Education Guide Education Guide
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Starting Primary School Your Guide to Nursery, Reception and Primary Education in Newham
STARTING PRIMARY SCHOOL YOUR GUIDE TO NURSERY, RECEPTION AND PRIMARY EDUCATION IN NEWHAM AUTUMN Reception admissions in September 2018. Information relating 2017 EDITION to Pan London co-ordination and In Year admissions 2017/18 Closing date for applications 15 January 2018 1 | STARTING PRIMARY SCHOOL APPLY ONLINE – IT’S QUICK, @NewhamLondon SAFE AND SECURE www.newham.gov.uk/ schooladmissions A summary of the steps you need to take to apply for a place in reception in a Newham primary school for children born 1 September 2013 to 31 August 2014 Infant to Junior Transition If your child attends a Newham infant school, Newham Pupil Services will complete the process for you to move to your linked junior school. To apply for another school you must follow the process for reception. REMEMBER – your chances of getting the school of your preference are better if you apply by 15 January 2018. Understand what you need to do to apply for a primary school place. 1 You can do this by reading through this booklet. Take time to find out all the academies and schools located in Newham. You can do this by asking to 2 visit the schools and reading their own prospectuses. Read and understand how places are offered at each school you are interested in. You do this by reading their admissions criteria and reviewing the placements for September 2017 which are 3 published in this booklet. This will help you understand the likelihood of your child being offered a place. Decide the academies or schools you are gonig to name as your preferences. -
Harris Free School Tottenham 2
Free Schools in 2013 Application form Mainstream and 16-19 Free Schools Completing your application Before completing your application, please ensure that you have read the ‘How to Apply’ guidance carefully (which can be found here) and can provide all the information and documentation we have asked for – failure to do so may mean that we are unable to consider your application. The Free School application is made up of nine sections as follows: Section A: Applicant details and declaration Section B: Outline of the school Section C: Education vision Section D: Education plan Section E: Evidence of demand and marketing Section F: Capacity and capability Section G: Initial costs and financial viability Section H: Premises Section I: Due diligence and other checks In Sections A-H we are asking you to tell us about you and the school you want to establish and this template has been designed for this purpose. The boxes provided in each section will expand as you type. Section G requires you to provide two financial plans. To achieve this you must fill out and submit the templates provided here. Section I is about your suitability to run a Free School. There is a separate downloadable form for this information. This is available here You need to submit all the information requested in order for your application to be assessed. Sections A-H and the financial plans need to be submitted to the Department for Education by the application deadline. You need to submit one copy (of each) by email to:[email protected]. -
Schools Forum Data Sept 11.Xlsx
Schools Forum London Borough of Lewisham Absence Between 01/09/2010 and 31/08/2011 21 September 2011 Item 3 Appendix 1 Sum: Avg FTE Avg Days Brockley Primary School 512.40 27.64 18.54 Greenvale School 1,106.32 60.42 18.31 St Josephs RC Primary School 352.34 20.41 17.27 St Marys CE Primary School 459.91 26.74 17.20 Abbey Manor College 1,102.10 70.72 15.58 Holy Trinity CE Primary School 284.89 18.97 15.02 Lucas Vale Primary School 525.97 35.55 14.80 St James Hatcham CE Primary School 373.70 25.72 14.53 Torridon Infant School 402.10 28.97 13.88 Prendergast Ladywell Fields Sec Sch 1,090.80 79.49 13.72 Forster Park Primary School 632.14 47.53 13.30 Sandhurst Junior School 388.56 30.43 12.77 Meadowgate School 493.16 39.73 12.41 Watergate School 784.18 64.09 12.24 Crossways 6th Form 758.96 62.36 12.17 Perrymount Primary School 429.28 35.32 12.15 Edmund Waller Primary School 533.64 45.12 11.83 Chelwood Nursery School 201.72 17.07 11.82 Lewisham Bridge Primary School 321.39 28.70 11.20 Brindishe Green Primary School 626.85 57.19 10.96 Pendragon School 377.47 35.63 10.59 Elfrida Primary School 471.84 45.15 10.45 Sandhurst Infant School 320.38 31.86 10.06 Conisborough College 899.44 95.22 9.45 Sir Francis Drake Primary School 239.23 25.46 9.40 Trinity Lewisham CE Secondary School 464.23 50.01 9.28 Myatt Garden Primary School 397.04 43.23 9.18 John Stainer Primary School 232.52 25.64 9.07 Adamsrill Primary School 335.57 37.04 9.06 St Mary Magdalen's RC Primary School 183.91 20.45 8.99 Launcelot Primary School 372.00 42.87 8.68 Deptford Green Secondary -
Headlines by Rachel Mcgowan Mobile Phone Protocol Mobile Phones Are, to Many People, an Essential Feature of Everyday Life. in L
Issue 90 Working together to promote & celebrate achievement Friday 8th February 2019 Name & Tutor Group: Headlines by Rachel McGowan Mobile Phone Protocol Mobile phones are, to many people, an essential feature of everyday life. In light of the recent media attention about mobile phones in schools I wish to reiterate what has been Plashet School policy for over six years. I am aware that many parents want their daughter to have a phone on their journey to and from school to help ensure her safety. Within school students are safe and are able to contact home should they need to through reception. Similarly, parents/guardians can send messages to students by telephoning the school. Whilst on school site students are not allowed to use their mobile phones or have them visible at any time. This rule is in place to ensure that students concentrate entirely on their studies and, in unstructured time, they are not engaged in activities with a mobile phone that could put them or others at risk and they instead spend their break and lunchtimes talking rather than looking at a screen. If a student is seen using a mobile phone on school premises it will be confiscated and held in school for three working days. A letter will be sent home alerting parents/guardians of the confiscation. The confiscated mobile phone will be returned to the student’s parent or guardian after three days. If a parent wishes their daughter to have a mobile phone for the journey to and from school, the phone remains the responsibility of that student and the school does not accept any liability for any mobile phone lost or stolen in school whilst in the child’s possession. -
Newham Collegiate Impact Assessment
Newham Collegiate Impact Assessment Secondary schools with 6th form provision Number Average Average Average point 16-19 rating Distance Value added Value added Impact of pupils point score point score score on latest School name Type Faith from FS (academic) (academic) (preliminary ages 16- (academic) (academic) (academic) Ofsted (miles) (2015) (2016) judgement) 18 (2014) (2015) (2016) inspection Brampton Manor Academy No 16-19 None 0.5 348 236.3 254.6 40.2 (B) 0.5 ( + ) 0.68 ( + ) Minimal Academy Converter Ofsted rating Voluntary St Bonaventure's RC Roman Good Aided 1.3 236 202.7 203.9 28.8 (C) -0.1 -0.03 Moderate School Catholic (19-Mar-2009) VoluntarySchool St Angela's Ursuline Roman Outstanding Aided 1.5 419 214.2 212.7 28.6 (C) -0.1 ( - ) -0.09 Minimal School Catholic (25-Mar-2009) School University Insufficient Insufficient Insufficient Insufficient London Design and Insufficient No 16-19 Too early to Technical None 1.7 No data academic academic academic academic Engineering UTC academic pupils Ofsted rating assess College pupils pupils pupils pupils Insufficient Insufficient Insufficient Insufficient East London Science Free Insufficient No 16-19 None 1.7 No data academic academic academic academic Moderate School Schools academic pupils Ofsted rating pupils pupils pupils pupils Insufficient Insufficient Insufficient Insufficient Free Insufficient No 16-19 School 21 None 1.7 No data academic academic academic academic Moderate Schools academic pupils Ofsted rating pupils pupils pupils pupils Insufficient Insufficient Communit -
The Industrial and Community Heritage of Silvertown and North Woolwich Introduction
The industrial and community heritage of Silvertown and North Woolwich Introduction The Islanders is a project that aims to preserve the industrial and community heritage of Silvertown and North Woolwich. It is supported by the National Lottery Heritage Fund and the Royal Docks Team. Volunteers and local participants have contributed significantly to the project. Thames Festival Trust thanks Newham Archives (The Islanders’ Heritage Partner), London Metropolitan Archives and Eastside Community Heritage. In the nineteenth century, London’s eastern boundary was at Bow Creek, where its noxious industries began to congregate. From shipbuilding, to silver, iron, oils, soap, rubber and manure, London’s industry was developing on the fringes of the city. By the completion of the Albert Dock in 1880, Silvertown and North Woolwich had effectively become an ‘island’. It was bordered by the Thames to the south, and by the Royal Docks and its lock entrances to the north, east and west, the only way in or out was by bridge, ferry or tunnel. Learn more: To find out more, scan the QR codes on your smart phone to follow the growth and hear the stories of this ‘island’ community through the generations. September 2021 Left: Goad Fire Insurance Plan, May 1900 (The British Library) 3 The origins Prior to the nineteenth century, Silvertown and North Woolwich was an uninhabited marshland called Plaistow Level used for grazing cattle, and frequented by smugglers, prize fighters, and high tide flooding, sat between Bow Creek and Gallions Reach. In the 1840s, the area was sold cheaply at an ‘agricultural price’ to a consortium of developers. -
School/College Name Post Code Visitors
School/college name Post code Visitors Alec Reed Academy UB5 5LQ 35 Anglo-European School CM4 0DJ 187 Ashlyns School HP4 3AH 140 Ashmole Academy (formerly Ashmole School) N14 5RJ 200 Barking Abbey School IG11 9AG 270 Barnet and Southgate College EN5 4AZ 115 Barnett Southgate College, London EN5 4AZ 45 Becket Keys Church of England Secondary School CM15 9DA 80 Beths Grammar School DA5 1NA 305 Big Creative Education E175QJ 65 Birchwood High School CM23 5BD 151 Bishop Challoner Catholic School E13 9LD 2 Bishop Thomas Grant School, London SW16 SW16 2HY 391 Blackfen School for Girls DA15 9NU 100 Box Hill School RH5 6EA 65 Brampton Manor Academy RH5 6EA 50 Brentwood Ursuline Convent High School CM14 4EX 111 Bromley High School BR!2TW 55 Buckinghamshire College Group HP21 8PD 50 Canons High School HA8 6AN 130 Capel Manor College, Enfield Campus W3 8LQ 26 Carshalton College SM5 2EJ 52 Carshalton High School for Girls SM52QX 100 CATS College London WC1A 2RA 80 Cavendish School HP1 3DW 42 Cedars Upper School, Bedfordshire LU7 2AE 130 Central Foundation Girls School E3 2AE 155 Chalfonts Community College, Gerrards Cross SL9 8TP 105 Charles Darwin Secondary School TN16 3AU 97 Chatham and Clarendon Grammar School CT11 9AL 120 Chestnut Grove Academy SW12 8JZ 140 Chobham Academy E20 1DQ 160 Christ's College, Finchley N2 0SE 98 City & Islington College, Applied Sciences EC1V7DD 420 City and Islington College N7 OSP 23 City and Islington Sixth Form College EC1V 7LA 54 City of London Academy (Islington) N1 8PQ 60 Colchester Institute (including The College -
UCAS Teacher Training End of Cycle 2017 Data Resources UTT3 002 01 Acceptances by Provider and Domicile
UCAS Teacher Training End of Cycle 2017 Data Resources UTT3_002_01 Acceptances by provider and domicile Statistic: Acceptances Variables: Provider Name, Applicant Domicile (UK/EU/Not EU), Cycle Year Coverage: All Definitions Provider Name The UCAS Teacher Training provider at the time of the application. This does not take into account any mergers or rebrands, for example if Provider A and Provider B merged to become Provider A in 2016, all applications and acceptances will be reported as Provider A from 2016 onwards. Prior to 2016 all applications and acceptances will be reported as Provider A or Provider B as appropriate. Applicant Domicile (UK/EU/Not EU) Applicant's area of permanent residence summarised at a high level. This variable is derived from domicile as declared by the applicant. Split by the following values: 'UK' , 'EU (excluding UK)' and 'Not EU'. Please note: The Channel Islands and the Isle of Man have been assigned as 'Not EU'. See the additional technical notes at www.ucas.com for coverage and trends for Scotland. Cycle Year The application year in which the application was processed. Acceptances An acceptance is defined as an applicant who has been accepted to start a programme through the UCAS Teacher Training scheme. End of Cycle 2017 Data Resources: UTT3_002_01. UCAS Analysis and Insights, published on Thursday 17 May 2018 at www.ucas.com UCAS: UTT3_002_01 Acceptances by provider and domicile (All) Acceptances by Cycle Year Provider Name, Applicant Domicile (UK/EU/Not EU) 2014 2015 2016 2017 T92 - 2Schools Consortium -
Business Action Groups for Schools Autumn Term Report 2014
Business Action Groups for Schools Autumn term report 2014 BAGSBAGS this this Autumn Autumn:: In this issue 5,0275,799 beneficiaries beneficiaries 114 activities 174 activities Young People Highlights 2 924 volunteers 1,143 volunteers in 14 schools. in 14 schools Borough Perspective; 6 Though this report focuses Cllr Mark Rusling and Eddie Playfair mainlyWe welcome on youngd NewVI people,c to the the Jo Emmerson Jo Emmerson BAGSBAGS team programme. is currently NewVIc Cross School Events 7 Education Works has had a long term Education Works working on ensuring that ProgrammeProgramme Director relationship with ELBA Strategic & Institutional Highlights 9 therethrough is more our up takeCommunity on other strands of the BAGS DearDear BusinessBusiness ActionAction Groups Works programme and has for Schools colleague strategyrecently including joined strategicBAGS for Groups for Schools andsupport institutional in support,strengthening ColleagueAs ELBA's new Education Our schools leadershengagementip and withgovernance. employers. Works Programme Director, I would like to welcome you to WithWe theare implementation looking forward of to Welcome to the Business the latest edition of the theworking BAGS evaluationwith the L&Q Action Groups for Schools Business Action Groups for frameworkFoundation including which h asJET joined (BAGS)Schools end(BAGS) of term End reportof Term KPMG as one of the key over the next academic whichReport. brings you highlights sponsors of the BAGS year,programme we will .be reportingWith their fromThis termanother the busyteam term.has been backsupport on the we full are impact now lookingthat delivering a variety of activity to expand the programme to across the schools and the BAGS programme is This term has been filled reach more schools through businesses with which we achieving. -
MGLA260719-8697 Date
Our ref: MGLA260719-8697 Date: 22 August 2018 Dear Thank you for your request for information which the GLA received on 26 June 2019. Your request has been dealt with under the Environmental Information Regulations (EIR) 2004. Our response to your request is as follows: 1. Please provide the precise number and list of locations/names of primary and secondary schools in London where air pollution breaches legal limit, according to your most recent data (I believe the same metric has been used across the years, of annual mean limit of 40ug/m3 NO2, but please clarify). If you are able to provide more recent data without breaching the s12 time limit please do. If not, please provide underlying data from May 2018 (see below). Please provide as a spreadsheet with school name, pollution level, and any location information such as borough. This data is available on the London datastore. The most recent available data is from the London Atmospheric Emission Inventory (LAEI) 2016 and was published in April 2019. The data used for the 2018 report is LAEI 2013. Please find attached a list and a summary of all Educational Establishments in London and NO2 levels based on both the LAEI 2013 update and LAEI 2016. The list has been taken from the register of educational establishments in England and Wales, maintained by the Department for Education, and provides information on establishments providing compulsory, higher and further education. It was downloaded on 21/03/2019, just before the release of the LAEI 2016. The attached spreadsheet has recently been published as part of the LAEI 2016 stats on Datastore here. -
Annual Report 2017
Annual Report 2017 Published February 2018 Challenge Partners is a Contents 1. THE PARTNERSHIP 2 practitioner-led education About Challenge Partners 3 Message from the Chief Executive 4 charity that enables Our principles and approach 6 collaboration between Challenge Partners by numbers 10 2. OUR COLLECTIVE AIMS 12 It is possible to have both excellence 13 schools to enhance the and equity in our education system Our aims 16 life chances of all children, Impact and performance against our aims 17 3. THE PROGRAMMES 20 especially the most Our programmes 21 The Network of Excellence 22 disadvantaged. Hubs 24 The Quality Assurance Review 27 Leadership Development Days 32 Leadership Residency Programme 32 School Support Directory 32 Events 33 Challenge the Gap 34 Getting Ahead London 40 EAL in the mainstream classroom 43 4. FINANCES 44 Income and expenditure 44 5. LOOKING FORWARD 45 6. LIST OF CHALLENGE PARTNERS SCHOOLS 46 1. The partnership About Challenge Partners Challenge Partners is a practitioner-led education charity that enables collaborative school improvement networks to enhance the life chances of all children, especially the most disadvantaged. Challenge Partners was formed to continue the learning which emerged from the development of Teaching Schools that evolved out of the London Challenge. Since its formation in 2011, the outcomes for pupils in Challenge Partners schools have consistently improved faster than the national average. We provide networks and programmes that facilitate sustainable collaboration and challenge between schools in order to underpin improvements in outcomes which would not be possible for a school, or group of schools, to achieve as effectively on its own. -
Lewisham's Determined Admissions Criteria For
Appendix A Lewisham’s proposed admissions criteria for nursery schools and nursery classes in community primary schools (children starting nursery during the academic year 2022/23) Where there is over-subscription, places will be offered to: 1 A looked after child’ or a child who was previously looked after but immediately after being looked after became subject to an adoption, child arrangements, or special guardianship order. A looked after child is a child who is a) in the care of a local authority, or b) being provided with accommodation by a local authority in the exercise of their social services functions (see definition in Section 22(1) of the Children Act 1989). Details must be supplied by the allocated social worker or foster carer. .* it is expected that a revised School Admissions Code, expected early in 2020, will revise the definition of a looked after child to include children who have been adopted from care from outside of England. 2 In exceptional circumstances there is discretion to admit vulnerable children, as proposed by Lewisham’s Children Centre Criteria for Priority or Excluded (POE), on the grounds of their or their family’s severe medical or social need for that particular school and who would not otherwise qualify for admission. The application must be supported by a letter from a hospital consultant, social worker or similar professional, setting out the reasons why the nursery is the only one able to meet the child’s needs, before an admission decision is made. The admission decision will be made by the headteacher who may consult with the Executive Director for Children and Young People.