DOCSLIB.ORG

U.S. Geological Survey Karst Interest Group Proceedings, San Antonio, Texas, May 16–18, 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
U.S. Geological Survey Karst Interest Group Proceedings, San Antonio, Texas, May 16–18, 2017 A Product of the Water Availability and Use Science Program Prepared in cooperation with the Department of Geological Sciences at the University of Texas at San Antonio and hosted by the Student Geological Society and student chapters of the Association of Petroleum Geologists and the Association of Engineering Geologists U.S. Geological Survey Karst Interest Group Proceedings, San Antonio, Texas, May 16–18, 2017 Edited By Eve L. Kuniansky and Lawrence E. Spangler Scientific Investigations Report 2017–5023 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior RYAN ZINKE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey William Werkheiser, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2017 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit https://www.usgs.gov/ or call 1–888–ASK–USGS (1–888–275–8747). For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit https://store.usgs.gov. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner. Suggested citation: Kuniansky, E.L., and Spangler, L.E., eds., 2017, U.S. Geological Survey Karst Interest Group Proceedings, San Antonio, Texas, May 16–18, 2017: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2017–5023, 245 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20175023. ISSN 2328-0328 (online) ii Contents Introduction and Acknowledgments .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Agenda U.S. Geological Survey Karst Interest Group Workshop ..................................................................................................... 4 Karst Science: A National and International Review and Status Report ........................................................................................... 8 A Multi-Disciplined Approach to Understanding and Managing Shared Karst Landscapes ............................................................ 11 Methodology for Calculating Probability, Protection, and Precipitation Factors of the P3 Method for Karst Aquifer Vulnerability ................................................................................................................................................................ 14 Methodology for Calculating Karst Watershed Nitrogen Inputs and Developing a SWAT Model ................................................... 24 Attenuation of Acid Rock Drainage with a Sequential Injection of Compounds to Reverse Biologically Mediated Pyrite Oxidation in the Chattanooga Shale in Tennessee ................................................................................................................. 37 A GIS-Based Compilation of Spring Locations and Geochemical Parameters in the Appalachian Landscape Conservation Cooperative (LCC) Region ................................................................................................................................ 38 Hydrogeophysical Investigations in the Upper Arbuckle Group on the Tishomingo Anticline in the Central Arbuckle Mountains of Southern Oklahoma ........................................................................................................................................... 49 Karst Aquifer Characteristics in a Public-Supply Well Field Near Elizabethtown, Kentucky ........................................................... 58 A Review of Recent Karst Research in the China Geological Survey............................................................................................. 59 Intra-Annual Variations of Soil CO2 and Drip-Water Chemistry in Shihua Cave, Beijing, China and Their Implications for the Formation of Annual Laminae in Stalagmites .............................................................................................................. 74 The Chemical and Stable Isotopic Characteristics of Heilongtan Springs, Kunming, China ........................................................... 76 Formation Mechanisms of Extremely Large Sinkhole Collapses in Laibin, Guangxi, China ........................................................... 79 Timescales of Groundwater Quality Change in Karst Groundwater: Edwards Aquifer, South-Central Texas ................................ 80 Estimating Recharge to the Edwards Aquifer, South-Central, Texas—Current (2017) Methods and Introduction of an Automated Method Using the Python Scripting Language ...................................................................................................... 81 Geologic Framework and Hydrostratigraphy of the Edwards and Trinity Aquifers Within Northern Bexar and Comal Counties, Texas ........................................................................................................................................................... 85 Aromatic-Ring Biodegradation in Soils From a Crude Oil Spill on Clear Creek, Obed Wild and Scenic River National Park, Tennessee ....................................................................................................................................................... 88 Investigating Microbial Response to Fertilizer Application From Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations Located on Karst Aquifers in Northern Arkansas .................................................................................................................................. 89 Evidence for Karst-Influenced Cross-Formational Fluid Bypass of a Dolomite Unit at the Top of the Oldsmar Formation in the Lower Floridan Aquifer, Southeast Florida ................................................................................................... 90 Collapse of the Devonian Prairie Evaporite Karst in the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin: Structuration of the Overlying Cretaceous Athabasca Oil Sands and Regional Flow System Reversal by Subglacial Meltwater ......................... 92 Tufa and Water Radiogenic Geochemistry and Tufa Ages for Two Karst Aquifers in the Buffalo National River Region, Northern Arkansas ................................................................................................................................................................ 107 Isotopic Constraints on Middle Pleistocene Cave Evolution, Paleohydrologic Flow, and Environmental Conditions From Fitton Cave Speleothems, Buffalo National River, Arkansas ....................................................................................... 119 Speleogenetic, Tectonic, and Sedimentologic Controls on Regional Karst Aquifers in the Southern Ozarks of the Midcontinent U.S., and Potential Problems at Site-Specific Scales From Aquifer Lumping ................................................. 133 Geologic Context of Large Karst Springs and Caves in the Ozark National Scenic Riverways, Missouri .................................... 135 Utilizing Fluorescent Dyes to Identify Meaningful Water-Quality Sampling Locations and Enhance Understanding of Groundwater Flow Near a Hog CAFO on Mantled Karst, Buffalo National River, Southern Ozarks ................................. 147 iii Using Quantitative Tracer Studies to Evaluate the Connection Between the Surface and Subsurface at Mammoth Cave National Park, Kentucky ............................................................................................................................................... 161 Stalagmite δ13C and δ18O Records for the Past 130,000 Years From the Eastern Edge of the Chinese Loess Plateau (CLP): Responses of the CLP as a Carbon Sink to Climate Change ...................................................................... 163 Hydrogeochemical Characteristics of Precipitation and Cave Drip Water in Zhenzhu Cave, North China ................................... 164 High-Resolution Summer Monsoon Intensity Variations in Central China From 26,000 to 11,000 Years Before Present as Revealed by Stalagmite Oxygen Isotope Ratios .............................................................................................................. 165 Controls on the Oxygen Isotopic Variability of Meteoric Precipitation, Drip Water, and Calcite Deposition at Baojinggong Cave and Shihua Cave, China ......................................................................................................................... 166 Use of Seismic-Reflection and Multibeam-Bathymetry Data to Investigate the Origin of Seafloor Depressions on the Southeastern Florida Platform ............................................................................................................................................... 167 Characterization of Microkarst Capping Lower Eocene High-Frequency Carbonate Cycles, Southeast Florida .......................... 168 Overview of the Revised Hydrogeologic Framework of the Floridan Aquifer System, Florida and Parts of Alabama, Georgia, and South Carolina ................................................................................................................................................. 170 Numerical Simulation of Karst Groundwater Flow at the Laboratory Scale .................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Geohog Times Newsletter of the Department of Geosciences Summer 2019
    GeoHog Times Newsletter of the Department of Geosciences Summer 2019 Rebecca Hunt-Foster Dinosaur National Monument Paleontologist and Museum Director BS Earth Science 2003 Software Donations UA Geosciences Projects UA Geosciences Research Grants FY19 Q1-Q3 Grants Awarded Principal Investigators 7 6 Total Awarded Dept Rank in College Data Donations $1.03M 5/19 UA Geosciences Publications Jun 2018 - Jul 2019 Peer Review Papers Non-Peer �eview Papers 67 18 Books Conference Abstracts 3 80 2 Geosciences Department Overview Christopher Liner, Chair in Slovenia. Two of our faculty re- The department received a major ceived competitive Cambridge Faculty software donation from Ikon Sciences This has been a year of changes. In Fellowships to spend time in England. (market value $2.4M). RocDoc is used spring Ralph Davis announced his re- Ted Holland was awarded a full year to analyze well and seismic data, de- tirement from UA and his moving on fellowship at Wolfson College and Ce- termine value and apply quantitative to be VP of Research at the South Da- lina Suarez will spend the spring se- methods to predict rock, fluid and kota School of Mines. Davis was on the mester at Lucy Cavendish College. In pressure properties. Thank you ikon faculty from 1994-2019, and served as all off campus duty assignments, the for supporting our students. Geosciences Department Chair 2008- faculty submits a teaching and ad- As always, the faculty and stu- 2016, a period during which the PhD vising plan explaining how their nor- dents of our department are very program began and the Maurice F.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography-Of-Texas-Speleology
    1. Anonymous. n.d. University of Texas Bulletin No. 4631, pp. 51. 2. Anonymous. 1992. Article on Pendejo Cave. Washington Post, 10 February 1992. 3. Anonymous. 1992. Article on bats. Science News, 8 February 1992. 4. Anonymous. 2000. National Geographic, 2000 (December). 5. Anonymous. n.d. Believe odd Texas caves is Confederate mine; big rock door may be clue to mystery. 6. Anonymous. n.d. The big dig. Fault Zone, 4:8. 7. Anonymous. n.d. Cannibals roam Texas cave. Georgetown (?). 8. Anonymous. n.d. Cavern under highway is plugged by road crew. Source unknown. 9. Anonymous. n.d. Caverns of Sonora: Better Interiors. Olde Mill Publ. Co., West Texas Educators Credit Union. 10. Anonymous. n.d. Crawling, swimming spelunkers discover new rooms of cave. Austin(?). Source unknown. 11. Anonymous. n.d. Discovery (of a sort) in Airmen's Cave. Fault Zone, 5:16. 12. Anonymous. n.d. Footnotes. Fault Zone, 5:13. 13. Anonymous. n.d. Help the blind... that is, the Texas blind salamander [Brochure]: Texas Nature Conservancy. 2 pp. 14. Anonymous. n.d. Honey Creek map. Fault Zone, 4:2. 15. Anonymous. n.d. The Langtry mini-project. Fault Zone, 5:3-5. 16. Anonymous. n.d. Neuville or Gunnels Cave. http:// www.shelbycountytexashistory.org/neuvillecave.htm [accessed 9 May 2008]. 17. Anonymous. n.d. Palo Duro Canyon State Scenic Park. Austin: Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. 2 pp. 18. Anonymous. n.d. Texas blind salamander (Typhlomolge rathbuni). Mississippi Underground Dispatch, 3(9):8. 19. Anonymous. n.d. The TSA at Cascade Caverns. Fault Zone, 4:1-3, 7-8.
    [Show full text]
  • GSA Poster 2013 Long
    Hydrological and Geochemical Characteristics in the Edwards and Trinity Hydrostratigraphic Units Using Multiport Monitor Wells in the Balcones Fault Zone, Hays County, Central Texas Alan Andrews, Brian Hunt, Brian Smith Purpose Rising-falling K Slug-in K Slug-out K Zone Zone (ft/day) (ft/day) (ft/day) Thickness (ft) Trans ft2/day Stratigraphy 21 0.3 -- -- 35 10 Stratigraphy General Hydrologic ID To better understand the hydrogeological properties of and 20 53 -- -- 70 3700 Eagle Ford/ Hydrostratigraphy Function thickness in feet Lithology Porosity/Permeability Sources Rising-falling K Slug K Zone Transmissivity Qal? confining Zone (ft/day) (ft/day) Thickness (ft) (ft2/day) 19 5 8 6 30 140 40-50 Dense limestone Buda unit (CU) Low 18 3 3 -- 25 84 relationships between the geologic units that make up the Confining Units 14 -- -- 136 -- CU Blue-green to 17 38 -- 44 105 4000 Upper Del Rio 50-60 Upper Confining Unit 13 65 -- 72 13000 137.9’ Fract oyster wakestone yellow-brown clay 16 29 80 19 70 2000 12 2 -- 34 460 145.7’ stylolites and fract I Edwards, Upper and Middle Trinity Aquifers and to compare Georgetown Fm. CU Marly limestone; grnst Low 15 29 105 161 75 2100 40-60 11 4 -- 159 8300 Crystalline limestone; mdst to wkst 14 8 10 3 45 370 Leached and 199.6’ fossil (toucasid) vug Aquifer (AQ) III to milliolid grnst; chert; collapse High 10 0.09 -- 197 50 13 4 2 6 40 160 observed hydrologic properties of formations to generally accept- Collapsed mbrs 230’ solutioned bedding plane 30-80 breccia 9 0.005 -- 97 4 12 0.2 -- -- 85 -- 200 feet Reg.
    [Show full text]
  • Speleogenesis in Comal County, Texas
    RICE UNIVERSITY SPELEOGENES IS IN COMAL COUNTY, TEXAS by Barry F. Beck A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN GEOLOGY Thesis Director's signature: Houston, Texas May, 1968 ABSTRACT 0AR Hi F> BBct( Caves in Comal County, Texas, were examined with regard to their lithologic and geomorphic setting, paying particular attention to con¬ trols such as stratigraphic variation, topography, jointing, and ground-water flow. In the light of these data, a new classification of caves is pro¬ posed "based upon the mode of water flow involved in their formation. Influent caves are formed by water flowing from the surface to the ground-water table. Effluent caves are formed by water flowing from the ground-water reservoir to the surface. Conduit caves are formed principally by- phreatic flow with little, or no, surface relationship. This classification is extremely useful in identifying the factors involved in speleogenesis when used in conjunction with areal maps of the aforementioned controls. Effluent caves in the lower Glen Rose Formation are localized within a massive, fossiliferous aquifer and oriented generally down-dip, thus substantiating Gardner’s (1935) theory of speleogenesis. Influent caves in both the upper and lower Glen Rose Formation are developed in areas with low surface gradient and consequently high infiltration. They develop vertically until the water reaches a suitable calcareous stratum which conducts it away laterally. A later change of conditions may cause further deepening and a series of pits and passages may develop. Conduit caves in the upper Glen Rose Formation appear to be localized within the more calcareous strata because of the high solubility of these layers in contrast to the shales, marls, and dolomites composing the major part of the section.
    [Show full text]
  • Reptile Family Tree
    Reptile Family Tree - Peters 2015 Distribution of Scales, Scutes, Hair and Feathers Fish scales 100 Ichthyostega Eldeceeon 1990.7.1 Pederpes 91 Eldeceeon holotype Gephyrostegus watsoni Eryops 67 Solenodonsaurus 87 Proterogyrinus 85 100 Chroniosaurus Eoherpeton 94 72 Chroniosaurus PIN3585/124 98 Seymouria Chroniosuchus Kotlassia 58 94 Westlothiana Casineria Utegenia 84 Brouffia 95 78 Amphibamus 71 93 77 Coelostegus Cacops Paleothyris Adelospondylus 91 78 82 99 Hylonomus 100 Brachydectes Protorothyris MCZ1532 Eocaecilia 95 91 Protorothyris CM 8617 77 95 Doleserpeton 98 Gerobatrachus Protorothyris MCZ 2149 Rana 86 52 Microbrachis 92 Elliotsmithia Pantylus 93 Apsisaurus 83 92 Anthracodromeus 84 85 Aerosaurus 95 85 Utaherpeton 82 Varanodon 95 Tuditanus 91 98 61 90 Eoserpeton Varanops Diplocaulus Varanosaurus FMNH PR 1760 88 100 Sauropleura Varanosaurus BSPHM 1901 XV20 78 Ptyonius 98 89 Archaeothyris Scincosaurus 77 84 Ophiacodon 95 Micraroter 79 98 Batropetes Rhynchonkos Cutleria 59 Nikkasaurus 95 54 Biarmosuchus Silvanerpeton 72 Titanophoneus Gephyrostegeus bohemicus 96 Procynosuchus 68 100 Megazostrodon Mammal 88 Homo sapiens 100 66 Stenocybus hair 91 94 IVPP V18117 69 Galechirus 69 97 62 Suminia Niaftasuchus 65 Microurania 98 Urumqia 91 Bruktererpeton 65 IVPP V 18120 85 Venjukovia 98 100 Thuringothyris MNG 7729 Thuringothyris MNG 10183 100 Eodicynodon Dicynodon 91 Cephalerpeton 54 Reiszorhinus Haptodus 62 Concordia KUVP 8702a 95 59 Ianthasaurus 87 87 Concordia KUVP 96/95 85 Edaphosaurus Romeria primus 87 Glaucosaurus Romeria texana Secodontosaurus
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing on the Eleven Point River
    FISHING ON THE ELEVEN POINT RIVER Fishing the Eleven Point National Scenic River is a very popular recreation activity on the Mark Twain National Forest. The river sees a variety of users and is shared by canoes and boats, swimmers, trappers, and anglers. Please use caution and courtesy when encountering another user. Be aware that 25 horsepower is the maximum boat motor size allowed on the Eleven Point River from Thomasville to "the Narrows" at Missouri State Highway 142. Several sections of the river are surrounded by private land. Before walking on the bank, ask the landowners for permission. Many anglers today enjoy the sport of the catch and fight, but release the fish un-harmed. Others enjoy the taste of freshly caught fish. Whatever your age, skill level or desire, you should be aware of fishing rules and regulations, and a little natural history of your game. The Varied Waters The Eleven Point River, because of its variety of water sources, offers fishing for both cold and warm-water fish. Those fishing the waters of the Eleven Point tend to divide the river into three distinctive areas. Different fish live in different parts of the river depending upon the water temperature and available habitat. The upper river, from Thomasville to the Greer Spring Branch, is good for smallmouth bass, longear sunfish, bluegill, goggle-eye (rock bass), suckers, and a few largemouth bass. This area of the river is warmer and its flow decreases during the summer. The river and fish communities change where Greer Spring Branch enters the river.
    [Show full text]
  • For Creative Minds
    For Creative Minds The For Creative Minds educational section may be photocopied or printed from our website by the owner of this book for educational, non-commercial uses. Cross-curricular teaching activities, interactive quizzes, and more are available online. Go to www.ArbordalePublishing.com and click on the book’s cover to explore all the links. Animal Homes Animals use homes to sleep, to hide from predators, to raise their young, to store food, and even to hide from weather (heat, cold, rain, or snow). All animals find shelter in or around things that are found in the habitat where they live— living (plants or even other animals) or non-living (water, rocks, or soil). Some animals stay in one location for long periods of time while other animals might make a home for short periods of time—as long as it takes to raise young or when travelling. Animals use dens as nurseries to raise their young. Dens can be burrows, caves, holes, or even small areas under bushes and trees. Caves protect animals from the hot sun during the day. They also provide shelter from wind and cold weather. Some caves are so deep underground that there is no sunlight at the bottom! Narrow cracks in rocks (crevices) and tree holes protect animals from larger predators. Most animals can’t make crevices bigger but many animals make holes bigger. Once they have a hole big enough, they move in. A burrow is an underground hole or tunnel. Some burrows have one entrance but other burrows may have many “rooms” and several ways in and out.
    [Show full text]
  • In the United States District Court for the District Of
    4:02-cv-03093-LES-DLP Doc # 109 Filed: 06/01/06 Page 1 of 20 - Page ID # 1322 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA INSURANCE AGENCY OF BEAVER ) CROSSING, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) 4:02CV3093 ) v. ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ) MEMORANDUM OPINION COMMODITY CREDIT CORPORATION, ) an agency of the United States ) of America within the Department ) of Agriculture. ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________) The plaintiff, Insurance Agency of Beaver Crossing, Inc. (“Beaver Crossing”), commenced this action against the United States of America and the Commodity Credit Corporation (“the CCC”), an agency within the United States Department of Agriculture (“the USDA”), under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671 et seq., seeking damages for negligence and private nuisance.1 Beaver Crossing alleges that the CCC, which operated a grain storage facility across from Beaver Crossing’s farmland (“the Property”) from approximately 1950-1974, negligently handled grain fumigants containing carbon tetrachloride (“CT”) so as to allow the CT to migrate through the 1 Beaver Crossing’s amended complaint also asserted claims against the government for inverse condemnation and trespass. Both of these claims have since been dismissed (See Filing Nos. 23 & 85). 4:02-cv-03093-LES-DLP Doc # 109 Filed: 06/01/06 Page 2 of 20 - Page ID # 1323 soil and contaminate the shallow aquifer below Beaver Crossing’s farmland. A trial to the Court, sitting without a jury, was held on May 15-18, 2006. The Court, having considered the evidence, the briefs and arguments of counsel, and the applicable law, hereby enters the following findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Fed.
    [Show full text]
  • US Geological Survey Karst Interest Group Proceedings, Fayetteville
    Prepared In Cooperation with the Department of Geosciences at the University of Arkansas U.S. Geological Survey Karst Interest Group Proceedings, Fayetteville, Arkansas, April 26-29, 2011 Scientific Investigations Report 2011-5031 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Prepared in Cooperation with the Department of Geosciences at the University of Arkansas U.S. Geological Survey Karst Interest Group Proceedings, Fayetteville, Arkansas, April 26–29, 2011 Edited By Eve L. Kuniansky Scientific Investigations Report 2011–5031 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey i U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia 2011 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Suggested citation: Kuniansky,E.L., 2011, U.S. Geological Survey Karst Interest Group Proceedings, Fayetteville, Arkansas, April 26-29, 2011, U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2011-5031, 212p. Online copies of the proceedings area available at: http://water.usgs.gov/ogw/karst/ Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Confraternity Thn Lng Folk 2Go
    Edinburgh Research Explorer thN Lng folk 2go Citation for published version: Mulholland, N & Hogg, N 2013, thN Lng folk 2go: Investigating Future Premoderns (TM). Punctum , New York. <http://punctumbooks.com> Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 09. Oct. 2021 thN Lng folk 2go thN Lng folk 2go Investigating Future Premoderns™ The Confraternity of Neoflagellants punctum books ! brooklyn, ny thN Lng folk 2go: Investigating Future Premoderns™ © The Confraternity of Neoflagellants [Norman Hogg and Neil Mulholland], 2013. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This work is Open Access, which means that you are free to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work as long as you clearly attribute the work to the authors, that you do not use this work for commercial gain in any form whatsoever, and that you in no way alter, transform, or build upon the work outside of its normal use in academic scholarship without express permission of the author and the publisher of this volume.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021–2022 University of New Orleans New Student and Family Guide
    2021–2022 Parent & Family GUIDE About This Guide CollegiateParent has published this guide in partnership with the University of Arkansas. Our goal is to share helpful, timely information about your student’s college experience and to connect you to relevant campus and community resources. Please refer to the school’s website and contact information below for updates to information in the guide or with questions about its contents. CollegiateParent is not responsible for omissions or errors. This publication was made possible by the businesses and professionals contained within it. The presence of university/ college logos and marks in the guide does not mean that the publisher or school endorses the products or services offered by the advertisers. CollegiateParent is committed to improving the accessibility of our content. When possible, digital guides are designed to meet the PDF/UA standard and Level AA conformance to WCAG 2.1. CollegiateParent Unfortunately, advertisements, campus- 3180 Sterling Circle, Suite 200 provided maps, and other third-party Boulder, CO 80301 content may not always be entirely Advertising Inquiries accessible. If you experience issues with Л (866) 721-1357 the accessibility of this guide, please reach î CollegiateParent.com/advertisers out to [email protected]. ©2021 CollegiateParent. All rights reserved. Design by Kade O’Connor Л (479) 575-5002 Л (855) 264-0001 (Toll Free) ƍ [email protected] For more information, please contact: î family.uark.edu University of Arkansas î uark.campusesp.com New Student & Family Programs – Razorback Family Portal ARKU A688 \ facebook.com/RazorbackParent 1 University of Arkansas H instagram.com/RazorbackParent CONTENTS Welcome to the Razorback Family! ...............................
    [Show full text]
  • University of Arkansas Parking Rules
    1 2 3 4 5 6 University of Arkansas Transit and Parking web site: Parking Map http://parking.uark.edu Map is not drawn to scale. Map last updated July 26, 2017. Subject to change at any time. To Agricultural Research Lot sign designation takes precedence over map designation. Extension Center Changes may have occurred since the last update. For parking information regarding athletic or special events, Legend please visit the Transit and Parking website or call 40A (479) 575-7275 (PARK). Reserved Hall Ave. Faculty/Staff Cleveland St. Resident Reserved (9 months) 41 UUFF Student 40 MHWR MHER ve. A ve. Remote UAPD ve. 37 A Sub A REID Station Parking Meters GAPG Garland GACS A HOTZ Leverett Ave. Lindell Short-term Meters 42 Oakland MHSR 36B A Patient 75 Parking Parking Garage (Metered Parking Available) GACR NWQC 36 Storer Ave. RFCS Taylor St. Under Construction STAQ NWQB JTCD 42 BKST HOUS CAAC 35N 31N ADA Parking Cardwell Ln. ECHP NWQD Loading Zones NWQA Douglas St. Douglas St. 28 FUTR 36A 30 39 35 78 78A Motorcycle Parking Razorback Rd. 31 ve. ADPS A ve. POSC STAB A ZTAS Scooter Parking FWLR 43 38 66 Ave. Gregg HOLC CIOS Research Oliver Lab Parking 27 AFLS Whitham 29 HLTH MART 34 Reserved Scooter Parking ABCM PDCM 10 VS UNHS DDDS KKGS A FWCS D AOPS B 1 68 PBPS Maple St. Maple St. SCHF KDLS Night Reserved Maple St. B WATR ROSE PTSC ARMY Inn at Carnall Hall 14 ALUM ADMN & Ellas Restaurant Parking Parking Admin. 14D HUNT 9 MEMH No Overnight (See list below) 44 26 ARKA 7 CARN Parking Registrar AGRX 14A 1 PEAH ’ 31N 8 SCSW GRAD FIOR 14C FPAC HOEC AGRI 2 47N 76 14B Reagan St.
    [Show full text]