DOCSLIB.ORG

S U Prem E Co U Rt Hi St O Ry

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

2003 VOL 28 NO . 2 JOU RNAL OF S U PR E M E CO U RT HI ST O RY 1059-4329 in March, and November by the Court Historical offices 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148, USA, and 9600 uarslngton 1-800-835-6770 Or 388-8200 or +441865 or +44 1865 381393 (-mail: sut)Scr.ro(aJl:>lackweJ Infurmation for Subscribers copy reguests, claims, ofaddress, and all other )cn"rrmcnr at the nearest Blackwell office addr",,," .:>uoscnpuon Rates for Volume 28, 2003 Institutional Premium Rate print to the current and all available The Americas $104, Rest of World £80; Print and onlIne-only are also available Issue Rates: Insntutions: The Amencas $38, Rest of World £29, Customers in Canada should add 7% GST to the Americas rate or UK and EU should add VAT 5% to the Rest of entitlement to access information and terms and conditions, visit institutions also avaIlable on our website, or on request from our customer service or + 1 781 388-8206 (US office') +44 (0)1865 251866 Keep up wlth new ~ Blackwell we'll send you E-mail Alerts V.#' books yout' field. ::>lgmng IIp IS easy. • choose whlch interests you, and we'll send you a message every other week • OR sdect which books and iournals you'd like to hear aDour, and when your mess;:}gcs Electronic Access Abstract information For information on full-text access, see ----~----~- -~----------~----~~-- Back Issues Back are available from the ng}C-l$SUe rate. mailed Standard Rate, to of world by Deutsche Post Global Mail, Canadian mail bl!cations mail agreement number 40573520. Postmaster: Send all address Court Blackwell Inc, 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148-50 I 8. All for the purposes of tesearch private or critiosm or reVIew, no part of this pUDllCanO[ reproduced, stored, transmitted in any form or by any means without "mvnaht holder, Authorization items for internal and by the holder for lIbraries and other users Convri"hr CIe,rance Center 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA in another work, Road, Oxford OX4 2DQ, UK, UK Email: ~~2:~~~~~~'~~I~=~~ visit the website at or contacr Matt Necker" Blackwell Sport Lane, PO Box 80, Willlston, VT 05495. Phone: 1-800-866-I 684 Fax: 802-864-7749. The contents of this arc indexed or abstracted in the America: Collection; Historical Abstracts; InfoTrac Custom; Info Trac OneFile; Online Center ArticleFirst; Online Periodicals & Books. SUPREME OUR ISTORICAL So lET Y HONORARY (HAIRMAN William H. CHAIRMAN EMERITUS D. CHAIRMAN Leon Silverman PRESIDENT Frank C. VICE PRESIDENTS Vlncenc C. Burke, Jr. Dororhy Tapper Goldman E. Barrett Prettyman, Jr. SECRETARY \Varren TR£ASURER Sheldon S. Cohen TRUSTEES R. Adams L. Goldman D. Gordan, III VIGor Roben A. GWInn Herman Belz C. Haz,ud, Jr. Barbara A. Black RIchards Hope B. Renfrew Hugo L. Black, Jr. Rurh InseJ vVillLlm Bradford Frank Boardman Robb M. Rider Vera Brown l Kilpatrick Carol A. Risher Wade Burger Peter A. Knowles Rishikof Pameia Dwinnel!. Buder AI len Laeovara R. Clvillmi Gene W. Lafitte Andrew M. Coars 1. Lancaster, fl'. William Jf. B. Libin Stone J. Maureen E. Seth Waxman F Elwood Howard T WillIams Didden III Mrs. Marshall Charlton Dirt? Marshall, Jr. \V Foster \Vo[[en JohnT Dolan R. McAllister C. Duff Vincenr L. McKusick Robert E. Jucca!11 William Edlund Francis J McNamara, Jr. Ceneral CDunsel James D. lllis Gregory MIchael Miguel A. Estrada Joseph R. ModerolY DaVId T. Pride Thomas W James W. Morris, III Executive Director Fisher John M. Nannes Karhleen Shurdeff Charles a. Galvin \V Nealon Assistant Director Frank B. B. O'Hara JOURNAL OF SUPREME COURT HISTORY 2003 vol. 2.8 no. 2. PUBLICATIONS COMMITTEE E. Barrett Prettyman, JL Chainnan Donald B. Ayer Louis R. Cohen Charles Cooper James J. Kilpatrick Lucas Morel David O'Brien Michael Russ MelvIn 1. Urofsky BOARD OF EDITORS J\·1elvin 1. Uro(sky, Chainllall Herman Bclz DavId J. Bodenhamer Kermit Hall CraIg Joyce Laura Kalman Maeva Marclls David O'Brien Michael ParrIsh EDITORIAL STAff Clare Cushman, Mal1aging Ed,lelr Patricia R. Evans, Rescarcher BI,lCk,.,,\"1I Put,ji,,11,n>;, Boston, ();.. j~'nL UK GENERAL STATEMENT THE SUPREME COURT HISTORICAL SOCIETY IS a pnvare non-profit orgamzation, in the District of Columbia In '974. The IS dedicated to the collcctlon and the Court of the United Scatts. its mISSion by suppotCIng historical r(search, and books and other materials that of the Court's contribution to our nation's nch constitutional has been pubilshmg a news.lettcr, short hiscorical pIeces on the Court and articles the an annual collection has also copublishcd several books WIth Illustrated Biographies, 1789-l995 is a of all 108 the Decisions and Women's Rights: Milestones to for usc by high school students and In addicion to its active acquisitions program, which has contributed pcrmanenr collection of busts and well artifacts and memorabilia relating to the Court's 111 to by the Court Curator's Office for the benefit of the Comt's one million annual Visitors. The Society also funds outside research, awards cash on the Court, and sponsors or cosponsors various lecture scncs and other educational ro further public of the Court and its The Society has in the at 224 East website at The hccn JOURNAL OF SUPR M o HIS ORY 20 ,vol. 28, no. 2 INTRODUCTION Melvin L v ARTICLES "A More Perfect Union": Ableman v Booth and the Culmination of Federal 101 Presidents as Supreme Court Advocates: Before and After White House Allen 116 Wilson, the Court NomInation Melvin L 145 William Howard Taft and the Sandra O'CO/1lWj' The Buddl1a and the Bumblebee: The Reed and Felix Frankfurter FaSSeI/ 16 5 The That Dcflncs the Rule: Marshall's and of Court Doctrine S(OIl E Lemieux 197 CONTRIBUTORS 212 PHOTO CREDITS 2ll 2003, by rhe Court HisroricJi Jr Housc NE. ISf:lN O-I4785-32-X 10594329 Introduction Melvin I. Urofsky Those of us responsible for the contents This issue of the Journal once again of the Journal ofSupreme Court History have ranges across a wide spectrum of topics. Jus­ learned, much to our joy, that there appears to tice Sandra Day O'Connor gave the annuallec­ be no real limit on what can legitimately come ture at the Society's meeting last June, and her within the stated parameters of our mission­ topic is of great importance to students of the namely, to chronicle the history ofthe Supreme Court. Certainly no Chief Justice since John Court of the United States. We do not, of Marshall was as concerned about the Court course, run articles of doctrinal analysis, con­ speaking with one voice as William Howard sidering that area to be the purview of the Taft, a man once dismissed as inconsequential law reviews. Clearly, some doctrinal analysis is but who has been greatly redeemed by newer necessary when dealing with a court, but our scholarship that emphasizes hi s real skills at rule is that the historical aspects take prece­ leadership on the bench. dence to the doctrinal, always aware that the We have other articles in this issue on Jus­ two cannot be easily separated. tices, and this gives me a great deal of satis­ In making our selections, I am often re­ faction, since I have spent much of my pro­ minded of that wonderful quote from the leg­ fessional life dealing with biography. John D. endary Harvard law teacher, Thomas Reed Fassett, once a clerk to Justice Stanley Reed, Powell: "Ifyou think that you can think about a writes about the rather bizarre relationship be­ thing, inextricably attached to something else, tween his Justice and that great proselytizer, without thinking of the thing it is attached to, Felix Frankfurter. What is interesting is that then you have a legal mind." Those of us at the many new Justices, once they had been as­ lournal do have to think about connections. In saulted by Frankfurter, wanted as little as pos­ that way, at least, perhaps we can distinguish sible to do with him. But Reed seems to have between the legal and the editorial minds. taken it all in stride, and aside from Robert v vi JOURNAL SUPREME COURT HISTORY H. Jackson, may have had the best relationship Sharp's interest in this question led him to do with Frankfurter on the Court at that the and we are glad to publish the time. results. My article derives from a talk I was in­ The remaining two Michael 1. C. vited to at the Woodrow Wilson House on Ableman v. Booth and Scott E. in Washington. I am to the Lemieux's on v. Madison, me for me to rethink some of the issues back to my comments on doctrinal involved in that appointment. analysis and In both of these cases, of powers is, one of any effort to study the doctrine outside the con­ the favorite of teachers of both law and text of history-or vice versa-is clearly use­ political but what when past less. History and doctrine walk hand in hand or future Presidents appear as attorneys before through great cases, as they do through the the high court? And how well do they do? Allen pages of this Journal. "A More Perfect Union": Ableman v.. Booth and the Culmination of Federal Sovereignty J. TAYLOR Thesis The discourse over federal versus state jurisdiction was ingrained into American at the nation's It has been the ofour most historically significant rivalries-between Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Andrew Jackson and and Daniel Web­ ster and Robert this debate remains a contentious Court settled the on the eve ofAmerica's bloodiest conflagration.
Recommended publications
  • The Political Effects of the Addition of Judgeships to the United States Supreme Court Following Electoral Realignments

    The Political Effects of the Addition of Judgeships to the United States Supreme Court Following Electoral Realignments

    A Compliant Court: The Political Effects of the Addition of Judgeships to the United States Supreme Court Following Electoral Realignments Lauren Paige Joyce Judson Thesis submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of: Master of Arts In Political Science Jason P. Kelly, Chair Wayne D. Moore Karen M. Hult August 7, 2014 Blacksburg, Virginia Keywords: Judicial Politics, Electoral Realignment, Alteration to the Supreme Court Copyright 2014, Lauren J. Judson A Compliant Court: The Political Effects of the Addition of Judgeships to the United States Supreme Court Following Electoral Realignments Lauren J. Judson ABSTRACT During periods of turmoil when ideological preferences between the federal branches of government fail to align, the relationship between the three quickly turns tumultuous. Electoral realignments especially have the potential to increase tension between the branches. When a new party replaces the “old order” in both the legislature and the executive branches, the possibility for conflict emerges with the Court. Justices who make decisions based on old regime preferences of the party that had appointed them to the bench will likely clash with the new ideological preferences of the incoming party. In these circumstances, the president or Congress may seek to weaken the influence of the Court through court-curbing methods. One example Congress may utilize is changing the actual size of the Supreme The size of the Supreme Court has increased four times in United States history, and three out of the four alterations happened after an electoral realignment. Through analysis of Supreme Court cases, this thesis seeks to determine if, after an electoral realignment, holdings of the Court on issues of policy were more congruent with the new party in power after the change in composition as well to examine any change in individual vote tallies of the justices driven by the voting behavior of the newly appointed justice(s).
  • The Meaning of Conservatism Free

    The Meaning of Conservatism Free

    FREE THE MEANING OF CONSERVATISM PDF Roger Scruton | 220 pages | 26 Nov 2012 | St. Augustine's Press | 9781587315039 | English | South Bend, Indiana, United States The Meaning of Conservatism | Roger Scruton | Palgrave Macmillan The Meaning of Conservatism. Roger Scruton. First published inThe Meaning of Conservatism is now recognized as a major contribution to political thought, and the liveliest and most provocative modern statement of the traditional "paleo-conservative" position. Roger Scruton challenges those who would regard themselves as conservatives, and also their opponents. Conservatism, he argues, has little in common with liberalism, and is only tenuously related to the market economy, to monetarism, to free enterprise, or to capitalism. The Meaning of Conservatism involves neither hostility toward the state, nor the desire to limit the state's obligation toward the citizen. Its conceptions of society, law, and citizenship regard the individual not The Meaning of Conservatism the premise but as the conclusion of politics. At the same time it is fundamentally opposed to the ethic of social justice, to equality of station, opportunity, income, and achievement, and to the attempt to bring major institutions of society - such as schools and universities - under government control. Authority and Allegiance. Constitution and the State. The Conservative Attitude. The Meaning of Conservatism | SpringerLink Conservatism is a political and social philosophy promoting traditional social institutions in the context of culture and civilization. The central tenets of conservatism include traditionhierarchyand authorityas established in respective cultures, as well as property rights. Historically associated with right-wing politicsthe term has since been used to describe a wide range of views.
  • Understanding Stephen Harper

    Understanding Stephen Harper

    HARPER Edited by Teresa Healy www.policyalternatives.ca Photo: Hanson/THE Tom CANADIAN PRESS Understanding Stephen Harper The long view Steve Patten CANAdIANs Need to understand the political and ideological tem- perament of politicians like Stephen Harper — men and women who aspire to political leadership. While we can gain important insights by reviewing the Harper gov- ernment’s policies and record since the 2006 election, it is also essential that we step back and take a longer view, considering Stephen Harper’s two decades of political involvement prior to winning the country’s highest political office. What does Harper’s long record of engagement in conservative politics tell us about his political character? This chapter is organized around a series of questions about Stephen Harper’s political and ideological character. Is he really, as his support- ers claim, “the smartest guy in the room”? To what extent is he a con- servative ideologue versus being a political pragmatist? What type of conservatism does he embrace? What does the company he keeps tell us about his political character? I will argue that Stephen Harper is an economic conservative whose early political motivations were deeply ideological. While his keen sense of strategic pragmatism has allowed him to make peace with both conservative populism and the tradition- alism of social conservatism, he continues to marginalize red toryism within the Canadian conservative family. He surrounds himself with Governance 25 like-minded conservatives and retains a long-held desire to transform Canada in his conservative image. The smartest guy in the room, or the most strategic? When Stephen Harper first came to the attention of political observers, it was as one of the leading “thinkers” behind the fledgling Reform Party of Canada.
  • In Defence of the Court's Integrity

    In Defence of the Court's Integrity

    In Defence of the Court’s Integrity 17 In Defence of the Court’s Integrity: The Role of Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes in the Defeat of the Court-Packing Plan of 1937 Ryan Coates Honours, Durham University ‘No greater mistake can be made than to think that our institutions are fixed or may not be changed for the worse. We are a young nation and nothing can be taken for granted. If our institutions are maintained in their integrity, and if change shall mean improvement, it will be because the intelligent and the worthy constantly generate the motive power which, distributed over a thousand lines of communication, develops that appreciation of the standards of decency and justice which we have delighted to call the common sense of the American people.’ Hughes in 1909 ‘Our institutions were not designed to bring about uniformity of opinion; if they had been, we might well abandon hope.’ Hughes in 1925 ‘While what I am about to say would ordinarily be held in confidence, I feel that I am justified in revealing it in defence of the Court’s integrity.’ Hughes in the 1940s In early 1927, ten years before his intervention against the court-packing plan, Charles Evans Hughes, former Governor of New York, former Republican presidential candidate, former Secretary of State, and most significantly, former Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, delivered a series 18 history in the making vol. 3 no. 2 of lectures at his alma mater, Columbia University, on the subject of the Supreme Court.1 These lectures were published the following year as The Supreme Court: Its Foundation, Methods and Achievements (New York: Columbia University Press, 1928).
  • Information to Users

    Information to Users

    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. University M crct. rrs it'terrjt onai A Be" 4 Howe1 ir”?r'"a! Cor"ear-, J00 Norte CeeD Road App Artjor mi 4 6 ‘Og ' 346 USA 3 13 761-4’00 600 sC -0600 Order Number 9238197 Selected literary letters of Sophia Peabody Hawthorne, 1842-1853 Hurst, Nancy Luanne Jenkins, Ph.D.
  • New York City Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith (2)

    New York City Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith (2)

    The original documents are located in Box 16, folder “6/11/75 - New York City Anti- Defamation League of B'nai B'rith (2)” of the Sheila Weidenfeld Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald R. Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Digitized from Box 16 of the Sheila Weidenfeld Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library PURPOSE& ' .. PURPOSE& PROGRAM ADL: Yesterday and Today The Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith is one of the nation's oldest and leading human rela­ tions agencies. It is dedicated in purpose and program to translating this country's heritage of democratic ideals into a way of life for all Americans in our time. AD L was founded in 1913 with a handful of stationery, two desks in a Chicago law office, and a group of determined volunteers who set as its goal "to end the defamation of the Jewish people ... to secure justice and fair treatment for all citizens alike." Overt and unabashed anti-Semitism was the order of the day: resort advertising that read, "No do~! No Jews!"; offensive caricatures of Jews in magazine cartoons; crude and cruel stereotypes on stage and screen; best-seller circulation of such anti­ Semitic documents as "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion"; the trial by prejudice of Leo Frank, a "Yankee Jew" accused of rape and murder in Atlanta, Ga., a few years after the Bellus "ritual murder" case in Russia.
  • Orizzontecina Grafica E Impaginazione:E Grafica

    Orizzontecina Grafica E Impaginazione:E Grafica

    orizzonteCina grafica e impaginazione:grafica www.glamlab.it Il 50° anniversario della normalizzazione delle relazioni diplomatiche tra Repubblica italiana e Repubblica popolare cinese (6 novembre 1970-2020) cade in corrispondenza di un significativo Italia e Cina: deterioramento del quadro politico ed economico internazionale. La pandemia da COVID-19, gli effetti del “momento 50 anni di relazioni jacksoniano” sulla politica estera statunitense sotto la presidenza Trump, e Tra status e agency: Cina e Italia a 50 anni dalla normalizzazione la crescente fermezza dell’Unione Europea delle relazioni | Giovanni B. Andornino nei confronti di Pechino hanno accelerato “Reality check”: le relazioni bilaterali Italia-Cina in ambito il riallineamento dei fattori che hanno sino economico dagli anni Settanta alle “nuove Vie della Seta” ad ora abilitato l’agenda di “rigenerazione della nazione cinese” perseguita dal Partito- | Giuseppe Gabusi e Giorgio Prodi Stato cinese sotto la guida di Xi Jinping. Il L’ascesa del populismo e il suo impatto sulle relazioni sino-europee comunicato diramato al termine della 5ª | Sun Fanglu sessione plenaria del 19° Comitato centrale del Partito comunista cinese lo scorso 29 Il Mediterraneo allargato e la Cina come “offshore balancer” ottobre 2020 riflette questa consapevolezza | Andrea Ghiselli e Maria Grazia Giuffrida e segnala come i vertici del Partito-Stato constatino un “profondo modificarsi Italia-Cina: le interazioni in ambito navale e la proiezione cinese nel dell’equilibrio di potenza internazionale”. Mediterraneo
  • The Hughes-Roberts Visit

    The Hughes-Roberts Visit

    THE HUGHES-ROBERTS VISIT Barry Cushman† HE BEHAVIOR OF JUSTICE OWEN ROBERTS in the minimum wage cases that came before the Supreme Court of the United States in 1936 and 1937 has long been the subject of scholarly interest and debate. In Morehead v. New York Tex rel. Tipaldo , decided in June of 1936, Justice Roberts joined the Four Horsemen in striking down New York’s minimum wage stat- ute for women.1 The following term, however, Justice Roberts supplied the crucial fifth vote to uphold the Washington State min- imum wage law in West Coast Hotel v. Parrish.2 The question that has long preoccupied scholars is, of course, what accounts for this “switch”? In an article published in the North Carolina Law Review in 2005, Professor William Leuchtenburg observed that several explanations for Roberts’ conduct in the minimum wage cases have been offered, “with one of the most abiding that at some point [Chief Justice Charles Evans] Hughes must have taken Roberts aside and told him that, for the sake of the Court as an institution, he had to abandon the Four Horsemen.”3 Professor Leuchtenburg further reported that “At a symposium on the Court-packing crisis in which I participated † Barry Cushman is the James Monroe Distinguished Professor of Law, David H. Ibbeken ’71 Research Professor, and Professor of History, University of Virginia, and Forbes Visiting Fellow, James Madison Program, Princeton University. Copyright © 2012 Barry Cushman. 1 298 U.S. 587 (1936). 2 300 U.S. 379 (1937). 3 William E. Leuchtenburg, “Charles Evans Hughes: The Center Holds,” 83 N.C.
  • The Supreme Court of the United States

    The Supreme Court of the United States

    The Supreme Court of the United States Hearings and Reports on the Successful and Unsuccessful Nominations Now Includes the Kavanaugh and Preliminary Barrett Volumes! This online set contains all existing Senate documents for 1916 to date, as a result of the hearings and subsequent hearings on Supreme Court nominations� Included in the volumes are hearings never before made public! The series began with three volumes devoted to the controversial confirmation of Louis Brandeis, the first nominee subject to public hearings. The most recent complete volumes cover Justice Kavanaugh. After two years, the Judiciary Committee had finally released Kavanaugh’s nomination hearings, so we’ve been able to complete the online volumes� The material generated by Kavanaugh’s nomination was so voluminous that it takes up 8 volumes� The definitive documentary history of the nominations and confirmation process, this ongoing series covers both successful and unsuccessful nominations� As a measure of its importance, it is now consulted by staff of the Senate Judiciary Committee as nominees are considered� Check your holdings and complete your print set! Volume 27 (1 volume) 2021 Amy Coney Barrett �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������Online Only Volume 26 (8 volumes) - 2021 Brett Kavanaugh ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������Online Only Volume 25 (2 books) - 2018 Neil M� Gorsuch ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������$380�00
  • All Rise: Factors Affecting Decision Making of United States Supreme Court Justices

    All Rise: Factors Affecting Decision Making of United States Supreme Court Justices

    Tenor of Our Times Volume 9 Article 15 Spring 2020 All Rise: Factors Affecting Decision Making of United States Supreme Court Justices Benjamin L. Barker Harding University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.harding.edu/tenor Part of the American Politics Commons Recommended Citation Barker, Benjamin L. (Spring 2020) "All Rise: Factors Affecting Decision Making of United States Supreme Court Justices," Tenor of Our Times: Vol. 9, Article 15. Available at: https://scholarworks.harding.edu/tenor/vol9/iss1/15 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts & Humanities at Scholar Works at Harding. It has been accepted for inclusion in Tenor of Our Times by an authorized editor of Scholar Works at Harding. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Author Bio: Benjamin L. Barker is a senior political science major from McGregor, Texas. He is involved in men’s social club TNT, Pi Sigma Alpha, and the American Studies Institute. After graduation, he will marry his fiancée Anna in June and they will move to Knoxville, Tennessee, where he will attend the University of Tennessee School of Law. 154 ALL RISE: FACTORS AFFECTING DECISION MAKING OF UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT JUSTICES By Benjamin L. Barker Chapter 1: Introduction American society perceives judges as the paragon of fairness and insulation from petty politics.1 Even Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. holds this view.2 Despite this perception, this supposed fairness and apolitical nature rarely seem to actually happen with the Supreme Court. Bitter debate over highly publicized cases combined with contentious confirmation hearings suggests that the Supreme Court makes decisions based on more than just the law in question and the Constitution.
  • Supreme Court Justices

    Supreme Court Justices

    The Supreme Court Justices Supreme Court Justices *asterick denotes chief justice John Jay* (1789-95) Robert C. Grier (1846-70) John Rutledge* (1790-91; 1795) Benjamin R. Curtis (1851-57) William Cushing (1790-1810) John A. Campbell (1853-61) James Wilson (1789-98) Nathan Clifford (1858-81) John Blair, Jr. (1790-96) Noah Haynes Swayne (1862-81) James Iredell (1790-99) Samuel F. Miller (1862-90) Thomas Johnson (1792-93) David Davis (1862-77) William Paterson (1793-1806) Stephen J. Field (1863-97) Samuel Chase (1796-1811) Salmon P. Chase* (1864-73) Olliver Ellsworth* (1796-1800) William Strong (1870-80) ___________________ ___________________ Bushrod Washington (1799-1829) Joseph P. Bradley (1870-92) Alfred Moore (1800-1804) Ward Hunt (1873-82) John Marshall* (1801-35) Morrison R. Waite* (1874-88) William Johnson (1804-34) John M. Harlan (1877-1911) Henry B. Livingston (1807-23) William B. Woods (1881-87) Thomas Todd (1807-26) Stanley Matthews (1881-89) Gabriel Duvall (1811-35) Horace Gray (1882-1902) Joseph Story (1812-45) Samuel Blatchford (1882-93) Smith Thompson (1823-43) Lucius Q.C. Lamar (1883-93) Robert Trimble (1826-28) Melville W. Fuller* (1888-1910) ___________________ ___________________ John McLean (1830-61) David J. Brewer (1890-1910) Henry Baldwin (1830-44) Henry B. Brown (1891-1906) James Moore Wayne (1835-67) George Shiras, Jr. (1892-1903) Roger B. Taney* (1836-64) Howell E. Jackson (1893-95) Philip P. Barbour (1836-41) Edward D. White* (1894-1921) John Catron (1837-65) Rufus W. Peckham (1896-1909) John McKinley (1838-52) Joseph McKenna (1898-1925) Peter Vivian Daniel (1842-60) Oliver W.
  • 1910 Journal

    1910 Journal

    SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. Monday, October 10, 1910. The court met pursuant to law. Present: Mr. Justice Harlan, Mr. Justice White, Mr. Justice McKenna, Mr. Justice Holmes, Mr. Justice Day, Mr. Justice Lurton, and Mr. Justice Hughes. Mr. Justice Harlan, Presiding Justice, said: "Gentlemen of the Bar: Since the last term the Honorable Charles Evans Hughes has been appointed an associate justice of this court to fill the vacancy occasioned by the death of Mr. Justice Brewer. Mr. Hughes is present and prepared to take the required oath of office. The court extends a most cordial welcome to the new member. The clerk will read his commission and administer the oath." The clerk then read the commission and Mr. Hughes took the oath of office and was escorted by the marshal to his seat on the bench. Mr. Justice Harlan continued: "Gentlemen of the Bar: Since its last session this court has sus- tained a very great loss. The earthly career of the Chief Justice has been closed by death. This sad event occurred on the 4th day of Juty of the present year at his summer residence, after nearly twenty- three years of continuous and distinguished service on this bench. He met the final summons with that calmness of spirit and compo- sure of mind that marked his whole life. From his early manhood he walked in the good way, uprightly before God and his fellow-men, and passed from this life into the life be}T ond the grave in the con- fident belief, I doubt not, that the Maker and Ruler of the Earth ordereth all things aright.