DOCSLIB.ORG

Wellcome Witnesses to Twentieth Century Medicine: Volume 1 Tansey, EM; Christie, DA; Reynolds, LA; Catterall, PP; Willhoft, SV

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wellcome Witnesses to Twentieth Century Medicine: Volume 1 Tansey, EM; Christie, DA; Reynolds, LA; Catterall, PP; Willhoft, SV View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Queen Mary Research Online Wellcome Witnesses to Twentieth Century Medicine: Volume 1 Tansey, EM; Christie, DA; Reynolds, LA; Catterall, PP; Willhoft, SV For additional information about this publication click this link. http://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/jspui/handle/123456789/2745 Information about this research object was correct at the time of download; we occasionally make corrections to records, please therefore check the published record when citing. For more information contact [email protected] WELLCOME WITNESSES TO TWENTIETH CENTURY MEDICINE _______________________________________________________________ TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER IN BRITAIN: THE CASE OF MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES ______________________________________________ SELF AND NON-SELF: A HISTORY OF AUTOIMMUNITY ______________________ ENDOGENOUS OPIATES _____________________________________ THE COMMITTEE ON SAFETY OF DRUGS __________________________________ WITNESS SEMINAR TRANSCRIPTS EDITED BY: E M TANSEY P P CATTERALL D A CHRISTIE S V WILLHOFT L A REYNOLDS Volume One – April 1997 ©The Trustee of the Wellcome Trust, London, 1997 First published by the Wellcome Trust, 1997 Occasional Publication no. 4, 1997 The Wellcome Trust is a registered charity, no. 210183. ISBN 978 186983 579 8 Please cite as : Tansey E M, Catterall P P, Christie D A, Willhoft S V, Reynolds L A. (eds) (1997) Wellcome Witnesses to Twentieth Century Medicine, vol. 1. London: The Wellcome Trust. Key Front cover photographs, L to R: Monoclonal Antibodies: Dr Georges Köhler (1946–95), Sir Christopher Booth, Dr César Milstein (1927–2002) Endogenous Opiates: Dr Derek Smyth Endogenous Opiates: Professor John Hughes Back cover photographs, L to R: Self and Non-Self: Professor Peter Campbell, Professor Richard Batchelor, Sir Christopher Booth Committee on Safety of Drugs: Dr Tilli Tansey, Dr Stephen Lock, Mr Wilfred Turner, Professor Owen Wade (1921–2008) Committee on Safety of Drugs: Dr Josephine Weatherall, Professor Miles Weatherall, Professor David Finney Self and Non-Self: Professor Deborah Doniach (1912–2004), Professor Ivan Roitt Endogenous Opiates: Professor Lesley Rees, Professor Howard Morris CONTENTS WHAT IS A WITNESS SEMINAR? i E M TANSEY TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER IN BRITAIN: THE CASE OF MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES EDITORS: E M TANSEY AND P P CATTERALL TRANSCRIPT 1 INDEX 33 SELF AND NON-SELF: A HISTORY OF AUTOIMMUNITY EDITORS: E M TANSEY, S V WILLHOFT AND D A CHRISTIE TRANSCRIPT 35 INDEX 65 ENDOGENOUS OPIATES EDITORS: E M TANSEY AND D A CHRISTIE TRANSCRIPT 67 INDEX 100 THE COMMITTEE ON SAFETY OF DRUGS EDITORS: E M TANSEY AND L A REYNOLDS TRANSCRIPT 103 INDEX 133 WHAT IS A WITNESS SEMINAR? Advances in medical science and medical practice throughout the twentieth century, and especially after the Second World War, have proceeded at such a pace, and with such an intensity, that they provide new and genuine challenges to historians. Scientists and clinicians themselves frequently bemoan the rate at which published material proliferates in their disciplines, and the near impossibility of ‘keeping up with the literature’. Pity, then, the poor historian, trying to make sense of this mass of published data, scouring archives for unpublished accounts and illuminating details, and attempting throughout to comprehend, contextualize, reconstruct and convey to others the stories of the recent past and their significance. The extensive published record of modern medicine and medical science raises particular problems for historians: it is often presented in a piecemeal but formal fashion, sometimes seemingly designed to conceal rather than reveal the processes by which scientific medicine is conducted. As Sir Peter Medawar suggested, in his famous article, ‘Is the scientific paper a fraud’, much scientific literature ‘misrepresents the processes of thought that accompanied or gave rise to the work that is described ...’,1 not deliberately intended to deceive, but structured and arranged in a rigid format that allows for little individual expression or amplification. Recourse to unpublished archives for elucidation can introduce additional difficulties. Official archives may have limitations on access: in the UK public records are subject to a restriction that keeps papers hidden for at least 30 years. Equally, specialist archives can present problems: the survival of personal papers can be erratic, many are lost during the lifetime of an individual, as space constraints or relocation demand the jettisoning of material without proper regard for its significance. Probably even more papers are wrongly discarded as worthless and uninteresting by their owners, or by relatives acting immediately after a bereavement.2 Thus historians of contemporary medicine and science are increasingly turning, or returning, to the traditional technique of oral history to supplement, or extend, existing records, and to create new resources.3 Recognizing that many of the principal sources of contemporary medical history are still walking around, although on increasingly elderly and fragile legs, they are attempting to hear, and record, their accounts. A particularly specialized form of oral history is the Witness Seminar, where several people associated with a particular set of circumstances or events are invited to meet together to discuss, debate, and even disagree about their reminiscences. Originally developed by the Institute of Contemporary British History (ICBH), this format attracted the attention of the History of Twentieth 1 Medawar P. (1990) Is the scientific paper a fraud? In Pyke D. (ed.), The Threat and the Glory: Reflections on Science and Scientists. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 228–233. 2 See Booth C C, Sheppard J G, Tansey E M. (1990) Archives of contemporary medicine and science. British Medical Journal 301: 1408. 3 See Tansey E M. (1995) Telling it like it was. New Scientist 148(2008): 49. i What is a Witness Seminar? Century Medicine Group, which was inaugurated by the Wellcome Trust in 1990, to bring together clinicians, scientists, historians and others interested in contemporary medical history. An initial experiment was to organize a meeting with the ICBH on the subject of ‘Monoclonal Antibodies’, which was held in September 1993. The response from those taking part or attending that meeting, and subsequent requests for the transcript, convinced the Steering Committee of the History of Twentieth Century Medicine Group that this forum should be developed. During the following summer a meeting on ‘Renal Transplantation’ was organized, and in the academic year 1994–1995 a number of smaller ‘mini’ Witness Seminars were included as part of the routine programme of the group. Since then Witness Seminars have become a regular feature of the Group’s activities, and subjects are usually proposed by, or through, members of the Steering Committee of the Group. From 1990–1995 this comprised Sir Christopher Booth (Chair), Dr Tilli Tansey (Secretary), Professor Bill Bynum and Dr Stephen Lock. They were joined in 1995 by Dr Lara Marks and Professor Tom Treasure, and in the following year by Dr David Gordon. Meetings already held or planned for the current academic year are listed opposite. Once a suitable subject has been agreed, we try to identify and invite participants, and to plan, in conjunction with the meeting’s chairman, a flexible outline plan for the progress of the meeting. Occasionally we have had to abandon or postpone meetings at this stage if key people are unable to attend. This is a constant problem when many we invite are elderly. Similarly, some meetings can be disrupted at the last minute by accidents or ill-health: sadly the late Professor Charles Fletcher suffered a bad and incapacitating fall just days before he was due to join Dr Philip D’Arcy Hart as one of the two principal witnesses at the ‘Pneumoconiosis’ meeting. Invitations inevitably lead to further contacts, further suggestions of people to invite, and we rely heavily on such recommendations. As the organization of the meeting progresses, we ask some participants to be principal witnesses; to speak for a short period of time to initiate and stimulate further discussion. Again, these arrangements differ from meeting to meeting, although all speakers are asked not to prepare formal presentations or to show slides, as these disrupt informal interchange. Thus by the time each meeting is held, it has already developed its own particular shape determined by the participants. For example, no one could dispute that ‘Endogenous Opiates’ would undoubtedly have been a different kind of seminar, not necessarily better or worse but different, if Hans Kosterlitz had been able to attend; or that ‘Monoclonal Antibodies’ would have been markedly different if the National Research Development Corporation had sent a representative who had been personally involved with the patenting issues that were raised. As each meeting proceeds it also develops its own kinetics, largely dependent on the personalities of the chairman and the participants, and the relationships among those taking part. No two meetings have ever been the same. Each meeting is fully recorded, and the tapes are transcribed. The Steering Committee then decides whether the transcript should be edited for publication. This decision is informed by two main factors – the overall coherence of the meeting, and whether the transcript will contribute new material to the published ii What is a Witness Seminar?
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Haemophilia: Recent History of Clinical Management
    HAEMOPHILIA: RECENT HISTORY OF CLINICAL MANAGEMENT The transcript of a Witness Seminar held at the Wellcome Institute for the History of Medicine, London, on 10 February 1998 Edited by D A Christie and E M Tansey HAEMOPHILIA: RECENT HISTORY OF CLINICAL MANAGEMENT Participants Dr Derek Bangham Professor Ilsley Ingram Dr Ethel Bidwell Dr Peter Jones Sir Christopher Booth Professor Christine Lee (Chair) Dr Brian Colvin Dr James Matthews Dr Angela Dike Mrs Riva Miller Mr Ross Dike Dr Charles Rizza Dr Helen Dodsworth Rev Alan Tanner Professor Stuart Douglas* Dr Tilli Tansey Professor Robert Duthie Professor Edward Tuddenham Dr David Evans Dr David Tyrrell Dr Sheila Howarth Mr Clifford Welch Others present at the meeting: Dr Trevor Barrowcliffe, Ms Jacqui Marr, Dr J K Smith, Miss Rosemary Spooner Apologies: Professor Jean-Pierre Allain, Dr Donald Bateman, Dr Rosemary Biggs, Mrs Peggy Britten,** Professor Judith Chessells, Dr Audrey Dawson, Mr Ron Hutton, Professor Ralph Kekwick, Professor Sir David Weatherall *Deceased 15 November 1998 **Deceased 1 March 1999 2 Haemophilia: Recent history Professor Christine Lee:1 I think haemophilia is one of the best areas of clinical medicine where we have seen a very rapid introduction of scientific discovery into clinical practice. All of us who work on haemophilia realize that this has gone on very much with cooperation between the patients and the scientists and the doctors. I first saw haemophilia in 1967 when I was a medical student in Oxford and we were doing our orthopaedics at the Nuffield Orthopaedic Hospital. I have a very clear memory of a ward of little boys with their legs strung up, their arms strung up, and I think there was a schoolroom nearby.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Pharmacology in the UK, C. 1950–2000: Industry and Regulation
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY IN THE UK, c. 1950–2000: INDUSTRY AND REGULATION The transcript of a Witness Seminar held by the Wellcome Trust Centre for the History of Medicine at UCL, London, on 25 September 2007 Edited by L A Reynolds and E M Tansey Volume 34 2008 ©The Trustee of the Wellcome Trust, London, 2008 First published by the Wellcome Trust Centre for the History of Medicine at UCL, 2008 The Wellcome Trust Centre for the History of Medicine at UCL is funded by the Wellcome Trust, which is a registered charity, no. 210183. ISBN 978 085484 118 9 All volumes are freely available online at: www.history.qmul.ac.uk/research/modbiomed/wellcome_witnesses/ Please cite as: Reynolds L A, Tansey E M. (eds) (2008) Clinical Pharmacology in the UK c.1950-2000: Industry and regulation. Wellcome Witnesses to Twentieth Century Medicine, vol. 34. London: Wellcome Trust Centre for the History of Medicine at UCL. CONTENTS Illustrations and credits v Abbreviations vii Witness Seminars: Meetings and publications; Acknowledgements E M Tansey and L A Reynolds ix Introduction Professor Parveen Kumar xxiii Transcript Edited by L A Reynolds and E M Tansey 1 References 73 Biographical notes 89 Glossary 103 Index 109 ILLUSTRATIONS AND CREDITS Figure 1 AstraZeneca Clinical Trials Unit, South Manchester. Reproduced by permission of AstraZeneca. 6 Figure 2 A summary of the organization of clinical trials. Adapted from www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/info/glossary (visited 1 May 2008). 10 Figure 3 Clinical trial certificates (CTC) and clinical trial exemption (CTX), 1972–1985. Adapted from Speirs (1983) and Speirs (1984).
    [Show full text]
  • Harper, Peter: Transcript of a Video Interview (06-Jun-2015)
    History of Modern Biomedicine Research Group School of History, Queen Mary University of London Mile End Road, London E1 4NS website: www.histmodbiomed.org VIDEO INTERVIEW TRANSCRIPT Harper, Peter: transcript of a video interview (06-Jun-2015) Interviewer: Tilli Tansey Transcriber: Debra Gee Editors: Tilli Tansey, Alan Yabsley Date of publication: 20-Mar-2017 Date and place of interview: 06-Jun-2015; Glasgow Publisher: Queen Mary University of London Collection: History of Modern Biomedicine Interviews (Digital Collection) Reference: e2017093 Number of pages: 4 DOI: 10.17636/01021439 Acknowledgments: The project management of Mr Adam Wilkinson is gratefully acknowledged. The History of Modern Biomedicine Research Group is funded by the Wellcome Trust, which is a registered charity (no. 210183). The current interview has been funded by the Wellcome Trust Strategic Award entitled “Makers of modern biomedicine: testimonies and legacy” (2012-2017; awarded to Professor Tilli Tansey). Citation: Tansey E M (intvr); Tansey E M, Yabsley A (eds) (2017) Harper, Peter: transcript of a video interview (06-Jun- 2015). History of Modern Biomedicine Interviews (Digital Collection), item e2017093. London: Queen Mary University of London. Related resources: items 2017094 - 2017099, History of Modern Biomedicine Interviews (Digital Collection) Note: Video interviews are conducted following standard oral history methodology, and have received ethical approval (reference QMREC 0642). Video interview transcripts are edited only for clarity and factual accuracy. Related material has been deposited in the Wellcome Library. © The Trustee of the Wellcome Trust, London, 2017 History of Modern Biomedicine Interviews (Digital Collection) - Harper, P e2017093 | 2 Harper, Peter: transcript of a video interview (06-Jun-2015)* Biography: Professor Peter Harper (b.
    [Show full text]
  • Women Physiologists
    Women physiologists: Centenary celebrations and beyond physiologists: celebrations Centenary Women Hodgkin Huxley House 30 Farringdon Lane London EC1R 3AW T +44 (0)20 7269 5718 www.physoc.org • journals.physoc.org Women physiologists: Centenary celebrations and beyond Edited by Susan Wray and Tilli Tansey Forewords by Dame Julia Higgins DBE FRS FREng and Baroness Susan Greenfield CBE HonFRCP Published in 2015 by The Physiological Society At Hodgkin Huxley House, 30 Farringdon Lane, London EC1R 3AW Copyright © 2015 The Physiological Society Foreword copyright © 2015 by Dame Julia Higgins Foreword copyright © 2015 by Baroness Susan Greenfield All rights reserved ISBN 978-0-9933410-0-7 Contents Foreword 6 Centenary celebrations Women in physiology: Centenary celebrations and beyond 8 The landscape for women 25 years on 12 "To dine with ladies smelling of dog"? A brief history of women and The Physiological Society 16 Obituaries Alison Brading (1939-2011) 34 Gertrude Falk (1925-2008) 37 Marianne Fillenz (1924-2012) 39 Olga Hudlická (1926-2014) 42 Shelagh Morrissey (1916-1990) 46 Anne Warner (1940–2012) 48 Maureen Young (1915-2013) 51 Women physiologists Frances Mary Ashcroft 56 Heidi de Wet 58 Susan D Brain 60 Aisah A Aubdool 62 Andrea H. Brand 64 Irene Miguel-Aliaga 66 Barbara Casadei 68 Svetlana Reilly 70 Shamshad Cockcroft 72 Kathryn Garner 74 Dame Kay Davies 76 Lisa Heather 78 Annette Dolphin 80 Claudia Bauer 82 Kim Dora 84 Pooneh Bagher 86 Maria Fitzgerald 88 Stephanie Koch 90 Abigail L. Fowden 92 Amanda Sferruzzi-Perri 94 Christine Holt 96 Paloma T. Gonzalez-Bellido 98 Anne King 100 Ilona Obara 102 Bridget Lumb 104 Emma C Hart 106 Margaret (Mandy) R MacLean 108 Kirsty Mair 110 Eleanor A.
    [Show full text]
  • Wellcome Witnesses to Twentieth Century Medicine: Volume 2 Tansey, EM; Christie, DA; Reynolds, LA
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Queen Mary Research Online Wellcome Witnesses to Twentieth Century Medicine: Volume 2 Tansey, EM; Christie, DA; Reynolds, LA For additional information about this publication click this link. http://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/jspui/handle/123456789/2746 Information about this research object was correct at the time of download; we occasionally make corrections to records, please therefore check the published record when citing. For more information contact [email protected] WELLCOME WITNESSES TO TWENTIETH CENTURY MEDICINE _____________________________________________________________________________ MAKING THE HUMAN BODY TRANSPARENT: THE IMPACT OF NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE AND MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING _________________________________________________ RESEARCH IN GENERAL PRACTICE __________________________________ DRUGS IN PSYCHIATRIC PRACTICE ______________________ THE MRC COMMON COLD UNIT ____________________________________ WITNESS SEMINAR TRANSCRIPTS EDITED BY: E M TANSEY D A CHRISTIE L A REYNOLDS Volume Two – September 1998 ©The Trustee of the Wellcome Trust, London, 1998 First published by the Wellcome Trust, 1998 Occasional Publication no. 6, 1998 The Wellcome Trust is a registered charity, no. 210183. ISBN 978 186983 539 1 All volumes are freely available online following the links to Publications/Wellcome Witnesses at www.ucl.ac.uk/histmed Please cite as : Tansey E M, Christie D A, Reynolds L A. (eds) (1998) Wellcome Witnesses to
    [Show full text]
  • Looking at the Unborn: Hi S to R I Ca L As P E C T S of Ob S T E T R I C Ult R a S O U N D
    Wellcome Witnesses to Twentieth Century Medicine LOOKING AT THE UNBORN: HI S TO R I CA L AS P E C T S OF OB S T E T R I C ULT R A S O U N D Volume 5 – January 2000 A Witness Seminar held at the Wellcome Institute for the History of Medicine, London, on 10 March 1998 Witness Seminar Transcript edited by E M Tansey and D A Christie ©The Trustee of the Wellcome Trust, London, 2000 First published by the Wellcome Trust, 2000 The Wellcome Trust is a registered charity, no. 210183. ISBN 978 184129 011 9 All volumes are freely available online at: www.history.qmul.ac.uk/research/modbiomed/wellcome_witnesses/ Please cite as: Tansey E M, Christie D A. (eds) (2000) Looking at the Unborn: Historical aspects of obstetric ultrasound. Wellcome Witnesses to Twentieth Century Medicine, vol. 5. London: Wellcome Trust. Key Front cover photographs, L to R from the top: Dr Tony Whittingham Mr Usama Abdulla, Mr Thomas Brown, Mr Demetrios Economides Professor Charles Whitfield, Dr Margaret McNay Dr James Willocks, Mrs Lois Reynolds Dr Marcolm Nicolson, Professor Norman McDicken Mr John Fleming, Dr Angus Hall (chair) Mr Thomas Brown, Dr Tony Whittingham Mr Usama Abdulla, Professor Peter Wells Back cover photographs, L to R from the top: Mr Thomas Brown Audience Dr Malcolm Nicolson, Dr Angus Hall (chair) : Professor Norman McDicken, Mrs Alix Donald Dr Norman Slark Professor John MacVicar Dr Angus Hall (chair) CONTENTS Introduction E M Tansey i Transcript 1 List of plates Figure 1. Ian Donald. 6 Figure 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Genetics 1990–2009
    Portfolio Review Human Genetics 1990–2009 June 2010 Acknowledgements The Wellcome Trust would like to thank the many people who generously gave up their time to participate in this review. The project was led by Liz Allen, Michael Dunn and Claire Vaughan. Key input and support was provided by Dave Carr, Kevin Dolby, Audrey Duncanson, Katherine Littler, Suzi Morris, Annie Sanderson and Jo Scott (landscaping analysis), and Lois Reynolds and Tilli Tansey (Wellcome Trust Expert Group). We also would like to thank David Lynn for his ongoing support to the review. The views expressed in this report are those of the Wellcome Trust project team – drawing on the evidence compiled during the review. We are indebted to the independent Expert Group, who were pivotal in providing the assessments of the Wellcome Trust’s role in supporting human genetics and have informed ‘our’ speculations for the future. Finally, we would like to thank Professor Francis Collins, who provided valuable input to the development of the timelines. The Wellcome Trust is a charity registered in England and Wales, no. 210183. Contents Acknowledgements 2 Overview and key findings 4 Landmarks in human genetics 6 1. Introduction and background 8 2. Human genetics research: the global research landscape 9 2.1 Human genetics publication output: 1989–2008 10 3. Looking back: the Wellcome Trust and human genetics 14 3.1 Building research capacity and infrastructure 14 3.1.1 Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute (WTSI) 15 3.1.2 Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics 15 3.1.3 Collaborations, consortia and partnerships 16 3.1.4 Research resources and data 16 3.2 Advancing knowledge and making discoveries 17 3.3 Advancing knowledge and making discoveries: within the field of human genetics 18 3.4 Advancing knowledge and making discoveries: beyond the field of human genetics – ‘ripple’ effects 19 Case studies 22 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Dainton 1 NCUACS 112/11/02
    F.S. Dainton 1 NCUACS 112/11/02 Title: Catalogue of the papers and correspondence of Frederick Sydney Dainton, Baron Dainton of Hallam Moors FRS (1914-1997), chemist Compiled by: Timothy E. Powell, Peter Harper and Caroline Thibeaud F.S. Dainton 2 NCUACS 112/11/02 Description level: Fonds Date of material: ca 1885-2002 Extent of material: 162 boxes, ca 3,500 items Deposited in: University of Sheffield Library Reference code: GB 0200 MS 231 ã 2002 National Cataloguing Unit for the Archives of Contemporary Scientists, University of Bath. NCUACS catalogue no. 112/11/02 The work of the National Cataloguing Unit for the Archives of Contemporary Scientists in the production of this catalogue was made possible by a grant from the Goldsmiths’ Company’s Charities. F.S. Dainton 3 NCUACS 112/11/02 F.S. Dainton 4 NCUACS 112/11/02 NOT ALL THE MATERIAL IN THIS COLLECTION MAY YET BE AVAILABLE FOR CONSULTATION. ENQUIRIES SHOULD BE ADDRESSED IN THE FIRST INSTANCE TO: THE CURATOR OF SPECIAL COLLECTIONS AND UNIVERSITY ARCHIVES THE MAIN LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD SHEFFIELD F.S. Dainton 5 NCUACS 112/11/02 LIST OF CONTENTS Items Page GENERAL INTRODUCTION 5 SECTION A BIOGRAPHICAL AND PERSONAL A.1-A.539 14 SECTION B RESEARCH B.1-B.131 72 SECTION C UNIVERSITIES OF OXFORD AND CAMBRIDGE C.1-C.122 84 SECTION D UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS D.1-D.97 91 SECTION E UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM E.1-E.78 99 SECTION F UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMITTEE F.1-F.136 108 SECTION G UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD G.1-G.147 126 SECTION H HOUSE OF LORDS H.1-H.374 143 SECTION J SOCIETIES AND ORGANISATIONS J.1-J.998 174 SECTION K PUBLICATIONS K.1-K.193 283 SECTION L LECTURES L.1-L.362 301 SECTION M VISITS AND CONFERENCES M.1-M.183 342 SECTION N CORRESPONDENCE N.1-N.91 363 F.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Collecting for the Furture of Medical History
    A Healthy Heritage Collecting for the Future of Medical History Proceedings of a conference held at the Wellcome Trust 25–26 February 1999 Edited by Zineta Sabovic and David Pearson The Wellcome Trust London 1999 The Wellcome Trust is a registered charity, no. 210183 Trustee: The Wellcome Trust Limited Registered in England, no. 2711000 Registered office: 183 Euston Road, London NW1 2BE Contents Foreword 1 List of conference participants 2 Introduction 7 David Pearson The present and future shape of the printed medical literature 9 Bruce Madge The archival record of medical activity 13 Julia Sheppard The changing truth: capturing electronic medical knowledge 19 Jeremy Wyatt The image of medicine 24 Kelly Loughlin Why keep it all? The clinician’s viewpoint 28 Tom Treasure Why keep it? Throw it in the dustbin of history 31 Tilli Tansey The challenge of preservation 36 Helen Shenton The collection and retention policies of medical libraries today 42 Iain Milne Mapping the future of research libraries 49 Derek Law Workshop reports 53 Biographies 61 Foreword Sir Henry Wellcome, who died in 1936, amassed huge collections of books and manuscripts relating to the history of medicine, which today form the core of the Library which bears his name. Successive generations of librarians and archivists have nurtured and developed his legacy, sustaining his vision of the importance of preserving the medical record of the past to illuminate the understanding of the present and the future. The Wellcome Library today is internationally renowned as a leading centre for the study of medical history. Wellcome’s collecting vision was wide, but manageable.
    [Show full text]
  • Wellcome Witnesses to Twentieth Century Medicine
    WELLCOME WITNESSES TO TWENTIETH CENTURY MEDICINE _______________________________________________________________ TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER IN BRITAIN: THE CASE OF MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES ______________________________________________ SELF AND NON-SELF: A HISTORY OF AUTOIMMUNITY ______________________ ENDOGENOUS OPIATES _____________________________________ THE COMMITTEE ON SAFETY OF DRUGS __________________________________ WITNESS SEMINAR TRANSCRIPTS EDITED BY: E M TANSEY P P CATTERALL D A CHRISTIE S V WILLHOFT L A REYNOLDS Volume One – April 1997 CONTENTS WHAT IS A WITNESS SEMINAR? i E M TANSEY TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER IN BRITAIN: THE CASE OF MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES EDITORS: E M TANSEY AND P P CATTERALL TRANSCRIPT 1 INDEX 33 SELF AND NON-SELF: A HISTORY OF AUTOIMMUNITY EDITORS: E M TANSEY, S V WILLHOFT AND D A CHRISTIE TRANSCRIPT 35 INDEX 65 ENDOGENOUS OPIATES EDITORS: E M TANSEY AND D A CHRISTIE TRANSCRIPT 67 INDEX 100 THE COMMITTEE ON SAFETY OF DRUGS EDITORS: E M TANSEY AND L A REYNOLDS TRANSCRIPT 103 INDEX 133 WHAT IS A WITNESS SEMINAR? Advances in medical science and medical practice throughout the twentieth century, and especially after the Second World War, have proceeded at such a pace, and with such an intensity, that they provide new and genuine challenges to historians. Scientists and clinicians themselves frequently bemoan the rate at which published material proliferates in their disciplines, and the near impossibility of ‘keeping up with the literature’. Pity, then, the poor historian, trying to make sense of this mass of published data, scouring archives for unpublished accounts and illuminating details, and attempting throughout to comprehend, contextualize, reconstruct and convey to others the stories of the recent past and their significance. The extensive published record of modern medicine and medical science raises particular problems for historians: it is often presented in a piecemeal but formal fashion, sometimes seemingly designed to conceal rather than reveal the processes by which scientific medicine is conducted.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Research in Britain 1950–1980
    Wellcome Witnesses to Twentieth Century Medicine CLINICAL RESEARCH IN BRITAIN 1950–1980 A Witness Seminar held at the Wellcome Institute for the History of Medicine, London, on 9 June 1998 Witness Seminar Transcript edited by L A Reynolds and E M Tansey Introduction by David Gordon Volume 7 – September 2000 CONTENTS Introduction David Gordon i Witness Seminars: Meetings and publications iii Transcript 1 Index 67 INTRODUCTION The British, it is said, are not revolutionary by nature. However, in the last century, we created two organizations that have revolutionized the possibility and reality of clinical research, with worldwide influence. The first was the formation of the Medical Research Council (MRC). The Medical Research Council was the successor of the Medical Research Committee, appointed in 1913 to administer funds provided under the National Health Insurance Act of 1911 (see note 49). While there may be doubt whether or not these funds were intended primarily for research into tuberculosis or for medical research more generally, we cannot doubt the boldness of the step. A government set aside money for medical research, rather than devoting the funds available for a medical problem solely to prevention, diagnosis and treatment. The second revolutionary step was the creation of the National Health Service. The National Health Service Act of 1946 gave Ministers powers not only to conduct research, but also to support the research work of others. The notion of a population- wide, compre h e n s i ve healthcare system, free to the patient at the point of consultation, and able to support the clinical infrastructure of research, was truly revolutionary, and might have been impossible were it not for the appetite for social change created by the Second World War.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Space’ Meeting Called on 12 November 2015
    What can Fellows do to support women in the biomedical workforce? A report of an ‘open space’ meeting called on 12 November 2015 1 Introduction On 12 November 2015 the Academy of Medical Sciences held a meeting for women Fellows to come together to discuss the question ‘What can Fellows do to support women in the biomedical workforce?’. Over 60 women Fellows registered to attend the event (see Annex 1 for names) The event was held using an open space format, which allows groups to self-organise and collaborate around a question of shared concern. The day began with an opening circle at which participants called sessions on the topics they wanted to discuss. This report contains reports of these sessions written by the Fellow who called them. Reports of all sessions were not received. It also includes a transcript of the closing session where participants summarised their thoughts about the day and ideas for next steps. Sessions called during the opening circle: • Women’s Attitudes • Sponsorship (vs Mentoring) • Lectures by women for women • How not to be patronising • The token woman • Fellows careers are not over • Recruitment to senior positions • Ambition limitation by social pressure • Networking - the pub? • Work / life balance • Being small • “Calm Down Dear!” - dealing with sexist comments • Deciding whether and when to have children • Invisibility • How do we get more women Fellows? • Changing the culture • Pink princess • Supporting transitions • Do we involve men? How? • Does language matter? • No more 1 in 4 • Science communication at a young age • Quotas? 30% • What when women numerically dominate? • What is special about women in science? • Style 2 Session reports Women’s attitudes 1.
    [Show full text]