DOCSLIB.ORG

Ads/CFT Correspondence and Type 0 String Theory∗

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Quantum aspects of gauge theories, supersymmetry and unification. PROCEEDINGS AdS/CFT Correspondence and Type 0 String Theory∗ Dario Martelli SISSA, Via Beirut 2-4 Trieste 34014 INFN Sezione di Trieste, Italy [email protected] Abstract: We review some applications of Type 0 string theory in the context of the AdS/CFT correspondence. Most of the success of the AdS/CFT corre- mf ∼ TH at tree level. This leads also spin 0 spondence is so far devoted to those situations bosons to acquire nonzero masses at one loop and where at least some fraction of supersymmetry spoils conformal symmetry because cancellations is preserved. The case of Type IIB supergravity in the β-function do not occur any more. At large 5 1 5× comp ∼ in AdS S is a typical example [1], where a de- distances (L R TH ) the infrared effec- tailed mapping between quantities living in the tive theory is then expected to be pure YM in two sides of the correspondence can be exploited. one lower dimension. However, an important issue to address is how to This approach captures some of the expected embed the physically relevant nonsupersymmet- qualitative features of the quantum field theory, ric gauge theories in the correspondence, eventu- as a confining behavior of the Wilson loop (ba- ally recovering asymptotic freedom and confine- sically due to the presence of a horizon in the ment. metric) and a mass-gap in the glue-ball spec- There are different proposals for giving a holo- trum. Moreover it provides a Lorentz invariant graphic description of nonsupersymmetric gauge regularization scheme, as opposed for instance theories, which basically deal with possible mech- to the lattice regularization. Nonetheless it has anisms for breaking supersymmetry. After re- some drawbacks: There is still coupling with the calling some of them, we will discuss some conse- physics in higher dimension, as both the masses quences of the approach proposed by Polyakov in of glue-balls and of fermions are of the same or- [2]1 that consists in considering a nonsupersym- der of the Hawking temperature. In addition, the metric string theory with non-chiral GSO projec- p-dimensional ’t Hooft coupling obeys tion, known as Type 0 [4, 5]. ∼ Before going to the main subject, we will λp λp+1TH briefly recall some of the alternative approaches where TH acts as UV cutoff. As the cutoff is presented in the literature. removed (TH →∞), λp+1 should approach zero, It was pointed out by Witten [6, 7] that the but this is opposite to the regime in which the AdS/CFT correspondence can be formulated at supergravity approximation applies2. finite temperature. In doing so one identifies the Among various means to break supersymme- Hawking temperature TH of the supergravity so- try there are the deformations of supersymmetric lution with that of the field theory in a ther- solutions. One searches for (domain wall) solu- mal bath. The antiperiodic boundary conditions tions interpolating between some AdS vacuum for fermions along the compactified (time) direc- with N supersymmetries and a different vacuum tion break supersymmetry and give them masses 2In this respect the situation is similar to the lattice ∗Preprint SISSA 17/2000/EP approach, where computations are possible at strong cou- 1See [3] for recent developments. pling. Quantum aspects of gauge theories, supersymmetry and unification. Dario Martelli that can be AdS or not, and has N 0 < N .3 In all tree level correlators of vertex operators of the field theory side this is interpreted as turning (NS+,NS+) and (R+,R+) fields are the same as on some relevant operators that drive the initial Type II. Using these and other properties it is theory to an effective IR theory via RG flow of possible to derive an expression for the effective the couplings. Later we will mention an applica- gravity action [9] that, split in the NSNS and RR tion of this construction in the context of Type contributions, reads: 0 theory. Z 10 √ −2Φ Another way to break supersymmetry is that SNSNS = d x −ge R of considering orbifolds theories, or branes at sin- 1 2 2 1 2 gularities. These two methods have been pursued − |dB| +4|dΦ| − |dT | − V (T ) (1.1) 12 2 extensively in the literature and here we will not Z comment them further on. 10 √ 2 SRR = d x −g f(T )|Fp+2| + ··· (1.2) 1. Type 0 Strings and Gravity The main novelties are coming from the tachyon In this section we summarize some basic features couplings. In particular, there is a potential V (T ) of Type 0 string theories [4, 5] and their gravity which is an even function of the tachyon field, effective actions [9]. as well as functions f(T ) multiplying RR terms, Type 0 string theories are purely bosonic strings that can be worked out perturbatively. with modular invariant partition function and four sectors whose low laying fields are here sum- 2. A couple of examples marized4 (NS+,NS+) (NS−,NS−) Here we recall the basic ideas behind applica- 0A/0B Φ,Bµν ,gµν T tions of the Type 0 construction, with the help of two of the earlier examples provided by Kle- (R+,R∓)(R−,R) banov and Tseytlin in the papers [10, 11]. As (1) (1) (2) (2) in the usual Type II case, the idea is to consider 0A Aµ Aµνρ Aµ Aµνρ (1) (1) (+) (2) (2) (−) a setup of D-branes of the theory, work out the 0B A Aµν Aµνρσ A Aµν Aµνρσ gauge theory living on their world-volume, and There is a corresponding doubled set of D-branes eventually find the corresponding solution of the coupling to RR-fields. gravity theory in order to make comparisons and, As pointed out in [2] there are no open string hopefully, predictions. tachyons on the world-volume of these branes, while there is a perturbative closed string tachyon 2.1 YM theory in 4 dimensions that renders the Minkowski vacuum unstable. Nev- Consider the stack of N D3 branes of the same ertheless one should regard this as an indication type in Type 0B string theory. The configuration that ten dimensional flat background is not sta- is stable and the low energy spectrum on their ble, while there should exist other vacua in which world-volume consists of SU(N) gauge bosons the theory makes sense. AdS space seems in this plus 6 adjoint scalars in 3 + 1 dimensions. respect a good candidate in that it allows for In [10] the authors find two approximate so- tachyonic modes. lutions of the gravity equations of motions that N =(1,1) supersymmetry on the world- involve nontrivial tachyon, dilaton, together with sheet makes these theories similar in some re- RR 4-form, and whose asymptotics are given in spect to supersymmetric Type II. For example the UV and IR regions5. 3 5 See for instance the talks related to [8] in this confer- The metric approaches in both cases AdS5×S ence. (with different radii) and the behavior of the other 4The two entries in parenthesis refer respectively to left and right movers and the signs correspond to the choice 5The identifications of these regimes follows from the of GSO projection. The upper (lower) signs in the RR usual identification of the radial coordinate transversal to sectors define Type 0A (0B) theory. the stack, with energy scale of the gauge theory. 2 Quantum aspects of gauge theories, supersymmetry and unification. Dario Martelli fields is as follows. The first one displays a van- theory (or gravity) side. In fact the stability of ishing ’t Hooft coupling and a tachyon conden- the CFT at weak coupling implies that Type 0B 5 sate with <T >∼−1, while the second repre- theory on AdS5×S should be stable for suffi- sents an IR conformal point at infinite coupling ciently small radius. In [13] it is suggested that — in fact the dilaton blows up while the tachyon the instability of the background at large radius condensate is <T >∼0. translates in a phase transition occurring in the Interestingly, the asymptotic freedom is re- large N CFT at strong coupling, with anomalous produced. It should be noted however that in dimension of the operator dual to the tachyon this situation α0 corrections become important, field developing a singularity at a critical value while in the IR one has to worry about string λc. loop corrections. Moreover, connecting the two asymptotic solutions is still an open question. 3. Non-critical Type 0 2.2 Nonsupersymmetric CFT In this section we expose some results obtained Another interesting problem that has been stud- in [14, 15] concerning the extension of Type 0 ied is the construction of gauge theories that are string theory in non-critical dimensions, together conformal though nonsupersymmetric and their with a proposal for the effective action and the dual gravitational description. Let us illustrate discussion of some solutions. the construction in [11]. In Type 0B theory one The original proposal in [2] was to consider starts with a stack of N D3 branes of one type a string theory in dimension d<10. Even if (say, electric) and N of the other (say, magnetic). a microscopic description of string theory out of This configuration is argued to be stable in the criticality is still far, there are at least indications large N limit6. The theory living on the world- for a possible extension of Type 0 theories in non- volume of this stack is a SU(N)×SU(N) gauge critical dimensions: theory in 3 + 1 dimensions, whose field content comprises, in addition to gauge bosons, 6 ad- • a diagonal partition function, whose mod- joint scalars for each SU(N) factor, 4 bifunda- ular invariance doesn’t rely on d =10(as ¯ mental fermions in the (N, N)andtheirconju- opposed to Type II theories) gates.
Recommended publications
  • Kaluza-Klein Gravity, Concentrating on the General Rel- Ativity, Rather Than Particle Physics Side of the Subject

    Kaluza-Klein Gravity, Concentrating on the General Rel- Ativity, Rather Than Particle Physics Side of the Subject

    Kaluza-Klein Gravity J. M. Overduin Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, P.O. Box 3055, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, V8W 3P6 and P. S. Wesson Department of Physics, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1 and Gravity Probe-B, Hansen Physics Laboratories, Stanford University, Stanford, California, U.S.A. 94305 Abstract We review higher-dimensional unified theories from the general relativity, rather than the particle physics side. Three distinct approaches to the subject are identi- fied and contrasted: compactified, projective and noncompactified. We discuss the cosmological and astrophysical implications of extra dimensions, and conclude that none of the three approaches can be ruled out on observational grounds at the present time. arXiv:gr-qc/9805018v1 7 May 1998 Preprint submitted to Elsevier Preprint 3 February 2008 1 Introduction Kaluza’s [1] achievement was to show that five-dimensional general relativity contains both Einstein’s four-dimensional theory of gravity and Maxwell’s the- ory of electromagnetism. He however imposed a somewhat artificial restriction (the cylinder condition) on the coordinates, essentially barring the fifth one a priori from making a direct appearance in the laws of physics. Klein’s [2] con- tribution was to make this restriction less artificial by suggesting a plausible physical basis for it in compactification of the fifth dimension. This idea was enthusiastically received by unified-field theorists, and when the time came to include the strong and weak forces by extending Kaluza’s mechanism to higher dimensions, it was assumed that these too would be compact. This line of thinking has led through eleven-dimensional supergravity theories in the 1980s to the current favorite contenders for a possible “theory of everything,” ten-dimensional superstrings.
  • UV Behavior of Half-Maximal Supergravity Theories

    UV Behavior of Half-Maximal Supergravity Theories

    UV behavior of half-maximal supergravity theories. Piotr Tourkine, Quantum Gravity in Paris 2013, LPT Orsay In collaboration with Pierre Vanhove, based on 1202.3692, 1208.1255 Understand the pertubative structure of supergravity theories. ● Supergravities are theories of gravity with local supersymmetry. ● Those theories naturally arise in the low energy limit of superstring theory. ● String theory is then a UV completion for those and thus provides a good framework to study their UV behavior. → Maximal and half-maximal supergravities. Maximal supergravity ● Maximally extended supergravity: – Low energy limit of type IIA/B theory, – 32 real supercharges, unique (ungauged) – N=8 in d=4 ● Long standing problem to determine if maximal supergravity can be a consistent theory of quantum gravity in d=4. ● Current consensus on the subject : it is not UV finite, the first divergence could occur at the 7-loop order. ● Impressive progresses made during last 5 years in the field of scattering amplitudes computations. [Bern, Carrasco, Dixon, Dunbar, Johansson, Kosower, Perelstein, Rozowsky etc.] Half-maximal supergravity ● Half-maximal supergravity: – Heterotic string, but also type II strings on orbifolds – 16 real supercharges, – N=4 in d=4 ● Richer structure, and still a lot of SUSY so explicit computations are still possible. ● There are UV divergences in d=4, [Fischler 1979] at one loop for external matter states ● UV divergence in gravity amplitudes ? As we will see the divergence is expected to arise at the four loop order. String models that give half-maximal supergravity “(4,0)” susy “(0,4)” susy ● Type IIA/B string = Superstring ⊗ Superstring Torus compactification : preserves full (4,4) supersymmetry.
  • Gauge/Gravity Duality and Field Theories at Strong Coupling

    Gauge/Gravity Duality and Field Theories at Strong Coupling

    Th`ese de Doctorat Pr´esent´ee`al'Universit´eParis{Sud XI Sp´ecialit´e:Physique Th´eorique P´eriode acad´emique 2008{2011 Gauge/Gravity Duality and Field Theories at Strong Coupling Gregory C. Giecold Institut de Physique Th´eorique,CNRS{URA 2306 CEA/Saclay, F{91191 Gif{sur{Yvette, France Th`esesoutenue le 17 juin 2011 devant le jury compos´ede: Iosif Bena Directeur de Th`ese Emilian Dudas Membre du Jury Edmond Iancu Directeur de Th`ese Henning Samtleben Rapporteur Kostas Skenderis Rapporteur Acknowledgements I would like to thank my advisors Iosif Bena and Edmond Iancu for giving much leeway for exploring alleyways of my own interest in the maze of string theory and field theory. I am beholden for fast{paced, illuminating discussions with them and their careful guidance with non{scientific matters. I am grateful to Mariana Gra~naand Al Mueller for being sharp yet very kind collaborators. Special credit is due to Nick Halmagyi from whom I have learnt so much, Aussie vernacular included. Many thanks to Ruben Minasian and Robi Peschanski for their interest in my research orientations and for tips on relocating to Stony Brook. I am grateful to Emilian Dudas and Henning Samtleben for agreeing to be part of the jury of my PhD defense. Special thanks to Kostas Skenderis whose research has been very important to my work. Discussions with Michael Bon, Gaetan Borot, Roberto Bondesan, J´eromeDubail, Hadi Go- dazgar, Mahdi Godazgar, Andrea Puhm, Bruno Sciolla and Piotr Tourkine were appreciated. As for those conversations that have been of direct relevance to my field of research interests, I am grateful to Guillaume Beuf, Paul Chesler, Sheer El{Showk, Yoshitaka Hatta, Akikazu Hashimoto, Jan Manschot, Diego Marqu`es, Carlos Nu~nez,Hagen Triendl, Pierre Vanhove and Bert Vercnocke.
  • Magnetic Backgrounds and Tachyonic Instabilities in Closed String Theory

    Magnetic Backgrounds and Tachyonic Instabilities in Closed String Theory

    Magnetic backgrounds and tachyonic instabilities in closed string theory Cite as: AIP Conference Proceedings 607, 269 (2002); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1454381 Published Online: 25 February 2002 A. A. Tseytlin AIP Conference Proceedings 607, 269 (2002); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1454381 607, 269 © 2002 American Institute of Physics. Magnetic Backgrounds and Tachyonic Instabilities in Closed String Theory A.A. Tseytlin Department of Physics, The Ohio State University, Columbus OH 43210-1106, USA Abstract. We consider closed superstrings in Melvin-type magnetic backgrounds. In the case of NS-NS backgrounds, these are exactly solvable as weakly coupled string models with spectrum containing tachyonic modes. Magnetic field allows one to interpolate between free superstring the- ories with periodic and antiperiodic boundary conditions for the fermions around some compact direction, and, in particular, between type 0 and type II string theories. Using "9-11" flip, this inter- polation can be extended to M-theory and may be used to study the issue of tachyon condensation in type 0 string theory. We review related duality proposals, and, in particular, suggest a description of type 0 theory in terms of M-theory in a curved magnetic flux background in which the type 0 tachyon appears to correspond to a state in d=l 1 supergravity fluctuation spectrum. INTRODUCTION Magnetic backgrounds play an important role in field theory and open string theory pro- viding simple solvable models with nontrivial physics content. Similar (approximately) constant magnetic backgrounds in gravitational theories like closed string theory are necessarily curved with an example provided by the Melvin-type flux tube solutions (see, e.g., [1]).
  • Introduction to String Theory A.N

    Introduction to String Theory A.N

    Introduction to String Theory A.N. Schellekens Based on lectures given at the Radboud Universiteit, Nijmegen Last update 6 July 2016 [Word cloud by www.worldle.net] Contents 1 Current Problems in Particle Physics7 1.1 Problems of Quantum Gravity.........................9 1.2 String Diagrams................................. 11 2 Bosonic String Action 15 2.1 The Relativistic Point Particle......................... 15 2.2 The Nambu-Goto action............................ 16 2.3 The Free Boson Action............................. 16 2.4 World sheet versus Space-time......................... 18 2.5 Symmetries................................... 19 2.6 Conformal Gauge................................ 20 2.7 The Equations of Motion............................ 21 2.8 Conformal Invariance.............................. 22 3 String Spectra 24 3.1 Mode Expansion................................ 24 3.1.1 Closed Strings.............................. 24 3.1.2 Open String Boundary Conditions................... 25 3.1.3 Open String Mode Expansion..................... 26 3.1.4 Open versus Closed........................... 26 3.2 Quantization.................................. 26 3.3 Negative Norm States............................. 27 3.4 Constraints................................... 28 3.5 Mode Expansion of the Constraints...................... 28 3.6 The Virasoro Constraints............................ 29 3.7 Operator Ordering............................... 30 3.8 Commutators of Constraints.......................... 31 3.9 Computation of the Central Charge.....................
  • M-Theory Solutions and Intersecting D-Brane Systems

    M-Theory Solutions and Intersecting D-Brane Systems

    M-Theory Solutions and Intersecting D-Brane Systems A Thesis Submitted to the College of Graduate Studies and Research in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Physics and Engineering Physics University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon By Rahim Oraji ©Rahim Oraji, December/2011. All rights reserved. Permission to Use In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for a Postgrad- uate degree from the University of Saskatchewan, I agree that the Libraries of this University may make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for copying of this thesis in any manner, in whole or in part, for scholarly purposes may be granted by the professor or professors who supervised my thesis work or, in their absence, by the Head of the Department or the Dean of the College in which my thesis work was done. It is understood that any copying or publication or use of this thesis or parts thereof for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. It is also understood that due recognition shall be given to me and to the University of Saskatchewan in any scholarly use which may be made of any material in my thesis. Requests for permission to copy or to make other use of material in this thesis in whole or part should be addressed to: Head of the Department of Physics and Engineering Physics 116 Science Place University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, Saskatchewan Canada S7N 5E2 i Abstract It is believed that fundamental M-theory in the low-energy limit can be described effectively by D=11 supergravity.
  • NS Fivebranes in Type 0 String Theory

    NS Fivebranes in Type 0 String Theory

    Preprint typeset in JHEP style. - HYPER VERSION KUL-TF-99/24 NS Fivebranes in Type 0 String Theory∗ Ben Craps† and Frederik Roose Instituut voor theoretische fysica Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium E-mail: Ben.Craps,[email protected] Abstract: The massless degrees of freedom of type 0 NS5-branes are derived. A non-chiral, purely bosonic spectrum is found in both type 0A and 0B. This non-chirality is confirmed by a one-loop computation in the bulk. Some puzzles concerning type 0B S-duality are pointed out in this context. An interpretation of the spectra in terms of “type 0 little strings” is proposed. Keywords: D-branes, String Duality. arXiv:hep-th/9906179v3 8 Oct 1999 ∗Work supported by the European Commission TMR programme ERBFMRX-CT96-0045. †Aspirant FWO, Belgium Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Type 0 strings and D-branes 2 3. NS fivebrane spectra 3 4. Absence of anomalies 4 5. S-duality 5 6. A little string interpretation 8 7. Conclusions 9 1. Introduction Type 0 string theories [1] have recently attracted a lot of attention. They have been used to study the non-supersymmetric field theories living on their D-branes [2]. Moreover, Bergman and Gaberdiel [3] have conjectured that they are supersymmetry breaking orbifolds of M-theory, thus including them in the web of string dualities. For instance, certain circle compactifications of type 0 and type II are proposed to be T-dual. Other predictions of the conjectured duality are that type 0B string theory exhibits S-duality and that the type 0 theories contain non-perturbative fermionic states.
  • NS Fivebranes in Type 0 String Theory∗

    NS Fivebranes in Type 0 String Theory∗

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CERN Document Server Preprint typeset in JHEP style. - HYPER VERSION KUL-TF-99/24 NS Fivebranes in Type 0 String Theory∗ Ben Craps† and Frederik Roose Instituut voor theoretische fysica Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium E-mail: Ben.Craps,[email protected] Abstract: The massless degrees of freedom of type 0 NS5-branes are derived. A non-chiral, purely bosonic spectrum is found in both type 0A and 0B. This non-chirality is confirmed by a one-loop computation in the bulk. Some puzzles concerning type 0B S-duality are pointed out in this context. An interpretation of the spectra in terms of “type 0 little strings” is proposed. Keywords: D-branes, String Duality. ∗Work supported by the European Commission TMR programme ERBFMRX-CT96-0045. yAspirant FWO, Belgium Contents 1. Introduction Type 0 string theories [1] have recently attracted a lot of attention. They have been used to study the non-supersymmetric field theories living on their D-branes [2]. Moreover, Bergman and Gaberdiel [3] have conjectured that they are supersymmetry breaking orbifolds of M-theory, thus including them in the web of string dualities. For instance, certain circle compactifications of type 0 and type II are proposed to be T-dual. Other predictions of the conjectured duality are that type 0B string theory exhibits S-duality and that the type 0 theories contain non-perturbative fermionic states. In Ref. [4] it has been studied how branes transform under type 0/type II T-duality.
  • M(Embrane)-Theory

    M(Embrane)-Theory

    Master of science thesis in physics M(embrane)-Theory Viktor Bengtsson Department of Theoretical Physics Chalmers University of Technology and GÄoteborg University Winter 2003 M(embrane)-Theory Viktor Bengtsson Department of Theoretical Physics Chalmers University of Technology and GÄoteborg University SE-412 96 GÄoteborg, Sweden Abstract We investigate the uses of membranes in theoretical physics. Starting with the bosonic membrane and the formulation of its dynamics we then move forward in time to the introduction of supersymmetry. Matrix theory is introduced and a full proof of the continuous spectrum of the supermembrane is given. After this we deal with various concepts in M-theory (BPS-states, Matrix Theory, torodial compacti¯cations etc.) that are of special importance when motivating the algebraic approach to M-theoretic caluclations. This approach is then dealt with by ¯rst reviewing the prototypical example of the Type IIB R4 amplitude and then the various issues of microscopic derivations of the corresponding results through ¯rst-principle computations in M-theory. This leads us to the mathematics of automorphic forms and the main result of this thesis, a calculation of the p-adic spherical vector in a minimal representation of SO(4; 4; Z) Acknowledgments I would like to extend the warmest thanks to my supervisor Prof. Bengt E.W. Nilsson for his unwavering patience with me during the last year. Many thanks also to my friend and collaborator Dr. Hegarty. I am most grateful to Dr. Anders Wall and the Wall Foundation for funding during the last year. I would like to thank Prof. Seif Randjbar-Daemi and the ICTP, Trieste, for their hospitality during this summer as well as Dr.
  • Introduction to Supergravity

    Introduction to Supergravity

    Introduction to Supergravity Lectures presented by Henning Samtleben at the 13th Saalburg School on Fundamentals and New Methods in Theoretical Physics, September 3 { 14, 2007 typed by Martin Ammon and Cornelius Schmidt-Colinet ||| 1 Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 N = 1 supergravity in D = 4 dimensions 4 2.1 General aspects . 4 2.2 Gauging a global symmetry . 5 2.3 The vielbein formalism . 6 2.4 The Palatini action . 9 2.5 The supersymmetric action . 9 2.6 Results . 14 3 Extended supergravity in D = 4 dimensions 16 3.1 Matter couplings in N = 1 supergravity . 16 3.2 Extended supergravity in D = 4 dimensions . 17 4 Extended supergravity in higher Dimensions 18 4.1 Spinors in higher dimensions . 18 4.2 Eleven-dimensional supergravity . 20 4.3 Kaluza-Klein supergravity . 22 4.4 N = 8 supergravity in D = 4 dimensions . 26 A Variation of the Palatini action 27 2 1 Introduction There are several reasons to consider the combination of supersymmetry and gravitation. The foremost is that if supersymmetry turns out to be realized at all in nature, then it must eventually appear in the context of gravity. As is characteristic for supersymmetry, its presence is likely to improve the quantum behavior of the theory, particularly interesting in the context of gravity, a notoriously non-renormalizable theory. Indeed, in supergravity divergences are typically delayed to higher loop orders, and to date it is still not ruled out that the maximally supersymmetric extension of four-dimensional Einstein gravity might eventually be a finite theory of quantum gravity | only recently very tempting indications in this direction have been unvealed.
  • The Linear Dilaton: from the Clockwork Mechanism to Its Supergravity Embedding

    The Linear Dilaton: from the Clockwork Mechanism to Its Supergravity Embedding

    The linear dilaton: from the clockwork mechanism to its supergravity embedding Chrysoula Markou August 30, 2019 SQS '19, Yerevan Chrysoula Markou The linear dilaton 1 / 19 Overview 1 The clockwork mechanism The clockwork scalar Motivation and basic references The clockwork graviton Continuum 2 Little String Theory Definition Geometry Phenomenology 3 Supergravity embedding Structure of N = 2, D = 5 Supergravity Effective supergravity Chrysoula Markou The linear dilaton 2 / 19 The clockwork mechanism The clockwork scalar Setup 1 massless scalar π(x), symmetry U(1) N+1 2 N+1 copies: πj(x), j = 0; 1;:::;N , symmetry U(1) (at least) 3 explicit breaking U(1)N+1 ! U(1) via a mass{mixing that involves near{neighbours only N N−1 1 X 1 X L = − @ π @µπ − m2 (π − qπ )2 + ::: 2 µ j j 2 j j+1 j=0 j=0 q treats the site j and the site j + 1 asymmetrically 1 1=q 1=q2 1=qN j = 0 j = 1 j = 2 j = N Chrysoula Markou The linear dilaton 3 / 19 The clockwork mechanism The clockwork scalar Eigenmodes π = Oa 1 N0 massless Goldstone a0, Oj0 = qj h (j+1)kπ i 2 jkπ massive Clockwork gears ak, Ojk = Nk q sin N+1 − sin N+1 now couple eg. topological term to the N{th site only ( N ) 1 µν 1 X k 1 µν πN GµνGe = a0 − (−) ak GµνGe f f0 fk k=1 N 1 f0=f ∼ q : exponential enhancement 3=2 2 fk=f ∼ N =k: mild N dependance Chrysoula Markou The linear dilaton 4 / 19 The clockwork mechanism Motivation and basic references the clockwork as a renormalizable scalar field theory: Choi and Im '15 Kaplan and Rattazzi '15 (see also natural inflation and relaxion models) the clockwork as an effective low{energy field theory: Giudice and McCullough '16 Recipe: N + 1 of particle P whose masslessness is protected by symmetry S & explicit breaking via near{neighbour interactions Known examples for the following spins: 0, 1=2, 1, 2 growing pheno literature (LHC signatures, inflation, .
  • Marcus Spradlin

    Marcus Spradlin

    Marcus Spradlin Professor Brown University Department of Physics, and Box 1843 Brown Theoretical Physics Center 182 Hope Street Email: Marcus [email protected] Providence, RI 02912 USA Education 1996 AB in Physics, Princeton University, summa cum laude 1997 MASt in Applied Mathematics, University of Cambridge, with distinction 1999 MA in Physics, Harvard University 2001 PhD in Physics, Harvard University Advisor: Andrew Strominger Dissertation Topic: AdS2 Black Holes and Soliton Moduli Spaces Professional Appointments 2001–2003 Research Associate, Princeton University 2003–2005 Assistant Research Physicist, Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics 2005–2006 Member, School of Natural Sciences, Institute for Advanced Study 2006–2011 Manning Assistant Professor, Brown University 2011 Member, School of Natural Sciences, Institute for Advanced Study 2012–2013 Scientific Associate, Theory Group, CERN 2011–2017 Associate Professor, Brown University 2017–2018 Member, School of Natural Sciences, Institute for Advanced Study 2017– Professor, Brown University Academic Honors 1994 Barry M. Goldwater Scholarship 1995 Kusaka Memorial Prize, Princeton University Department of Physics 1995 Barry M. Goldwater Scholarship 1996 Kusaka Memorial Prize, Princeton University Department of Physics 1996 Elected to Sigma Xi 1996 Elected to Phi Beta Kappa 1996 NSF Graduate Research Fellowship in Theoretical Physics 2000 Maurice Goldhaber Prize, Harvard University Department of Physics 2006 Appointed Manning Assistant Professor, Brown University 2007 DOE Outstanding Junior Investigator Award 2008 Richard B. Salomon Faculty Research Award, Brown University 2017 Simons Fellowship in Theoretical Physics 2018 Elected Fellow of the American Physical Society 1 1 Jan 2021 Publications Over 6,400 citations, h-index 44 (according to Google Scholar) ♥ = 250+ citations (6) ♦ = 100+ citations (9) ♣ = 50+ citations (22) Books Edited 1.