A Geochemical Study of Four Prehistoric Quarries in Oaxaca, Mexico
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
A GEOCHEMICAL STUDY OF FOUR PREHISTORIC QUARRIES IN OAXACA, MEXICO. by MICHELLE L. TROGDON (Under the direction of Ervan Garrison) ABSTRACT Petrographic and geochemical analyses of chert quarries used in antiquity for stone tool production in the Mixteca Alta, Oaxaca, Mexico have shown some promising results. This study combines petrography, electron microprobe analysis, hydrofluoric acid treatment, and isotope analysis to identify differences between four quarries and build a database of characteristics associated with each quarry. Major elements in trace amounts (Al, Ca, Na, Mg, and K) and their distribution, fossils, and δ18O values were unable to distinguish unique characteristics of the four quarries presented. However, these methods did reveal interesting information regarding chert formation in general and specific processes that influenced chert formation in Oaxaca. INDEX WORDS: Archaeological Geology, Oaxaca, Mixteca Alta, Chert, Electron Microprobe Analysis, Stable Isotopes. A GEOCHEMICAL STUDY OF FOUR PREHISTORIC QUARRIES IN OAXACA, MEXICO. by MICHELLE L. TROGDON B.S., Allegheny College, 2004 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF SCIENCE ATHENS, GEORGIA 2007 © 2007 MICHELLE L. TROGDON All Rights Reserved A GEOCHEMICAL STUDY OF FOUR PREHISTORIC QUARRIES IN OAXACA, MEXICO. by MICHELLE L. TROGDON Major Professor: Ervan Garrison Committee: Samuel E. Swanson Stephen A. Kowalewski Electronic Version Approved: Maureen Grasso Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia December 2007 DEDICATION To my mother. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thank you to my wonderful committee at the University of Georgia; UGA, Watts- Wheeler, CLACS, SAAS; special thanks to INAH; Dr. Ronald Spores and Dr. Nelly Robles co- directors of the Pueblo Viejo project; the community of Teposcolula; the ancient Mixtec people; Mis chicas arqueologicas de Pueblo Viejo; mi guia don Benito; Sheldon Skaggs; Chris Fleisher; Julie Cox; Viorel Atudorei; Doug Crowe; Bruce Railsback; Meg Kinsella; my family for never understanding exactly what I do, but always intently listening; my friends and those whom have gone before me for also listening and helping me find motivation; and lastly my dog for never ever eating my thesis (just my students’ homework). v TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.............................................................................................................v LIST OF TABLES....................................................................................................................... viii LIST OF FIGURES ....................................................................................................................... ix CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................1 2 ARCHAEOLOGICAL PROBLEM...............................................................................7 Lithics in Oaxaca.......................................................................................................7 Postclassic Period....................................................................................................12 El Fortin (TE 2) .......................................................................................................13 Tixa Viejo (TE 127) ................................................................................................14 Pueblo Viejo (TE 1) ................................................................................................15 Conclusions .............................................................................................................17 3 GEOLOGICAL SETTING..........................................................................................19 Tectonic Setting.......................................................................................................19 Geology of the study area........................................................................................21 Quarry Stratigraphy.................................................................................................26 4 CLASSIFICATION AND PROPERTIES OF CHERT...............................................32 Formation processes and varieties of chert .............................................................32 Physical properties ..................................................................................................34 Chemical properties.................................................................................................36 5 METHODS ..................................................................................................................38 vi X-Ray Diffraction....................................................................................................38 Petrography .............................................................................................................39 Hydrofluoric Acid Treatment..................................................................................39 Electron Microprobe Analysis.................................................................................39 Stable Isotope ..........................................................................................................40 6 RESULTS ....................................................................................................................43 Physical properties and Petrography .......................................................................43 Hydrofluoric Acid Treatment..................................................................................46 Electron Microprobe Analysis.................................................................................49 Stable Isotope ..........................................................................................................57 7 DISCUSSION & CONCLUSIONS.............................................................................61 Physical properties and Petrography .......................................................................61 Hydrofluoric Acid Treatment..................................................................................63 Electron Microprobe Analysis.................................................................................63 Stable Isotope ..........................................................................................................64 Conclusions .............................................................................................................65 REFERENCES ..............................................................................................................................67 APPENDICES ...............................................................................................................................81 A All chert samples and the various methods used in this study.....................................81 B Peak positions in degrees and d-spacing and relative intensity of XRD samples .......84 C EMP results for all four quarries. Thirty points were measured per sample ...............87 D Stable isotope values of chert and host carbonate rock for all four quarries .............118 vii LIST OF TABLES Page Table 2.1: The phases of the Mixteca Alta through time (modified from Balkansky et al., 2000) .8 Table 2.2: Gray and green obsidian distribution at three sites in the Teposcolula Valley ............14 Table 6.1: Thin section observations from four quarries...............................................................44 Table 6.2: Daily Electron Microprobe Analysis minimum detection limits..................................50 Table 6.3: Daily EMP measurements of a quartz standard............................................................50 Table 6.4: Average of points above EMP minimum detection limits for nine samples from the quarry of Yolomecatl.....................................................................................................51 Table 6.5: Average of points above EMPA minimum detection limits for nine samples from the quarry of Chilapa...........................................................................................................53 Table 6.6: Average of points above EMPA minimum detection limits for nine samples from the quarry of San Felipe Ixtapa ...........................................................................................55 Table 6.7: Average of points above EMPA minimum detection limits for nine samples from the quarry of Prieto..............................................................................................................56 Table 6.8: Isotopic composition (‰) of chert samples from all quarries ......................................58 viii LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure 1.1 Geologic map of the study area in Oaxaca, Mexico. The green unit represents the Cretaceous deposits including eight formations. Pueblo Viejo is the archaeological site of interest and Yolomecatl, Chilapa, San Felipe Ixtapa, and Prieto are the proposed quarries ............................................................................................................................4 Figure 2.1 The Mixteca Alta is located in the west-central portion of the state of Oaxaca.............8 Figure 2.2 The quarry of Prieto shown here appears to be a large pile of debris in fact was a site for initial core testing (1m scale).....................................................................................9