DOCSLIB.ORG

PC Minutes 071011

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PC Minutes 071011 Broads Authority Planning Committee Minutes of the meeting held on 7 October 2011 Present: Mr M Barnard Mr C Gould Mrs J Brociek-Coulton Mr G W Jermany Mr N Dixon Dr J S Johnson Mr S Dorrington Mr A S Mallett Dr J M Gray Mr R Stevens In Attendance: Mrs S A Beckett – Administrative Officer Mr C Brown– for the Solicitor Mr F Bootman – Planning Officer Ms M Hammond – Planning Assistant Mr B Hogg – Historic Environment Manager Ms A Macnab – Planning Officer Mr A Scales – Planning Officer (NPS Consultants) Ms C Smith – Head of Development Management Ms K Wood – Planning Assistant Members of the public in attendance who spoke: BA/2011/0236/FUL Dockyard, Griffin Lane, Thorpe St Andrew, Norwich Mr Phillip Duncan Agent on behalf of applicant Corylus Ltd. Rob Rogers On behalf of Applicant Ms Trudi Wakelin BA/2011/0244/FUL Compartment 1, River Bank of River Bure Upstream of Upton Mill and Adj to Upton Boat Dyke, Upton Mr Jeremy Halls (BESL) On behalf of Applicant BA/2011/0260/FUL Compartment 12, Reedham to Cantley Floodbank, River Yare Mr Jeremy Halls (BESL) On behalf of Applicant BA/0262/FUL Compartments 10 and 11, Riverbank of River Bure between Stokesby and Great Yarmouth Mr Jeremy Halls (BESL) On behalf of Applicant BA/2011/0223/CU Amusement Arcade, Norwich Road, Hoveton Mr M Grey Applicant Mrs J Brandford Resident SAB/RG/mins/pc071011/p1of30/251011 BA/2011/0257/FUL Lime Kiln Quay, Irstead Road, Neatishead Mr M Powell Applicant BA/2011/0243/FUL Cantley Marshes, Cantley Ms A Kelly On behalf of applicant 1/1 Apologies for Absence and Welcome The Chief Executive welcomed everyone to the meeting. Apologies for absence were received from Mrs S Blane and Mr N Dixon who would be arriving late due to prior commitments. 1/2 Appointment of Chairman The Chief Executive invited nominations for the Chairman of the Committee. It was proposed and duly seconded that Dr J M Gray be appointed as Chairman. RESOLVED that Dr Gray be appointed as Chairman of the Planning Committee for the forthcoming year. Dr Gray in the Chair 1/3 Appointment of Vice-Chairman It was proposed and duly seconded that Mr Gould be appointed as Vice- Chairman. RESOLVED that Mr Gould be appointed as Vice-Chairman of the Planning Committee for the forthcoming year. 1/4 Declarations of Interest Members expressed declarations of interest as set out in Appendix 1 to these minutes. 1/5 Minutes The minutes of the meeting held on 9 September were confirmed as a correct record and signed by the Chairman subject to an amendment to Appendix 1 Declarations of Interest for Mr A S Mallett having a personal interest for Minute 13/8 (4) and prejudicial interest for item 13/11 (i). SAB/RG/mins/pc071011/p2of30/251011 1/6 Points of Information Arising from the Minutes There were no points of information arising from the minutes to report. 1/7 To note whether any items have been proposed as matters of urgent business There were no items of urgent business. 1/8 Chairman’s Announcements and Introduction to Public Speaking (1) The Chairman gave notice of the Fire Regulations. (2) Public Speaking The Chairman reminded everyone that the scheme for public speaking was in operation for consideration of planning applications, details of which were contained in the Code of Conduct for Members and Officers. Those who wished to speak were requested to come up to the public speaking desk at the beginning of the presentation of the relevant application. (3) Variation in the Order of the Agenda The Chairman proposed to rearrange the order of business by taking application BA/2011/0292/FUL of agenda item 10 first. In addition it was agreed to take agenda item18 Wayford Mill following consideration of all the applications in order to ensure that all members were available for its consideration. 1/9 Requests to Defer Applications Included in this Agenda No requests for deferral of applications had been received. 1/10 Applications for Planning Permission The Committee considered applications submitted under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, as well as matters of enforcement (also having regard to Human Rights), and reached decisions as set out in Appendix 2 to these minutes on the blue pages. Acting under its delegated powers the Committee authorised the immediate implementation of the decisions. The following minutes relate to further matters of information, or detailed matters of policy not already covered in the officers‟ reports, and which were given additional attention. SAB/RG/mins/pc071011/p3of30/251011 (1) BA/2011/0236/FUL Dockyard, Griffin Lane, Thorpe St Andrew, Norwich Removal of various existing buildings and relocation of access/associated boundary treatment. Extension to existing workshop with additional boat shed/workshop, first floor office and welfare facilities. New police launch shed and new inlet. Removal of one existing slip and associated new piling; new aggregate bays; and associated works Applicant: Land and Water The Planning Officer explained that the proposal was at the long established Thorpe Dockyard on land owned and operated as a Dockyard by the Authority. The application was submitted by Land and Water who would occupy the proposed office in partnership with the Authority. The proposals followed on from previous applications granted temporary permission in May 2011 and the desire for more permanent buildings and enhancement of the site. The application represented part of the Authority‟s review of its operations which sought to tidy the area, provide new facilities, provide an area for car parking and rationalise the buildings to enable a more efficient operation of the whole site. An application submitted in July had been withdrawn due to the height and size of the proposed building not being sufficient to accommodate the operational needs of the workshop. The current proposal had been developed to accommodate those needs and the resulting extended portion of the building would be 2.1 metres taller than the current workshop. Photomontages were shown. The Planning Officer drew attention to the comments received explaining that those in italics represented comments on the withdrawn application. However, the Broads Society had since confirmed that it had no objections and had indicated its positive support. The Environment Agency had provisionally supported the proposals considering them to be appropriate and water compatible for this location subject to mitigation measures for Flood Risk; no objections had been received from the Internal Drainage Board, and the Highways Authority had no objections, their concern being mainly with the junction of Griffin Lane with Yarmouth Road (A1242). The Planning Officer explained that the plans addressed many of the concerns expressed previously. The new facilities would provide a rationalisation of an existing activity and there was operational justification for the height of the proposed building. It was also recognised that there had been a mixture of buildings on the site previously and that the character was similar to other sites in the vicinity. However, officers had concerns about the bulk and mass of the building and further negotiations were required to finalise details of the building. Therefore officers recommended that the application be approved in principle subject to further satisfactory amendments being made, particularly relating to the eaves height and roof pitch, and that the application be brought back to the next meeting. SAB/RG/mins/pc071011/p4of30/251011 Mr Duncan, on behalf of the applicant, was given the opportunity to address the Committee explaining that Land and Water Ltd were a specialist marine engineering company wishing to establish itself within the Broads and employ local people. It would be sharing the office space with the Authority. He considered that the company had gone a considerable way to address the operational needs of the Authority and the concerns of the planning officers to soften the appearance, already providing a compromise. The height was in part due to the need to make the building DDA (Disability Discrimination Act) compliant and provide a lift as well as the workshop facilities. He emphasised that, in essence, the proposals were for an industrial building in an industrial area. The timing of a decision was critical in order to secure the necessary funding and therefore he requested that a decision be made at this meeting. In general, members did not consider it appropriate to approve the application in principle at this stage and accordingly they wished to approve the detailed scheme when finalised. Therefore they considered that the application should be deferred for further negotiations in an attempt to achieve a more acceptable design. A member suggested that the application be deferred until the end of the meeting to enable the relevant officers to carry out further negotiations and assist in the timing of the development, but this was not supported. Members also considered whether to delegate a decision to the Chairman and Vice-Chairman of the Planning Committee subject to satisfactory negotiations. Although recognising the pressures in relation to funding and the operational requirements, it was important that the planning matters were given full consideration in an appropriate way. Dr Johnson proposed, seconded by Mr Barnard and it was RESOLVED by 5 votes to 1 with one abstention that the application be deferred to the next Planning Committee meeting on 4 November 2011 for officers to have further negotiations with the applicant on design, particularly relating to the eaves height of the main building and extension in an attempt to reduce the mass and bulk of the proposals without affecting their functionality. (2) BA/2011/0244/FUL Compartment 1, River Bank of River Bure Upstream of Upton Mill and Adjacent to Upton Dyke Boat Yard, Upton Rollback of 250m length of floodbank following piling removal.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Norfolk Local Flood Risk Management Strategy
    Appendix A Norfolk Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Consultation Draft March 2015 1 Blank 2 Part One - Flooding and Flood Risk Management Contents PART ONE – FLOODING AND FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT ..................... 5 1. Introduction ..................................................................................... 5 2 What Is Flooding? ........................................................................... 8 3. What is Flood Risk? ...................................................................... 10 4. What are the sources of flooding? ................................................ 13 5. Sources of Local Flood Risk ......................................................... 14 6. Sources of Strategic Flood Risk .................................................... 17 7. Flood Risk Management ............................................................... 19 8. Flood Risk Management Authorities ............................................. 22 PART TWO – FLOOD RISK IN NORFOLK .................................................. 30 9. Flood Risk in Norfolk ..................................................................... 30 Flood Risk in Your Area ................................................................ 39 10. Broadland District .......................................................................... 39 11. Breckland District .......................................................................... 45 12. Great Yarmouth Borough .............................................................. 51 13. Borough of King’s
    [Show full text]
  • Appropriate Assessment (Submission)
    June 2007 North Norfolk District Council Planning Policy Team Telephone: 01263 516318 E-Mail: [email protected] Write to: Jill Fisher, Planning Policy Manager, North Norfolk District Council, Holt Road, Cromer, NR27 9EN www.northnorfolk.org/ldf All of the LDF Documents can be made available in Braille, large print or in other languages. Please contact 01263 516321 to discuss your requirements. Core Strategy Appropriate Assessment (Submission) Contents 1 Introduction 4 2 The Appropriate Assessment Process 4 3 Consultation and Preparation 5 4 Evidence gathering for the Appropriate Assessment 6 European sites that may be affected 6 Characteristics and conservation objectives of the European sites 8 Other relevant plans or projects 25 5 Appropriate Assessment and Plan analysis 28 Tables Table 4.1 - Broadland SPA/SAC qualifying features 9 Table 4.2 - Great Yarmouth North Denes SPA/SAC 12 Table 4.3 - North Norfolk Coast SPA/SAC qualifying features 15 Table 4.4 - Norfolk Valley Fens SAC qualifying features 19 Table 4.5 - Overstrand Cliffs SAC qualifying features 21 Table 4.6 - Paston Great Barn SAC qualifying features 23 Table 4.7 - River Wensum SAC qualifying features 24 Table 4.8 - Neighbouring districts Core Strategy progress table 27 Table 5.1 - Screening for likely significant effects 29 Table 5.2 - Details of Settlements in policies SS1, SS3, SS5 and SS7 to SS14 and how policy amendments have resulted in no likely significant effects being identified 35 Maps Map 4.1 - Environmental Designations 7 Map 4.2 - Broadland Environmental
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Regulations Assessment: Breckland Council Submission Core Strategy and Development Control Policies
    Habitats Regulation Assessment of the Site Specific Allocations & Policies Document, Wymondham Area Action Plan, Long Stratton Area Action Plan and Cringleford Neighbourhood Development Plan, undertaken for South Norfolk Council October 2013 Natural Environment Team HRA of Site Allocations Document, Wymondham AAP, Long Stratton AAP and Cringleford Neighbourhood Plan for South Norfolk Council October 2013 Habitats Regulation Assessment of the Site Specific Allocations and Policies Document, the Wymondham Area Action Plan, the Long Stratton Area Action Plan and the Cringleford Neighbourhood Development Plan Executive Summary As required by the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010, before deciding to give consent or permission for a plan or project which is likely to have a significant effect on a European site, either alone or in combination with other plans or projects, the competent authority is required to make an appropriate assessment of the implications for that site in view of that site’s conservation objectives. This document is a record of the Habitats Regulation Assessment of the Sites Allocation Document, undertaken for South Norfolk Council. Additionally, proposed development at Wymondham, as described in the emerging Wymondham Area Action Plan, at Long Stratton, as described in the emerging Long Stratton Area Action Plan and proposed housing in the parish of Cringleford, guided by the emerging Cringleford Draft Neighbourhood Plan, are assessed Three groups of plans are reviewed with respect to their conclusions with respect to potential in-combination effects. These are plans for The Greater Norwich Development Partnership, Great Yarmouth Borough Council, Breckland District Council, and The Broads Authority including local development plans and the Tourism Strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitats Regulations Assessment of the South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan
    Habitats Regulations Assessment of the South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan Regulation 18 HRA Report May 2021 Habitats Regulations Assessment of the South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan Regulation 18 HRA Report LC- 654 Document Control Box Client South Norfolk Council Habitats Regulations Assessment Report Title Regulation 18 – HRA Report Status FINAL Filename LC-654_South Norfolk_Regulation 18_HRA Report_8_140521SC.docx Date May 2021 Author SC Reviewed ND Approved ND Photo: Female broad bodied chaser by Shutterstock Regulation 18 – HRA Report May 2021 LC-654_South Norfolk_Regulation 18_HRA Report_8_140521SC.docx Contents 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose of this report ............................................................................................................................................... 1 2 The South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan ................................................................... 3 2.1 Greater Norwich Local Plan .................................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan ................................................................................ 3 2.3 Village Clusters ..........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm Appendix 22.14 Norfolk Vanguard Onshore Ecology Consultation Responses
    Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm Appendix 22.14 Norfolk Vanguard Onshore Ecology Consultation Responses Preliminary Environmental Information Report Volume 3 Author: Royal HaskoningDHV Applicant: Norfolk Boreas Limited Document Reference: PB5640-005-2214 Date: October 2018 Photo: Ormonde Offshore Wind Farm Date Issue Remarks / Reason for Issue Author Checked Approved No. 20/07/18 01D First draft for Norfolk Boreas Limited review GC CD DT 20/09/18 01F Final for PEIR submission GC CD AD/JL Preliminary Environmental Information Report Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm PB5640-005-2214 October 2018 Page i Table of Contents 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 2 Consultation responses Norfolk Vanguard ............................................................... 1 3 References ........................................................................................................... 27 Preliminary Environmental Information Report Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm PB5640-005-2214 October 2018 Page ii Tables Table 2.1 Norfolk Vanguard Consultation Responses 2 Preliminary Environmental Information Report Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm PB5640-005-2214 October 2018 Page iii Glossary of Acronyms CoCP Code of Construction Practice DCO Development Consent Order EIA Environmental Impact Assessment ES Environmental Statement ETG Expert Topic Group HVAC High Voltage Alternating Current HVDC High Voltage Direct Current PEIR Preliminary Environmental Information Report SoS Secretary of State Preliminary Environmental Information Report Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm PB5640-005-2214 October 2018 Page iv This page is intentionally blank. Preliminary Environmental Information Report Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm PB5640-005-2214 October 2018 Page v 1 Introduction 1. Consultation is a key driver of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process, and throughout the lifecycle of the project, from the initial stages through to consent and post-consent. 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Action Plan
    BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN April 2018 BROADS IDB – BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN Front cover images (L-R) Marsh Harrier ©Artur Rydzewski; Norfolk Hawker © Milo Bostock; Water Soldier; Water Vole; Berney Marshes ©Mike Page; BIDB Digger BROADS IDB – BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN FOREWORD This Biodiversity Action Plan (Second Edition) has been prepared by the Broads Internal Drainage Board in accordance with the commitment in the Implementation Plan of the DEFRA Internal Drainage Board Review for IDB’s, to produce their own Biodiversity Action Plans by April 2010. As such, the original version was published in January 2010. This revised version aims to continue to align the Broads IDB with biodiversity policy and more specifically, the Biodiversity document for England, “Biodiversity 2020: A strategy for Englands’ Wildlife and Ecosystem Services” and build on the Government’s 25 Year Environmental Plan; A Green Future. In doing so, the document strives to demonstrate the Board’s commitment to fulfilling its duty as a public body under the Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006 to conserve biodiversity. Many of the Board’s activities have benefits and opportunities for biodiversity, not least its water level management and watercourse maintenance work. It is hoped that this Biodiversity Action Plan will help the Board to maximise the biodiversity benefits from its activities and demonstrate its contribution to the targets as part of the Biodiversity 2020 strategy and achieve wider environmental improvement within its catchments. The Board has adopted the Biodiversity Action Plan as one of its policies and subject to available resources is committed to its implementation. It will review the plan periodically and update it as appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitats Regulations Assessment: Draft Scoping Report
    North Norfolk 2016 - 2036 HABITATS REGULATIONS ASSESSMENT Draft Scoping Report May 2017 North Norfolk District Council Planning Policy Team Telephone: 01263 516318 E-Mail: [email protected] Write to: Planning Policy Manager, North Norfolk District Council, Holt Road, Cromer, NR27 9EN www.north-norfolk.gov.uk/localplan All documents can be made available in Braille, audio, large print or in other languages. Please contact 01263 516318 to discuss your requirements. Draft HRA Scoping - North Norfolk District Council – Emerging Local Plan Executive Summary Habitats Regulations Assessment is required in accordance with the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010, (amended 2012); in order to ensure that plans and projects do not have a likely significant effect on any European designated sites for nature conservation. Such plans or projects can only proceed if the competent authority is convinced they will not have an “adverse effect on the integrity of a European site”. Where there is uncertainty over the effects then the competent authority will need to demonstrate how these can be avoided and what mitigation can be put in place. A Local Plan is the subject of Habitats Regulations Assessment, which is the responsibility of the plan-making body (in this case North Norfolk District Council) to produce. This scoping report provides the background and review of evidence to support the commencement of screening and the final Habitats Regulations Assessment of the North Norfolk Core Strategy and Site Allocations documents. This report considers: • The European designated sites within and outside the plan area affected. • The characteristics of these sites and their conservation objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • The Eastern Counties, — ——
    ^^^^^ gh Guides : ——- h^ ==h* - c\J : :ct> r ^c\i ==^JQO - T— ""> h»- [~^co '-_ 7 —^^— :n UOUNTIES /t\u* ton ^¥/ua( vY "IP Grantham ' TaUdngh oihv Mort.ml l y'iii.oco..^i>s ^u , ! v , ^i,,:;;^ , i / v '"'''.v/,,. ;r~ nsiimV *\ ?. ' kXOton /lEICESTERY Monftw /{, r fontf* k ^> h'i .;-"" A0% .-O Krlmarsh\ Blisw.wfli.i2 'oad&J Eelmdon. "VTolvei J''u/<}, upthill r9tc Ami? LoAviibo- 'Widfc *Baldock effbhurn f J Marti}*?' Ihxatingfard eitfktoii 7 " gifzzarcL t^r ' t>un.sti ^OXFORD '/'> Ainershain. finest WytHtrnd^iL Bickuuuis>^ Watliagtnti >^Hi^TV^cHnb£ ^M Shxplake- jfe-wrffa^eR E A PI Nla ^ | J. Bartholomew", E3ix k 4t> fcs J«<00®»»®00 o ocoo iO>l>Ot>l>N0500 o o t-o •0000500^000 OOO o ft ,'rH0D»O0006Q0CMlO>LO H00«3 . o CD Ocp CO COO O O OOCOO ^•OOOOOOOOO o o o o Q 5 m taWOWOOOCO>OiO •io»oo>o CO rHrHrHrHi-HrHrHrHrH . rH rH rH rH ^•COOOOOOOOO _CO O O 3 ojlOrHOrHrHrHGOOO :* :'i>ho 3 rHrH<MrHrHt-lr-l<M<M . • rH rH <M O ft . ocococococoococo CO CO CO CO 3 • t» d- t~ i>- rH (MH^HHHIMiMN • <M <M rH <M •oooomooojohoiooo ^5 rH oJcO<NO<M^<MCOOOOOOCO<MO rHrHCQrHr-1 rHrHrH<MrH(MrHrH<M IrHOCOOOOOCOCOCO 00 O CO 'oo r3 :C5000^ocooooocooo o o Q 525 : oq : : : :§? : : : : : O a OQ r-4 : o • : : :^3 : : : : * a a o 3 O : : : : : : : : : : « : a ^ ft .ft .o • n • o3 • o •J25 o9 S • 0) cS . CO . :oq • :,3 : B :ra : flo -»j cS rQ 2 s.d tJD ? B fcr - 00 O ?+3 J* ^b-3 a p 5 3 8.5 g^ - » * +•+* * * H—H— -r-+-»-+-f-+* * +-+ * * -f--r- Tast.
    [Show full text]
  • The Norfolk & Norwich
    L c£H£RAl * 3 may ,*,UBRARY^ x TRANSACTIONS OF THE NORFOLK & NORWICH NATURALISTS’ SOCIETY Vol. 24 PART 4 APRIL 1978 ISBN 0375 7226 : : OFFICERS OF THE SOCIETY 1977-78 President: Ms D. M. Maxey ‘Greenfields’, Swanton Road, Dereham. President-Elect Mr P. J. Trett Victoria Road, Great Yarmouth Vice-Presidents: P. R. Banham, A. Bull, K. B. Clarke, E. T. Daniels, K. C. Durrant, E. A. Ellis, R. Jones, M. J. Seago, J. A. Steers, E. L. Swann, F. J. Taylor-Page General Secretary: R. E. Baker 25 Southern Reach, Mulbarton, NR14 8BU Tel. Mulbarton 70609 Assistant Secretary: (Membership and Publications) Ms J. Wakefield Post Office Lane, Saxthorpe, NR 11 7BL Assistant Secretary: (Minutes) P. W. Lambley Castle Museum, Norwich Excursion Secretary: Ms J. Robinson 5 Southern Reach, Mulbarton NR14 8BU Tel. Mulbarton 70576 Treasurer: D. A. Dorling St. Edmundsbury, 6 New Road, Hethersett Tel. Norwich 810318 Assistant Secretary: J. E. Timbers The Nook, Barford, Norfolk Editor: E. A. Ellis Wheatfen Broad, Surlingham, Norwich Auditor: E. L. Swann 282 Wootton Road, King’s Lynn, Norfolk Committee: M. J. Baker, G. Dunmore, Dr A. Davy (University Representative) Dr S. Cole, Ms C. Gurney, G. Hart, R. Hancy, P. W. Lambley (Museum Representative), J. Secker, Ms J. Smith, P. M. C. Stevens (Norfolk Naturalists’ Trust), P. Wright (Nature Conservancy Representative). ORGANISERS OF PRINCIPAL SPECIALIST GROUPS Birds {Editor of the Report) M. J. Seago, 33 Accacia Road, Thorpe, Norwich Mammals (Editor of the Report) R. Hancy, 124 Fakenham Road, Taverham NR8 6QH Plants: P. W. Lambley and E. L. Swann Fungi: E.
    [Show full text]
  • Delineation of the MIKE 11 River Glaven Channel and Location of Cross-Sections
    HYDROECOLOGICAL MONITORING AND MODELLING OF RIVER-FLOODPLAIN RESTORATION IN A UK LOWLAND RIVER MEADOW By Hannah Marie Clilverd UCL A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 1 SIGNED DECLARATION I, Hannah Marie Clilverd confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. 2 ABSTRACT Channelization and embankment of rivers has led to major ecological degradation of aquatic habitats worldwide. River restoration can be used to restore favourable hydrological conditions for target processes or species. This study is based on rarely available, detailed pre- and post-restoration hydrological data collected from 2007–2010 from a wet grassland meadow in Norfolk, UK. Based on these data, coupled hydrological/hydraulic models were developed of pre-embankment and post-embankment conditions using the MIKE-SHE/MIKE-11 system. Fine-scale plant and chemical sampling was conducted on the floodplain meadow to assess the spatial pattern of plant communities in relation to soil physicochemical conditions. Simulated groundwater levels for a 10-year period were then used to predict changes in plant community composition following embankment-removal. Hydrology was identified as the primary driver of plant community composition, while soil fertility was also important. Embankment removal resulted in widespread floodplain inundation at high river flows and frequent localised flooding at the river edge at lower flows. Subsequently, groundwater levels were higher and subsurface storage was greater. The restoration had a moderate effect on flood-peak attenuation and improved free drainage to the river.
    [Show full text]
  • Anglian Water 2015 Water Resource Management Plan
    Anglian Water 2015 Water Resource Management Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment: Task 1 & 2 December 2013 Error! No text of specified style in document. Anglian Water 2015 Water Resources Management Plan 313903 EVT EES 003 C http://pims01/pims/llisapi.dll/properties/1547572395 04 December 2013 Habitats Regulations Assessment: Task 1 & 2 Anglian Water 2014 Water Resources Management Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment: Task 1 & 2 December 2013 Mott MacDonald, Demeter House, Station Road, Cambridge CB1 2RS, United Kingdom T +44 (0)1223 463500 F +44 (0)1223 461007 W www.mottmac.com Anglian Water 2015 Water Resource Management Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment: Task 1 & 2 Issue and revision record Revision Date Originator Checker Approver Description Standard A 16 October 2013 Tristan Folland Zoe Trent N Levy Draft for comments Roisin Ni Celia Figueira Mhathuna B 27 November 2013 Tristan Folland Laura N Levy Final draft for comments Celia Figueira Henderson C 04 December 2013 Tristan Folland Laura N Levy Final for Submission Celia Figueira Henderson This document is issued for the party which commissioned it and We accept no responsibility for the consequences of this for specific purposes connected with the above-captioned project document being relied upon by any other party, or being used only. It should not be relied upon by any other party or used for for any other purpose, or containing any error or omission any other purpose. which is due to an error or omission in data supplied to us by other parties. This document contains confidential information and proprietary intellectual property. It should not be shown to other parties without consent from us and from the party which commissioned it.
    [Show full text]
  • Enjoy the Broads
    Enjoy the Broads 2016 The Broads is Britain’s magical waterland, a uniquely beautiful environment shaped by people working hand in hand with nature over thousands of years. Here’s a taste of places to explore on land or by water. And your adventure is closer than you think – turn to page 30 to see how easy it Broads tours... is to get to the Broads. © Crown copyright and database rights 2015. Ordnance Survey Licence number 100021573. A tour on the Bure, Thurne Mill Ant and Thurne Salhouse Broad on the Bure has space to play, adventure park near Horning. a short walk, canoe hire and ferry trips over to To the north, on the Ant, Hoveton Great Broad Nature Trail. If you’re on is Barton Broad, a nature a boat you can moor up at the trail. reserve with a wheelchair- accessible boardwalk out to a viewpoint over the broad. In early summer there are masses of yellow flag irises. The Nancy Oldfield Trust at Neatishead offers boating activities for disabled and socially disadvantaged people. Just downstream from Barton is How Hill, a nature reserve with a walking trail, a At Ranworth take the boardwalk through the thatched cottage museum, drainage mills to nature reserve to the visitor centre or catch see and trips though the marshes on a tiny the ferry from the moorings. There are longer boat called the boat trips too and regular events. The church Electric Eel. It’s is known as the cathedral of the Broads - and one of the best you can even climb places to see the tower.
    [Show full text]