DOCSLIB.ORG

Handbook for New Jersey Assessors

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Handbook for New Jersey Assessors Handbook For New Jersey Assessors PHIL MURPHY, Governor ELIZABETH MAHER MUOIO, State Treasurer Issued by Property Administration – Local Property Division of Taxation – Department of the Treasury State of New Jersey Trenton, New Jersey Revised April 2021 April 2021 April 2021 April 2021 April 2021 New Jersey Property Taxpayers’ Bill of Rights P.L. 2017, c.128 N.J.S.A. 54:1-2.1 Overview The Property Taxpayers’ Bill of Rights ensures that: 1. All property taxpayers are accorded the basic rights of fair and equitable treatment under the State Constitution and laws of New Jersey; 2. All property taxpayers receive the information and assistance they need to understand and meet their property tax responsibilities. Services to Property Taxpayers As a property taxpayer, you have the right to obtain information explained in simple, nontechnical terms about: Your responsibilities and rights as a property owner and property taxpayer; Your real property assessment and how it is determined and calculated; Your right to appeal and how to appeal an assessment you believe is incorrect as to your property or as to another property in the same county and the time limits involved; Your right, in the context of a property tax appeal, to view the property record card of other real property in the municipality. Responsiveness You have the right to expect questions will be responded to within a reasonable amount of time. Statements and Notices You have the right to expect all notices you receive will clearly identify the purpose of the communication and the proper procedure when responding. For More Information Many Local Property Tax forms and publications are available on the Division of Taxation’s website at: www.state.nj.us/treasury/taxation/. Required Website Posting The Property Taxpayers’ Bill of Rights must be posted on the webpage of each county board of taxation and each municipality in the State having an internet webpage. April 2021 April 2021 April 2021 April 2021 2020 Assessors’ Handbook Updates Chapter 1 No updates. Chapter 2 201.04 NJ Constitution, Article VIII, Section 1, Par. 3. Amended effective December 5, 2019, Exemptions to Honorably Discharged Veterans. Chapter 3 No updates. Chapter 4 402.04 Ownerships Defined, Continuing Care Retirement Communities. 405.06 Modified as per Public Law 2019, chapter 413 because active service “in time of war” is no longer required 405.07 Modified as per Public Law 2019, chapter 413 because active service “in time of war” is no longer required. 405.09 Eligible Ownership for residents of Continuing Care Retirement Communities. 407.02 E-benefits web portal for VA Benefits information. 407.03 Revision of Form DVSSE due to the veteran’s confidential health information. Chapter 5 No updates. Chapter 6 607.01 added “Instructions for plotting the description of a parcel of land.” 608.05 added “Tax Maps: Urban, Suburban, and Rural Areas.” 610.05 added “Illustration of Flood Plains Area Designation.” Chapter 7 No updates. April 2021 Chapter 8 No updates. Chapter 9 903.02 added definition “District wide Reassessment.” Chapter 10 No updates Chapter 11 No updates. April 2021 Table of Contents Chapter 1 Introduction ___________________________43 101. Local Government in New Jersey. _________________________________ 43 101.01 Four Types of Local Government Units. ____________________________________ 43 101.02 County Government. ___________________________________________________ 43 101.03 Classification of Counties. _______________________________________________ 43 101.04 Apportionment of County Costs. __________________________________________ 44 101.05 Municipal Government. _________________________________________________ 44 101.06 Classification of Municipalities. __________________________________________ 45 101.07 Five Types of Municipalities. ____________________________________________ 45 101.08 Forms of Municipal Government. _________________________________________ 45 101.09 School Districts. _______________________________________________________ 49 101.10 Classification of School Districts. _________________________________________ 49 101.11 Apportionment of Regional School District Costs. ____________________________ 51 101.12 Special Districts. ______________________________________________________ 52 101.13 Powers of Counties, Municipalities, School Districts, and Special Districts. _________ 52 102. Local Government Finances. _____________________________________ 53 102.01 Sources of Local Revenue in the United States. ______________________________ 53 103. Sources of Local Revenue in New Jersey. ___________________________ 53 103.01 New Jersey Property Tax Procedure. _______________________________________ 54 104. Legislative Limit on Municipal and County Budget Increases. _________ 55 104.01 Municipal “Budget Caps.” _______________________________________________ 55 104.02 Certification by Assessors. _______________________________________________ 56 104.03 County “Budget Caps.” _________________________________________________ 58 104.04 Certification by County Tax Administrators. _________________________________ 59 104.05 Tax Levy Caps. _______________________________________________________ 59 105. The Position of Assessor. _________________________________________ 60 105.01 General. _____________________________________________________________ 60 105.02 Code of Ethics and Professional Behavior for Assessors. _______________________ 61 105.03 Only One Assessor Position is Authorized for Each Municipality. ________________ 62 105.04 Assessment - Pilot Programs._____________________________________________ 62 105.05 Tax Assessor Certificate (CTA) Required. __________________________________ 65 105.06 Continuing Education. __________________________________________________ 66 105.07 Office of Assessor An Appointed Position. __________________________________ 66 11 April 2021 105.08 Length of Term of Office and Filling Vacancies. _____________________________ 66 105.09 Tenure. ______________________________________________________________ 67 105.10 Municipal Positions and Residency. _______________________________________ 68 105.11 Compensation. ________________________________________________________ 68 105.12 Tax Assessor Certification Program. _______________________________________ 69 105.13 Administration of the Certification Program. ________________________________ 69 105.14 Qualification for Admission to Certified Tax Assessor (C.T.A.) Exam. ____________ 69 105.15 C.T.A. Exam. _________________________________________________________ 70 105.16 Admission to a C.T.A. Exam. ____________________________________________ 70 105.17 Rutgers Training Courses. _______________________________________________ 71 105.18 Issuance of a Tax Assessor Certificate. _____________________________________ 71 105.19 Removal of a Tax Assessor Certificate. _____________________________________ 71 105.20 Removal from Office Non-Civil Service. ___________________________________ 72 105.21 Forfeiture of Office. ____________________________________________________ 72 105.22 Civil Service. _________________________________________________________ 73 105.23 Standardized Classifications for Assessing Position. ___________________________ 73 105.24 Classification. ________________________________________________________ 73 105.25 Other Personnel Services. _______________________________________________ 74 105.26 Removal Under Civil Service. ____________________________________________ 74 105.27 Dual Titles for Assessors (Non-Civil Service, Civil Service). ____________________ 74 105.28 Assessors’ Responsibilities to the Citizens. __________________________________ 75 105.29 Assessors’ Responsibilities to the Municipality. ______________________________ 76 105.30 Assessors’ Responsibilities to the Director of the Division of Taxation. ____________ 76 105.31 Assessors’ Responsibilities to the County Tax Administrator. ___________________ 77 105.32 Assessors to Notify County Tax Administrator When Assuming Office. ___________ 77 105.33 Assessors to Notify County Tax Administrator When Terminating Position. ________ 77 105.34 Assessors to Furnish County Tax Administrator with Schedule of Hours. ___________ 78 105.35 Appointment Resolutions and Assessor Cards.________________________________ 78 106. Conflict of Interest.______________________________________________ 80 106.01 Assessors’ Outside Activities. ____________________________________________ 80 106.02 Assessor Placing a Value on Property in which He/She has an Interest. ____________ 81 107. Joint Municipal Tax Assessor. ____________________________________ 81 107.01 Agreement of Conditions of Operation. _____________________________________ 81 107.02 Approval of Joint Agreement. ____________________________________________ 82 107.03 Apportionment of Costs. ________________________________________________ 82 107.04 Personnel. ____________________________________________________________ 82 107.05 Tenure Lost and Tenure Gained for Joint Municipal Assessor. ___________________ 83 12 April 2021 107.06 Records to be Maintained Separately. ______________________________________ 83 107.07 Termination of Joint Agreement. __________________________________________ 83 108. Interlocal Service Agreements*, Shared Service Agreements, and Consolidated Service Agreements. _________________________________ 84 108.01 Common Sense Shared Services Pilot Program Act. ___________________________ 84 108.02 Pilot Program. ________________________________________________________
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tax Appeals Rules Procedures
    Tax Appeals Tribunal Rules & Procedures The rules of the game February 2017 Glossary of terms KRA Kenya Revenue Authority TAT Tax Appeals Tribunal TATA Tax Appeals Tribunal Act TPA Tax Procedures Act VAT Value Added Tax 2 © Deloitte & Touche 2017 Definition of terms Tax decision means: a) An assessment; Tax law means: b) A determination of tax payable made to a a) The Tax Procedures Act; trustee-in-bankruptcy, receiver, or b) The Income Tax Act, Value Added liquidator; Tax Act, and Excise Duty Act; and c) A determination of the amount that a tax c) Any Regulations or other subsidiary representative, appointed person, legislation made under the Tax director or controlling member is liable Procedures Act or the Income Tax for under specified sections in the TPA; Act, Value Added Tax Act, and Excise d) A decision on an application by a Duty Act. taxpayer to amend their self-assessment return; Objection decision means: e) A refund decision; f) A decision requiring repayment of a The Commissioner’s decision either to refund; or allow an objection in whole or in part, or g) A demand for a penalty. disallow it. Appealable decision means: a) An objection decision; and b) Any other decision made under a tax law but excludes– • A tax decision; or • A decision made in the course of making a tax decision. 3 © Deloitte & Touche 2017 Pre-objection process; management of KRA Audit KRA Audit Notes The TPA allows the Commissioner to issue to • The KRA Audits are a tax payer a default assessment, amended undertaken by different assessment or an advance assessment departments of the KRA that (Section 29 to 31 TPA).
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Census of Governments, State Descriptions: School District Governments and Public School Systems
    NCES 2019 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Education Demographic and Geographic Estimates (EDGE) Program 2017 Census of Governments, State Descriptions: School District Governments and Public School Systems Education Demographic and Geographic Estimates (EDGE) Program 2017 Census of Governments, State Descriptions: School District Governments and Public School Systems JUNE 2019 Doug Geverdt National Center for Education Statistics U.S. Department of Education ii U.S. Department of Education Betsy DeVos Secretary Institute of Education Sciences Mark Schneider Director National Center for Education Statistics James L. Woodworth Commissioner Administrative Data Division Ross Santy Associate Commissioner The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) is the primary federal entity for collecting, analyzing, and reporting data related to education in the United States and other nations. It fulfills a congressional mandate to collect, collate, analyze, and report full and complete statistics on the condition of education in the United States; conduct and publish reports and specialized analyses of the meaning and significance of such statistics; assist state and local education agencies in improving their statistical systems; and review and report on education activities in foreign countries. NCES activities are designed to address high-priority education data needs; provide consistent, reliable, complete, and accurate indicators of education status and trends; and report timely, useful, and high-quality data to the U.S. Department of Education, Congress, states, other education policymakers, practitioners, data users, and the general public. Unless specifically noted, all information contained herein is in the public domain. We strive to make our products available in a variety of formats and in language that is appropriate to a variety of audiences.
    [Show full text]
  • Erie County Municipality Population Changes, 2000 to 2017
    Erie County Municipality Population Changes, 2000 to 2017 August, 2018 Erie County Department of Health 606 West 2nd Street Erie, PA 16507 Telephone: 814-451-6700 Website: ECDH This report was prepared by Jeff Quirk, Epidemiologist ([email protected]). The primary sources of data and information for this report are the Erie County Department of Health and the United States Census Bureau. Background: From 2000 to 2010, Erie County’s population remained level at around 280,000 residents. However, since 2010 the county’s population fell by over 6,000 residents, with losses occurring for the past five consecutive years (Figure 1). This report details the population changes that have taken place among the county’s 38 municipalities for the period 2000-2017. Figure 1 284,000 281,502 282,000 281,288 280,843 280,566 280,647 280,000 279,351 278,111 278,000 276,321 Population 276,000 274,541 274,000 272,000 2000 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Erie County’s 38 municipalities include 2 cities, 14 boroughs, and 22 townships. These municipalities vary greatly in total population and size (land area). In 2017, municipality populations ranged from a low of 209 residents in Elgin Borough to a high of 97,369 in the City of Erie, while land areas ranged from a low of 0.3 square miles in Wattsburg Borough to a high of 50.0 in Waterford Township. From an overall numbers perspective, 12 municipalities increased in population since 2000 (Table 1, Figure 2). Harborcreek Township experienced the largest gain with an increase of 2,225 residents.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenge of Defining a National Urban Strategy in the Context of Divergent Demographic Trends in Small and Large Canadian Cities
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Western Washington University The challenge of defining a national urban strategy in the context of divergent demographic trends in small and large Canadian cities Gilles Viaud, Department of Geography, CURA – Quality of life indicator researcher, Thompson Rivers University, Kamloops, British Columbia, Canada, V2C 5N3. Email: [email protected] Abstract: Once forgotten as an object of research, a growing literature dealing with various aspects of small cities has emerged since the new millennium. The answer to the question “does size matter?” has so far received positive empirical support on both sides of the Atlantic. Using the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) three quality of life studies as backdrop, this paper offers further evidence that small Canadian cities are worth our attention. Since 1999, FCM has extrapolated results from its series of quality of life studies carried out on a sample of large and medium sized cities to monitor key changes in the quality of life of Canadian urban residents. Conclusions drawn from these studies have been used to define a common Canadian municipal agenda which identifies air pollution, public transportation, affordable housing, homelessness, social inclusion and integration, and community safety and security as some of Canada’s key urban policy priorities. Following the evolution of a number of key demographic indicators in larger and smaller Canadian cities between 1996 and 2006, this research questions whether the municipal agenda derived from FCM’s quality of life studies offers a fair and just reflection of the reality and of the public policy priorities of smaller urban municipalities.
    [Show full text]
  • County Regulation of Land Use and Development
    Volume 9 Issue 2 Spring 1969 Spring 1969 County Regulation of Land Use and Development Edward C. Walterscheid Recommended Citation Edward C. Walterscheid, County Regulation of Land Use and Development, 9 Nat. Resources J. 266 (1969). Available at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/vol9/iss2/9 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Natural Resources Journal by an authorized editor of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. COUNTY REGULATION OF LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT In New Mexico, a county is "a body corporate and politic."' It should not be equated with a municipal corporation, being in the strictest sense distinguishable from such a corporation, but rather is more correctly termed a quasi-municipal corporation. It has only such powers as are expressly or impliedly given to it by constitutional or legislative provisions. 3 As originally adopted in 1911, the New Mexico Constitution was silent as to the powers of counties. In the ensuing years it has been amended to allow for the formation of two special types of counties constitutionally having powers at least as broad as those of municipalities. 4 However, only one specialized county has yet been authorized 4a-and no others appear likely in the near future-so that with this one exception all counties existing for the next few years are likely to remain dependent on legislative grants for their powers.5 By statute, all counties are empowered: First.
    [Show full text]
  • Transfer of Ownership Guidelines
    Transfer of Ownership Guidelines PREPARED BY THE MICHIGAN STATE TAX COMMISSION Issued October 30, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Background Information 3 Transfer of Ownership Definitions 4 Deeds and Land Contracts 4 Trusts 5 Distributions Under Wills or By Courts 8 Leases 10 Ownership Changes of Legal Entities (Corporations, Partnerships, Limited Liability Companies, etc.) 11 Tenancies in Common 12 Cooperative Housing Corporations 13 Transfer of Ownership Exemptions 13 Spouses 14 Children and Other Relatives 15 Tenancies by the Entireties 18 Life Leases/Life Estates 19 Foreclosures and Forfeitures 23 Redemptions of Tax-Reverted Properties 24 Trusts 25 Court Orders 26 Joint Tenancies 27 Security Interests 33 Affiliated Groups 34 Normal Public Trades 35 Commonly Controlled Entities 35 Tax-Free Reorganizations 37 Qualified Agricultural Properties 38 Conservation Easements 41 Boy Scout, Girl Scout, Camp Fire Girls 4-H Clubs or Foundations, YMCA and YWCA 42 Property Transfer Affidavits 42 Partial Uncapping Situations 45 Delayed Uncappings 46 Background Information Why is a transfer of ownership significant with regard to property taxes? In accordance with the Michigan Constitution as amended by Michigan statutes, a transfer of ownership causes the taxable value of the transferred property to be uncapped in the calendar year following the year of the transfer of ownership. What is meant by “taxable value”? Taxable value is the value used to calculate the property taxes for a property. In general, the taxable value multiplied by the appropriate millage rate yields the property taxes for a property. What is meant by “taxable value uncapping”? Except for additions and losses to a property, annual increases in the property’s taxable value are limited to 1.05 or the inflation rate, whichever is less.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cost of the Vote: Poll Taxes, Voter Identification Laws, and the Price of Democracy
    File: Ellis final for Darby Created on: 4/9/2009 8:17:00 PM Last Printed: 5/19/2009 1:10:00 PM THE COST OF THE VOTE: POLL TAXES, VOTER IDENTIFICATION LAWS, AND THE PRICE OF DEMOCRACY ATIBA R. ELLIS† INTRODUCTION The election of Barack Obama as the forty-fourth President of the United States represents both the completion of a historical campaign season and a triumph of the Civil Rights revolution of the twentieth cen- tury. President Obama’s 2008 campaign, along with the campaigns of Senators Hillary Rodham Clinton and John McCain, was remarkable in both the identities of the politicians themselves1 and the attention they brought to the political process. In particular, Obama attracted voters from populations which have not been traditionally represented in na- tional politics. His run was hallmarked, in large part, by significant grassroots fundraising, a concerted effort to generate popular appeal, and, most important, massive voter turnout efforts.2 As a result, this election cycle generated significant increases in participation during the primary season.3 Turnout in the general election did not meet anticipated record † Legal Writing Instructor, Howard University School of Law. J.D., M.A., Duke Univer- sity, 2000. An early version of this paper was presented at the Writer’s Workshop of the Legal Writing Institute in summer 2007. Later versions were presented at the November 2007 Howard University School of Law faculty colloquy and the September 2008 Northeast People of Color Legal Scholarship Conference. I gratefully acknowledge Andrew Taslitz, Sherman Rogers, Derek Black, Paulette Caldwell, Phoebe Haddon, and Daniel Tokaji for their thoughtful comments on earlier drafts of this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Military and Veterans' Affairs
    ANALYSIS OF THE NEW JERSEY BUDGET DEPARTMENT OF MILITARY AND VETERANS’ AFFAIRS FISCAL YEAR 2017-2018 PREPARED BY OFFICE OF LEGISLATIVE SERVICES NEW JERSEY LEGISLATURE • MAY 2017 NEW JERSEY STATE LEGISLATURE SENATE BUDGET AND APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE Paul A. Sarlo (D), 36th District (Parts of Bergen and Passaic), Chair Brian P. Stack (D), 33rd District (Part of Hudson), Vice-Chair Jennifer Beck (R), 11th District (Part of Monmouth) Anthony R. Bucco (R), 25th District (Parts of Morris and Somerset) Nilsa Cruz-Perez (D), 5th District (Parts of Camden and Gloucester) Sandra B. Cunningham (D), 31st District (Part of Hudson) Patrick J. Diegnan Jr. (D), 18th District (Part of Middlesex) Linda R. Greenstein (D), 14th District (Parts of Mercer and Middlesex) Steven V. Oroho (R), 24th District (All of Sussex, and parts of Morris and Warren) Kevin J. O'Toole (R), 40th District (Parts of Bergen, Essex, Morris and Passaic) M. Teresa Ruiz (D), 29th District (Part of Essex) Samuel D. Thompson (R), 12th District (Parts of Burlington, Middlesex, Monmouth and Ocean) Jeff Van Drew (D), 1st District (All of Cape May, and parts of Atlantic and Cumberland) GENERAL ASSEMBLY BUDGET COMMITTEE Gary S. Schaer (D), 36th District (Parts of Bergen and Passaic), Chair John J. Burzichelli (D), 3rd District (All of Salem, parts of Cumberland and Gloucester), Vice-Chair Anthony M. Bucco (R), 25th District (Parts of Morris and Somerset) John DiMaio (R), 23rd District (Parts of Hunterdon, Somerset and Warren) Gordon M. Johnson (D), 37th District (Part of Bergen) John F. McKeon (D), 27th District (Parts of Essex and Morris) Raj Mukherji (D), 33rd District (Part of Hudson) Elizabeth Maher Muoio (D), 15th District (Parts of Hunterdon and Mercer) Declan J.
    [Show full text]
  • CREATING an AMERICAN PROPERTY LAW: ALIENABILITY and ITS LIMITS in AMERICAN HISTORY Claire Priest
    CREATING AN AMERICAN PROPERTY LAW: ALIENABILITY AND ITS LIMITS IN AMERICAN HISTORY Claire Priest Contact Information: Northwestern University School of Law 357 East Chicago Ave. Chicago, IL 60611 Phone: (312) 503-4470 Email: [email protected] Acknowledgements: ∗Associate Professor of Law, Northwestern University School of Law. B.A., J.D., Ph.D. Yale University. I would like to thank James McMasters of Northwestern’s Law Library for his help in finding copies of many of the primary sources used to write this Article. For extremely valuable comments and suggestions, I would like to thank Bernard Bailyn, Stuart Banner, Kenworthey Bilz, Charlotte Crane, David Dana, Michele Landis Dauber, Christine Desan, Tony A. Freyer, Morton J. Horwitz, Daniel Hulsebosch, Stanley N. Katz, Daniel M. Klerman, Naomi Lamoreaux, Charles W. McCurdy, Edmund S. Morgan, Janice Nadler, Sarah Pearsall, Dylan Penningroth, George L. Priest, Richard J. Ross, Emma Rothschild, Dhananjai Shivakumar, Kenneth L. Sokoloff, Vicky Saker Woeste, Gavin Wright and the seminar participants at Northwestern University School of Law’s Faculty Workshop, Stanford Law School’s Faculty Workshop, UCLA’s Legal History Colloquium and Economic History Workshop, NYU’s Legal History Colloquium, the University of Florida Fredric G. Levin College of Law’s Faculty Workshop, the Chicago Legal History Seminar, the American Society for Legal History’s Annual Meeting, the University of Illinois College of Law’s Faculty Workshop, the Omohundro Institute of Early American History’s Annual Conference, and Harvard University’s Conference on Atlantic Legalities. The Julius Rosenthal Fund at Northwestern University School of Law provided generous research support. CREATING AN AMERICAN PROPERTY LAW: ALIENABILITY AND ITS LIMITS IN AMERICAN HISTORY This Article analyzes an issue central to the economic and political development of the early United States: laws protecting real property from the claims of creditors.
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Ownership and Property in the Person: Democratization and a Tale of Two Concepts*
    The Journal of Political Philosophy: Volume 10, Number 1, 2002, pp. 20±53 Self-Ownership and Property in the Person: Democratization and a Tale of Two Concepts* CAROLE PATEMAN Political Science, University of California at Los Angeles Democracy is at war with the renting of human beings, not with private property. David Ellerman URING the 1990s a number of political philosophers turned their attention Dto the concept of self-ownership. Much of the discussion is critical of libertarianism,1 a political theory that goes hand-in-hand with neo-liberal economic doctrines and global policies of structural adjustment and privatization. Attracta Ingram's A Political Theory of Rights and G. A. Cohen's Self-Ownership, Freedom, and Equality are devoted to such criticism Uand I shall focus much of my argument on their books2). The consensus among most participants in the debate is that self-ownership is merely a way of talking about autonomy, but Ingram and Cohen go against the tide by arguing that the idea is inimical to autonomy and that an alternative is needed. In The Sexual Contract I am also critical of libertarianism, and my conclusion is similar to Ingram's and Cohen's. I argue that the idea of property in the person must be relinquished if a more free and democratic social and political order is to be created. However, despite some common concerns, there are very few points at which my work and that of Cohen and Ingram, or of most contributors to the current debates about self-ownership, come together. In large part this is because property in the person, not self-ownership, is central to my analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development
    Journal of Agribusiness pISSN 1899-5241 eISSN 1899-5772 and Rural Development www.jard.edu.pl 4(34) 2014, 159-171 PERPETUAL USUFRUCT OF AGRICULTURAL LANDS – SELECTED LEGAL AND FINANCIAL ISSUES Aneta Suchoń Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań Abstract. The article makes an attempt to determine whether the legal regulations provide a perpetual lessee with, first of all, stable conditions to hold agricultural lands and to run a business activity on these lands and, second of all, whether the regulations make it easi- er for perpetual lessees to acquire the right to own the lands they possess. The first part of the article concentrates on the legal nature of perpetual usufruct as well as the rights and financial obligations of a perpetual lessee. Then, the paper focuses on the transformation of perpetual usufruct into the right of ownership and the expiry of perpetual usufruct. Next, the article analyses the issue of a perpetual lessee as an agricultural producer. At the end, the Author states that perpetual lessee possesses a wide range of rights and can freely run an agricultural activity on agricultural lands. The legislator has acknowledged perpet- ual usufruct, along with the most popular forms of holding lands such as ownership and lease, to be a stable element of rural relations. Thus, a perpetual lessee can be granted the European funds, agricultural tax reliefs and insurance in KRUS. Key words: perpetual usufruct, agricultural lands, agricultural activity, EU funds INTRODUCTION For each agricultural producer it is essential to possess lands in an autonomous and stable way in order to ensure uninterrupted course of an agricultural activity.
    [Show full text]
  • American Law Institute Cle Eminent Domain and Land Valuation Litigation Keynote Address: “Property Rights: Foundation for a Free Society”
    AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE CLE EMINENT DOMAIN AND LAND VALUATION LITIGATION KEYNOTE ADDRESS: “PROPERTY RIGHTS: FOUNDATION FOR A FREE SOCIETY” PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA JANUARY 24, 2019 KEYNOTE ADDRESS SPEAKER W. Taylor Reveley, III, President Emeritus of William & Mary, and John Stewart Bryan Professor of Jurisprudence Emeritus at William & Mary Law School* Friends, let’s think back to September 1787. Our country’s Consti- tutional Convention was nearing its end in Philadelphia when a formidable woman encountered Benjamin Franklin, a delegate to the Convention.1 She braced him with this question: “Well[,] Doctor[,] what have we got[,] a republic or a monarchy[?]”2 The wise, old, battle- tested Franklin replied simply: “A republic . if you can keep it.”3 So, friends, we have a republic if we can keep it. We have a free so- ciety if we can keep it. Just what role do property rights—the freedom to acquire and govern our assets—play in nurturing our republic and our society? It is the rare American these days who doesn’t feel that our coun- try’s civic life and democratic institutions have gotten pretty ragged, and our political and social fabric dangerously frayed. This feeling runs across the political and cultural spectrum from citizens who find Donald Trump and Fox News the “be all and end all” to those who sit at the feet of Nancy Pelosi or Bernie Sanders, aided and abetted by CNN and MSNBC. Perhaps the citizens most concerned about the sad state of our political and social fabric are those who fall be- tween these two poles, hoping everyone will take a deep breath, cool the invective, and get on with the work at hand.
    [Show full text]