DOCSLIB.ORG

Sabellaria Spinulosa Reef in the Wash and North

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sabellaria Spinulosa Reef in the Wash and North Report Number 543 Sabellaria spinulosa reef in The Wash and North Norfolk Coast cSAC and its approaches: Part III, Summary of knowledge, recommended monitoring strategies and outstanding research requirements English Nature Research Reports working today for nature tomorrow English Nature Research Reports Number 543 Sabellaria spinulosa reef in The Wash and North Norfolk cSAC and its approaches: Part III, Summary of knowledge, recommended monitoring strategies and outstanding research requirements R.L. Foster-Smith and V.J. Hendrick Envision Mapping Ridley Building Newcastle University Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU March 2003 A report for the Eastern Sea Fisheries Joint Committee and English Nature Nominated Officer: Conor Donnelly You may reproduce as many additional copies of this report as you like, provided such copies stipulate that copyright remains with English Nature, Northminster House, Peterborough PE1 1UA ISSN 0967-876X © Copyright English Nature 2004 Contents 1. Introduction....................................................................................................................9 2. The Wash .......................................................................................................................9 2.1 The Wash, its conservation status and it’s uses.................................................9 2.2 Background to Wash surveys...........................................................................10 3. Sabellaria spinulosa – General review of the literature ..............................................12 3.1 Distribution......................................................................................................12 3.2 Biotope classification.......................................................................................12 3.3 Biology.............................................................................................................14 3.3.1 Reproduction and development ...........................................................14 Spawning..........................................................................................................14 Settlement.........................................................................................................14 Recruitment ......................................................................................................15 Growth.............................................................................................................15 Maturation........................................................................................................15 3.3.2 Reef development ................................................................................15 3.3.3 Longevity and temporal stability .........................................................16 3.3.4 Fragility................................................................................................16 3.4 Environmental requirements............................................................................17 3.4.1 Temperature.........................................................................................17 3.4.2 Depth....................................................................................................17 3.4.3 Suspended sediment / water movement ...............................................17 3.4.4 Substratum requirements......................................................................18 3.4.5 Salinity .................................................................................................18 3.5 Ecological functioning.....................................................................................18 3.5.1 Reef habitats.........................................................................................18 3.5.2 Associated species................................................................................18 3.5.3 Competitors and predators...................................................................19 3.5.4 Parasites ...............................................................................................19 3.6 Conservation and protection status..................................................................20 3.7 Sensitivity.........................................................................................................20 3.7.1 Sensitivity to natural events.................................................................20 3.7.2 Sensitivity to human activities.............................................................21 Fishing..............................................................................................................21 Aggregate extraction ........................................................................................22 Shoreline development.....................................................................................23 Water quality....................................................................................................23 Chemical contaminants....................................................................................24 4. Review of previous reports..........................................................................................24 4.1 1997 BMP survey.............................................................................................24 4.1.1 Data available.......................................................................................25 4.1.2 Summary of findings............................................................................25 4.2 1999 survey......................................................................................................25 4.2.1 Data available.......................................................................................26 4.2.2 Summary of findings............................................................................26 4.3 2000 survey......................................................................................................27 4.3.1 Data available.......................................................................................27 4.3.2 Summary of findings............................................................................29 4.4 2001 survey......................................................................................................30 4.4.1 Data available.......................................................................................30 4.4.2 Summary of findings............................................................................31 4.5 Summary of data available...............................................................................31 5. Summary of main outcomes from the SeaMap Wash reports.....................................31 5.1 Effective means of detection and sampling .....................................................32 5.1.1 Remote detection through acoustic technologies.................................32 Acoustic Ground Discrimination Systems (AGDS) ........................................32 Sidescan sonar..................................................................................................34 Swath bathymetric systems..............................................................................36 Novel technologies...........................................................................................36 5.1.2 Methods for sampling Sabellaria biotopes..........................................36 Video and digital cameras................................................................................36 Diver observation and sampling ......................................................................37 Grabs, dredges, trawls and infaunal analysis...................................................37 5.1.3 Summary ..............................................................................................38 5.2 Definition of ‘reef’ ...........................................................................................39 5.2.1 Association of S. spinulosa with sediment types.................................45 5.3 Spatial and temporal distribution of S. spinulosa within the Wash and its environs............................................................................................................46 5.3.1 Predicted distribution...........................................................................46 5.3.2 Point sample distribution .....................................................................47 5.3.3 Patchiness.............................................................................................48 5.3.4 Temporal stability ................................................................................50 5.3.5 Disturbance ..........................................................................................51 6. Conclusions on the status of S. spinulosa in the Wash and outstanding issues ...........52 6.1.1 Are reefs a distinct feature? .................................................................53 6.1.2 Are reefs relatively stable or very dynamic? .......................................53 6.1.3 How do reefs relate to other biotopes?.................................................53 6.1.4 How do reefs contribute to productivity and richness?........................54 6.1.5 What is the role of S. spinulosa (particularly reefs) biotopes in the wider ecosystem?.................................................................................54 6.1.6 Are there scales of long term stability given dynamism? ....................55 6.1.7 How should reefs
Load more

Recommended publications
  • UK Conservation Status Assessment for H1170
    European Community Directive on the Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora (92/43/EEC) Fourth Report by the United Kingdom under Article 17 on the implementation of the Directive from January 2013 to December 2018 Conservation status assessment for the habitat: H1170 ‐ Reefs UNITED KINGDOM IMPORTANT NOTE ‐ PLEASE READ • The information in this document represents the UK Report on the conservation status of this habitat, submitted to the European Commission as part of the 2019 UK Reporting under Article 17 of the EU Habitats Directive. • It is based on supporting information provided by the geographically‐relevant Statutory Nature Conservation Bodies, which is documented separately. • The 2019 Article 17 UK Approach document provides details on how this supporting information contributed to the UK Report and the fields that were completed for each parameter. • The reporting fields and options used are aligned to those set out in the European Com‐ mission guidance. • Maps showing the distribution and range of the habitat are included (where available). • Explanatory notes (where provided) are included at the end. These provide additional audit trail information to that included within the UK assessments. Further underpin‐ ning explanatory notes are available in the related country‐level and/or UK offshore‐ level reports. • Some of the reporting fields have been left blank because either: (i) there was insuf‐ ficient information to complete the field; and/or (ii) completion of the fieldwasnot obligatory. • The UK‐level reporting information for all habitats and species is also available in spread‐ sheet format. Visit the JNCC website, https://jncc.gov.uk/article17, for further information on UK Article 17 reporting.
    [Show full text]
  • The Status of Sabellaria Spinulosa Reef Off the Moray Firth and Aberdeenshire Coasts and Guidance for Conservation of the Species Off the Scottish East Coast
    The Status of Sabellaria spinulosa Reef off the Moray Firth and Aberdeenshire Coasts and Guidance for Conservation of the Species off the Scottish East Coast Research Summary Scottish Marine and Freshwater Science Vol 11 No 17 The Status of Sabellaria spinulosa Reef off the Moray Firth and Aberdeenshire Coasts and Guidance for Conservation of the Species off the Scottish East Coast B Pearce and J Kimber Introduction and Methodology Sabellaria spinulosa is a gregarious tube dwelling marine polychaete that is known to form extensive reef habitats across Europe. The reef habitats formed by S. spinulosa represent an important habitat for a variety of marine fauna and are thought to provide ecosystem services including the provision of feeding and nursery grounds for some fish species. S. spinulosa reefs have been identified as a priority for protection under the OSPAR Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North East Atlantic and Annex I of the Habitats Directive, in part due to the recognised decline in this habitat across Europe. Until recently, there was little evidence that this habitat occurred in Scottish waters. However, S. spinulosa aggregations with reef-like properties were observed repeatedly between 2011 and 2017 in seabed imagery collected through a variety of sources from the east coast of Scotland. The Scottish Government commissioned this research to assess the conservation status of the newly discovered S. spinulosa habitats and to develop guidance for the future management of this habitat on the east coast of Scotland. Video footage and still images collected from four surveys and ROV clips collected from a fifth, undertaken between 2011 and 2017 (Figure 1) were analysed comprehensively in accordance with established National Marine Biological Analytical Quality Control (NMBAQC) methodologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography of Coastal Worm-Reef and Tubeworm Species of the World (1950-2010)
    Centre National de la Recherche Scientique Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle Bibliography of Coastal Worm-Reef and Tubeworm Species of the World (1950-2010) Jer´ omeˆ Fournier Marine Biological Station Dinard This bibliographical list was compiled by Jérôme Fournier1. This list relates to the worm-reefs species and several tube-dwelling species of Annelidae and more particularly: • Ficopomatus enigmaticus (Fauvel, 1923) [Serpulidae], • Gunnarea gaimardi (Quatrefages, 1848) [Sabellariidae], • Idanthyrsus cretus Chamberlin, 1919 [Sabellariidae], • Idanthyrsus pennatus (Peters, 1854) [Sabellariidae], • Lanice conchilega (Pallas, 1766) [Terebellidae), • Lygdamis sp Kinberg, 1867 [Sabellariidae), • Owenia fusiformis Delle Chiaje, 1844 [Oweniidae), • Pectinaria gouldii (Verrill, 1874) [Pectinariidae], • Pectinaria granulata (Linnaeus, 1767) [Pectinariidae], • Pectinaria koreni (Malmgren, 1866) [Pectinariidae], • Phalacrostemma sp Marenzeller, 1895 [Sabellariidae), • Phragmatopoma caudata (Krøyer) Mörch, 1863 [Sabellariidae], • Phragmatopoma californica (Fewkes) Hartman, 1944 [Sabellariidae], • Phragmatopoma virgini Kinberg, 1866 [Sabellariidae], • Sabellaria alveolata (Linnaeus, 1767) [Sabellariidae], • Sabellaria spinulosa Leuckart, 1849 [Sabellariidae], • Serpula vermicularis Linnaeus, 1767 [Serpulidae]. We listed almost all the references in earth and life sciences relating to these species. We used the 'Web of Science' data base and the registers of the fol- lowing libraries: Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle (France) and University
    [Show full text]
  • Pandalus Jordani Range: Pink Shrimp Are Known to Inhabit Southeast
    Fishery-at-a-Glance: Pink (Ocean) Shrimp Scientific Name: Pandalus jordani Range: Pink Shrimp are known to inhabit Southeast Alaska to San Diego, California, and most abundant off the coast of Oregon. Habitat: Pink Shrimp dwell in deep waters,150 to 1,200 feet (45.7 to 365.8 meters), aggregating near the bottom during the day in well-defined areas of muddy habitat called beds and ascending into the water column at night to feed. Size (length and weight): Pink Shrimp are fast-growing. Individual growth rates vary by sex, location, year class, season, and age. Mean carapace length for 1-, 2-, and 3-year- old shrimp ranges from 0.5 to 0.7 inches (13 to 17 millimeters), 0.7 to 1.0 inches (18 to 25 millimeters), and 1.0 to 1.1 inches (25 to 29 millimeters), respectively. Life span: Pink Shrimp are short-lived at approximately 5 years. In California, few shrimp survive beyond the fourth year. Reproduction: Pink Shrimp are protandric hermaphrodites, changing sex from males to females after approximately the first year and a half. Mating occurs during September to October. Prey: Pink Shrimp feed on zooplankton, including copepods and krill. Stomach contents have also included diatoms, sponges, polychaetes, amphipods, and isopods. Predators: Many commercially important fish species, including Pacific Hake (Merluccius productus), Arrowtooth Flounder (Atheresthes stomia), Sablefish (Anoploploma fimbria), Petrale Sole (Eopsetta jordani), Spiny Dogfish (Squalus acanthias), and several species of rockfish and skates prey on Pink Shrimp. Fishery: There is only a commercial fishery for Pink Shrimp. Point Conception divides the northern and southern management regions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mediterranean Decapod and Stomatopod Crustacea in A
    ANNALES DU MUSEUM D'HISTOIRE NATURELLE DE NICE Tome V, 1977, pp. 37-88. THE MEDITERRANEAN DECAPOD AND STOMATOPOD CRUSTACEA IN A. RISSO'S PUBLISHED WORKS AND MANUSCRIPTS by L. B. HOLTHUIS Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie, Leiden, Netherlands CONTENTS Risso's 1841 and 1844 guides, which contain a simple unannotated list of Crustacea found near Nice. 1. Introduction 37 Most of Risso's descriptions are quite satisfactory 2. The importance and quality of Risso's carcino- and several species were figured by him. This caused logical work 38 that most of his names were immediately accepted by 3. List of Decapod and Stomatopod species in Risso's his contemporaries and a great number of them is dealt publications and manuscripts 40 with in handbooks like H. Milne Edwards (1834-1840) Penaeidea 40 "Histoire naturelle des Crustaces", and Heller's (1863) Stenopodidea 46 "Die Crustaceen des siidlichen Europa". This made that Caridea 46 Risso's names at present are widely accepted, and that Macrura Reptantia 55 his works are fundamental for a study of Mediterranean Anomura 58 Brachyura 62 Decapods. Stomatopoda 76 Although most of Risso's descriptions are readily 4. New genera proposed by Risso (published and recognizable, there is a number that have caused later unpublished) 76 authors much difficulty. In these cases the descriptions 5. List of Risso's manuscripts dealing with Decapod were not sufficiently complete or partly erroneous, and Stomatopod Crustacea 77 the names given by Risso were either interpreted in 6. Literature 7S different ways and so caused confusion, or were entirely ignored. It is a very fortunate circumstance that many of 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 109 Annotated Checklist Of
    THE RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2010 Supplement No. 23: 109–129 Date of Publication: 31 Oct.2010 © National University of Singapore ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF ANOMURAN DECAPOD CRUSTACEANS OF THE WORLD (EXCLUSIVE OF THE KIWAOIDEA AND FAMILIES CHIROSTYLIDAE AND GALATHEIDAE OF THE GALATHEOIDEA) PART II – PORCELLANIDAE Masayuki Osawa Research Center for Coastal Lagoon and Environments, Shimane University, 1060 Nishikawatsu-cho, Matsue, Shimane 690-8504, Japan Email: [email protected] Patsy A. McLaughlin Shannon Point Marine Center, Western Washington University, 1900 Shannon Point Road, Anacortes, WA 98221-4042, USA Email: hermit@fi dalgo.net INTRODUCTION Porcellanidae Haworth, 1825 = Porcellaniens H. Milne Edwards, 1837 Ng et al. (2008) and McLaughlin et al. (this volume) referred = Porcellaniadae Randall, 1840 to the “windows” to the literature and the “springboards” for = Porcellanodea Henderson 1888 associating species with their scientifi c names that provided = Porcellainea Holmes, 1900 the foundations for subsequent brachyuran, paguroid and lithodoid research. For the porcellanids, one treatise in particular has provided a similar base upon which virtually all DESCRIPTIVE TERMS AND CURRENT STATUS subsequent porcellanid reports have been patterned. Despite its regional focus, Haig’s (1960) monograph of eastern General morphology. – The general body shape is crab- Pacifi c species included 87 of the 225 species estimated to like and the carapace is well calcifi ed. Regions of the dorsal be present worldwide at the time (Chace, 1951). During the integument are not usually well defi ned. The anterior margin last half century the number of genera has increased from of the carapace is produced into a short rostrum or rostral 14 prior to Haig’s (1960) monograph to 30 and the number lobe.
    [Show full text]
  • Role of Reef-Building, Ecosystem Engineering Polychaetes in Shallow Water Ecosystems
    diversity Review Role of Reef-Building, Ecosystem Engineering Polychaetes in Shallow Water Ecosystems Martín Bruschetti 1,2 1 Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras (IIMyC)-CONICET, Mar del Plata 7600, Argentina; [email protected] 2 Laboratorio de Ecología, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, FCEyN, Laboratorio de Ecología 7600, Argentina Received: 15 June 2019; Accepted: 15 September 2019; Published: 17 September 2019 Abstract: Although the effect of ecosystem engineers in structuring communities is common in several systems, it is seldom as evident as in shallow marine soft-bottoms. These systems lack abiotic three-dimensional structures but host biogenic structures that play critical roles in controlling abiotic conditions and resources. Here I review how reef-building polychaetes (RBP) engineer their environment and affect habitat quality, thus regulating community structure, ecosystem functioning, and the provision of ecosystem services in shallow waters. The analysis focuses on different engineering mechanisms, such as hard substrate production, effects on hydrodynamics, and sediment transport, and impacts mediated by filter feeding and biodeposition. Finally, I deal with landscape-level topographic alteration by RBP. In conclusion, RBP have positive impacts on diversity and abundance of many species mediated by the structure of the reef. Additionally, by feeding on phytoplankton and decreasing water turbidity, RBP can control primary production, increase light penetration, and might alleviate the effects of eutrophication
    [Show full text]
  • Seasonal Variation in Community Structure and Recruitment of Benthic Decapods in a Sub-Tidal Cobble Habitat
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 206: 181–191, 2000 Published November 3 Mar Ecol Prog Ser Seasonal variation in community structure and recruitment of benthic decapods in a sub-tidal cobble habitat Martin Robinson*, Oliver Tully Department of Zoology, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland ABSTRACT: Quantitative suction samples of benthic decapod fauna were taken in the south of Ireland during 1997. Some species settled into the area, but failed to persist to the first winter, while others were present in high numbers throughout the year. The duration of settlement was species- specific, ranging from several weeks to several months. Body size at settlement decreased with increasing temperature during larval development. Growth potential and early mortality of a number of decapod species was examined by separation of successive moult instars from length-frequency distributions. Seasonal lows in abundance and biomass of young of the year and for previously estab- lished decapod individuals were identified at the end of July and early August, which may represent the most suitable time to release juveniles for stock-enhancement purposes. Community structure differed between settlement season and over-wintering periods. Young-of-the-year community structure differed from that of previously established individuals, with higher abundance and num- ber of species recorded for the former. The data represent a baseline study of a widely distributed community and may support further work on species interactions, improving the accuracy of predic- tion of annual recruitment fluctuations. KEY WORDS: Community · Decapod · Recruitment · Seasonal variation Resale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisher INTRODUCTION strong 1995, Pile et al.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, Vol19, Part 3
    Volume 19. Part 3. 28$. May, 1962 pp. 129-192. THE BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGICAL NOMENCLATURE The Official Organ of THE INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON ZOOLOGICAL NOMENCLATURE Contents Page Notices prescribed by the International Congress of Zoology : Date of commencement by the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature of voting on applications published in the Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature 129 Notice of the possible use by the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature of its plenary powers in certain cases 129 (icontinued inside back wrapper) LONDON: Printed by Order of the International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature and Sold on behalf of the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature by the International Trust at its Publications Office, 19, Belgrave Square, London, S.W.I 1962 Price Three Pounds (All rights reserved) Original from and digitized by National University of Singapore Libraries INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON ZOOLOGICAL NOMENCLATURE A. The Officers of the Commission President-. Professor James Chester Bradley (Cornell University, Ithaca, N.T., U.S.A.) (12 August 1953) Vice-President: Senhor Dr. Afranio do Amaral (Sao Paulo, Brazil) (12 August 1953) Secretary: Mr. N. D. Riley (British Museum (Natural History), London) (23 July 1958) Assistant Secretary: Dr. W. E. China (British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road, London, S.W. 7) B. The Members of the Commission (Arranged in order of precedence by reference to date of election or of most recent re-election, as prescribed by the International Congress of Zoology) Senhor Dr. Afranio do Amakal (S. Paulo, Brazil) (12 August 1953) (Vice-President) Professor J. Chester Bradley (Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y., U.S.A.) (12 August 1953) (President) Professor Harold E.
    [Show full text]
  • Efeitos Das Mudanças Climáticas Em Poliquetas Construtores De Recifes: Modelagem De Distribuição De Espécies, Bioconstrução, E Ecofisiologia
    Larisse Faroni-Perez EFEITOS DAS MUDANÇAS CLIMÁTICAS EM POLIQUETAS CONSTRUTORES DE RECIFES: MODELAGEM DE DISTRIBUIÇÃO DE ESPÉCIES, BIOCONSTRUÇÃO, E ECOFISIOLOGIA “EFFECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON REEF-BUILDING POLYCHAETES: SPECIES DISTRIBUTION MODELLING, BIOCONSTRUCTION, AND ECOPHYSIOLOGY” Tese submetida ao Programa de Pós- Graduação em Ecologia da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina para a obtenção do Grau de Doutora em Ecologia Orientador: Prof. Dr. Carlos Frederico Deluqui Gurgel. Florianópolis, SC - Brasil 2017 Ficha de identificação da obra elaborada pelo autor, através do Programa de Geração Automática da Biblioteca Universitária da UFSC. Faroni-Perez, Larisse Efeitos das mudanças climáticas em poliquetas construtores de recifes: modelagem de distribuição de espécies, bioconstrução e ecofisiologia : Effects of climate change on reef-building polychaetes: species distribution modelling, bioconstruction, and ecophysiology / Larisse Faroni-Perez ; orientador, Carlos Frederico Deluqui Gurgel, 2017. 266 p. Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Centro de Ciências Biológicas, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia, Florianópolis, 2017. Inclui referências. 1. Ecologia. 2. Acidificação dos Oceanos. 3. Biodiversidade Marinha. 4. Mudanças Globais. 5. Zona Costeira. I. Gurgel, Carlos Frederico Deluqui . II. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia. III. Título. Este trabalho é dedicado aos meus pais: Amabele e Pedro. AGRADECIMENTOS Ao Ministério da Educação (MEC) e Ministério da Ciência,
    [Show full text]
  • Crustacean Fauna of a Mussel Cultivated Raft System in the Black Sea
    Arthropods, 2013, 2(2): 89-94 Article Crustacean fauna of a mussel cultivated raft system in the Black Sea Murat Sezgin, Eylem Aydemir Çil Sinop University Faculty of Fisheries Department of Marine Biology and Ecology TR57000 Sinop, Turkey E-mail: [email protected] Received 1 January 2013; Accepted 5 February 2013; Published online 1 June 2013 Abstract The aim of the current study was to make a faunistic analysis of the crustaceans associated with cultivated mussels grown on ropes. Mussel samples from 30 cm ropes were collected from rope-grown mussel beds by hand. The crustacean fauna associated with mussel population were quantified. The density of crustacean fauna associated with mussels was significantly greater within rope-grown mussel assemblages than on other biotopes around. Keywords Crustacea; Mytilus galloprovincialis; raft culture; rope-grown mussels; species richness. Arthropods ISSN 2224­4255 URL: http://www.iaees.org/publications/journals/arthropods/online­version.asp RSS: http://www.iaees.org/publications/journals/arthropods/rss.xml E­mail: [email protected] Editor­in­Chief: WenJun Zhang Publisher: International Academy of Ecology and Environmental Sciences 1 Introduction A few species of Bivalvia in Black Sea live on hard substrate: the mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis fasten themselves with bissal threads to underwater stones, macroalgal stems or pier columns as nature habitats. The biodiversity associated with cultivated mussel assemblages depends partly on the source of the mussels and on the new habitat created by the method of cultivation. To date, no study has been made of the macrofauna associated with mussels in the habitats created by different methods of mussel cultivation in the Black Sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification Guide to the Planktonic Polychaete Larvae Around the Island of Helgoland (German Bight)
    HELGOL.~NDER MEERESUNTERSUCHUNGEN Helgol/inder Meeresunters. 48, 1-58 (1994) Identification guide to the planktonic polychaete larvae around the island of Helgoland (German Bight) S. Plate* & E. Husemann* * Biologische Anstalt Helgoland (Meeresstation); D-27483 Helgoland, Federal Republic of Germany ABSTRACT: The purpose of this work is to provide the means of identifying the planktonic larvae of the polychaete species appearing in the plankton around the island of Helgoland (North Sea). During a three-year survey in this area, the larvae of 54 species out of 24 families belonging to the orders Orbiniida, Spionida, Capitelhda, Phyllodocida, Oweniida, Terebelhda, Sabelhda and the former Archiannelida have been recorded. Illustrated keys to the families, genera and species are presented. To facilitate the identification, additional descriptions and information about the seasonal appearance of the species are given. INTRODUCTION More than 13 000 species of polychaetous annelids take part in the marine benthos communities worldwide. Their distribution, species composition and population density are monitored within various benthos surveys. For the North Sea, especially the German Bight and the Wadden Sea, much information about the benthic polychaete fauna is available (Caspers, 1950; Stripp, 1969; DSrjes, 1977; Rachor & Gerlach, 1978; Gillandt, 1979; Salzwedel et al., 1985; Rachor, 1990; Bosselmann, 1991; Kr6ncke, 1991). In contrast, the holoplanktonic polychaete species and the meroplanktonic polychaete larvae, which are only part of the plankton during a more or less expanded phase of their ontogenesis, have never received much attention. Meroplanktonic polychaete larvae are seldomly recorded during studies monitoring the North Sea plankton (Smidt, 1951; Giere, 1968; Fransz, 1981; Bosselmann, 1989; Belgrano et al., 1990).
    [Show full text]