DOCSLIB.ORG

Design of a Hoistable Helicopter Platform for 60M Yacht

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Design of a Hoistable Helicopter Platform for 60M Yacht Design of a hoistable helicopter platform for 60m yacht Zsolt Papp Master Thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the double degree: “Advanced Master in Naval Architecture” conferred by University of Liege "Master of Sciences in Applied Mechanics, specialization in Hydrodynamics, Energetics and Propulsion” conferred by Ecole Centrale de Nantes developed at University of Genoa in the framework of the “EMSHIP” Erasmus Mundus Master Course in “Integrated Advanced Ship Design” Ref. 159652-1-2009-1-BE-ERA MUNDUS-EMMC Supervisor: Prof. Dario Boote, University of Genoa Reviewer: Prof. Philippe Rigo, University of Liege Genoa, February 2012 2 Zsolt PAPP TABLE OF CONTENTS DECLARATION OF AUTHORSHIP ................................................................................... 6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................... 7 ABSTRACT (English)........................................................................................................... 8 PRESENTAZIONE (Italiano) ................................................................................................ 9 ABSTRAKTE (Deutsch) ......................................................................................................10 1. INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................11 1.1. Overview ..................................................................................................................11 1.2. State of the art ...........................................................................................................13 1.3. Work purpose ............................................................................................................14 1.4. Background ...............................................................................................................15 1.5. Thesis structure .........................................................................................................16 2. LITERATURE AND PRELIMINARY REQUIREMENTS..............................................18 2.1. Review of the applicable rules (MCA-LY2, CAA and LR) ........................................18 2.1.1. Introduction .....................................................................................................18 2.1.2. MCA (Maritime and Coastguard Authority) .....................................................18 2.1.3. CAA (Civil Aviation Authority) .......................................................................20 2.1.4. Lloyd’s Register ...............................................................................................21 2.2. Choice of the yacht and helicopter .............................................................................22 2.2.1. Introduction .....................................................................................................22 2.2.2. Choice of the Yacht ..........................................................................................23 2.2.2.1. Mega yachts and Charters.................................................................23 2.2.2.2. BENETTI FB255, 60 m, Steel and Aluminum ..................................24 2.2.3. Landing area ....................................................................................................25 2.2.3.1. General Helicopter Operations .........................................................25 2.2.3.2. Determination of the landing area location .......................................25 2.2.3.3. Landing area size .............................................................................27 2.2.4. Choice of the Helicopter...................................................................................28 2.2.4.1. Helicopters .......................................................................................28 2.2.4.2. Eurocopter........................................................................................29 2.2.4.3. Eurocopter Colibri EC120 B.............................................................30 2.3. Review of the initial deck ..........................................................................................32 2.3.1. Introduction .....................................................................................................32 Master Thesis developed at University of Genoa Design of a hoistable helicopter platform for 60m yacht 3 2.3.2. Generalities ......................................................................................................32 2.3.3. Description of the initial deck...........................................................................33 2.3.4. Theoretical structural assessment of the initial helideck ....................................35 2.3.5. Finite element method ......................................................................................38 2.4. Determination of the geometrical constraints .............................................................48 2.4.1. Introduction .....................................................................................................48 2.4.2. Helicopter Landing Area Design Considerations ..............................................49 2.4.2.1. Size of Landing Area (SLA) .............................................................49 2.4.2.2. Obstacle Protected Surfaces (OPS) ...................................................50 2.4.2.3. Limited Obstacle Sector (LOS) ........................................................51 2.4.2.4. Obstacle Free Areas (OFA) ..............................................................54 2.4.3. Other Design Considerations ............................................................................56 2.4.3.1. Drainage system ...............................................................................56 2.4.3.2. Access Points ...................................................................................56 3. PRELIMINARY MODELING OF THE LANDING AREA ............................................58 3.1. Aesthetic impact on the yacht ....................................................................................58 3.1.1. Introduction .....................................................................................................58 3.1.2. Sundeck aesthetics ...........................................................................................59 3.3.2.1. Sundeck general arrangement ...........................................................59 3.3.2.2. Sundeck structural scantling .............................................................59 3.1.3. Helideck aesthetics ...........................................................................................63 3.2. Modeling of the landing area .....................................................................................65 4.2.1. Introduction .....................................................................................................65 4.2.2. Preliminary structural assessment .....................................................................65 4.2.3. Preliminary design ...........................................................................................70 4.2.4. Structural weight analysis.................................................................................71 3.3. Preliminary structural assessment ..............................................................................72 3.3.1. Introduction .....................................................................................................72 3.3.2. Theoretical structural assessment .....................................................................75 3.3.3. Finite element method ......................................................................................86 3.4. Preliminary preview ..................................................................................................92 4. FINAL MODELING OF THE LANDING AREA ...........................................................93 4.1. Design of the landing area .........................................................................................93 4.1.1. Structural modeling of the landing area ............................................................93 “EMSHIP” Erasmus Mundus Master Course, period of study September 2010 – February 2012 4 Zsolt PAPP 4.1.2. Design of the mechanism .................................................................................96 4.1.2.1. Weight analysis ................................................................................96 4.1.2.2. Choose of the pistons .......................................................................97 4.1.2.3. Foldable Mechanism ........................................................................99 4.2. Basic outfitting ........................................................................................................ 102 4.2.1. Landing area surface ...................................................................................... 102 4.2.2. Visual Aids .................................................................................................... 103 4.2.2.1. Helicopter Landing Area Markings ................................................ 103 4.2.2.2. Lighting ......................................................................................... 103 4.3. Final structural assessment ...................................................................................... 104 5. CONCLUSIONS ..........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Police Aviation News August 2015
    Police Aviation News August 2015 ©Police Aviation Research Number 232 August 2015 PAR Police Aviation News August 2015 2 PAN—Police Aviation News is published monthly by POLICE AVIATION RESEARCH, 7 Wind- mill Close, Honey Lane, Waltham Abbey, Essex EN9 3BQ UK. Contacts: Main: +44 1992 714162 Cell: +44 7778 296650 Skype: BrynElliott E-mail: [email protected] Police Aviation Research Airborne Law Enforcement Member since 1994—Corporate Member since 2014 SPONSORS Airborne Technologies www.airbornetechnologies.at AeroComputers www.aerocomputers.com Avalex Displays www.avalex.com Broadcast Microwave www.bms-inc.com FLIR Systems www.flir.com L3 Wescam www.wescam.com Powervamp www.powervamp.com Trakka Searchlights www.trakkacorp.com Airborne Law Enforcement Association www.alea.org EDITORIAL I have just returned from Houston and the ALEA annual convention. It may be many miles from my home shores and the words may have been spoken by an American but they rang somewhat true to the situation at home where the new and developing National Police Air Service is still finding its feet. I was sitting in on the Unit Managers Course when the instructor, a greatly respected man who earned his respect by running a large and successful air operation, reminded his stu- dents of their purpose in life. “If the cops on the street are not screaming for you to come in the expectation of getting [air support] help, the operation is flawed and should be considered a failure” Bryn Elliott LAW ENFORCEMENT BRAZIL PARA: Emergency services aviation in Brazil has reportedly fallen on hard times. A few years ago the sector had in place a major forward plan that encompassed most of Brazil’s States and most of the airborne service provision and was expected to see growth in re- sources and manpower controlled within a number of complex governing groups [DFNSP, CAVSEG, CONAV, AEAP, SENASP] but when President Rousseff took power in 2011 she swept them away leaving a vacuum.
    [Show full text]
  • Decision 2005/07/R
    DECISION No 2005/07/R OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE AGENCY of 19-12-2005 amending Decision No 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 on acceptable means of compliance and guidance material to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2042/2003 on the continuing airworthiness of aircraft and aeronautical products, parts and appliances, and on the approval of organisations and personnel involved in these tasks THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE EUROPEAN AVIATION SAFETY AGENCY, Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1592/2002 of 15 July 2002 on common rules in the field of civil aviation (hereinafter referred to as the Basic Regulation) and establishing a European Aviation Safety Agency1 (hereinafter referred to as the “Agency”), and in particular Articles 13 and 14 thereof. Having regard to the Commission Regulation (EC) No 2042/2003 of 28 November 2003 on the continuing airworthiness of aircraft and aeronautical products, parts and appliances, and on the approval of organisations and personnel involved in these tasks.2 Whereas: (1) Annex IV Acceptable Means of Compliance to Part- 66 Appendix 1 Aircraft type ratings for Part-66 aircraft maintenance licence (hereinafter referred to as Part-66 AMC Appendix I) is required to be up to date to serve as reference for the national aviation authorities. (2) To achieve this requirement the text of Part-66 AMC Appendix I should be amended regularly to add new aircraft type rating. (3) The regular amendment of Part-66 AMC Appendix I is considered as a permanent rulemaking task for the Agency. This decision represents the first update according to an accelerated procedure accepted by AGNA and SSCC.
    [Show full text]
  • AD 2012-0170R2 [Task 2014.211] TGB Oil Level and Magnetic Chip Detector Insp and Pitch Control Rod Bearing Insp
    EASA AD No.: 2012-0170R2 EASA AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE AD No.: 2012-0170R2 Date: 20 June 2014 Note: This Airworthiness Directive (AD) is issued by EASA, acting in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 on behalf of the European Community, its Member States and of the European third countries that participate in the activities of EASA under Article 66 of that Regulation. This AD is issued in accordance with EU 748/2012, Part 21.A.3B. In accordance with EC 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M.A.301, the continuing airworthiness of an aircraft shall be ensured by accomplishing any applicable ADs. Consequently, no person may operate an aircraft to which an AD applies, except in accordance with the requirements of that AD, unless otherwise specified by the Agency [EC 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M.A.303] or agreed with the Authority of the State of Registry [EC 216/2008, Article 14(4) exemption]. Design Approval Holder’s Name: Type/Model designation(s): AIRBUS HELICOPTERS SA 365, AS 365, SA 366 and EC 155 helicopters TCDS Number: EASA.R.105 Foreign AD: Not applicable Revision: This AD revises EASA AD 2012-0170R1, dated 18 October 2013. ATA 05 Time Limits and Maintenance Checks – Tail Rotor Gearbox (TGB) Oil Level and Magnetic Chip Detector – Inspection ATA 65 Tail Rotor – Pitch Control Rod Bearing – Inspection / Replacement Manufacturer(s): Airbus Helicopters (formerly Eurocopter, Eurocopter France, Aerospatiale). Applicability: SA 365 N1, AS 365 N2, AS 365 N3, SA 366 G1, EC 155 B and EC 155 B1 helicopters, all serial numbers, except those modified in accordance with Eurocopter (EC) modification (mod) 07 65B63.
    [Show full text]
  • Helideck Manual
    English version HELIDECK MANUAL Helicopter operations on offshore installations In cooperation with Revision date 01.09.2016 revisjonsdato 01.12.2015 Changes in this edition: • “OLF” is systematically changed to “Norwegian Oil and Gas Association” • References to Authority regulations updated • Relevant EN-standards updated • Minor changes in health requirements • Minor addition in refueling procedures • Enclosure F1 updated • Enclosure F2 updated • Enclosure F3 cancelled • Enclosure G updated • Enclosure I updated • Enclosure L updated DOKUMENTNR: REVISONSNR: REVISJONSDATO: Final 01.09.2016 Side 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 General .......................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Purpose and scope ......................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Responsibilities ............................................................................................................... 5 1.3 Approval ......................................................................................................................... 5 1.4 Distribution and Amendments ......................................................................................... 5 1.5 References ..................................................................................................................... 6 1.6 Definitions ....................................................................................................................... 6 2
    [Show full text]
  • 10 Seiten Heli!
    Neuer EC130 T2 Das Schweizer Luftfahrt-Magazin Nr. 11/November 2012 CHF on 8.20 Tour / € 5.50 Cover Story 10 Seiten Heli! Military Aviation History Civil Aviation Deutsche Eurofighter Erfolglose Bericht von bei Red Flag Dewoitine D.27 der ILA «Trotz Sistierung 365 Tage fliegen.» In die Prämie eingerechneter Nutzungsrabatt/ Luftfahrtversicherung Bedürfnisgerechter Versicherungsschutz Keine Hinterlegung des Lufttüchtigkeitszeugnisses Keine Meldung der Sistierung Jetzt Offerte beantragen: Urs Spiegelberg, 052 261 58 33 AXA_Luftfahrt_210x297_cmyk_d.indd 1 06.09.2012 16:17:16 Cockpit 11 2012 Editorial 3 «Trotz Sistierung 365 Tage fliegen.» Take-off Liebe Leserinnen und Leser Ein aus Sicht der zivilen Luft- Was bei Bombardier auch auffällt, ist die Sorgfalt, mit der die Ka- fahrt ereignisreiches Jahr nadier zu Werke gehen. In den Fertigungshallen in Montreal sind geht bald zu Ende. Ereignis- überall Modelle im Massstab 1:1 zu sehen, sogar für die Herstellung reich nicht in dem Sinn, dass eines in heutiger Zeit antiquiert wirkenden Vogels aus Holz war in dieser Zeit haufenweise man sich nicht zu schade. Nichts soll dem Zufall überlassen wer- neue, revolutionäre Würfe den. Mit Genugtuung dürfen sie auch die Erprobung des PW1524G angekündigt wurden, son- verfolgen, die bisher programmgemäss verlaufen ist. Laut Herstel- dern dass die Hersteller die ler Pratt&Whitney sind beim Getriebefan nach Absolvierung von Früchte ihrer Anstrengun- mehr als drei Vierteln des Testprogramms keine nennenswerten gen allmählich ernten kön- Probleme aufgetreten. Keine Selbstverständlichkeit bei der in der nen, das Kundeninteresse für kommerziellen Luftfahrt zum ersten Mal verwendeten Triebwerk- ihre modernisierten Bestseller mehr als geweckt haben und im technologie. Und schliesslich: Die Kunden, die das Muster als erste Hintergrund mit Hochdruck an ihren neuen Projekten arbeiten.
    [Show full text]
  • 201311 General Aviation Report November 2013
    OCCURRENCE LISTING Aircraft Below 5700kg OCCURRENCES RECORDED BETWEEN 01 November 2013 and 30 November 2013 FIXED WING AIRCRAFT AERO AT3 BOMBARDIER ROTAX Standing EGBK (ORM): 08/11/2013 201314409 912 Northampton/Sywell Numerous flights carried out and not entered in aircraft Tech Logs. Over a period from March 2009 to July 2013, there have been 152 flights (approx 120 flight hours) carried out using four aircraft. No Tech Log entries have been made for any of these flights. There are significant airworthiness implications for the aircraft involved. All four aircraft are currently grounded. Appropriate CAA action is being taken as a result of this incident. AUSTER AUSTER J (J5K) OTHER (Blackburn Rejected take-off Watchford Farm Strip 06/10/2013 201315059 Cirrus Minor IIA) UK Reportable Accident: Aircraft overran runway during rejected take-off and struck a fence. Damage to rear fuselage and tail plate. Two POB, no injuries. Subject to AAIB AARF investigation. AVIONS ROBIN DR400 LYCOMING En-route Casablanca FIR 06/10/2013 201314382 360 FAMILY DR400 infringed an active area closed by NOTAM within the Casablanca FIR. Content: This list contains occurrences and accidents to aircraft of 5700kg and below recorded on the MOR database during the period shown above. The list includes information reported to the CAA, information from CAA investigations and deductions by CAA staff. The authenticity of the contents or absence of errors and omissions cannot be guaranteed. The list contains preliminary information. Purpose: The information is supplied for flight safety purposes only. Queries & Contact Safety Data Department, Civil Aviation Authority, Aviation House, Gatwick Reporting: Airport, W Sussex, RH6 0YR.
    [Show full text]
  • L'industrie Aéronautique Et Spatiale Française
    Le Groupement des Industries Françaises, L’industrie Aéronautique et Spatiale Française Chiffre d’affaires ’acte de naissance de l’industrie Aéronautiques et Spatiales ette industrie de souveraineté, de haute technologie, aéronautique, spatial, défense et sécurité en million d’euro (Me). L aéronautique française porte la performante, structurée, économiquement essentielle, Total 2011 estimé 38 500 Me (CA non consolidé). date du 11 janvier 1908. Ce jour là, C participe à la richesse de la France et contribue largement à quelques pionniers dont Louis Blériot, Le Gifas a trois missions principales : son rayonnement dans le monde. Avec 77 % de son chiffre d’affaires 28 % 28 % Louis Breguet, Gabriel Voisin et Robert consolidé réalisé à l’exportation, l’industrie française aéronautique, Militaire Répartition Militaire Représenter et coordonner Étudier et défendre Promouvoir les capacités 10 800 M 10 800 M spatiale, avec sa composante défense et sécurité, est72 le% premier secteur 28 % 72 % civil / militaire Esnault-Pelterie fondent la Chambre Civil Civil 28 % 1/ les activités de la profession 2/ les intérêts de ses adhérents 3/ technologiques industrielles Militaire Militaire 27 700 M Syndicale des Industries Aéronautiques, et humaines de la France dans exportateur français et dégage le premier excédent27 700 Mcommercial. 10 800 M HAUTE-NORMANDIE Le Conseil d’Administration du GIFAS, composé des L’étude et la défense des intérêts de la profession 72 % 72 % 10 800 M DASSAULT AVIATION 3 % Civil avec le but clairement exposé dirigeants des sociétés adhérentes, détermine les lignes entrent dans les missions naturelles de tout groupement le domaine aéronautique et spatial Son carnet de commandes représente l’équivalent de quatre années Civil 27 700 M 27 700 M d’action du GIFAS, en fonction des problèmes communs professionnel.
    [Show full text]
  • Eurocopter's EC175 Helicopter Confirms Its Position As
    Eurocopter’s EC175 helicopter confirms its position as leader in the medium-sized twin-engine helicopter market segment Marignane, France, December 12, 2012 Eurocopter has conducted the first flight of its no. 1 series-production EC175, and confirmed the excellent performance of this next-generation multi-role helicopter. The maiden flight occurred last week at Eurocopter’s Marignane, France headquarters facility, with company pilot Augustin Dupuis at the controls. “With this first production series aircraft now airborne, the EC175 helicopter is a reality, and Eurocopter is very pleased to bring this new product in its civil range to the market,” said Lutz Bertling, Eurocopter’s President & CEO. “This first flight is the occasion to confirm our objective – which was to develop, in cooperation with our industrial Chinese partner, AVIC – the safest and best medium-sized rotorcraft, which also is a leader in terms of competitiveness, power efficiency and comfort. Following the success of Eurocopter’s EC130 T2 and the EC145 T2, the EC175 is yet another example of our strategy to provide outstanding value to customers.” Eurocopter today announced performance figures that ensure the EC175’s competitive edge. Its recommended cruise speed is 150 kts. – 10 kts. faster than the previous figure without affecting payload range – while the maximum cruise speed exceeds 165 kts., all at extremely low vibration levels. Eurocopter’s program flight tests to date also have confirmed the EC175’s excellent power performance including: hover out of ground effect (HOGE) at maximum take-off weight at 4,500 ft. at ISA+20°C conditions; excellent one engine inoperative (OEI) hover performance, which ensures safety during hosting for search and rescue missions ; extensive power reserve and heli-deck performance (PC1) at maximum take-off weight in ISA+20°C conditions –available with application of the latest certified version of Pratt & Whitney Canada’s PT6C-67E engines.
    [Show full text]
  • Organisations Approved in Accordance with Part M, Subpart G Published 04 September 2018 That Have ARC Privileges
    Organisations approved in accordance with Part M, Subpart G Published 04 September 2018 that have ARC privileges Approval Address Aircraft Type Reference UK.MG.0231 2 Excel Aviation Limited Extra EA200/300 Series The Tiger House Sywell Aerodrome Piper PA31 AOC No GB2299 Sywell Beech 200 Series Northamptonshire NN6 0BN Boeing 727 Tel: 01778 590448 Eurocopter EC135 Series Email: [email protected] Boeing 737 300/400/500 Regional Office: Shared Service Centre UK.MG.0661 A2B Aero Limited EUROCOPTER AS355 SERIES Hangar 4S Oxford Airport SIKORSKY S76 SERIES AOC No Kidlington BELL 429 SERIES Oxfordshire OX5 1RA EUROCOPTER AS365 SERIES Tel: 01844 352239 / 07777 236 0123 EUROCOPTER EC135 SERIES Email: [email protected] SINGLE TURBINE ENGINE HELICOPTERS NOT E AGUSTA WESTLAND AW139 Regional Office: Shared Service Centre EUROCOPTER BO105 EUROCOPTER DEUTSCHLAND MBB-BK 117 SERI EUROCOPTER EC155 SERIES MD HELICOPTERS 902 ROBINSON R22/R44 AGUSTA AW109 SERIES BELL 212/AGUSTA AB212 BELL 412/AGUSTA AB412 AIRBUS HELICOPTERS EC225 AIRBUS HELICOPTERS AS332 UK.MG.0494 Acropolis Aviation Limited AIRBUS A319-100 SERIES Business Aviation Centre Farnborough AOC No 2363 Airport Farnborough Hampshire GU14 6XA Tel: 01458 241112 Email: aidan.murphy@acropolis- aviation.com Regional Office: Shared Service Centre UK.MG.0385 ACS Aviation Limited SINGLE TURBOPROP AEROPLANES NOT EXCEED Hangar 4 Perth Airport PISTON ENGINE AEROPLANES - METAL STRUCT AOC No Scone PISTON ENGINE AEROPLANES - COMPOSITE ST Perthshire PH2 6PL PISTON ENGINE AEROPLANES - WOODEN STRU
    [Show full text]
  • Turning the Blades – the New EASA Rotorcraft Roadmap Team Takes Off!
    ROTORCRAFT ROADMAP 1 Turning the blades – the new EASA Rotorcraft Roadmap team takes off! Working in partnership - a success story he Rotorcraft Roadmap combines safety 2nd-largest fleet in the world behind the US. It also with a more agile and innovative approach. has a strong manufacturing industry with Airbus TFollowing the outstanding example of the Helicopters and Leonardo Helicopters covering GA Roadmap and its team, this common effort of 70% of the worldwide civil market for the 1 ton+ FS, CT and SM has led to another cross-Directorate range. Still, the rotorcraft industry continues to success story! This background feature outlines the be underestimated in Europe compared to fixed reasons behind the urgent need for changes, the wing aeroplanes, the automotive industry, or current situation of Europe’s helicopter fleets and also railways. operations and about safety! It also takes a closer look at the Rotorcraft Roadmap, its short-, mid- Helicopters are an important part of our daily lives and long-term goals, what are the next steps, and and our society’s functioning – they are used for what has been achieved so far. essential activities such as aerial work in mountains, agriculture, offshore, or for emergency operations to Europe has a strong rotorcraft industry. With more save lives. than 7 700 helicopters flying, Europe has the Region of the world Number of Rotorcraft in Europe - a strong industry (by state of registration) civil rotorcraft Leonardo AW189 USA 9,073 EASA Member states 7,762 Asia 5,363 Latin America 4,383 Russia 3,249 Oceania 2,885 Africa 2,446 Canada 2,409 Middle East 1,056 Europe (non-EASA) 954 Central America 511 Airbus AS350 Grand Total 40,091 With more than 7 700 civil rotorcraft in operation, Europe is number two in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Varga Béla Helikopter Gázturbinás Hajtóművek Technikai Elemzése
    Varga Béla HELIKOPTER GÁZTURBINÁS HAJTÓMŰVEK TECHNIKAI ELEMZÉSE A helikopterek erőforrásainak jelentős fejlődése, ami főképpen a hajtómű teljesítménytömegviszony, a hatásfok és fajlagos-tüzelőanyag fogyasztás, valamint megbízhatóság, és üzemeltethetőségben jelenik meg, természetesen kiha- tással volt a helikopterek harcászati technikai jellemzőire. Ezek a tények kutatásra érdemessé teszi ezt a területet. A cikkben végig követem a helikopter hajtóművek időbeni fejlődési folyamatát. Ismertetem működésük jellegzetességeit, a legfontosabb gyártókat és gyártmányokat. Statisztikai kimutatásokon keresztül szemléltetem, hogy milyen teljesít- mény paraméterekkel rendelkeztek a múltban és rendelkeznek a jelenleg alkalmazott helikopter hajtóművek. Kulcsszavak: Helikopter gázturbinás hajtóművek, turboshaft, tengelyteljesítmény, fajlagos tüzelőanyag fogyasz- tás, termikus hatásfok, fajlagos hasznos munka. A GÁZTURBINÁS KORSZAK KEZDETE A II. világháború végére a dugattyús légcsavaros repülőgépek elérték fejlődésük csúcspontját. Ez azt jelentette, hogy a sebességük valamivel meghaladta a 700 km/h-t. A repülési magasságuk elérte egy átlagos vadászrepülőgép esetében a 12 km-t, speciális felderítő változatok esetében pedig a 1415 km-t. Jól példázza ezt a folyamatot a II. világháború egyik legismertebb és talán legtöbb fejlesztési fázison átesett vadászrepülőgépe, a Messerschmitt Bf 109. Az 1. táblázat- ban táblázatban a teljesség igénye nélkül felsoroltam néhány fő változatát ennek a repülőgép- nek, szemléltetve, hogy az egyre nagyobb teljesítményű motorok nem hoztak átütő eredményt a repülőgépek sebesség növekedése szempontjából. Típus változat Év Motor Teljesítmény (Le) Sebesség (km/h) Bf 109B 1937 Jumo 210 720 466 Bf 109D 1938 DB 600 960 514 Bf 109E 1939 DB 601A 1175 569 Bf 109F 1941 DB 601N 1200 614 Bf 109G 1942 DB 605 1475 643 Bf 109K 1944 DB 605D 2000 (metanol befecsk.) 724 1. táblázat Bf 109 teljesítmény adatai [1] Ezek a korlátok ismertek voltak már a II.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Simulator Census 2014 Flightglobal Insight | 3
    IN ASSOCIATION WITH SPECIAL REPORT MILITARY SIMULATOR CENSUS 2014 Flightglobal Insight | 3 Flightglobal_Partner of Choice_Oct2014_AM310.indd 1 2014-10-28 8:37 AM MILITARY SIMULATOR CENSUS 2014 CONTENTS ABBREViaTIONS 4Mil 16 Indonesia 22 ANALYSIS 5Mitsubishi 17 Iran 22 NH Industries 17 Iraq 22 CENSUS BY aiRCRAFT MANUfacTURER Northrop Grumman 17 Israel 22 Aero Vodochody 7 Panavia 17 Italy 23 AgustaWestland 7 Pilatus 17 Japan 23 AIDC 7PZL 17 Jordan 23 Airbus Military 7 Raytheon 18 Kuwait 23 Alenia Aermacchi 8 Saab 18 Malaysia 23 AMX International 8 SEPECAT 18 Mexico 23 Antonov 8 Shenyang 18 Morocco 24 BAE Systems 8 Sikorsky 18 Myanmar 24 Beechcraft 8 Sukhoi 19 Netherlands 24 Bell 9 Transall 19 New Zealand 24 Bell Boeing 10 Tupolev 19 Nigeria 24 Boeing 10 Westland 19 Norway 24 Boeing Vertol 12 Oman 24 Boeing/BAS Systems 12 CENSUS BY OPERATOR COUNTRY Pakistan 24 Chengdu Aviation/Pakistan Aeronautical Complex 12 Algeria 20 Peru 24 CASA 12 Argentina 20 Poland 24 Dassault 12 Australia 20 Portugal 24 Dassault/Dornier 13 Austria 20 Qatar 24 Dassault-Breguet 13 Bahrain 20 Romania 24 Douglas 13 Belgium 20 Russia 24 Embraer 13 Brazil 20 Saudi Arabia 25 Enstrom 13 Brunei 20 Singapore 25 Eurocopter 13 Canada 20 Slovakia 25 Eurofighter 14 Chile 21 South Africa 25 Fairchild Republic 14 Colombia 21 South Korea 25 Hawker Beechcraft 14 Croatia 21 Spain 25 Hindustan Aeronautics 14 Czech Republic 21 Sudan 26 Hongdu 14 Denmark 21 Switzerland 26 IAR 14 Ecuador 21 Taiwan 26 Israel Aerospace Industries 14 Egypt 21 Thailand 26 Korea Aerospace Industries 14 Finland
    [Show full text]