DOCSLIB.ORG

Landowners' Guide to Wind Energy in Alberta

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Landowners' Guide to Wind Energy in Alberta Landowners’ Guide to Wind Energy in Alberta Tim Weis $ Alex Doukas $ Kristi Anderson (Micro-generation appendix by Gordon Howell) September 2010 ORDER FORM Landowners’ Guide to Landowners’ Wind Energy in Alberta Guide to Wind Energy Format in Alberta :,20= B E * :0<10.> -9?8/ A4>3 ,::08/4.0= :<48> 19<7,> Tim Weis U Alex Doukas U Kristi Anderson Pricing (Appendix by Gordon Howell) -i«ÌiLiÀ 2010 Non-profit organizations and individuals ' '( Corporations :0< .9:C ' '( ,66 19< .9<:9<,>0 /4=.9?8>= 98 -?65 9</0<= %07-48, !8=>4>?>0 # &( Ordering information #,70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ $<2,84D,>498 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ //<0== ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4>C +++++++++++++++++++++++ %<[email protected] +++++++++++ %9=>,6 9/0 ++++++++++++++++++++++ %3980 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ,B ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 7,46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Method of Payment 30;?0 7,/0 :,C,-60 >9 >30 %07-48, !8=>4>?>0 )!' ",=>0<,</ ,</ #?7-0< ++++++++++++++++++++++++ B:4<C ,>0 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ #,70 91 ,</396/0< ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ '428,>?<0 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ",46 :3980 1,B 9< 07,46 >9 >30 ,//<0== -069A (30 %07-48, !8=>4>?>0 9B <,C>98 ),660C ( ' %3980 ,B 9</0<=:07-48, 9<2 9< , .97:60>0 /0=.<4:>498 91 >30 %07-48, !8=>4>?>0F= :?-64.,>498= @4=4> 9?< A0-=4>0 ,> Landowners’ Guide to Wind Energy in Alberta Tim Weis Alex Doukas Kristi Anderson (Micro-generation appendix by Gordon Howell) September 2010 Weis, Tim, Alex Doukas and Kristi Anderson Landowners’ Guide to Wind Energy in Alberta September 2010 Editors: Roberta Franchuk, Roland Lines Layout: Roland Lines Cover Design: Rob Weidemann, Uber Communications Title Page Photo: David Dodge, The Pembina Institute ©2010 The Pembina Institute and The Pembina Foundation The Pembina Foundation for Environmental Research and Education is a national registered charitable organization that enters into contractual agreements with environmental research and education experts, such as the Pembina Institute, to deliver on its work. The Pembina Institute Box 7558 Drayton Valley, Alberta Canada T7A 1S7 Phone: 780-542-6272 Email: [email protected] Additional copies of this report may be downloaded from the Pembina Institute website: www.pembina.org. About the Pembina Institute The Pembina Institute is a national non-profit think tank that advances sustainable energy solutions through research, education, consulting and advocacy. It promotes environmental, social and economic sustainability in the public interest by developing practical solutions for communities, individuals, governments and businesses. The Pembina Institute provides policy research leadership and education on climate change, energy issues, green economics, energy efficiency and conservation, renewable energy, and environmental governance. For more information about the Pembina Institute, visit www.pembina.org or contact [email protected]. The Pembina Institute’s engaging monthly newsletter offers insights into its projects and activities, and highlights recent news and publications. Subscribe to Pembina eNews at www.pembina.org/enews/subscribe. Acknowledgements This project was sponsored by Growing Forward, a federal-provincial-territorial initiative, and by Alberta Environment’s Climate Change Strategy. It was also made possible by financial support from the Economic Development Alliance of Southeast Alberta. The invaluable contributions of many stakeholders contributed greatly to the guide. We extend our thanks to Graham Gilchrist of the Farmers’ Advocate Office, Kelly Lund of Alberta Agriculture and Rural Development, Tracy Heebner of the Economic Development Alliance of Southeast Alberta, Ron Vermeulen of Land Solutions, Kolja Vainstein of Suncor, Jason Edworthy of TransAlta, Paula McGarrigle of Solas Energy Consulting, Vadim Belotserkovsky of GPCo, Dan Tocher of Greengate Power, Philip Nelson of LandSolutions and David Huggill of the Canadian Wind Energy Association. 2 : LANDOWNERS’ GUIDE TO WIND ENERGY IN ALBERTA THE PEMBINA INSTITUTE ©2010 The Pembina Institute. For personal use only. Not for commercial use or printing. To order print copies, call the Pembina Institute at 780-542-6272 or visit re.pembina.org. About the Authors Tim Weis is a professional engineer and the Director of Renewable Energy and Efficiency Policy at the Pembina Institute. Tim has written extensively on renewable energy and energy efficiency on technical and policy issues at national, provincial and municipal levels, as well as issues specific to First Nations and northern contexts. He has assisted more than 20 communities at various stages of development of renewable energy projects. Tim has also worked as a renewable energy consultant examining wind energy challenges in Northern communities. Tim has a master’s degree in mechanical engineering from the University of Alberta where he studied ice adhesion to wind turbine blades. Tim can be reached at [email protected]. Alex Doukas is a former Technical and Policy Advisor with the Pembina Institute’s Sustainable Communities Group. Before joining the Pembina Institute, Alex worked with the Ontario Sustainable Energy Association (OSEA) on renewable energy education and policy development, and helped facilitate the development of community-based wind and solar energy projects. While with OSEA, he authored sections of the Canadian Renewable Energy Association’s National Renewable Energy Strategy, including “Distributed Generation” and “Community Power.” Alex has also worked with a Toronto-based biogas development company to help reduce greenhouse gas emissions and landfill waste. Alex holds a BA in environmental policy and practice from the University of Toronto. Kristi Anderson is a Technical and Policy Analyst providing research support to Pembina’s policy and consulting groups on topics related to renewable energy, energy efficiency and environmental assessments. Prior to joining the Pembina Institute, Kristi conducted environmental impact assessments for utility-scale wind energy projects in Alberta and worked as a consultant on biogas electricity projects. She has also worked directly for electrical utility companies in both an environmental policy and business development capacity. Kristi has a bachelor’s degree in environmental biology, an MBA with a specialization in natural resources and energy from the University of Alberta, and a certificate in environmental protection from the Royal Military College. Kristi can be reached at [email protected]. Gordon Howell is an electrical engineer with Howell-Mayhew Engineering. He has 28 years of experience with grid-connected solar-electric systems and 20 years on international, national and provincial solar standards committees. His solar- electric house was the first grid-connected one west of Toronto and the 12th in Canada. Since then he has worked on the development of simple uniform steps to grid-connect all micropower systems. He has worked with Alberta’s government, electric regulators and utilities to resolve and remove barriers to solar electricity. His most recent work is in developing cost-effective net zero energy solar homes. Gordon has a bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering from the University of Alberta. He can be reached at [email protected]. THE PEMBINA INSTITUTE LANDOWNERS’ GUIDE TO WIND ENERGY IN ALBERTA ::::3 ©2010 The Pembina Institute. For personal use only. Not for commercial use or printing. To order print copies, call the Pembina Institute at 780-542-6272 or visit re.pembina.org. Contents 1. Getting Started ............................................................................................................................ 8 1.1. Who Is This Guide For? ..................................................................................................................8 1.2. How to Use This Guide...................................................................................................................8 Part I Wind Energy Background....................................................................................................... 10 2. Wind Energy in Alberta.............................................................................................................. 11 2.1. Wind Energy Markets...................................................................................................................11 2.2. Alberta’s Wind Resource..............................................................................................................12 3. Wind Technology Overview ....................................................................................................... 13 3.1. Wind Turbine Basics .....................................................................................................................13 3.1.1. Wind Speeds and Turbine Operation .................................................................................13 3.1.2. Wind Turbine Size ...............................................................................................................13 3.1.3. Tower Types ........................................................................................................................14
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Plugging Ontario Into a Green Future a Renewable Is Doable Action Plan
    Plugging Ontario Into A Green Future A Renewable is Doable Action Plan Cherise Burda, THE PEMBINA INSTITUTE and Roger Peters NOVEMBER 2008 CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW ASSOCIATION L’ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DU DROIT DE L’ENVIRONNEMENT Plugging Ontario Into A Green Future A RENEWABLE IS DOABLE ACTION PLAN Cherise Burda, The Pembina Institute and Roger Peters NOVEMBER 2008 CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW ASSOCIATION L’ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DU DROIT DE L’ENVIRONNEMENT Burda, Cherise and Peters, Roger Plugging Ontario into a Green Future 1st Edition, published November 2008 Printed in Canada Production management: Lori Chamberland Editor: Margaret Chandler Design/Layout: J & W Communications Cover Photo: National Renewable Energy Laboratory ©2008 The Pembina Foundation ISBN 1-897390-17-3 For more information about this report please contact The Pembina Institute Suite 415 - 215 Spadina Avenue Toronto, Ontario Canada, M5T 2C7 Phone: 416-644-1016 Email: [email protected] Download additional copies of this publication from the Pembina Institute website: www.pembina.org and renewableisdoable.com. About Renewable s Renewable Is Doable is a joint inititative of the Pembina Institute Is Doable and World Wildlife Fund. It has now grown to include the David Suzuki Foundation, Greenpeace, Sierra Club and the Canadian Environmental Law Association. For more information about this publication and the Renewable is Doable campaign visit www.renewableisdoable.com. CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW ASSOCIATION L’ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DU DROIT DE L’ENVIRONNEMENT i i P L U G G I N G ONTARIO INTO A GREEN FUTURE s About the Cherise Burda Lead Authors Cherise joined Pembina after over 14 years working on environ- mental policy and legislative solutions in British Columbia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Next Frontier for Climate Action Decarbonizing Urban Freight in Canada
    The next frontier for climate action Decarbonizing urban freight in Canada Maddy Ewing, Carolyn Kim, Janelle Lee, Cedric Smith February 2020 updated July 2020 The next frontier for climate action About the Pembina Institute Decarbonizing urban freight in Canada The Pembina Institute is a national non-partisan think tank that advocates for strong, effective policies to All photos by Roberta Franchuk, Pembina Institute, unless support Canada’s clean energy transition. We employ otherwise indicated. multi-faceted and highly collaborative approaches to ©2020 The Pembina Institute change. Producing credible, evidence-based research and analysis, we consult directly with organizations All rights reserved. Permission is granted to reproduce all or to design and implement clean energy solutions, and part of this publication for non-commercial purposes, as long convene diverse sets of stakeholders to identify and as you cite the source. move toward common solutions. Recommended citation: Maddy Ewing, Carolyn Kim, Janelle Lee, Cedric Smith. The next frontier for climate action: Decarbonizing urban freight in Canada, The Pembina Institute, 2020. Additional copies of this publication may be downloaded from the Pembina Institute website, www.pembina.org. ———————————————————— pembina.org ———————————————————— twitter.com/pembina facebook.com/pembina.institute Contents The next frontier for climate action. 3 Businesses, municipalities act on climate. .5 Vancouver . 7 Calgary. .8 Edmonton . 9 Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area . .10 Ottawa. 11 Montreal. .12 Halifax. .13 Benefits of better urban freight management. 14 Key challenges to improving goods movement in cities. 16 Urban freight solutions. .17 Alternative delivery modes. .17 Alternative delivery models and technologies . 18 Recommendations. .20 2 The next frontier for climate action: Urban freight in Canada The next frontier for climate action Decarbonizing urban freight in Canada The world is at a climate tipping point.
    [Show full text]
  • Optimizing the Visual Impact of Onshore Wind Farms Upon the Landscapes – Comparing Recent Planning Approaches in China and Germany
    Ruhr-Universität Bochum Dissertation Submission to the Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Faculty of Geosciences For the degree of Doctor of natural sciences (Dr. rer. nat) Submitted by: Jinjin Guan. MLA Date of the oral examination: 16.07.2020 Examiners Dr. Thomas Held Prof. Dr. Harald Zepp Prof. Dr. Guotai Yan Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Friederich Prof. Dr. Harro Stolpe Keywords Onshore wind farm planning; landscape; landscape visual impact evaluation; energy transition; landscape visual perception; GIS; Germany; China. I Abstract In this thesis, an interdisciplinary Landscape Visual Impact Evaluation (LVIE) model has been established in order to solve the conflicts between onshore wind energy development and landscape protection. It aims to recognize, analyze, and evaluate the visual impact of onshore wind farms upon landscapes and put forward effective mitigation measures in planning procedures. Based on literature research and expert interviews, wind farm planning regimes, legislation, policies, planning procedures, and permission in Germany and China were compared with each other and evaluated concerning their respective advantages and disadvantages. Relevant theories of landscape evaluation have been researched and integrated into the LVIE model, including the landscape connotation, landscape aesthetics, visual perception, landscape functions, and existing evaluation methods. The evaluation principles, criteria, and quantitative indicators are appropriately organized in this model with a hierarchy structure. The potential factors that may influence the visual impact have been collected and categorized into three dimensions: landscape sensitivity, the visual impact of WTs, and viewer exposure. Detailed sub-indicators are also designed under these three topics for delicate evaluation. Required data are collected from official platforms and databases to ensure the reliability and repeatability of the evaluation process.
    [Show full text]
  • A Simple and Fast Algorithm for Estimating the Capacity Credit of Solar and Storage
    Electricity Markets & Policy Energy Analysis & Environmental Impacts Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory A Simple and Fast Algorithm for Estimating the Capacity Credit of Solar and Storage Andrew D. Mills and Pía Rodriguez July 2020 This is a pre-print version of an article published in Energy. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118587 This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) under the Solar Energy Technology Office under Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231. DISCLAIMER This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Government. While this document is believed to contain correct information, neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor The Regents of the University of California, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by its trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof, or The Regents of the University of California. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof, or The Regents of the University of California. Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory is an equal opportunity employer.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Energy Technology Data Update: 2020 Edition
    Wind Energy Technology Data Update: 2020 Edition Ryan Wiser1, Mark Bolinger1, Ben Hoen, Dev Millstein, Joe Rand, Galen Barbose, Naïm Darghouth, Will Gorman, Seongeun Jeong, Andrew Mills, Ben Paulos Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 1 Corresponding authors August 2020 This work was funded by the U.S. Department of Energy’s Wind Energy Technologies Office, under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231. The views and opinions of the authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof, or The Regents of the University of California. Photo source: National Renewable Energy Laboratory ENERGY T ECHNOLOGIES AREA ENERGY ANALYSISAND ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACTS DIVISION ELECTRICITY M ARKETS & POLICY Disclaimer This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Government. While this document is believed to contain correct information, neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor The Regents of the University of California, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by its trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof, or The Regents of the University of California. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof, or The Regents of the University of California.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning for Wind Energy
    Planning for Wind Energy Suzanne Rynne, AICP , Larry Flowers, Eric Lantz, and Erica Heller, AICP , Editors American Planning Association Planning Advisory Service Report Number 566 Planning for Wind Energy is the result of a collaborative part- search intern at APA; Kirstin Kuenzi is a research intern at nership among the American Planning Association (APA), APA; Joe MacDonald, aicp, was program development se- the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), the nior associate at APA; Ann F. Dillemuth, aicp, is a research American Wind Energy Association (AWEA), and Clarion associate and co-editor of PAS Memo at APA. Associates. Funding was provided by the U.S. Department The authors thank the many other individuals who con- of Energy under award number DE-EE0000717, as part of tributed to or supported this project, particularly the plan- the 20% Wind by 2030: Overcoming the Challenges funding ners, elected officials, and other stakeholders from case- opportunity. study communities who participated in interviews, shared The report was developed under the auspices of the Green documents and images, and reviewed drafts of the case Communities Research Center, one of APA’s National studies. Special thanks also goes to the project partners Centers for Planning. The Center engages in research, policy, who reviewed the entire report and provided thoughtful outreach, and education that advance green communities edits and comments, as well as the scoping symposium through planning. For more information, visit www.plan- participants who worked with APA and project partners to ning.org/nationalcenters/green/index.htm. APA’s National develop the outline for the report: James Andrews, utilities Centers for Planning conduct policy-relevant research and specialist at the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission; education involving community health, natural and man- Jennifer Banks, offshore wind and siting specialist at AWEA; made hazards, and green communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Affecting the Community Acceptance of Onshore
    sustainability Article Factors Affecting the Community Acceptance of Onshore Wind Farms: A Case Study of the Zhongying Wind Farm in Eastern China Jinjin Guan * and Harald Zepp Institute of Geography, Ruhr University Bochum, 44801 Bochum, Germany; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 5 August 2020; Accepted: 21 August 2020; Published: 25 August 2020 Abstract: The conflict between wind energy expansion and local environmental protection has attracted attention from society and initiated a fierce discussion about the community acceptance of wind farms. There are various empirical studies on factors affecting the public acceptance of wind farms, but little concerning the correlation and significance of factors, especially in a close distance to the wind farms. This paper aims to identify, classify, and analyze the factors affecting community acceptance through literature review, questionnaire, variance analysis, and linear regression analysis. A total of 169 questionnaires was conducted in 17 villages around the Zhongying Wind Farm in Zhejiang Province, China. The factors are categorized into four groups: Location-related factors, demographic factors, environmental impact factors, and public participation factors. Through the analysis of variance (ANOVA) and linear regression analysis, the outcome shows the universal rule of community acceptance under the Chinese social background. Finally, recommendations for improving wind farm planning procedures are put forward. Keywords: onshore wind farm; community acceptance; wind energy planning; environmental impact; public participation; analysis of variance (ANOVA); regression analysis 1. Introduction Wind energy is recognized as a major renewable energy source alternative. It helps reducing CO2 emission and mitigating climate change due to its high performance, wide resource distribution, and competitive prices.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Energy in NY State
    2010 New York State Wind Energy Study Final Report Source: Milian, Chris; www.photosfromonhigh.com Submitted by: Christina Hoerig Kimballe Campbell Daniel Grew Nicole Gumbs Happiness Munedzimwe Sandeep George Jun Wan Timothy Komsa Karl Smolenski Tyler Coatney Cornell University II Table of Contents Table of Contents .................................................................................................................II List of Figures .................................................................................................................... VI List of Tables ..................................................................................................................... VII 1 Executive Summary ................................................................................................. VIII 2 Introduction ................................................................................................................10 3 New York State Present Energy Supply/Demand ....................................................14 3.1 New York Energy Background ............................................................................14 3.2 Current NYS Wind Power ...................................................................................16 3.3 Near Term Growth of New York State Wind Power .............................................17 3.4 Progress of Other Renewables in New York State ..............................................19 3.5 Power Demand in Tompkins County ...................................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • Renewable Energy Generator Output – Sample Calculations
    Net Metering Program Highlights Net metering will be available to new customers until the size of the program reaches 1% of the electric provider’s previous year system peak in MW. The 1% will be measured against the total of the generator nameplate capacities for all participating customer’s generators and is split into the following tiers: (1) 0.5% for ≤ 20 kW True Net Metering This tier will include almost all residential customers. • Billing is based on net usage. • Customer receives the full retail rate for all excess kWh. • Utility shall use the customer’s existing meter if it is capable of reverse registration (spinning backwards) or install an upgraded meter at no additional cost to the net metering customer. • Utilities with fewer than 1,000,000 customers shall charge net metering customers at cost for an upgraded meter if the customer’s existing meter is not capable of reverse registration (spinning backwards). • A generator meter shall be provided at cost, if requested by the customer. (The generator meter is for the customer’s benefit. Utilities are not obligated to read a customer’s generator meter.) • No interconnection costs (beyond the combined $100 interconnection/net metering application fees), study fees, testing or inspection charges. • Net metering credits carry forward indefinitely. (2) 0.25% for >20 kW up to 150 kW Modified Net Metering • Customers pay full retail rate for electricity deliveries from the utility and receive the generation portion of the retail rate or a wholesale rate for deliveries to the grid. • No charge for the engineering review. • Customers pay all interconnection costs, distribution study fees and any network upgrade costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Powering America Fy08 Activities Summary
    WIND POWERING AMERICA FY08 ACTIVITIES SUMMARY Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Dear Wind Powering America Colleague, We are pleased to present the Wind Powering America FY08 Activities Summary, which reflects the accomplishments of our state Wind Working Groups, our programs at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, and our partner organizations. The national WPA team remains a leading force for moving wind energy forward in the United States. At the beginning of 2008, there were more than 16,500 megawatts (MW) of wind power installed across the United States, with an additional 7,000 MW projected by year end, bringing the U.S. installed capacity to more than 23,000 MW by the end of 2008. When our partnership was launched in 2000, there were 2,500 MW of installed wind capacity in the United States. At that time, only four states had more than 100 MW of installed wind capacity. Twenty-two states now have more than 100 MW installed, compared to 17 at the end of 2007. We anticipate that four or five additional states will join the 100-MW club in 2009, and by the end of the decade, more than 30 states will have passed the 100-MW milestone. WPA celebrates the 100-MW milestones because the first 100 megawatts are always the most difficult and lead to significant experience, recognition of the wind energy’s benefits, and expansion of the vision of a more economically and environmentally secure and sustainable future. Of course, the 20% Wind Energy by 2030 report (developed by AWEA, the U.S. Department of Energy, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, and other stakeholders) indicates that 44 states may be in the 100-MW club by 2030, and 33 states will have more than 1,000 MW installed (at the end of 2008, there were six states in that category).
    [Show full text]
  • Electric Transmission and Distribution Equipment Use
    Electric Transmission and Distribution Equipment Use Final Rule: Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases (40 CFR 98, Subpart DD) Under the final Mandatory Reporting Rule for Additional Sources of Fluorinated Greenhouse Gases (GHGs), owners and operators of electric power system facilities with a total nameplate capacity that exceeds 17,820 lbs (7,838 kg) of sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) and/or perfluorocarbons (PFCs) must report emissions of SF6 and/or PFCs from the use of electrical transmission and distribution equipment. Owners or operators must collect emissions data, calculate GHG emissions, and follow the specified procedures for quality assurance, missing data, recordkeeping, and reporting. How Is This Source Category Defined? The electrical transmission and distribution equipment use source category consists of all electric transmission and distribution equipment and servicing inventory insulated with or containing SF6 or PFCs used within an electric power system. This equipment includes but is not limited to gas-insulated substations; circuit breakers; switchgear, including closed-pressure and hermatically sealed-pressure switchgear; gas-insulated lines containing SF6 or PFCs; gas containers such as pressurized cylinders; gas carts; electric power transformers; and other containers of SF6 or PFC. For the purposes of this subpart, facility is defined as the electric power system, comprising all electric transmission and distribution equipment insulated with or containing SF6 or PFCs that is linked through electric power transmission
    [Show full text]
  • Contact Visitor Information Recreate Responsibly Castle
    Welcome to the Castle Parks Pass Library. There are track set trails for skiers. Winter Guide Visitor Just snowshoe alongside, not over top, so you Contact Encompassing more than 105,000 hectares, don’t disturb the ski trail. Camp Responsibly Castle Provincial Park and Castle Wildland Provincial Park in southwest Alberta protect Information Or join park staff on a winter snowshoe The Castle Parks offer diverse camping Alberta Parks Pincher Creek Office valuable watersheds and habitat for more than adventure exploring the new Castle Park, its experiences in both the front country and the Phone: (403) 627–1165 200 rare species such as whitebark and limber wildlife and landscape, while enjoying a day backcountry. Visitors should be aware that Toll-Free: 310–0000 pine, Jones’ columbine, dwarf alpine poppy, Visitor information is available at kiosks located outdoors! upgrades to existing facilities in the park are Visitor Services: (403) 627–1152 Castle grizzly bear, wolverine, westslope cutthroat trout, throughout the parks, at albertaparks.ca/castle, ongoing, to improve camping experiences for bull trout and harlequin duck. The parks share by calling 403–627–1165, or by speaking with Alberta Parks is working to provide adaptive visitors in the future. General Provincial Park Information Provincial Park & borders with the Waterton Biosphere Reserve to Alberta Parks staff. equipment in order to promote accessibility to Web: albertaparks.ca Wildland Provincial Park the east, Waterton-Glacier International Peace trails in all seasons for people of all abilities. Campgrounds in Castle Provincial Park Toll Free: 1–866–427–3582 Park to the south, the Crowsnest Pass to the Local communities offer a wide range of For more information search for “Push to Open north and the Flathead River Valley of British services to complement your visit including Nature” at albertaparks.ca.
    [Show full text]