: Belize Municipal Airstrip near St. Johns College, Belize City, 21 Feb 1970, Dieckman, L.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment for the 39.39-Acre Wildomar MDP Lateral C Revision Project, Riverside County, California
    Report Date: July 2020 Field work date: September 12, 2017 Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment for the 39.39-Acre Wildomar MDP Lateral C Revision Project, Riverside County, California U.S. Geological Survey 7.5-minute Quadrangles: Lake Elsinore (1997), Wildomar (1997), Township 6 South, Range 4 West of Sections 23, 26, and 35; Unsectioned area of the La Laguna (Stearns) Land Grant Parcel Information: Project area includes 54 parcels (APN 366-300-079, 367-110-007, 367- 110-008, 367-130-042, 367-130-043, 367-140-010, 367-140-011, 367-160-010, 367-160-050, 367-160-051, 367-160-052, 367-160-053, 367-160-058, 367-160-059, 367-160-060, 367-160- 061, 367-180-015, 367-180-017, 367-180-043, 367-210-021, 367-210-029, 367-210-042, 367- 220-024, 367-220-042, 367-220-044, 367-220-050, 367-431-001, 367-431-002, 367-433-015, 367-472-020, 376-060-015, 376-060-016, 376-060-031, 376-070-008, 376-070-009, 376-070- 027, 376-080-010, 376-080-014, 376-080-024, 376-160-020, 376-170-001, 376-170-002, 376- 170-006, 376-170-009, 376-170-011, 376,170-012, 376-170-013, 376-180-004, 376-180-006, 376-180-007, 376-180-012, 376-190-001, 376-190-002, 380-050-004, 380-050-005) Owner Applicant: Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District 1995 Market Street Riverside, CA 92501 Prepared For: County of Riverside Planning Department 4080 Lemon Street, 12th Floor Riverside, CA 92501 (951) 955-2873 Prepared By: Wendy Blumel and Robert Cunningham Principal Investigator Roger Mason, Ph.D., RPA ECORP Consulting, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Tennessee and Indiana Volunteers in the Mexican War
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 5-2003 "That spirit of chivalry" : Tennessee and Indiana volunteers in the Mexican War Tyler Vincent Johnson Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Recommended Citation Johnson, Tyler Vincent, ""That spirit of chivalry" : Tennessee and Indiana volunteers in the Mexican War. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2003. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/5242 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Tyler Vincent Johnson entitled ""That spirit of chivalry" : Tennessee and Indiana volunteers in the Mexican War." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in History. Paul Bergeron, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Tyler Johnson entitled "�That spirit of chivalry': Tennessee and Indiana Volunteers in the Mexican War." I have examined the finalpaper copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillmentof the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in History.
    [Show full text]
  • Rules of Play
    The Halls of Montezuma 1 GMT Games, LLC P.O. Box 1308, Hanford, CA 93232-1308 www.GMTGames.com RULE BOOK The Halls of Montezuma 1 RULes OF PLAY CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................2 13.0 Placement Actions, Fortifications, and Fortresses ...............12 2.0 Components ........................................................................2 14.0 Naval Movement, Squadrons, Port Seizure, and Blockade ..13 3.0 Game Concepts ...................................................................4 15.0 Armies ...............................................................................14 4.0 Set Up and Sequence of Play ...............................................5 16.0 Raids and Guerillas ............................................................14 5.0 Political Will and Victory ....................................................6 17.0 Discarding and Holding Cards ..........................................14 6.0 Supply and Control .............................................................6 18.0 Governmental Status/ End Turn Phase, War Declaration, and 7.0 Random Events Phase and Action Cards .............................© 2008 GMT7 Games, LLCRevolts ...............................................................................15 8.0 Deal Cards Phase and Strategy Cards ...................................7 19.0 Comprehensive Example of Play ........................................16 9.0 Action Phase ........................................................................©
    [Show full text]
  • Connecticut Military and Naval Leaders in the Civil War Connecticut Civil War Centennial Commission •
    Cont•Doc l 489 c c f· • 4 THE CONNECTICUT CIVIL WAR CENTENNIAL CONNECTICUT MILITARY AND NAVAL LEADERS IN THE CIVIL WAR CONNECTICUT CIVIL WAR CENTENNIAL COMMISSION • ALBERT D. PUTNAM, Chairman WILLIAM j. FINAN, Vice Chairman WILLIAM j . LoWRY, Secretary • E XEcUTIVE CoMMITTEE ALBERT D. PuTNAM .................... ............................ Ha·rtford WILLIAM j. FINAN ................................................ Woodmont WILLIAM j. LOWRY .............................................. Wethers field BENEDicT M. HoLDEN, jR• ................................ West l!artfortl EDWARD j. LoNERGAN ................................................ Hartford HAMILToN BAsso ........................................ ............ Westport VAN WYcK BRooKs .......... .................................. Bridgewater CHARLES A. BucK ................. ........................... West Hartford j. DoYLE DEWITT .... ............ .. ...... ............ .... .... West Hartford RoBERT EisENBERG ..... .. .................. ... ........................ Stratford ALLAN KELLER .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... ....... Darien WILLIAM E. MILLs, jR. .......................................... Stamford EDwARD OLsEN ............................ ....... .. ................... Westbrook PROF. RoLLIN G. OsTERWEis ................................ New Havm FRANK E. RAYMOND ................................................ Rowayton ALBERT S. REDWAY ................................ .................... Hamden RoBERT SALE .......................................
    [Show full text]