DOCSLIB.ORG

Natural History Collections

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Natural History Collections Appendix H: Natural History Collections Page A. Overview. .......................................................................................................................................... H.1 What information can I find in this appendix?. ................................................................................... H:1 What are natural history collections?..... ............................................................................................ H:1 Why does the NPS collect and maintain natural history collections?. ............................................... H:2 Why are natural history collections important?. ................................................................................. H:2 What determines how NPS natural history collections are used?. .................................................... H:3 Where can I find further information on NPS natural history collections?.. ....................................... H:4 B. Natural History Collections.. ........................................................................................................... H:4 What kinds of specimens are commonly found in NPS natural history collections?. ........................ H:4 What characterizes NPS biological collections?. ............................................................................... H:5 Why are NPS biological collections important?.. ............................................................................... H:5 What kinds of specimens are found in NPS biological collections?. ................................................. H:6 What are some examples of NPS biological collections?. ................................................................ H:6 What characterizes NPS geological collections?.. ............................................................................ H:6 Why are NPS geological collections important?. ............................................................................... H:6 What kinds of specimens are found in NPS geological collections?... .............................................. H:7 What are some examples of NPS geological collections?. ............................................................... H:7 What characterizes NPS paleontological collections?. ...................................................................... H:7 What kinds of specimens are found in NPS paleontological collections?. ........................................ H:8 Why are NPS paleontology collections important?. ........................................................................... H:8 What are some examples of NPS paleontological collections?. ....................................................... H:9 C. Collecting Natural History Specimens… ....................................................................................... H:9 Who collects natural history specimens in the park?.. ....................................................................... H:9 What are some of the purposes for collecting?.. ............................................................................... H:9 Why is the long-term preservation of specimens important?... ......................................................... H:10 What has driven recent growth of NPS natural history collections?.. ................................................ H:10 What is the Inventory and Monitoring Program (I&M)?. .................................................................... H:10 What is an All-Taxa Biodiversity Inventory (ATBI)?.. ......................................................................... H:11 What is a BioBlitz?. ............................................................................................................................ H:12 Must all specimens in a collection be collected within park boundaries?. ......................................... H:12 What laws and regulations apply to collecting natural history specimens in parks?. ........................ H:13 Are there other laws or mandates that may require additional permits for collecting natural history specimens in parks?. .............................................................................. H:13 What are Threatened and Endangered species?. ............................................................................. H:14 Does the museum have to track living specimens?. ......................................................................... H:14 D. Natural History Collecting Permits.. .............................................................................................. H:14 How does the NPS authorize the collection of natural history specimens and determine their disposition?. ........................................................................................................... H:14 What does 36CFR2.5 require?. ......................................................................................................... H:15 What is the Research Permit and Reporting System (RPRS)?. ........................................................ H:15 What are the goals of the RPRS?...................................................................................................... H:15 Who is required to have a permit?. .................................................................................................... H:16 Must NPS employees use RPRS?. ................................................................................................... H:16 Where can I find the General Conditions for the Scientific Research and Collecting Permit?. ......... H:16 Can a park add additional conditions to a permit? ............................................................................ H:16 Page What issues should a curator consider when reviewing an application for a research permit?. ....... H:17 Who is responsible for curation costs?. ............................................................................................. H:18 What is benefits sharing? .................................................................................................................. H:19 What is a benefits-sharing agreement?... .......................................................................................... H:20 What if no specimens are collected?. ................................................................................................ H:20 How do parks handle permits for multi-park collecting projects?. ..................................................... H:20 E. Accessioning Natural History Collections. ................................................................................... H:21 Must I accession NPS natural history specimens into the park museum collection?. ....................... H:21 How do I accession natural history collections?. ............................................................................... H:21 When do I accession natural history collections?. ............................................................................. H:21 What information do I need for an accession?. ................................................................................. H:22 Can the NPS convey ownership of natural history collections from park lands?. ............................. H:23 May I exchange duplicate specimens?... ........................................................................................... H:23 Can I loan natural history specimens?............................................................................................... H:24 What procedures must I follow when loaning natural history collections?. ....................................... H:24 Can I deaccession natural history collections?. ................................................................................. H:24 What documentation is required for unaccessioned specimens consumed through analysis as part of the research project?.......................................................................... H:25 What documentation is required for cataloged specimens consumed through destructive analysis?. ...................................................................................................... H:25 F. Cataloging Natural History Collections. ........................................................................................ H:25 Where do I find procedures for cataloging natural history collections?. ............................................ H:25 Who is responsible for cataloging natural history collections?. ......................................................... H:25 Who pays for cataloging natural history collections?......................................................................... H:25 What materials for cataloging collections must I give to the collector?. ............................................ H:26 Must I use ICMS to catalog natural history collections?. ................................................................... H:26 What fields on the catalog record must the collector complete?. ...................................................... H:26 Who is responsible for cataloging the documentation associated with the specimens?. .................. H:27 Who is responsible for monitoring the accuracy of the records?. ...................................................... H:27 What documentation must the collector submit to you?.. .................................................................. H:28 Who prepares the natural history labels and marks the specimens?. ............................................... H:28 How do
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Non-Native and Invasive Animals of Alaska: a Comprehensive List and Select Species Status Reports
    NON-NATIVE AND INVASIVE ANIMALS OF ALASKA: A COMPREHENSIVE LIST AND SELECT SPECIES STATUS REPORTS FINAL REPORT Jodi McClory Tracey Gotthardt NON-NATIVE AND INVASIVE ANIMALS OF ALASKA: A COMPREHENSIVE LIST AND SELECT SPECIES STATUS REPORTS FINAL REPORT Jodi McClory and Tracey Gotthardt Alaska Natural Heritage Program Environment and Natural Resources Institute University of Alaska Anchorage 707 A Street, Anchorage AK 99501 January 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 INTRODUCTION 5 METHODOLOGY 5 RESULTS 6 DISCUSSION AND FUTURE DIRECTION 6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 7 LITERATURE CITED 8 APPENDICES I: LIST OF NON-NATIVE ANIMAL SPECIES DOCUMENTED IN ALASKA 9 II: LIST OF NON-NATIVE ANIMAL SPECIES WITH THE POTENTIAL FOR INVASION IN ALASKA 17 III: STATUS REPORTS FOR SELECT NON-NATIVE ANIMAL SPECIES OF ALASKA 21 PACIFIC CHORUS FROG.......................................................................................................................... 22 RED-LEGGED FROG ................................................................................................................................24 ATLANTIC SALMON................................................................................................................................. 27 NORTHERN PIKE ..................................................................................................................................... 30 AMBER-MARKED BIRCH LEAFMINER .................................................................................................... 33 BIRCH LEAFMINER ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • (Dip: Agromyzidae): a Second British Record and a New Host Plant ______
    Newsletter: July 2008 Issue 13 ________________________________________________________________________________________ Aulagromyza luteoscutellata (Dip: Agromyzidae): A Second British record and a new host plant ____________________________________ On 16th July 2008, Keith Palmer discovered mines of what he suspected were Aulagromyza luteoscutellata at sites in Foxbush, Hildenborough, Tonbridge, Kent (VC16). He sent them to Rob Edmunds, who confirmed the identification. As far as we are aware this represents the second record of this miner on the UK. The mines are characteristically dark green when fresh and show the faint chevron frass patterning. An occupied mine is shown opposite. This miner was discovered as new to the UK by RE in 2007 in Hampshire. The geographical separation of this new discovery would lead one to suspect that A. luteoscutellata is a previously overlooked species in Britain. KP found the larva mining Snowberry (Symphoricarpos albus), which is a new host plant record in the UK and in line with it s known hosts in Europe. Photos © Rob Edmunds Changes in the nomenclature of leafmining sawflies: ____________________________________ There are at least 2 species of Fenusa mining Ulmus leaves in Western Europe: This website is adopting the new nomenclature (a) Fenusa ulmi (Sundevall, 1847) proposed by Liston and Sheppard in their Checklist of which seems to prefer feeding on British and Irish Hymenoptera Symphyta (2008). Wych Elms (Ulmus glabra). In N. America it is found on a wide range of Ulmus species. The leafminer changes are: (b) Fenusa altenhoferi (Liston, 1993) 1. Heterarthrus healyi, feeding on Acer (=Kaliofenusa carpinifoliae), which campestre, becomes Heterarthrus is found on "Field Elms" such as wuestneii (Konow, 1905).
    [Show full text]
  • UTAH PESTS Diagnostic Laboratory
    Utah Plant Pest UTAH PESTS Diagnostic Laboratory USU Extension Summer 2017 / QUARTERLY Vol. XI NEWSLETTER IN THIS ISSUE High Tunnel Arthropod Pest Management High Tunnel Arthropod Pest Management p. 01 Elm Seed Bug p. 3 Featured Author: Dr. S. Nicole Frey on Choosing the Best Traps for Controlling Pocket Gophers p. 04 Pest Spotlight: Gypsy Moth p. 06 USDA Downy Mildew of Spinach p. 07 High tunnels can extend the growing season in a cold location such as northern Utah. CRISPR DNA Technology for Managing Pests p. 08 Use of high tunnels or field greenhouses Some of the primary tactics that can be used Neonicotinoid: Retailer is a popular production method in Utah to effectively suppress pests in high tunnels Phase-Out and Potential to substantially extend the length of the include: Alternative growing season. Tunnels can provide p. 10 benefits beyond temperature regulation, • Place floating row cover over Predicting Billbug such as increasing humidity, shading, and susceptible plants for concealment Management in reducing populations of some pests through and to exclude pests that have entered Intermountain West Turf exclusion and concealment. However, some the high tunnel. Row covers, or low p. 11 insect and related pests can thrive in the tunnels, can exclude insects that fly Elm Leafminer plastic-covered environment. If plants are or jump onto plants, including thrips, p. 12 irrigated with driplines, the dry soil between flea beetles, leafhoppers, whiteflies, plant rows is a conducive location for ant aphids, leafminers and grasshoppers. IPM in the News p. 14 nests. Moist, shaded plants can be attractive Additionally, curly top virus infection of to slugs and earwigs.
    [Show full text]
  • Nearctic Sawflies III. Heterarthrinae: Adults and Larvae
    2 8 1.0 :; 11111 . 1111/2.5 1.0 I~ ~II~ I" ~ m~ &:; :: a~ 1.1 1.1 111111.8 1 6 1I1I1!:25 11111,·4 11111 . 111111.25 111111.4 111111.6 MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANO,\RDS-1963-A NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS·1963-A t;' NEARCTIC SAWFLIFS ill. Heterarthrinae: Adults and Larvae (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae) By DAVID R. SMITH Technical Bulletin No. 1420 Agricultural Research Service U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Washington, D.C. Issued January 1971 For sale bv the Superintendent of Documents. U.S. Government Printing Office Washington. D.C. 20402 - Price 60 cents C.ontents Page Hosts ...._ ...__ ... _. ____ .... _.__......_____.___.__________.._____ 3 Systematic arrangement ___......... _._..... _.. _._______________ 4 Keys to Heterarthrinae genera............... _........ _.... _... __ ..... _ .._______..__ 6 Keys to leaf-mining larvae of Betula and Quercus___ ..._____.______ 8 Trib~ Caliroini ..... _ ...... " ...................... _ ... _-_ .. _--_.__.._------- 8 Genus Endelo1ltyia Ashmead... _... __.. _ .....______..____.______ 9 Genus Caliroa O. Costa...............____...__•._______._.. _.. _._.__ 12 Tribe Hetcrarthrhi ........_. __.... _ ........__.......________.. ___ . _____... _ 30 Genus HeterM·thrulJ Stephens.........__......_ ...... _.... _._ .....______ 30 Tribe Fenusini. ... .. ... ................... ._.... _ ....... __............ _.. __... _ ...____ 32 Genus Metallus Forbes.........................._...... _... 33 Genus l'.{essa Leach............... _._ ......... _ ... _..._ ... _ ...... _ ...__.______. 38 Genus Setaba.ra Ross................_.....__.. _ ........... __... _________ 45 Genus Profenusa MacGillivray.............__......... _........ ___.__._..__ 46 Genus Bidigitus Smith ...._.....__....._.
    [Show full text]
  • Leafmining Insects No
    I N S E C T S E R I E S TREES & SHRUBS Leafmining Insects no. 5.548 by W.S. Cranshaw, D.A. Leatherman and J.R. Feucht 1 (Revised 1/09) Leafminers are insects that have a habit of feeding within leaves or needles, producing tunneling injuries. Quick Facts... Several kinds of insects have developed this habit, including larvae of moths (Lepidoptera), beetles (Coleoptera), sawflies Leafminers are insects that feed (Hymenoptera) and flies (Diptera). Most within a leaf, producing large of these insects feed for their entire larval blotches or meandering tunnels. period within the leaf. Some will also pupate within the leaf mine, while others Although leafminer injuries are have larvae that cut their way out when full- Figure 1: Spinach leafminer egg mass. conspicuous, most leafminers grown to pupate in the soil. produce injuries that have little, if Leafminers are sometimes classified by the pattern of the mine which any, effect on plant health. they create. Serpentine leaf mines wind snake-like across the leaf gradually widening as the insect grows. More common are various blotch leaf mines which Most leafminers have many are generally irregularly rounded. One subgroup of these are the tentiform natural controls that will leafminers, which produce bulging blotch-type mines that curve upwards normally provide good control of somewhat like a tent as the damaged leaf tissue dry. Mining patterns often are combinations of the above, such as species that initially produce serpentine mines leafminers. but terminate by making the enlarged leaf cavity of a blotch mine. Areas mined by insects die and dry out.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Host-Plant Use on Speciation and Parasitoid Community Structure
    dissertations Sanna Leppänen Effect of host-plant use on | Sanna| 154 Leppänen | speciation and parasitoid community structure in internal-feeding sawflies Effect use on speciation host-plant of and parasitoid community structure internal-feeding in sawflies Sanna Leppänen Effect of host-plant use on speciation and parasitoid community structure in internal-feeding sawflies Publications of the University of Eastern Finland Dissertations in Forestry and Natural Sciences Publications of the University of Eastern Finland Dissertations in Forestry and Natural Sciences isbn: 978-952-61-1560-3 (printed) issnl: 1798-5668 issn: 1798-5668 isbn 978-952-61-1561-0 (pdf) issnl: 1798-5668 issn: 1798-5676 SANNA LEPPÄNEN Effect of host-plant use on speciation and parasitoid community structure in internal-feeding sawflies Publications of the University of Eastern Finland Dissertations in Forestry and Natural Sciences 154 Academic Dissertation To be presented by permission of the Faculty of Science and Forestry for public examination in the Auditorium N100 in Natura Building at the University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu, on September, 19, 2014, at 12 o’clock. Department of Biology Author’s address: University of Eastern Finland Department of Biology P.O.Box 111 80101 JOENSUU FINLAND email: [email protected] Supervisors: Associate professor Tommi Nyman, Ph.D. University of Eastern Finland Department of Biology P.O.Box 111 80101 JOENSUU FINLAND email: [email protected] Professor Heikki Roininen, Ph.D. University of Eastern Finland Department of Biology P.O.Box 111 80101 JOENSUU FINLAND email: [email protected] Reviewers: Docent Niklas Janz, Ph.D Stockholm University Department of Zoology 106 91 STOCKHOLM SWEDEN Grano email: [email protected] Joensuu, 2014 Research scientist Carlos Lopez-Vaamonde, Ph.D Editors: Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Effectiveness of Interspecific Hybridization for Incorporating Birch Leafminer (Fenusa Pusilla) Resistance Into White-Barked Betula
    J. AMER. SOC. HORT. SCI. 127(6):957–962. 2002. Effectiveness of Interspecific Hybridization for Incorporating Birch Leafminer (Fenusa pusilla) Resistance into White-barked Betula William A. Hoch1 Department of Horticulture, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706 Geunhwa Jung2 Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706 Brent H. McCown3 Department of Horticulture, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706 ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Betula spp., interspecific hybridization, Agrilus anxius, gene dosage, larval antibiosis, insect resistance, polyploidy, tree breeding ABSTRACT. A significant pest affecting commonly planted Betula spp. is the birch leafminer (Fenusa pusilla Lepeletier), an insect that can be present in large populations in the landscape and can greatly reduce the vigor and ornamental value of these trees. Twenty-two interspecific crosses were performed between leafminer resistant and susceptible Betula species in an attempt to create the novel combination of ornamental white bark and significant leafminer resistance. Of the nine successful crosses, two produced resistant offspring. Progeny of the diploid x hexaploid cross B. turkestanica Litvin (2x) x B. alleghaniensis Britt. (6x) displayed a broad range of resistance levels, likely the result of segregating alleles contributed by the hexaploid parent. All crosses involving highly resistant individuals of B. costata Trautv. (2x) yielded leafminer susceptible progeny. These results suggest that the larval antibiosis demonstrated by B. alleghaniensis and B. costata is inherited as a recessive trait, and exhibits a gene dosage effect as evidenced by the B. turkestanica x B. alleghaniensis offspring. While most progeny of the B. populifolia Marsh (2x) x B. maximowicziana Regal (2x) cross were susceptible, a single resistant offspring, which was found to be triploid (3x), displayed a mechanism of resistance similar to that of a hypersensitive response.
    [Show full text]
  • The Birch Leaf-Mining Sawfly, Fenusa Pumila Klug
    Bulletin 348 February, 1933 I I / . , , THE BIRCH LEAF-MINING SAWFLY I ! FA- pumila lug 1 I Bulletin 348 February, 1933 THE BIRCH LEAF-MINING SAWFLY Fenusa pumila Klug ROGER B. FRIEND Mnnnertirut Agricultural Exporitnont Btntinn .L NPIUT!juuen ,CONNECTICUT AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION BOARD OF CONTROL His Excellency, Governor \Vilhur L. Cross, ex-oficio, President \ . Elijah Rogers. Ifice-Presidcr~t............................ Southington George A. Hopsan, Secrrlnry. ..........................Mount Carmel ? William I,. Slate, Director Trenrnrer. ...................New Haven Joseph W.Alsap ............................................. Avon Edward C. Schneider.. .................................lliddletown S. McLean Buckingham. ...............................fatertown Charles G. Morris.. .................................... .Se\vtonn STAFF Analytical E. M. BAII.EY.Px.D.. Chrniirl in Chrrr~c. Chemir~ry. C. E. SHEPAID O~vnxL. NCII.AX Hnllilv Plsil~a.PH.D. v.T. kmrs D~woC. WALOEN.B.S. Fa*);= C. SnsLoor, Loboratnry ~rsinon!. V. L. CHURCHILL,snv~nrina aao?zr. M*+. A. B. Vosauaa~..scrrrinr,,. Botany. 0. P. C~rnronSc.D. Botonirl in Chorgs. E. S. sroorma;. B.~..'l'omlogirt. hllssP~oar;xc. A. MCCOUUICT.PH.D..Polhobyi.~~ A. A. DUNI.AP.PII.D.. Arrinonl ~Myrolo~ist. A. D. MCDUINELI..Gcrirroi A.%rirlonl. hlxs. %-. W. KBI.SEY.Srrrdory. Entomology n'. E. Balrroa. Px.D.. D.Sc.. Rnlomologisl in Cliur~r. 31clir Enlomolo#irl. B. H. WAL~~Y.B.Asa. hl. P. ZAFPE,B.S. PHIL~PGARXAX. PH.D. 1 Assirlonl Enromobairrs. Roam B. l*n~~wo.PH.D. NEIII.Y TOKSICK,>!.A. 1 Jo~xT. As~wonrm.Depury in Chorgr ojGihry ,Mol;r Conbol. R. C. BOTS~ORU.Deauh in Chorgcol.lloryr'ilo Eiinrinolio,~. J. P JUHISON. &S.. U~Dulyin Cinrgc ol lrialii und Jupanrsr Rldtr ouo,on,inrs.
    [Show full text]
  • "Bionomics of the Alder Sawfly Fenusa Dohrnii (Tischbein)"
    "BIONOMICS OF THE ALDER SAWFLY FENUSA DOHRNII (TISCHBEIN)" by Kulapu Arachchige Don Wilmot Senaratne, B.Sc.(Ceyl). Thesis submitted to the University of London for the degree of Ph.D. East Mailing Research Station Maidstone Kent October 1978. 1 ABSTRACT Field and laboratory studies during 1975-77 have shown that Fenusa dohrnii is bivoltine in south - east England with adults emerging during May - June and July - August. Average fecundity was estimated to be about 62 eggs per female, the number being correlated with both weight and tibial length of adult. At 15°C and 21°C respectively, the embryonic period was 13 and 7.5 days whilst larval development took 26.6 and 16.9 days. Selection of a cocooning site in the soil by the sixth instar larva was random; no active burrowing was observed, but the larvae gained entry via cracks and patches of loose soil. Prepupal diapause was terminated to a varying degree when cocoons were chilled for about 62 days at -1.1°C, 3.3°C, 10°C and field temperatures. The highest percentage emergence of adults was from cocoons exposed to field temperatures and progressively fewer emerged as the chilling temperature was lowered from 10°C to -1.1°C. For all treatments mean time for adults to emerge after transfer to 21°C decreased with increasing duration of chilling. In the field, distribution of eggs of the second generation was correlated more closely with the negative binomial than Poisson , Neyman type A or logarithmic distributions. Studies of the population development indicated that the generation mortality varied from 95 - 98 percent of which mortality of larvae within the mines and mortality of larva'VI due to parasitism by Lathrolestes pictilis (Ichneumonidae) and Ichneutes laevis (13raconidae) contributed most towards 2 the generation K value.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Status of Invasive Alien Birch-Leafmining Sawflies (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae) in Canada, with Keys to Species
    201 Current status of invasive alien birch-leafmining sawflies (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae) in Canada, with keys to species Scott C. Digweed Northern Forestry Centre, Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada, 5320 – 122 Street NW, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6H 3S5 Chris J.K. MacQuarrie Northern Forestry Centre, Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada, 5320 – 122 Street NW, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6H 3S5, and Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2H1 David W. Langor,1 Daryl J.M. Williams Northern Forestry Centre, Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada, 5320 – 122 Street NW, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6H 3S5 John R. Spence Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2H1 Kathryn L. Nystrom Great Lakes Forestry Centre, Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada, 1219 Queen Street E, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada P6A 2E5 Louis Morneau Service des relevés et des diagnostics, Direction de l’environnement et de la protection des forêts, Ministère des Ressources naturelles et de la Faune, local D.2.370a, 2700 rue Einstein, Québec, Québec, Canada G1P 3W8 Abstract—In the 20th century, five species of birch-leafmining sawflies were inadvertently in- troduced from Europe to North America: Heterarthrus nemoratus (Fallén), Fenusa pumila Leach, Profenusa thomsoni (Konow), Fenusella nana (Klug), and Scolioneura vicina Konow. All have been recorded at outbreak levels in North America, and three (F. pumila, P. thomsoni, and H. nemoratus) have been the targets of successful biological control programs. The most recently detected species, F. nana and S. vicina, are good candidates for future biological control in Can- ada.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Inventories in High Gear: DNA Barcoding Facilitates a Rapid Biotic Survey of a Temperate Nature Reserve
    Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e6313 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.3.e6313 Taxonomic Paper Biodiversity inventories in high gear: DNA barcoding facilitates a rapid biotic survey of a temperate nature reserve Angela C Telfer‡, Monica R Young‡§, Jenna Quinn , Kate Perez‡, Crystal N Sobel‡, Jayme E Sones‡, Valerie Levesque-Beaudin‡, Rachael Derbyshire‡, Jose Fernandez-Triana|, Rodolphe Rougerie¶, Abinah Thevanayagam‡, Adrian Boskovic‡, Alex V Borisenko‡#, Alex Cadel , Allison Brown‡, Anais Pages¤, Anibal H Castillo‡, Annegret Nicolai«, Barb Mockford Glenn Mockford», Belén Bukowski˄, Bill Wilson»§, Brock Trojahn , Carole Ann Lacroix˅, Chris Brimblecombe¦,ˀ‡ Christoper Hay , Christmas Ho , Claudia Steinke‡, Connor P Warne‡, Cristina Garrido Cortesˁ, Daniel Engelking‡, Danielle Wright‡, Dario A Lijtmaer˄, David Gascoigne», David Hernandez Martich₵, Derek Morningstarℓ, Dirk Neumann ₰, Dirk Steinke‡, Donna DeBruin Marco DeBruin»,ˁ Dylan Dobias , Elizabeth Sears‡,ˁ Ellen Richard , Emily Damstra», Evgeny V Zakharov‡, Frederic Labergeˁ, Gemma E Collins¦, Gergin A Blagoev‡, Gerrie Grainge», Graham Ansell‡,₱ ¦ Greg Meredith , Ian Hogg , Jaclyn McKeown‡‡, Janet Topan , Jason Bracey», Jerry Guenther», Jesse Sills-Gilligan‡‡, Joseph Addesi , Joshua Persi‡, Kara K S Layton₳, Kareina D'Souza‡,₴ »Kencho Dorji , Kevin Grundy , Kirsti Nghidinwa₣, Kylee Ronnenberg‡, Kyung Min Lee₮, Linxi Xie ₦,‡ Liuqiong Lu , Lyubomir Penev₭, Mailyn Gonzalez₲, Margaret E Rosati‽, Mari Kekkonen‡, Maria Kuzmina‡, Marianne Iskandar‡, Marko Mutanen₮, Maryam Fatahi‡, Mikko Pentinsaari₮, Miriam
    [Show full text]
  • Dispersal of Fenusa Dohrnii (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae) from an Alnus Short-Rotation Forest Plantation
    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 24 Number 2 - Summer 1991 Number 2 - Summer Article 1 1991 June 1991 Dispersal of Fenusa Dohrnii (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae) From an Alnus Short-Rotation Forest Plantation Elwood R. Hart Iowa State University Richard B. Hall Iowa State University Roger D. Hanna Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Hart, Elwood R.; Hall, Richard B.; and Hanna, Roger D. 1991. "Dispersal of Fenusa Dohrnii (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae) From an Alnus Short-Rotation Forest Plantation," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 24 (2) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol24/iss2/1 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Hart et al.: Dispersal of <i>Fenusa Dohrnii</i> (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae) 1991 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST 63 DISPERSAL OF FENUSA DOHRNII (HYMENOPTERA: TENTHREDINIDAE) FROM AN ALNUS SHORT·ROTATION FOREST PLANTATION 2 Elwood R. Hartl, 2, Richard B. HaU , and Roger D. Hanna2 ABSTRACT The European alder leafminer, Fenusa dohrnii, is a defoliating insect pest of Alnus in short-rotation forest plantations. A 2-year study was performed to quan­ tify movement from infested stands to uninfested areas. Sticky traps and potted monitor trees were installed at different locations within and at various distances from (0,5, 10, and 20 m) an infested stand to measure adult flight and oviposition activity, respectively.
    [Show full text]