DOCSLIB.ORG

Particle Physics and the Early Universe

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Particle Physics and the Early Universe Physics monitor Stephen Hawking with schoolchildren during the COSMO-97 international workshop on particle physics in Ambleside in the English Lake District. His public lecture 'The Theory of Everything' attracted a large audience. Particle physics and the early Universe he spectacular progress of Tcosmology in recent years means that scientists have to face a dilemma. The comfort of an in­ creased understanding of the forma­ tion of a complex Universe in the Big Bang has to be reconciled with an uncomfortable awareness that the Universe we actually see is only a small fraction of all there is. The search for this missing 'dark matter' is the major goals of contemporary physics. will change in the years to come with model dependent and often difficult Theoretical and experimental experimentalists now seriously to analyse. Comprehensive reviews aspects of dark matter searches and involved in mapping the sky up to the by A. Linde (Stanford) and L. Kofman particle cosmology were the main largest distances. (Hawaii) summarized the present focus of the COSMO-97 international Much progress is expected in status. workshop on particle physics and the sharpening fine details of Some theorists boldly try to imagine early Universe. Held from 15-19 irregularities in the cosmic microwave what happened in the very first September 1997 in Ambleside in the background radiation and in deep sky moments of the Universe's history at beautiful English Lake District, the galaxy surveys. The emerging picture the 'Planck scale' where the known meeting (organized by Lancaster of mass distribution around the laws of physics crumble. University) gathered some 110 Universe will have direct implications Stephen Hawking (with his participants from around the world. for predictions from inflationary Cambridge student R. Bousso) Deciphering the script for the Big models and will be used as a model explored the consequences of his no- Bang was the main theme. discriminator, as reviewed by boundary approach, in particular the Inflation remains the only attractive J. Frieman (Fermilab), E. Kolb production and subsequent possible scenario for explaining the puzzle of (Fermilab) and D. Lyth (Lancaster). evaporation of primordial black holes. why the gross features of the cosmic Even present data can constrain (A. Liddle of Sussex analysed how microwave background radiation look some cosmological scenarios. such objects would affect the the same in all directions. Inflation A. Albrecht reported that approaches subsequent evolution of the occurred as a brief period of ex­ in which large structures in the Universe.) tremely rapid expansion a tiny Universe have grown around Others advocate using superstring fraction of a second after the Big topological defects, like cosmic ideas to glimpse the evolution of the Bang. During this time the Universe strings, are already inconsistent with Universe during the Planck era. stretched by over 40 orders of observations. At the end of inflation R. Brustein (Ben Gurion) presented magnitude and became nearly the Universe was very empty, cold, work with G. Veneziano (CERN) Euclidean in the process. This and dominated by an 'inflaton' which which addresses the issue of the beautiful idea introduced 15 years subsequently decayed to give the initial singularity in a so-called pre- ago by Alan Guth still lacks a fully particles we know today. As a result Big-Bang approach. satisfactory particle physics scenario. the temperature jumped up again Superstrings are often claimed to Understandably, this domain of and the Universe "reheated". be the theory of everything, but they research remains almost solely a While the general idea is easy to still lack understanding of their theoretical playground. However this sketch, the detailed theory is still fundamental structure. H.-P. Nilles 24 CERN Courier, January/February 1998 Physics monitor Graham Ross of Oxford suggests a scenario with several periods of inflation of the early Universe. (Munich) reviewed the presently sity, just enough to make the Uni­ much debated M(atrix)-theory which verse's expansion slow to zero at is supposed to shed a new light on infinite time. While "direct" the theory of superstrings. He argued observations currently give the ratio that robust cosmological parameters, to be about one-third of the critical like the age of the Universe, can density, large-scale flows and cluster constrain certain otherwise allowed evolution tend to give higher values, predictions from strings. R. Gregory closer to whattheorists' favour, as (Durham) considered topological reviewed by J. Primack (Santa Cruz). defects resulting from superstrings. Measurements of the R. Kallosh (Stanford) reviewed a concentrations of light nuclei such as possible connection between black deuterium and helium in the Universe holes and superstrings. from the theory of nucleosynthesis Among the other topics discussed constrain the density of conventional relating to the particle physics of the matter (protons and neutrons) to be early Universe, J. Cline (McGill) about 5% of the critical density. argued that if the observed However, visible baryons in stars and asymmetry between baryons and galaxies account for less than 1%. antibaryons is to be explained by (Louisiana State), will soon be K. Freese (Michigan) argued that the purely (supersymmetric) electroweak challenged (or confirmed) by the "missing" baryons hide in very old effects, the mass of the Higgs KARMEN experiment at the UK stars - white dwarves. S. Raby (Ohio particle responsible for electroweak Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, State) presented another exotic symmetry breaking must be below according to J. Kleinfeller (RAL), possibility of coloured dark matter 100 GeV, making it accessible at while Chorus and Nomad at CERN, following currently hotly debated CERN's LEP electron-positron represented by J. Herin (Louvain), gauge-mediated SUSY-breaking collider. are not sensitive to the LSND signal. models. The origin and subsequent K. Zuber (Dortmund) reviewed the The other 95% of the total mass in evolution of primordial magnetic prospects for neutrino oscillation the Universe is probably non- fields, still poorly understood, were searches. Evidence for such mixing baryonic and locked in some yet discussed by K. Enqvist (Helsinki) of neutrino species from atmospheric undiscovered particles which only and M. Shaposhnikov (CERN). neutrino and solar neutrinos interact weakly. Such particles, G. Senjanovic (ICTP Trieste) observations is underlined by the known as WIMPs (Weakly Interacting showed how the normally expected Japanese Super-Kamiokande Massive Particles) should be restoration of symmetries at high detector (September 1997, page 25). abundant in the Galactic halo temperatures can be evaded in the The present picture remains surrounding us. One favourite bet is presence of non-zero charge unclear, with the LSND, solar and that these will be the lightest densities. This could automatically atmospheric data implying different supersymmetric particles (LSP). solve the domain and monopole oscillations, as reviewed by Many limits on the existence of problems in cosmology. D. Caldwell (Santa Barbara). He supersymmetric particles have come Another important theme of the argued that introducing a fourth, from LEP at CERN and the Tevatron workshop was cosmological relics of sterile neutrino would help solve the at Fermilab. Better limits, or a the Big Bang, where the subject is confusion. R. Mohapatra (Maryland) discovery, should come from the more experimental. Neutrino reviewed theoretical scenarios for LHC, as reviewed by S. Katsanevas oscillations would imply that neutrinos and conjectured that (Lyon) and V. Barger (Wisconsin). neutrinos have mass and hence may physics beyond conventional Grand J. Ellis (CERN) combined experimen­ contribute to dark matter. Unified Theories may be needed to tal data from LEP with cosmology to The first possible accelerator explain the data. sharpen the limits on the LSP. observation of neutrino oscillations Inflation in Big Bang cosmology R. Arnowitt (Texas A&M) and P. Nath from the Los Alamos LSND says that the Universe's mass (Northeastern) considered the WIMP experiment, presented by R. Imlay density is equal to the critical den­ in the context of supersymmetric CERN Courier, January/February 1998 25 Physics monitor The chairman of COSMO-97, L Roszkowski (left) with D. Caldwell who will be organizing the next COSMO meeting (COSMO-98) at Asilomar, California. External correspondents Argonne National Laboratory, (USA) D. Ayres Brookhaven, National Laboratory, (USA) P. Yamin CEBAF Laboratory, (USA) S. Corneliussen Cornell University, (USA) D. G. Cassel DESY Laboratory, (Germany) Ilka Flegel, P. Waloschek Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, unification. The masses of experiment at Stanford using an (USA) superpartners can be squeezed by innovative cryogenic technique. Judy Jackson collider searches from below, and An intriguing signal was claimed by GSI Darmstadt, (Germany) G. Siegert increasingly accurate cosmological D. Belli (INFN Rome) from the DAMA constraints from above. experiment with a heavily shielded INFN, (Italy) A. Pascolini Recent years have witnessed the sodium iodide crystal in the Italian Gran Sasso Laboratory. This IHEP, Beijing, (China) growth of an impressive experimental Qi Nading programme to hunt for WIMPs. An experiment sees a small annual JINR Dubna, (Russia) indirect way of searching for WIMP change in the putative WIMP count B. Starchenko signals is to look for energetic rate,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Supergravity and Its Legacy Prelude and the Play
    Supergravity and its Legacy Prelude and the Play Sergio FERRARA (CERN – LNF INFN) Celebrating Supegravity at 40 CERN, June 24 2016 S. Ferrara - CERN, 2016 1 Supergravity as carved on the Iconic Wall at the «Simons Center for Geometry and Physics», Stony Brook S. Ferrara - CERN, 2016 2 Prelude S. Ferrara - CERN, 2016 3 In the early 1970s I was a staff member at the Frascati National Laboratories of CNEN (then the National Nuclear Energy Agency), and with my colleagues Aurelio Grillo and Giorgio Parisi we were investigating, under the leadership of Raoul Gatto (later Professor at the University of Geneva) the consequences of the application of “Conformal Invariance” to Quantum Field Theory (QFT), stimulated by the ongoing Experiments at SLAC where an unexpected Bjorken Scaling was observed in inclusive electron- proton Cross sections, which was suggesting a larger space-time symmetry in processes dominated by short distance physics. In parallel with Alexander Polyakov, at the time in the Soviet Union, we formulated in those days Conformal invariant Operator Product Expansions (OPE) and proposed the “Conformal Bootstrap” as a non-perturbative approach to QFT. S. Ferrara - CERN, 2016 4 Conformal Invariance, OPEs and Conformal Bootstrap has become again a fashionable subject in recent times, because of the introduction of efficient new methods to solve the “Bootstrap Equations” (Riccardo Rattazzi, Slava Rychkov, Erik Tonni, Alessandro Vichi), and mostly because of their role in the AdS/CFT correspondence. The latter, pioneered by Juan Maldacena, Edward Witten, Steve Gubser, Igor Klebanov and Polyakov, can be regarded, to some extent, as one of the great legacies of higher dimensional Supergravity.
    [Show full text]
  • Subnuclear Physics: Past, Present and Future
    Subnuclear Physics: Past, Present and Future International Symposium 30 October - 2 November 2011 – The purpose of the Symposium is to discuss the origin, the status and the future of the new frontier of Physics, the Subnuclear World, whose first two hints were discovered in the middle of the last century: the so-called “Strange Particles” and the “Resonance #++”. It took more than two decades to understand the real meaning of these two great discoveries: the existence of the Subnuclear World with regularities, spontaneously plus directly broken Symmetries, and totally unexpected phenomena including the existence of a new fundamental force of Nature, called Quantum ChromoDynamics. In order to reach this new frontier of our knowledge, new Laboratories were established all over the world, in Europe, in USA and in the former Soviet Union, with thousands of physicists, engineers and specialists in the most advanced technologies, engaged in the implementation of new experiments of ever increasing complexity. At present the most advanced Laboratory in the world is CERN where experiments are being performed with the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), the most powerful collider in the world, which is able to reach the highest energies possible in this satellite of the Sun, called Earth. Understanding the laws governing the Space-time intervals in the range of 10-17 cm and 10-23 sec will allow our form of living matter endowed with Reason to open new horizons in our knowledge. Antonino Zichichi Participants Prof. Werner Arber H.E. Msgr. Marcelo Sánchez Sorondo Prof. Guido Altarelli Prof. Ignatios Antoniadis Prof. Robert Aymar Prof. Rinaldo Baldini Ferroli Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Chairman of the Opening Session
    The Universe had (probably) an origin: on singularity theorems & quantum fluctuations Emilio Elizalde ICE/CSIC & IEEC Campus UAB, Barcelona Cosmology and the Quantum Vacuum III, Benasque, Sep 4-10, 2016 Some facts (a few rather surprising...) • Adam Riess, NP 2011, at Starmus (Tenerife), about Hubble: • “Hubble obtained the distances and redshifts of distant nebulae…” • “Hubble discovered that the Universe was expanding…” • No mention to Vesto Slipher, an extraordinary astronomer • Brian Schmidt, NP 2011, at Starmus (Tenerife) & Lisa Randall, Harvard U, in Barcelona, about Einstein: SHOES- • “Einstein was the first to think about the possibility of a ‘dark energy’…” Supernovae • No mention to Fritz Zwicky, another extraordinary astronomer • Fritz Zwicky discovered dark matter in the early 1930s while studying how galaxies move within the Coma Cluster • He was also the first to postulate and use nebulae as gravitational lenses (1937) • How easily* brilliant astronomers get dismissed • How easily* scientific myths arise *in few decades How did the “Big Bang” get its name ? http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/space/universe/scientists/fred_hoyle • Sir Fred Hoyle (1915–2001) English astronomer noted primarily for the theory of stellar nucleosynthesis (1946,54 groundbreaking papers) • Work on Britain's radar project with Hermann Bondi and Thomas Gold • William Fowler NP’83: “The concept of nucleosynthesis in stars was first established by Hoyle in 1946” • He found the idea universe had a beginning to be pseudoscience, also arguments for a creator, “…for it's an irrational process, and can't be described in scientific terms”; “…belief in the first page of Genesis” • Hoyle-Gold-Bondi 1948 steady state theory, “creation or C-field” • BBC radio's Third Programme broadcast on 28 Mar 1949: “… for this to happen you would need such a Big Bang!” Thus: Big Bang = Impossible blow!! But now: Big Bang ≈ Inflation ! • Same underlying physics as in steady state theory, “creation or C-field” • Richard C.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is the Universe Made Of? How Old Is the Universe?
    What is the Universe made of? How old is it? Charles H. Lineweaver University of New South Wales ABSTRACT For the past 15 years most astronomers have assumed that 95% of the Universe was in some mysterious form of cold dark matter. They also assumed that the cosmo- logical constant, ΩΛ, was Einstein’s biggest blunder and could be ignored. However, recent measurements of the cosmic microwave background combined with other cos- mological observations strongly suggest that 75% of the Universe is made of cosmo- logical constant (vacuum energy), while only 20% is made of non-baryonic cold dark matter. Normal baryonic matter, the stuff most physicists study, makes up about 5% of the Universe. If these results are correct, an unknown 75% of the Universe has been identified. Estimates of the age of the Universe depend upon what it is made of. Thus, our new inventory gives us a new age for the Universe: 13.4 ± 1.6 Gyr. “The history of cosmology shows us that in every age devout people believe that they have at last discovered the true nature of the Universe.” (E. Harrison in Cosmology: The Science of the Universe 1981) 1 Progress A few decades ago cosmology was laughed at for being the only science with no data. Cosmology was theory-rich but data-poor. It attracted armchair enthusiasts spouting speculations without data to test them. It was the only science where the errors could be kept in the exponents – where you could set the speed of light c =1, not for dimensionless convenience, but because the observations were so poor that it didn’t matter.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Theory Insight from the Ads/CFT Correspondence
    Field theory insight from the AdS/CFT correspondence Daniel Z.Freedman1 and Pierre Henry-Labord`ere2 1Department of Mathematics and Center for Theoretical Physics Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 01239 E-mail: [email protected] 2LPT-ENS, 24, rue Lhomond F-75231 Paris cedex 05, France E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT A survey of ideas, techniques and results from d=5 supergravity for the conformal and mass-perturbed phases of d=4 N =4 Super-Yang-Mills theory. arXiv:hep-th/0011086v2 29 Nov 2000 1 Introduction The AdS/CF T correspondence [1, 20, 11, 12] allows one to calculate quantities of interest in certain d=4 supersymmetric gauge theories using 5 and 10-dimensional supergravity. Mirac- ulously one gets information on a strong coupling limit of the gauge theory– information not otherwise available– from classical supergravity in which calculations are feasible. The prime example of AdS/CF T is the duality between =4 SYM theory and D=10 N Type IIB supergravity. The field theory has the very special property that it is ultraviolet finite and thus conformal invariant. Many years of elegant work on 2-dimensional CF T ′s has taught us that it is useful to consider both the conformal theory and its deformation by relevant operators which changes the long distance behavior and generates a renormalization group flow of the couplings. Analogously, in d=4, one can consider a) the conformal phase of =4 SYM N b) the same theory deformed by adding mass terms to its Lagrangian c) the Coulomb/Higgs phase.
    [Show full text]
  • Graphs and Patterns in Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, Volume 73
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/pspum/073 Graphs and Patterns in Mathematics and Theoretical Physics This page intentionally left blank Proceedings of Symposia in PURE MATHEMATICS Volume 73 Graphs and Patterns in Mathematics and Theoretical Physics Proceedings of the Conference on Graphs and Patterns in Mathematics and Theoretical Physics Dedicated to Dennis Sullivan's 60th birthday June 14-21, 2001 Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York Mikhail Lyubich Leon Takhtajan Editors Proceedings of the conference on Graphs and Patterns in Mathematics and Theoretical Physics held at Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, June 14-21, 2001. 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 81Txx, 57-XX 18-XX 53Dxx 55-XX 37-XX 17Bxx. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Stony Brook Conference on Graphs and Patterns in Mathematics and Theoretical Physics (2001 : Stony Brook University) Graphs and Patterns in mathematics and theoretical physics : proceedings of the Stony Brook Conference on Graphs and Patterns in Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, June 14-21, 2001, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY / Mikhail Lyubich, Leon Takhtajan, editors. p. cm. — (Proceedings of symposia in pure mathematics ; v. 73) Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-8218-3666-8 (alk. paper) 1. Graph Theory. 2. Mathematics-Graphic methods. 3. Physics-Graphic methods. 4. Man• ifolds (Mathematics). I. Lyubich, Mikhail, 1959- II. Takhtadzhyan, L. A. (Leon Armenovich) III. Title. IV. Series. QA166.S79 2001 511/.5-dc22 2004062363 Copying and reprinting. Material in this book may be reproduced by any means for edu• cational and scientific purposes without fee or permission with the exception of reproduction by services that collect fees for delivery of documents and provided that the customary acknowledg• ment of the source is given.
    [Show full text]
  • Twenty Years of the Weyl Anomaly
    CTP-TAMU-06/93 Twenty Years of the Weyl Anomaly † M. J. Duff ‡ Center for Theoretical Physics Physics Department Texas A & M University College Station, Texas 77843 ABSTRACT In 1973 two Salam prot´eg´es (Derek Capper and the author) discovered that the conformal invariance under Weyl rescalings of the metric tensor 2 gµν(x) Ω (x)gµν (x) displayed by classical massless field systems in interac- tion with→ gravity no longer survives in the quantum theory. Since then these Weyl anomalies have found a variety of applications in black hole physics, cosmology, string theory and statistical mechanics. We give a nostalgic re- view. arXiv:hep-th/9308075v1 16 Aug 1993 CTP/TAMU-06/93 July 1993 †Talk given at the Salamfest, ICTP, Trieste, March 1993. ‡ Research supported in part by NSF Grant PHY-9106593. When all else fails, you can always tell the truth. Abdus Salam 1 Trieste and Oxford Twenty years ago, Derek Capper and I had embarked on our very first post- docs here in Trieste. We were two Salam students fresh from Imperial College filled with ideas about quantizing the gravitational field: a subject which at the time was pursued only by mad dogs and Englishmen. (My thesis title: Problems in the Classical and Quantum Theories of Gravitation was greeted with hoots of derision when I announced it at the Cargese Summer School en route to Trieste. The work originated with a bet between Abdus Salam and Hermann Bondi about whether you could generate the Schwarzschild solution using Feynman diagrams. You can (and I did) but I never found out if Bondi ever paid up.) Inspired by Salam, Capper and I decided to use the recently discovered dimensional regularization1 to calculate corrections to the graviton propaga- tor from closed loops of massless particles: vectors [1] and spinors [2], the former in collaboration with Leopold Halpern.
    [Show full text]
  • Supergravity at 40: Reflections and Perspectives(∗)
    RIVISTA DEL NUOVO CIMENTO Vol. 40, N. 6 2017 DOI 10.1393/ncr/i2017-10136-6 ∗ Supergravity at 40: Reflections and perspectives( ) S. Ferrara(1)(2)(3)andA. Sagnotti(4) (1) Theoretical Physics Department, CERN CH - 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland (2) INFN - Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati - Via Enrico Fermi 40 I-00044 Frascati (RM), Italy (3) Department of Physics and Astronomy, Mani L. Bhaumik Institute for Theoretical Physics U.C.L.A., Los Angeles CA 90095-1547, USA (4) Scuola Normale Superiore e INFN - Piazza dei Cavalieri 7, I-56126 Pisa, Italy received 15 February 2017 Dedicated to John H. Schwarz on the occasion of his 75th birthday Summary. — The fortieth anniversary of the original construction of Supergravity provides an opportunity to combine some reminiscences of its early days with an assessment of its impact on the quest for a quantum theory of gravity. 280 1. Introduction 280 2. The early times 282 3. The golden age 283 4. Supergravity and particle physics 284 5. Supergravity and string theory 286 6. Branes and M-theory 287 7. Supergravity and the AdS/CFT correspondence 288 8. Conclusions and perspectives ∗ ( ) Based in part on the talk delivered by S.F. at the “Special Session of the DISCRETE2016 Symposium and the Leopold Infeld Colloquium”, in Warsaw, on December 1 2016, and on a joint CERN Courier article. c Societ`a Italiana di Fisica 279 280 S. FERRARA and A. SAGNOTTI 1. – Introduction The year 2016 marked the fortieth anniversary of the discovery of Supergravity (SGR) [1], an extension of Einstein’s General Relativity [2] (GR) where Supersymme- try, promoted to a gauge symmetry, accompanies general coordinate transformations.
    [Show full text]
  • Tinkering with Time the NEW TIME TRAVELERS: a JOURNEY to the on Our FRONTIERS of PHYSICS by DAVID TOOMEY Bookshelf W
    BOOKS & ARTS Tinkering with time THE NEW TIME TRAVELERS: A JOURNEY TO THE On our FRONTIERS OF PHYSICS BY DAVID TOOMEY bookshelf W. W. Norton & Co.: 2007. 320 pp. $25.95 Years ago, David Toomey picked up H. G. Wells’ moving clocks tick slowly, making time travel The Time Machine and couldn’t put it down. to the future possible. We now know a number The Mathematics of He was most interested in the drawing-room of solutions to Einstein’s equations of general Egypt, Mesopotamia, discussion between the time traveller and his relativity (1915) that are sufficiently twisted to China, India, and Islam: friends in which time as a fourth dimension was allow time travel to the past: Kurt Gödel’s 1949 A Sourcebook discussed, but wanted to know more about just rotating universe; the Morris–Thorne–Yurtsever edited by Victor J. Katz how that time machine might work. Toomey was wormhole (1988); the Tipler–van Stockum infinite therefore delighted to learn that that drawing- rotating cylinder, moving cosmic strings (myself), Princeton Univ. Press: room conversation continues today — this time the rotating black-hole interior (Brandon Carter), 2007. 685 pp. $75 among physicists. a Roman ring of wormholes (Matt Visser), the We’re aware that Toomey captures well the personalities Everett–Alcubierre warp drive, my and Li–Xin Li’s the ancient cultures of the ‘new time travelers’ — those physicists self-creating universe; Amos Ori’s torus; and were mathematically interested in whether time travel to the past is others. The book discusses all of these. advanced. Now possible — from Stephen Hawking’s sense of But can a time machine really be constructed? translations of early texts humour to Kip Thorne’s penchant for placing Hawking, like one of the time traveller’s sceptical from five key regions are scientific bets.
    [Show full text]
  • ACCRETION INTO and EMISSION from BLACK HOLES Thesis By
    ACCRETION INTO AND EMISSION FROM BLACK HOLES Thesis by Don Nelson Page In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California 1976 (Submitted May 20, 1976) -ii- ACKNOHLEDG:-IENTS For everything involved during my pursuit of a Ph. D. , I praise and thank my Lord Jesus Christ, in whom "all things were created, both in the heavens and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities--all things have been created through Him and for Him. And He is before all things, and in Him all things hold together" (Colossians 1: 16-17) . But He is not only the Creator and Sustainer of the universe, including the physi­ cal laws which rule and their dominion the spacetime manifold and its matter fields ; He is also my personal Savior, who was "wounded for our transgressions , ... bruised for our iniquities, .. and the Lord has lald on Him the iniquity of us all" (Isaiah 53:5-6). As the Apostle Paul expressed it shortly after Isaiah ' s prophecy had come true at least five hundred years after being written, "God demonstrates His own love tmvard us , in that while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us" (Romans 5 : 8) . Christ Himself said, " I have come that they may have life, and have it to the full" (John 10:10) . Indeed Christ has given me life to the full while I have been at Caltech, and I wish to acknowledge some of the main blessings He has granted: First I thank my advisors , KipS.
    [Show full text]
  • Personal Recollections of the Early Days Before and After the Birth of Supergravity
    Personal recollections of the early days before and after the birth of Supergravity Peter van Nieuwenhuizen I March 29, 1976: Dan Freedman, Sergio Ferrara and I submit first paper on Supergravity to Physical Review D. I April 28: Stanley Deser and Bruno Zumino: elegant reformulation that stresses the role of torsion. I June 2, 2016 at 1:30pm: 5500 papers with Supergravity in the title have appeared, and 15000 dealing with supergravity. I Supergravity has I led to the AdS/CFT miracle, and I made breakthroughs in longstanding problems in mathematics. I Final role of supergravity? (is it a solution in search of a problem?) I 336 papers in supergravity with 126 collaborators I Now: many directions I can only observe in awe from the sidelines I will therefore tell you my early recollections and some anecdotes. I will end with a new research program that I am enthusiastic about. In 1972 I was a Joliot Curie fellow at Orsay (now the Ecole Normale) in Paris. Another postdoc (Andrew Rothery from England) showed me a little book on GR by Lawden.1 I was hooked. That year Deser gave lectures at Orsay on GR, and I went with him to Brandeis. In 1973, 't Hooft and Veltman applied their new covariant quantization methods and dimensional regularization to pure gravity, using the 't Hooft lemma (Gilkey) for 1-loop divergences and the background field formalism of Bryce DeWitt. They found that at one loop, pure gravity was finite: 1 2 2 ∆L ≈ αRµν + βR = 0 on-shell. But what about matter couplings? 1\An Introduction to Tensor Calculus and Relativity".
    [Show full text]
  • Physics & Astronomy – Our Community
    Peter Koch, updated 26 March 2006 from 13 September 2005 Physics & Astronomy – Our Community Graduate student degrees awarded Stony Brook is one of the leading universities in number of physics Ph.D. degrees granted. At Stony Brook in 2003-4: 32 PhDs in 2004-5: 21 PhDs plus 3 more in August Graduate students in 2005-6 (2nd large class in a row) 41 graduate students entered last year 18 US, 13 Asia, 9 Europe, 1 Mideast 30 male, 11 female 36 for PhD program 3 Würzburg exchange students for MA degree 2 for Masters of Science in Instrumentation We aim for a somewhat smaller entering class this year. Thanks to Sara Lutterbie for slide preparation Thanks to Sara Lutterbie for slide preparation New faculty appointments Michael Zingale, computational astrophysics. Mike’s main research is on Type Ia supernovae, specifically flame instabilities. (He also blows up Type I supernovae in computers.) After a postdoc at the Supernovae Science Center at UC Santa Cruz, Mike joined us as Assistant Professor in January 2006. Three-dimensional reactive RT simulations: (in collaboration with LBL/CCSE) Three-dimensional direct numerical simulations of carbon flames in Type Ia supernovae undergoing the Rayleigh- Taylor instability and the transition to turbulence. New faculty appointments Urs Wiedemann, nuclear theory. Urs’s main research is on the theory of dense QCD matter now being studied in relativistic heavy ion collisions at RHIC at nearby Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL – co managed by Stony Brook University and Battelle Memorial Institute) and after about 2007 at the LHC at CERN. Fresh from a staff theory position at CERN, Urs joined us as Assistant Professor in January 2006 in a joint position with the RIKEN Institute at BNL.
    [Show full text]