DOCSLIB.ORG

Islamic Ornament

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

slamicrnamentegacy of atentiquity Islamic Ornament ARH 394/MDV 392M/MES 386 Wednesdays 10-1 Stephennie Mulder Instructor email: [email protected] Classroom Location: ART 3.433 Office: DFA 2.516 Class Meeting Time: W 10-1 Office Hours: Friday 10-11 Islamic art is famous for its tradition of ornamented surfaces, while Western art has often used ornament primarily to highlight or enhance the impact of an image. This course is a comparative study of the role of ornament, which takes as its founding premise that both Islamic and European art emerged from the same Late Antique visual milieu: in which abstract, geometric, and vegetal ornament played a key, (though often neglected) role. The study of ornament has a long and important history in art and design, but with the advent of modernism, ornament was deemed ethically suspect and inimical to art’s higher purposes. Nevertheless, in the past few decades, under the aegis of postmodern theory, ornament has assumed a renewed significance. We will explore multiple scholars’ perspectives on ornament: its practical function and creation, its ability to transform surfaces and thereby change their reception and meaning, and its role as a semiotic device and broader social function as a marker of class, faith, or exoticism. An important proposal we will explore is the idea that ornament is not mere “decoration,” but rather has a rich functional and symbolic role to play in the human response to and understanding of art. With this role in mind, a key skill students will acquire in this course is the ability to make a visual analysis of a work of art whose primary feature is its ornament. What is the place of abstraction, and when and how is it employed? To what degree may we say ornament is linked to the natural world, especially vegetal ornament? How, in Islamic art, does writing function as ornament? What is phenomenological promise of ornament, its role in the enhancement of diversion and pleasure, and how does ornament fulfill that promise? We will also explore the way in which ornament has a distinctly transient role, how it is often associated with a conception of the “exotic” and as such, tends to move fluidly across boundaries of medium, culture, and society. Examples of this transience range from the reception in Islamic lands of medieval Chinese porcelain, to medieval Europe’s hungry market for elaborately decorated Islamic metalwork and textiles. slamicrnamentegacy of atentiquity Class Requirements: Attendance and participation Periodic presentations of readings Presentation of research project to class at end of semester Research paper on topic of your choosing (15-20 pgs.) Required Texts: Ernst Gombrich, The Sense of Order: A Study in the Psychology of Decorative Art, (New York, 1979). James Trilling, The Language of Ornament, (New York: Thames and Hudson, 2001). 1 Accommodations: If you need accommodations for exceptional needs please notify me at the beginning of the semester by obtaining a letter from the Services for Students with Disabilities Office. You may contact the SSD Office at 471-6259 or 471-4641 TTY. slamicrnamentegacy of atentiquity Week 1 • August 29 Introductory Lecture & Discussion PART ONE: Theoretical Foundations for the Study of Ornament Week 2 What is Ornament and…Why Should We Care? • September 5 *James Trilling, “Introduction”, from Ornament: A Modern Perspective, pp. 3-17. *James Trilling, “Preface” and “Chapter 1: Appreciating Ornament”, from The Language of Ornament, pp. 22-90 (but don’t despair, it’s at least half pictures!) *Eva Baer, “Introduction”, from Islamic Ornament, pp. 1-5. *Oleg Grabar, “Introduction”, from The Mediation of Ornament, pp. 3-7. Week 3 Biology and Perception or: Is a Desire for Ornament Innate? • September 12 *Robert Gregory, “Learning How to See”, and “Realities of Art”, from Eye and Brain, the Psychology of Seeing, pp. 137-193. *E. H. Gombrich, “Introduction: Order and Purpose in Nature”, from The Sense of Order, pp. 1-16. Week 4 Patterns and Processes • September 19 *James Trilling, “Ornament as a Conventional System”, from The Language of Ornament, pp. 146-184. *E. H. Gombrich, “The Challenge of Constraints”, from The Sense of Order, pp. 63-94 Week 5 Oleg Grabar and The Pleasure Principle Psycholanalytic and Emotional Apects of Art and Design • September 26 *SKIM and read summary on pp. 74-77: Ray Crozier, “Form and Design” from Manufactured Pleasures: Psychological Responses to Design, pp. 40-77. 2 *Jonathan Harris, “Psychoanalysis and radical politics after the 1960s”, “Self, sex, society, and culture”, “Psychoanalysis and systems of signification”, and “Sight, social ordering, and subjectivity”, from The New Art History (pp. 130-160) *Oleg Grabar, “A Theory of Intermediaries in Art”, from The Mediation of Ornament, pp. 9-46. slamicrnamentegacy of atentiquity PART TWO: Islamic Ornament Week 6 Late Antique Art and its Interlocutors • October 3 *Peter Brown, ““A World Restored: Roman Society in the Fourth Century”, from The World of Late Antiquity, pp. 34-47. * No Author, Sassanid Empire (ca. 2 pp) *Edith Porada, The Art of the Sassanians (ca. 10 pp.) *Claude Cernuschi, “Adolf Loos, Alois Riegl, and the Debate on Ornament in Fin-de-Siècle Vienna”, in Blair and Bloom, Cosmophila, pp. 45-56. *Jas´ Elsner, “The Birth of Late Antiquity: Riegl and Strzygowski in 1901,” Art History 25 (2002), 358–379. *SKIM Alois Riegl, “Foreword” and “The Leading Characteristics of Late Roman Kunstwollen”, from Late Roman Art Industry (Spätrömische Kunstindustrie), trans. Rolf Winken, pp. XI-XXIV and 223-234. *Ellen Swift, “Introduction” and second half of Chapter 1, “Interiors: Non-figurative Floor Mosaics and Other Domestic Decoration,” from Style and Function in Roman Decoration, pp. 1-25 and 70- 104. Week 7 Islamic Art, Ornament, and Aesthetics: an Introduction • October 10 *Barbara Brend, “Introduction”, from Islamic Art, pp. 10-19. *Valérie Gonzalez, “Introduction” and “Beauty and the Aesthetic Experience in Classical Arabic Thought”, from Beauty and Islam, pp. 1-25. *Sheila Blair and Jonathan Bloom, “Ornament and Islamic Art”, and “Insular and Islamic Cosmophilic Responses to the Classical Past”, from Cosmophilia: Islamic Art from the David Collection, Copenhagen, pp. 9-30 and 39-44. Week 8 Geometry and Interlace in Islamic Ornament • October 17 *James Trilling, “Interlace”, from The Language of Ornament, pp. 134-145. *David Wade, “Introduction”, from Pattern in Islamic Art, pp. 7-13. *Valérie Gonzalez, “Abstraction, Kinetics and Metaphor: the ‘Geometries’ of the Alhambra”, from Beauty and Islam, pp. 69-93. *Oleg Grabar, “The Intermediary of Geometry”, from The Mediation of Ornament, pp. 119-154 (lots of pictures). 3 Week 9 The Arabesque and the Character of Islamic Vegetal Decoration • October 24 *Annemarie Schimmel, “The Arabesque and the Islamic View of the World”, from Ornament and Abstraction, pp. 31-35. *Terry Allen, “The Arabesque, the Bevelled Style, and the Mirage of an Early Islamic Art”, from Five Essays on Islamic Art, pp. 1-15. *Master Mahmud and Inlaid Metalwork in the 15th Century”, from Venice and the Islamic World, pp. 213-225, lots of pictures) *Maria Vittoria Fontana, “Islamic Influence on the Production of Ceramics in Venice and Padua”, from Venice and the Islamic World, pp. 280-293, ca. 8 pp. text) *Alois Riegl, “The Arabesque: an Introduction”, from Problems of Style: Foundations for a History of Ornament (Stilfragen), trans. Evelyn Kain, pp. 229-305. *Yasser Tabbaa, “ The Sunni Revival” and “The Girih Mode: Vegetal and Geometric Arabesque”, from The Transformation of Islamic Art During the Sunni Revival, pp. 11-24 and 73-103. Week 10 “A Rainbow More Colorful than the One in the Clouds” Muqarnas Ornament: Stereotomic Virtuosity and Heavenly Vision • October 31 PAPER PROPOSALS DUE *Mohammad al-Asad, “Applications of Geometry”, from The Mosque: History, Architectural Development & Regional Diversity, pp. 55-70, ca. 9 pp. text) *Yasser Tabbaa, Selections TBA, from “Muqarnas Vaulting and Ash’arī Occasionalism” and “Stone Muqarnas and Other Special Devices”, from The Transformation of Islamic Art During the Sunni Revival, pp. 103-162, lots of pictures). Week 11 Al-Khatt al-Jamil (Beautiful Writing): The Singular Role of Calligraphy in Islamic Ornament • November 7 *Wheeler M. Thackston, “The Role of Calligraphy”, from The Mosque: History, Architectural Development & Regional Diversity, pp. 42-53, ca. 3 pp. text). *Valérie Gonzalez, “The Signifying Aesthetic System of Inscriptions in Islamic Art”, from Beauty and Islam: Aesthetics in Islamic Art and Architecture, pp. 94-110. *Irene Bierman, “Initial Considerations” from Writing Signs: the Fatimid Public Text, pp. 1-27. Week 12 Ornament Over Mimesis: Islamic Art and Figural Representation • November 14 *Terry Allen, “Aniconism and Figural Representation in Islamic Art”, from Five Essays on Islamic Art, pp. 17-37. *Oleg Grabar, “An Aesthetic of Persian Painting”, from Mostly Miniatures: an Introduction to Persian Painting, pp. 124-146, lots of pictures. 4 *Priscilla Soucek, “The Life of the Prophet: Illustrated Versions”, from Context and Content of Visual Arts in the Islamic World, pp. 194-209 *Orhan Pamuk, excerpts from the novel My Name is Red: “I am a Tree” pp. 56-61, “I am Red” pp. 224-27 “I am a Horse” pp. 262-66. *Gregory Minissale, “Reading Anti-Illusionism” from Images of Thought: Visuality in Islamic India 1550-1750, 1-23. slamicrnamentegacy of atentiquity PART THREE: An Ornament for Our Times Week 13 Ornament and Modernism Toward a Contemporary Theory of Ornament • November 21 *James Trilling, “Ornament in the Age of Modernism”, from The Language of Ornament, pp. 185- 215. *Markus Bruderlin, “Introduction: Ornament and Abstraction”, from Ornament and Abstraction, pp. 17-27. *Phillipe Büttner, “In the Beginning was the Ornament—From the Arabesque to Modernism’s Abstract Line”, pp. 86-105, (ca. 3 pp. text, the rest pictures.) *E. H. Gombrich, “Issues of Taste” and “The Psychology of Styles”, from The Sense of Order, pp.
Recommended publications
  • Arabesken – Das Ornamentale Des Balletts Im Frühen 19

    Arabesken – Das Ornamentale Des Balletts Im Frühen 19

    2017-10-18 10-58-48 --- Projekt: transcript.anzeigen / Dokument: FAX ID 026f474678049510|(S. 1- 2) VOR2935.p 474678049518 Aus: Eike Wittrock Arabesken – Das Ornamentale des Balletts im frühen 19. Jahrhundert November 2017, 358 Seiten, kart., zahlr. Abb., 39,99 €, ISBN 978-3-8376-2935-4 Die Arabeske ist nicht nur eine der wichtigsten Positionen des klassischen Ballettvo- kabulars, mit ihr lässt sich auch das Ornamentale des Balletts im frühen 19. Jahrhun- dert beschreiben. Aus bisher größtenteils unveröffentlichten ikonografischen Quellen entwickelt Eike Wittrock eine Ästhetik des Balletts, die sowohl die Einzelfigur Arabes- ke wie auch die Gruppenformationen des corps de ballet erfasst. Lithografien, choreo- grafische Notationen, Abbildungen in Traktaten, Musterbücher und Buchverzierun- gen werden dabei als historiografische Medien von Tanz verstanden, die die fantasti- sche Bildlichkeit dieser Ballette in der Aufzeichnung weiterführen. Eike Wittrock ist Tanzwissenschaftler an der Freien Universität Berlin und forscht dort zur Tanzgeschichte. Außerdem arbeitet er als Dramaturg und Kurator im Bereich des zeitgenössischen Tanzes. Weitere Informationen und Bestellung unter: www.transcript-verlag.de/978-3-8376-2935-4 © 2017 transcript Verlag, Bielefeld 2017-10-18 10-58-48 --- Projekt: transcript.anzeigen / Dokument: FAX ID 026f474678049510|(S. 1- 2) VOR2935.p 474678049518 Inhalt 1. Einleitung | 7 Le Délire d’un peintre: Figur und Fantasie | 11 Zur Methode | 20 Der Begriff Arabeske | 36 Tanzhistorischer Forschungsstand | 53 2. Danseuses d’Herculanum | 65 3. Genealogie der Arabeske | 97 Drei frühe Auftritte der Arabeske | 104 Carlo Blasis’ Theorie der Arabeske | 108 Eingebildete Linien | 131 Of the figure that moves against the wind | 146 Finale Arabeske/Unzählige Variationen | 149 Im Cirque Olympique | 159 Arabesken in Giselle | 168 4.
  • Geometric Patterns and the Interpretation of Meaning: Two Monuments in Iran

    Geometric Patterns and the Interpretation of Meaning: Two Monuments in Iran

    BRIDGES Mathematical Connections in Art, Music, and Science Geometric Patterns and the Interpretation of Meaning: Two Monuments in Iran Carol Bier Research Associate, The Textile Museum 2320 S Street, NW Washington, DC 20008 [email protected] Abstract The Alhambra has often served in the West as the paradigm for understanding geometric pattern in Islamic art. Constructed in Spain in the 13th century as a highly defended palace, it is a relatively late manifestation of an Islamic fascination with geometric pattern. Numerous earlier Islamic buildings, from Spain to India, exhibit extensive geometric patterning, which substantiate a mathematical interest in the spatial dimension and its manifold potential for meaning. This paper examines two monuments on the Iranian plateau, dating from the 11 th century of our era, in which more than one hundred exterior surface areas have received patterns executed in cut brick. Considering context, architectural function, and accompanying inscriptions, it is proposed that the geometric patterns carry specific meanings in their group assemblage and combine to form a programmatic cycle of meanings. Perceived as ornamental by Western standards, geometric patterns in Islamic art are often construed as decorative without underlying meanings. The evidence presented in this paper suggests a literal association of geometric pattern with metaphysical concerns. In particular, the argument rests upon an interpretation of the passages excerpted from the Qur' an that inform the patterns of these two buildings, the visual and verbal expression mutually reinforcing one another. Specifically, the range and mUltiplicity of geometric patterns may be seen to represent the Arabic concept of mithal, usually translated as parable or similitude.
  • The Pseudo-Kufic Ornament and the Problem of Cross-Cultural Relationships Between Byzantium and Islam

    The Pseudo-Kufic Ornament and the Problem of Cross-Cultural Relationships Between Byzantium and Islam

    The pseudo-kufic ornament and the problem of cross-cultural relationships between Byzantium and Islam Silvia Pedone – Valentina Cantone The aim of the paper is to analyze pseudo-kufic ornament Dealing with a much debated topic, not only in recent in Byzantine art and the reception of the topic in Byzantine times, as that concerning the role and diffusion of orna- Studies. The pseudo-kufic ornamental motifs seem to ment within Byzantine art, one has often the impression occupy a middle position between the purely formal that virtually nothing new is possible to add so that you abstractness and freedom of arabesque and the purely have to repeat positions, if only involuntarily, by now well symbolic form of a semantic and referential mean, borrowed established. This notwithstanding, such a topic incessantly from an alien language, moreover. This double nature (that gives rise to questions and problems fueling the discussion is also a double negation) makes of pseudo-kufic decoration of historical and theoretical issues: a debate that has been a very interesting liminal object, an object of “transition”, going on for longer than two centuries. This situation is as it were, at the crossroad of different domains. Starting certainly due to a combination of reasons, but ones hav- from an assessment of the theoretical questions raised by ing a close connection with the history of the art-historical the aesthetic peculiarities of this kind of ornament, we discipline itself. In the present paper our aim is to focus on consider, from this specific point of view, the problem of a very specific kind of ornament, the so-called pseudo-kufic the cross-cultural impact of Islamic and islamicizing formal inscriptions that rise interesting pivotal questions – hither- repertory on Byzantine ornament, focusing in particular on to not so much explored – about the “interference” between a hitherto unpublished illuminated manuscript dated to the a formalistic approach and a functionalistic stance, with its 10th century and held by the Marciana Library in Venice.
  • Architectural Elements in Islamic Ornamentation: New Vision in Contemporary Islamic Art

    Architectural Elements in Islamic Ornamentation: New Vision in Contemporary Islamic Art

    Arts and Design Studies www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-6061 (Paper) ISSN 2225-059X (Online) Vol.21, 2014 Architectural Elements in Islamic Ornamentation: New Vision in Contemporary Islamic Art Jeanan Shafiq Interior Design Dpt., Applied Sciences Private University, P.O. Box 166, Amman 11931 Jordan. * E-mail of the corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract Throughout history, Islamic Ornamentation was the most characteristic to identify Islamic architecture. It used in mosques and other Islamic buildings. Many studies were about the formation of Islamic art from pre-existing traditional elements and about the nature of the power which wrought all those various elements into a unique synthesis. Nobody will deny the unity of Islamic art, despite the differences of time and place. It’s far too evident, whether one contemplates the mosque of Cordoba, the great schools of Samarkand or Al- Mustansiriya. It’s like the same light shone forth from all these works of art. Islam does not prescribe any particular forms of art. It merely restricts the field of expression. Ideology of Islam depends on the fixed and variable principles. Fixed indicate to the main principles of Islam that could not be changed in place and time including the oneness of God, while the variable depends on human vision in different places through time. It's called the intellectual vision inherited in Islamic art. Islamic Ornamentation today is repeating the same forms, by which, it turns to a traditional heritage art. From this specific point the research problem started. Are we able to find different style of ornament that refers to Islamic Art? Islamic ideology in its original meaning is a faculty of timeless realities.
  • Exploration of Arabesque As an Element of Decoration in Islamic Heritage Buildings: the Case of Indian and Persian Architecture

    Exploration of Arabesque As an Element of Decoration in Islamic Heritage Buildings: the Case of Indian and Persian Architecture

    Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology ISSN No : 1006-7930 Exploration of Arabesque as an Element of Decoration in Islamic Heritage Buildings: The Case of Indian and Persian Architecture Mohammad Arif Kamal Architecture Section Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India Saima Gulzar School of Architecture and Planning University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan Sadia Farooq Dept. of Family and Consumer Sciences University of Home Economics, Lahore, Pakistan Abstract - The decoration is a vital element in Islamic art and architecture. The Muslim designers finished various art, artifacts, religious objects, and buildings with many types of ornamentation such as geometry, epigraphy, calligraphy, arabesque, and sometimes animal figures. Among them, the most universal motif in ornamentation which was extensively used is the arabesque. The arabesque is an abstract and rhythmic vegetal ornamentation pattern in Islamic decoration. It is found in a wide variety of media such as book art, stucco, stonework, ceramics, tiles, metalwork, textiles, carpets, etc.. The paper discusses the fact that arabesque is a unique, universal, and vital element of ornamentation within the framework of Islamic Architecture. In this paper, the etymological roots of the term ‘Arabesque’, its evolution and development have been explored. The general characteristics as well as different modes of arabesque are discussed. This paper also analyses the presentation of arabesque with specific reference to Indian and Persian Islamic heritage buildings. Keywords – Arabesque, Islamic Architecture, Decoration, Heritage, India, Iran I. INTRODUCTION The term ‘Arabesque’ is an obsolete European form of rebesk (or rebesco), not an Arabic word dating perhaps from the 15th or 16th century when Renaissance artists used Islamic Designs for book ornament and decorative bookbinding [1].
  • Islamic Ornament

    Islamic Ornament

    Islamic Ornament ARH 394/MDV 392M/MES 386 fridays 10-1 Stephennie Mulder Soyletoveywebl;zye.eycoxcme/s.we.we Instructor email: [email protected] Classroom Location: ART 3.432 Office: DFA 2.516 Office Hours: Mondays & Wednesdays 9-11 and by appointment Islamic art is famous for its tradition of ornamented surfaces, while Western art has often used ornament primarily to highlight or enhance the impact of an image. This course is a comparative study of the role of ornament, which takes as its founding premise that both Islamic and European art emerged from the same Late Antique visual milieu: in which abstract, geometric, and vegetal ornament played a key, (though often neglected) role. The study of ornament has a long and important history in art and design, but with the advent of modernism, ornament was deemed ethically suspect and inimical to art’s higher purposes. Nevertheless, in the past few decades, under the aegis of postmodern theory, ornament has assumed a renewed significance. We will explore multiple scholars’ perspectives on ornament: its practical function and creation, its ability to transform surfaces and thereby change their reception and meaning, and its role as a semiotic device and broader social function as a marker of class, faith, or exoticism. An important proposal we will explore is the idea that ornament is not mere “decoration,” but rather has a rich functional and symbolic role to play in the human response to and understanding of art. With this role in mind, a key skill students will acquire in this course is the ability to make a visual analysis of a work of art whose primary feature is its ornament.
  • Caroline Arscott, Morris Carpets, RIHA Journal 0089

    Caroline Arscott, Morris Carpets, RIHA Journal 0089

    RIHA Journal 0089 | 27 March 2014 | Special Issue "When Art History Meets Design History" Morris Carpets Caroline Arscott Editing and peer review managed by: Anne Puetz, The Courtauld Institute of Art, London and Glenn Adamson, Museum of Arts and Design (MAD), New York City Reviewers: Martina Droth, Jules Lubbock Abstract William Morris's carpet designs have been discussed in terms of design scheme, historical sources, naturalism and abstraction. This essay revisits some of these aspects in order to consider Morris's intimations of action. Action was associated by Morris with the pictorial and considered by him to be one of the great resources of oriental carpet design. The article considers the specific historical carpets with which Morris was familiar and discusses the terms used by Morris in assessing the intellectual and aesthetic value of historical carpets. It discusses the way that the knot in the fabric of the carpet might have been understood by Morris as analogous to knots and interlacements in the design. It goes on to propose that the knot was also understood in relation to linkages, contests, cultural exchange and forms of interconnection in human history. There is a discussion of common ground between Morris's discussion of ornament (in terms of cultural transmission) and ideas set out by Alois Riegl. The carpet Clouds, made by Morris & Co. in 1885 for Clouds, East Knoyle, Wiltshire is the central example. * * * * * * * [1] In this article I will argue that the ornamental zone of the carpet represented for Morris something more than an area of geometrical pattern and stylisation. The discussion of his ornament has generally focused on the overall schema adopted, his historical sources and his stylisation of natural form.
  • Curriculum Vitae: Oleg Grabar

    Curriculum Vitae: Oleg Grabar

    CURRICULUM VITAE: OLEG GRABAR Date of Birth: November 3, 1929, Strasbourg, France Secondary Education: Lycées Claude Bernard and Louis-le-Grand, Paris Higher Education: Certificat de licence, Ancient History, University of Paris (1948) B.A. (magna cum laude), Harvard University, Medieval History (1950) Certificats de licence, Medieval History and Modern History, University of Paris (1950) M.A. (1953) and Ph.D. (1955), Princeton University, Oriental Languages and Literatures and History of Art Fellow, 1953-54, American School of Oriental Research, Jerusalem, Jordan PROFESSIONAL HISTORY: Academic 1954-69 University of Michigan: 1954-55 Instructor; 1955-59 Assistant Professor of Near Eastern Art and Near Eastern Studies; 1959-64 Associate Professor; 1964-69 Professor; 1966-67 Acting Chairman, Department of the History of Art. 1969-90 Harvard University: 1969-1980 Professor of Fine Arts; 1973-76 Head Tutor, Department of Fine Arts; 1975-76 Acting Co-Master of North House; 1977-82 Chairman, Department of Fine Arts; 1980-90 Aga Khan Professor of Islamic Art and Architecture; Professor Emeritus since 1990. 1990- Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton: Professor, School of Historical Studies. (1990-1998); Professor Emeritus (1998-). Other 1957-70 Near Eastern Editor, Ars Orientalis 1958-69 Honorary Curator of Near Eastern Art, Freer Gallery of Art, Smithsonian Institute 1960-61 Director, American School of Oriental Research, Jerusalem, Jordan 1964-69 Secretary, American Research Institute in Turkey 2 1964-72 Director, Excavations at Qasr al-Hayr
  • Travels in Andalucia

    Travels in Andalucia

    Collecting Islam: Travels In Andalucia This talk looks at the unique Islamic style of architecture developed by the Moorish rulers of Spain during their rule of the Iberian Peninsula from the 8th to 15th centuries. 1. The Court of the Lions, Alhambra; Charles Clifford (1821 – 1863); Albumen print photograph; ca. 1855 Museum number: 47:790 Charles Clifford was one of the finest photographers of 19th century Spain, and he spent most of his career there. Having settled in Madrid in the 1850s, he became court photographer for Queen Isabella II, and accompanied her on a number of royal tours within Spain. Clifford was very effective at capturing architectural subjects through his technical mastery of the large- format camera. 2. Plans, Elevations, Sections and Details from the Alhambra; Owen Jones and Jules Goury; volume; 1845 Museum number: NAL; 110.P.36 This volume was part one in a series of two, and constituted the main output of Jones and Goury’s observational work in Andalucia. The studies contained within this volume include detailed drawings of ornament, translations of all Arabic inscriptions and an in-depth historical account of the Moorish kings of Granada. To ensure perfect accuracy in the ornament details, plaster impressions were taken of every element of ornament of the Alhambra. Some of these casts were bought by the South Kensington Museum (precursor to the V&A) for students of Oriental art. Jones worked hard to establish a good standard of chromolithographic printing to do justice to the striking Islamic decorative schemes, and in fact as a result was a major force in pushing forward colour printing in England at the time.
  • Domestic Terror and Poe's Arabesque Interior

    Domestic Terror and Poe's Arabesque Interior

    Domestic Terror and Poe’s Arabesque Interior Jacob Rama Berman University of California, Santa Barbara of a May Burton’s Gentleman’s TMagazine the reader alights on a curious essay about the “philosophy” of interior design written by the editor, Edgar Allan Poe. Beginning with a quote from Hegel that affirms philosophy as “utterly useless” and therefore the “sublimest of all pursuits,” Poe proceeds to argue for a philosophical approach to internal decoration that implicitly establishes furniture as a potential source of the sublime (“Furniture” ). Poe’s subsequent claim, though, is that this philosophy of furniture is “nevertheless more imper- fectly understood by Americans than by any civilized nation on earth,” to which he adds that in terms of internal decoration “the English are supreme” and “the Yankees alone are preposterous” (). Considering the “Yankee” composition of Poe’s own audience, it is not surprising that the critical response to “e Philosophy of Furniture” stresses its “inten- tionally humorous tone” (e Edgar Allen Poe Society of Baltimore). What this dominant approach ignores, though, is Poe’s serious investment in modeling cultivated taste for an American audience whose own “primitive” taste precludes domestic access to the sublime.¹ To this end, Poe, posturing Poe comments in “e Philosophy of Furniture” that American conceptions of taste are corrupted because they follow from the “primitive folly” of confusing ESC . (March ): – Berman.indd 128 4/13/2007, 9:20 AM as cultural critic, concludes the article with an invitation to his readers to watch as he sketches a “small and not ostentatious chamber with whose decorations no fault can be found” ().
  • Riegl and Darwin: Evolutionary Models of Art and Life Harriet Kate Sophie Mcatee Bsc, Barts (Hons)

    Riegl and Darwin: Evolutionary Models of Art and Life Harriet Kate Sophie Mcatee Bsc, Barts (Hons)

    Riegl and Darwin: Evolutionary Models of Art and Life Harriet Kate Sophie McAtee BSc, BArts (Hons) A thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2014 School of Communications and Arts Harriet McAtee Abstract Austrian art historian Alois Riegl (1858-1905), a core member of the first Vienna School of Art History that flourished during the late-nineteenth century, is widely acknowledged as one of the key figures of art history leading into the twentieth century, and remembered for his then-radical treatises that used formal analysis to narrate a history of the evolution of artistic forms. The uniqueness of Riegl’s project, in which he developed a model that emphasised both the instances of continuity and innovation in the history of art, stands alone amongst his contemporaries, and has kinship with the evolutionary theories proposed by Charles Darwin (1809-1882). Riegl was preoccupied with delineating the uninterrupted history of art’s evolution, which accounted not only for changes in form and style, but also the function and role of art in society. However, despite intriguing analogies between Darwin’s theory of evolution by natural selection and Riegl’s model for the continuous evolution of art, the relationship between Riegl and Darwin has remained largely unexplored. Over the past two decades, contemporary interest in Riegl has surged, as art historians uncover his ongoing relevance to questions which preoccupy their current investigations. However, interaction with Riegl has largely been delineated by a framework of Hegelian aesthetics and art history, which as this thesis will demonstrate, does not appropriately account for the uniqueness of Vienna’s intellectual context, in which Darwinism was hugely popular.
  • Historiesof Ornament

    Historiesof Ornament

    HISTORIES of ORNAMENT FROM GLOBAL TO LOCAL Edited by GÜLRU NECIPOĞLU and ALINA PAYNE With contributions by María Judith Feliciano Alina Payne Michele Bacci Finbarr Barry Flood Antoine Picon Anna Contadini Jonathan Hay David Pullins Thomas B. F. Cummins Christopher P. Heuer Jennifer L. Roberts Chanchal Dadlani Rémi Labrusse David J. Roxburgh Daniela del Pesco Gülru Necipoğlu Hashim Sarkis Vittoria Di Palma Marco Rosario Nobile Robin Schuldenfrei PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS Anne Dunlop Oya Pancaroğlu Avinoam Shalem Princeton and Oxford Marzia Faietti Spyros Papapetros and Gerhard Wolf Copyright © 2016 by Princeton University Press Published by Princeton University Press, 41 William Street, Princeton, New Jersey 08540 In the United Kingdom: Princeton University Press, 6 Oxford Street, Woodstock, Oxfordshire OX20 1TW press.princeton.edu {~?~Jacket/cover art credit here, if needed} All Rights Reserved Library of Congress CataLoging-in-PubLiCation Data Histories of Ornament : From Global to Local / Edited by Gulru Necipoglu and Alina Payne ; With contributions by Michele Bacci, Anna Contadini, Thomas B.F. Cummins, Chanchal Dadlani, Daniela del Pesco, Vittoria Di Palma, Anne Dunlop, Marzia Faietti, Maria Judith Feliciano, Finbarr Barry Flood, Jonathan Hay, Christopher P. Heuer, Remi Labrusse, Gulru Necipoglu, Marco Rosario Nobile, Spyros Papapetros, Oya Pancaroglu, Alina Payne, Antoine Picon, David Pullins, Jennifer L. Roberts, David J. Roxburgh, Avinoam Shalem, Hashim Sarkis, Robin Schuldenfrei, and Gerhard Wolf. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-691-16728-2 (hardcover : alk. paper) 1. Decoration and ornament, Architectural. I. Necipoglu, Gulru, editor. II. Payne, Alina Alexandra, editor. NA3310.H57 2016 729.09—dc23 2015022263 British Library Cataloging- in- Publication Data is available This book has been composed in Vesper Pro Light and Myriad Pro Printed on acid- free paper.