DOCSLIB.ORG

Jane Finch Mission Centre

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jane Finch Mission Centre JANE FINCH MISSION CENTRE Feasibility Study & Business Case Report For the University Presbyterian Church unit a architecture inc. / February 05, 2014 PG TABLE OF CONTENTS 4 Tables & Figures 6 0.0 Introduction 0.1 The Need for a Feasibility Study and Business Case 0.2 Objectives 0.3 Vision 10 1.0 Site Description 1.1 Development Characteristics 1.2 Environmental Analysis 1.3 Traffic Analysis 1.4 Regulations and Environmental Issues 1.5 Site Analysis 1.6 Zoning Code Analysis 1.7 Building Code Analysis 20 2.0 Case Studies 2.1 Urban Arts 2.2 Evangel Hall Mission 2.3 Pathways to Education 2.4 Regent Park School of Music 28 3.0 Environment 3.1 Priority Investment Neighbourhood 3.2 Housing 3.3 Conflict 36 4.0 Service Infrastructure 4.1 Access to Service Providers 4.2 Music Services 42 5.0 Investment Options 5.1 Introduction 5.2 Existing Facilities Review 5.3 Existing Church Building Use 5.4 New Investment 5.5 Schematic Design 60 6.0 Business Models 6.1 UPC Designs-Finances-Builds-Operates Facility 6.2 UPC Designs-Finances-Builds New Facility and Operates Church, Third Party Operates Nutritional, Homework and Music Services 6.3 New Jane Finch Mission Board Designs-Finances-Builds and Operates Facility 6.4 Sponsorships 6.5 Conclusion 2 66 7.0 Financial Projections 7.1 LEED Cost-Benefit Analysis 7.2 Capital Costs 7.3 Revenue Centres 7.4 Operating Expenses 7.5 Five-Year Pro-forma Projections 7.6 Project Costs Breakdown 78 8.0 Implementation 8.1 Implementation of the Project 82 9.0 Recommendations 9.1 Alternative 1: Do not proceed with construction of the Jane Finch Mission Centre. 9.2 Alternative 2: Proceed with construction of the Jane Finch Mission Centre using the Preferred Redevelopment Option. A86 Appx. A Zoning & Code A.1 Zoning chart A.2 Building code chart B90 Appx. B Concept Studies B.1 Concept B.2 Concept B.3 Concept B.4 Concept B.5 Concept C96 Appx. C Other Studies C.1 Statistics FIGURE 0-0. UNIVERSITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH SIGN 3 Tables & Figures FIGURE 0-0. university presbyterian church sign 3 FIGURE 0-1. sunday worship service at university presbyterian church 7 FIGURE 1-1. bird’s-eye view of site (finch ave. west & driftwood ave.) 11 FIGURE 1-2. bus stop & vegetation at southwest corner of site 13 FIGURE 1-3. existing driveway located north of church 14 FIGURE 1-4. diagram showing usage and development potential 17 FIGURE 1-5. 944 sq m max lot coverage without a minor variance 18 FIGURE 1-6. 757 sq m max building area permitted without sprinklers 19 TABLE 3-1.site boundaries 29 FIGURE 3-2. Priority neighbourhood: jane-finch area 30 FIGURE 3-3. catchment area 31 FIGURE 3-4. housing services: jane-finch area 32 FIGURE 3-5. community housing in toronto 33 FIGURE 3-6. newspaper article on violence in toronto 34 FIGURE 4-1. access to service infrastructure within jane-finch area 39 FIGURE 4-2. service infrastructure grouped by age targets 40 FIGURE 4-3. access to private music education within jane-finch area 41 FIGURE 5-1. east elevation of university Presbyterian church 43 TABLE 5-2. building audit chart 44 FIGURE 5-3. 1 of 4 community rooms in the basement 45 FIGURE 5-4. minister`s office 45 TABLE 5-5. building usage chart 47 4 FIGURE 5-6. bird’s-eye view of site (finch ave w & driftwood ave) 50 FIGURE 5-7. proposed program areas 51 FIGURE 5-8. site plan 53 FIGURE 5-9. massing concept 1 54 FIGURE 5-10. massing concept 2 54 FIGURE 5-11. upper floor plan 55 FIGURE 5-12. lower floor plan 55 FIGURE 5-13. diagrams multifunctional main hall 56-7 FIGURE 5-14. vignette from southwest corner 58 FIGURE 5-15. birds-eye view from southeast corner 58-9 FIGURE 7-1. LEED certification levels 67 FIGURE 7-2. LEED cost benefit 68 FIGURE 7-4. five-year pro-forma projection 74 FIGURE 8-1. reference timeline from municipal approvals to construction 81 FIGURE A-1. 944 sq m max lot coverage without a minor variance A87 FIGURE A-2. 757 sq m max building area permitted without sprinklers A89 5 0.0 INTRODUCTION 6 1276 JFMC Feasibility Report 0.0 Introduction FIGURE 0-1. SUNDAY WORSHIP SERVICE AT UNIVERSITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH Source: www.universitychurch.ca University Presbyterian Church retained unit a architecture inc. to conduct a feasibility study and prepare a preliminary business case, which the Church requires for the development of a Jane Finch Mission Centre. Project Management for the Church was undertaken by a Steering Committee. The site, located on the north east corner of Driftwood Ave. and Finch Ave. West was pre-selected for development as it is the location of the current University Presbyterian Church. 0.1 The Need for a Feasibility Study and Business Case University Presbyterian Church is a small church built in 1964 simultaneously with the new Jane Finch community, a mix of individual family houses and high quality apartment towers. In the intervening fifty years much has changed. The church building has reached the end of its lifespan; it is operationally dysfunctional and grossly undersized for its current congregation. As well, the neighbourhood is no longer predominately middle class. Therefore this study is important to determine; • The full costs to construct and operate a new facility; • To identify the range of uses within the facility; • Site constraints; 7 1276 JFMC Feasibility Report 0.0 Introduction • Other potential partners; • The overall value of such a facility to University Presbyterian Church (UPC). 0.2 Objectives The following are key objectives and deliverables for the feasibility study and business case as follows: • Delivery of an Appropriate Consultant Program including at least one Public Presentation to determine Congregational comments on the Preferred Redevelopment Concept; • Analyze current market trends and best practices in order to drive design and use of the proposed Mission Centre; • Review and make recommendations on the appropriate uses within the facility (including size and layout) for the congregation and Mission along with other service commercial, retail and public uses, including other possible partners; • Review the general costs and benefits of different concepts (different size buildings, different amounts of commercial activities etc.) as a business plan considering five-year projections of operating expenses and revenue projections with recommendations on the most economically feasible option including construction budgets and operating budgets for the scenarios; • Operating Model and Investment Review to determine partnerships and investment opportunities including options on how to operate the Mission Centre; • Rendering and plans of the Preferred Redevelopment Concept; • Review of feasibility (cost and potential usage review) of public uses within the Mission (worship, community meeting space, homework club, music school. nutrition program, gallery space etc.); and • Site constraint analysis including traffic impact assessment and engineering service review to reinforce the appropriateness of the site for a Mission Centre. 8 1276 JFMC Feasibility Report 0.0 Introduction 0.3 Vision University Presbyterian Church (UPC) has been serving the Jane-Finch community since 1964. UPC developed its community programs in response to a 2007 Community Assessment Report by Toronto City Mission. The study identified the feelings of fear or bondage held by members within the community. 82% parents stated that their greatest fear was that they were exposing their children to negative influences because they lived within the Jane-Finch neighbourhood. The after-school program was started in 2008 to help children with their homework and ensure that they would do well in school and not drop out. In 2009 this was followed by a music program, which gave the children an opportunity to discover their musical talents and learn to play an instrument of their choice. Today the Jane-Finch Reaching UP ministry has been well established in the community. UPC’s “Vision 2015” is to expand its community programs and build a Christian Mission Centre. The goal is to provide out-reach programs to share the love of God in Jesus Christ and be a light in the face of the brokenness in the community. The five-year plan, initiated in 2010, began with building discipleship in the UPC congregation. Together, members and friends of UPC worked on defining the vision for UPC to be a place where people in the community can participate in various programs seven days a week. It is UPC’s vision to be more than a Sunday worship service, but to be a place where the Jane-Finch community’s daily bread can be met. On January 14, 2013, Rev Thomas Kim presented Vision 2015 to the committee of Vision and Growth of the Presbytery of West Toronto. The Vision and Growth committee recommended that a feasibility study needed to be done for a concrete proposal. As a response to the committee’s suggestion, the Jane-Finch Mission Centre feasibility study has been commissioned since March 2013. The goal of the study was to understand the existing facilities and property to determine the nature of alterations, expansions or construction of new facilities that may be required to meet the programming and broader vision of the Jane-Finch Mission Centre. 9 1.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 10 1276 JFMC Feasibility Report 1.0 Site Description FIGURE 1-1. BIRD’S-EYE VIEW OF SITE (FINCH AVE. WEST & DRIFTWOOD AVE.) The University Presbyterian Church site (figure 1-1) is located on a prominent corner lot on a rise of land looking south over Finch Ave. West at Driftwood Ave.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Renaming of Belshaw Street
    STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Renaming of "Belshaw Street " to "Regent Park Boulevard" Date: December 14, 2012 To: Toronto East York Community Council From: City Surveyor Wards: Ward 28 Reference P:\2013\Cluster B\TEC\TE13009 Number: SUMMARY On May 15, 2012, Toronto and East York Community Council adopted Item TE16.62 directing the Executive Director, Technical Services to report back on naming the new street running south from Dundas Street East between Sackville Street and Sumach Street as "Regent Park Boulevard". Six months prior to the TEYCC Motion, on November 14, 2011, Registered Plan 66M- 2491 formally named this street "Belshaw Street". Therefore, any consideration of "Regent Park Boulevard" would be a renaming under the City of Toronto Honourific and Street Naming Policy. The proposed name "Regent Park Boulevard" does not comply with the City of Toronto Honourific and Street Naming Policy and is objectionable to Police Services, Fire Services, and Emergency Medical Services. This report recommends that the proposed name "Regent Park Boulevard" not be approved for the renaming of "Belshaw Street". RECOMMENDATIONS Technical Services recommends that Toronto East York Community Council: (1) not approve the name, "Regent Park Boulevard" for the renaming of the street previously named "Belshaw Street". Financial Impact There are no financial implications resulting from the adoption of this report. ISSUE BACKGROUND Proposal to Rename Belshaw St 1 At the meeting of May 15, 2012, Toronto and East York Community Council adopted Item TE16.62 which contained the following recommendation: 1. Directed the City Surveyor to report back to the Toronto and East York Community Council on naming the new City of Toronto street running south from Dundas Street East between Sackville Street and Sumach Street as "Regent Park Boulevard".
    [Show full text]
  • Neighbourhood Equity Scores for Toronto Neighbourhoods and Recommended Neighbourhood Improvement Areas
    Appendix B Neighbourhood Equity Scores for Toronto Neighbourhoods and Recommended Neighbourhood Improvement Areas All Scores are out of a maximum 100 points: the lower the Score, the higher the level of total overall inequities faced by the neighbourhood. Neighbourhoods with Scores lower than the Neighbourhood Equity Benchmark of 42.89 face serious inequities that require immediate action. Neighbourhoods marked with "*" in the Rank column were designated by Council as Priority Neighbourhood Areas for Investment (PNIs) under the 2005 Strategy. For neighbourhoods marked with a "+" in the Rank column, a smaller portion of the neighbourhood was included in a larger Priority Neighbourhood Areas for Investment designated by Council under the 2005 Strategy. Neighbourhood Recommended Rank Neighbourhood Number and Name Equity Score as NIA 1* 24 Black Creek 21.38 Y 2* 25 Glenfield-Jane Heights 24.39 Y 3* 115 Mount Dennis 26.39 Y 4 112 Beechborough-Greenbrook 26.54 Y 5 121 Oakridge 28.57 Y 6* 2 Mount Olive-Silverstone-Jamestown 29.29 Y 7 5 Elms-Old Rexdale 29.54 Y 8 72 Regent Park 29.81 Y 9 55 Thorncliffe Park 33.09 Y 10 85 South Parkdale 33.10 Y 11* 61 Crescent Town 33.21 Y 12 111 Rockcliffe-Smythe 33.86 Y 13* 139 Scarborough Village 33.94 Y 14* 21 Humber Summit 34.30 Y 15 28 Rustic 35.40 Y 16 125 Ionview 35.73 Y 17* 44 Flemingdon Park 35.81 Y 18* 113 Weston 35.99 Y 19* 22 Humbermede 36.09 Y 20* 138 Eglinton East 36.28 Y 21 135 Morningside 36.89 Y Staff report for action on the Toronto Strong Neighbourhoods Strategy 2020 1 Neighbourhood Recommended
    [Show full text]
  • City of Toronto — Detached Homes Average Price by Percentage Increase: January to June 2016
    City of Toronto — Detached Homes Average price by percentage increase: January to June 2016 C06 – $1,282,135 C14 – $2,018,060 1,624,017 C15 698,807 $1,649,510 972,204 869,656 754,043 630,542 672,659 1,968,769 1,821,777 781,811 816,344 3,412,579 763,874 $691,205 668,229 1,758,205 $1,698,897 812,608 *C02 $2,122,558 1,229,047 $890,879 1,149,451 1,408,198 *C01 1,085,243 1,262,133 1,116,339 $1,423,843 E06 788,941 803,251 Less than 10% 10% - 19.9% 20% & Above * 1,716,792 * 2,869,584 * 1,775,091 *W01 13.0% *C01 17.9% E01 12.9% W02 13.1% *C02 15.2% E02 20.0% W03 18.7% C03 13.6% E03 15.2% W04 19.9% C04 13.8% E04 13.5% W05 18.3% C06 26.9% E05 18.7% W06 11.1% C07 29.2% E06 8.9% W07 18.0% *C08 29.2% E07 10.4% W08 10.9% *C09 11.4% E08 7.7% W09 6.1% *C10 25.9% E09 16.2% W10 18.2% *C11 7.9% E10 20.1% C12 18.2% E11 12.4% C13 36.4% C14 26.4% C15 31.8% Compared to January to June 2015 Source: RE/MAX Hallmark, Toronto Real Estate Board Market Watch *Districts that recorded less than 100 sales were discounted to prevent the reporting of statistical anomalies R City of Toronto — Neighbourhoods by TREB District WEST W01 High Park, South Parkdale, Swansea, Roncesvalles Village W02 Bloor West Village, Baby Point, The Junction, High Park North W05 W03 Keelesdale, Eglinton West, Rockcliffe-Smythe, Weston-Pellam Park, Corso Italia W10 W04 York, Glen Park, Amesbury (Brookhaven), Pelmo Park – Humberlea, Weston, Fairbank (Briar Hill-Belgravia), Maple Leaf, Mount Dennis W05 Downsview, Humber Summit, Humbermede (Emery), Jane and Finch W09 W04 (Black Creek/Glenfield-Jane
    [Show full text]
  • “Keeping the Kids out of Trouble”: Extra-Domestic Labour and Social Reproduction in Toronto’S Regent Park, 1959-2012
    “KEEPING THE KIDS OUT OF TROUBLE”: EXTRA-DOMESTIC LABOUR AND SOCIAL REPRODUCTION IN TORONTO’S REGENT PARK, 1959-2012 RYAN K. JAMES A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY GRADUATE PROGRAM IN SOCIAL ANTHROPOLOGY YORK UNIVERSITY TORONTO, ONTARIO May 2017 © Ryan K. James, 2017 Abstract This dissertation is an historical ethnography of social reproduction in Regent Park, Canada’s first public housing project. Built from 1948 to 1959 as part of a modernist ‘slum clearance’ initiative, Regent Park was deemed a failure soon after it opened and was then stigmatised for decades thereafter, both for being a working-class enclave and for epitomising an outdated approach to city planning. A second redevelopment began in 2005, whereby the project is being demolished and rebuilt as a mix of subsidised and market housing, retail space, and other amenities. Despite its enduring stigmatisation, however, many current and former residents retain positive memories of Regent Park. Participants in this study tended to refer to it as a ‘community’, indicating senses of shared ownership and belonging that residents themselves built in everyday life. This dissertation emphasises the capacity of working-class people to build and maintain ‘community’ on their own terms, and in spite of multiple and intersecting constraints. To theorise community-building, I begin from the concept of social reproduction: the work of maintaining and replenishing stable living conditions, both day-to-day and across generations. Much of this work is domestic labour – unpaid tasks done inside the household such as cooking, cleaning, and raising children.
    [Show full text]
  • Experiences of Socio-Spatial Exclusion Among Ghanaian Immigrant Youth in Toronto: a Case Study of the Jane-Finch Neighbourhood
    Western University Scholarship@Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository 6-28-2012 12:00 AM Experiences of Socio-Spatial Exclusion Among Ghanaian Immigrant Youth in Toronto: A Case Study of the Jane-Finch Neighbourhood Mariama Zaami The University of Western Ontario Supervisor Godwin Arku The University of Western Ontario Joint Supervisor Joseph Mensah The University of Western Ontario Graduate Program in Geography A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree in Master of Arts © Mariama Zaami 2012 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd Part of the Human Geography Commons Recommended Citation Zaami, Mariama, "Experiences of Socio-Spatial Exclusion Among Ghanaian Immigrant Youth in Toronto: A Case Study of the Jane-Finch Neighbourhood" (2012). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 604. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/604 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EXPERIENCES OF SOCIO-SPATIAL EXCLUSION AMONG GHANAIAN IMMIGRANT YOUTH IN TORONTO: A CASE STUDY OF THE JANE andFINCH NEIGHBOURHOOD (Spine Title: Socio-Spatial Exclusion among Ghanaian Immigrant Youth) (Thesis Format: Monograph) by Mariama Zaami Graduate Program in Geography A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts The School of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies Western University London, Ontario, Canada © Mariam Zaami 2012 WESTERN UNIVERSITY School of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies CERTIFICATE OF EXAMINATION Joint-Supervisor Examiners _____________________________________ _______________________________ Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Orking Rough, Living Poor
    Working Rough, Living Poor Employment and Income Insecurities faced by Racialized Groups and their Impacts on Health Published by Access Alliance Multicultural Health and Community Services, 2011 Study funded by: To be cited as: Wilson, R.M., P. Landolt, Y.B. Shakya, G. Galabuzi, Z. Zahoorunissa, D. Pham, F. Cabrera, S. Dahy, and M-P. Joly. (2011). Working Rough, Living Poor: Employment and Income Insecurities Faced by Racialized Groups in the Black Creek Area and their Impacts on Health. Toronto: Access Alliance Multicultural Health and Community Services. The content for this report was collaboratively analyzed and written by the core team of the Income Security, Race and Health research working group. The research was designed and implemented with valuable feedback from all our Advisory Committee members and other community partners (see list in Acknowledgement section) The views expressed in this report do not necessarily represent the views of The Wellesley Institute or the Metcalf Foundation. Requests for permission and copies of this report should be addressed to: Access Alliance Multicultural Health and Community Services 500-340 College Street Toronto, ON M5S 3G3 Telephone: (416) 324-8677 Fax: (416) 324-9074 www.accessalliance.ca © 2011 Access Alliance Multicultural Health and Community Services About the Income Security, Race and Health Research Working Group The Income Security, Race and Health (ISRH) Research Working Group is a interdisciplinary research group comprising of academics, service providers, and peer researchers interested in examining racialized economic and health inequalities. The group was established in Toronto in 2006 under the leadership of Access Alliance. The key goals of the ISRH team are to investigate the systemic causes of growing racialized inequalities in employment and income, and to document the health impacts of these inequalities.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Regent Park What Will Happen When Regent Park Gets Revitalized?
    Catch da Flava January 2005 www.catchdaflava.com Volume 10 Issue 1 Youth and Student Newspaper Produced by the Regent Park Focus From Rags to Riches: The New Regent Park What will happen when Regent Park gets revitalized? The Regent Park revitalization is an incredibly complex issue. We’ve been to the meetings, we’ve read the plans, and the following article reflects da Catch da Flava’s understanding of what is going to happen. n 1949, Canada's largest community housing project was undertaken in Toronto. Developers Ienvisioned Regent Park as an open grassy set- ting with wide parks bounded by buildings that would provide a pretty and affordable place for low-income families to live. Unfortunately, reality didn't quite mea- sure up to the dream. Even though Regent Park did indeed become a cosier community, there were several unforeseen consequences. In addition to giving families an idyllic place to spend their time, the buildings and parks isolated community mem- bers from the surrounding neighbourhoods and prevented the growth and development of busi- nesses, shops and other services commonly found in a healthy vibrant community. Furthermore, lack of stable and ongoing government investment transformed the once-thought innovative housing complex into a host of neglected and poorly main- tained buildings that have deteriorated beyond worthwhile repair. These are just a few of the rea- sons why in June 2003, the Toronto City Council voted 35 against 1 for the redevelopment of the The TCHC is planning to start rebuilding Regent Park later this year. Many residents Regent Park area.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating the Effects of Tenure Mix in Toronto's Regent Park Community
    THE EFFECTS OF TENURE MIX IN TORONTO’S REGENT PARK COMMUNITY INVESTIGATING THE EFFECTS OF TENURE MIX IN TORONTO’S REGENT PARK COMMUNITY By DANIEL J. ROWE, B.A. (Hons.) A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts McMaster University © Copyright by Daniel J. Rowe September 2012 McMaster University MASTER OF ARTS (2012) Hamilton, Ontario (Health, Aging & Society) TITLE: Investigating The Effects of Tenure Mix In Toronto’s Regent Park AUTHOR: Daniel J. Rowe, B.A. (Hons.) (McMaster University) SUPERVISOR: Dr. J. R. Dunn NUMBER OF PAGES: vii; 160 ii Abstract Policies of tenure mix have been widely adopted in many industrialized nations and are often justified as a means of attenuating the detrimental effects of concentrated urban poverty. In this thesis, the case of Toronto’s Regent Park community is examined. It is the first large-scale mixed tenure redevelopment of a publicly subsidized housing community in Canada. Using a series of 24 semi-structured qualitative interviews with residents from both tenures, I examine their experience of living in a mixed tenure community and gauge their support for policies of tenure mix more generally. Broader determinants of residential satisfaction in the neighbourhood are also examined. The redeveloped Regent Park is considered to be a relatively safe, convivial, well-serviced, well-situated, and aesthetically pleasing neighbourhood by individuals from both tenures. Further, participants from both tenures expressed support for the ostensible goals of the redevelopment. Resident experiences diverge significantly by tenure with regard to their satisfaction with the management and maintenance of their buildings.
    [Show full text]
  • 923466Magazine1final
    www.globalvillagefestival.ca Global Village Festival 2015 Publisher: Silk Road Publishing Founder: Steve Moghadam General Manager: Elly Achack Production Manager: Bahareh Nouri Team: Mike Mahmoudian, Sheri Chahidi, Parviz Achak, Eva Okati, Alexander Fairlie Jennifer Berry, Tony Berry Phone: 416-500-0007 Email: offi[email protected] Web: www.GlobalVillageFestival.ca Front Cover Photo Credit: © Kone | Dreamstime.com - Toronto Skyline At Night Photo Contents 08 Greater Toronto Area 49 Recreation in Toronto 78 Toronto sports 11 History of Toronto 51 Transportation in Toronto 88 List of sports teams in Toronto 16 Municipal government of Toronto 56 Public transportation in Toronto 90 List of museums in Toronto 19 Geography of Toronto 58 Economy of Toronto 92 Hotels in Toronto 22 History of neighbourhoods in Toronto 61 Toronto Purchase 94 List of neighbourhoods in Toronto 26 Demographics of Toronto 62 Public services in Toronto 97 List of Toronto parks 31 Architecture of Toronto 63 Lake Ontario 99 List of shopping malls in Toronto 36 Culture in Toronto 67 York, Upper Canada 42 Tourism in Toronto 71 Sister cities of Toronto 45 Education in Toronto 73 Annual events in Toronto 48 Health in Toronto 74 Media in Toronto 3 www.globalvillagefestival.ca The Hon. Yonah Martin SENATE SÉNAT L’hon Yonah Martin CANADA August 2015 The Senate of Canada Le Sénat du Canada Ottawa, Ontario Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A4 K1A 0A4 August 8, 2015 Greetings from the Honourable Yonah Martin Greetings from Senator Victor Oh On behalf of the Senate of Canada, sincere greetings to all of the organizers and participants of the I am pleased to extend my warmest greetings to everyone attending the 2015 North York 2015 North York Festival.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D: Violence Reduction Program Update
    Item 7 - Chief Operating Officer's Report on Tenant Services and Initiatives TSC Public Meeting - November 24, 2020 Item Report:TSC:2020-43 Page 1 of 9 7 - TSC:2020-43 Appendix D: Violence Reduction Program Update At its meeting of June 27, 2019, the TCHC Board of Directors directed staff - to operationalize the VRP. The last update was provided at the December 5, Appendix 2019 TSC meeting. The VRP is focused on improving safety and security for tenants. It is in response to the disproportionate frequency of violence that occurs on TCHC D property, which is rooted in the levels of poverty, addiction, mental health needs and street-involvement present in the TCHC tenant population. Due to the complex nature of the ten identified high needs communities, the VRP includes enhanced enforcement activity through a dedicated and on- site Community Safety Unit (“CSU”) presence, in collaboration with Toronto Police Service (“TPS”), as well economic development and community and social supports in collaboration with the City of Toronto. The program will be implemented through the regions under the Community Safety and Support Pillar and work with integrated hub teams to support local community safety initiatives. Implementation Status Economic Development and Social Supports The Operations Team, led by the Manager of Community Safety and Support in the Central Region, has worked closely with Social Development, Finance and Administration (“SDFA”) to design a fulsome approach to providing economic development and social support related to community safety. The following actions are underway: • Three Memorandums of Understanding (“MOUs”) were developed and signed by TCHC and SDFA.
    [Show full text]
  • Residents & Agencies Working & Learning Together Bepart
    Residents & Agencies Working & Learning Together BePart Collaborative Research Report BePart Steering Committee March 2010 Lawrence Heights Inter-Organizational Network (LHION) The Wellesley Institute advances urban health through rigorous research, pragmatic policy solutions, social innovation, and community action. The Wellesley Institute’s Enabling Grants programs supports community agencies and providers to collaboratively pursue research on issues that urban communities identify as important. These may include identifying unmet needs, exploring or testing effective solutions to problems they experience, or increasing our understanding of the forces that shape people's health and the way these forces affect people's health. The Wellesley Institute’s strategic focus is Health Equity, and we work in diverse collaborations and partnerships for social innovation, progressive social change, policy alternatives, and solutions to pressing issues of urban health and health equity. Copies of this report can be downloaded from the Wellesley Institute’s website www.wellesleyinstitute.com This project was funded by the Wellesley Institute (WI) as well as select agency members of the Lawrence Heights Inter-Organizational Network (LHION). The views and opinions expressed in the paper are those of the BePart Steering Committee and do not necessarily reflect those of the Wellesley Institute or LHION or LHION agency members. Lawrence Heights Inter-Organizational Network (LHION) Residents and Agencies Working and Learning Together: BePart Collaborative Research Report by the BePart Steering Committee (March 2010) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 2.5 Canada License. What does this license mean? Attribution = You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).
    [Show full text]
  • Photovoice Project by Residents of Black Creek Acknowledgements About ‘Exposed’ Photovoice Project
    using photography to expose the social impacts eXposed of poverty and racism in Black Creek a photovoice project by residents of Black Creek Acknowledgements About ‘Exposed’ Photovoice Project The ‘Exposed’ Photovoice project is a community- false sense of safety and security. Photo-researchers This project would not have been possible without the based, arts-informed research project conducted in also captured the ‘neglect’ and disinvestment in successful collaboration and support of numerous community 2008 by the Income Security, Race and Health (ISRH) the Black Creek area by government agencies and members, advocates, volunteers and organizations. Our warm research working group of Toronto. The main goal of their failure to provide adequate garbage collection thanks to our generous funders: Metcalf Foundation, The the project was to use an arts-based research method services and properly maintain public spaces and Wellesley Institute, Toronto Arts Council, and the Ontario Arts called photovoice to ‘expose’ the social impacts of facilities in the neighborhood. The deteriorating Council. Thank you to Black Creek Community Health Centre poverty on low-income families. The project was and substandard condition of housing in the for providing child care and meeting space, and to Working located in Black Creek – a low-income area located in neighborhood is also highlighted through the Women Community Centre for their support in recruitment the north-west inner suburb of Toronto. photos and narratives. Photo-researchers also made and arranging space in Seneca College to hold our weekly innovative use of photos and narratives to express photovoice sessions. Special thanks to Mohamed The Exposed photovoice project was led by Ruth what certain signs in the neighborhood mean to Abdelrahim, Community Outreach Worker for the Exposed Wilson and Dr Yogendra B.
    [Show full text]