G-FLOWS Stage 3: Hydrogeological Conceptual Understanding of the APY Lands Groundwater System Including the Lindsay East Palaeovalley

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

G-FLOWS Stage 3: Hydrogeological Conceptual Understanding of the APY Lands Groundwater System Including the Lindsay East Palaeovalley G-FLOWS Stage 3: Hydrogeological conceptual understanding of the Anangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara (APY) Lands groundwater system including the Lindsay East Palaeovalley Andrew Love, Adrian Costar, Carmen Krapf, Yueqing Xie, Ilka Wallis, Tessa Lane, Mark Keppel, Kent Inverarity, Zijiuan Deng, Tim Munday and Neville Robinson Goyder Institute for Water Research Technical Report Series No. 20/06 www.goyderinstitute.org Goyder Institute for Water Research Technical Report Series ISSN: 1839-2725 The Goyder Institute for Water Research is a partnership between the South Australian Government through the Department for Environment and Water, CSIRO, Flinders University, the University of Adelaide, and the University of South Australia. The Institute enhances the South Australian Government’s capacity to develop and deliver science-based policy solutions in water management. It brings together the best scientists and researchers across Australia to provide expert and independent scientific advice to inform good government water policy and identify future threats and opportunities to water security. The following Associate organisations contributed to this report: Enquires should be addressed to: Goyder Institute for Water Research Level 4, Rundle Mall Plaza, 50 Rundle Mall, Adelaide, SA 5000 tel: 08 8313 5020 e-mail: [email protected] Citation Love A., Costar A., Krapf C., Xie Y., Wallis I., Lane T., Keppel M., Inverarity K., Deng Z., Munday T. and Robinson N. (2020) G-FLOWS Stage 3: Hydrogeological conceptual understanding of the APY Lands groundwater system including the Lindsay East Palaeovalley. Goyder Institute for Water Research Technical Report Series No. 20/06. Copyright © Crown in right of the State of South Australia, Department for Environment and Water. Disclaimer The Flinders University and Department of Environment and Water, as the project partners, advise that the information contained in this publication comprises general statements based on scientific research and does not warrant or represent the completeness of any information or material in this publication. The project partners do not warrant or make any representation regarding the use, or results of the use, of the information contained herein about to its correctness, accuracy, reliability, currency or otherwise and expressly disclaim all liability or responsibility to any person using the information or advice. Information contained in this document is, to the knowledge of the project partners, correct at the time of writing. Contents Executive summary............................................................................................................................................ vi Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................................................ vii 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 8 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................................. 8 1.2 Study area ................................................................................................................................... 8 1.3 Previous studies ........................................................................................................................ 11 1.4 Methods, objectives and investigations ................................................................................... 18 2 Regional groundwater conceptualisation ........................................................................................... 24 2.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 24 2.2 Regional geology ....................................................................................................................... 24 2.3 Regional hydrogeology ............................................................................................................. 33 2.4 Regional hydrostratigraphy and architecture ........................................................................... 39 2.5 Groundwater flow systems ....................................................................................................... 44 2.6 Regional tracers and chemistry ................................................................................................ 50 2.7 Groundwater recharge ............................................................................................................. 60 2.8 Numerical slice modelling ......................................................................................................... 63 3 Hydrogeological control site, Lindsay East Palaeovalley ..................................................................... 67 3.1 Geology of the Lindsay East Palaeovalley ................................................................................. 67 3.2 Lindsay East Palaeovalley architecture ..................................................................................... 82 3.3 Hydrochemistry and environmental tracers ............................................................................. 89 3.4 Environmental tracers .............................................................................................................. 94 3.5 Numerical modelling of the Lindsay East Palaeovalley at the hydrogeological control site .. 106 4 Conclusions and recommendations .................................................................................................. 112 GFLOWS Stage 3: Conceptual understanding of the groundwater system at the hydrogeological control site | i Figures Figure 1-1. Regional study area located in the APY Lands. Blue rectangle depicts location of hydrogeological control site where drilling and sampling was conducted for the project. ....................... 10 Figure 1-2. Footprint of groundwater sampling and hydrochemical analysis conducted in the APY Lands (2001, 2012, 2013, and 2014). .................................................................................................................... 12 Figure 1-3. Watertable surface contours (Varma, 2012). .......................................................................... 13 Figure 1-4. Watertable surface contours (Kretschmer and Wohling, 2014). ............................................. 14 Figure 1-5. Recent (2015-17) drilling conducted by DEW for community water supply and road building in APY Lands. .................................................................................................................................................. 16 Figure 1-6. Previous conceptual model for the NW and central parts of the Musgrave Province developed from AEM, TMI and DEM interpretation (Munday et al. 2013): (a) pre-Pliocene landscape (b) contemporary landscape. ........................................................................................................................... 17 Figure 1-7. Footprint of AEM survey conducted in 2016. The pink outline shows the SkyTEM system coverage which covers much of the study area. ........................................................................................ 19 Figure 1-8. Well survey (bore audit) conducted in the initial stages of the project................................... 21 Figure 2-1. Simplified regional structural geology of the Musgrave geological Province, surrounding sedimentary basins and location of palaeovalleys in the far north western regions of South Australia near the Western Australian and Northern Territory borders. Developed after Glorie et al. (2017), and Geoscience Australia. ................................................................................................................................. 25 Figure 2-2. Simplified surface geology across the study area. ................................................................... 27 Figure 2-3. Palaeovalley mapped extent (Krapf et al. 2020) across study area. ........................................ 28 Figure 2-4. Locations of geological cross-section transects across study area. ......................................... 29 Figure 2-5. AEM Conductivity depth section interpretation for the NW-SE transect using AEM (SkyTEM) data (see Fig. 2-4 for transect locations). ................................................................................................... 30 Figure 2-6. AEM Conductivity depth section interpretation for the N-S transect using AEM (SkyTEM) data (see Fig. 2-4 for transect locations). ........................................................................................................... 30 Figure 2-7. Final Interpreted NW-SE transect geological cross-section using existing drillhole information and geophysics. .......................................................................................................................................... 31 Figure 2-8. Final Interpreted N-S transect geological cross-section using existing drillhole information and geophysics. ................................................................................................................................................. 32 Figure 2-9. AEM depth slice 45.3 to 53.8 mBNS draped over TMI data (texture). TMI shows E-W structures. ...................................................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • APY Tourism Policy Development Report Authors
    Title: APY Tourism Policy Development Report Authors: Fiona Pemberton, Pat Katnich Date: August 2007 Ownership and Disclaimer Ownership of the intellectual property rights of ethnographic information provided by Aboriginal people remains the property of those named persons. Ownership of the primary materials created in the course of the research remains the property of the named researchers and ACHM. This report, including any intellectual property therein, remains the property of Anangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara (APY). This report may not be used, copied, sold, published, reproduced or distributed wholly or in part without the prior written consent of APY. The professional advice and opinions contained in this report are those of the consultants, Australian Cultural Heritage Management Pty Ltd and Red Dune Consultancy, and do not represent the opinions and policies of any third party. The professional advice and opinions contained in this report do not constitute legal advice. APY Tourism Policy Development Report August 2007 2 CLIENTS: Anangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara TITLE: APY Tourism Policy Development Report CONSULTANCY TEAM: ACHM Dr Neale Draper Project Management, Archaeology, Anthropology Fiona Pemberton Community Development, Research, Consultation, Report Writing Fiona Sutherland Anthropology, editing Red Dune Consultancy Pat Katnich Tourism Consultant, Research, Consultation, Report Writing APY Tourism Policy Development Report August 2007 3 Acknowledgments Australian Cultural Heritage Management (ACHM) and Red Dune
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogeological Review of the Musgrave Province, South Australia
    Hydrogeological review of the Musgrave Province, South Australia Sunil Varma Goyder Institute for Water Research Technical Report Series No. 12/8 www.goyderinstitute.org Goyder Institute for Water Research Technical Report Series ISSN: 1839-2725 The Goyder Institute for Water Research is a partnership between the South Australian Government through the Department for Environment, Water and Natural Resources, CSIRO, Flinders University, the University of Adelaide and the University of South Australia. The Institute will enhance the South Australian Government’s capacity to develop and deliver science-based policy solutions in water management. It brings together the best scientists and researchers across Australia to provide expert and independent scientific advice to inform good government water policy and identify future threats and opportunities to water security. Enquires should be addressed to: Goyder Institute for Water Research Level 1, Torrens Building 220 Victoria Square, Adelaide, SA, 5000 tel: 08-8303 8952 e-mail: [email protected] Citation Varma, S., 2012, Hydrogeological review of the Musgrave Province, South Australia, Goyder Institute for Water Research Technical Report Series No. 12/8. Copyright © 2012 CSIRO To the extent permitted by law, all rights are reserved and no part of this publication covered by copyright may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means except with the written permission of CSIRO. Disclaimer The Participants advise that the information contained in this publication comprises
    [Show full text]
  • CFS Volunteer Yearbook 2019
    THE VOLUNTEER YEARBOOK 2019 • Lightbars. • Light-Heads (Surface Mounted Flashers). • Pioneer LiFe™ Battery Operated - Portable Area Lighting. • 11”, 16” & 23” Mini Lightbars. • Pioneer™ Super-LED® Flood / Spot Lights. • Sirens, Switches & Speakers. • Dash / Deck / Visor Lighting. Pioneer LiFe™ 35 CFS Vehicle Intercom Units • 12 or 24v DC. • Crystal Clear Sound. • Waterproof Microphone. • Full Kits Available. • Australian Made! Station Sirens 240v / 415v The "Original" Floating Strainer Float Dock® Strainer Float Dock® strainers are self- levelling, there are no whirlpools Fire Truck Repairs or suction loss! • Striping • Pumps • Nozzles PAC Brackets® • Hoses The Complete answer for • Fire Damage Tools & Equipment stowage. 262 Shearer Drive Phone: 0413 935 463 Seaford South Australia, 5169 Email: [email protected] Contents p20: State Duty Commanders 4: WELCOME 6: REGIONS ROUND UP 13: INCIDENTS 18: OPERATIONS 22: DEPLOYMENTS 27: CELEBRATIONS 30: PROFILES 33: PARTNERSHIPS p15: Mount Compass 35: FRONTLINE SERVICES 41: FRONTLINE SERVICES SUPPORT 48: YOUTH 50: GENERAL 55: SPAM 56: HONOURS 60: MUSEUM 62: CFS FOUNDATION 64: OBITUARIES p22: DEW Tasmania 66: RETIREMENTS 67: CONTACT DETAILS Volunteer Yearbook is an annual publication which captures significant CFS activities and incidents from the past 12 months. The views and opinions expressed through the contributions in this publication are not necessarily those of the SA Country Fire Service or the Government of South Australia. Editorial Team Alison Martin, Brett Williamson and Simone McDonnell CFS Media Line: (08) 8115 3531 Photos: CFS Promotions Unit – www.fire-brigade.asn.au/gallery If you have any feedback about the CFS Volunteer Yearbook or any of our communications, or would like us to cover a story you think should be included, please email CFS.CorporateCommunications@ sa.gov.au p29: Salisbury Celebration 3 Welcome who provide unwavering support to all of our members as they are called to GREG NETTLETON AFSM incidents.
    [Show full text]
  • Bushwalk Australia
    Bushwalk Australia Hills & Valleys Volume 38, December 2019 2 | BWA December 2019 Bushwalk Australia Magazine An electronic magazine for bushwalk.com Volume 38, December 2019 We acknowledge the Traditional Owners of this vast land which we explore. We pay our respects to their Elders, past and present, and thank them for their stewardship of this great south land. Cover picture Camping high has its rewards - Crepuscular rays over Pokana Peak MJD Editor Matt McClelland [email protected] Design manager Eva Gomišček [email protected] Sub-editor Stephen Lake [email protected] Please send any articles, suggestions or advertising enquires to Eva. Orange Bluff via BWA Advisory Panel North-north-west 6 Great Stony Mountain Mark Fowler Brian Eglinton Best resting spot We would love you to be part of the magazine, here is how to contribute - Writer's Guide. Two State 8 peaks The copy deadline for the Two of the highest February 2020 edition is 12 31 December 2019. peaks in Australia Warning Sassafras to Wog Wog Like all outdoor pursuits, the activities described in this publication may be 18 The Budawangs - where you dangerous. Undertaking them may result in loss, serious injury or death. can get lost in time The information in this publication is without any warranty on accuracy or completeness. There may be significant omissions and errors. People who are interested in walking in the areas Grose Valley concerned should make their own enquiries, and not rely fully on the A bushwalk in information in this publication. 24 The publisher, editor, authors or any Blue Mountains other entity or person will not be held responsible for any loss, injury, claim or liability of any kind resulting from people using information in this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Winter 2020
    FREE COVID-19 UPDATE Friends Respond to the Pandemic FRIENDS 2019 IN REVIEW MENTAL & PHYSICAL HEALTH EFFECTS OF WALKING WHAT HIKING TAUGHT ME ABOUT ISOLATION TERRY LAVENDER CHURCHILL FELLOWSHIP FRIENDS OF THE HEYSEN TRAIL | SOUTH AUSTRALIA | ISSUE 156 | WINTER 2020 BuildingBuilding friendships, friendships, confidence confidence & camaraderie& camaraderie amongamong women women as aswe we explore explore the the world world together. together. SMALLSMALL GROUP GROUP WALKS WALKS AND AND MORE MORE EXCLUSIVELYEXCLUSIVELY FOR FOR WOMEN WOMEN SINCESINCE 2008 2008 • Bibbulmun• Bibbulmun Track Track Sections Sections - WA - WA • Flinders• Flinders Ranges Ranges Walking Walking Holiday Holiday - SA - SA • Camino• Camino Pilgrimage Pilgrimage - Spain - Spain & Portugal & Portugal • Women’s• Women’s Outback Outback Camel Camel Trek Trek - SA - SA • Top• TopEnd EndExplorer: Explorer: Arnhem Arnhem Land, Land, Kakadu Kakadu & & LitchfieldLitchfield - NT - NT • Kangaroo• Kangaroo Island Island Walking Walking Tour Tour - SA - SA • Kilimanjaro• Kilimanjaro - Full - MoonFull Moon Summit Summit Trek Trek • Arthur• Arthur Wainwright’s Wainwright’s UK CoastUK Coast to Coast to Coast • Wild• Wild Untamed Untamed Borneo Borneo • Treasures• Treasures of Morocco of Morocco • Other• Other great great walks, walks, activities activities & adventures... & adventures... www.adventurouswomen.com.auwww.adventurouswomen.com.au [email protected]@adventurouswomen.com.au Ph: Ph:1300 1300 388 388419 419 L of FA f AL ME ALL o FAM H H E • • • • 2 2 6 6 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 7 7 2 2 CERTIFIC ATE of • • CERTIFIC ATE of • • 2 2 5 EXCELLENCE 0 5 EXCELLENCE 0 1 1 1 1 0 8 0 8 2 2 FriendsFriends of theof the Heysen Heysen Trail Trail members members receive receive a 10% a 10% discount discount F OF YOU NT R U N O E C X S I T D ‘ % W ’ E N 10 E E K M E N O D W E R R O F FOR ALL OUR UPCOMING WALKS, TRIPS AND EVENTS www.bigheartadventures.com.au Our office is currently closed temporarily due to COVID19.
    [Show full text]
  • M Last Visitor Management Strategy 3-5-05
    Visitor Management Strategy And Cultural Site Protection Strategy [Anangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara Lands] Contributors: Writer: Traditional Owners and Family Members Mike Last from all communities across the APY-Lands 21 st December 04 to including the Indigenous Land Managed Areas 31 st August 05 [Apara, Kalka-Pipalyatjara, Walalkara, Sandy’s Bore & Watarru] APY Land Management Staff and Field Colleagues Contents Outline 3 Introduction 5 Early Strategies 7 Traditional Strategies 10 Self Determination and Self Management Strategies 12 Pitjantjatjara Land Rights Strategies 15 Enterprise Strategies 19 Staff Employment Strategies 23 Summary of Strategies 25 Review of Strategies 28 Key Cultural Sites 30 Recommendations 33 Maps 34 Acknowledgements 35 References 36 Appendix I 37 Appendix II 39 Appendix III 42 Appendix IV 48 Appendix V 52 2 Outline Visitor management and the provision of site protection are not new concepts for Pitjantjantjara and Yankunytjatjara people. Hence this article is an attempt to examine the strategies that have been developed and used on the Anangu Pitjantjatjara Lands from traditional times until the present day. During this period it was found that as government policies and the social climate within Australia changed, more opportunities became available to improve strategies on the Lands. These improvements are only effective provided they are supported with sufficient resources including finance. Pitjantjantjara and Yankunytjatjara people (Anangu) are able to successfully manage visitors and protect cultural sites on their Lands providing they are fully supported by those who partner with them. The section on “Early Strategies” assesses those strategies developed after the establishment of western culture in Australia. “Traditional Strategies” briefly describes those used since Pitjantjatjara and Yankunytjatjara culture began.
    [Show full text]
  • A Needs-Based Review of the Status of Indigenous Languages in South Australia
    “KEEP THAT LANGUAGE GOING!” A Needs-Based Review of the Status of Indigenous Languages in South Australia A consultancy carried out by the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies for the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission, South Australia by Patrick McConvell, Rob Amery, Mary-Anne Gale, Christine Nicholls, Jonathan Nicholls, Lester Irabinna Rigney and Simone Ulalka Tur May 2002 Declaration The authors of this report wish to acknowledge that South Australia’s Indigenous communities remain the custodians for all of the Indigenous languages spoken across the length and breadth of this state. Despite enormous pressures and institutionalised opposition, Indigenous communities have refused to abandon their culture and languages. As a result, South Australia is not a storehouse for linguistic relics but remains the home of vital, living languages. The wisdom of South Australia’s Indigenous communities has been and continues to be foundational for all language programs and projects. In carrying out this project, the Research Team has been strengthened and encouraged by the commitment, insight and linguistic pride of South Australia’s Indigenous communities. All of the recommendations contained in this report are premised on the fundamental right of Indigenous Australians to speak, protect, strengthen and reclaim their traditional languages and to pass them on to future generations. * Within this report, the voices of Indigenous respondents appear in italics. In some places, these voices stand apart from the main body of the report, in other places, they are embedded within sentences. The decision to incorporate direct quotations or close paraphrases of Indigenous respondent’s view is recognition of the importance of foregrounding the perspectives and aspirations of Indigenous communities across the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Reflections on the Pitjantjatjara Outstation Movement Bill Edwards
    2 From Coombes to Coombs: Reflections on the Pitjantjatjara outstation movement Bill Edwards In September 1957, nearing the end of my studies at the University of Melbourne, I met the Reverend Victor Coombes, general secretary of the Presbyterian Board of Missions, to discuss the possibility of serving on a north Queensland Gulf mission. What motivated my interest in Aboriginal missions in an era when the more exotic overseas missions such as in the New Hebrides (Vanuatu) and Korea received more attention? Growing up in a very small country town in the Wimmera region of Victoria in the 1930s, I had little knowledge of Aboriginal people and their history. Monuments on nearby roads bearing the words ‘Major Mitchell passed by here’ suggested that this was the beginning of history. A rare meeting with an Aboriginal person was when a ‘swagman’ passed through my hometown of Lubeck. In return for the food my parents gave him, he cut firewood and gave my father an incised boomerang—now one of my prized possessions. My studies in arts, education and theology in Melbourne contributed nothing to my knowledge of Aboriginal culture and history. However, in 1954, I visited universities around Australia as a staff worker with a Christian student organisation, the Inter-Varsity Fellowship. A visit to Adelaide in March that year coincided with a visit by the Ernabella Mission Choir. They came to see 25 ExPERIMENTS IN SELF-Determination Queen Elizabeth II on her Australian tour. I heard them sing in the Teachers College and spent time with them at their accommodation, not imagining that four years later I would assume the role of conducting the choir.
    [Show full text]
  • EXPERIMENTS in SELF-DETERMINATION Histories of the Outstation Movement in Australia
    EXPERIMENTS IN SELF-DETERMINATION Histories of the outstation movement in Australia EXPERIMENTS IN SELF-DETERMINATION Histories of the outstation movement in Australia Edited by Nicolas Peterson and Fred Myers MONOGRAPHS IN ANTHROPOLOGY SERIES Published by ANU Press The Australian National University Acton ACT 2601, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at press.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: Experiments in self-determination : histories of the outstation movement in Australia / editors: Nicolas Peterson, Fred Myers. ISBN: 9781925022896 (paperback) 9781925022902 (ebook) Subjects: Community life. Community organization. Aboriginal Australians--Social conditions--20th century. Aboriginal Australians--Social life and customs--20th century. Other Creators/Contributors: Peterson, Nicolas, 1941- editor. Myers, Fred R., 1948- editor. Dewey Number: 305.89915 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design and layout by ANU Press This edition © 2016 ANU Press Contents List of maps . vii List of figures . ix List of tables . xi Preface and acknowledgements . xiii 1 . The origins and history of outstations as Aboriginal life projects . 1 Fred Myers and Nicolas Peterson History and memory 2 . From Coombes to Coombs: Reflections on the Pitjantjatjara outstation movement . 25 Bill Edwards 3 . Returning to country: The Docker River project . 47 Jeremy Long 4 . ‘Shifting’: The Western Arrernte’s outstation movement . 61 Diane Austin-Broos Western Desert complexities 5 . History, memory and the politics of self-determination at an early outstation .
    [Show full text]
  • Native Vegetation Council Rangelands Assessment
    Native Vegetation Council Rangelands Assessment Manual Native Vegetation Branch June 2017 Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution v4.0 (International Licence) www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ © Crown in right of the State of South Australia 2017 2 | NVC Rangelands Assessment Manual Contents 1 QUICK REFERENCE GUIDE 5 2 INTRODUCTION 6 2.1 How the method works 6 2.2 Background of the Rangelands Assessment 6 3 PRELIMINARY OFFICE PROCEDURE 7 4 FIELD PROCEDURE 12 4.1 Equipment 12 4.2 Determining locations of Sample Points in an application area (Block) 12 4.3 Completing the Rangelands Field Assessment 13 4.3.1 Background to the field assessment 13 4.3.2 Undertake the field assessment 13 4.3.3 Sample Point assessment details explained 17 5 FILLING IN THE RANGELANDS ASSESSMENT SCORESHEET 24 5.1 Landscape Context Scores 24 5.1.1 Number of landform features in Block 24 5.1.2 Size of the Block 25 5.1.3 Percentage (%) area protected in IBRA sub-region score 25 5.1.4 Prescence of a wetland, watercourse or lake score 25 5.2 Vegetation Condition Scores 25 5.2.1 Utilisation scores 26 5.2.2 Biotic and physical disturbance scores 27 5.2.3 Vegetation strata score 27 5.2.4 Introduced plant species cover score 27 5.3 Conservation Significance Scores 27 5.3.1 Conservation significance of ecological community score 28 5.3.2 Plant species of conservation significance 28 5.3.3 Fauna species of conservation significance 28 NVC Rangelands Assessment Manual | 3 5.4 Site Scores 29 5.4.1 Unit Biodiversity Score 29 5.4.2 Total Biodiversity Score 29 6 SUBMISSION OF DATASHEETS AND SCORESHEETS 30 6.1 Rangelands Assessment Site information and scores 30 6.2 Clearance application or regulation reports 30 7 INTERPRETATION OF RANGELANDS ASSESSMENT SCORES 31 7.1 Revisits to Rangelands Assessment Sites 31 8 REFERENCES 32 9 APPENDICES 33 Appendix A.
    [Show full text]
  • State of the Environment | South Australia | 2013
    State of the Environment South Australia Environment Protection Authority 2013 State of the Environment South Australia 2013 Environment Protection Authority © Environment Protection Authority This document may be reproduced in whole or part for the purpose of study or training subject to the inclusion of an acknowledgement of the source and to it not being used for commercial purposes or sale. Reproduction for purposes other than those given above requires the prior written permission of the Environment Protection Authority. For further information please contact: Environment Protection Authority GPO Box 2607 Adelaide SA 5001 Telephone (08) 8204 2000 Free call 1800 623 445 (country) Email: [email protected] Website: www.epa.sa.gov.au ISBN: 978-1-921495-46-5 This report is printed on recycled paper certified by the Forest Stewardship Council Australia Edited and designed by Biotext iii Foreword The Environment Protection Authority acknowledges state of the environment report, the Environment the responsibility entrusted to it by the parliament and Protection Authority is also releasing a plan to improve people of South Australia to periodically assess and report future state of the environment reporting. The plan on the condition of the state’s environment. We hope includes a recommendation for a whole-of-government that, in presenting this sixth state of the environment environmental information plan to fill important gaps in report for South Australia, we will continue to improve environmental knowledge, and to coordinate, integrate, understanding of the key environmental issues we face, better use and share the many sources of environmental and through greater knowledge, reduce the risks to a information available within and outside government.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Survey of Anangu Pitjantjatjara Lands
    Anangu Pitjantjatjara Lands Biological Survey RESULTS VEGETATION By P. J. Lang1, P. D. Canty1, B. J. Nesbitt2, L. M. Baker2 and A. C. Robinson1 INTRODUCTION Vegetation overview This chapter gives an introductory overview of The biogeography of the AP Lands is complex. The vegetation in the Anangu Pitjantjatjara Lands (AP range of landforms, soils and rock types, and Lands) and a brief review of previous botanical microclimates combine to provide the most diverse endeavour. This is followed by sections detailing expression of arid landscapes in South Australia. The various aspects of the flora, including new records and area, by virtue of its remoteness and lack of obvious accounts of species of particular significance. The next resources, has also remained relatively pristine, further section presents data collected by Baker and Nesbitt enhancing the biological importance of this region. integrating much of the Anangu traditional ecological The AP Lands include the tallest mountains in the knowledge provided during the survey. An analysis of State. The largest range complex, the Musgrave the quadrat-based vegetation data follows and the Ranges, has the highest mean annual rainfall (200 mm) resultant vegetation groups are described. in the Northern Arid Province (Laut et al. 1977). Altitude, aspect and drainage patterns associated with Only ‘public’ information was recorded from Anangu. these and other range systems in the region have a Prior to any survey information being collected, significant influence on vegetation, harbouring unique discussions were held with the Anangu survey plant communities, relict species and endemics. participants, to clarify what type of information was Depositional landforms surround the ranges and being sought and how it would be made available to the include extant and palaeo drainage systems.
    [Show full text]