DOCSLIB.ORG

Allegany Wind Power Project Final Environmental Impact Statement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Allegany Wind Power Project Final Environmental Impact Statement Allegany Wind Power Project Final Environmental Impact Statement 4.1 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION 4.1.1 Project Purpose, Need, and Benefit Written Comment 4L: If, as CCCC strongly urges, the Board concludes that the benefits of this project are in reality limited to financial payments to the Town, and financial payments to a handful of private landowners, but there will be a few other benefits, then the Board look that much more closely at the environmental burdens and the risk of a decline in property values in and around the project area, burdening many more town residents and threatening financial benefits to the Town by eroding the town’s property tax base. If in other words, the benefits clearly fail to outweigh the burdens, the Board should exercise its discretion under SEQRA to deny approval. Response to Written Comment 4L: Comment noted. The benefits described in the DEIS and FEIS are not just financial. As discussed elsewhere in the DEIS and this FEIS, no negative property value impacts are anticipated. No New York Town hosting a wind farm has lost tax base value. Prior to making any decision the Board will balance the social, economic, and environmental impacts and benefits. The following comments are all related to general concerns regarding Project benefits, and the balance between potential impacts and benefits. Written Comment 4G: The remainder of the comments below address whether the DEIS demonstrates that the benefits of the project outweigh the project’s environmental and other burdens. The balance of burdens and benefits is a crucial requirement under the State Environmental Quality Review Act and its implementing regulations (SEQRA), and SEQRA gives the Town Board considerable discretion in determining whether the balance ultimately justifies approval of the project. Written Comment 4J: In an Appendix to this comment letter I have provided the results of independent analyses performed by the wind industry by the agencies that regulate the industry, and by other independent scientists and energy analysts. The Board should rely only on independent, published analyses that actually look under the hood for concrete benefits of wind farms. The sections of the DEIS on project benefits are highly misleading, are in important respects inaccurate, and are supported by little more than assertions from wind industry trade associations rather than independent sources. April 27, 2011 4.1 - 1 Allegany Wind Power Project Final Environmental Impact Statement Written Comment 4M: As has been frequently stated, the Everpower proposal would probably be the most intrusive project Allegany has experienced. It is my hope that the Board looks carefully at this letter and the others being submitted on behalf of CCCC to determine whether the location of industrial wind turbines in the town avoids unacceptable impacts, adequately mitigates those impacts that cannot be avoided, and provides benefits that clearly outweigh expected burdens will require an effort appropriate to the project’s size and potential effects [sic]. Written Comment 6A: For your information, I am opposed to wind turbines installation in our town. This is based not only on the impact of the beauty of our area, but also the lack of substantiated information on the benefits of said wind turbine. Written Comment 7A: Our family resides at 212 Hawthorn Lane in Allegany. We are strongly opposed to the Wind Farm proposal. We have looked at research for positives and negatives. We feel that the negatives far outweigh any positives. Written Comment 10MMMM: The residents of Allegany choose Allegany for its peace and quiet, its beauty, and its quality of life. I ask, how many Allegany residents/taxpayers lives are you willing to sacrifice for New York City Everpower and its British owner, Terra Firma? Written Comment 14A: I would like to let you, the members of the Town of Allegany Planning Board, [know] that the Town of Allegany may not be an appropriate location for the proposed Everpower wind turbine project. The character of the Town of Allegany will be deeply affected by this project and it is probable that the project benefits may not be great enough to offset the negative characteristics. Written Comment 16L: In conclusion, I see little if any benefit to the community and considerable personal and environmental detriment tied to the construction of this project. Additionally, I feel that the above mentioned local, state and federal entities have so far failed to protect and serve the public. Written Comment 24A: Please accept this letter as a formal request to disapprove the Everpower Allegany Wind Turbine project. I have attended the informational meetings and reviewed written and web provided data. After considering the data I feel that there is no legitimate justification for the turbine installations. April 27, 2011 4.1 - 2 Allegany Wind Power Project Final Environmental Impact Statement There does not seem to be any significant advantage to the Township, individual citizens, the environment, or the rural landscape which would be irrevocably altered. Information suggests that at best Western New York is a marginal choice for wind powered energy generation. The price we would pay is profoundly too high for the benefits that would accrue to us. Written Comment 29C: The idea of a wind farm in the town goes against all logic when you learn the facts about them. I am sure that all the board members have been informed by the wind farm company of all the positive reasons for having wind turbines. I hope that you have looked at all the negative reasons as well. I believe that allowing a wind farm in Allegany would be a mistake. The town and its residents would lose much more than they would gain. We are in tough economic times now, but with common sense spending and careful planning, we can get through these times without ruining the beauty of the hills and lands that surround us by allowing the wind farms to exist. Money is not the answer nor should it be the deciding factor in this wind farm proposal. Written Comment 33A: I am writing to urge you to vote no to the proposed wind turbine project in the town of Allegany. There are so many reasons this is not a good thing for our community, or for our region. There are not many, if any, reasons this would be good for us. There may be a few extra dollars seen for a while because of this project, but in the long run, it will cost us much more, both economically and at the expense of the quality of life we have come to take for granted. Unfortunately if it passes and becomes reality, what we take granted will be sorely missed and irreplaceable. At what cost do we sell our beautiful landscape? At what cost do we sell the birds bats and other wildlife that are a vital part of our natural resources? Written Comment 36C: Please assure us you will consider our best interest, rather than [sic] any temporary monetary gain, and say no to this project in this location or any location in Allegany where it might affect residents. I love this community, I want to raise my two young boys here, please do not take our peaceful quiet valley away from us. Written Comment 43B: The people of Chipmonk and Allegany have made it very clear that they are not in favor of these wind turbine farms. The residents of Chipmonk and Allegany depend upon each and every one of you to represent them when planning for a new business opportunities. This venture is clearly April 27, 2011 4.1 - 3 Allegany Wind Power Project Final Environmental Impact Statement not advantageous to anyone in Chipmonk or even in Allegany. The risks far outweigh the benefits. Please put an end to this potential nightmare for the families who reside in the area and deny the greedy corporation who wishes to gain financially from this venture, the ability to use our area for their gain. Written Comment 45A: The net gains and losses need to be assessed, impacts fairly evaluated and community feedback seriously considered. Losses include the following: 1. Industrial blight (static visual pollution) of our greatest resource – the landscape which attracts homeowners (tax payers). 2. Dynamic visual pollution resulting from low rpm turbine blade light interrupting shutter affect. 3. Acoustical pollution (constant background noise). This noise has at least two components – the audible aerodynamic wave produced by a blade passing through the air (the tip velocity of the blade exceed 1000 ft/sec) and the whine of the turbine/generator/rotor/bearing systems (this noise source will increase in dBA levels with time). 4. Power generated will be small (requiring and legitimizing need for more wind turbines) and will be exported from Allegany. 5. Tax benefits from government have a short life expectancy. Temporary additional funding to Allegany Township will not reduce taxes, but may justify spending that will not be maintainable. 6. Capital cost and installation cost – good for big business, but they are not in our community. 7. Equipment Functional Life (determined by other Green Power initiatives) and cost to dismantle (responsibility of landowner or town). 8. Potential for law suits. This is a very real possibility that is a source of good business for local lawyers, but places a time and monetary strain on the Town. Gains – could not come up with any that exhibited long term redeeming value. Written Comment 46F: You are here and were elected to protect all of the people of Allegany not just the rich, and not just the heavily populated areas of Allegany. We pay taxes just like everyone else in town.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Renewable and Alternative Energy at Superfund Sites HARNESSING NEW SOURCES of POWER
    Renewable and Alternative Energy at Superfund Sites www.epa.gov HARNESSING NEW SOURCES OF POWER Introduction This report provides interested parties – local governments, communities, utility and energy companies, and federal and state agencies – with an What’s Inside? overview of renewable and alternative energy opportunities at Superfund sites. Renewable energy facilities can be located on formerly contaminated + Superfund Sites and Renewable Energy lands. Renewable energy can also facilitate the cleanup of Superfund sites. In some cases, site wastes can serve as an alternative energy resource. Finally, the report describes available resources for parties interested in + 2010 Update: pursuing these opportunities. EPA-Tracked Sites To ensure domestic energy security and environmental sustainability, the + Taking a Closer Look: identification of diversified, renewable and alternative energy sources is a long-term national priority. In 2008, EPA launched a new effort – the Siting Wind Energy Renewable Energy on Contaminated Land and Mining Sites Initiative – to Biomass Energy highlight opportunities for the development of clean and renewable energy Solar Energy projects on contaminated lands. Georthermal Energy EPA is also working to help turn these opportunities into reality for + Renewable Energy and Green communities across the country. EPA’s Superfund Redevelopment Initiative Remediation (SRI) helps communities reclaim and reuse contaminated lands for a wide range of purposes, including renewable and alternative energy generation. Through tools, partnerships and activities, SRI continues to provide local + Waste Recycling at Superfund Sites communities with new opportunities to grow and prosper. + Taking a Look Back: To date, several significant opportunities have been realized. In Lackawanna, Superfund Sites and Energy Opportunities New York, the Steel Winds project has transformed a former slag pile into a 20-megawatt wind energy facility.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Energy in NY State
    2010 New York State Wind Energy Study Final Report Source: Milian, Chris; www.photosfromonhigh.com Submitted by: Christina Hoerig Kimballe Campbell Daniel Grew Nicole Gumbs Happiness Munedzimwe Sandeep George Jun Wan Timothy Komsa Karl Smolenski Tyler Coatney Cornell University II Table of Contents Table of Contents .................................................................................................................II List of Figures .................................................................................................................... VI List of Tables ..................................................................................................................... VII 1 Executive Summary ................................................................................................. VIII 2 Introduction ................................................................................................................10 3 New York State Present Energy Supply/Demand ....................................................14 3.1 New York Energy Background ............................................................................14 3.2 Current NYS Wind Power ...................................................................................16 3.3 Near Term Growth of New York State Wind Power .............................................17 3.4 Progress of Other Renewables in New York State ..............................................19 3.5 Power Demand in Tompkins County ...................................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix L-1 WEST Summary of Risks to Birds and Bats
    Appendix L-1 WEST Summary of Risks to Birds and Bats ICEBREAKER WIND: SUMMARY OF RISKS TO BIRDS AND BATS 3 Prepared for Lake Erie Energy Development Corporation (LEEDCo) 1938 Euclid Avenue, Suite 200 Cleveland, Ohio 44115 Prepared by Caleb Gordon and Wallace P. Erickson Western EcoSystems Technology, Inc. 415 W. 17th Street, Suite 200 Cheyenne, Wyoming November 29, 2016 Privileged and Confidential - Not For Distribution Project Icebreaker Bird and Bat Risk Analysis EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Lake Erie Energy Development Corporation (LEEDCo) has proposed the Icebreaker Wind project, a small, demonstration 6-turbine, 20.7-megawatt (MW) offshore wind energy facility eight to 10 miles (13 to 21 kilometers [km]) from the shore of Cleveland, Ohio. WEST has completed a review and summary of baseline data and other publicly available data on bird and bat use and other information of the Project’s environment for the purpose or evaluating the level of risk posed by the proposed project to birds and bats. The overall conclusion of this analysis is that the Project poses low risk of adverse impacts to birds and bats. This conclusion stems largely from two principal observations: 1) the Project is small in scale, consisting of six turbines; 2) the level of use of this area by birds and bats is low compared to bird and bat use of terrestrial or nearshore environments. The potential for displacement effects, defined as the transformation of the Project area from suitable habitat to less suitable habitat by virtue of Project construction or operation, was evaluated by examining data on the use of the Project site and other offshore environments in the central Lake Erie basin by birds and bats for activities other than transit, in the context of technical literature on the subject.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Maine Land Use Regulation Commission In
    STATE OF MAINE LAND USE REGULATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF DEVELOPMENT ) Pre-Filed Direct Testimony of APPLICATION DP 4886 ) Matt Kearns, David Fowler BLUE SKY EAST, LLC ) and Geoff West on behalf of BULL HILL WIND PROJECT ) Blue Sky East, LLC On behalf of applicant Blue Sky East, LLC (“Blue Sky East”), Matt Kearns, David Fowler and Geoff West are submitting this pre-filed direct testimony in support of DP 4886 (the “Bull Hill Wind Project” or “Bull Hill”). I. QUALIFICATIONS AND BACKGROUND A. Matt Kearns I started my career at First Wind Holding, LLC (“First Wind”) in 2006 and I held the title of Director of Development as project developer for the Stetson Wind project before moving to my current role as Vice President of Business Development, Northeast. As Vice President of Business Development, I am responsible for the Northeast development team as they bring projects – including Bull Hill - from concept and due diligence through permitting and into construction and operations. To date, I have overseen the successful development and permitting of wind projects totalling 249 MW in Maine, Vermont and New York. I am a graduate of Colby College and have eighteen years of experience in environmental and energy project permitting and development. My resume is attached as Exhibit A. B. David Fowler I hold the title of Development Manager, New England for First Wind and have served in that position since 2008. As lead developer for the Bull Hill Wind Project, I am responsible for all aspects of project development, including initial site identification, site acquisition and permitting.
    [Show full text]
  • Niagara Wind Power, LLC - Steel Winds I Replacement Project Erie Wind, LLC - Steel Winds II Replacement Project $21,464,287 INDUCEMENT RESOLUTION
    Niagara Wind Power, LLC - Steel Winds I Replacement Project Erie Wind, LLC - Steel Winds II Replacement Project $21,464,287 INDUCEMENT RESOLUTION Eligibility Project Title: Niagara Wind Power, LLC - Steel Winds I Replacement Project Erie Wind, LLC - Steel Winds II Replacement Project • NAICS Section - 221115 Project Address: 2303 Hamburg Turnpike Company Incentives Lackawanna, New York 14218 (Lackawanna City School District) • 15-year Custom PILOT Agency Request Employment Approval of a custom 15 -year payment-in-lieu-of-tax (“PILOT”) Agreement. Steel Winds I Steel Winds II • Retained Jobs - 3 Manufacturing Equipment $13,771,429 $3,442,858 Soft Costs $ 1,000,000 $ 250,000 • Annual payroll: $240,000 Other Costs (Installation) $ 2,400,000 $ 600,000 Project History Total Project Cost $17,171,429 $4,292,858 11/18/2019 - Public hearing held. • Transcript attached. 85% $14,595,714 $3,648,929 • 11/ 20/2019 - Inducement Resolution presented to Board of Directors adopting a Negative Declaration in accordance with SEQRA. Company Description • 11/20/2019 -Lease/Leaseback Inducement Resolution presented Niagara Wind Power, LLC and Erie Wind, LLC (“Niagara and Erie”) are the owners and to the Board of Directors operator of the existing Steel Winds I and Steel Winds II facilities located in the City of Lackawanna. Combined they account for ten 2.5 megawatt turbines at the former Bethlehem Steel site. Energy generated at the facility is sold into the New York Independent System Operator (“NYISO”) market. Project Description Niagara and Erie propose to extend the useful life of the wind turbines by engaging in a re- placement project that would update the equipment and continue to generate real property taxes under a custom payment -in-lieu of tax (“PILOT) arrangement.
    [Show full text]
  • Landowners' Guide to Wind Energy in Alberta
    Landowners’ Guide to Wind Energy in Alberta Tim Weis $ Alex Doukas $ Kristi Anderson (Micro-generation appendix by Gordon Howell) September 2010 ORDER FORM Landowners’ Guide to Landowners’ Wind Energy in Alberta Guide to Wind Energy Format in Alberta :,20= B E * :0<10.> -9?8/ A4>3 ,::08/4.0= :<48> 19<7,> Tim Weis U Alex Doukas U Kristi Anderson Pricing (Appendix by Gordon Howell) -i«ÌiLiÀ 2010 Non-profit organizations and individuals ' '( Corporations :0< .9:C ' '( ,66 19< .9<:9<,>0 /4=.9?8>= 98 -?65 9</0<= %07-48, !8=>4>?>0 # &( Ordering information #,70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ $<2,84D,>498 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ //<0== ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4>C +++++++++++++++++++++++ %<[email protected] +++++++++++ %9=>,6 9/0 ++++++++++++++++++++++ %3980 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ,B ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 7,46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Method of Payment 30;?0 7,/0 :,C,-60 >9 >30 %07-48, !8=>4>?>0 )!' ",=>0<,</ ,</ #?7-0< ++++++++++++++++++++++++ B:4<C ,>0 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ #,70 91 ,</396/0< ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ '428,>?<0 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ",46 :3980 1,B 9< 07,46 >9 >30 ,//<0== -069A (30 %07-48, !8=>4>?>0 9B <,C>98 ),660C
    [Show full text]
  • Spurring Local Economic Development with Clean Energy Investments: Lessons from the Field
    Spurring Local Economic Development with Clean Energy Investments: Lessons from the Field November 2013 This work has been performed by the Center for Climate Strategies (CCS) under the contract 4200000344 with Oak Ridge National Laboratory, which is managed by UT-Battelle, LLC under Contract with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) No. DE-AC05-00OR22725. This document was prepared in collaboration with a partnership of organizations under this contract. The partnership is led by CCS and includes: Loretta Bauer, CCS Peter B. Meyer and Kristen R. Yount, The E.P. Systems Group, Inc. Glenn Barnes and Jennifer Weiss, Environmental Finance Center at The University of North Carolina FOR MORE INFORMATION For additional resources and more information visit the DOE’s State and Local Solution Center at www.eere.energy.gov/wip/solutioncenter. Executive Summary Community-based efforts to improve energy efficiency or generate renewable energy can benefit a local economy in much the same way as other development activities. Referred to in this paper as “clean energy investments,” these initiatives can result in a range of economic benefits, including: New jobs Energy cost savings Increased certainty for energy prices and supply Improved local business competitiveness Higher property values Local market and industrial development Marketing and branding opportunities for the community In turn, these benefits can also lead to many positive secondary effects, such as potential expanded sales and employment gains associated with local businesses lowering their energy costs, as well as multiplier effects of recirculating more local income due to reduced household utility bills. Furthermore, unlike financial incentive programs and speculative infrastructure investments that depend on potential but unclear economic growth impacts, many clean energy investments produce immediate economic returns to localities—and thus can be attractive options for local economic development organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • I Am a 33-Year Re
    March 1, 2016 Villenova Town Board 1094 Butcher Road South Dayton, New York 14138 To the Villenova Town Board: I am a 33-year resident and the 6th generation of my family to live in the Town of Villenova, I am asking you as respected elected officials and as the SEQRA lead agency to take a conscientious review and question the mitigation of environmental and community impacts by the proposed Ball Hill Wind Turbine Project. I believe our community’s greatest asset and most valuable resource is our picturesque landscape. It helps define the self-image of our residents who chose to inhabit it and gives them a sense of place. Though the changing seasons it is the dynamic backdrop to people’s lives. I hope many of our residents, tourists and hunters value the aesthetic, unadulterated nature of our open, scenic, rolling hills with some views as far as Lake Erie. The decision on whether or not to have an industrial wind facility sited in a community resides within the locality, as New York is a home rule state. Building this industrial project would exploit and ruin our landscape, an irreplaceable asset. RES Americas, the BOP company in charge of constructing this project will request amendment of Villenova and Hanover’s wind laws 420 feet limitation on maximum turbine height increased to 498 feet. The year-round visual impact would be significant and cannot be mitigated due to the introduction of 36 500-foot turbines, the height of a 50 story building, the large area of our town involved with the project, the on- going movement of 108 massive rotor blades and the project’s total 7.5-mile view shed.
    [Show full text]
  • C:\Forms\Steel Winds\SEQR Resp 9-2-05.Wpd
    New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Environmental Permits, 4th Floor 625 Broadway, Albany, New York 12233-1750 Phone: (518) 402-9167 • FAX: (518) 402-9168 Website: www.dec.state.ny.us Denise M. Sheehan Acting Commissioner September 2, 2005 City of Lackawanna Planning and Development Board Room 311, City Hall 714 Ridge Road Lackawanna, NY 14218 Attn: Joseph G. Geyer Re: Steel Winds Wind Farm Route 5, Former Bethlehem Steels works Lackawanna, NY Dear Mr. Geyer; The New York Sate Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) staff have performed an initial review of the information and material provided with the City of Lackawanna’s SEQR Notice of Coordinated Review and Declaration of Intent to Act as Lead agency. These materials include the Application for Site Plan Approval and Certain Area variances to Authorize Construction and Operation of a Wind Energy Facility on a Portion of the Former Bethlehem Steel Works Site in Lackawanna, New York (the Application), and the Analysis of Environmental Impacts pursuant to SEQR (The EA). Please be advised the DEC does not object to the City of Lackawanna assuming the role of lead agency, but the DEC does reserve the right to comment on this action if a positive determination is made. As indicated in the following text of this letter, DEC staff have concerns for the potential impacts of certain aspects of this project. Our comments and concerns are listed below under the appropriate topic. Existing Environmental Contamination 1) Although the proposed locations of the ten wind turbines are not located in Solid Waste Management Units (SWMUs), there is a concern that waste materials may be encountered during excavation of the foundation or underground utilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Construction Avian and Bat Mortality Monitoring at the Alta X Wind Energy Project Kern County, California
    Post-Construction Avian and Bat Mortality Monitoring at the Alta X Wind Energy Project Kern County, California Final Report for the Second Year of Operation April 2015 – April 2016 Prepared for Alta Wind X, LLC 14633 Willow Springs Road Mojave, California 93501 Prepared by: Joel Thompson, Carmen Boyd, and John Lombardi Western Ecosystems Technology, Inc. 415 West 17th Street, Suite 200 Cheyenne, Wyoming 82001 July 22, 2016 Alta X Year 2 Final Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Alta Wind X, LLC (Alta Wind X) has constructed a wind energy facility in Kern County, California, referred to as the Alta X Wind Energy Project (“Alta X” or “Project”). Consistent with the Alta East Wind Project Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR), Alta Wind X is committed to conducting avian and bat mortality monitoring at the Project during the first, second, and third years of operation. Following construction in the spring of 2014, Alta Wind X contracted Western Ecosystems Technology, Inc. (WEST) to develop and implement a study protocol for post- construction monitoring at the Project for the purpose of estimating the impacts of the wind energy facility on birds and bats. The following report describes the methods and results of mortality monitoring conducted during the second year of operation of the Project, April 2015 to April 2016. As stated in the DEIR, the goal of the mortality monitoring study is determine the level of incidental injury and mortality to populations of avian or bat species in the vicinity of the Project. To this end, WEST designed and implemented a 3-year study to determine the level of bird and bat mortality attributable to collisions with wind turbines at the facility on an annual basis.
    [Show full text]
  • Creating a Public Plan for New York's Great Lakes Offshore Wind Power
    University at Buffalo School of Law Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law Other Scholarship Faculty Scholarship 5-16-2008 Creating a Public Plan for New York’s Great Lakes Offshore Wind Power: A Strategy for Energy and Economic Development Dwight E. Kanyuck Robert S. Berger University at Buffalo School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/other_scholarship Part of the Energy and Utilities Law Commons, and the Natural Resources Law Commons Recommended Citation Dwight E. Kanyuck & Robert S. Berger, Creating a Public Plan for New York’s Great Lakes Offshore Wind Power: A Strategy for Energy and Economic Development, (2008). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/other_scholarship/40 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Other Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Creating a Public Plan for New York’s Great Lakes Offshore Wind Power A Strategy for Energy and Economic Development Prepared by the University at Buffalo Law School Environment and Development Clinic for the Wind Action Group May 2008 Creating a Public Plan for New York’s Great Lakes Offshore Wind Power A Strategy for Energy and Economic Development Prepared by the Environment and Development Clinic University at Buffalo Law
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix K: Real Estate Consulting Report of Influence of Wind Farms on Residential Real Estate Values, Proposed Ball Hill Wind Energy Project
    Appendix K: Real Estate Consulting Report of Influence of Wind Farms on Residential Real Estate Values, Proposed Ball Hill Wind Energy Project REAL ESTATE CONSULTING REPORT Of Influence of Wind Farms On Residential Real Estate Values Proposed Ball Hill Wind Energy Project Towns of Hanover and Villenova Chautauqua County, New York For Brian Evans, President RES America Developments, Inc. 11101 West 120th Avenue, Suite 400 Broomfield, Colorado Effective Date of Valuation July 22, 2016 Prepared by: Darrel R. Lloyd, Jr. IREM SOLUTIONS 586 North French Road, Suite 1 Amherst, NY 14228 File: 16-396 July 28, 2016 Brian Evans, President RES America Developments, Inc. 11101 West 120th Avenue, Suite 400 Broomfield, Colorado 80021 Re: Real Estate Consulting Report Influence of Wind Farm on Residential Real Estate Value Proposed Ball Hill Wind Energy Project Towns of Hanover and Villenova, Chautauqua County, New York Dear Mr. Evans: The purpose of the assignment is to update a previous report prepared by Darrel R. Lloyd Jr. dated June 3 2008. The scope of that report was to determine if wind farm development impacts residential real estate values in the surrounding market area. The June 3, 2008 report concluded there is no conclusive evidence which would indicate any impact or potential impact on residential real estate values in the market area analyzed due to being in close proximity or in the view shed of an operational wind farm. Four studies were performed on comparable operational wind farms within New York State. Two of the wind farms are located in Madison County, New York and two are located in Wyoming County, New York.
    [Show full text]