DOCSLIB.ORG

Fishery Name West Greenland Coldwater Prawn

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fishery Name West Greenland Coldwater Prawn Acoura Marine 4th Surveillance Report West Greenland Coldwater Prawn Fishery MSC SUSTAINABLE FISHERIES CERTIFICATION On-Site Surveillance Visit - Report for West Greenland Coldwater prawn fishery 4th Surveillance stage March 2017 Certificate Code F-ACO-0027 Prepared For: Sustainable Fisheries Greenland Prepared By: Acoura Marine Authors: Rod Cappell, Beth Mouat, John Hambrey Acoura Version V2.2 04/01/17 Acoura Marine 4th Surveillance Report West Greenland Coldwater Prawn Fishery Assessment Data Sheet Fishery name West Greenland Coldwater Prawn Species and Stock Coldwater prawn (Pandalus borealis) CAB name Acoura Marine CAB contact details Address 6 Redheughs Rigg Edinburgh EH12 9DQ Phone/Fax 0131 335 6662 Email [email protected] Contact name(s) Billy Hynes Client contact details Address Sustainable Fisheries Greenland Jens Kreutzmannip Aqqutaa 3, Post Office Box 73, 3900 Nuuk, Greenland. Phone/Fax +45 98 29 44 22 Email [email protected] Contact name(s) Peder Munk Pederson Page 2 of 55 Acoura Marine Full Assessment Template per MSC V2.0 02/12/2015 Acoura Marine 4th Surveillance Report West Greenland Coldwater Prawn Fishery Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Scope of Surveillance ............................................................................................................. 5 1.2 Aims of the Surveillance .......................................................................................................... 5 1.3 Certificate Holder Details ........................................................................................................ 5 2 Surveillance Process .................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Findings of the original assessment ........................................................................................ 6 2.2 Surveillance Activity ................................................................................................................ 6 2.2.1 Surveillance team details ................................................................................................ 6 2.2.2 Date & Location of surveillance audit .............................................................................. 6 2.2.3 Stakeholder consultation & meetings .............................................................................. 6 2.2.4 What was inspected ........................................................................................................ 6 2.2.5 Stakeholder Consultation ................................................................................................ 6 2.3 Surveillance Standards ........................................................................................................... 6 2.3.1 MSC Standards, Requirements and Guidance used ...................................................... 6 2.3.2 Confirmation that destructive fishing practices or controversial unilateral exemptions have not been introduced ................................................................................................................ 7 3 Updated Fishery Background ...................................................................................................... 8 3.1 Changes in the management system ..................................................................................... 8 3.2 Changes in relevant regulations.............................................................................................. 8 3.3 Changes to personnel involved in science, management or industry..................................... 8 3.4 Changes to scientific base of information including stock assessments ................................ 9 3.4.1 Stock Assessment & status ............................................................................................. 9 3.4.2 Other scientific information ............................................................................................ 11 3.5 Changes and updates on Ecosystem issues ........................................................................ 14 3.6 Any developments or changes within the fishery which impact traceability or the ability to segregate between fish from the Unit of Certification (UoC) and fish from outside the UoC (non- certified fish) ...................................................................................................................................... 15 3.7 TAC and catch data .............................................................................................................. 15 3.8 Summary of Assessment Conditions .................................................................................... 16 4 Results ......................................................................................................................................... 17 4.1 Condition 1 ............................................................................................................................ 17 4.2 Condition 3 ............................................................................................................................ 19 4.3 Condition 4 ............................................................................................................................ 26 4.4 Condition 6 ............................................................................................................................ 27 4.5 Condition 7 ............................................................................................................................ 27 4.6 Recommendation 1 ............................................................................................................... 28 5 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................... 30 5.1 Summary of findings ............................................................................................................. 30 6 References ................................................................................................................................... 31 Page 3 of 55 Acoura Marine Full Assessment Template per MSC V2.0 02/12/2015 Acoura Marine 4th Surveillance Report West Greenland Coldwater Prawn Fishery Appendix 1 – Re-scoring evaluation tables ....................................................................................... 32 Appendix 2 - Stakeholder submissions ............................................................................................. 49 Appendix 3 - Surveillance audit information (if necessary) ............................................................... 50 Appendix 4 - Additional detail on conditions/ actions/ results (if necessary) .................................... 51 Page 4 of 55 Acoura Marine Full Assessment Template per MSC V2.0 02/12/2015 Acoura Marine 4th Surveillance Report West Greenland Coldwater Prawn Fishery 1 Introduction 1.1 Scope of Surveillance This report outlines the findings of the 4th Annual Surveillance of the West Greenland coldwater prawn fishery. The scope of the certified fishery and therefore of this surveillance is specified in the Unit of Certification set out below: UoC 1 Species This species has a number of common names: Greenland Prawn / Cold Water Prawn / Northern Prawn / Northern Shrimp (Pandalus borealis) Geographical area West Greenland (Greenland Waters within NAFO Divisions 1A- F) Method of capture Shrimp trawl using otter boards Stock West Greenland Shrimp (NAFO Division 0A (east of 60°30' W) and Divisions 1A-F) Management Greenland Government, Department for Fishery, Hunting and Agriculture. Client Group All Greenland fishers and fishing companies holding a licence for prawn fishery in West Greenland. 1.2 Aims of the Surveillance The purpose of the annual Surveillance Report is fourfold: 1. to establish and report on whether or not there have been any material changes to the circumstances and practices affecting the original complying assessment of the fishery; 2. to monitor the progress made to improve those practices that have been scored as below “good practice” (a score of 80 or above) but above “minimum acceptable practice” (a score of 60 or above) – as captured in any “conditions” raised and described in the Public Report and in the corresponding Action Plan drawn up by the client; 3. to monitor any actions taken in response to any (non-binding) “recommendations” made in the Public Report; 4. to re-score any Performance Indicators (PIs) where practice or circumstances have materially changed during the intervening year, focusing on those PIs that form the basis of any “conditions” raised. Please note: The primary focus of this surveillance audit is assess changes made in the previous year. For a complete picture, this report should be read in conjunction with the Public Certification Report for this fishery assessment which can be found here: https://fisheries.msc.org/en/fisheries/west-greenland-coldwater-prawn/@@assessments 1.3 Certificate Holder Details Sustainable Fisheries Greenland continue to be the certificate holder for this fishery, which is targeted by vessels from the two member companies, Polar Seafoods and Royal Greenland. Page 5 of 55 Acoura Marine Full Assessment Template per MSC V2.0 02/12/2015 Acoura Marine 4th Surveillance Report West Greenland Coldwater Prawn Fishery 2 Surveillance Process 2.1 Findings of the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pandalus Jordani Range: Pink Shrimp Are Known to Inhabit Southeast
    Fishery-at-a-Glance: Pink (Ocean) Shrimp Scientific Name: Pandalus jordani Range: Pink Shrimp are known to inhabit Southeast Alaska to San Diego, California, and most abundant off the coast of Oregon. Habitat: Pink Shrimp dwell in deep waters,150 to 1,200 feet (45.7 to 365.8 meters), aggregating near the bottom during the day in well-defined areas of muddy habitat called beds and ascending into the water column at night to feed. Size (length and weight): Pink Shrimp are fast-growing. Individual growth rates vary by sex, location, year class, season, and age. Mean carapace length for 1-, 2-, and 3-year- old shrimp ranges from 0.5 to 0.7 inches (13 to 17 millimeters), 0.7 to 1.0 inches (18 to 25 millimeters), and 1.0 to 1.1 inches (25 to 29 millimeters), respectively. Life span: Pink Shrimp are short-lived at approximately 5 years. In California, few shrimp survive beyond the fourth year. Reproduction: Pink Shrimp are protandric hermaphrodites, changing sex from males to females after approximately the first year and a half. Mating occurs during September to October. Prey: Pink Shrimp feed on zooplankton, including copepods and krill. Stomach contents have also included diatoms, sponges, polychaetes, amphipods, and isopods. Predators: Many commercially important fish species, including Pacific Hake (Merluccius productus), Arrowtooth Flounder (Atheresthes stomia), Sablefish (Anoploploma fimbria), Petrale Sole (Eopsetta jordani), Spiny Dogfish (Squalus acanthias), and several species of rockfish and skates prey on Pink Shrimp. Fishery: There is only a commercial fishery for Pink Shrimp. Point Conception divides the northern and southern management regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Impacts of Shrimp Fishing On
    ASSESSING THE IMPACTS OF SHRIMP FISHING ON SABELLARIA SPINULOSA REEF AND ASSOCIATED BIODIVERSITY IN THE WASH AND NORTH NORFOLK SAC, INNER DOWSING RACE BANK NORTH RIDGE SAC AND SURROUNDING AREAS PILOT STUDY Kim Last1, Vicki Hendrick1, Ian Sotheran2, Bob Foster-Smith2, Dan Foster-Smith2, and Zoë Hutchison1 Final Report for Natural England May 2012 1 SAMS Research Services Ltd. 2 Envision Scottish Association of Marine Science Stephenson House Scottish Marine Institute Horsley Business Centre Oban, Argyll, PA37 1QA Horsley, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE15 0NY Impacts of shrimp fishing on S. spinulosa reef TABLE OF CONTENTS Background ................................................................................................................................... 4 Aims .............................................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 4 Strategy ......................................................................................................................................... 8 Sampling Design ........................................................................................................................... 9 Equipment ................................................................................................................................... 10 Multibeam (Interferometric Bathymetry System) ....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • De Grave & Fransen. Carideorum Catalogus
    De Grave & Fransen. Carideorum catalogus (Crustacea: Decapoda). Zool. Med. Leiden 85 (2011) 407 Fig. 48. Synalpheus hemphilli Coutière, 1909. Photo by Arthur Anker. Synalpheus iphinoe De Man, 1909a = Synalpheus Iphinoë De Man, 1909a: 116. [8°23'.5S 119°4'.6E, Sapeh-strait, 70 m; Madura-bay and other localities in the southern part of Molo-strait, 54-90 m; Banda-anchorage, 9-36 m; Rumah-ku- da-bay, Roma-island, 36 m] Synalpheus iocasta De Man, 1909a = Synalpheus Iocasta De Man, 1909a: 119. [Makassar and surroundings, up to 32 m; 0°58'.5N 122°42'.5E, west of Kwadang-bay-entrance, 72 m; Anchorage north of Salomakiëe (Damar) is- land, 45 m; 1°42'.5S 130°47'.5E, 32 m; 4°20'S 122°58'E, between islands of Wowoni and Buton, northern entrance of Buton-strait, 75-94 m; Banda-anchorage, 9-36 m; Anchorage off Pulu Jedan, east coast of Aru-islands (Pearl-banks), 13 m; 5°28'.2S 134°53'.9E, 57 m; 8°25'.2S 127°18'.4E, an- chorage between Nusa Besi and the N.E. point of Timor, 27-54 m; 8°39'.1 127°4'.4E, anchorage south coast of Timor, 34 m; Mid-channel in Solor-strait off Kampong Menanga, 113 m; 8°30'S 119°7'.5E, 73 m] Synalpheus irie MacDonald, Hultgren & Duffy, 2009: 25; Figs 11-16; Plate 3C-D. [fore-reef (near M1 chan- nel marker), 18°28.083'N 77°23.289'W, from canals of Auletta cf. sycinularia] Synalpheus jedanensis De Man, 1909a: 117. [Anchorage off Pulu Jedan, east coast of Aru-islands (Pearl- banks), 13 m] Synalpheus kensleyi (Ríos & Duffy, 2007) = Zuzalpheus kensleyi Ríos & Duffy, 2007: 41; Figs 18-22; Plate 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Methods for Rearing Larval Decapod Crustacea
    Helgol~nder wiss. Meeresunters. 20, 417-434 (1970) Methods for rearing larval decapod Crustacea A. L. •ICE 1 and D. I. YflLLIAMSON2 1 British Museum (Natural History); London, Great Britain, and 2 Marine Biological Station; Port Erin, Isle of Man, Great Britain KURZFASSUNG: Methoden zur Zucht larvaler decapoder Crustaceen. Es werden Methoden zur Gewinnung und Zucht yon Larven decapoder Crustaceen beschrieben. Die mit Erfoig ein- gesetzten Zuchteinrichtungen reichen yon einfachen Glasschalen bis zu Ger~iten mit Wasser- zirkulation, Bel~ifiung, Ultraviolettbestrahlung und Temperaturkontrolle. Wert und Verffig- barkeit verschiedener Nahrungsobjekte sowle die Bedeutung yon Temperatur, Salzgehalt, Licht und Wasserqualit~it werden er~Jrtert. Methoden fiir die Massenzucht decapoder Crustacea wet- den kurz beschrieben und allgemeine Richtlinien in bezug auf die Wahl der Kultivierungs- methode und die Zielsetzung der Untersuchungen diskutiert. INTRODUCTION The metamorphosis of decapod crustaceans was first demonstrated by THOMVSON in 1828 but was not accepted by the scientific community as the usual mode of devel- opment in the group until many years later. Thereaflcer, however, developmental studies progressed steadily, but during the 19th century and well into the 20th century, larvae were still described mostly from preserved material taken from field plankton. Identification of the species to which these larvae belonged was difficult, and many larvae, particularly those from poorly known deep waters, were described as distinct genera. With the development of marine biological laboratories and better facilities for maintaining living animals, zoologists began to hatch the early stages from ovigerous females and to maintain plankton-caught larvae until they moulted into the next stage, with the eventual aim of linking a series of such moults with an identifiable form.
    [Show full text]
  • Pandalus Montagui) in Trawl Survey Samples from NAFO Subareas 0+1
    NOT TO BE CITED WITHOUT PRIOR REFERENCE TO THE AUTHOR(S) Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization Serial No. N4909 NAFO SCR Doc. 03/70 SCIENTIFIC COUNCIL MEETING – NOVEMBER 2003 Occurrence of (Pandalus montagui) in Trawl Survey Samples from NAFO Subareas 0+1 by P. Kanneworff Greenland Institute of Natural Resources, Box 570 DK-3900 Nuuk, Greenland Abstract Stratified-random surveys have been carried out since 1988 in NAFO Subarea 1 and Division 0A as a component of the assessment of the stock of Pandalus borealis off West Greenland. Pandalus montagui has occurred frequently as by-catch in a large part of the surveyed area. This paper updates the earlier reported time series with data from surveys in 2001-2003. Biomass estimates are calculated, and large variations from year to year are indicated. However, as the survey design was applied for investigating the stock of P. borealis it was not optimal for P. montagui. Hence the resulting biomasses are considered to be somewhat underestimated. Introduction Since 1988, Greenland Institute of Natural Resources has conducted annual stratified-random trawl surveys in the distribution area of Pandalus borealis in Davis Strait. Occurrence of other species in the catches has been recorded, and this paper presents update of data on biomass estimates of Pandalus montagui (Kanneworff, 2000). Material and Methods The basic survey design has been constructed with reference to the distribution of the stock of Pandalus borealis, as has the allocation of stations to the various strata (Kanneworff and Wieland, 2003). For the sampling period 1988 to 1997 trawl stations were allocated to strata proportionally to the area of the strata, but from 1998 station allocation have been weighted towards strata with observed high P.
    [Show full text]
  • Variation Request
    Marine Stewardship Council - Variation Request Date submitted to MSC 10th April 2018 Name of CAB Acoura Marine Fishery Name/CoC West Greenland coldwater prawn Certificate Number Lead Auditor/Programme Rod Cappell/Billy Hynes Manager Variation prepared by: John Hambrey Scheme requirement(s) for CR2.0 7.4.14.2 allow an exemption to requirements for IPI stocks which variation requested Is this variation sought in Yes order to fulfil IPI requirements (FCR 7.4.14)? 1. Proposed variation N/A 2. Rationale/Justification N/A 3. Implications for assessment (required for fisheries assessment variations only) N/A 4. Have the stakeholders of this fishery No assessment been informed of this request? (required for fisheries assessment variations only) 5. Further Comments N/A 6. Confidential Information [DELETE IF NOT APPLICABLE] N/A 7. Inseparable or practicably inseparable (IPI) catches [DELETE IF NOT APPLICABLE] Is this request to allow fish or fish products from IPI stocks to enter into No/ chains of custody? N/A Is this request to allow an exemption to detailed requirements for IPI Yes stocks? Under the original certification for this fishery, an application to allow P. montagui to be an IPI stock was made and accepted by MSC. Because the proportion of P. montagui was between 2 and 15% the the IPI status could only be applied for one assessment. In order for the product to continue to use the MSC logo the client must either, per Annex PA6, a) have P. montagui assessed under Principle 1 at a re-assessment; or, b) develop techniques to effectively separate catches of P.
    [Show full text]
  • Dinburgh Encyclopedia;
    THE DINBURGH ENCYCLOPEDIA; CONDUCTED DY DAVID BREWSTER, LL.D. \<r.(l * - F. R. S. LOND. AND EDIN. AND M. It. LA. CORRESPONDING MEMBER OF THE ROYAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF PARIS, AND OF THE ROYAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF TRUSSLi; JIEMBER OF THE ROYAL SWEDISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES; OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF SCIENCES OF DENMARK; OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF GOTTINGEN, AND OF THE ROYAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF MODENA; HONORARY ASSOCIATE OF THE ROYAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF LYONS ; ASSOCIATE OF THE SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS; MEMBER OF THE SOCIETY OF THE AN­ TIQUARIES OF SCOTLAND; OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON, AND OF THE ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON; OF THE AMERICAN ANTlftUARIAN SOCIETY; HONORARY MEMBER OF THE LITERARY AND PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY OF NEW YORK, OF THE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF NEW YORK; OF THE LITERARY AND PHILOSOPHICAL SOClE'i'Y OF li riiECHT; OF THE PimOSOPHIC'.T- SOC1ETY OF CAMBRIDGE; OF THE LITERARY AND ANTIQUARIAN SOCIETY OF PERTH: OF THE NORTHERN INSTITUTION, AND OF THE ROYAL MEDICAL AND PHYSICAL SOCIETIES OF EDINBURGH ; OF THE ACADEMY OF NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA ; OF THE SOCIETY OF THE FRIENDS OF NATURAL HISTORY OF BERLIN; OF THE NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY OF FRANKFORT; OF THE PHILOSOPHICAL AND LITERARY SOCIETY OF LEEDS, OF THE ROYAL GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF CORNWALL, AND OF THE PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY OF YORK. WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF GENTLEMEN. EMINENT IN SCIENCE AND LITERATURE. IN EIGHTEEN VOLUMES. VOLUME VII. EDINBURGH: PRINTED FOR WILLIAM BLACKWOOD; AND JOHN WAUGH, EDINBURGH; JOHN MURRAY; BALDWIN & CRADOCK J. M. RICHARDSON, LONDON 5 AND THE OTHER PROPRIETORS. M.DCCC.XXX.- .
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Management of Marine Natural Resources - Mapping Natural Resources Survey Report
    Welsh Government Sustainable Management of Marine Natural Resources - Mapping Natural Resources Survey Report October 2020 Page intentionally left blank Sustainable Management of Marine Natural Resources - Mapping Natural Resources Survey Report October 2020 Sustainable Management of Marine Natural Resources - Mapping Natural Resources: Survey Report Welsh Government Document Information Document History and Authorisation Title Sustainable Management of Marine Natural Resources - Mapping Natural Resources Survey Report Commissioned by Welsh Government Issue date October 2020 Document ref R.3526 Project no R/4725/2 Date Version Revision Details 16/09/2020 1 Issued for client review - unsigned 16/10/2020 2 Issued for client use 27/10/2020 3 Issued for client use - web links updated Prepared (PM) Approved (QM) Authorised (PD) C R Trigg N J Frost S C Hull Suggested Citation ABPmer, (2020). Sustainable Management of Marine Natural Resources - Mapping Natural Resources, Survey Report, ABPmer Report No. R.3526. A report produced by ABPmer for Welsh Government, October 2020. Contributing Authors Vicky West, and Paul Clement Notice ABP Marine Environmental Research Ltd ("ABPmer") has prepared this document in accordance with the client’s instructions, for the client’s sole purpose and use. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of ABPmer. ABPmer does not accept liability to any person other than the client. If the client discloses this document to a third party, it shall make them aware that ABPmer shall not be liable to them in relation to this document. The client shall indemnify ABPmer in the event that ABPmer suffers any loss or damage as a result of the client’s failure to comply with this requirement.
    [Show full text]
  • Synopsis of Biological Data on the Pink Shrimp, Pandalus Borealis, Kroyer, 1983
    s.) OAA Technical Report NMFS 30 Synopsis- of BoIogicaData the PinkShrimp, Pa n da i u s b o re a lis Mi 1985 FAO Fisheries Synopsis No. 144 ÑMFS!S 144 SAST-Ptod'i/us borealis 2,28(04)022,03 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service NOAA TECHNICAL REPORTS NMFS The major responsibilities of the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) are to monitor and assess the abundance and geographic distribution of fishery resources, to understand and predict fluctuations in the quantity and distribution of these resources, and to establish levels for optimum use of the resources. NMFS is also charged with the development and iinplemen' tation of policies for managing national fishing grounds, development and enforcement of domestic fisheries regulations, surveillance of foreign fishing off United States coastal waters, and the development and enforcement of international fishery agreements and policies. NMFS also assists the fishing industry through marketing service and ,nmc analysis programs, and mortgage insurance and vessel construction subsidies. lt collects, analyzes, and publish'.......: various phases of the industry. The NOAA Technical Report NMFS series was establishcd in 1983 to replace two subcate.:.ri'.s of the 'Technical Reports series: "Special Scïentific Report'....'Fisheries" and "Circular' The series contains the following types of reports: S,.'ntific investigations that document longierm continuing programs of NMFS. Intensive scientific reports on studies of ....tricted scope, papers on applied fishery problems, technical reports of general interest ìntended to aid conservation and ::i:........o... reports that review in considerable detail and ai a high technical level certain hrocareas uf research.
    [Show full text]
  • Sabellaria Spinulosa Reef in the Wash and North
    Report Number 543 Sabellaria spinulosa reef in The Wash and North Norfolk Coast cSAC and its approaches: Part III, Summary of knowledge, recommended monitoring strategies and outstanding research requirements English Nature Research Reports working today for nature tomorrow English Nature Research Reports Number 543 Sabellaria spinulosa reef in The Wash and North Norfolk cSAC and its approaches: Part III, Summary of knowledge, recommended monitoring strategies and outstanding research requirements R.L. Foster-Smith and V.J. Hendrick Envision Mapping Ridley Building Newcastle University Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU March 2003 A report for the Eastern Sea Fisheries Joint Committee and English Nature Nominated Officer: Conor Donnelly You may reproduce as many additional copies of this report as you like, provided such copies stipulate that copyright remains with English Nature, Northminster House, Peterborough PE1 1UA ISSN 0967-876X © Copyright English Nature 2004 Contents 1. Introduction....................................................................................................................9 2. The Wash .......................................................................................................................9 2.1 The Wash, its conservation status and it’s uses.................................................9 2.2 Background to Wash surveys...........................................................................10 3. Sabellaria spinulosa – General review of the literature ..............................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Biodiversity on the Scotian Shelf and in the Bay of Fundy
    Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat (CSAS) Research Document 2016/006 Maritimes Region Mapping Biodiversity on the Scotian Shelf and in the Bay of Fundy C.A. Ward-Paige and A. Bundy Science Branch, Maritimes Region Ocean and Ecosystem Science Division Fisheries and Oceans Canada PO Box 1006, 1 Challenger Drive Dartmouth, Nova Scotia B2Y 4A2 March 2016 Foreword This series documents the scientific basis for the evaluation of aquatic resources and ecosystems in Canada. As such, it addresses the issues of the day in the time frames required and the documents it contains are not intended as definitive statements on the subjects addressed but rather as progress reports on ongoing investigations. Research documents are produced in the official language in which they are provided to the Secretariat. Published by: Fisheries and Oceans Canada Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat 200 Kent Street Ottawa ON K1A 0E6 http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/csas-sccs/ [email protected] © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2016 ISSN 1919-5044 Correct citation for this publication: Ward-Paige, C.A., and Bundy, A. 2016. Mapping Biodiversity on the Scotian Shelf and in the Bay of Fundy. DFO Can. Sci. Advis. Sec. Res. Doc. 2016/006. v + 90 p. TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................ iv RÉSUMÉ .................................................................................................................................... v INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • En Report (Scie) F&B
    Report Number 542 The Lincolnshire and North Norfolk maritime area: A review of the past and present status of its species and habitats English Nature Research Reports working today for nature tomorrow English Nature Research Reports Number 542 The Lincolnshire and North Norfolk maritime area: A review of the past and present status of its species and habitats Frances Dipper March 2003 You may reproduce as many additional copies of this report as you like, provided such copies stipulate that copyright remains with English Nature, Northminster House, Peterborough PE1 1UA ISSN 0967-876X © Copyright English Nature 2003 THE LINCOLNSHIRE AND NORTH NORFOLK MARITIME AREA: A REVIEW OF THE PAST AND PRESENT STATUS OF IT’S SPECIES AND HABITATS by FRANCES DIPPER Marine Biologist 7 Rutland Green Hilton Huntingdon PE28 9NT March 2003 Summary.......................................................................................................................................... i Summary table ...............................................................................................................................iii 1 Introduction............................................................................................................................. 1 2 Methods................................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Species ............................................................................................................................ 2 2.2 Sources
    [Show full text]