DOCSLIB.ORG

Introduction to String Theory A.N

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Introduction to String Theory A.N Introduction to String Theory A.N. Schellekens Based on lectures given at the Radboud Universiteit, Nijmegen Last update 6 July 2016 [Word cloud by www.worldle.net] Contents 1 Current Problems in Particle Physics7 1.1 Problems of Quantum Gravity.........................9 1.2 String Diagrams................................. 11 2 Bosonic String Action 15 2.1 The Relativistic Point Particle......................... 15 2.2 The Nambu-Goto action............................ 16 2.3 The Free Boson Action............................. 16 2.4 World sheet versus Space-time......................... 18 2.5 Symmetries................................... 19 2.6 Conformal Gauge................................ 20 2.7 The Equations of Motion............................ 21 2.8 Conformal Invariance.............................. 22 3 String Spectra 24 3.1 Mode Expansion................................ 24 3.1.1 Closed Strings.............................. 24 3.1.2 Open String Boundary Conditions................... 25 3.1.3 Open String Mode Expansion..................... 26 3.1.4 Open versus Closed........................... 26 3.2 Quantization.................................. 26 3.3 Negative Norm States............................. 27 3.4 Constraints................................... 28 3.5 Mode Expansion of the Constraints...................... 28 3.6 The Virasoro Constraints............................ 29 3.7 Operator Ordering............................... 30 3.8 Commutators of Constraints.......................... 31 3.9 Computation of the Central Charge...................... 31 3.10 The Virasoro Algebra.............................. 32 3.11 Imposing the Virasoro Constraints...................... 33 3.12 The Mass Shell Condition........................... 34 3.12.1 Closed Strings.............................. 34 3.12.2 Open Strings.............................. 34 3.12.3 Tachyons?................................ 34 3.13 Unphysical State Decoupling.......................... 35 3.14 Light-Cone Gauge................................ 36 3.14.1 Constraints in Light-Cone Coordinates................ 37 3.14.2 Zero-Mode Constraints: Closed Strings................ 38 3.14.3 Zero-Mode Constraints: Open Strings................. 39 3.15 The Spectrum.................................. 39 3.15.1 Open Strings.............................. 39 2 3.15.2 The Little Group............................ 40 3.15.3 Tensor Representations of Orthogonal Groups............ 41 3.15.4 Open Strings (continued)........................ 42 3.15.5 Closed Strings.............................. 42 3.16 The Critical Dimension............................. 43 3.17 The Lorentz Algebra∗ .............................. 44 3.18 Unoriented Strings∗ ............................... 44 3.19 Chan-Paton labels∗ ............................... 45 3.20 Discussion.................................... 46 4 Compactification 49 4.1 Space-time Compactification for Particles................... 49 4.2 Space-time Compactification for Strings.................... 50 4.3 The Spectrum.................................. 50 4.4 T-duality.................................... 51 4.5 The Self-Dual Point∗ .............................. 52 4.6 Field Theory Interpretation∗ .......................... 53 4.7 Compactification of More Dimensions..................... 54 4.8 Narain Lattices................................. 56 4.9 Background Fields............................... 57 4.9.1 The Metric............................... 57 4.9.2 The Anti-Symmetric Tensor...................... 57 4.10 Moduli∗ ..................................... 59 4.11 Vacuum Selection∗ ............................... 60 4.12 Orbifolds∗ .................................... 62 5 Fermions on the world sheet 63 5.1 Generalizations of the Bosonic String..................... 63 5.2 The R^oleof the Conformal Anomaly∗ ..................... 64 5.3 Internal Free Fermions............................. 65 5.4 Quantization.................................. 66 5.5 The Energy-Momentum Tensor........................ 68 5.6 Noether Currents................................ 69 5.7 The Noether Current of Translation Invariance................ 69 5.8 The Mass Spectrum............................... 71 5.9 The Neveu-Schwarz Ground State....................... 72 5.10 The Ramond Ground State.......................... 72 5.11 Excited States.................................. 73 5.11.1 Neveu-Schwarz Sector......................... 73 5.11.2 Ramond Sector............................. 74 5.11.3 The Lorentz Algebra.......................... 74 5.12 Fermion-Boson Equivalence∗ .......................... 75 5.13 Fermionic Strings................................ 75 3 5.14 The Critical Dimension............................. 76 5.15 The Lorentz Algebra∗ .............................. 77 5.16 The Ramond Ground State.......................... 77 5.17 World Sheet Supersymmetry∗ ......................... 78 5.18 World Sheet Supergravity∗ ........................... 78 5.19 The Constraints∗ ................................ 79 6 One Loop Diagrams 80 6.1 Neveu-Schwarz or Ramond?.......................... 80 6.2 The Torus.................................... 80 6.3 The Polyakov Path Integral∗ .......................... 81 6.3.1 The Conformal Anomaly........................ 83 6.4 Sum over Topologies.............................. 83 6.4.1 Riemann Surfaces∗ ........................... 83 6.4.2 Topological Numbers.......................... 84 6.5 The R^oleof the Dilaton∗ ............................ 85 6.5.1 Bosonic String in a Dilaton Background............... 85 6.5.2 The String Coupling Constant..................... 85 6.6 Moduli...................................... 86 6.6.1 Moduli of Riemann Surfaces∗ ..................... 86 6.6.2 Moduli of the Torus.......................... 87 6.7 Complex Coordinates.............................. 88 6.8 Modular Transformations............................ 88 6.9 Integration over Moduli............................ 90 6.10 Computing the Path Integral......................... 91 6.11 The Bosonic String Partition Function.................... 92 6.11.1 Partition Functions and Physical State Counting........... 92 6.11.2 Assembling the Bosonic String Partition Function.......... 94 6.11.3 The Contribution of Momenta..................... 95 6.12 Modular Invariance of the Bosonic String................... 95 6.13 Strings versus Particles∗ ............................ 96 6.14 Partition Function for Compactified Strings................. 99 7 Superstrings 102 7.1 Free Fermion Partition Functions....................... 102 7.1.1 Neveu-Schwarz states.......................... 102 7.1.2 Ramond States............................. 103 7.2 Boundary Conditions.............................. 103 7.3 Modular Transformations............................ 106 7.4 The Modular Invariant Partition Function.................. 107 7.5 Multi-loop Modular Invariance∗ ........................ 108 7.6 Superstrings................................... 109 7.7 Supersymmetry and Supergravity∗ ...................... 110 4 7.8 Supersymmetry for the Massive States.................... 110 7.9 Ramond-Ramond Particles∗ .......................... 111 7.10 Other Modular Invariant String Theories................... 111 7.11 Internal Fermions................................ 112 7.11.1 Modular Invariant Partition Functions for Internal Free Fermions. 112 7.11.2 Factorized Partition Functions..................... 113 7.11.3 Symmetries of Free Fermions...................... 114 7.11.4 The 18- and 10-Dimensional Theories................. 114 7.11.5 Relation with Even Self-dual Lorentzian Lattices.......... 115 8 Heterotic Strings 116 8.1 The Massless Spectrum............................. 117 8.2 Comparison with other Closed String Theories................ 117 8.3 Supersymmetry∗ ................................ 117 8.4 Gauge symmetry∗ ................................ 118 8.5 Compactification∗ ................................ 118 8.5.1 Breaking the Lorentz Group∗ ..................... 119 8.5.2 Decomposition of Spinors∗ ....................... 119 8.5.3 Reduction of the Dirac Equation∗ ................... 121 8.6 Calabi-Yau Compactification∗ ......................... 122 8.7 The Standard Model in String Theory∗ .................... 123 8.8 Other Ten-dimensional Heterotic Strings................... 126 8.9 Four-dimensional Strings∗ ........................... 126 9 The String Theory Landscape and the Multiverse∗ 127 9.1 Moduli and Supersymmetry Breaking..................... 127 9.1.1 Space-time Supersymmetry...................... 128 9.1.2 Moduli Stabilization.......................... 128 9.2 A Proliferation of Vacua............................ 129 9.2.1 Vacuum Energy............................. 129 9.2.2 Anthropic Arguments.......................... 130 9.2.3 Eternal Inflation............................ 131 9.3 A Change of Perspective............................ 131 10 Dualities∗ 131 10.1 Open Strings.................................. 132 10.2 Finiteness.................................... 132 10.3 Dual Models................................... 134 10.4 Historical Remarks............................... 137 10.5 T-duality.................................... 138 10.6 Perturbative and Non-perturbative Physics.................. 138 10.7 D-branes..................................... 139 10.8 S-duality..................................... 141 5 Appendices 143 A Functional Methods 143 A.1 The Euclidean Action.............................. 146 B Path Integrals 146 C Self-dual Lattices 148 D Lie Algebra Dictionary 150
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kaluza-Klein Gravity, Concentrating on the General Rel- Ativity, Rather Than Particle Physics Side of the Subject
    Kaluza-Klein Gravity J. M. Overduin Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, P.O. Box 3055, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, V8W 3P6 and P. S. Wesson Department of Physics, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1 and Gravity Probe-B, Hansen Physics Laboratories, Stanford University, Stanford, California, U.S.A. 94305 Abstract We review higher-dimensional unified theories from the general relativity, rather than the particle physics side. Three distinct approaches to the subject are identi- fied and contrasted: compactified, projective and noncompactified. We discuss the cosmological and astrophysical implications of extra dimensions, and conclude that none of the three approaches can be ruled out on observational grounds at the present time. arXiv:gr-qc/9805018v1 7 May 1998 Preprint submitted to Elsevier Preprint 3 February 2008 1 Introduction Kaluza’s [1] achievement was to show that five-dimensional general relativity contains both Einstein’s four-dimensional theory of gravity and Maxwell’s the- ory of electromagnetism. He however imposed a somewhat artificial restriction (the cylinder condition) on the coordinates, essentially barring the fifth one a priori from making a direct appearance in the laws of physics. Klein’s [2] con- tribution was to make this restriction less artificial by suggesting a plausible physical basis for it in compactification of the fifth dimension. This idea was enthusiastically received by unified-field theorists, and when the time came to include the strong and weak forces by extending Kaluza’s mechanism to higher dimensions, it was assumed that these too would be compact. This line of thinking has led through eleven-dimensional supergravity theories in the 1980s to the current favorite contenders for a possible “theory of everything,” ten-dimensional superstrings.
    [Show full text]
  • Conformal Symmetry in Field Theory and in Quantum Gravity
    universe Review Conformal Symmetry in Field Theory and in Quantum Gravity Lesław Rachwał Instituto de Física, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília DF 70910-900, Brazil; [email protected] Received: 29 August 2018; Accepted: 9 November 2018; Published: 15 November 2018 Abstract: Conformal symmetry always played an important role in field theory (both quantum and classical) and in gravity. We present construction of quantum conformal gravity and discuss its features regarding scattering amplitudes and quantum effective action. First, the long and complicated story of UV-divergences is recalled. With the development of UV-finite higher derivative (or non-local) gravitational theory, all problems with infinities and spacetime singularities might be completely solved. Moreover, the non-local quantum conformal theory reveals itself to be ghost-free, so the unitarity of the theory should be safe. After the construction of UV-finite theory, we focused on making it manifestly conformally invariant using the dilaton trick. We also argue that in this class of theories conformal anomaly can be taken to vanish by fine-tuning the couplings. As applications of this theory, the constraints of the conformal symmetry on the form of the effective action and on the scattering amplitudes are shown. We also remark about the preservation of the unitarity bound for scattering. Finally, the old model of conformal supergravity by Fradkin and Tseytlin is briefly presented. Keywords: quantum gravity; conformal gravity; quantum field theory; non-local gravity; super- renormalizable gravity; UV-finite gravity; conformal anomaly; scattering amplitudes; conformal symmetry; conformal supergravity 1. Introduction From the beginning of research on theories enjoying invariance under local spacetime-dependent transformations, conformal symmetry played a pivotal role—first introduced by Weyl related changes of meters to measure distances (and also due to relativity changes of periods of clocks to measure time intervals).
    [Show full text]
  • A String Landscape Perspective on Naturalness Outline • Preliminaries
    A String Landscape Perspective on Naturalness A. Hebecker (Heidelberg) Outline • Preliminaries (I): The problem(s) and the multiverse `solution' • Preliminaries (II): From field theory to quantum gravity (String theory in 10 dimensions) • Compactifications to 4 dimensions • The (flux-) landscape • Eternal inflation, multiverse, measure problem The two hierarchy/naturalness problems • A much simplified basic lagrangian is 2 2 2 2 4 L ∼ MP R − Λ − jDHj + mhjHj − λjHj : • Assuming some simple theory with O(1) fundamental parameters at the scale E ∼ MP , we generically expectΛ and mH of that order. • For simplicity and because it is experimentally better established, I will focus in on theΛ-problem. (But almost all that follows applies to both problems!) The multiverse `solution' • It is quite possible that in the true quantum gravity theory, Λ comes out tiny as a result of an accidental cancellation. • But, we perceive that us unlikely. • By contrast, if we knew there were 10120 valid quantum gravity theories, we would be quite happy assuming that one of them has smallΛ. (As long as the calculations giving Λ are sufficiently involved to argue for Gaussian statisics of the results.) • Even better (since in principle testable): We could have one theory with 10120 solutions with differentΛ. Λ-values ! The multiverse `solution' (continued) • This `generic multiverse logic' has been advertised long before any supporting evidence from string theory existed. This goes back at least to the 80's and involves many famous names: Barrow/Tipler , Tegmark , Hawking , Hartle , Coleman , Weinberg .... • Envoking the `Anthropic Principle', [the selection of universes by demanding features which we think are necessary for intelligent life and hence for observers] it is then even possible to predict certain observables.
    [Show full text]
  • Duality and Strings Dieter Lüst, LMU and MPI München
    Duality and Strings Dieter Lüst, LMU and MPI München Freitag, 15. März 13 Luis made several very profound and important contributions to theoretical physics ! Freitag, 15. März 13 Luis made several very profound and important contributions to theoretical physics ! Often we were working on related subjects and I enjoyed various very nice collaborations and friendship with Luis. Freitag, 15. März 13 Luis made several very profound and important contributions to theoretical physics ! Often we were working on related subjects and I enjoyed various very nice collaborations and friendship with Luis. Duality of 4 - dimensional string constructions: • Covariant lattices ⇔ (a)symmetric orbifolds (1986/87: W. Lerche, D.L., A. Schellekens ⇔ L. Ibanez, H.P. Nilles, F. Quevedo) • Intersecting D-brane models ☞ SM (?) (2000/01: R. Blumenhagen, B. Körs, L. Görlich, D.L., T. Ott ⇔ G. Aldazabal, S. Franco, L. Ibanez, F. Marchesano, R. Rabadan, A. Uranga) Freitag, 15. März 13 Luis made several very profound and important contributions to theoretical physics ! Often we were working on related subjects and I enjoyed various very nice collaborations and friendship with Luis. Duality of 4 - dimensional string constructions: • Covariant lattices ⇔ (a)symmetric orbifolds (1986/87: W. Lerche, D.L., A. Schellekens ⇔ L. Ibanez, H.P. Nilles, F. Quevedo) • Intersecting D-brane models ☞ SM (?) (2000/01: R. Blumenhagen, B. Körs, L. Görlich, D.L., T. Ott ⇔ G. Aldazabal, S. Franco, L. Ibanez, F. Marchesano, R. Rabadan, A. Uranga) ➢ Madrid (Spanish) Quiver ! Freitag, 15. März 13 Luis made several very profound and important contributions to theoretical physics ! Often we were working on related subjects and I enjoyed various very nice collaborations and friendship with Luis.
    [Show full text]
  • Gauge/Gravity Duality and Field Theories at Strong Coupling
    Th`ese de Doctorat Pr´esent´ee`al'Universit´eParis{Sud XI Sp´ecialit´e:Physique Th´eorique P´eriode acad´emique 2008{2011 Gauge/Gravity Duality and Field Theories at Strong Coupling Gregory C. Giecold Institut de Physique Th´eorique,CNRS{URA 2306 CEA/Saclay, F{91191 Gif{sur{Yvette, France Th`esesoutenue le 17 juin 2011 devant le jury compos´ede: Iosif Bena Directeur de Th`ese Emilian Dudas Membre du Jury Edmond Iancu Directeur de Th`ese Henning Samtleben Rapporteur Kostas Skenderis Rapporteur Acknowledgements I would like to thank my advisors Iosif Bena and Edmond Iancu for giving much leeway for exploring alleyways of my own interest in the maze of string theory and field theory. I am beholden for fast{paced, illuminating discussions with them and their careful guidance with non{scientific matters. I am grateful to Mariana Gra~naand Al Mueller for being sharp yet very kind collaborators. Special credit is due to Nick Halmagyi from whom I have learnt so much, Aussie vernacular included. Many thanks to Ruben Minasian and Robi Peschanski for their interest in my research orientations and for tips on relocating to Stony Brook. I am grateful to Emilian Dudas and Henning Samtleben for agreeing to be part of the jury of my PhD defense. Special thanks to Kostas Skenderis whose research has been very important to my work. Discussions with Michael Bon, Gaetan Borot, Roberto Bondesan, J´eromeDubail, Hadi Go- dazgar, Mahdi Godazgar, Andrea Puhm, Bruno Sciolla and Piotr Tourkine were appreciated. As for those conversations that have been of direct relevance to my field of research interests, I am grateful to Guillaume Beuf, Paul Chesler, Sheer El{Showk, Yoshitaka Hatta, Akikazu Hashimoto, Jan Manschot, Diego Marqu`es, Carlos Nu~nez,Hagen Triendl, Pierre Vanhove and Bert Vercnocke.
    [Show full text]
  • The Top Yukawa Coupling from 10D Supergravity with E8 × E8 Matter
    hep-th/9804107 ITEP-98-11 The top Yukawa coupling from 10D supergravity with E E matter 8 × 8 K.Zyablyuk1 Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow Abstract We consider the compactification of N=1, D=10 supergravity with E E Yang- 8 × 8 Mills matter to N=1, D=4 model with 3 generations. With help of embedding SU(5) → SO(10) E E we find the value of the top Yukawa coupling λ = 16πα =3 → 6 → 8 t GUT at the GUT scale. p 1 Introduction Although superstring theories have great success and today are the best candidates for a quantum theory unifying all interactions, they still do not predict any experimentally testable value, mostly because there is no unambiguous procedure of compactification of extra spatial dimensions. On the other hand, many phenomenological models based on the unification group SO(10) were constructed (for instance [1]). They describe quarks and leptons in representa- tions 161,162,163 and Higgses, responsible for SU(2) breaking, in 10. Basic assumption of these models is that there is only one Yukawa coupling 163 10 163 at the GUT scale, which gives masses of third generation. Masses of first two families· and· mixings are generated due to the interaction with additional superheavy ( MGUT ) states in 16 + 16, 45, 54. Such models explain generation mass hierarchy and allow∼ to express all Yukawa matrices, which well fit into experimentally observable pattern, in terms of few unknown parameters. Models of [1] are unlikely derivable from ”more fundamental” theory like supergrav- ity/string. Nevertheless, something similar can be constructed from D=10 supergravity coupled to E8 E8 matter, which is low-energy limit of heterotic string [2].
    [Show full text]
  • Twenty Years of the Weyl Anomaly
    CTP-TAMU-06/93 Twenty Years of the Weyl Anomaly † M. J. Duff ‡ Center for Theoretical Physics Physics Department Texas A & M University College Station, Texas 77843 ABSTRACT In 1973 two Salam prot´eg´es (Derek Capper and the author) discovered that the conformal invariance under Weyl rescalings of the metric tensor 2 gµν(x) Ω (x)gµν (x) displayed by classical massless field systems in interac- tion with→ gravity no longer survives in the quantum theory. Since then these Weyl anomalies have found a variety of applications in black hole physics, cosmology, string theory and statistical mechanics. We give a nostalgic re- view. arXiv:hep-th/9308075v1 16 Aug 1993 CTP/TAMU-06/93 July 1993 †Talk given at the Salamfest, ICTP, Trieste, March 1993. ‡ Research supported in part by NSF Grant PHY-9106593. When all else fails, you can always tell the truth. Abdus Salam 1 Trieste and Oxford Twenty years ago, Derek Capper and I had embarked on our very first post- docs here in Trieste. We were two Salam students fresh from Imperial College filled with ideas about quantizing the gravitational field: a subject which at the time was pursued only by mad dogs and Englishmen. (My thesis title: Problems in the Classical and Quantum Theories of Gravitation was greeted with hoots of derision when I announced it at the Cargese Summer School en route to Trieste. The work originated with a bet between Abdus Salam and Hermann Bondi about whether you could generate the Schwarzschild solution using Feynman diagrams. You can (and I did) but I never found out if Bondi ever paid up.) Inspired by Salam, Capper and I decided to use the recently discovered dimensional regularization1 to calculate corrections to the graviton propaga- tor from closed loops of massless particles: vectors [1] and spinors [2], the former in collaboration with Leopold Halpern.
    [Show full text]
  • From Vibrating Strings to a Unified Theory of All Interactions
    Barton Zwiebach From Vibrating Strings to a Unified Theory of All Interactions or the last twenty years, physicists have investigated F String Theory rather vigorously. The theory has revealed an unusual depth. As a result, despite much progress in our under- standing of its remarkable properties, basic features of the theory remain a mystery. This extended period of activity is, in fact, the second period of activity in string theory. When it was first discov- ered in the late 1960s, string theory attempted to describe strongly interacting particles. Along came Quantum Chromodynamics— a theoryof quarks and gluons—and despite their early promise, strings faded away. This time string theory is a credible candidate for a theoryof all interactions—a unified theoryof all forces and matter. The greatest complication that frustrated the search for such a unified theorywas the incompatibility between two pillars of twen- tieth century physics: Einstein’s General Theoryof Relativity and the principles of Quantum Mechanics. String theory appears to be 30 ) zwiebach mit physics annual 2004 the long-sought quantum mechani- cal theory of gravity and other interactions. It is almost certain that string theory is a consistent theory. It is less certain that it describes our real world. Nevertheless, intense work has demonstrated that string theory incorporates many features of the physical universe. It is reasonable to be very optimistic about the prospects of string theory. Perhaps one of the most impressive features of string theory is the appearance of gravity as one of the fluctuation modes of a closed string. Although it was not discov- ered exactly in this way, we can describe a logical path that leads to the discovery of gravity in string theory.
    [Show full text]
  • 8.821 String Theory Fall 2008
    MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 8.821 String Theory Fall 2008 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. 8.821 F2008 Lecture 11: CFT continued; geometry of AdS Lecturer: McGreevy October 17, 2008 In this session, we are going to talk about the following topics. 1. We are making a few comments about CFT. 2. We are discussing spheres and hyperboloids. 3. Finally we are focusing on Lorentzian AdS and its boundary. 1 Conformal Symmetry 1.1 Weyl anomaly Quantumly, conformal symmetry in a curved space (with even number of dimensions) could be anomalous, that is ds2 → Ω(x)ds2 could be no longer a symmetry of the full quantum theory. This µ anomaly can be evaluated from the following diagram with operator Tµ inserted at the left vertex. Figure 1: A contribution to the Weyl anomaly. The conformal anomaly signals a nonzero value for the trace of the energy-momentum tensor. In a curved spacetime, it is related to the curvature: µ D/2 Tµ ∼ R 1 where R denotes some scalar contractions of curvature tensors and D is the number of spacetime dimensions; the power is determined by dimensional analysis. For the special case of D = 2, this is c T µ = − R(2) (1) µ 12 where R(2) is the Ricci scalar in two dimensions and c is the central charge of the Virasoro algebra µ of the 2d CFT. Also in D = 4, the anomaly is given by Tµ = aW + cGB where W and B are defined as 1 W = (Weyl tensor)2 = R....R − 2R..R + R2 (2) ...
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Conformal Field Theory and String
    SLAC-PUB-5149 December 1989 m INTRODUCTION TO CONFORMAL FIELD THEORY AND STRING THEORY* Lance J. Dixon Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Stanford University Stanford, CA 94309 ABSTRACT I give an elementary introduction to conformal field theory and its applications to string theory. I. INTRODUCTION: These lectures are meant to provide a brief introduction to conformal field -theory (CFT) and string theory for those with no prior exposure to the subjects. There are many excellent reviews already available (or almost available), and most of these go in to much more detail than I will be able to here. Those reviews con- centrating on the CFT side of the subject include refs. 1,2,3,4; those emphasizing string theory include refs. 5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13 I will start with a little pre-history of string theory to help motivate the sub- ject. In the 1960’s it was noticed that certain properties of the hadronic spectrum - squared masses for resonances that rose linearly with the angular momentum - resembled the excitations of a massless, relativistic string.14 Such a string is char- *Work supported in by the Department of Energy, contract DE-AC03-76SF00515. Lectures presented at the Theoretical Advanced Study Institute In Elementary Particle Physics, Boulder, Colorado, June 4-30,1989 acterized by just one energy (or length) scale,* namely the square root of the string tension T, which is the energy per unit length of a static, stretched string. For strings to describe the strong interactions fi should be of order 1 GeV. Although strings provided a qualitative understanding of much hadronic physics (and are still useful today for describing hadronic spectra 15 and fragmentation16), some features were hard to reconcile.
    [Show full text]
  • String Theory for Pedestrians
    String Theory for Pedestrians – CERN, Jan 29-31, 2007 – B. Zwiebach, MIT This series of 3 lecture series will cover the following topics 1. Introduction. The classical theory of strings. Application: physics of cosmic strings. 2. Quantum string theory. Applications: i) Systematics of hadronic spectra ii) Quark-antiquark potential (lattice simulations) iii) AdS/CFT: the quark-gluon plasma. 3. String models of particle physics. The string theory landscape. Alternatives: Loop quantum gravity? Formulations of string theory. 1 Introduction For the last twenty years physicists have investigated String Theory rather vigorously. Despite much progress, the basic features of the theory remain a mystery. In the late 1960s, string theory attempted to describe strongly interacting particles. Along came Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD)– a theory of quarks and gluons – and despite their early promise, strings faded away. This time string theory is a credible candidate for a theory of all interactions – a unified theory of all forces and matter. Additionally, • Through the AdS/CFT correspondence, it is a valuable tool for the study of theories like QCD. • It has helped understand the origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy of black holes. • Finally, it has inspired many of the scenarios for physics Beyond the Standard Model of Particle physics. 2 Greatest problem of twentieth century physics: the incompatibility of Einstein’s General Relativity and the principles of Quantum Mechanics. String theory appears to be the long-sought quantum mechanical theory of gravity and other interactions. It is almost certain that string theory is a consistent theory. It is less certain that it describes our real world.
    [Show full text]
  • Magnetic Backgrounds and Tachyonic Instabilities in Closed String Theory
    Magnetic backgrounds and tachyonic instabilities in closed string theory Cite as: AIP Conference Proceedings 607, 269 (2002); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1454381 Published Online: 25 February 2002 A. A. Tseytlin AIP Conference Proceedings 607, 269 (2002); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1454381 607, 269 © 2002 American Institute of Physics. Magnetic Backgrounds and Tachyonic Instabilities in Closed String Theory A.A. Tseytlin Department of Physics, The Ohio State University, Columbus OH 43210-1106, USA Abstract. We consider closed superstrings in Melvin-type magnetic backgrounds. In the case of NS-NS backgrounds, these are exactly solvable as weakly coupled string models with spectrum containing tachyonic modes. Magnetic field allows one to interpolate between free superstring the- ories with periodic and antiperiodic boundary conditions for the fermions around some compact direction, and, in particular, between type 0 and type II string theories. Using "9-11" flip, this inter- polation can be extended to M-theory and may be used to study the issue of tachyon condensation in type 0 string theory. We review related duality proposals, and, in particular, suggest a description of type 0 theory in terms of M-theory in a curved magnetic flux background in which the type 0 tachyon appears to correspond to a state in d=l 1 supergravity fluctuation spectrum. INTRODUCTION Magnetic backgrounds play an important role in field theory and open string theory pro- viding simple solvable models with nontrivial physics content. Similar (approximately) constant magnetic backgrounds in gravitational theories like closed string theory are necessarily curved with an example provided by the Melvin-type flux tube solutions (see, e.g., [1]).
    [Show full text]