DOCSLIB.ORG

Hydrogeological Review of the Musgrave Province, South Australia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hydrogeological Review of the Musgrave Province, South Australia Hydrogeological review of the Musgrave Province, South Australia Sunil Varma Goyder Institute for Water Research Technical Report Series No. 12/8 www.goyderinstitute.org Goyder Institute for Water Research Technical Report Series ISSN: 1839-2725 The Goyder Institute for Water Research is a partnership between the South Australian Government through the Department for Environment, Water and Natural Resources, CSIRO, Flinders University, the University of Adelaide and the University of South Australia. The Institute will enhance the South Australian Government’s capacity to develop and deliver science-based policy solutions in water management. It brings together the best scientists and researchers across Australia to provide expert and independent scientific advice to inform good government water policy and identify future threats and opportunities to water security. Enquires should be addressed to: Goyder Institute for Water Research Level 1, Torrens Building 220 Victoria Square, Adelaide, SA, 5000 tel: 08-8303 8952 e-mail: [email protected] Citation Varma, S., 2012, Hydrogeological review of the Musgrave Province, South Australia, Goyder Institute for Water Research Technical Report Series No. 12/8. Copyright © 2012 CSIRO To the extent permitted by law, all rights are reserved and no part of this publication covered by copyright may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means except with the written permission of CSIRO. Disclaimer The Participants advise that the information contained in this publication comprises general statements based on scientific research and does not warrant or represent the completeness of any information or material in this publication. CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................ v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...................................................................................................................................... vii 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Location ....................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Previous studies .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.4 Data collection ............................................................................................................................ 2 2 REGIONAL SETTING ............................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Topography and drainage ........................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Climate ........................................................................................................................................ 5 3 GEOLOGY ............................................................................................................................................... 8 4 HYDROGEOLOGY ................................................................................................................................... 9 4.1 Groundwater occurrence ............................................................................................................ 9 4.2 Recharge ................................................................................................................................... 11 4.3 Groundwater flow ..................................................................................................................... 12 4.4 Groundwater quality ................................................................................................................. 15 5 GROUNDWATER RESOURCES .............................................................................................................. 18 5.1 Groundwater use and future demand ...................................................................................... 18 5.2 Groundwater potential ............................................................................................................. 18 5.3 Climate change impacts on groundwater ................................................................................. 21 6 CONCLUSIONS ..................................................................................................................................... 25 7 RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................................................................................................... 26 REFERENCES...................................................................................................................................................... 27 GLOSSARY ......................................................................................................................................................... 29 Hydrogeological review of the Musgrave Province | iii Figures Figure 1: Location of the study area showing the Musgrave Province, aboriginal communities and road access. ................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Figure 2: Bore data availability in the Musgrave Province. ................................................................................ 4 Figure 3: Topography and drainage of the Musgrave Province. ........................................................................ 6 Figure 4: Musgrave Province rainfall (Source: SILO patch point data for Pukatja). ........................................... 7 Figure 5: Geology of the Musgrave Province (Major and Conor, 1993) ............................................................. 8 Figure 6: Surface map of the principal hydrogeological units of the Musgrave Province showing the overburden thickness (m) where available. Modified from the surface geology GIS data obtained from SARIG, South Australia. ..................................................................................................................................... 10 Figure 7: Palaeochannels of the northwestern part of South Australia (after Hou et al., 2007). The map also shows the present day drainage and the locations of hydrogeological sections PC1 and PC2, shown in Figures 8 and 9 respectively. ........................................................................................................................ 12 Figure 8: Hydrogeological sections near a palaeochannel (PC1) showing the channel sediments and the watertable. Section location is shown in Figure 7. ........................................................................................... 13 Figure 9: Hydrogeological sections near a palaeochannel (PC2) showing the channel sediments and the watertable. Section location is shown in Figure 7. ........................................................................................... 14 Figure 10: Regional watertable (RSWL) contours (m AHD) for the eastern Musgrave Province. Data density is shown as black dots. There is a lack of watertable elevation data in the western part. Groundwater flow is perpendicular to the contours. A watertable may not exist where basement outcrops occur unless they have laterally and vertically connected fractures that are saturated with groundwater. .................................................................................................................................................... 16 Figure 11: Groundwater salinity in the Musgrave Province, colour coded with respect to the aquifer intersected. The background map shows the surface of valley bottoms based on their topographic signature as flat low-lying areas based on MrVBF algorithm (Gallant and Dowling, 2003). ............................ 17 Figure 12: Schematic section showing typical successful groundwater bore locations (after Allen, 1996). ... 19 Figure 13: Total Magnetic Intensity (TMI) image of Musgrave Province (Gum and Conor, 2003). ................. 20 Figure 14: Water level trends in the aboriginal community bores - Amata, Indulkana, Kaltjiti and Kalka communities. The adjacent map shows the surface geology at the bores. The location of the community and the colour codes for the geology are shown in Figure 6. .......................................................................... 22 Figure 15: Water level trends in the aboriginal community bores - Mimli, Pipalyatjara, Pukatja, Yunyarinyi and Umuwa communities. The adjacent map shows the surface geology at the bores. The location of the community and the colour codes for the geology are shown in Figure 6. .............................. 23 Figure 16: Hydrographs of selected bores in the Musgrave Province showing minimal effect of annual rainfall the static water level (meters below natural surface). ........................................................................ 24 Tables Table 1: Summary of bore data in the Musgrave Province for each of the 1:250,000 map areas. ................... 9 Table 2: Bore data summary for each type of aquifer in the Musgrave Province. ............................................ 9 Hydrogeological review of the Musgrave Province
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Supplementary Budget Estimates 18-22 November 2013
    Financial Management Support Services Scoping Study Amata and Mimili September 2011 Financial Management Support Services Scoping Study for Amata and Mimili. Contents 1. Acknowledgements 3 2. Introduction 4 3. The Project 5 3.1 Limitations 6 4. Executive Summary 8 4.1 Recommendations 8 4.2 Recommendations to address serious risks to the 9 effectiveness of Financial Wellbeing Service in Amata and Mimili 5. The Communities 10 5.1 Amata 10 5.2 Mimili 11 6. Financial Wellbeing 13 6.1 Financial Wellbeing for Anangu 14 7. Financial literacy 19 8. Consultations and Participation 21 8.1 Highlighted observations 22 8.2 Common Findings 25 9. The Gap Analysis 27 9.1 Existing Financial Support Services 27 9.2 Current Services 28 9.3 Lessons Learned from Current service Providers 30 10. Considered models 32 10.1Proposed Service Delivery Model - Primary objectives 32 and outcomes of the service 10.2 Core Elements 33 10.2.1 Linkages with other providers 33 10.2.2Provider Capacity 35 10.2.3 Infrastructure Requirements 35 10.2.4 Staffing and Capacity 35 10.2.5 Locations 37 10.2.6 Accommodation 38 10.2.7 Service Delivery 38 BBM 2010/11:14 1 Financial Management Support Services Scoping Study for Amata and Mimili. Contents, continued 11. Measures of success 39 12. Communication Flows 40 13. Risks 41 14. Financial Education 46 Figures Figure 1 Map of APY Communities 13 Figure 2 Elements of Wellbeing 15 Figure 3 Amata Financial Wellbeing Centre – Staff 37 Figure 4 Mimili Financial Wellbeing Centre – Staff 37 Figure 5 Communication Flows 40 Appendices Appendix 1 An evaluation of a programme of financial education 48 provided by the Greater Easterhouse Money Advice Project Appendix 2 Family Income Management (FIM) – Cape York 50 Appendix 3 Amata and Mimili Profiles 52 Appendix 4 Substance Abuse Intelligence Desks 57 Appendix 5 Sample Job Description — Financial Counselor 58 Sample Job Description —Money management Worker 59 BBM 2010/11:14 2 Financial Management Support Services Scoping Study for Amata and Mimili.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a (PDF 85KB)
    A Appendix A: Committee visits to remote Aboriginal and Torres Strait communities As part of the Committee’s inquiry into remote Indigenous community stores the Committee visited seventeen communities, all of which had a distinctive culture, history and identity. The Committee began its community visits on 30 March 2009 travelling to the Torres Strait and the Cape York Peninsula in Queensland over four days. In late April the Committee visited communities in Central Australia over a three day period. Final consultations were held in Broome, Darwin and various remote regions in the Northern Territory including North West Arnhem Land. These visits took place in July over a five day period. At each location the Committee held a public meeting followed by an open forum. These meetings demonstrated to the Committee the importance of the store in remote community life. The Committee appreciated the generous hospitality and evidence provided to the Committee by traditional owners and elders, clans and families in all the remote Aboriginal and Torres Strait communities visited during the inquiry. The Committee would also like to thank everyone who assisted with the administrative organisation of the Committee’s community visits including ICC managers, Torres Strait Councils, Government Business Managers and many others within the communities. A brief synopsis of each community visit is set out below.1 1 Where population figures are given, these are taken from a range of sources including 2006 Census data and Grants Commission figures. 158 EVERYBODY’S BUSINESS Torres Strait Islands The Torres Strait Islands (TSI), traditionally called Zenadth Kes, comprise 274 small islands in an area of 48 000 square kilometres (kms), from the tip of Cape York north to Papua New Guinea and Indonesia.
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwater Recharge in the Eastern Anangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara Lands
    Groundwater recharge in the eastern Anangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara Lands DEWNR Technical report 2014/06 Groundwater recharge in the eastern Anangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara Lands Peter Kretschmer and Daniel Wohling Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources May, 2014 DEWNR Technical Report 2014/06 Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources GPO Box 1047, Adelaide SA 5001 Telephone National (08) 8463 6946 International +61 8 8463 6946 Fax National (08) 8463 6999 International +61 8 8463 6999 Website http://www.environment.sa.gov.au Disclaimer The Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources and its employees do not warrant or make any representation regarding the use, or results of the use, of the information contained herein as regards to its correctness, accuracy, reliability, currency or otherwise. The Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources and its employees expressly disclaims all liability or responsibility to any person using the information or advice. Information contained in this document is correct at the time of writing. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. © Crown in right of the State of South Australia, through the Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources 2014 ISBN 978-1-922174-78-9 Preferred way to cite this publication Kretschmer, P., Wohling, D., 2014, Groundwater recharge in the Anangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara Lands, South Australia, DEWNR Technical Report 2014/06, Government of South Australia, through the Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, Adelaide Download this document at: http://www.waterconnect.sa.gov.au DEWNR Technical Report 2014/06 i Foreword The Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources (DEWNR) is responsible for the management of the State’s natural resources, ranging from policy leadership to on-ground delivery in consultation with government, industry and communities.
    [Show full text]
  • A Typology of the Traditional Games of Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples
    A Typology of the Traditional Games of Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples Ken Edwards Author Ken Edwards has studied health and physical education, environmental science and sports history. He has taught health and physical education at both primary and secondary school level and has been a Head of Health and Physical Education at various schools. Ken completed a Ph.D. through UQ and has been an academic at QUT and Bond University and is now an Associate Professor in Sport, Health and Physical Education at USQ (Springfield Campus). Ken has had involvement in many sports as a player, coach and administrator. Wener ganbony tilletkerrin? What shall we play (at) first (Language of the Western people of Victoria) A Typology of the Traditional Games of Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples Ken Edwards Artwork by Aboriginal artist Maxine Zealey (of the Gureng Gureng people in Queensland). Copyright © 2012 by Ken Edwards. All rights are reserved. No portion of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any means without the written permission of the Copyright owner. ISBN 978-0-9872359-0-9 Paper size: 16.5cms X 23 cms Page printing for ebook: Scale to fit A4 Acknowledgements Great excitement existed amongst the players in this game, which was begun in this manner: each player had one of these toys in his hands, standing at a mark on the ground some 30 yards or 40 yards from the disc. The thrower standing on the mark would measure the distance with his eye, and turning round would walk some few yards to the rear, and suddenly turning to the front would run back to the mark, discharging his weitweit with great force at the disc.
    [Show full text]
  • A Personal Journey with Anangu History and Politics
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Flinders Academic Commons FJHP – Volume 27 ‐2011 A Personal Journey with Anangu History and Politics Bill Edwards Introduction Fifty years ago, in September 1961, I sat in the shade of a mulga tree near the Officer Creek, a usually dry watercourse which rises in the Musgrave Ranges in the far north- west of South Australia and peters out in the sandhill country to the south. I was observing work being done to supply infrastructure for a new settlement for Pitjantjatjara/Yankunytjatjara Aboriginal people. That settlement, which opened in the following month of October, is Fregon, an Aboriginal community which together with other Pitjantjatjara/Yankunytjatjara communities featured in newspaper and radio news reports in September 2011. These reports referred to overcrowding in houses, the lack of adequate furnishings, poverty and, in the case of Fregon, children starving. Later comments by people on the ground suggested that the reports of starvation were exaggerated.1 When I returned to my home at Ernabella Mission, 60 kilometres north-east of Fregon, in 1961, I recorded my observations and forwarded them to The Advertiser in Adelaide. They were published as a feature article on Saturday 23 September, 1961 under the heading ‘Cattle Station for “Old Australians”’.2 As I read and listened to the recent reports I was concerned at the limited understanding of the history and the effects of policy changes in the region. As a letter I wrote to The Advertiser, referring back to my earlier article, was not published, I expanded it into an article and sent it to Nicolas Rothwell, the Northern Territory correspondent for The Australian, seeking his advice as to where I might submit it.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Participation in Australian Economies II Map 5.1 the APY Landsmap 5.1 Lea Et Al
    5. ‘Always Anangu—always enterprising’ Alan O’Connor As a result of primary research in Arnhem Land, Altman developed a hybrid economy model for Indigenous Australians living in remote areas in which people move between the state, market and customary sectors (Altman 2005). He asserts that development policies for remote areas based on the state and the market have failed because of the existence of a customary sector and very different intercultural value systems. In addition, he suggests the commercial marginality of Aboriginal-owned land is the reason it was alienated, and as a result the potential to increase the market sector is very limited (Altman 2005). In this chapter, I examine Anangu involvement in economic life until the mid- 1970s with a particular focus on Ernabella and its homelands, and explore elements of the hybrid economy on the Anangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara (APY) Lands. This work is part of my thesis, developed from a larger study of enterprise development on the lands resulting from an Australian Research Council grant in 2007 obtained by Banerjee and Tedmanson. The research was conducted through the University of South Australia. The research partners in this work were from the communities of Ernabella, Turkey Bore and the Anilalya Homelands as well as UnitingCare Wesley Adelaide. Geography, Climate and Traditional Food Sources The APY Lands are located in the far north-west of South Australia and make up 102 500 sq km or 10.4 per cent of the area of South Australia. Ernabella is the largest community on the lands (with a population that has varied about 450 for many years) and is approximately 440 km by road from both Alice Springs and Coober Pedy.
    [Show full text]
  • G-FLOWS Stage 3: Hydrogeological Conceptual Understanding of the APY Lands Groundwater System Including the Lindsay East Palaeovalley
    G-FLOWS Stage 3: Hydrogeological conceptual understanding of the Anangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara (APY) Lands groundwater system including the Lindsay East Palaeovalley Andrew Love, Adrian Costar, Carmen Krapf, Yueqing Xie, Ilka Wallis, Tessa Lane, Mark Keppel, Kent Inverarity, Zijiuan Deng, Tim Munday and Neville Robinson Goyder Institute for Water Research Technical Report Series No. 20/06 www.goyderinstitute.org Goyder Institute for Water Research Technical Report Series ISSN: 1839-2725 The Goyder Institute for Water Research is a partnership between the South Australian Government through the Department for Environment and Water, CSIRO, Flinders University, the University of Adelaide, and the University of South Australia. The Institute enhances the South Australian Government’s capacity to develop and deliver science-based policy solutions in water management. It brings together the best scientists and researchers across Australia to provide expert and independent scientific advice to inform good government water policy and identify future threats and opportunities to water security. The following Associate organisations contributed to this report: Enquires should be addressed to: Goyder Institute for Water Research Level 4, Rundle Mall Plaza, 50 Rundle Mall, Adelaide, SA 5000 tel: 08 8313 5020 e-mail: [email protected] Citation Love A., Costar A., Krapf C., Xie Y., Wallis I., Lane T., Keppel M., Inverarity K., Deng Z., Munday T. and Robinson N. (2020) G-FLOWS Stage 3: Hydrogeological conceptual understanding of the APY Lands groundwater system including the Lindsay East Palaeovalley. Goyder Institute for Water Research Technical Report Series No. 20/06. Copyright © Crown in right of the State of South Australia, Department for Environment and Water.
    [Show full text]
  • Warru Recovery Plan
    Warru Recovery Plan Recovery of Petrogale lateralis MacDonnell Ranges race in South Australia | 2010–2020 An initiative of the Federal government, Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Alinytjara Wilurara Natural Resources Management Board, Anangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara, Conservation Ark and Ecological Horizons. ECOLOGICAL HORIZONS www.environment.sa.gov.auwww.environment.sa.gov.au Minister’s foreword Warru have contracted dramatically in range and abundance over the past 80 years and are now considered one of South Australia’s most endangered mammal species. The Warru Recovery Plan outlines the opportunity to fulfill the vision of the Warru Recovery Team (WRT) and its stakeholders of reversing this decline and restoring warru to their former range where their Tjukurpa (dreaming) can continue to develop. The Warru Recovery Plan sets out a range of actions and measurable targets which aim not only to increase the distribution and abundance of warru across South Australia, but to produce positive landscape environmental change across the A angu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara Lands. Central to the Warru Recovery Plan are two important themes: a. Warru conservation will continue to provide training and employment opportunities for A angu, as well as strong connections to historical and contemporary Tjukurpa. b. The management, research and initiatives described in the Warru Recovery Plan will produce positive landscape environmental change across the APY Lands. We strongly believe that adoption and implementation of the
    [Show full text]
  • M Last Visitor Management Strategy 3-5-05
    Visitor Management Strategy And Cultural Site Protection Strategy [Anangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara Lands] Contributors: Writer: Traditional Owners and Family Members Mike Last from all communities across the APY-Lands 21 st December 04 to including the Indigenous Land Managed Areas 31 st August 05 [Apara, Kalka-Pipalyatjara, Walalkara, Sandy’s Bore & Watarru] APY Land Management Staff and Field Colleagues Contents Outline 3 Introduction 5 Early Strategies 7 Traditional Strategies 10 Self Determination and Self Management Strategies 12 Pitjantjatjara Land Rights Strategies 15 Enterprise Strategies 19 Staff Employment Strategies 23 Summary of Strategies 25 Review of Strategies 28 Key Cultural Sites 30 Recommendations 33 Maps 34 Acknowledgements 35 References 36 Appendix I 37 Appendix II 39 Appendix III 42 Appendix IV 48 Appendix V 52 2 Outline Visitor management and the provision of site protection are not new concepts for Pitjantjantjara and Yankunytjatjara people. Hence this article is an attempt to examine the strategies that have been developed and used on the Anangu Pitjantjatjara Lands from traditional times until the present day. During this period it was found that as government policies and the social climate within Australia changed, more opportunities became available to improve strategies on the Lands. These improvements are only effective provided they are supported with sufficient resources including finance. Pitjantjantjara and Yankunytjatjara people (Anangu) are able to successfully manage visitors and protect cultural sites on their Lands providing they are fully supported by those who partner with them. The section on “Early Strategies” assesses those strategies developed after the establishment of western culture in Australia. “Traditional Strategies” briefly describes those used since Pitjantjatjara and Yankunytjatjara culture began.
    [Show full text]
  • A Needs-Based Review of the Status of Indigenous Languages in South Australia
    “KEEP THAT LANGUAGE GOING!” A Needs-Based Review of the Status of Indigenous Languages in South Australia A consultancy carried out by the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies for the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission, South Australia by Patrick McConvell, Rob Amery, Mary-Anne Gale, Christine Nicholls, Jonathan Nicholls, Lester Irabinna Rigney and Simone Ulalka Tur May 2002 Declaration The authors of this report wish to acknowledge that South Australia’s Indigenous communities remain the custodians for all of the Indigenous languages spoken across the length and breadth of this state. Despite enormous pressures and institutionalised opposition, Indigenous communities have refused to abandon their culture and languages. As a result, South Australia is not a storehouse for linguistic relics but remains the home of vital, living languages. The wisdom of South Australia’s Indigenous communities has been and continues to be foundational for all language programs and projects. In carrying out this project, the Research Team has been strengthened and encouraged by the commitment, insight and linguistic pride of South Australia’s Indigenous communities. All of the recommendations contained in this report are premised on the fundamental right of Indigenous Australians to speak, protect, strengthen and reclaim their traditional languages and to pass them on to future generations. * Within this report, the voices of Indigenous respondents appear in italics. In some places, these voices stand apart from the main body of the report, in other places, they are embedded within sentences. The decision to incorporate direct quotations or close paraphrases of Indigenous respondent’s view is recognition of the importance of foregrounding the perspectives and aspirations of Indigenous communities across the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Participation in Australian Economies
    Indigenous Participation in Australian Economies Historical and anthropological perspectives Indigenous Participation in Australian Economies Historical and anthropological perspectives Edited by Ian Keen THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY E P R E S S E P R E S S Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at: http://epress.anu.edu.au/ip_citation.html National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: Indigenous participation in Australian economies : historical and anthropological perspectives / edited by Ian Keen. ISBN: 9781921666865 (pbk.) 9781921666872 (ebook) Notes: Includes bibliographical references. Subjects: Aboriginal Australians--Economic conditions. Business enterprises, Aboriginal Australian. Aboriginal Australians--Employment. Economic anthropology--Australia. Hunting and gathering societies--Australia. Australia--Economic conditions. Other Authors/Contributors: Keen, Ian. Dewey Number: 306.30994 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design and layout by ANU E Press Cover image: Camel ride at Karunjie Station ca. 1950, with Jack Campbell in hat. Courtesy State Library of Western Australia image number 007846D. Printed by Griffin Press This edition © 2010 ANU E Press Contents Acknowledgements. .vii List.of.figures. ix Contributors. xi 1 ..Introduction. 1 Ian Keen 2 ..The.emergence.of.Australian.settler.capitalism.in.the.. nineteenth.century.and.the.disintegration/integration.of.. Aboriginal.societies:.hybridisation.and.local.evolution.. within.the.world.market. 23 Christopher Lloyd 3 ..The.interpretation.of.Aboriginal.‘property’.on.the.
    [Show full text]
  • 2007 2008 Annual Report
    Anangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara A.B.N. 77 261 612 162 PMB 227 Umuwa via Alice Springs NT 0872 Phone: (08) 8954 8111 Fax: (08) 8954 8110 Email: [email protected] Annual Report 2007 - 2008 Warru Women, Anangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara Lands, 2008 A body corporate constituted by the Anangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara Land Rights Act 1981 (SA) 2 Anangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara A.B.N. 77 261 612 162 PMB 227 Umuwa via Alice Springs NT 0872 Phone: (08) 8954 8132 Fax: (08) 8954 8110 Email: [email protected] A Message from the Chairperson Once again, I have pleasure in providing the 2007/2008 Annual Report of Anangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara. It was another hectic year for Anangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara that had its high points and low points for me. This Annual Report is required under the Anangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara Land Rights Act to report on the activities of the Executive Board. However, as with last year, I consider people like to know more about how APY operates. This report provides a summary of all the relevant events from APY’s various Departments. Much of the year was occupied with significant dealings with the Government in relation to a $25 million Housing offer that was conditional upon entering leases. At the time of reporting, these events were still on-going but we were getting close on agreement. The Mintabie Lease was still not finalised during the year. This was disappointing but we continue to work with Anangu and the Government to come up with a lease that will satisfy the wishes of our members.
    [Show full text]