DOCSLIB.ORG

Manual on Low-Level Wind Shear

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Manual on Low-Level Wind Shear Doc 9817 AN/449 Manual on Low-level Wind Shear Approved by the Secretary General and published under his authority First Edition — 2005 International Civil Aviation Organization Suzanne Doc 9817 AN/449 Manual on Low-level Wind Shear Approved by the Secretary General and published under his authority First Edition — 2005 International Civil Aviation Organization AMENDMENTS Amendments are announced in the supplements to the Catalogue of ICAO Publications; the Catalogue and its supplements are available on the ICAO website at www.icao.int. The space below is provided to keep a record of such amendments. RECORD OF AMENDMENTS AND CORRIGENDA AMENDMENTS CORRIGENDA No. Date Entered by No. Date Entered by 1 26/9/08 ICAO 1 17/11/05 ICAO 2 21/2/11 ICAO (iii) FOREWORD Since 1943, low-level wind shear has been cited in a number of aircraft accidents/incidents that together have contributed to over 1 400 fatalities worldwide. Increased awareness within the aviation community of the hazardous and insidious nature of low-level wind shear has been reflected in the fact that the ICAO Council has considered it to be one of the major technical problems facing aviation. Until the 1980s, lack of adequate operational remote-sensing equipment, the complexity of the subject, the wide range of scale of wind shear and its inherent unpredictability all conspired to hinder a complete solution to the problem which, in turn, limited the development of the necessary international Standards and Recommended Practices for the observing, reporting and forecasting of wind shear. In 1975 there were five jet transport aircraft accidents/incidents in which wind shear was cited, one of which resulted in major loss of life.1 The latter accident, which occurred at John F. Kennedy (JFK) International Airport, New York, on 24 June 1975, and another at Denver, Colorado, United States, on 7 August 1975, which fortunately resulted in no loss of life and occurred in an area where detailed monitoring of the wind field was possible, marked a turning point in the history of wind shear. The detailed and exhaustive analysis of the role played by wind shear in these particular accidents removed any lingering doubt regarding the real danger of wind shear. The accelerated research effort that followed, culminating in the massive Joint Airport Weather Studies (JAWS) project at Stapleton Airport, Denver, Colorado, United States, in 1982, considerably improved our understanding of the problem, particularly regarding wind shear associated with thunderstorms. The ICAO Eighth Air Navigation Conference (Montréal, 1974)2 recommended the preparation and publication of guidance material to assist all concerned to make the best possible use of the available information on wind shear. In order to assist in the preparation of this guidance material, the Low-level Wind Shear and Turbulence Study Group (WISTSG) was formed. With the assistance of the group a statement of operational requirements for observing and reporting wind shear and turbulence was developed. This statement, together with an initial list of recommended terms and their explanations and a progress report on wind shear, largely based upon circulars issued by some States, was sent as guidance to States in State letter AN 10/4.6-79/142, dated 31 August 1979. Following the increased research effort, Amendment 64 to Annex 3 — Meteorological Service for International Air Navigation was developed and became applicable in November 1983 and included new and revised provisions for the observing and reporting of low-level wind shear. At the same time, the statement of operational requirements was slightly revised (see Appendix 1). In 1982, the United States Subcommittees on Investigations and Oversight, and on Transportation, Aviation and Materials, of the House of Representatives’ Committee on Science and Technology held joint hearings on weather problems affecting aviation, including wind shear. Following those hearings, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) contracted with the National Academy of Sciences “to study the state of knowledge, alternative approaches and the consequences of wind shear alert and severe weather conditions relating to take-off and landing clearances for commercial and general (iii) 26/9/08 No. 1 (iv) Manual on Low-level Wind Shear aviation aircraft”. In order to accomplish this task, an ad hoc Committee for the Study of Low-Altitudea Wind Shear and its Hazard to Aviation was formed. The Committee produced an extremely comprehensive report and a series of conclusions and recommendations1 (see Appendix 2). Since 1967 the FAA has had a detailed programme directed towards reducing the hazard to aviation of low-level wind shear. Under this programme, action has been taken on the recommendations made by the above-mentioned Committee and also on recommendations made on occasion by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) following accident investigations. In this regard, the FAA developed an “Integrated Wind Shear Programme”, which involved close cooperation with a number of government agencies (e.g. the National Aeronautical and Space Administration (NASA), the aerospace industry, pilot associations and ICAO) and included a wind shear training aid that was published in February 1987. The programme’s objective was to further develop and refine over the next five to ten years education, training and operational procedures, surface-based and airborne wind shear detection technology and on-board flight guidance systems. In parallel, further explanation of the wind shear hazard was to be provided by continued scientific research. In 1987, with the assistance of the WISTSG, ICAO published Circular 186 on Wind Shear, the forerunner of this manual. At the time the circular on Wind Shear (Cir 186) was published in 1987, it was stated in the foreword that “the bulk of the information on wind shear, particularly the operational aspects, is still not sufficiently mature to be translated into regulatory provisions”. Subsequent amendments to the relevant Annexes and Procedures for Air Navigation Services (PANS) to take account of the requirement to provide information on wind shear to pilots, and the fact that the original circular has been replaced by this manual, attest to the increased maturity of this subject. Two main trends are responsible for the progress made in the past twenty years. Advances in the development of equipment to detect and warn of wind shear, both ground-based and airborne, have occurred since 1987. In particular, there have been major advances in Doppler radar and signal-processing technology, which have led to the development of highly effective, dedicated ground-based wind shear detection/warning systems. Similar advances have also produced forward-looking wind shear detection/warning systems to meet the operational requirements for airborne equipment. However, at the time of this writing, the level of deployment of such systems is much slower than expected for some airlines. The relevant ICAO regulatory documents have been amended in step with these technical developments. In parallel with the development of wind shear detection/warning equipment, progress has been made in the training of operational personnel concerning the serious effect that wind shear can have on aircraft in flight. Especially important is the training of pilots. Excellent wind shear training aids are available that cover the explanation and recognition of wind shear and its avoidance during landing and take-off. The flying techniques recommended in order for the pilot to recover from an inadvertent encounter with wind shear are also covered. Today all pilot simulator training should include wind shear recognition, avoidance and recovery modules. There has been a marked reduction in the past decade in the number of aircraft accidents/incidents in which wind shear was cited as a contributory factor. However, it will always be a serious hazard for aviation and a potential killer, and there must be continued vigilance and pilot training on wind shear. a. In this manual, the qualifying term “low-level” has been retained due to the fact that “altitude” is a defined ICAO term meaning “the vertical distance of a level, a point or an object considered as a point measured from mean sea level”. The critical issue with respect to wind shear is the effect on aircraft performance when in relatively close proximity to the ground. It is not felt that “low- level” in this context could be misconstrued as meaning low-level “in intensity”. 26/9/08 No. 1 Foreword (v) References 1. Report by the United States National Academy of Sciences Committee on Low-Altitude Wind Shear and its Hazard to Aviation: 1983, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., Library of Congress No. 83-63100. 2. ICAO, 1974: Report of the Eighth Air Navigation Conference (Doc 9101), Montréal. ___________________ Suzanne TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Chapter 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1-1 Chapter 2. Characteristics of low-level wind shear .................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Wind ..................................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Spatial variation of wind ....................................................................................................... 2-1 2.3 Calculation of wind shear ....................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Warm-Core Formation in Tropical Storm Humberto (2001)
    APRIL 2012 D O L L I N G A N D B A R N E S 1177 Warm-Core Formation in Tropical Storm Humberto (2001) KLAUS DOLLING AND GARY M. BARNES University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii (Manuscript received 27 July 2011, in final form 18 October 2011) ABSTRACT At 0600 UTC 22 September 2001, Humberto was a tropical depression with a minimum central pressure of 1010 hPa. Twelve hours later, when the first global positioning system dropwindsondes (GPS sondes) were jettisoned, Humberto’s minimum central pressure was 1000 hPa and it had attained tropical storm strength. Thirty GPS sondes, radar from the WP-3D, and in situ aircraft measurements are utilized to observe ther- modynamic structures in Humberto and their relationship to stratiform and convective elements during the early stage of the formation of an eye. The analysis of Tropical Storm Humberto offers a new view of the pre-wind-induced surface heat exchange (pre-WISHE) stage of tropical cyclone evolution. Humberto contained a mesoscale convective vortex (MCV) similar to observations of other developing tropical systems. The MCV advects the exhaust from deep con- vection in the form of an anvil cyclonically over the low-level circulation center. On the trailing edge of the anvil an area of mesoscale descent induces dry adiabatic warming in the lower troposphere. The nascent warm core at low levels causes the initial drop in pressure at the surface and acts to cap the boundary layer (BL). As BL air flows into the nascent eye, the energy content increases until the energy is released from under the cap on the down shear side of the warm core in the form of vigorous cumulonimbi, which become the nascent eyewall.
    [Show full text]
  • Mesoscale Convective Complexes: an Overview by Harold Reynolds a Report Submitted in Conformity with the Requirements for the De
    Mesoscale Convective Complexes: An Overview By Harold Reynolds A report submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in the University of Toronto © Harold Reynolds 1990 Table of Contents 1. What is a Mesoscale Convective Complex?........................................................................................ 3 2. Why Study Mesoscale Convective Complexes?..................................................................................3 3. The Internal Structure and Life Cycle of an MCC...............................................................................4 3.1 Introduction.................................................................................................................................... 4 3.2 Genesis........................................................................................................................................... 5 3.3 Growth............................................................................................................................................6 3.4 Maturity and Decay........................................................................................................................ 7 3.5 Heat and Moisture Budgets............................................................................................................ 8 4. Precipitation......................................................................................................................................... 8 5. Mesoscale Warm-Core Vortices.......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 Mesoscale Processes and Severe Convective Weather
    CHAPTER 3 JOHNSON AND MAPES Chapter 3 Mesoscale Processes and Severe Convective Weather RICHARD H. JOHNSON Department of Atmospheric Science. Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado BRIAN E. MAPES CIRESICDC, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado REVIEW PANEL: David B. Parsons (Chair), K. Emanuel, J. M. Fritsch, M. Weisman, D.-L. Zhang 3.1. Introduction tion, mesoscale phenomena occur on horizontal scales between ten and several hundred kilometers. This Severe convective weather events-tornadoes, hail­ range generally encompasses motions for which both storms, high winds, flash floods-are inherently mesoscale ageostrophic advections and Coriolis effects are im­ phenomena. While the large-scale flow establishes envi­ portant (Emanuel 1986). In general, we apply such a ronmental conditions favorable for severe weather, pro­ definition here; however, strict application is difficult cesses on the mesoscale initiate such storms, affect their since so many mesoscale phenomena are "multiscale." evolution, and influence their environment. A rich variety For example, a -100-km-Iong gust front can be less of mesocale processes are involved in severe weather, than -1 km across. The triggering of a storm by the ranging from environmental preconditioning to storm initi­ collision of gust fronts can actually occur on a ation to feedback of convection on the environment. In the -lOO-m scale (the microscale). Nevertheless, we will space available, it is not possible to treat all of these treat this overall process (and others similar to it) as processes in detail. Rather, we will introduce s~veral mesoscale since gust fronts are generally regarded as general classifications of mesoscale processes relatmg to mesoscale phenomena.
    [Show full text]
  • Synoptic Conditions Favorable for the Formation of the 15 July 1995 Southeastern Canada/Northeastern U.S
    SYNOPTIC CONDITIONS FAVORABLE FOR THE FORMATION OF THE 15 JULY 1995 SOUTHEASTERN CANADA/NORTHEASTERN U.S. DERECHO EVENT Mace L. Bentley Climatology Research Laboratory Department of Geography The University of Georgia Athens, Georgia Abstract On 15 July 1995, a derecho-producing mesoscale convective system inflicted considerable damage through southeastern Canada and the northeastern U.S. The synoptic-scale environ­ ment that precluded and persisted during this event is examined \ using swface and upper-air observations, satellite imagery v""--- and numerical model data. Evidence suggests that low-level ~~- - . -,.~ .... moisture inflow and forcing were major factors in initiating \ .-..... ~".... ". and sustaining this progressive warm season derecho event. : "?-.,. ~.:"... Favorable upper-level dynamics produced by jet streak induced Kingston. Ontario circulations were also found over the region. Products from ..------------.:t i the Eta model run initialized 12 hours prior to the event were ". used in the study to fill in between the 0000 UTC and 1200 UTC upper-air sounding times. Manipulation of these data sets was accomplished using GEMPAK 5.2.1. Calculation of 850 hPa moisture transport vectors andfrontogenesis were found to be particularly useful in determining the derecho producing mesoscale convective system's genesis and propagation regions. Future investiga­ tions of these systems should employ these techniques in order to assess their forecast applications. Fig. 1. Approximate track of the DMCS cloud shield on 15 July 1995. 1. Introduction In the early morning hours of 15 July 1995, a derecho­ producing mesoscale convective system (hereafter, DMCS) moved from southern Canada through the northeastern United States (Fig. 1). Widespread wind damage was reported through­ out the Northeast.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Basic Elements of Thunderstorm Forecasting
    (] NOAA TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NWS CR-69 SOME BASIC ELEMENTS OF THUNDERSTORM FORECASTING Richard P. McNulty National Weather Service Forecast Office Topeka, Kansas May 1983 UNITED STATES I Nalion•l Oceanic and I National Weather DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Almospheric Adminislralion Service Malcolm Baldrige. Secretary John V. Byrne, Adm1mstrator Richard E. Hallgren. Director SOME BASIC ELEMENTS OF THUNDERSTORM FORECASTING 1. INTRODUCTION () Convective weather phenomena occupy a very important part of a Weather Service office's forecast and warning responsibilities. Severe thunderstorms require a critical response in the form of watches and warnings. (A severe thunderstorm by National Weather Service definition is one that produces wind gusts of 50 knots or greater, hail of 3/4 inch diameter or larger, and/or tornadoes.) Nevertheless, heavy thunderstorms, those just below severe in­ ·tensity or those producing copious rainfall, also require a certain degree of response in the form of statements and often staffing. (These include thunder­ storms producing hail of any size and/or wind gusts of 35 knots or greater, or storms producing sufficiently intense rainfall to possess a potential for flash flooding.) It must be realized that heavy thunderstorms can have as much or more impact on the public, and require as much action by a forecast office, as do severe thunderstorms. For the purpose of this paper the term "signi­ ficant convection" will refer to a combination of these two thunderstorm classes. · It is the premise of this paper that significant convection, whether heavy or severe, develops from similar atmospheric situations. For effective opera­ tions, forecasters at Weather Service offices should be familiar with those factors which produce significant convection.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation
    14.4 INVESTIGATION OF MESOSCALE PRESSURE AND TEMPERATURE TRANSIENTS ASSOCIATED WITH BOW ECHOES Rebecca D. Adams∗ and Richard H. Johnson Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 1. INTRODUCTION over the entire state, available over the past 13 years. For the purposes of this study, only the years 2002 Bow echoes have been an established part of the through 2005 were examined, to correspond with literature since a 1978 technical report by Fujita– available radar data. The diurnal cycle was then who not only coined the term, but also created a removed from the pressure observations; they were conceptual model showcasing the lifecycle of these also corrected to a constant height (356.5 m, av- systems. The bow echo’s association with severe erage height of all stations) using virtual tempera- winds has also been both well-studied and well- ture. In addition, a high-pass Lanczos filter (Duchon documented, from Fujita’s original work to the 1979) was run on the data to remove all the longer, present. However, very little work has focused on synoptic timescales. Following the definition pro- surface features, such as pressure and temperature, vided in the American Meteorological Society Glos- associated with these storms. While the arrange- sary (2000), the upper (longer) end of the meso- ment of these parameters as associated with squall timescale is the pendulum day, which for average lines has become highly recognizable (including the Oklahoma latitude is 41.2 hours in length. Thus, mesohigh, cold pool, and wake low; Johnson & the Lanczos filter was run to retain all features with Hamilton 1988, Loehrer & Johnson 1995), it is still a period shorter than this.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded 10/01/21 08:47 AM UTC 2062 JOURNAL of the ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES VOLUME 57 Et Al
    1JULY 2000 BRYAN AND FRITSCH 2061 Diabatically Driven Discrete Propagation of Surface Fronts: A Numerical Analysis GEORGE H. BRYAN AND J. MICHAEL FRITSCH Department of Meteorology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania (Manuscript received 2 July 1998, in ®nal form 30 August 1999) ABSTRACT Discrete frontal propagation has been identi®ed as a process whereby a surface front discontinuously moves forward, without evidence of frontal passage across a mesoscale region. Numerical simulations are employed to examine the upper-level evolution of a discrete frontal propagation event and to explore the processes that were responsible for the discrete movement. Model results indicate that a frontal pressure trough was not able to penetrate through a deep surface-based layer of cool air created by a precipitating convective system several hundred kilometers in advance of the front. Meanwhile, a new low-level baroclinic zone formed well ahead of the front along the southern side of the cool layer. As the midlevel front moved continuously over the cool layer, a new low-level front developed in the new baroclinic zone and the original low-level front dissipated. At the surface, the simulated front did not pass through the cool layer. Frontogenesis terms reveal that the prefrontal circulation that becomes the new frontal circulation initially forms directly from diabatic frontogenesis. Daytime heating in the prefrontal boundary layer and cooling from thunderstorms combine to create a thermal gradient and a mesoscale pressure perturbation. Winds turn in response to the altered pressure ®eld and form a convergent boundary, resulting in kinematic frontogenesis. The boundary subsequently undergoes rapid intensi®cation.
    [Show full text]
  • Storm Evolution and Transition Into a Bow Echo
    VOL. 58, NO.13 JOURNAL OF THE ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES 1JULY 2001 Numerical Simulation of Tornadogenesis in a High-Precipitation Supercell. Part I: Storm Evolution and Transition into a Bow Echo CATHERINE A. FINLEY,* W. R. COTTON, AND R. A. PIELKE SR. Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado (Manuscript received 27 August 1998, in ®nal form 16 November 2000) ABSTRACT A nested grid primitive equation model (RAMS version 3b) was used to simulate a high-precipitation (HP) supercell, which produced two weak tornadoes. Six telescoping nested grids allowed atmospheric ¯ows ranging from the synoptic scale down to the tornadic scale to be represented in the simulation. All convection in the simulation was initiated with resolved vertical motion and subsequent condensation±latent heating from the model microphysics; no warm bubbles or cumulus parameterizations were used. Part I of this study focuses on the simulated storm evolution and its transition into a bow echo. The simulation initially produced a classic supercell that developed at the intersection between a stationary front and an out¯ow boundary. As the simulation progressed, additional storms developed and interacted with the main storm to produce a single supercell. This storm had many characteristics of an HP supercell and eventually evolved into a bow echo with a rotating comma-head structure. An analysis of the storm's transition into a bow echo revealed that the interaction between convective cells triggered a series of events that played a crucial role in the transition. The simulated storm structure and evolution differed signi®cantly from that of classic supercells produced by idealized simulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Meteorological Characteristics of Significant Tornado Events
    FEBRUARY 2002 NOTES AND CORRESPONDENCE 155 Some Meteorological Characteristics of Signi®cant Tornado Events Occurring in Proximity to Flash Flooding JOSEPH A. ROGASH NOAA/NWS/Weather Forecast Of®ce, El Paso, Texas JONATHAN RACY NOAA/NWS/Storm Prediction Center, Norman, Oklahoma 9 February 2001 and 5 September 2001 ABSTRACT A study was performed to determine meteorological aspects of environments in which thunderstorms produced both strong or violent tornadoes and ¯ash ¯oods within a limited temporal and spatial domain. It was found that the overwhelming majority of these episodes occurred in the spring and summer months and during the afternoon and evening hours. In most instances, at least some of the tornadoes were present when ¯ash ¯ooding was in progress. The ambient environment usually included an air mass that exhibited both relatively high convective instability and abundant lower-tropospheric moisture, including an average most-unstable CAPE of 3200 J kg21 and mean surface dewpoint and precipitable water values of 708F (218C) and 41 mm (1.6 in.), respectively. Storm-relative helicity magnitudes indicated that the vertical wind shear ranged from marginally to moderately favorable for supercell formation in all cases. Surface patterns for each episode were generally similar to patterns earlier studies determined to be frequently attendant with ¯ash ¯ooding, in which preexisting surface boundaries acted to focus deep convection. Most events also occurred east of an approaching and well- de®ned upper-tropospheric trough and in the left-front or right-rear quadrant of an upper-level jet streak in which upward vertical motion is usually present. 1. Introduction strong and violent tornadoes and excessive rain pose an exceptional hazard to both life and property, the ability Deep convection and associated weather phenomena to anticipate and identify such multiphenomena events remain a forecasting challenge for operational meteo- is critical to the mission of operational meteorologists.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 15, Part 1 What Are Thunderstorms? Ordinary
    Chapter 15, Part 1 Thunderstorms What are thunderstorms? • Thunderstorms are simply storms containing thunder and lightning. • Sometimes also gusty winds, heavy rain, or hail. • Categorized as – Ordinary – short lived, rarely produce strong winds or hail – Severe – high winds, flash floods, damaging hail, and even tornadoes Ordinary Thunderstorms • There are three stages of an ordinary thunderstorm: cumulus, mature, dissipating. 1 Cumulus Stage • Warm humid air rises, cools, and condenses into cumulus cloud(s) • Sometimes cloud evaporates in dry air, but then a new cloud grows higher. • Condensing water releases latent heat making cloud warmer than air around it. • Insufficient time for precipitation to form. • Updrafts keep water droplets and ice crystals suspended. Mature Thunderstorm • Entrainment – dryer colder air Anvil shape at drawn in. Sometimes rain drops stable region. evaporate further cooling air. • Creates downdraft. • Cell = updraft + downdraft. • Most storms several cells (~1hr). • Storm most intense with heavy rain and sometimes small hail. • Cold air at onset of precipitation. • Top reaching stable region leads to anvil shape. Picture of Mature Thunderstorm • Note anvil top. 2 Overshoot • Updrafts can be so strong than the cloud rises into the stable region of the atmosphere. Dissipating Stage • Updrafts weaken and downdrafts dominate. • Light precipitation, weaker winds. • Down drafts can feed other updrafts, creating multicell storms (common). • At end of storm surface temperature can be much cooler (10-20oF), but rain evaporating increases moisture. Dissipating Thunderstorm • Most of the lower half of cloud has evaporated leaving only cirrus anvil top. 3 A Multicell Storm • Middle cell is mature stage, right cell in cumulus stage, and left cell is almost mature.
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitled. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6* x 9* black arxf white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. Bell & Howell Information and Learning 300 North Zfteb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA UMI 800-521-0600 UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE A PSEUDO-DUAL-DOPPLER ANALYSIS OF CYCLIC TORNADOGENESIS A Dissertation SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By DAVID C. DOWELL Norman, Oklahoma 2000 UMI Number 9956999 UMI UMI Microform9956999 Copyright 2000 by Bell & Howell Information and Learning Company.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Hail Size on Simulated Supercell Storms
    1596 JOURNAL OF THE ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES VOLUME 61 The Impact of Hail Size on Simulated Supercell Storms SUSAN C. VAN DEN HEEVER AND WILLIAM R. COTTON Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado (Manuscript received 14 November 2002, in ®nal form 15 January 2004) ABSTRACT Variations in storm microstructure due to updraft strength, liquid water content, and the presence of dry layers, wind shear, and cloud nucleating aerosol concentrations are likely to lead to changes in hail sizes within deep convective storms. The focus of this paper is to determine how the overall dynamics and microphysical structure of deep convective storms are affected if hail sizes are somehow altered in a storm environment that is otherwise the same. The sensitivity of simulated supercell storms to hail size distributions is investigated by systematically varying the mean hail diameter from 3 mm to 1 cm using the Regional Atmospheric Modeling System (RAMS) model. Increasing the mean hail diameter results in a hail size distribution in which the number concentration of smaller hailstones is decreased, while that of the larger hailstones is increased. This shift in the hail size distribution as a result of increasing the mean hail diameter leads to an increase in the mean terminal fall speed of the hail species and to reduced melting and evaporation rates. The sensitivity simulations demonstrate that the low-level downdrafts are stronger, the cold pools are deeper and more intense, the left-moving updraft is shorter-lived, the right-moving storm is stronger but not as steady, and the low-level vertical vorticity is greater in the cases with smaller hail stones.
    [Show full text]