DOCSLIB.ORG

Tornadoes and Downbursts in the Context of Generalized Planetary Scales

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tornadoes and Downbursts in the Context of Generalized Planetary Scales Tornadoes and Downbursts in the Context of Generalized Planetary Scales T . THEODORE FUJITA Reprinted from JouRNAL OF THE ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, Vol. 38, No. 8, August 1981 American t-{eteorological Society Printed in l". S. /\. Reprinted from JOURNAL OF THE ATMOSPHERIC ScIE:-iCES, Vol. 38, No. 8, August 1981 American Meteorological Society . · ! Printed in U. S. A. ' Tornadoes and Downbursts in the Context of Generalized Planetary Scales T. THEODORE FUJITA Department of Geophysical Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 (Manuscript received 24 December 1980, in final form 2 February 1981) ABSTRACT In order to cover a wide range of horizontal dimensiqns of airflow, the author proposes a series of five scales, .maso, meso, miso (to be read as my-so), ·moso and muso arranged in the order of the vowels, A, E, I, 0, U. The dimen~ions decrease by two orders of magnitude per scale, beginning with the planet's equator length chosen to be the maximum dimension of masoscale for each planet. ' Mesoscale highs. and lows were described on the basis of mesoanalyses, while sub-mesoscale dis­ turbances were depicted by cataloging over 20 000 photographs of wind effects taken from low-flying aircraft during the past 15 years. Various motion thus classified into these scales led to a conclusion that extreme winds induced by thunderstorms are associated with misoscale and mososcale airflow spawned by the parent, mesoscale disturbances. 1. Historical overview of mesoscale Severe weather events associated with small-scale disturbances, regarded as noise in daily weather The invention of the barometer led people to re­ analyses, became the focal point of storm research­ late the daily weather with barometric readings; high ers [a micro study by Williams (1948), pressure pressure symbolizes fine weather; low pressure, bad pulsations by Brunk (1949), a micro-analytical study weather; and extremely low-pressure storms. Dis­ by Fujita (1950), etc.]. covery of air masses and fronts in the early 1920' s by · The term meso, designating the subsynoptic the Norwegian school altered the simple-minded noise,. was first used by Ligda (1951) in emphasizing pressure-weather relationship into so-called synop­ the scale of radar echoes. Since then U.S. Army tic analysis, relating weather patterns with fronts Signal Corps used frequently but internally the term and cyclones. ''mesometeorological'' to identify small-scale weather Local storms in continental Europe and the phenomena which could affect the Army's operations. United States, thunderstorms in particular, are due Meanwhile, U.S. Weather Bureau defined the to. intense . heating in warm seasons and are not "mesoscale" to be centered between 10 and 100 always related to frontal activities. Since the 1920's, mi, leading to the publications of mesometeorologi­ both frontal and non-frontal thunderstorms were in­ cal papers [mesometeorological study of squall lines vestigated by various researchers: heat thunder­ by Fujita (1955) and mesoanalysis by Fujita, New­ storms by Brooks (1922), cold-air production by stein and Tepper (1956), both with color pages]. Suckstorff (1938), thunderstorm highs by Schaffer The original mesometeorological scale was shifted (1947) and many others. to 10-100 km after the adoption of the metric As air traffic increased in the 1940's, squall-line system. The Glossary of Meteorology (1959). de­ and thunderstorm-related accidents and difficulties fines synoptic as "in general, pertaining to or af­ . occurred in various parts of the world. Fact-finding fording an overall view.'' The key words for synop­ networks covering local areas were operated in both tic in meteorology are "overall" and " simul­ Germany and Japan. Some of their results had been taneous" data collected for weather analyses. classified until the end of the second world war. Petterssen (1956), applying this fundamental defini­ These networks were Lindenberger Boennetz tion, suggested the use of "macrosynoptic", (Squall Network) in 1939-41, 20 km east-southeast "mesosynoptic" and "microsynoptic", thus ex­ of Berlin reported by Koschmieder (1955) and tending the concept of the conventional term Maebashi Raiu Kansokumo (Maebashi Thunder­ "synoptic" into mesoscale and microscale. storm Network) in 1940, 100 km northwest of Tokyo Byers (1959) and Tepper (1959) attempted to; reported by .Fujiwara (1943). The Thunderstorm generalize the scale of atmospheric motion through Project in 1946 (Florida) and 1947 (Ohio) operated five orders of magnitude, ranging between a few the· most comprehensive data-collection networks, tenths of a kilometer to the dimensions of long as reported by Byers and Braham (1949). · waves. 0022-4928/81/081511-24$10. 00 1511 © 1981 American Meteorological Society 1512 JOURNAL OF THE ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES VOLUME 38 HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS IOO"""km IOl'Mkm I OOOkm IOO km IOkm l km IOOm IOm Im IOcm fem Imm YEAR 1951 L1 odo MESOME TEOROLOGICAL 1955 Fu1 ito MESOMETEOROLOG!CAL SCALE 19 56 Fu'ito,News1e1n Teoper M£SOANALYS IS 1956 Pe 11er\ sen MACROSYNOPTIC MESOSYNPTIC MICROSYNOPTjC 1959 BvtrS MACROMET.: SY NOP.MET. i MESOMETEOROLOGY MICROMET. 1959 Teooer MACROSCALE i MESOSCALE LOCAL SCALE 1959 Glossary AMS MACROME T. ; CYCLONE SCALE : MESOMET EOROLOGY : MICROMET. 1963 0Quro I ' II Ill IV v p ' 1963 Fu 11 0 NelwOfk Scale : MESO a ' r 1970s Modelln11 Scale . /3 y 1972 Glossary, Brit ish SY NOPTIC MET. ME SOMETEOROLOGY MICROMET. 1976 Aoee Snow Clore I I I !1 I Ill I IV I v VI 1979 Fu i.to I M AS 0 I ME S V I M I SO I M O SO I MUS O I 1979 Hobbs Macro a I /3 I Mesa a I /3 I y I Micro a I /3 I y I 8 I < 1 2 7 WA VE NUMBER 10° 2 " • 10 10 10' 10· 10' 1p• 10 10• 10• JPIO MASOsco le I MESOscole I MISOscole I MOSOsco le I MGSOscole I 400km 4km 4 0m 4mm E M2J9!>!9b f)1_e_s_o_hjgb f)1J~QIJ.'9b *M9JQl]igb 40<m * f)1_U§Qf)igQ ->c \0 PRESSURE DOME IHydrostoflc !'-. I 0 'tr £x1stence not conflfmed ' H IGHS 0 I ANTICVCLONE I ' I PRESSURE NOSE INonhydrostollc '<t 0 I : ' ' II ' : ---'M1croburs1L.- ' I ; * LAB HIGH Cl: I ' I DOWN BURS T ' ' '.·1Burst Swath ! ! ' I 2 ' 'I ' <t ,' . ' ' ' I' ' :::i I' BURST FRONT j ../iswoth Front j ' ' ' i ' 0 I FRONT I ' ' I LAB FRO NT i l.L.i ' FRON TS u.. GUST FRONT 0 i I l: f-- ! CYCLONE I··--· ····f MESOCYCLONE I· ------! T O RNA DO Cb I ~ IHURRICANE! -........... * ::::::::J .. ·1 SUCTION VOR TEX I LAB VORTE X l.L.i I I LOWS ...J ~-Q..S..OfYf:tC?.flt! 400km ~-e_S,9fYf!tlflt! 4km ~j ~QCYflOJ!..~ 40m ~-o_s_o_s:yf!~IJ~ 40cm ~-U~Q~ Yf lO_n_ft 4mm A SCALE I E SCALE I I SCALE I 0 SCALE I u SCAL E I 5 4 3 2 1 1 3 10 10 10 10 . 10 10° 10· 10-2 10" 10-4 10·5 km F1G. I. A diagram showing the historical definitions of the mesoscale along with the five scales, maso-, meso- , miso-, moso- and musoscale proposed by the author. In their articles on severe local storms, Ogura suspected rotation was confirmed by Fujita et al. (1963) and Fujita (1963) independently suggested (1972) on the basis of the swirl pattern of sweet­ subclassifications of scales for every " one order of potato vines in the wake of a tornado near Tokyo, magnitude" in horizontal dimensions. Ogura's Japan. (1963) Group Numbers I, II, III, IV and V are In an attempt to accommodate the dimensions of centered at 10 000, 1000, 100, 10 and I km, respec­ tornadoes and suction vortices, Agee et al. (1976) tively, with corresponding phenomena ranging be­ proposed a subclassification of mesoscale into I-VI tween planetary waves to Rayleigh-type convec­ which extend through four orders of magnitude be­ tions. Meanwhile, Fujita (1963) emphasized a need tween 10 m and 100 km. for three-density networks with station densities classified into meso-a, meso-/3, and meso-y for depicting all types of mesoscale disturbances. Cur­ rently, the grid size of numerical modeling of mesoscale phenomena is categorized into a, 13, and y which correspond to Ogura's groups III, IV and V, respectively. The diameter of tornadoes rarely exceeds 1000 m or the meso-y scale. Fujita 1 found that subtornado­ scale vortices, called "suction vortices" orbit around the core of large tornadoes. These vortices are one order of magnitude smaller than their parent tornado. Initiall y, Fujita ( 1970) used the term "suction spot" with a remark that there are evidences that suction spots are in a state of rotation. The 1 Fujita, T . T ., 1971: Proposed mechanism of suction spots FIG. 2. Cloud-motion vectors around Jupiter's Great Red Spot, accompanied by tornadoes. Preprints 7th Conf. Severe lorn/ computed by the author based on four pictures taken by Voyager I Storms , Kansas City, MO, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 208-213. on 2 and 3 February 1979. AUGUST 1981 T . THEODORE FUJITA 1513 Fig. 1 summarizes the geometric scales proposed by various researchers, along with both confirmed an.d unconfirmed disturbances associated with highs, fronts and lows. It is seen that there are two schemes of scaling atmospheric motion. The first scheme is based on the familiar sequence, macro, meso and micro with their dimensional increments, approx­ imately two orders of magnitude each. The second scheme designates scales in either numerical or alphabetic (Greek) order. Ogura's I, II, III, ... and meso-a, meso-,B , meso-y are separated by one order of magnitude while Agee et al. 's I, II, III, ... , by nonuniform scale separations ranging between approximately one-third to one order of magnitude. The macro, meso, micro sequence of the first scheme is useful in identifying the subfields of meteorology, because each scale extends through approximately two orders of magnitudes, including a variety of important scales of motion.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • What Are We Doing with (Or To) the F-Scale?
    5.6 What Are We Doing with (or to) the F-Scale? Daniel McCarthy, Joseph Schaefer and Roger Edwards NOAA/NWS Storm Prediction Center Norman, OK 1. Introduction Dr. T. Theodore Fujita developed the F- Scale, or Fujita Scale, in 1971 to provide a way to compare mesoscale windstorms by estimating the wind speed in hurricanes or tornadoes through an evaluation of the observed damage (Fujita 1971). Fujita grouped wind damage into six categories of increasing devastation (F0 through F5). Then for each damage class, he estimated the wind speed range capable of causing the damage. When deriving the scale, Fujita cunningly bridged the speeds between the Beaufort Scale (Huler 2005) used to estimate wind speeds through hurricane intensity and the Mach scale for near sonic speed winds. Fujita developed the following equation to estimate the wind speed associated with the damage produced by a tornado: Figure 1: Fujita's plot of how the F-Scale V = 14.1(F+2)3/2 connects with the Beaufort Scale and Mach number. From Fujita’s SMRP No. 91, 1971. where V is the speed in miles per hour, and F is the F-category of the damage. This Amazingly, the University of Oklahoma equation led to the graph devised by Fujita Doppler-On-Wheels measured up to 318 in Figure 1. mph flow some tens of meters above the ground in this tornado (Burgess et. al, 2002). Fujita and his staff used this scale to map out and analyze 148 tornadoes in the Super 2. Early Applications Tornado Outbreak of 3-4 April 1974.
    [Show full text]
  • Squall Lines: Meteorology, Skywarn Spotting, & a Brief Look at the 18
    Squall Lines: Meteorology, Skywarn Spotting, & A Brief Look At The 18 June 2010 Derecho Gino Izzi National Weather Service, Chicago IL Outline • Meteorology 301: Squall lines – Brief review of thunderstorm basics – Squall lines – Squall line tornadoes – Mesovorticies • Storm spotting for squall lines • Brief Case Study of 18 June 2010 Event Thunderstorm Ingredients • Moisture – Gulf of Mexico most common source locally Thunderstorm Ingredients • Lifting Mechanism(s) – Fronts – Jet Streams – “other” boundaries – topography Thunderstorm Ingredients • Instability – Measure of potential for air to accelerate upward – CAPE: common variable used to quantify magnitude of instability < 1000: weak 1000-2000: moderate 2000-4000: strong 4000+: extreme Thunderstorms Thunderstorms • Moisture + Instability + Lift = Thunderstorms • What kind of thunderstorms? – Single Cell – Multicell/Squall Line – Supercells Thunderstorm Types • What determines T-storm Type? – Short/simplistic answer: CAPE vs Shear Thunderstorm Types • What determines T-storm Type? (Longer/more complex answer) – Lot we don’t know, other factors (besides CAPE/shear) include • Strength of forcing • Strength of CAP • Shear WRT to boundary • Other stuff Thunderstorm Types • Multi-cell squall lines most common type of severe thunderstorm type locally • Most common type of severe weather is damaging winds • Hail and brief tornadoes can occur with most the intense squall lines Squall Lines & Spotting Squall Line Terminology • Squall Line : a relatively narrow line of thunderstorms, often
    [Show full text]
  • 19.4 Updated Mobile Radar Climatology of Supercell
    19.4 UPDATED MOBILE RADAR CLIMATOLOGY OF SUPERCELL TORNADO STRUCTURES AND DYNAMICS Curtis R. Alexander* and Joshua M. Wurman Center for Severe Weather Research, Boulder, Colorado 1. INTRODUCTION evolution of angular momentum and vorticity near the surface in many of the tornado cases is also High-resolution mobile radar observations of providing some insight into possible modes of supercell tornadoes have been collected by the scale contraction for tornadogenesis and failure. Doppler On Wheels (DOWs) platform between 1995 and present. The result of this ongoing effort 2. DATA is a large observational database spanning over 150 separate supercell tornadoes with a typical The DOWs have collected observations in and data resolution of O(50 m X 50 m X 50 m), near supercell tornadoes from 1995 through 2008 updates every O(60 s) and measurements within including the fields of Doppler velocity, received 20 m of the surface (Wurman et al. 1997; Wurman power, normalized coherent power, radar 1999, 2001). reflectivity, coherent reflectivity and spectral width (Wurman et al. 1997). Stemming from this database is a multi-tiered effort to characterize the structure and dynamics of A typical observation is a four-second quasi- the high wind speed environments in and near horizontal scan through a tornado vortex. To date supercell tornadoes. To this end, a suite of there have been over 10000 DOW observations of algorithms is applied to the radar tornado supercell tornadoes comprising over 150 individual observations for quality assurance along with tornadoes. detection, tracking and extraction of kinematic attributes. Data used for this study include DOW supercell tornado observations from 1995-2003 comprising The integration of observations across tornado about 5000 individual observations of 69 different cases in the database is providing an estimate of mesocyclone-associated tornadoes.
    [Show full text]
  • A 10-Year Radar-Based Climatology of Mesoscale Convective System Archetypes and Derechos in Poland
    AUGUST 2020 S U R O W I E C K I A N D T A S Z A R E K 3471 A 10-Year Radar-Based Climatology of Mesoscale Convective System Archetypes and Derechos in Poland ARTUR SUROWIECKI Department of Climatology, University of Warsaw, and Skywarn Poland, Warsaw, Poland MATEUSZ TASZAREK Department of Meteorology and Climatology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland, and National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, Oklahoma, and Skywarn Poland, Warsaw, Poland (Manuscript received 29 December 2019, in final form 3 May 2020) ABSTRACT In this study, a 10-yr (2008–17) radar-based mesoscale convective system (MCS) and derecho climatology for Poland is presented. This is one of the first attempts of a European country to investigate morphological and precipitation archetypes of MCSs as prior studies were mostly based on satellite data. Despite its ubiquity and significance for society, economy, agriculture, and water availability, little is known about the climatological aspects of MCSs over central Europe. Our results indicate that MCSs are not rare in Poland as an annual mean of 77 MCSs and 49 days with MCS can be depicted for Poland. Their lifetime ranges typically from 3 to 6 h, with initiation time around the afternoon hours (1200–1400 UTC) and dissipation stage in the evening (1900–2000 UTC). The most frequent morphological type of MCSs is a broken line (58% of cases), then areal/cluster (25%), and then quasi- linear convective systems (QLCS; 17%), which are usually associated with a bow echo (72% of QLCS). QLCS are the feature with the longest life cycle.
    [Show full text]
  • ESSENTIALS of METEOROLOGY (7Th Ed.) GLOSSARY
    ESSENTIALS OF METEOROLOGY (7th ed.) GLOSSARY Chapter 1 Aerosols Tiny suspended solid particles (dust, smoke, etc.) or liquid droplets that enter the atmosphere from either natural or human (anthropogenic) sources, such as the burning of fossil fuels. Sulfur-containing fossil fuels, such as coal, produce sulfate aerosols. Air density The ratio of the mass of a substance to the volume occupied by it. Air density is usually expressed as g/cm3 or kg/m3. Also See Density. Air pressure The pressure exerted by the mass of air above a given point, usually expressed in millibars (mb), inches of (atmospheric mercury (Hg) or in hectopascals (hPa). pressure) Atmosphere The envelope of gases that surround a planet and are held to it by the planet's gravitational attraction. The earth's atmosphere is mainly nitrogen and oxygen. Carbon dioxide (CO2) A colorless, odorless gas whose concentration is about 0.039 percent (390 ppm) in a volume of air near sea level. It is a selective absorber of infrared radiation and, consequently, it is important in the earth's atmospheric greenhouse effect. Solid CO2 is called dry ice. Climate The accumulation of daily and seasonal weather events over a long period of time. Front The transition zone between two distinct air masses. Hurricane A tropical cyclone having winds in excess of 64 knots (74 mi/hr). Ionosphere An electrified region of the upper atmosphere where fairly large concentrations of ions and free electrons exist. Lapse rate The rate at which an atmospheric variable (usually temperature) decreases with height. (See Environmental lapse rate.) Mesosphere The atmospheric layer between the stratosphere and the thermosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • Tropical Cyclone Mesoscale Circulation Families
    DOMINANT TROPICAL CYCLONE OUTER RAINBANDS RELATED TO TORNADIC AND NON-TORNADIC MESOSCALE CIRCULATION FAMILIES Scott M. Spratt and David W. Sharp National Weather Service Melbourne, Florida 1. INTRODUCTION Doppler (WSR-88D) radar sampling of Tropical Cyclone (TC) outer rainbands over recent years has revealed a multitude of embedded mesoscale circulations (e.g. Zubrick and Belville 1993, Cammarata et al. 1996, Spratt el al. 1997, Cobb and Stuart 1998). While a majority of the observed circulations exhibited small horizontal and vertical characteristics similar to extra- tropical mini supercells (Burgess et al. 1995, Grant and Prentice 1996), some were more typical of those common to the Great Plains region (Sharp et al. 1997). During the past year, McCaul and Weisman (1998) successfully simulated the observed spectrum of TC circulations through variance of buoyancy and shear parameters. This poster will serve to document mesoscale circulation families associated with six TC's which made landfall within Florida since 1994. While tornadoes were not associated with all of the circulations (manual not algorithm defined), those which exhibited persistent and relatively strong rotation did often correlate with touchdowns (Table 1). Similarities between tornado- producing circulations will be discussed in Section 7. Contained within this document are 0.5 degree base reflectivity and storm relative velocity images from the Melbourne (KMLB; Gordon, Erin, Josephine, Georges), Jacksonville (KJAX; Allison), and Eglin Air Force Base (KEVX; Opal) WSR-88D sites. Arrows on the images indicate cells which produced persistent rotation. 2. TC GORDON (94) MESO CHARACTERISTICS KMLB radar surveillance of TC Gordon revealed two occurrences of mesoscale families (first period not shown).
    [Show full text]
  • Quasi-Linear Convective System Mesovorticies and Tornadoes
    Quasi-Linear Convective System Mesovorticies and Tornadoes RYAN ALLISS & MATT HOFFMAN Meteorology Program, Iowa State University, Ames ABSTRACT Quasi-linear convective system are a common occurance in the spring and summer months and with them come the risk of them producing mesovorticies. These mesovorticies are small and compact and can cause isolated and concentrated areas of damage from high winds and in some cases can produce weak tornadoes. This paper analyzes how and when QLCSs and mesovorticies develop, how to identify a mesovortex using various tools from radar, and finally a look at how common is it for a QLCS to put spawn a tornado across the United States. 1. Introduction Quasi-linear convective systems, or squall lines, are a line of thunderstorms that are Supercells have always been most feared oriented linearly. Sometimes, these lines of when it has come to tornadoes and as they intense thunderstorms can feature a bowed out should be. However, quasi-linear convective systems can also cause tornadoes. Squall lines and bow echoes are also known to cause tornadoes as well as other forms of severe weather such as high winds, hail, and microbursts. These are powerful systems that can travel for hours and hundreds of miles, but the worst part is tornadoes in QLCSs are hard to forecast and can be highly dangerous for the public. Often times the supercells within the QLCS cause tornadoes to become rain wrapped, which are tornadoes that are surrounded by rain making them hard to see with the naked eye. This is why understanding QLCSs and how they can produce mesovortices that are capable of producing tornadoes is essential to forecasting these tornadic events that can be highly dangerous.
    [Show full text]
  • Storm Spotting – Solidifying the Basics PROFESSOR PAUL SIRVATKA COLLEGE of DUPAGE METEOROLOGY Focus on Anticipating and Spotting
    Storm Spotting – Solidifying the Basics PROFESSOR PAUL SIRVATKA COLLEGE OF DUPAGE METEOROLOGY HTTP://WEATHER.COD.EDU Focus on Anticipating and Spotting • What do you look for? • What will you actually see? • Can you identify what is going on with the storm? Is Gilbert married? Hmmmmm….rumor has it….. Its all about the updraft! Not that easy! • Various types of storms and storm structures. • A tornado is a “big sucky • Obscuration of important thing” and underneath the features make spotting updraft is where it forms. difficult. • So find the updraft! • The closer you are to a storm the more difficult it becomes to make these identifications. Conceptual models Reality is much harder. Basic Conceptual Model Sometimes its easy! North Central Illinois, 2-28-17 (Courtesy of Matt Piechota) Other times, not so much. Reality usually is far more complicated than our perfect pictures Rain Free Base Dusty Outflow More like reality SCUD Scattered Cumulus Under Deck Sigh...wall clouds! • Wall clouds help spotters identify where the updraft of a storm is • Wall clouds may or may not be present with tornadic storms • Wall clouds may be seen with any storm with an updraft • Wall clouds may or may not be rotating • Wall clouds may or may not result in tornadoes • Wall clouds should not be reported unless there is strong and easily observable rotation noted • When a clear slot is observed, a well written or transmitted report should say as much Characteristics of a Tornadic Wall Cloud • Surface-based inflow • Rapid vertical motion (scud-sucking) • Persistent • Persistent rotation Clear Slot • The key, however, is the development of a clear slot Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Warm-Core Formation in Tropical Storm Humberto (2001)
    APRIL 2012 D O L L I N G A N D B A R N E S 1177 Warm-Core Formation in Tropical Storm Humberto (2001) KLAUS DOLLING AND GARY M. BARNES University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii (Manuscript received 27 July 2011, in final form 18 October 2011) ABSTRACT At 0600 UTC 22 September 2001, Humberto was a tropical depression with a minimum central pressure of 1010 hPa. Twelve hours later, when the first global positioning system dropwindsondes (GPS sondes) were jettisoned, Humberto’s minimum central pressure was 1000 hPa and it had attained tropical storm strength. Thirty GPS sondes, radar from the WP-3D, and in situ aircraft measurements are utilized to observe ther- modynamic structures in Humberto and their relationship to stratiform and convective elements during the early stage of the formation of an eye. The analysis of Tropical Storm Humberto offers a new view of the pre-wind-induced surface heat exchange (pre-WISHE) stage of tropical cyclone evolution. Humberto contained a mesoscale convective vortex (MCV) similar to observations of other developing tropical systems. The MCV advects the exhaust from deep con- vection in the form of an anvil cyclonically over the low-level circulation center. On the trailing edge of the anvil an area of mesoscale descent induces dry adiabatic warming in the lower troposphere. The nascent warm core at low levels causes the initial drop in pressure at the surface and acts to cap the boundary layer (BL). As BL air flows into the nascent eye, the energy content increases until the energy is released from under the cap on the down shear side of the warm core in the form of vigorous cumulonimbi, which become the nascent eyewall.
    [Show full text]
  • Mesoscale Convective Complexes: an Overview by Harold Reynolds a Report Submitted in Conformity with the Requirements for the De
    Mesoscale Convective Complexes: An Overview By Harold Reynolds A report submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in the University of Toronto © Harold Reynolds 1990 Table of Contents 1. What is a Mesoscale Convective Complex?........................................................................................ 3 2. Why Study Mesoscale Convective Complexes?..................................................................................3 3. The Internal Structure and Life Cycle of an MCC...............................................................................4 3.1 Introduction.................................................................................................................................... 4 3.2 Genesis........................................................................................................................................... 5 3.3 Growth............................................................................................................................................6 3.4 Maturity and Decay........................................................................................................................ 7 3.5 Heat and Moisture Budgets............................................................................................................ 8 4. Precipitation......................................................................................................................................... 8 5. Mesoscale Warm-Core Vortices.......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Enhanced Fujita Tornado Scale
    NCDC: Educational Topics: Enhanced Fujita Scale Page 1 of 3 DOC NOAA NESDIS NCDC > > > Search Field: Search NCDC Education / EF Tornado Scale / Tornado Climatology / Search NCDC The Enhanced Fujita Tornado Scale Wind speeds in tornadoes range from values below that of weak hurricane speeds to more than 300 miles per hour! Unlike hurricanes, which produce wind speeds of generally lesser values over relatively widespread areas (when compared to tornadoes), the maximum winds in tornadoes are often confined to extremely small areas and can vary tremendously over very short distances, even within the funnel itself. The tales of complete destruction of one house next to one that is totally undamaged are true and well-documented. The Original Fujita Tornado Scale In 1971, Dr. T. Theodore Fujita of the University of Chicago devised a six-category scale to classify U.S. tornadoes into six damage categories, called F0-F5. F0 describes the weakest tornadoes and F5 describes only the most destructive tornadoes. The Fujita tornado scale (or the "F-scale") has subsequently become the definitive scale for estimating wind speeds within tornadoes based upon the damage caused by the tornado. It is used extensively by the National Weather Service in investigating tornadoes, by scientists studying the behavior and climatology of tornadoes, and by engineers correlating damage to different types of structures with different estimated tornado wind speeds. The original Fujita scale bridges the gap between the Beaufort Wind Speed Scale and Mach numbers (ratio of the speed of an object to the speed of sound) by connecting Beaufort Force 12 with Mach 1 in twelve steps.
    [Show full text]
  • Mt417 – Week 10
    Mt417 – Week 10 Use of radar for severe weather forecasting Single Cell Storms (pulse severe) • Because the severe weather happens so quickly, these are hard to warn for using radar • Main Radar Signatures: i) Maximum reflectivity core developing at higher levels than other storms ii) Maximum top and maximum reflectivity co- located iii) Rapidly descending core iv) pure divergence or convergence in velocity data Severe cell has its max reflectivity core higher up Z With a descending reflectivity core, you’d see the reds quickly heading down toward the ground with each new scan (typically around 5 minutes apart) Small Scale Winds - Divergence/Convergence - Divergent Signature Often seen at storm top level or near the Note the position of the radar relative to the ground at close velocity signatures. This range to a pulse type is critical for proper storm interpretation of the small scale velocity data. Convergence would show colors reversed Multicells (especially QLCSs– quasi-linear convective systems) • Main Radar Signatures i) Weak echo region (WER) or overhang on inflow side with highest top for the multicell cluster over this area (implies very strong updraft) ii) Strong convergence couplet near inflow boundary Weak Echo Region (left: NWS Western Region; right: NWS JETSTREAM) • Associated with the updraft of a supercell thunderstorm • Strong rising motion with the updraft results in precipitation/ hail echoes being shifted upward • Can be viewed on one radar surface (left) or in the vertical (schematic at right) Crude schematic of
    [Show full text]