Comparative Performance Analysis of Pga Tour and Ontario University Golfers

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Comparative Performance Analysis of Pga Tour and Ontario University Golfers Western University Scholarship@Western Digitized Theses Digitized Special Collections 2011 COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF PGA TOUR AND ONTARIO UNIVERSITY GOLFERS Charles Richard Spear Fitzsimmons Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/digitizedtheses Recommended Citation Fitzsimmons, Charles Richard Spear, "COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF PGA TOUR AND ONTARIO UNIVERSITY GOLFERS" (2011). Digitized Theses. 3290. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/digitizedtheses/3290 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Digitized Special Collections at Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Digitized Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF PGA TOUR AND ONTARIO UNIVERSITY GOLFERS (Thesis format: Monograph) by Charles R. S. Fitzsimmons Graduate Program in Kinesiology A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts The School of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies The University of Western Ontario - London, Ontario, Canada © Charles R. S. Fitzsimmons 2011 1 THE UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO SCHOOL OF GRADUATE AND POSTDOCTORAL STUDIES CERTIFICATE OF EXAMINATION Supervisor Examiners Dr. Albert V. Carrón Dr. Jim Weese Dr. Darwin M. Semotiuk Dr. Riley E. Hinson The thesis by Charles Richard Spear Fitzsimmons entitled: v Comparative Performance Analysis of PGA Tour and Ontario University Golfers is accepted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Date___________________________ ________________________________ Chair of the Thesis Examination Board a ABSTRACT The purposes of the study were to 1) build a model to predict scoring average for a total sample of professional (n = 82) and collegiate (n = 41) golfers using stepwise regression, 2) test the model on the samples independently using hierarchical regression, and 3); examine the significance in performance differences in the two subsamples. Both samples played two tournament rounds at the South Course of Angus Glen Golf Club; the professionals during the 2002 PGA tour Canadian Open and the collegians during the 2010 OUA championship. For the total sample, GIR percentage, putts per round, scrambling percentage and driving accuracy percentage predicted 92% of the variance in scoring average; for professionals and collegians the only the former three performance measures accounted for explained variance for scoring average (80% and 81% respectively). Professionals were significantly superior to the collegians in all four performance indices as well as scoring average. Key words: Golf, Performance analysis, Professionals, PGA Tour, Amateurs, Collegians, Scoring average r 111 DEDICATION I would like to dedicate my thesis in honour of my late father, Richard G. Fitzsimmons. Although he is no longer physically with us, his spirit lives on in our cherished memories of him. Without his never ending lessons in life, academics or sport, I could not have become the person I am now. Thanks Coeur de Lion. I would also like to dedicate my thesis to my mother, Heather, brother, James, grandmother, Jean and grandfather, George. You are the most important people in my life and without your love, support and everlasting confidence in me, I would not have achieved the success I have celebrated or overcome the obstacles that threatened those very achievements. From the bottom of my heart, Thank you. ' 'v IV ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my supervisor Bert Carron for all of his patience and mentoring skill. Bert, I know I may not have been the perfect student and maybe even., pushed your patience from time to time but I have learned incredible amounts from you about academia and life. I hope that we can continue to work together for many years to come, so that one day I may be able to achieve the successes you have over an incredible career. I would like to thank my fellow pupils of Bert—Luc Martin and Kyle Paradis—for their kind words, encouragement and valuable lessons. You guys have guided me into graduate studies and taught me the ropes of being one of Bert’s students. For that, I could never say thank you enough times. I would also like to thank my friends—Mike, Charlie and Sebastian—and my girlfriend—Alyssa—for all the late night conversations we’ve had about my thesis to keep me sane and just for the good times we had to keep me relaxed and enjoying life. You all add something special to my life and it would not be the same without you, Thank you. I would also like to thank the PGA tour. Without access to their ShotLink data through their academic data program this study would not have been possible. Working with the PGA tour has been a dream and I hope this is the beginning of a long lasting and productive relationship. I would also like to thank the OUA and the golf coaches from The University of Western Ontario. To all who were involved in helping collect the amateur data, I cannot thank you enough, this study would not have been possible without your efforts. To Jim v and Mike, the Western coaches, thanks for all you have taught me about life and golf; your everlasting wisdom and zest for life mean that I continually look forward to my time on the golf team each season. ^ vi TABLE OF CONTENTS CERTIFICATE OF EXAMINATION................................................................ ii ABSTRACT............................................................ .................................................. iii DEDICATION.......... .......................... .................................................................... iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS................................................................ v LIST OF TABLES............................... ..................................................................... viii LIST OF FIGURES................. ................................. ix LIST OF APPENDICES....................................................................... ................... x LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS................................................................... ........... xi CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION...:;.,-......... 1 Professional Golf Performance Analysis................................. 2 Amateur Golf Performance Analysis......................................... 16 Professional versus Amateur Golf Performance Analysis....... 19 Overview and Statement of the Problem............................. 22 CHAPTER 2 METHODS............... .......................................... ......................... 24 Participants and Procedure................................ ................... 24 Dependent and Independent Variables...................................... 25 Statistical Analyses....................................... ............................. 25 CHAPTER 3 RESULTS................................................................... 29 Total Sample.-....................................................................;....... 29 Professional Golfers................................................................... 32 Collegiate Golfers................. .......... ......................................... 35 Comparison of Professionals versus Collegians........:.....:....... 40 CHAPTER 4 DISCUSSION................................................. ........................... 44 Limitations and Future Studies.......................................... ........ 52 Conclusions........................... ....................................................... 57 REFERENCES................................... 59 APPENDICES.......... ................................................................................................... 62 CURRICULUM VITA................................................................................................ 70 Vll LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1 Summary of Golf Studies Explaining Performance.............. 11 TABLE 2 Variables Studied and Operational Definitions........................... 27- TABLE 3 Descriptive Statistics for Professionals and Amateurs Individually and Total Sample.................................................... 30 TABLE 4 Pearson Correlations of All Variables for the Total Sample....... 31 TABLE 5 Stepwise Regression for Scoring Average of the Total Sample............................................................................................ 33 .. ^ TABLE 6 Pearson Correlations of All Variables for Professional Golfers........................................ ................................................... 34 TABLE 7 Hierarchical Regression for Scoring Average of Professional Golfers........................ .................................................................. 36 TABLE 8 Pearson Correlations of All Variables for Collegiate Golfers... 38 TABLE 9 Hierarchical Regression for Scoring Average of Collegiate Golfers........................................................................................... 39 ■ .v TABLE 10 Moderated Hierarchical Regression for Main Effects and Interactions for Scoring Average................................................. 41 TABLE 11 MANOVA Results Comparing Professional and Collegian Golfers........................................................................................... 43 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1 ShotLink Graphic........................................................................ 26 LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A Post-Round Performance Statistics.......................................;... 62 APPENDIX B Performance
Recommended publications
  • Auction - Sale 632: Golf Books by the Shelf 01/04/2018 11:00 AM PST
    Auction - Sale 632: Golf Books by the Shelf 01/04/2018 11:00 AM PST Lot Title/Description Lot Title/Description 1 24 Golf Books 3 32 Golf Books Includes:Allen, Peter. Famous Fairways. London: Stanley Paul, Includes:Balata, Billy. Being The Ball. Phoenix, Arizona: B.T.B. 1968.Allison, Willie. The First Golf Review. London: Bonar Books, Entertainment, 2000.Beard, Frank. Shaving Strokes. New York: Grosset 1950.Alliss, Peter. A Golfer’s Travels. London: Boxtree, 1997.Alliss, & Dunlap, 1970.Canfield, Jack. Chicken Soup For The Golfer’s Soul: Peter. Bedside Golf. London: Collins, 1980.Alliss, Peter. More Bedside The 2nd Round. Florida: Health Communications, 2002.Canfield, Jack. Golf. London: Collins, 1984.Alliss, Peter. Yet More Bedside Golf. Chicken Soup For The Soul. Cos Cob, Connecticut: Chicken Soup For London: Collins, 1985.Ballesteros, Severiano. Seve. Connecticut: Golf The Soul Publishing, 2008.Canfield, Jack. Chicken Soup For The Soul Digest, 1982.Cotton, Henry. Thanks For The Game. London: Sidgwick & And Golf Digest Present THE GOLF BOOK. Cos Cob, Connecticut: Jackson, 1980.Crane, Malcolm. The Story Of Ladies’ Golf. London: Chicken Soup For The Soul Publishing, 2009.Canfield, Jack. Chicken Stanley Paul, 1991.Critchley, Bruce. Golf And All Its Glory. London: B B Soup For The Woman Golfer’s Soul. Florida: Health Communications, C Books, 1993.Follmer, Lucille. Your Sports Are Showing. : Pellegrini & 2007.Coyne, John. The Caddie Who Won The Masters. Oakland, Cudahy, 1949.Greene, Susan. Consider It Golf. SIGNED. Michigan: California: Peace Corps Writers Book, 2011.Ferguson, Allan Mcalister. Excel, 2000.Greene, Susan. Count On Golf. SIGNED. Michigan: Excel, Golf In Scotland.
    [Show full text]
  • Golf Glossary by John Gunby
    Golf Glossary by John Gunby GENERAL GOLF TERMS: Golf: A game. Golf Course: A place to play a game of golf. Golfer,player: Look in the mirror. Caddie: A person who assists the player with additional responsibilities such as yardage information, cleaning the clubs, carrying the bag, tending the pin, etc. These young men & women have respect for themselves, the players and the game of golf. They provide a service that dates back to 1500’s and is integral to golf. Esteem: What you think of yourself. If you are a golfer, think very highly of yourself. Humor: A state of mind in which there is no awareness of self. Failure: By your definition Success: By your definition Greens fee: The charge (fee) to play a golf course (the greens)-not “green fees”. Always too much, but always worth it. Greenskeeper: The person or persons responsible for maintaining the golf course Starting time (tee time): A reservation for play. Arrive at least 20 minutes before your tee time. The tee time you get is the time when you’re supposed to be hitting your first shot off the first tee. Golf Course Ambassador (Ranger): A person who rides around the golf course and has the responsibility to make sure everyone has fun and keep the pace of play appropriate. Scorecard: This is the form you fill out to count up your shots. Even if you don’t want to keep score, the cards usually have some good information about each hole (Length, diagrams, etc.). And don’t forget those little pencils.
    [Show full text]
  • The (Adverse) Incentive Effects of Competing with Superstars
    \The (Adverse) Incentive Effects of Competing with Superstars: A Reexamination of the Evidence"1 Robert A. Connolly and Richard J. Rendleman, Jr. February 22, 2013 1Robert A. Connolly is Associate Professor, Kenan-Flagler Business School, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Richard J. Rendleman, Jr. is Professor Emeritus, Kenan-Flagler Business School, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill and Visiting Professor at the Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth. The authors thank the PGA TOUR for providing the ShotLink data and a portion of the Official World Golf Rankings data used in connection with this study and Mark Broadie, Edwin Burmeister and David Dicks for providing very helpful comments. We thank Jennifer Brown for providing us with a condensed ver- sion of her STATA code, providing her weather and Official World Golf Ranking data, and providing lists of events employed in her study. We also thank her for responding to many of our questions in corre- spondence and providing comments on earlier drafts of this paper. Please address comments to Robert Connolly (email: robert [email protected]; phone: (919) 962-0053) or to Richard J. Rendleman, Jr. (e-mail: richard [email protected]; phone: (919) 962-3188). `Quitters Never Win: The (Adverse) Incentive Effects of Competing with Superstars: A Reexamination of the Evidence" Abstract In \Quitters Never Win: The (Adverse) Incentive Effects of Competing with Superstars," Brown (2011) argues that professional golfers perform relatively poorly in tournaments in which Tiger Woods also competes. We show that Brown's conclusions are based on a problematic empirical design, which if corrected yields no evidence of a superstar effect.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Curtis Cup Club Medal Competition
    2020 Curtis Cup Club Medal Competition Dear Club Manager/Secretary, To celebrate the upcoming Curtis Cup matches set to be played at Conwy Golf Club, 12th–14th June 2020; all golfers in Wales will have the chance to compete for free tickets to watch some of the greatest female amateurs in the world. Alongside the R&A, Wales Golf are able to offer 2 free tickets for the matches to every club. The tickets will be played for in a handicap club medal which will be open to all male and female members, with the winning golfer claiming the prize of the complimentary tickets. In order to claim the tickets for your winning golfer, please simply notify us when you are running your medal and we will send the tickets directly to the club for your distribution to the winner. Running a Mixed Gender Medal In order to ensure male and female golfers can compete fairly against one another, some minor handicap alterations may be required depending on SSS ratings of your course. The information required is available below from the CONGU Unified Handicapping System Manual (Page 92 & 93, App. O) When to run the Club Medal There is no set date or time frame in which to run your club medal, and it can be tied in to existing club competitions if required provided the medal can be run effectively. Where viable we would like to request a weekend in order to attract as many players as possible. Entry fees Wales Golf and the R&A will not be charging any entry fees for players or clubs alike.
    [Show full text]
  • Rocco Mediate
    Rocco Mediate Representerar United States (USA) Född Status Proffs Huvudtour SGT-spelare Nej Aktuellt Ranking 2021 Rocco Mediate har inte startat säsongen. Karriären Totala prispengar 1997-2021 Rocco Mediate har följande facit så här långt i karriären: (officiella prispengar på SGT och världstourerna) Summa Största Snitt per 4 segrar på 370 tävlingar. För att vinna dessa 4 tävlingar har det krävts en snittscore om 67,63 kronor prischeck tävling slag, eller totalt -66 mot par. I snitt per vunnen tävling gick Rocco Mediate -16,50 i förhållande År Tävl mot par. Segrarna har varit värda 21 560 400 kr. 1997 24 1 857 252 377 910 77 385 Härutöver har det också blivit: 1998 24 3 076 185 648 000 128 174 - 7 andraplatser. - 2 tredjeplatser. 1999 25 7 641 074 4 158 000 305 643 - 19 övriga topp-10-placeringar 2000 24 11 790 112 4 471 200 491 255 - 38 placeringar inom 11-20 2001 21 14 760 213 4 168 800 702 867 - 157 övriga placeringar på rätt sida kvalgränsen - 12 missade kval 2002 22 19 985 162 7 045 200 908 416 Med 227 klarade kval på 239 starter är kvalprocenten sålunda 95. 2003 24 15 469 628 4 590 000 644 568 Sammantaget har Rocco Mediate en snittscore om 71,10 slag, eller totalt -280 mot par. 2004 19 1 908 627 627 000 100 454 2005 24 5 307 457 1 440 526 221 144 2006 18 1 093 579 287 620 60 754 2007 21 7 955 098 4 128 300 378 814 2008 26 8 571 858 4 924 800 329 687 2009 22 3 711 710 537 328 168 714 2010 25 7 343 908 5 886 000 293 756 2011 23 901 097 380 800 39 178 2012 22 1 633 895 323 914 74 268 2013 1 0 0 0 2014 2 0 0 0 2015 1 0 0 0 2016 2 271
    [Show full text]
  • Lucas Glover
    Lucas Glover Representerar United States (USA) Född Status Proffs Huvudtour PGA Tour SGT-spelare Nej Aktuellt Ranking 2021 Lucas Glover har i år spelat 20 tävlingar. Han har klarat 13 kval. På dessa 20 starter har det blivit 2 topp-10-placeringar. Lucas Glover har vunnit 1 tävling(ar): John Deere Classic. Han har i år en snittscore om 70,56 efter att ha slagit 4657 slag på 66 ronder. Lucas Glover har på de senaste starterna placeringarna MC-57-MC-MC-38 varav senaste starten var BMW Championship. Han har i år som bästa score noterat 63 (-8) i Waste Management Phoenix Open på TPC Scottsdale. 27 av årets 66 ronder har varit under par. Vid 23 tillfällen har det noterats scorer på under 70 slag men också vid 4 tillfällen minst 75 slag. Årets tävlingar Plac Tävling Plac Tävling Plac Tävling 38 BMW Championship MC Palmetto Championship at Congaree 48 THE PLAYERS Championship Caves Valley Golf Club, PGA Tour Congaree Golf Club, PGA Tour TPC Deere Run, PGA Tour MC THE NORTHERN TRUST 37 the Memorial Tournament presented by Nationwide39 Puerto Rico Open Liberty National Golf Club, PGA Tour Torrey Pines (South), PGA Tour Grand Reserve Country Club, PGA Tour MC Wyndham Championship 8 Charles Schwab Challenge MC The Genesis Invitational Sedgefield Country Club, PGA Tour Course: Colonial Country Club, PGA Tour The Riviera Country Club, PGA Tour 57 World Golf Championships-FedEx St. Jude InvitationalMC Wells Fargo Championship 58 Waste Management Phoenix Open Liberty National Golf Club, PGA Tour Quail Hollow Club , PGA Tour TPC Scottsdale, PGA Tour MC
    [Show full text]
  • Settling Ties in Handicap Competitions
    SETTLING TIES IN HANDICAP COMPETITIONS How do you settle deadlocks-a halved match or a stroke-play tie-in a net competition? Rule 33-6 in the Rules of Golf requires that the Committee in charge of the competition announce a procedure for breaking ties before the competition starts. Simply stated, a halved match shall not be decided by stroke play; a tie in stroke play should not be decided by a match. Under Conditions of the Competition in Appendix I of the Rules of Golf, the USGA has some good recommendations that can help in these ticklish situations. Let's start with stroke play. One day our favorite duo, Uncle Snoopy and Woodstock, play 18 holes in a net competition at one of their favorite courses, Pumpkin Patch Golf Club. Uncle Snoopy's diligent work on his game has shaved his USGA Handicap Index down to 9.2, which translated into a Course Handicap of 11 that day. Woodstock meanwhile, has continued to struggle along with his 17.4 USGA Handicap Index, which resulted in a Course Handicap of 20 at Pumpkin Patch GC. At the end of 18 holes, Uncle Snoopy and Woodstock performed some beagle arithmetic on their scorecard. From the drawing, you can see that they both made net scores of 72. How should they proceed to break the tie? Sudden death is not recommended by the USGA in such cases. It's felt that playing hole-by-hole shouldn't decide a tie in stroke play. Instead, a playoff over 18 holes is the favored format.
    [Show full text]
  • Pgasrs2.Chp:Corel VENTURA
    Senior PGA Championship RecordBernhard Langer BERNHARD LANGER Year Place Score To Par 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Money 2008 2 288 +8 71 71 70 76 $216,000.00 ELIGIBILITY CODE: 3, 8, 10, 20 2009 T-17 284 +4 68 70 73 73 $24,000.00 Totals: Strokes Avg To Par 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Money ê Birth Date: Aug. 27, 1957 572 71.50 +12 69.5 70.5 71.5 74.5 $240,000.00 ê Birthplace: Anhausen, Germany êLanger has participated in two championships, playing eight rounds of golf. He has finished in the Top-3 one time, the Top-5 one time, the ê Age: 52 Ht.: 5’ 9" Wt.: 155 Top-10 one time, and the Top-25 two times, making two cuts. Rounds ê Home: Boca Raton, Fla. in 60s: one; Rounds under par: one; Rounds at par: two; Rounds over par: five. ê Turned Professional: 1972 êLowest Championship Score: 68 Highest Championship Score: 76 ê Joined PGA Tour: 1984 ê PGA Tour Playoff Record: 1-2 ê Joined Champions Tour: 2007 2010 Champions Tour RecordBernhard Langer ê Champions Tour Playoff Record: 2-0 Tournament Place To Par Score 1st 2nd 3rd Money ê Mitsubishi Elec. T-9 -12 204 68 68 68 $58,500.00 Joined PGA European Tour: 1976 ACE Group Classic T-4 -8 208 73 66 69 $86,400.00 PGA European Tour Playoff Record:8-6-2 Allianz Champ. Win -17 199 67 65 67 $255,000.00 Playoff: Beat John Cook with a eagle on first extra hole PGA Tour Victories: 3 - 1985 Sea Pines Heritage Classic, Masters, Toshiba Classic T-17 -6 207 70 72 65 $22,057.50 1993 Masters Cap Cana Champ.
    [Show full text]
  • GA Handicap System (Copyright)
    GA Handicap System (Copyright) Version 20/7/2017 This document is available via free download from www.golf.org.au. Any other website is welcome to feature a link to the specific webpage. The document itself must not be made available for download from any website other than www.golf.org.au. CONTENTS 1. First Principles of the GA Handicap System 2. General 3. Types of Official GA Handicap & Types of Handicap Status 4. Definitions 5. The Player 6. The Home Club 7. The Visited Club 8. Daily Scratch Rating (DSR) and Course Rating 9. Stableford Handicapping Adjustment (SHA) 10. Scores for Handicapping Purposes 11. Allocation of GA Handicap 12. Calculation of Handicaps 13. Life of Scores & Lapsed Handicaps 14. Maximum Handicaps, Provisional Handicaps, and Club Handicaps 15. Manual Override by Club of Normal Handicap Calculation Process 16. Manual Bonus Reduction for Exceptional Net Score 17. Allocation of Special Competition Handicap in Extraordinary Circumstances 18. Handicap Information Disclosure 19. Common Handicapping Scenarios – Procedures for Pro Shops & Handicapping Administrators NOTE: All defined terms are in italics and are listed in the Definitions section (Section 4). 3 1. First Principles of the GA Handicap System The GA Handicap System should achieve each of the following: (i) Be primarily tailored for competition golf and afford each player in the field a reasonable prospect of winning or placing well if that player plays reasonably better than their handicap. (ii) A player’s handicap should be reflective of their better performances and should not increase substantially due to a temporary loss of form. (iii) The calculation of a handicap should take into account the degree of difficulty presented at the time by the playing conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Caddie Exam
    THE CADDIE EXAM Western Golf Association www.wgaesf.org CADDIE EXAM Now that you have studied and reviewed the caddie manual and caddie orientation video, use this exam to test your caddie knowledge. This exam is worth 100 points. A minimum score of 85 points (85 percent) and above is considered passing. You have 30 minutes to complete. Thank you. The following statements are true or false. Read each statement carefully and circle the appropriate response. The True/False questions are worth 5 points each. 1. It is correct to pick up your player’s golf ball if you cannot identify the brand and number. True False 2. When the caddie manager assigns you a golfer, you may turn it down if you would like to caddie for someone else. True False 3. It is correct to demand from your player their golf club immediately after everyone has hit their tee shot. True False 4. In a greenside bunker, if your player fails to reach the putting green, stay with him/her and come back later to rake the sand or ask for another caddie’s assistance. True False 5. The caddie whose player is first to reach the putting green will be expected to handle the flagstick duties. True False Listed below are sentences followed by statements. Circle the letter(s) in front of all the correct statements. (There can be more than one correct answer for each question). The following questions are worth 5 points each. 6. Which of the following practices will help you become a good caddie? a.
    [Show full text]
  • Variable Face Milling to Normalize Putter Ball Speed and Maximize Forgiveness †
    Proceedings Variable Face Milling to Normalize Putter Ball Speed and Maximize Forgiveness † Jacob Lambeth *, Dustin Brekke and Jeff Brunski Cleveland Golf, 5601 Skylab Rd. Huntington Beach, CA 92647, USA; [email protected] (D.B.); [email protected] (J.B.) * Correspondence: [email protected] † Presented at the 12th Conference of the International Sports Engineering Association, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 26–29 March 2018. Published: 24 February 2018 Abstract: The forgiveness of golf putters is traditionally achieved through weight distribution. Higher MOI (moment of inertia) putters will show less ball speed loss on impacts away from the sweet spot. A very large MOI putter, however, may not be desired by a golfer due to weight or appearance. The relationship between ball speed and impact location is affected by the mass properties of the putter (i.e., CG location, mass, moments of inertia, products of inertia) and the putter face. It has been shown that certain face properties, such as milling patterns, grooves, or soft inserts, can have small effects on ball speed. This paper proposes a method to normalize the ball speed on laterally miss-hit putter impacts using a “model-specific” milling pattern of variable depth and pitch, resulting in the largest possible region of the face providing consistent putt distances, thus improving performance given the average player’s impact pattern. Keywords: golf clubs; putters; performance; milling; ball speed 1. Introduction Golf putters, like drivers and irons, are designed with strong consideration for forgiveness. Amateur golfers tend to impact the putter face over a relatively large area, increasing the need for performance on poor strikes.
    [Show full text]
  • 30-Minute WHS Presentation Notes
    30-Minute WHS Presentation Notes Slide 1 – None Slide 2 - None Slide 3 You can see by the map that the USGA Handicap System is the primary system being used today around the world – but there are six systems representing 15 million golfers in 80 countries who currently maintain a golf handicap. Each system aims to achieve the same thing – measure a golfer’s ability and provide equity for play – but with differing results that don’t translate very well from one to the other. Handicapping is a fragmented market right now. A collaborative process – USGA, R&A, Council of National Golf Unions (CONGU), European Golf Association, Golf Australia, Argentine Golf, South African Golf. Each of the existing handicap authorities have representation on the World Handicap Operations Committee. Along with the World Handicap Authority, they've helped developed the new World Handicap System. Future landscape (2020) – click for animation: • A unified WHS will enable golfers of different ability to play and compete on a fair and equitable basis, in any format, on any course, anywhere around the world. • So it will be portable around the world and provide a single measure worldwide for determining a player’s ability. • When adopted, the World Handicap System will be governed by the USGA and The R&A and administered by national and multi-national associations around the world. Safeguards are included to ensure consistency as well as adaptability to differing golf cultures. Slide 4 The USGA and The R&A currently govern the game with a global set of playing rules, equipment rules, and rules of amateur status– and in 2020, another piece of the governance puzzle will be added by implementing the World Handicap System which consists of the Rules of Handicapping and the Course Rating System.
    [Show full text]