DOCSLIB.ORG

Alexander Atkinson Lawrence Papers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Alexander Atkinson Lawrence Papers Alexander Atkinson Lawrence papers Descriptive Summary Repository: Georgia Historical Society Creator: Lawrence, Alexander Atkinson, 1869-1930. Title: Alexander Atkinson Lawrence papers Dates: 1915-1981 Extent: 26.0 cubic feet (48 boxes, 73 volumes) Identification: MS 2019 Biographical/Historical Note Alexander Atkinson Lawrence (1906-1979) was born in Savannah, Georgia, on December 28, 1906. He was the son of Alexander Atkinson Lawrence and Isabel Ashby Paine. He attended Massie School (Savannah, Ga.) and Woodberry Forest Preparatory (Orange, Virginia). He received his bachelor's degree from the University of Georgia in 1929 and read law in his father's Savannah law office, Lawrence and Abrahams. He married Margaret Adams on April 18, 1933, and they had two children. From 1930-1969, Alexander Lawrence practiced law in Savannah as a partner in the firm of Bouhan, Lawrence, Williams, and Levy and established a wide reputation in the legal profession. He engaged in mainly civil cases and represented some of Savannah's major insurance, utility and railroad companies. In 1968, he was nominated to the bench of the Federal District Court of South Georgia. As judge he faced the issue of the desegregation of the Savannah- Chatham County public school system. One of his highest profile civil-damages case grew out of the February 1971 explosion at the Thiokol Chemical Corporation in Woodbine, Georgia. Lawrence served as president of the Georgia and Savannah bar associations. He was a member of the Georgia Bar Examiners' Board, the American College of Trial lawyers, Georgia Historical Commission, Society of Colonial Wars, Society of the Cincinnati, and he served as president of the Georgia Historical Society from 1945 until 1952. He was an active participant in the historic preservation movement in Savannah. Lawrence possessed a great interest in history and wrote several works. His first, James Moore Wayne, Southern Unionist (1943), was a biography of a Savannahian who served on the U.S. Supreme Court from 1835-1867 but refused to join in secession in 1861. His most popular work, Storm Over Savannah (1951; rev. 1979), recounted the siege of the city in 1779. Lawrence's Present for Mr. Lincoln (1961) received an award from the American Association of State and Local History. Other works include: James Johnston, Georgia's First Printer (1956), and A History of the Georgia Supreme Court (1948). Alexander Atkinson Lawrence died on August 20, 1979. Scope and Content Note This collection consists of the personal and business papers of Alexander Atkinson Lawrence. The collection is arranged into 7 series: personal, educational, and legal papers; correspondence and speeches; A Present for Mr. Lincoln research materials; Storm Over Savannah research materials; James Moore Wayne research materials; Johnny Leber materials; and historical markers and sites. Index Terms Civil law--Georgia. Civil rights--Georgia. Constitutional law. Criminal law--Georgia Estaing, Charles Henri, comte d', 1729-1794. Fort Jackson (Ga.) Fort McAllister (Ga. : Fort) Habeas corpus--Georgia. Historical markers--Georgia--Chatham County. Inmates of institutions--Georgia. Johnston, James. Judges--Georgia. Judicial opinions--Georgia. Law. Lawrence, Alexander Atkinson, 1869-1930. Leber, Johnny. Legal documents. Letters (correspondence) Manuscripts for publication. Research notes. Savannah (Ga.)--History--Civil War, 1861-1865. Savannah (Ga.)--History--Siege, 1779. Scrapbooks. Sherman's March to the Sea. Speeches (documents) United States--History--Civil War, 1861-1865. United States--History--Revolution, 1775-1783--Participation, French. Wayne, James Moore, 1790-1867. Woodberry Forest School. Location of Originals Original materials in the possessions of University of North Carolina; University of Michigan; Indiana State Library; University of Georgia Library; Porter W. Carswell; Library of Congress; Solomon's Lodge (Savannah, Ga.); Indiana Historical Society; Emory University Library; Sullivan Bond; Detroit Public Library; Duke University; Wisconsin Historical Society; Maine Historical Society; Avingnon Municipal Library; and William L. Clement Library. Administrative Information Custodial History Material was acquired from creator. Preferred Citation [item identification], Alexander Atkinson Lawrence papers, MS 2019, Georgia Historical Society, Savannah, Georgia. Acquisition Information Gift of Alexander Atkinson Lawrence, 1979. Restrictions Access Restrictions Collection is open for research. Publication Rights Copyright has not been assigned to the Georgia Historical Society. All requests for permission to publish or quote from manuscripts must be submitted in writing to the Division of Library and Archives. Permission for publication is given on behalf of the Georgia Historical Society as the owner of the physical items and is not intended to include or imply permission of the copyright holder, which must also be obtained by the researcher. Publication Note Alexander Atkinson Lawrence, A Present for Mr. Lincoln (Ardivan Press, 1961); Storm Over Savannah (University of Georgia Press, 1951; reprinted 1968; reprinted Savannah, Ga.: Tara Press, 1979); James Moore Wayne (University of North Carolina Press, 1943; reprinted Greenwood Press, 1970). Sponsorship Encoding funded by a 2012 Documenting Democracy grant from the National Historical Publications and Records Commission. Container List SERIES 1:: Personal, educational, and legal papers, 1930-1979 This series contains 73 volumes of briefs, unreported and reported opinions of Judge Alexander Atkinson Lawrence from his work both as an attorney with Bouhan, Lawrence, Williams, and Levy (1930-1968) and while on the bench of the Federal District Court of South Georgia (Savannah, Ga.), 1968-1979. A few of the volumes contain both professional and personal photographs. Other items from Lawrence's professional career include notebooks and correspondence concerning his nomination and appointment to the bench of the Federal District Court of South Georgia. Also included in the series are items from Lawrence's time at Woodberry Forest School (Orange, Va.) and the University of Georgia. Among these items are a scrapbook from Woodberry Forest School, notebooks from the University of Georgia, and photographs. Box Fldr 1 1 Letters to his grandfather, R. de Lawrence, 1915 2 School paper, "The Cruise of the Ben Bolt, 1915-1925" Scrapbooks Box Fldr 1 3 WWI Navy, 1915-1920 4 WWI Aviation, 1918-1919 5 Correspondence sent while at Woodberry 6 Woodberry Forest School, scholastic reports, 1921-1924 7 Issues of the Taylor Tribune, October 6, 1924-November 17, 1924 8 English vocabulary list, 1925 9 Scrapbook of humorous stories, 1925 Class notes Box Fldr 1 10 Course on Georgia history, University of Georgia (also includes drawings and sports statistics), 1925 and 1926 11 Class in Greek, 1925-1926 12 Sigma Alpha Epsilon, membership certificate, 1926. Photograph of 1929 SAE Phi Beta Kappas 13 Correspondence, 1929 University of Georgia Box Fldr 1 14 Examinations for English, 1927-1928; Greek, 1927; Latin, 1927 Notes and examinations 15 History Box Fldr 2 16 Physics 17 Latin 18 Commerce 19 Math 20- English 21 22 Miscellaneous 23 Textbook, Marbot A. Austerlitz (including drawings and sports statistics) 24 Scholastic reports, 1926-1928 25 Graduation program, 1929 26 Poetry book, The Englishman in Greece by Sir Rennell Rodd, Oxford, 1910 27 Photograph, circa 1925-1929 Lessons from reading law Box Fldr 2 28 March 1, 1930 29 March 15, 1930 30 March 21, 1930 31 March 29, 1930 32 April 5, 1930 33 April 12, 1930 34 April 19, 1930 35 April 26, 1930 36 May 3, 1930 37 May 10, 1930 Box Fldr 3 38 May 17, 1930 39 May 26, 1930 40 June 9, 1930 41- Notebooks of quotes, writings, etc. 44 45 Wedding invitation, Alexander Atkinson Lawrence and Margaret Adams, April 18, 1933 46 Legal calendar with notes, 1938 Lawyer's desk book Box Fldr 3 47 1938 Box Fldr 4 48 1939 49 Historical notebook 50 Index of cases on automobiles and evidence in Georgia 51 Oath of office for U.S. Judge; includes other items regarding appointment, 1968 52 Resolutions regarding judgeship 53 Newspapers clippings concerning appointment Letters and correspondence concerning his appointment to U.S. Judge Box Fldr 4 54- 1967-March 1968 59 Box Fldr 5 60- April-July 1968 67 Box Fldr 6 68- July-September 1968 75 76 Correspondence, 1972-1978 77 Letters concerning recommendation to U.S. Supreme Court, 1971 78 Personnel actions and correspondence concerning Senior Judge status and retirement, 1976-1978 79 Richard B. Russell Foundation 80 Photographs, 2 items 81 Judges' dictionary 82 Autobiographical materials on Judge Lawrence Scrapbook, Woodberry Forest School, 1922-1924 Oversize_box 1 Woodberry Forest School certificate of distinction, 1921-1922; Woodberry Forest School diploma, June 5, 1925; certificate of admission for U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, 5th district, November 19, 1943; watercolor from materials on Siege of Savannah Briefs Volume 1 Letter to his father, 1918; photographs of Alexander A. Lawrence as a child, 1930-1931. Volume 2-7 1931-1937 Volume 8 Photograph of Lawrence and his son, 1937-1938. Volume 9-10 1938-1940 Volume 11 Photograph taken November 18, 1940, 1940-1941. Volume 12 1941-1942 Volume 13 Photograph of A.A. Lawrence, 1942-1943. Volume 14-15 1943-1945 Volume 16 War related certificates. Photo of Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1945-1946. Volume 17 Photograph of University of Georgia Club, 1947, 1946-1947. Volume 18-19 1947-1949 Volume 20 Includes speeches and photographs, 1949-1950. Volume
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Political Effects of the Addition of Judgeships to the United States Supreme Court Following Electoral Realignments
    A Compliant Court: The Political Effects of the Addition of Judgeships to the United States Supreme Court Following Electoral Realignments Lauren Paige Joyce Judson Thesis submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of: Master of Arts In Political Science Jason P. Kelly, Chair Wayne D. Moore Karen M. Hult August 7, 2014 Blacksburg, Virginia Keywords: Judicial Politics, Electoral Realignment, Alteration to the Supreme Court Copyright 2014, Lauren J. Judson A Compliant Court: The Political Effects of the Addition of Judgeships to the United States Supreme Court Following Electoral Realignments Lauren J. Judson ABSTRACT During periods of turmoil when ideological preferences between the federal branches of government fail to align, the relationship between the three quickly turns tumultuous. Electoral realignments especially have the potential to increase tension between the branches. When a new party replaces the “old order” in both the legislature and the executive branches, the possibility for conflict emerges with the Court. Justices who make decisions based on old regime preferences of the party that had appointed them to the bench will likely clash with the new ideological preferences of the incoming party. In these circumstances, the president or Congress may seek to weaken the influence of the Court through court-curbing methods. One example Congress may utilize is changing the actual size of the Supreme The size of the Supreme Court has increased four times in United States history, and three out of the four alterations happened after an electoral realignment. Through analysis of Supreme Court cases, this thesis seeks to determine if, after an electoral realignment, holdings of the Court on issues of policy were more congruent with the new party in power after the change in composition as well to examine any change in individual vote tallies of the justices driven by the voting behavior of the newly appointed justice(s).
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court Justices
    The Supreme Court Justices Supreme Court Justices *asterick denotes chief justice John Jay* (1789-95) Robert C. Grier (1846-70) John Rutledge* (1790-91; 1795) Benjamin R. Curtis (1851-57) William Cushing (1790-1810) John A. Campbell (1853-61) James Wilson (1789-98) Nathan Clifford (1858-81) John Blair, Jr. (1790-96) Noah Haynes Swayne (1862-81) James Iredell (1790-99) Samuel F. Miller (1862-90) Thomas Johnson (1792-93) David Davis (1862-77) William Paterson (1793-1806) Stephen J. Field (1863-97) Samuel Chase (1796-1811) Salmon P. Chase* (1864-73) Olliver Ellsworth* (1796-1800) William Strong (1870-80) ___________________ ___________________ Bushrod Washington (1799-1829) Joseph P. Bradley (1870-92) Alfred Moore (1800-1804) Ward Hunt (1873-82) John Marshall* (1801-35) Morrison R. Waite* (1874-88) William Johnson (1804-34) John M. Harlan (1877-1911) Henry B. Livingston (1807-23) William B. Woods (1881-87) Thomas Todd (1807-26) Stanley Matthews (1881-89) Gabriel Duvall (1811-35) Horace Gray (1882-1902) Joseph Story (1812-45) Samuel Blatchford (1882-93) Smith Thompson (1823-43) Lucius Q.C. Lamar (1883-93) Robert Trimble (1826-28) Melville W. Fuller* (1888-1910) ___________________ ___________________ John McLean (1830-61) David J. Brewer (1890-1910) Henry Baldwin (1830-44) Henry B. Brown (1891-1906) James Moore Wayne (1835-67) George Shiras, Jr. (1892-1903) Roger B. Taney* (1836-64) Howell E. Jackson (1893-95) Philip P. Barbour (1836-41) Edward D. White* (1894-1921) John Catron (1837-65) Rufus W. Peckham (1896-1909) John McKinley (1838-52) Joseph McKenna (1898-1925) Peter Vivian Daniel (1842-60) Oliver W.
    [Show full text]
  • A Quantitative Analysis of Writing Style on the U.S. Supreme Court
    Washington University Law Review Volume 93 Issue 6 2016 A Quantitative Analysis of Writing Style on the U.S. Supreme Court Keith Carlson Dartmouth College Michael A. Livermore University of Virginia School of Law Daniel Rockmore Dartmouth College Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Keith Carlson, Michael A. Livermore, and Daniel Rockmore, A Quantitative Analysis of Writing Style on the U.S. Supreme Court, 93 WASH. U. L. REV. 1461 (2016). Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview/vol93/iss6/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington University Law Review by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF WRITING STYLE ON THE U.S. SUPREME COURT KEITH CARLSON MICHAEL A. LIVERMORE DANIEL ROCKMORE ABSTRACT This Article presents the results of a quantitative analysis of writing style for the entire corpus of US Supreme Court decisions. The basis for this analysis is the measure of frequency of function words, which has been found to be a useful “stylistic fingerprint” and which we use as a general proxy for the stylistic features of a text or group of texts. Based on this stylistic fingerprint measure, we examine temporal trends on the Court, verifying that there is a “style of the time” and that contemporaneous Justices are more stylistically similar to their peers than to temporally remote Justices.
    [Show full text]
  • The Constitution in the Supreme Court: Civil War and Reconstruction, 1865-1873 David P
    The Constitution in the Supreme Court: Civil War and Reconstruction, 1865-1873 David P. Curriet The appointment of Salmon P. Chase as Chief Justice in De- cember 1864, like that of his predecessor in 1836, marked the be- ginning of a new epoch in the Court's history. Not only had the Civil War altered the legal landscape dramatically; Chase was to preside over an essentially new complement of Justices. Of those who had sat more than a few years with Chief Justice Roger Ta- ney, only Samuel Nelson and Robert Grier were to remain for a significant time. With them were six newcomers appointed be- tween 1858 and 1864, five of them by Abraham Lincoln and four of them Republicans: Nathan Clifford, Noah H. Swayne, Samuel F. Miller, David Davis, Stephen J. Field, and Chase himself. These eight Justices were to sit together through most of the period until Chase's death in 1873. Taney's longtime colleagues James M. Wayne and John Catron were gone by 1867; William Strong, Jo- seph P. Bradley, and Ward Hunt, appointed at the end of Chase's tenure, played relatively minor roles. The work of the Chase period was largely done by eight men.1 Chase was Chief Justice for less than nine years, but his ten- ure was a time of important constitutional decisions. Most of the significant cases fall into three categories. The best known cases, which serve as the subject of this article, involve a variety of ques- tions arising out of the Civil War itself. Less dramatic but of com- parable impact on future litigation and of comparable jurispruden- tial interest were a number of decisions determining the inhibitory effect of the commerce clause on state legislation.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Jackson (1808 – 1861)
    General History of Fort Jackson To understand the history of Fort Jackson, we must realize that the land surrounding the fort today is far different from what it was when European first saw the Savannah River. The river flowed through many marshy fields resembling a flat plain. The appearance of the area caused the founder of Georgia, General James Edward Oglethorpe, to name the river and town “Savannah,” meaning a treeless plain or relatively flat, open region. When early Indians built large ceremonial mounds near the river, they could not find dry land to build on closer than a mile from the river. One set of these mounds was located about 1600 yards southwest of the future site of Fort Jackson. No doubt General Oglethorpe noticed these mounds as he searched for high ground for his settlement in 1733. As the river flowed around present-day Hutchinson’s Island, the two channels rejoined north of a small clay island which rose just a few feet above the water at high tide. The convergence of these channels created a deepening to about 30 feet, more than ten feet deeper than normal. This part of the river became known as Five Fathom Hole. A few years later, an illiterate brick mason named Thomas Salter chose a site for a brickyard three miles east of the city on the south bank of the Savannah River where he hoped to earn a good living making bricks for housing foundations. The spot he chose was actually the small clay island. The brick-making trade was one of intense hand labor and has not changed in hundreds of years.
    [Show full text]
  • James (Jim) B. Simms
    February 2013 1 I Salute The Confederate Flag; With Affection, Reverence, And Undying Devotion To The Cause For Which It Stands. From The Adjutant The General Robert E. Rodes Camp 262, Sons of Confederate Veterans, will meet on Thursday night, January 10, 2013. The meeting starts at 7 PM in the Tuscaloosa Public Library Rotary Room, 2nd Floor. The Library is located at 1801 Jack Warner Parkway. The program for February will be DVD’s on General Rodes and one of his battles. The Index of Articles and the listing of Camp Officers are now on Page Two. Look for “Sons of Confederate Veterans Camp #262 Tuscaloosa, AL” on our Facebook page, and “Like” us. James (Jim) B. Simms The Sons of Confederate Veterans is the direct heir of the United Confederate Veterans, and is the oldest hereditary organization for male descendants of Confederate soldiers. Organized at Richmond, Virginia in 1896; the SCV continues to serve as a historical, patriotic, and non-political organization dedicated to ensuring that a true history of the 1861-1865 period is preserved. Membership is open to all male descendants of any veteran who served honorably in the Confederate military. Upcoming 2013 Events 14 February - Camp Meeting 13 June - Camp Meeting 14 March - Camp Meeting 11 July - Camp Meeting 11 April - Camp Meeting August—No Meeting 22-26 - TBD - Confederate Memorial Day Ceremony Annual Summer Stand Down/Bivouac 9 May - Camp Meeting 12 September - Camp Meeting 2 Officers of the Rodes Camp Commander David Allen [email protected] 1st Lieutenant John Harris Commander
    [Show full text]
  • The Constitution in the Supreme Court: Contracts and Commerce, 1836-1864
    Pue aiu vurnal VOLUME 1983 JUNE NUMBER 3 THE CONSTITUTION IN THE SUPREME COURT: CONTRACTS AND COMMERCE, 1836-1864 DAVID P. CURRIE* Continuing a study of thefirst hundredyears of constitutionalliti- gation, Professor Currie explores the decisions of the Taneyperiod re- specting the Contract and Commerce Clauses. Though early decisions ofthe Taney Courtseemed to portenda departurefromthe nationalism of its predecessor, the author argues that the impression was largely misleading. In general,for example, the Court under Taney proved rathersympathetic to contractrights. In Commerce Clause cases, after being badly split, the Court was able to agree on a longlastingformula that acknowledged an implicit limitation on statepower, and although in the Taney periodthe Court never clearly struck down a state law on Commerce Clausegrounds, itfoundother ways to protect the interest in unobstructedcommerce. The fourth installment of a critical examination of early Supreme Court constitutional decisions,' this article begins to deal with the nearly thirty-year period during which Roger B. Taney was Chief Jus- tice. Taney's appointment in 1836 marked a watershed in the member- * Harry N. Wyatt Professor of Law, University of Chicago. My thanks to the Duke University School of Law, where this paper was delivered as the Brainerd Currie Memorial Lecture; to my colleagues Frank Easterbrook, Dennis Hutchinson, and Rayman Solomon for their helpful criticism; and to Mark Holmes and Roy Underhill for valuable research assistance. 1. See Currie, The Constitution in the Supreme Court, 1789-1801, 48 U. CHI. L. REv. 819 (1981) [hereinafter cited as Currie, Supreme Court, 1789-1801]; Currie, The Constitution in the Supreme Court: The Powers of the Federal Courts, 1801-1835, 49 U.
    [Show full text]
  • S U Prem E Co U Rt Hi St O Ry
    2003 VOL 28 NO . 2 JOU RNAL OF S U PR E M E CO U RT HI ST O RY 1059-4329 in March, and November by the Court Historical offices 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148, USA, and 9600 uarslngton 1-800-835-6770 Or 388-8200 or +441865 or +44 1865 381393 (-mail: sut)Scr.ro(aJl:>lackweJ Infurmation for Subscribers copy reguests, claims, ofaddress, and all other )cn"rrmcnr at the nearest Blackwell office addr",,," .:>uoscnpuon Rates for Volume 28, 2003 Institutional Premium Rate print to the current and all available The Americas $104, Rest of World £80; Print and onlIne-only are also available Issue Rates: Insntutions: The Amencas $38, Rest of World £29, Customers in Canada should add 7% GST to the Americas rate or UK and EU should add VAT 5% to the Rest of entitlement to access information and terms and conditions, visit institutions also avaIlable on our website, or on request from our customer service or + 1 781 388-8206 (US office') +44 (0)1865 251866 Keep up wlth new ~ Blackwell we'll send you E-mail Alerts V.#' books yout' field. ::>lgmng IIp IS easy. • choose whlch interests you, and we'll send you a message every other week • OR sdect which books and iournals you'd like to hear aDour, and when your mess;:}gcs Electronic Access Abstract information For information on full-text access, see ----~----~- -~----------~----~~-- Back Issues Back are available from the ng}C-l$SUe rate. mailed Standard Rate, to of world by Deutsche Post Global Mail, Canadian mail bl!cations mail agreement number 40573520.
    [Show full text]
  • Judicial Ghostwriting: Authorship on the Supreme Court Jeffrey S
    Cornell Law Review Volume 96 Article 11 Issue 6 September 2011 Judicial Ghostwriting: Authorship on the Supreme Court Jeffrey S. Rosenthal Albert H. Yoon Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Jeffrey S. Rosenthal and Albert H. Yoon, Judicial Ghostwriting: Authorship on the Supreme Court, 96 Cornell L. Rev. 1307 (2011) Available at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr/vol96/iss6/11 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cornell Law Review by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. JUDICIAL GHOSTWRITING: AUTHORSHIP ON THE SUPREME COURT Jeffrey S. Rosenthal & Albert H. Yoont Supreme Court justices, unlike the President or members of Congress, perfom their work with relatively little staffing. Each justice processes the docket, hears cases, and writes opinions with the assistanceof only their law clerks. The relationship between justices and their clerks is of intense interest to legal scholars and the public, but it remains largely unknown. This Arti- cle analyzes the text of the Justices' opinions to better understand judicial authorship. Based on the use of common function words, we find thatJus- tices vary in writing style, from which it is possible to accurately distinguish one from another. Their writing styles also inform how clerks influence the opinion-writingprocess. CurrentJustices, with few exceptions, exhibit signif- icantly higher variability in their writing than their predecessors, both within and across years.
    [Show full text]
  • MEMBERSHIP MEETINGS THURSDAY, March 10, 2016
    BRCWRT — Vol. XXIII, Issue 2, MARCH 2016 Page 1 The Newsletter of the Bull Run Civil War Round Table — Vol. XXIII, Issue 2, MARCH 2016 NPS RANGER AND AUTHOR DANIEL VERMILYA SPEAKS ON “THE BATTLE OF MEMBERSHIP MEETINGS KENNESAW MOUNTAIN, GA” AT THE THURSDAY, March 10, 2016 MARCH 10TH MEETING 7 p.m. Centreville Library By Mark Trbovich GUEST SPEAKER: We will go down to Georgia this month for the “The Battle of Kennesaw Mountain”, which HISTORIAN/AUTHOR was fought on June 27, 1864, during the Atlanta NPS RANGER AND AUTHOR Campaign of the American Civil War. It was the DANIEL VERMILYA most significant frontal assault launched by Un- TOPIC: ion Maj. Gen. William T. Sherman against the Confederate Army of Tennessee, under Gen. “THE BATTLE OF Joseph E. Johnston. This ended in a tactical de- KENNESAW MOUNTAIN, GA” feat for the Union forces. Strategically, however, the battle failed to deliver the result that the Con- federacy desperately needed—namely a halt to search on the Union Army at Antietam. Sherman's advance on Atlanta. Our speaker is He received his Bachelor of Arts degree in well versed in this pivotal western theater battle. history and politics from Hillsdale College in 2009 and graduated cum laude, with departmental honors in history. His Master of Arts degree (2011) is from John Carroll University. His studies were mainly focused on the Civil War. Dan’s master's thesis analyzed motivations and experi- ences of Ohio soldiers in Sher- man's army during the Atlanta Campaign of 1864. Dan writes and maintains a blog, “Our Country’s Fiery Ordeal,” dedicated to his third great- grandfather, Private Ellwood Rodebaugh, Company D, 106th PA Volunteer Infantry, who was killed at the Battle of Antietam, Septem- The Battle of Kennesaw Mountain, June 27, 1864 .
    [Show full text]
  • Overruling Mcculloch? Mark A
    Arkansas Law Review Volume 72 | Number 1 Article 4 July 2019 Overruling McCulloch? Mark A. Graber University of Marlyand, Baltimore Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uark.edu/alr Part of the American Politics Commons, Banking and Finance Law Commons, Civil Procedure Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Judges Commons, Legal History Commons, Legal Theory Commons, Political History Commons, Supreme Court of the United States Commons, Taxation-Federal Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Mark A. Graber, Overruling McCulloch?, 72 Ark. L. Rev. 79 (2019). Available at: https://scholarworks.uark.edu/alr/vol72/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Arkansas Law Review by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Overruling McCulloch? Mark A. Graber Daniel Webster warned Whig associates in 1841 that the Supreme Court would likely declare unconstitutional the national bank bill that Henry Clay was pushing through the Congress.1 This claim was probably based on inside information. Webster was a close association of Justice Joseph Story.2 The justices at this time frequently leaked word to their political allies of judicial sentiments on the issues of the day.3 Even if Webster lacked first- hand knowledge of how the Taney Court would probably rule in a case raising the constitutionality of the national bank, the personnel on that tribunal provided strong grounds for Whig pessimism. Most Jacksonians vigorously opposed the national bank on both policy and constitutional grounds.4 The most vigorous opponents of that institution had been appointed to the Taney Court.
    [Show full text]
  • James Moore Wayne Papers
    James Moore Wayne papers Descriptive Summary Repository: Georgia Historical Society Creator: Wayne, James Moore, 1790-1867. Title: James Moore Wayne papers Dates: 1848-1863 Extent: 0.05 cubic feet (1 folder) Identification: MS 0845 Biographical/Historical Note James Moore Wayne (ca.1790-1867), Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, was born in Savannah. After graduating from Princeton in 1808, he studied law in Savannah and was admitted to the bar in 1810. During the War of 1812 he was an officer in the Georgia Hussars, a local cavalry organization. After the war, Wayne served in the Georgia House of Representatives, 1815-1816. He served in the Georgia General Assembly, 1821-1823 and as Mayor of Savannah, 1823-1825. From 1829 to 1835, Wayne served in the House of Representatives was appointed Associate Justice of the Supreme Court on January 9, 1835, a position he held until his death. Wayne's accomplishments as an Associate Justice include work on the Waring vs. Clarke case and a focus on acquired lands from foreign countries. On July 5, 1867, Wayne died from typhoid fever in Washington. He is buried in Laurel Grove Cemetery in Savannah. Scope and Content Note This collection contains 13 items of correspondence and miscellaneous papers, dating 1848-1863. Subjects covered include the Mexican War and subsequent treaty, the Dred Scott court case, the presidential election of 1861, and various legal matters. The collection is arranged chronologically. Index Terms Georgia Historical Society. Justices (people in law) Letters (correspondence) Mexican War, 1846-1848. Mexico--Foreign relations--1821-1861. Orders (military records) Rush, Benjamin, 1811-1877.
    [Show full text]