DOCSLIB.ORG

Cosmological Unification of String Theories

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cosmological Unification of String Theories Cosmological Unification of String Theories Simeon Hellerman based on : hep-th/0611317, S.H. and Ian Swanson hep-th/0612051, S.H. and Ian Swanson hep-th/0612116, S.H. and Ian Swanson arXiv:0705.0980, S.H. and Ian Swanson arXiv:0709.2166, S.H. and Ian Swanson arXiv:0710.1628, S.H. and Ian Swanson and work in progress Strings 2008, CERN, Geneva, August 22, 2008 Outline Bosonic string solutions with nonzero tachyon Dimension-changing solutions in the bosonic string Transitions from type 0 to type II string theory Lightlike tachyon condensation in Type 0 Other examples Conclusions Cosmological Unification of String Theories Simeon Hellerman based on : hep-th/0611317, S.H. and Ian Swanson hep-th/0612051, S.H. and Ian Swanson hep-th/0612116, S.H. and Ian Swanson arXiv:0705.0980, S.H. and Ian Swanson arXiv:0709.2166, S.H. and Ian Swanson arXiv:0710.1628, S.H. and Ian Swanson and work in progress Strings 2008, CERN, Geneva, August 22, 2008 Outline Bosonic string solutions with nonzero tachyon Dimension-changing solutions in the bosonic string Transitions from type 0 to type II string theory Lightlike tachyon condensation in Type 0 Other examples Conclusions Introduction We understand THIS very well: Introduction We understand THIS very well: We also understand perturbations by weak SUSY breaking – Introduction We understand THIS very well: Introduction We understand THIS very well: We also understand perturbations by weak SUSY breaking – Introduction We understand THIS very well: We also understand perturbations by weak SUSY breaking – ! Anti-D-branes Introduction We understand THIS very well: We also understand perturbations by weak SUSY breaking – ! Anti-D-branes ! Fluxes Introduction We understand THIS very well: We also understand perturbations by weak SUSY breaking – ! Anti-D-branes Introduction We understand THIS very well: We also understand perturbations by weak SUSY breaking – ! Anti-D-branes ! Fluxes Introduction We understand THIS very well: We also understand perturbations by weak SUSY breaking – ! Anti-D-branes ! Fluxes We don’t yet understand strong SUSY breaking very well! Introduction GOALS: ! Understand cosmology and strong time dependence Introduction We understand THIS very well: We also understand perturbations by weak SUSY breaking – ! Anti-D-branes ! Fluxes We don’t yet understand strong SUSY breaking very well! Introduction GOALS: ! Understand cosmology and strong time dependence Introduction GOALS: ! Understand cosmology and strong time dependence ! Understand strong SUSY breaking Introduction GOALS: ! Understand cosmology and strong time dependence ! Understand strong SUSY breaking ! Understand connections between string theories – each of the possible 10500 universes should contain all the others! Introduction GOALS: ! Understand cosmology and strong time dependence ! Understand strong SUSY breaking Introduction GOALS: ! Understand cosmology and strong time dependence ! Understand strong SUSY breaking ! Understand connections between string theories – each of the possible 10500 universes should contain all the others! Introduction GOALS: ! Understand cosmology and strong time dependence ! Understand strong SUSY breaking ! Understand connections between string theories – each of the possible 10500 universes should contain all the others! Each of these questions is related to the others –ifweunderstand one, we will understand all of them. Introduction GOALS: ! Understand cosmology and strong time dependence ! Understand strong SUSY breaking ! Understand connections between string theories – each of the possible 10500 universes should contain all the others! Each of these questions is related to the others –ifweunderstand one, we will understand all of them. What are the simplest concrete models of connections and transitions? Introduction GOALS: ! Understand cosmology and strong time dependence ! Understand strong SUSY breaking ! Understand connections between string theories – each of the possible 10500 universes should contain all the others! Each of these questions is related to the others –ifweunderstand one, we will understand all of them. Introduction GOALS: ! Understand cosmology and strong time dependence ! Understand strong SUSY breaking ! Understand connections between string theories – each of the possible 10500 universes should contain all the others! Each of these questions is related to the others –ifweunderstand one, we will understand all of them. What are the simplest concrete models of connections and transitions? What I will describe today What I will describe today ! Aclassofα!-exact classical solutions of string theory What I will describe today What I will describe today ! Aclassofα!-exact classical solutions of string theory What I will describe today ! Aclassofα!-exact classical solutions of string theory ! With D not necessarily equal to 10 or 26 What I will describe today ! Aclassofα!-exact classical solutions of string theory ! With D not necessarily equal to 10 or 26 ! D changes dynamically What I will describe today ! Aclassofα!-exact classical solutions of string theory ! With D not necessarily equal to 10 or 26 What I will describe today ! Aclassofα!-exact classical solutions of string theory ! With D not necessarily equal to 10 or 26 ! D changes dynamically What I will describe today ! Aclassofα!-exact classical solutions of string theory ! With D not necessarily equal to 10 or 26 ! D changes dynamically ! Spacetime SUSY changes dynamically What I will describe today ! Aclassofα!-exact classical solutions of string theory ! With D not necessarily equal to 10 or 26 ! D changes dynamically ! Spacetime SUSY changes dynamically ! Worldsheet SUSY changes dynamically What I will describe today ! Aclassofα!-exact classical solutions of string theory ! With D not necessarily equal to 10 or 26 ! D changes dynamically ! Spacetime SUSY changes dynamically What I will describe today ! Aclassofα!-exact classical solutions of string theory ! With D not necessarily equal to 10 or 26 ! D changes dynamically ! Spacetime SUSY changes dynamically ! Worldsheet SUSY changes dynamically What I will describe today ! Aclassofα!-exact classical solutions of string theory ! With D not necessarily equal to 10 or 26 ! D changes dynamically ! Spacetime SUSY changes dynamically ! Worldsheet SUSY changes dynamically ! All involve closed string tachyon condensation, treated exactly in α! and in the tachyon strength. What I will describe today ! Aclassofα!-exact classical solutions of string theory ! With D not necessarily equal to 10 or 26 ! D changes dynamically ! Spacetime SUSY changes dynamically ! Worldsheet SUSY changes dynamically ! All involve closed string tachyon condensation, treated exactly in α! and in the tachyon strength. THIS TALK IS A CONJECTURE-FREE ZONE! What I will describe today ! Aclassofα!-exact classical solutions of string theory ! With D not necessarily equal to 10 or 26 ! D changes dynamically ! Spacetime SUSY changes dynamically ! Worldsheet SUSY changes dynamically ! All involve closed string tachyon condensation, treated exactly in α! and in the tachyon strength. What I will describe today ! Aclassofα!-exact classical solutions of string theory ! With D not necessarily equal to 10 or 26 ! D changes dynamically ! Spacetime SUSY changes dynamically ! Worldsheet SUSY changes dynamically ! All involve closed string tachyon condensation, treated exactly in α! and in the tachyon strength. THIS TALK IS A CONJECTURE-FREE ZONE! Analogy with open string tachyon dynamics D-brane decay Analogy with open string tachyon dynamics D-brane decay Solitons Analogy with open string tachyon dynamics D-brane decay Analogy with open string tachyon dynamics D-brane decay Solitons Parallel with Open String Tachyon Dynamics An analogy arises for the (bosonic) closed string tachyon, representing an instability of spacetime itself. Outline Bosonic string solutions with nonzero tachyon Dimension-changing solutions in the bosonic string Transitions from type 0 to type II string theory Lightlike tachyon condensation in Type 0 Other examples Conclusions Parallel with Open String Tachyon Dynamics An analogy arises for the (bosonic) closed string tachyon, representing an instability of spacetime itself. Outline Bosonic string solutions with nonzero tachyon Dimension-changing solutions in the bosonic string Transitions from type 0 to type II string theory Lightlike tachyon condensation in Type 0 Other examples Conclusions Tachyonic perturbations We are interested in tachyonic perturbations of unstable string theories. In the bosonic string, for instance, the tachyon (X ) T couples to the worldsheet as a normal-ordered potential : (X ):. T Tachyonic perturbations We are interested in tachyonic perturbations of unstable string theories. In the bosonic string, for instance, the tachyon (X ) T couples to the worldsheet as a normal-ordered potential : (X ):. T We will now discuss a large class of solvable and exactly marginal perturbations of this form. Tachyonic perturbations We are interested in tachyonic perturbations of unstable string theories. In the bosonic string, for instance, the tachyon (X ) T couples to the worldsheet as a normal-ordered potential : (X ):. T Tachyonic perturbations We are interested in tachyonic perturbations of unstable string theories. In the bosonic string, for instance, the tachyon (X ) T couples to the worldsheet as a normal-ordered potential : (X ):. T We will now discuss a large class of solvable and exactly marginal perturbations of this form. Bubble of nothing Consider a theory
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gauge/Gravity Duality and Field Theories at Strong Coupling
    Th`ese de Doctorat Pr´esent´ee`al'Universit´eParis{Sud XI Sp´ecialit´e:Physique Th´eorique P´eriode acad´emique 2008{2011 Gauge/Gravity Duality and Field Theories at Strong Coupling Gregory C. Giecold Institut de Physique Th´eorique,CNRS{URA 2306 CEA/Saclay, F{91191 Gif{sur{Yvette, France Th`esesoutenue le 17 juin 2011 devant le jury compos´ede: Iosif Bena Directeur de Th`ese Emilian Dudas Membre du Jury Edmond Iancu Directeur de Th`ese Henning Samtleben Rapporteur Kostas Skenderis Rapporteur Acknowledgements I would like to thank my advisors Iosif Bena and Edmond Iancu for giving much leeway for exploring alleyways of my own interest in the maze of string theory and field theory. I am beholden for fast{paced, illuminating discussions with them and their careful guidance with non{scientific matters. I am grateful to Mariana Gra~naand Al Mueller for being sharp yet very kind collaborators. Special credit is due to Nick Halmagyi from whom I have learnt so much, Aussie vernacular included. Many thanks to Ruben Minasian and Robi Peschanski for their interest in my research orientations and for tips on relocating to Stony Brook. I am grateful to Emilian Dudas and Henning Samtleben for agreeing to be part of the jury of my PhD defense. Special thanks to Kostas Skenderis whose research has been very important to my work. Discussions with Michael Bon, Gaetan Borot, Roberto Bondesan, J´eromeDubail, Hadi Go- dazgar, Mahdi Godazgar, Andrea Puhm, Bruno Sciolla and Piotr Tourkine were appreciated. As for those conversations that have been of direct relevance to my field of research interests, I am grateful to Guillaume Beuf, Paul Chesler, Sheer El{Showk, Yoshitaka Hatta, Akikazu Hashimoto, Jan Manschot, Diego Marqu`es, Carlos Nu~nez,Hagen Triendl, Pierre Vanhove and Bert Vercnocke.
    [Show full text]
  • Magnetic Backgrounds and Tachyonic Instabilities in Closed String Theory
    Magnetic backgrounds and tachyonic instabilities in closed string theory Cite as: AIP Conference Proceedings 607, 269 (2002); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1454381 Published Online: 25 February 2002 A. A. Tseytlin AIP Conference Proceedings 607, 269 (2002); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1454381 607, 269 © 2002 American Institute of Physics. Magnetic Backgrounds and Tachyonic Instabilities in Closed String Theory A.A. Tseytlin Department of Physics, The Ohio State University, Columbus OH 43210-1106, USA Abstract. We consider closed superstrings in Melvin-type magnetic backgrounds. In the case of NS-NS backgrounds, these are exactly solvable as weakly coupled string models with spectrum containing tachyonic modes. Magnetic field allows one to interpolate between free superstring the- ories with periodic and antiperiodic boundary conditions for the fermions around some compact direction, and, in particular, between type 0 and type II string theories. Using "9-11" flip, this inter- polation can be extended to M-theory and may be used to study the issue of tachyon condensation in type 0 string theory. We review related duality proposals, and, in particular, suggest a description of type 0 theory in terms of M-theory in a curved magnetic flux background in which the type 0 tachyon appears to correspond to a state in d=l 1 supergravity fluctuation spectrum. INTRODUCTION Magnetic backgrounds play an important role in field theory and open string theory pro- viding simple solvable models with nontrivial physics content. Similar (approximately) constant magnetic backgrounds in gravitational theories like closed string theory are necessarily curved with an example provided by the Melvin-type flux tube solutions (see, e.g., [1]).
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to String Theory A.N
    Introduction to String Theory A.N. Schellekens Based on lectures given at the Radboud Universiteit, Nijmegen Last update 6 July 2016 [Word cloud by www.worldle.net] Contents 1 Current Problems in Particle Physics7 1.1 Problems of Quantum Gravity.........................9 1.2 String Diagrams................................. 11 2 Bosonic String Action 15 2.1 The Relativistic Point Particle......................... 15 2.2 The Nambu-Goto action............................ 16 2.3 The Free Boson Action............................. 16 2.4 World sheet versus Space-time......................... 18 2.5 Symmetries................................... 19 2.6 Conformal Gauge................................ 20 2.7 The Equations of Motion............................ 21 2.8 Conformal Invariance.............................. 22 3 String Spectra 24 3.1 Mode Expansion................................ 24 3.1.1 Closed Strings.............................. 24 3.1.2 Open String Boundary Conditions................... 25 3.1.3 Open String Mode Expansion..................... 26 3.1.4 Open versus Closed........................... 26 3.2 Quantization.................................. 26 3.3 Negative Norm States............................. 27 3.4 Constraints................................... 28 3.5 Mode Expansion of the Constraints...................... 28 3.6 The Virasoro Constraints............................ 29 3.7 Operator Ordering............................... 30 3.8 Commutators of Constraints.......................... 31 3.9 Computation of the Central Charge.....................
    [Show full text]
  • NS Fivebranes in Type 0 String Theory
    Preprint typeset in JHEP style. - HYPER VERSION KUL-TF-99/24 NS Fivebranes in Type 0 String Theory∗ Ben Craps† and Frederik Roose Instituut voor theoretische fysica Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium E-mail: Ben.Craps,[email protected] Abstract: The massless degrees of freedom of type 0 NS5-branes are derived. A non-chiral, purely bosonic spectrum is found in both type 0A and 0B. This non-chirality is confirmed by a one-loop computation in the bulk. Some puzzles concerning type 0B S-duality are pointed out in this context. An interpretation of the spectra in terms of “type 0 little strings” is proposed. Keywords: D-branes, String Duality. arXiv:hep-th/9906179v3 8 Oct 1999 ∗Work supported by the European Commission TMR programme ERBFMRX-CT96-0045. †Aspirant FWO, Belgium Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Type 0 strings and D-branes 2 3. NS fivebrane spectra 3 4. Absence of anomalies 4 5. S-duality 5 6. A little string interpretation 8 7. Conclusions 9 1. Introduction Type 0 string theories [1] have recently attracted a lot of attention. They have been used to study the non-supersymmetric field theories living on their D-branes [2]. Moreover, Bergman and Gaberdiel [3] have conjectured that they are supersymmetry breaking orbifolds of M-theory, thus including them in the web of string dualities. For instance, certain circle compactifications of type 0 and type II are proposed to be T-dual. Other predictions of the conjectured duality are that type 0B string theory exhibits S-duality and that the type 0 theories contain non-perturbative fermionic states.
    [Show full text]
  • NS Fivebranes in Type 0 String Theory∗
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CERN Document Server Preprint typeset in JHEP style. - HYPER VERSION KUL-TF-99/24 NS Fivebranes in Type 0 String Theory∗ Ben Craps† and Frederik Roose Instituut voor theoretische fysica Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium E-mail: Ben.Craps,[email protected] Abstract: The massless degrees of freedom of type 0 NS5-branes are derived. A non-chiral, purely bosonic spectrum is found in both type 0A and 0B. This non-chirality is confirmed by a one-loop computation in the bulk. Some puzzles concerning type 0B S-duality are pointed out in this context. An interpretation of the spectra in terms of “type 0 little strings” is proposed. Keywords: D-branes, String Duality. ∗Work supported by the European Commission TMR programme ERBFMRX-CT96-0045. yAspirant FWO, Belgium Contents 1. Introduction Type 0 string theories [1] have recently attracted a lot of attention. They have been used to study the non-supersymmetric field theories living on their D-branes [2]. Moreover, Bergman and Gaberdiel [3] have conjectured that they are supersymmetry breaking orbifolds of M-theory, thus including them in the web of string dualities. For instance, certain circle compactifications of type 0 and type II are proposed to be T-dual. Other predictions of the conjectured duality are that type 0B string theory exhibits S-duality and that the type 0 theories contain non-perturbative fermionic states. In Ref. [4] it has been studied how branes transform under type 0/type II T-duality.
    [Show full text]
  • Ads/CFT Correspondence and Type 0 String Theory∗
    Quantum aspects of gauge theories, supersymmetry and unification. PROCEEDINGS AdS/CFT Correspondence and Type 0 String Theory∗ Dario Martelli SISSA, Via Beirut 2-4 Trieste 34014 INFN Sezione di Trieste, Italy [email protected] Abstract: We review some applications of Type 0 string theory in the context of the AdS/CFT correspondence. Most of the success of the AdS/CFT corre- mf ∼ TH at tree level. This leads also spin 0 spondence is so far devoted to those situations bosons to acquire nonzero masses at one loop and where at least some fraction of supersymmetry spoils conformal symmetry because cancellations is preserved. The case of Type IIB supergravity in the β-function do not occur any more. At large 5 1 5× comp ∼ in AdS S is a typical example [1], where a de- distances (L R TH ) the infrared effec- tailed mapping between quantities living in the tive theory is then expected to be pure YM in two sides of the correspondence can be exploited. one lower dimension. However, an important issue to address is how to This approach captures some of the expected embed the physically relevant nonsupersymmet- qualitative features of the quantum field theory, ric gauge theories in the correspondence, eventu- as a confining behavior of the Wilson loop (ba- ally recovering asymptotic freedom and confine- sically due to the presence of a horizon in the ment. metric) and a mass-gap in the glue-ball spec- There are different proposals for giving a holo- trum. Moreover it provides a Lorentz invariant graphic description of nonsupersymmetric gauge regularization scheme, as opposed for instance theories, which basically deal with possible mech- to the lattice regularization.
    [Show full text]
  • Marcus Spradlin
    Marcus Spradlin Professor Brown University Department of Physics, and Box 1843 Brown Theoretical Physics Center 182 Hope Street Email: Marcus [email protected] Providence, RI 02912 USA Education 1996 AB in Physics, Princeton University, summa cum laude 1997 MASt in Applied Mathematics, University of Cambridge, with distinction 1999 MA in Physics, Harvard University 2001 PhD in Physics, Harvard University Advisor: Andrew Strominger Dissertation Topic: AdS2 Black Holes and Soliton Moduli Spaces Professional Appointments 2001–2003 Research Associate, Princeton University 2003–2005 Assistant Research Physicist, Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics 2005–2006 Member, School of Natural Sciences, Institute for Advanced Study 2006–2011 Manning Assistant Professor, Brown University 2011 Member, School of Natural Sciences, Institute for Advanced Study 2012–2013 Scientific Associate, Theory Group, CERN 2011–2017 Associate Professor, Brown University 2017–2018 Member, School of Natural Sciences, Institute for Advanced Study 2017– Professor, Brown University Academic Honors 1994 Barry M. Goldwater Scholarship 1995 Kusaka Memorial Prize, Princeton University Department of Physics 1995 Barry M. Goldwater Scholarship 1996 Kusaka Memorial Prize, Princeton University Department of Physics 1996 Elected to Sigma Xi 1996 Elected to Phi Beta Kappa 1996 NSF Graduate Research Fellowship in Theoretical Physics 2000 Maurice Goldhaber Prize, Harvard University Department of Physics 2006 Appointed Manning Assistant Professor, Brown University 2007 DOE Outstanding Junior Investigator Award 2008 Richard B. Salomon Faculty Research Award, Brown University 2017 Simons Fellowship in Theoretical Physics 2018 Elected Fellow of the American Physical Society 1 1 Jan 2021 Publications Over 6,400 citations, h-index 44 (according to Google Scholar) ♥ = 250+ citations (6) ♦ = 100+ citations (9) ♣ = 50+ citations (22) Books Edited 1.
    [Show full text]
  • IIA Moduli Stabilization with Badly Broken Supersymmetry
    IIA moduli stabilization with badly broken supersymmetry. August 15, 2018 Michael Dine, Alexander Morisse, Assaf Shomer and Zheng Sun ∗ Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, 95064 CA, USA Abstract Scherk-Schwarz compactification in string theory can be defined as orbifolding by an R symmetry, a symmetry that acts differently on bosons and fermions. Such a symmetry can arise in many situations, including toroidal and orbifold compactifications, as well as smooth Calabi-Yau spaces. If the symmetry acts freely then for large radius there are no tachyons in the spectrum. We focus mainly on stabilization by fluxes, and give examples with all moduli stabilized where the coupling is small and the internal manifold is large. Such models appear to be perturbatively stable with supersymmetry broken at the Kaluza-Klein scale. These are interesting laboratories for a variety of theoretical questions and provide models of a non-supersymmetric landscape. arXiv:hep-th/0612189v3 30 Dec 2006 ∗[email protected], [email protected], [email protected]; [email protected] 1 1 Introduction One of the simplest ways to think about supersymmetry breaking in higher dimensions is Scherk-Schwarz compactification [1]. Here one usually considers compactification on a torus, and imposes periodic boundary conditions for bosons and anti-periodic boundary conditions for fermions. As a result, in the four dimensional theory, supersymmetry is broken at the scale of compactification, 1/R; below this scale, there is no light gravitino, and the breaking appears explicit. These theories have other interesting features. Typically, at small radius, they have tachyons and are T-dual to compactifications of Type 0 theories [2].
    [Show full text]
  • Stability and Asymptotic Supersymmetry in Perturbative String Theory
    Stability & Asymptotic SUSY in Perturbative String Theory Vasilis Niarchos, CPHT Ecole Polytechnique based on work with Dan Israel hep-th/0703151, 0705.2140 Introduction A long standing problem is to understand the strong coupling dynamics of QCD Large N QCD is believed to have a stable weakly coupled string theory dual with an exponential density of bosonic excitations and no closed string fermions Unlike the more familiar supersymmetric cases, this is a situation where supersymmetry in the bulk is broken in the worst possible way !! There is a stringy tower of spacetime bosons but no fermions ! Typically such a drastic breaking of supersymmetry leads to instabilities (quadratic or linear )... 2 Introduction This raises the following natural question: Is it possible to find any examples in weakly coupled string theory with the aforementioned features, i.e. with a Hagedorn density of bosons, no fermions, no tree-level instabilities? Or is it that such examples are fundamentally absent because of some general principle ? Introduction The answer could be useful for: Determining the right framework for the QCD string Understanding the consequences and requirements for stability in perturbative string theory Obtaining constraints on the vacuum structure of string theory 4 Introduction We will see that string theories with the features of the QCD string do exist but are extremely rare !! Over the years there have been several indications that such theories might not even exist, and that the presence of fermions in the physical spectrum is intimately tied to perturbative stability 5 Introduction Some of these indications are: Follows from A theorem by Kutasov and Seiberg (1991) worldsheet duality and mild assumptions Perturbative stability in weakly coupled (oriented) string theory requires asymptotic supersymmetry i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Modern Applications Of
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Modern Applications of Scattering Amplitudes and Topological Phases A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Physics by Julio Parra Martinez 2020 © Copyright by Julio Parra Martinez 2020 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Modern Applications of Scattering Amplitudes and Topological Phases by Julio Parra Martinez Doctor of Philosophy in Physics University of California, Los Angeles, 2020 Professor Zvi Bern, Chair In this dissertation we discuss some novel applications of the methods of scattering ampli- tudes and topological phases. First, we describe on-shell tools to calculate anomalous dimen- sions in effective field theories with higer-dimension operators. Using such tools we prove and apply a new perturbative non-renormalization theorem, and we explore the structure of the two-loop anomalous dimension matrix of dimension-six operators in the Standard Model Ef- fective Theory (SMEFT). Second, we introduce new methods to calculate the classical limit of gravitational scattering amplitudes. Using these methods, in conjunction with eikonal techniques, we calculate the classical gravitational deflection angle of massive and massles particles in a variety of theories, which reveal graviton dominance beyond 't Hooft's. Finally, we point out that different choices of Gliozzi-Scherk-Olive (GSO) projections in superstring theory can be conveniently understood by the inclusion of fermionic invertible topological phases, or equivalently topological superconductors, on the worldsheet. We explain how the classification of fermionic topological phases, recently achieved by the condensed matter community, provides a complete and systematic classification of ten-dimensional superstrings and gives a new perspective on the K-theoretic classification of D-branes.
    [Show full text]
  • JHEP07(2007)065 Construc- ′ Hep072007065.Pdf June 8, 2007 July 16, 2007 July 25, 2007 H a Spatially , D-Branes
    Published by Institute of Physics Publishing for SISSA Received: June 8, 2007 Accepted: July 16, 2007 Published: July 25, 2007 Tree-level stability without spacetime fermions: novel examples in string theory Dan Isra¨el JHEP07(2007)065 GRECO, Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris, 98bis Bd Arago, 75014 Paris, France∗ E-mail: [email protected] Vasilis Niarchos Centre de Physique Th´eorique, Ecole´ Polytechnique, 91128 Palaiseau, France† E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Is perturbative stability intimately tied with the existence of spacetime fermions in string theory in more than two dimensions? Type 0′B string theory in ten- dimensional flat space is a rare example of a non-tachyonic, non-supersymmetric string theory with a purely bosonic closed string spectrum. However, all known type 0′ construc- tions exhibit massless NSNS tadpoles signaling the fact that we are not expanding around a true vacuum of the theory. In this note, we are searching for perturbatively stable ex- amples of type 0′ string theory without massless tadpoles in backgrounds with a spatially varying dilaton. We present two examples with this property in non-critical string theories that exhibit four- and six-dimensional Poincar´einvariance. We discuss the D-branes that can be embedded in this context and the type of gauge theories that can be constructed in this manner. We also comment on the embedding of these non-critical models in critical string theories and their holographic (Little String Theory) interpretation and propose a general conjecture for the role of asymptotic supersymmetry in perturbative string theory. Keywords: Superstring Vacua, Conformal Field Models in String Theory, D-branes.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae Anastasia Volovich
    Curriculum Vitae Anastasia Volovich 1. Name, Position, Academic Department Anastasia Volovich Professor of Physics Department of Physics Brown University 2. Address, Email, Date of birth Department of Physics Brown University Providence RI 02912 Phone: (401) 863 2622 Email: anastasia [email protected] Date of birth: July 22, 1976, Moscow, Russia 3. Education Physics & Mathematics MIPT (Fiztech) correspondence High School #2, Moscow, 1990-1993 (distinction in mathematics) Mathematical College, Independent University of Moscow, Russia, 1993-1999 B.A. & M.A., Physics: Moscow State University, Russia, 1993-1999 (highest honors, red diploma) Ph.D., Physics, Harvard University, 2002 Advisor: Andrew Strominger Dissertation Topic: Holography for Coset Spaces and Noncommutative Solitons 4. Professional Appointments Instructor in Mathematics, Physics & Mathematics High School #2, Moscow, 1995-1997 Visiting Scientist, LPTHE, University of Paris, Winter 1998, Summers 1998, 1999, 2001 1 January 2021 Assistant, Landau Institute for Theoretical Physics, Russia, 1996-1999 Research and Teaching Assistant, Harvard University, 1998-2002 Postgraduate Researcher, Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, Santa Barbara, 2002{2005 Member, Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, 2005{2006 Richard and Edna Salomon Assistant Professor of Physics, Brown, 2006{2011 Member, Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, Winter 2011 Program coordinator, Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, Santa Barbara, Spring 2011 Scientific Associate, CERN, 2012{2013 Associate Professor
    [Show full text]