DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 82, No. 243/Wednesday, December 20

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Register/Vol. 82, No. 243/Wednesday, December 20 60350 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 20, 2017 / Proposed Rules specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 418–0432. For detailed instructions for Order. First, we seek further comment FR 67249, November 9, 2000). submitting comments and additional on issues related to exceptions to and information on the rulemaking process, waivers of the local simulcasting List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 see the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION requirement. Second, we seek comment Environmental protection, Air section of this document. on whether we should let full power pollution control, Incorporation by FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For broadcasters use channels in the reference, Intergovernmental relations, additional information, contact Evan television broadcast band that are Volatile organic compounds, Particulate Baranoff, [email protected], of the vacant to facilitate the transition to 3.0. matter. Media Bureau, Policy Division, (202) Finally, we tentatively conclude that Dated: December 5, 2017. 418–7142, or Matthew Hussey, local simulcasting should not change Alexis Strauss, [email protected], of the Office the significantly viewed status of a Next Gen TV station. Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX. of Engineering and Technology, (202) [FR Doc. 2017–27432 Filed 12–19–17; 8:45 am] 418–3619. Direct press inquiries to B. Discussion BILLING CODE 6560–50–P Janice Wise at (202) 418–8165. For additional information concerning the 1. Local Simulcasting Waivers and Paperwork Reduction Act information Exceptions FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS collection requirements contained in 2. Simulcast Waivers. In the Report COMMISSION this document, send an email to PRA@ and Order, we explain that we will fcc.gov or contact Cathy Williams at consider requests for waiver of our local 47 CFR Parts 15, 73, 74 and 76 (202) 418–2918. simulcasting requirement on a case-by- SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a case basis, including (1) requests [GN Docket No. 16–142; FCC 17–158] summary of the Commission’s Further seeking to transition directly from 1.0 to 3.0 service on the station’s existing Authorizing Permissive Use of the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking facility without simulcasting in 1.0 and ‘‘Next Generation’’ Broadcast (FNPRM), FCC 17–158, adopted on (2) requests to air a 1.0 simulcast Television Standard November 16, 2017 and released on November 20, 2017. The full text of this channel from a host location that does AGENCY: Federal Communications document is available electronically via not cover all or a portion of the station’s Commission. the FCC’s Electronic Document community of license or from which the ACTION: Proposed rule. Management System (EDOCS) website station can provide only a lower signal at http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/ threshold over the community than that SUMMARY: In this document, we seek or via the FCC’s Electronic Comment required by the rules.1 With respect to further comment on issues related to Filing System (ECFS) website at http:// such requests, we state: ‘‘We are exceptions to and waivers of the local fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs2/. (Documents will inclined to consider favorably requests simulcasting requirement, whether we be available electronically in ASCII, for waiver of our local simulcasting should let full power broadcasters use Microsoft Word, and/or Adobe Acrobat.) requirement where the Next Gen TV channels in the television broadcast This document is also available for station can demonstrate that it has no band that are vacant to facilitate the public inspection and copying during viable local simulcasting partner in its transition to 3.0, and finally, we regular business hours in the FCC market and where the station agrees to tentatively conclude that local Reference Information Center, which is make reasonable efforts to preserve 1.0 simulcasting should not change the located in Room CY–A257 at FCC service to existing viewers in its significantly viewed status of a Next Headquarters, 445 12th Street SW, community of license and/or otherwise Gen TV station. Washington, DC 20554. The Reference minimize the impact on such viewers DATES: Comments are due on or before Information Center is open to the public (for example, by providing free or low February 20, 2018; reply comments are Monday through Thursday from 8:00 cost ATSC 3.0 converters to viewers).’’ due on or before March 20, 2018. a.m. to 4:30 p.m. and Friday from 8:00 3. We seek comment on what further ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, a.m. to 11:30 a.m. The complete text guidance we should provide about the identified by GN Docket No. 16–142, by may be purchased from the circumstances in which we will grant a any of the following methods: Commission’s copy contractor, 445 12th waiver of the local simulcasting • Federal Communications Street SW, Room CY–B402, Washington, requirement. How should we determine Commission’s website: http:// DC 20554. Alternative formats are if a station has a ‘‘viable’’ simulcast www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/. Follow the available for people with disabilities partner? Given that we specify in the instructions for submitting comments. (Braille, large print, electronic files, Report and Order that a Next Gen TV • Mail: Filings can be sent by hand or audio format), by sending an email to broadcaster’s 1.0 simulcast channel messenger delivery, by commercial [email protected] or calling the must continue to cover its entire overnight courier, or by first-class or Commission’s Consumer and community of license, should we overnight U.S. Postal Service mail Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) consider a station to have no viable (although the Commission continues to 418–0530 (voice), (202) 418–0432 partner only if there is no potential experience delays in receiving U.S. (TTY). simulcasting partner in the same DMA Postal Service mail). All filings must be that can cover the station’s entire addressed to the Commission’s Synopsis community of license? Alternatively, Secretary, Office of the Secretary, I. Further Notice of Proposed should we consider adopting a broader Federal Communications Commission. Rulemaking definition of viability? For example, • People With Disabilities: Contact should we specify that waiver the FCC to request reasonable A. Introduction accommodations (accessible format 1. In this Further Notice of Proposed 1 The Commission may waive its rules if good cause is shown. See 47 CFR 1.3. We explain in the documents, sign language interpreters, Rulemaking, we seek further comment Report and Order that we are not inclined to CART, etc.) by email: [email protected] on three topics related to the rules consider favorably requests to change community of or phone: (202) 418–0530 or TTY: (202) adopted in the companion Report and license solely to enable simulcasting. VerDate Sep<11>2014 22:03 Dec 19, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\20DEP1.SGM 20DEP1 ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 20, 2017 / Proposed Rules 60351 applicants located in DMAs in which minimize disruption to consumers that channel to which a displaced LPTV or there are fewer than a threshold number we should consider or require? We also translator station could relocate. The of full power and/or Class A or LPTV invite comment on other circumstances LPTV Spectrum Rights Coalition broadcasters will be considered to have in which we should consider granting opposes ONE Media’s proposal on the no viable partner? If so, what threshold waivers of the local simulcasting ground that it would diminish LPTV should we adopt? How should we requirement. licensing rights in the middle of the consider cases in which there are no 5. Simulcast Exceptions. We also seek displacement process. The Wi-Fi stations that can cover a station’s comment on whether to exempt NCE Alliance, Microsoft, the Consumers community of license, and therefore and/or Class A stations as a class from Union et al., and Dynamic Spectrum serve as an ATSC 1.0 simulcast host our local simulcasting requirement or Alliance also oppose any approach that under our rules, but there are stations in adopt a presumptive waiver standard for would expand broadcasters’ spectrum the DMA that are transitioning to ATSC such stations. In the Report and Order, rights in conjunction with ATSC 3.0 3.0 and therefore could potentially serve we exempt LPTV and TV translator deployment, and they express concern as a 3.0 lighthouse? If there is a stations from our local simulcasting about damaging the potential success of potential partner in the same DMA, are requirement and allow these stations to white space use in the television bands. there other circumstances that would transition directly to 3.0 service. Class A 7. Given the diversity of comments on make such potential partner not viable, and NCE stations could also face more this issue, we seek additional comment such as, for example, if the potential difficulty than commercial full power on the extent to which we should allow partner refused to agree to being a stations face when seeking a local full power broadcasters to use vacant simulcasting partner? Should we have simulcasting partner. Could allowing channels in the television broadcast different levels of scrutiny for waiver Class A and NCE stations to transition band to facilitate the transition to 3.0, requests depending on whether the directly to 3.0 make them more and, if so, when they should be able to petition seeks to transition directly as attractive ‘‘lighthouse’’ candidates? We use these channels, and what opposed to simulcast from a facility that seek comment on whether, as a general procedures we should use to authorize will not cover its community of license? matter, allowing NCE and Class A that use.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Digital Television and the Allure of Auctions: the Birth and Stillbirth of DTV Legislation
    Federal Communications Law Journal Volume 49 Issue 3 Article 2 4-1997 Digital Television and the Allure of Auctions: The Birth and Stillbirth of DTV Legislation Ellen P. Goodman Covington & Burling Follow this and additional works at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/fclj Part of the Communications Law Commons, and the Legislation Commons Recommended Citation Goodman, Ellen P. (1997) "Digital Television and the Allure of Auctions: The Birth and Stillbirth of DTV Legislation," Federal Communications Law Journal: Vol. 49 : Iss. 3 , Article 2. Available at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/fclj/vol49/iss3/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School Journals at Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Federal Communications Law Journal by an authorized editor of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Digital Television and the Allure of Auctions: The Birth and Stillbirth of DTV Legislation Ellen P. Goodman* I. INTRODUCTION ................................... 517 II. ORIGINS OF THE DTV PRovIsIoNs OF THE 1996 ACT .... 519 A. The Regulatory Process ..................... 519 B. The FirstBills ............................ 525 1. The Commerce Committee Bills ............. 526 2. Budget Actions ......................... 533 C. The Passage of the 1996Act .................. 537 Ill. THE AFTERMATH OF THE 1996 ACT ................ 538 A. Setting the Stage .......................... 538 B. The CongressionalHearings .................. 542 IV. CONCLUSION ................................ 546 I. INTRODUCTION President Clinton signed into law the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (1996 Act or the Act) on February 8, 1996.1 The pen he used to sign the Act was also used by President Eisenhower to create the federal highway system in 1957 and was later given to Senator Albert Gore, Sr., the father of the highway legislation.
    [Show full text]
  • Channels Near to CNBC Increases Viewership By
    REDACTED FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION channels near to CNBC increases viewership by [[_]]9 When neighborhooded with CNBC, the hours BTV is watched per week increases [[_JJ, relative to average hours watched. 10 In fact, when BTV was simulcast in the morning by the USA Network from 2001-2003, which was prior to NBC's acquisition of USA Network, at which time carriage of BTV was dropped, BTV occasionally outdrew CNBC during the critical early morning "prime time" hours. II Similarly, BTV has significantly higher viewership when it is carried on cable systems in non-U.S. markets where its channel is neighborhooded with CNBC and similar news programming. [[ support its wide international viewership, Bloomberg TV broadcasts through Bloomberg Asia, Bloomberg Europe, and Bloomberg USA. I3 News bureaus in London, Hong Kong, and Beijing - to name only a few - broadcast internationally at varying times throughout the day. These international programs enjoy widespread success. Bloomberg has received numerous awards for BTV. 14 9 See Exhibit 3, Dr. Leslie M. Marx, Professor of Economics, Duke University and former Chief Economist, Federal Communications Commission, Economic Report on the Proposed Comcast­ NBC Universal Transaction at Appendix at 23 ("Marx Report"). to Marx Report Appendix at 23. II USA Weekly Report Spreadsheet. 12 [[ JJ 13 Bloomberg Television, http://www.bloomberg.com/medialtv/ (last visited June 4,2010). 14 Bloomberg Television, About Bloomberg, News Awards, http://about.bloomberg.com/news_awards.html (last visited June 4, 2010). 7 5103307.02 REDACffiD FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION II. BLOOMBERG HAS STANDING TO PETITION TO DENY THE APPLICATION Bloomberg has standing to petition the Commission to deny the Application in the 15 Comcast-NBCU merger as a party in interest in that it has both "competitor" standing16 and "listener" standing.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Communications Commission § 74.631
    Pt. 74 47 CFR Ch. I (10–1–20 Edition) RULES APPLY TO ALL SERVICES, AM, FM, AND RULES APPLY TO ALL SERVICES, AM, FM, AND TV, UNLESS INDICATED AS PERTAINING TO A TV, UNLESS INDICATED AS PERTAINING TO A SPECIFIC SERVICE—Continued SPECIFIC SERVICE—Continued [Policies of FCC are indicated (*)] [Policies of FCC are indicated (*)] Tender offers and proxy statements .... 73.4266(*) U.S./Mexican Agreement ..................... 73.3570 Territorial exclusivily in non-network 73.658 USA-Mexico FM Broadcast Agree- 73.504 program arrangements; Affiliation ment, Channel assignments under agreements and network program (NCE-FM). practices (TV). Unlimited time ...................................... 73.1710 Territorial exclusivity, (Network)— Unreserved channels, Noncommercial 73.513 AM .......................................... 73.132 educational broadcast stations oper- FM .......................................... 73.232 ating on (NCE-FM). TV .......................................... 73.658 Use of channels, Restrictions on (FM) 73.220 Test authorization, Special field ........... 73.1515 Use of common antenna site— Test stations, Portable ......................... 73.1530 FM .......................................... 73.239 Testing antenna during daytime (AM) 73.157 TV .......................................... 73.635 Tests and maintenance, Operation for 73.1520 Use of multiplex subcarriers— Tests of equipment .............................. 73.1610 FM .......................................... 73.293 Tests, Program ....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Communications Commission FCC 19-67 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 in the Matter Of
    Federal Communications Commission FCC 19-67 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Children’s Television Programming Rules ) MB Docket No. 18-202 ) Modernization of Media Regulation Initiative ) MB Docket No. 17-105 REPORT AND ORDER AND FURTHER NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING Adopted: July 10, 2019 Released: July 12, 2019 Comment Date: (30 days after date of publication in the Federal Register) Reply Comment Date: (60 days after date of publication in the Federal Register) By the Commission: Chairman Pai and Commissioners O’Rielly and Carr issuing separate statements; Commissioners Rosenworcel and Starks dissenting and issuing separate statements. TABLE OF CONTENTS Heading Paragraph # I. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................1 II. BACKGROUND.....................................................................................................................................3 III. DISCUSSION........................................................................................................................................10 A. Statutory Authority .........................................................................................................................10 B. The Current State of the Marketplace for Children’s Programming ..............................................11 C. Core Programming..........................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Enhanced TV Features on National Broadcast and Cable Program Web Sites: An
    Enhanced TV Features on National Broadcast and Cable Program Web sites: An Exploratory Analysis of What Features are Present and How Viewers Respond to Them A thesis presented to the faculty of the Scripps College of Communication of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science Jasmin M. Goodman August 2009 © 2009 Jasmin M. Goodman. All Rights Reserved. This thesis titled Enhanced TV Features on National Broadcast and Cable Program Web sites: An Exploratory Analysis of What Features are Present and How Viewers Respond to Them by JASMIN M. GOODMAN has been approved for the E. W. Scripps School of Journalism and the Scripps College of Communication by Mary T. Rogus Associate Professor of Journalism Gregory J. Shepherd Dean, Scripps College of Communication ii ABSTRACT GOODMAN, JASMIN M., M.S., August 2009, Journalism Enhanced TV Features on National Broadcast and Cable Program Web sites: An Exploratory Analysis of What Features are Present and How Viewers Respond to Them (84 pp.) Director of Thesis: Mary T. Rogus This study explores the presence of enhanced features on national TV program Web sites, and viewer response and reaction to these features. Using content analysis and focus group methods, it was discovered that fan-based features invoked a more positive response than any other feature category. The results also revealed participant motivations for visiting TV program sites. Approved: _____________________________________________________________ Mary T. Rogus Associate Professor of Journalism iii DEDICATION Lena Neal Edwards “Granny” 1930-1995 Lillie Mae Grant “Grandma Lillie” 1911-2008 Bobbie Coleman “Grandma Bob” 1937-2008 And finally to the best Granddaddy in the world, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Program and System Information Protocol Implementation Guidelines for Broadcasters
    ATSC Recommended Practice: Program and System Information Protocol Implementation Guidelines for Broadcasters Document A/69:2009, 25 December 2009 Advanced Television Systems Committee, Inc. 1776 K Street, N.W., Suite 200 Washington, D.C. 20006 Advanced Television Systems Committee Document A/69:2009 The Advanced Television Systems Committee, Inc., is an international, non-profit organization developing voluntary standards for digital television. The ATSC member organizations represent the broadcast, broadcast equipment, motion picture, consumer electronics, computer, cable, satellite, and semiconductor industries. Specifically, ATSC is working to coordinate television standards among different communications media focusing on digital television, interactive systems, and broadband multimedia communications. ATSC is also developing digital television implementation strategies and presenting educational seminars on the ATSC standards. ATSC was formed in 1982 by the member organizations of the Joint Committee on InterSociety Coordination (JCIC): the Electronic Industries Association (EIA), the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE), the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB), the National Cable Telecommunications Association (NCTA), and the Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE). Currently, there are approximately 140 members representing the broadcast, broadcast equipment, motion picture, consumer electronics, computer, cable, satellite, and semiconductor industries. ATSC Digital TV Standards include
    [Show full text]
  • Faq's Digital Pass
    Hosting a Lifeway Simulcast What is a Simulcast? A Simple Answer — a simulcast is a live internet broadcast of an event from a single venue into multiple venues – such as your own environment. Thus a simultaneous event occurs in both the origin venue and in many satellite locations — your church, home or laptop! What do I need to host a Simulcast? In order to host a simulcast you need to make sure you have the following: • An Internet Connection • A desktop or laptop computer • A mobile phone or tablet Internet Connection Your Internet connection should be one of the following: • DSL — service is faster than dial up and runs through your phone line • Broadband or Cable Modem — this is a dedicated line from your cable service What is the minimum connection speed that you recommend? We recommend that the minimum connection be 700kbps (1MB for good quality; 2.5mpbs for best quality) download speed. You may test your connection’s speed by going to http://www.speedtest.net. If your download speed is less than the suggested minimum, then you have the following options: • Connect at the lowest speed we broadcast with (500k) and understand that the quality of the stream may be a bit less than you are used to. • Contact your Internet Service Provider (ISP) and request a faster connection. In some cases, your current service provider may offer a higher rate of speed for the same rate you are already playing. Computer These are the suggested requirements for your PC or Mac for a successful webcast: Software Requirements: Browsers We recommend a “neutral” browser, or one that doesn’t depend on the operating system of your computer.
    [Show full text]
  • The Radio 1 Breakfast Show with Nick Grimshaw Industries
    AS and A LEVEL MEDIA STUDIES Factsheet Industries and audiences factsheet: The Radio 1 Breakfast Show with Nick Grimshaw Industries Production and distribution • The Radio 1 Breakfast Show with Nick Grimshaw is broadcast weekdays from 06.30-10.00 am. • The Breakfast Show has been running since 1967, but Nick Grimshaw took over as the 15th presenter in 2012. • BBC Radio 1 is broadcast on FM, DAB, Freeview, Freesat, Virgin, Sky, or online via BBC Radio Player (including via the phone or tablet app) where it can be heard live or streamed for 30 days. • It is produced by the BBC from its own studios at Broadcasting House in London. • There’s a useful BBC Academy podcast (with transcript) about how the programme is produced http://www.bbc. co.uk/academy/articles/art20170619095219011 • You can also hear what one of the producers (Fiona Hanlon) thinks when she talks about what it’s like to work on the programme: https://www.shu.ac.uk/learn-more/radio-1- breakfast-show • The music is largely playlisted – what is going to be played on daytime Radio 1 is decided by a committee; they choose around 40 records each week for repeated daytime play (A-list records get 25 plays a week, B-list 15, and C-list eight to 10). It’s explained here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/ programmes/articles/SYYQz3WNpBJFs6MrRcs0B5/how-do-i- get-my-music-played-on-radio-1 . Choices are partly guided by what’s already popular with young people online; many older artists are not included as the network is trying to keep an under-30 audience.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Communications Commission FCC 14-141 Before the Federal
    Federal Communications Commission FCC 14-141 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Sports Blackout Rules ) MB Docket No. 12-3 ) REPORT AND ORDER Adopted: September 30, 2014 Released: September 30, 2014 By the Commission: Chairman Wheeler and Commissioners Clyburn, Rosenworcel, Pai and O’Rielly issuing separate statements. TABLE OF CONTENTS Heading Paragraph # I. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................. 1 II. BACKGROUND.................................................................................................................................... 3 III. DISCUSSION ........................................................................................................................................ 6 A. Authority to Eliminate Sports Blackout Rules................................................................................. 7 B. Sports Blackout Rules No Longer Needed to Ensure that Sports Telecasts Are Widely Available to the Public................................................................................................................... 12 1. Primary Relevance to Professional Football ........................................................................... 13 2. NFL Gate Receipts and Other Revenues................................................................................. 14 3. Reduction in NFL Blackouts..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Response to FCC Inquiry Re WSAW-TV
    December 2, 2016 Ms. Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, DC 20554 RE: Response to Inquiry from FCC Staff Gray Television License, LLC, MB Docket No. 16-293 Dear Ms. Dortch: On behalf of Gray Television Licensee, LLC (“Gray”), I hereby provide responses to questions forwarded by Mr. Evan Baranoff via e-mail on November 21, 2016. As discussed in Gray’s Petition for Special Relief (the “Petition”), Gray’s WZAW-LD is the Fox affiliate for the Wausau- Rhinelander Designated Market Area (“DMA”). Gray simulcasts the WZAW-LD programming on one of its three digital subchannels for WSAW-TV. Granting the Petition will ensure that DIRECTV and DISH Network can secure the necessary copyright license to retransmit WSAW- TV’s Wisconsin-based and Wisconsin-focused programming in Ashland and Iron Counties, including providing a copyright license for the programming from WSAW-TV’s Fox-affiliated digital subchannel. 1. Explain the legal authority (both under Communications and Copyright laws) that would allow satellite carriage of the programming on WZAW-LP (Fox) if a market modification for WSAW was approved. Gray is not requesting that the FCC allow satellite carriage of the Fox-affiliated primary program stream of low power station WZAW-LD. Instead, Gray is requesting that the FCC modify the market of full power, commercial television station WSAW-TV. Upon grant of its Petition, Gray would elect retransmission consent for WSAW-TV in Ashland and Iron Counties.1 Gray then would 1 Amendment to the Commission’s Rules Concerning Market Modification, Report and Order, 30 FCC Rcd 10406, 10427 (2015) (“STELAR Order”) (“[W]hen a station’s market is modified for purposes of satellite carriage, then the station is entitled to elect either retransmission consent pursuant to Section 325 or mandatory carriage pursuant to Section 338 with respect to the new community or communities added to its market by the modification.”).
    [Show full text]
  • Now There's More for You Than Ever Before
    SIRIUS CHANNEL LINEUP Your subscription package will determine actual channel lineup. NOW THERE’S MORE FOR YOU THAN EVER BEFORE. PERSONALIZED STATIONS tra Powered by SiriusXM channels VIDEO Over 100 ad-free music Create customized, Get a backstage pass channels made for every ad-free music stations to your favorite shows, mood, occasion or activity, online or on the app.* including Howard Stern, available online and online and on the app.* on the app.* HEAR IT ALL OUTSIDE THE CAR Listening on your phone, online and at home is included in more packages, so you can enjoy your favorite channels and shows in more places. *Not available on all internet-connected devices. SIRIUS CHANNEL LINEUP Your subscription package will determine actual channel lineup. POP 34 ’90s Alternative/Grunge CHRISTIAN 02 Today’s Pop Hits 35 Indie & Beyond 63 Christian Pop & Rock 03 Today’s Trending Hits from Pandora 36 New Alternative Rock 64 Kirk Franklin’s Gospel Channel 04 Music to Energize Your Soul 37 New Hard Rock 65 Southern Gospel 05 Pop Hits 38 Ozzy’s Classic Hard Rock 39 ’80s Hair Metal & Glam JAZZ/STANDARDS/ 06 Pop Hits with Cousin Brucie CLASSICAL 40 Heavy Metal 07 Pop Hits with American Top 40 66 Smooth/Contemporary Jazz 41 ’90s/2000s Hard Rock 08 Pop Hits with Original MTV VJs 67 Classic Jazz HIP-HOP/R&B 09 Pop Hits with Downtown Julie Brown 68 New Age 42 Reggae 10 2000s Pop Hits 69 Easy Listening 43 LL COOL J’s Classic Hip-Hop 13 Worldwide Rhythmic Hits 70 Love Songs 44 Today’s Hip-Hop Hits 14 Acoustic/Singer-Songwriters 71 Standards by Sinatra & More 45 Eminem’s Hip-Hop Channel 15 Today’s Adult Hits 72 Show Tunes 46 Hot R&B & Hip-Hop 16 Bright Pop Hits 73 ’40s Pop Hits/Big Band 47 ’90s & 2000s Hip-Hop/R&B 17 Rock & Pop from the ’90s & 2000s 48 Adult R&B Hits 74 B.B.
    [Show full text]
  • Nfl Expanding Coverage of the 2018 Nfl Draft to Include Two Broadcast & Four Cable Television Networks
    NFL EXPANDING COVERAGE OF THE 2018 NFL DRAFT TO INCLUDE TWO BROADCAST & FOUR CABLE TELEVISION NETWORKS For the First Time Ever, All Seven Rounds of the NFL Draft to Air on Broadcast Television FOX NFL Lead Analyst Troy Aikman Joins NFL Draft Coverage 2018 NFL Draft Airs Thursday, April 26 – Saturday, April 28 The NFL today announced a new broadcast arrangement in which NFL Network and FOX will team up to simulcast live coverage of Rounds 1-3 of the 2018 NFL Draft. Additionally, the league has expanded its partnership with ESPN/ABC whereby ESPN2 will supplement ESPN's coverage of Round 1 with a separate and unique college-themed production in addition to a simulcast of ESPN's live coverage of Rounds 4-7 airing on ABC. The 2018 NFL Draft will be held Thursday, April 26 – Saturday, April 28 from AT&T Stadium in Arlington, TX. The expanded coverage gives the NFL Draft its largest audience reach ever, and marks the first time ever that the entirety of the live three-day event will air on broadcast television. Live streaming of the 2018 NFL Draft coverage will be available across devices (smartphone, PC, tablet and connected TVs) through the NFL app or NFL.com. Fans can also stream the live 2018 NFL Draft through FOX Sports and the ESPN App, available for subscribers of the networks' participating TV providers. The chart below provides a comprehensive look across both linear and digital channels where live coverage of the 2018 NFL Draft will be available: Draft Round Where to Watch NFL Network, FOX, ESPN, ESPN2, Round 1: Thursday, April 26 • 8:00 PM ET ESPN Deportes; NFL, FOX Sports and ESPN digital properties NFL Network, FOX, ESPN/ESPN2; NFL, Rounds 2-3: Friday, April 27 • 7:00 PM ET FOX Sports and ESPN digital properties NFL Network, ABC, ESPN; NFL and Rounds 4-7: Saturday, April 28 • Noon ET ESPN digital properties "The NFL Draft is a unique event on the NFL calendar where the promise and excitement of the future is universally felt among fans, players and clubs," said Brian Rolapp, Chief Media and Business Officer, NFL.
    [Show full text]