No. 26, November 1986

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

No. 26, November 1986 THE COLEDPTERIST'S N·EWSLET:TER: .... ;; ·'· . ' . ~ . ·.· ... _: .- ..::, ·· .. _· : ..~ November; 19~6 .. Hunber 26 . ':.. \ . .. _:_ .· ·.·; .· .. ~ •. ; :With. ;the: _fin,al "Newsletter" .for the year it is. on~e ' . ~ aga_i11·ny, duty. to remind readers. that .the suba~ript.i~n. • • . • • • • • • • • • : • t • • .._ :. • • ,_.~ ; ~ -, . ..... .· . .' ~ . for 1987 .i.s:. due •. The good news is that .there y~ll b.e ~-o . ' . ~: incr~a~e ... i.n _the subseripti,on _ra:te. '· : .\ . _:J>l,ea.~e .. -'~~kf) o~eques_ payable.· to ,"Co~eopterist_' s . ~ .. r{ew.f:!l,et.tf)r" . aQd. send to Peter Hodge, ~ I!arvard Road . ' . .1 Ri-ngrner,: Lewes, . "Ea,st Suss_ex~ BN$ 5HJ as· e~oon a_s . .... : .. eonv:~nient~.Y possible. Thanking yo~ for your suppor:t . ~ ' ,.. Jonl;lthan Go.oter. ,._ ,~ •, .' ._ .. ; :.-· -·::· -· .' _'_ ·_ BREEDING ANTHRtBUS RESINOSUS (SCOP.}. :. ;.I :h~v~.:-~~und this. very rare weeyil in· nol"th Oxfordslii"·r~; ,·, .:• . ~ . ~ . ... ~. at.-J;~r~e fiites (}\lite. close to Banbury where L live. T~e · · beetle- waf:! not. record~d on th~ .old Viot~ria c~unty Hi:dt~;y .. · .: . - . .. ~ . ~ . .. ' :- list~ofGColeopte~a for Oxfordshire, but David Sheppard . .. ' . .. found it a few years ago hibernating in an old hornet's 1;1es·t in·_ _.f/y_ohwood. For~ st. I: found the beetle in Aprfl ~1984' :-;,, ·.; . ·- . _under ol~.as~-bark and John Parry kindly gave me so~ details of its life history. Upon examining a large ash log with plenty of Daldinia fungus on it, I dis~overed about 15 adult beetles and decided to have a go breeding thee. 2 I collected pieces of bark with Daldinia on, (the reddish brown fresh fungus is best) and placed these in an aquarium covered with metal gauze together with about 10 of the adults. The beetles were seen to be mating during May and before long I found the typioal "C"-shaped weevil. larvae inside the fungus. Plenty of fungus is needed as the adults eat it as well. There never seemed to be nore than-one larva in a piece of fungus, perhaps they are carniverous. The. iarvae grow q.uickly: and are ready. to pupate at the end of June or early Jtily. l: discovered 'that· they would not pupate in the bark, bu~ ~hnd~red a~ourid lodking iost~ ~he larvae eat their way out of -the fungu's 'through the bark- and seek wood in which· to tunnel ·and pupate. tt· is· essential, .I ~ .. ·. found, to have a 'pfece of ·ash log' on. whi.ch :to place 'the bark~. this needs to be only a few inches i~·dia~eter,· but with-this underneatb ·'the ·bark· tlie larvae ·will quite :h~ppi'ly bore ·in:to· · · it and pupate, "enierging through a second hole in two or three weeks. My first adults emerged on July 25th. This weevil is rare and hard to catch as it has the habit of dropping to the-·ground and -playing ..dead for.. e. .. l~ng_ ·: time. ·It_oay.be often ~asier for Coleopterists to find fungus during M:ay·and June with the larvae in and breed the adults· . out. ~he above ri6t~~ ~iil p~~haps be of use~ It is essential· to keep the fungus dampened; damp peat at· the bottom of the· . container will help to c<:m·serve noisture • . '· .. .. ~ i . •·t • :' - -. David copestake, 22 Meadow Way, ... r ,.• Banbury·, Oxfords hire, · OX16 9SR ' .. ' •. I I. 3 AN IDEAL COUNTY LIST ? .A county list of. Col.eoptera is essen~ially a sumnary .of .all ·the ,data relating to the beetles of a given county. An enormous anount of information is required to write such a catalogue, both i~ terns of species data and background inf_orqation. Such information can be divide~ into·a series of subj e_c_t headings and I have attenpted to briefly outline e~ch one in turn. I nust ~tress that ~~ese are personal views a~d are not ceant to debase the etforts of those who have produced such valuable county _lists in the _past. 1. Area of Study. Descr~b~ the area and define the boutid~ries (e~g. v.c., Adcinistrative County) and present a :series of oa~s showing relevant features. These would include: the najor towns or cities, as a guide to foreigners, the major­ collecting areas, perhaps as part of a topographical,: geological or land-use nap,. other Bajor landscape featu~es~ TJ:lere is no shane in producing a list froo less than a··· county, so long as it.is honest~y presented as such. Ju~t look at the 126 pages of Donisthorpe's "A Prelininary List of the Coleoptera of Windsor Forest" (1939) -and that·was· not even definitive! 2. ·Sources of Infornation. · There are hundreds of irolunes of published books and journals that would need to be searched as part of the construction of a conprehensive list. Fe~ people, otitside Lond~~' ~ave· access to all of then. A list of those searched should be :p~esented, togeth~r •ith ihe date-span of those consulted (eg EntoGologist 1900-1969; Ent·omologi~t 's Monthly Magazine·· 1930 to date). Any nantis~ript: so~rc~s shduld also be· ·stated, together with their date-~pan and lricati~n (e.g. T.J.Bold diaries 1843-1868 Natural History Society of Northunberland, Hancock r.1useun, Newcastle-u:pon-Tyne). 4 3. Nonenolature. State which oheok-list is being used and any up-dates whioh have b'een incorporated. (E.g. IGoet & Hincks (2nd edition) 1977 and ·aiilElend.tJents as publ i she·d in "Ant'enna" vel unes 1-9, 1977~8:5). 4. Status. There are tuo cooponerits of status: abundance and distribution. A species nay be widespread in the county, but only present in snall numbers throughout. AlternativelY, a species nay be found in only a very restricted area, but be present there in very large nunbers. The terninology used should be defined. The following is sugf,ested: Resident -. species established as breeding colonies (e. g. forner resident, current resident, tenporary resident. resident re-inforced. by oigrllt.ion). Migrant - species which nay breed here, but are dependant on regular replacenent fro3 elsewhere. V.agrant - species caught in the wild but which only usually occur in sone distant place and is not known to be nigratory. Introduction - species known to have been brought into the area by nan. Sinilarly the following definitions are suggested for terns of distribution: Ubiquitous - occurs throughout the county in all situations. Widespread - occurs throughout the county in a variety of habitats~ Local - occurs patchily, probably restricted by habitat requirecents. The following definitions are suggested for.teros of abundance: Abundant - 101+ records; Frequent - 51-190 records; Occasional - 21-50 records; Scarce - 11-20 records; Rare less than 10 records. The latter two, since 1970. .,.. 5 The tern "comJon" should be avoided. It is a tern of dispersion, not of abundance. A species night be com~<Jn to wo~dland, but nay not ~e particularly abundant ther~. Phras~s such as 11 looally ·conLon 11 are neaningless and should be expressed core accurately as "locally abundant" or cocoon to habitat x. 5. History. .. The history of beetle coll.ecting in the county should be out- lined together with notes about extant collections and nanu­ scripts. A brief biography of the najor colleotnrs nr at least their collecting aotivitie~ in the county should be . given. Always try to give the full na~e and years of birth and death for each person tJentioned (e.g. Thooas John Bold., (1816-1874)). 6.Localities. The best~worked localities should be described, especially if they have changec'or no longer exist. All the· localities· oentioned in the text sho~ld be listed as a gazeteer together with grid references, vice-counties and the initials of the · collectors who·worked the area. 7. Coverage~ A oap showing.the geographical spread·of records, and pref~rab_lY.. ,th~ _intensity of recording is essential. This not only shows how thorough_the recording has been, but highlights those areas still awaiting investigation. : : 8. Acknowledgeoents. Everyone who has personally helped the author should be individually acknowledged, as should all institutions e.g~ libraries, nuseuns etc·whose resources have been Cf'lnsulted. !). Cont.ents. A contents page at the beginning of the work is essential. 6 10. Index. A species index should be included. We have not all nenorised the sequence in the Check-List. The following inforoation is requ~red for each species recorded froo the county. History - The date and details of its first capture in the co·unty and references to all published records for the coun~y, with sone indication of the naoe by which it was recorded if that differs froo the naoe used in the list. It is not necessary to include all unpublished records - hopefully there will be.too oany of then- but perhaps all the recorU.s of the rarer species could be included - or perhaps not ? Local Status - The published and uhpublished records should be sur~arised and presented on a distribution nap, with sooe differentiation b~tween recent and historical records . ' ( e.g. 3 date classes, pre-1900; 1900-:1950; 1951-date). Any changes in distribution should be given together with any changes in this over tine. National Status- A brief cor_ment .about "the. national status helps to put the local status in perspe~tive. -' . Biology - Sone indication of its biology would be useful, or alternatively, .sone reference to such infornation. Variation. -.Any regionai variation in coloration, norphology, life-cycle or phenology should be noted. The final ~ounty list will probably be surprisingly large if all this inforoation is in6luded. However, the entries for soue species will be very brief and for others so large that severe editing v.rill be necessary.
Recommended publications
  • Topic Paper Chilterns Beechwoods
    . O O o . 0 O . 0 . O Shoping growth in Docorum Appendices for Topic Paper for the Chilterns Beechwoods SAC A summary/overview of available evidence BOROUGH Dacorum Local Plan (2020-2038) Emerging Strategy for Growth COUNCIL November 2020 Appendices Natural England reports 5 Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation 6 Appendix 1: Citation for Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation (SAC) 7 Appendix 2: Chilterns Beechwoods SAC Features Matrix 9 Appendix 3: European Site Conservation Objectives for Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation Site Code: UK0012724 11 Appendix 4: Site Improvement Plan for Chilterns Beechwoods SAC, 2015 13 Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI 27 Appendix 5: Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI citation 28 Appendix 6: Condition summary from Natural England’s website for Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI 31 Appendix 7: Condition Assessment from Natural England’s website for Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI 33 Appendix 8: Operations likely to damage the special interest features at Ashridge Commons and Woods, SSSI, Hertfordshire/Buckinghamshire 38 Appendix 9: Views About Management: A statement of English Nature’s views about the management of Ashridge Commons and Woods Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), 2003 40 Tring Woodlands SSSI 44 Appendix 10: Tring Woodlands SSSI citation 45 Appendix 11: Condition summary from Natural England’s website for Tring Woodlands SSSI 48 Appendix 12: Condition Assessment from Natural England’s website for Tring Woodlands SSSI 51 Appendix 13: Operations likely to damage the special interest features at Tring Woodlands SSSI 53 Appendix 14: Views About Management: A statement of English Nature’s views about the management of Tring Woodlands Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Coleoptera of New Brunswick, Canada
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 573: 387–512 (2016)Checklist of the Coleoptera of New Brunswick, Canada 387 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.573.8022 CHECKLIST http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Checklist of the Coleoptera of New Brunswick, Canada Reginald P. Webster1 1 24 Mill Stream Drive, Charters Settlement, NB, Canada E3C 1X1 Corresponding author: Reginald P. Webster ([email protected]) Academic editor: P. Bouchard | Received 3 February 2016 | Accepted 29 February 2016 | Published 24 March 2016 http://zoobank.org/34473062-17C2-4122-8109-3F4D47BB5699 Citation: Webster RP (2016) Checklist of the Coleoptera of New Brunswick, Canada. In: Webster RP, Bouchard P, Klimaszewski J (Eds) The Coleoptera of New Brunswick and Canada: providing baseline biodiversity and natural history data. ZooKeys 573: 387–512. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.573.8022 Abstract All 3,062 species of Coleoptera from 92 families known to occur in New Brunswick, Canada, are re- corded, along with their author(s) and year of publication using the most recent classification framework. Adventive and Holarctic species are indicated. There are 366 adventive species in the province, 12.0% of the total fauna. Keywords Checklist, Coleoptera, New Brunswick, Canada Introduction The first checklist of the beetles of Canada by Bousquet (1991) listed 1,365 species from the province of New Brunswick, Canada. Since that publication, many species have been added to the faunal list of the province, primarily from increased collection efforts and
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Handsome Fungus Beetles (Coleoptera: Endomychidae)
    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 40 Numbers 3 & 4 - Fall/Winter 2007 Numbers 3 & Article 9 4 - Fall/Winter 2007 October 2007 An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Handsome Fungus Beetles (Coleoptera: Endomychidae) Michele B. Price University of Wisconsin Daniel K. Young University of Wisconsin Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Price, Michele B. and Young, Daniel K. 2007. "An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Handsome Fungus Beetles (Coleoptera: Endomychidae)," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 40 (2) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol40/iss2/9 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Price and Young: An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Handsome Fungus Beetles (Cole 2007 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST 177 AN Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Handsome Fungus Beetles (Coleoptera: Endomychidae) Michele B. Price1 and Daniel K. Young1 ABSTRACT The first comprehensive survey of Wisconsin Endomychidae was initiated in 1998. Throughout Wisconsin sampling sites were selected based on habitat type and sampling history. Wisconsin endomychids were hand collected from fungi and under tree bark; successful trapping methods included cantharidin- baited pitfall traps, flight intercept traps, and Lindgren funnel traps. Examina- tion of literature records, museum and private collections, and field research yielded 10 species, three of which are new state records. Two dubious records, Epipocus unicolor Horn and Stenotarsus hispidus (Herbst), could not be con- firmed.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Beetles
    Ireland Red List No. 1 Water beetles Ireland Red List No. 1: Water beetles G.N. Foster1, B.H. Nelson2 & Á. O Connor3 1 3 Eglinton Terrace, Ayr KA7 1JJ 2 Department of Natural Sciences, National Museums Northern Ireland 3 National Parks & Wildlife Service, Department of Environment, Heritage & Local Government Citation: Foster, G. N., Nelson, B. H. & O Connor, Á. (2009) Ireland Red List No. 1 – Water beetles. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland. Cover images from top: Dryops similaris (© Roy Anderson); Gyrinus urinator, Hygrotus decoratus, Berosus signaticollis & Platambus maculatus (all © Jonty Denton) Ireland Red List Series Editors: N. Kingston & F. Marnell © National Parks and Wildlife Service 2009 ISSN 2009‐2016 Red list of Irish Water beetles 2009 ____________________________ CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................................................... 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...................................................................................................................................... 2 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................................ 3 NOMENCLATURE AND THE IRISH CHECKLIST................................................................................................ 3 COVERAGE .......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera)
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Insecta Mundi Florida March 2002 An annotated checklist of Wisconsin Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera) Nadine A. Kriska University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI Daniel K. Young University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi Part of the Entomology Commons Kriska, Nadine A. and Young, Daniel K., "An annotated checklist of Wisconsin Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera)" (2002). Insecta Mundi. 537. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi/537 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Florida at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Insecta Mundi by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. INSECTA MUNDI, Vol. 16, No. 1-3, March-September, 2002 3 1 An annotated checklist of Wisconsin Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera) Nadine L. Kriska and Daniel K. Young Department of Entomology 445 Russell Labs University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison, WI 53706 Abstract. A survey of Wisconsin Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera) conducted from literature searches, collection inventories, and three years of field work (1997-1999), yielded 177 species representing nine families, two of which, Ochodaeidae and Ceratocanthidae, represent new state family records. Fifty-six species (32% of the Wisconsin fauna) represent new state species records, having not previously been recorded from the state. Literature and collection distributional records suggest the potential for at least 33 additional species to occur in Wisconsin. Introduction however, most of Wisconsin's scarabaeoid species diversity, life histories, and distributions were vir- The superfamily Scarabaeoidea is a large, di- tually unknown.
    [Show full text]
  • Artificial Laboratory Breeding of Xylophagous Insect Larvae and Its Application in Cytogenetic Studies 2)
    Eos, t. LXII, págs. 7-22 (1986). Artificial laboratory breeding of xylophagous insect larvae and its application in cytogenetic studies 2) BY J. R. BARAGAÑO, A. NOTARIO y M. G. DE VIEDMA. INTRODUCTION HAYDAK, in 1936, managed to rear Oryzaephilus surinantensis (L.) in the la- boratory using an artificial diet. Many researchers have followed in his footsteps, so that since then, approximately 260 species of Coleoptera have been raised on nonnatural diets. Among these species there are 121 which are eminently xylophagous. They belong to seven families (Buprestidae, Elateridae, Bostrychiclae, Lyctidae, Myc- teridae, Cerambyciclae and Curculionidae). Their importance, from the economic point of view, varies widely : some of them attack living trees making them a pest ; others feed on dead or decaying wood so that they may be considered harmless or even beneficial (for example in the decomposition of tree stumps in forests) ; finally, a few cause damage to seasoned timber. Therefore, specialists in artificial breeding have been motivated by different objectives, and so have chosen the insect or insects in each case which were most suitable for obtaining specific desired results. It is clear that in the majority of cases the choice was not made at random. Generally, the insect studied was either recently established as a pest or well documented as such. •With these laboratory breeding experiments it is possible on the one hand to draw conclusions about the insects' nutritive requirements, parasitism, ethology etc ; and on the other to obtain enough specimens to try out different phytosanitary treatments with them. Both of these achievements are applicable to effectiye control of the insect problem.
    [Show full text]
  • (Fungi, Entomophthoromycota) Attacking Coleoptera with a Key for Their Identification
    Entomophthorales (Fungi, Entomophthoromycota) attacking Coleoptera with a key for their identification Autor(en): Keller, Siegfried Objekttyp: Article Zeitschrift: Mitteilungen der Schweizerischen Entomologischen Gesellschaft = Bulletin de la Société Entomologique Suisse = Journal of the Swiss Entomological Society Band (Jahr): 86 (2013) Heft 3-4 PDF erstellt am: 05.10.2021 Persistenter Link: http://doi.org/10.5169/seals-403074 Nutzungsbedingungen Die ETH-Bibliothek ist Anbieterin der digitalisierten Zeitschriften. Sie besitzt keine Urheberrechte an den Inhalten der Zeitschriften. Die Rechte liegen in der Regel bei den Herausgebern. Die auf der Plattform e-periodica veröffentlichten Dokumente stehen für nicht-kommerzielle Zwecke in Lehre und Forschung sowie für die private Nutzung frei zur Verfügung. Einzelne Dateien oder Ausdrucke aus diesem Angebot können zusammen mit diesen Nutzungsbedingungen und den korrekten Herkunftsbezeichnungen weitergegeben werden. Das Veröffentlichen von Bildern in Print- und Online-Publikationen ist nur mit vorheriger Genehmigung der Rechteinhaber erlaubt. Die systematische Speicherung von Teilen des elektronischen Angebots auf anderen Servern bedarf ebenfalls des schriftlichen Einverständnisses der Rechteinhaber. Haftungsausschluss Alle Angaben erfolgen ohne Gewähr für Vollständigkeit oder Richtigkeit. Es wird keine Haftung übernommen für Schäden durch die Verwendung von Informationen aus diesem Online-Angebot oder durch das Fehlen von Informationen. Dies gilt auch für Inhalte Dritter, die über dieses Angebot zugänglich sind. Ein Dienst der ETH-Bibliothek ETH Zürich, Rämistrasse 101, 8092 Zürich, Schweiz, www.library.ethz.ch http://www.e-periodica.ch MITTEILUNGEN DER SCHWEIZERISCHEN ENTOMOLOGISCHEN GESELLSCHAFT BULLETIN DE LA SOCIÉTÉ ENTOMOLOGIQUE SUISSE 86: 261-279.2013 Entomophthorales (Fungi, Entomophthoromycota) attacking Coleoptera with a key for their identification Siegfried Keller Rheinweg 14, CH-8264 Eschenz; [email protected] A key to 30 species of entomophthoralean fungi is provided.
    [Show full text]
  • Rote Liste Ka Fer Band 2 Landesnaturschutzgesetz
    Ministerium für Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und ländliche Räume des Landes Schleswig-Holstein Die Käfer Schleswig-Holsteins Rote Liste Band 2 Herausgeber: Ministerium für Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und ländliche Räume des Landes Schleswig-Holstein (MLUR) Erarbeitung durch: Landesamt für Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und ländliche Räume des Landes Schleswig-Holstein Hamburger Chaussee 25 24220 Flintbek Tel.: 0 43 47 / 704-0 www.llur.schleswig-holstein.de Ansprechpartner: Arne Drews (Tel. 0 43 47 / 704-360) Autoren: Stephan Gürlich Roland Suikat Wolfgang Ziegler Titelfoto: Macroplea mutica (RL 1), Langklauen-Rohrblattkäfer, 7 mm, Familie Blattkäfer, Unterfamilie Schilfkäfer galt bereits als ausgestorben. Die Art konnte aber in neuerer Zeit in den Seegraswiesen der Orther Reede auf Fehmarn wieder nachgewiesen werden. Die Käferart vollzieht ihren gesamten Lebenszyklus vollständig submers und gehört gleichzeitig zu den ganz wenigen Insektenarten, die im Salzwasser leben können. Dieses einzige an der schleswig-hol- steinischen Ostseeküste bekannte Vorkommen ist in den dortigen Flachwasserzonen durch Wassersport gefährdet. (Foto: R. Suikat) Herstellung: Pirwitz Druck & Design, Kronshagen Dezember 2011 ISBN: 978-3-937937-54-0 Schriftenreihe: LLUR SH – Natur - RL 23 Band 2 von 3 Diese Broschüre wurde auf Recyclingpapier hergestellt. Diese Druckschrift wird im Rahmen der Öffentlichkeitsarbeit der schleswig- holsteinischen Landesregierung heraus- gegeben. Sie darf weder von Parteien noch von Personen, die Wahlwerbung oder Wahlhilfe betreiben, im Wahl- kampf zum Zwecke der Wahlwerbung verwendet werden. Auch ohne zeit- lichen Bezug zu einer bevorstehenden Wahl darf die Druckschrift nicht in einer Weise verwendet werden, die als Partei- nahme der Landesregierung zu Gunsten einzelner Gruppen verstanden werden könnte. Den Parteien ist es gestattet, die Druckschrift zur Unterrichtung ihrer eigenen Mitglieder zu verwenden.
    [Show full text]
  • Acla Agrophysica, 2002, 67, 15-23 ZOOGEOGRAPHICAL ANALYSIS
    Acla Agrophysica, 2002, 67, 15-23 ZOOGEOGRAPHICAL ANALYSIS OF THE BYELORUSSIAN POLESYE BEETLE FAUNA (INSECTA, COLEOPTERA) l 2 o.R. Aleksandrowicz , SA Kap/sil/h IDepartment of Ecology and Environmental Protection, Universily ofWarmia and Mazuria Żo łnierska str. J4, 10-561 , Olsztyn, Poland, [email protected] 2Maxim Tank Byelorussian Stale Pedagogieal University, Oepartment ofZoology Sovietskaya sIr. 18, 220050 Minsk, Byelonlss ia, sergey _1975 @mail,ru A b s t r a c t. UnIi I the present limes the Byeloru5sian Polesye therc arc 2 J 07 species belonging to 87 families one or which 219 species are can be found only herc. The bectle fauna oflhe Polesie is of a mixed origin, with the predominance ors pecies descending from the Ancient Mediterranean Di strict (65,4 %). The speci es from the East-European Sorcal District are less numerOlI S (33,2 %). The beetle fauna can be llsed to allocatc the Polesie as an independent zoogeographical region ofthe East European Province or the European-Ob $ubarea ar the European-Siberian Area ar the Pa­ laearctic Subkingdom ofthe Holarctic Kingdom . K e y w o r d s: Coleoptera, zoogeography , Byelorussi an Polesye INTRODUCTION The speeies diversity and the num ber of the speeimens made beetles the main group among animals. This group oeeupies all bioeenosis and takes part in the funetioning of water and ground eeosystems. Until the present times in the terri­ tory of the Byelorussian Polesye 2107 speeies belonging to 87 famili es out of whieh 2 19 speeies are found out only are known [I]. MATERlAL AND METHODS This researeh is an investigation of fauna (1975-2000 years), earried out in the territory of Byelorussia and the Bryansk distriet of Russia.
    [Show full text]
  • Arthropods in Linear Elements
    Arthropods in linear elements Occurrence, behaviour and conservation management Thesis committee Thesis supervisor: Prof. dr. Karlè V. Sýkora Professor of Ecological Construction and Management of Infrastructure Nature Conservation and Plant Ecology Group Wageningen University Thesis co‐supervisor: Dr. ir. André P. Schaffers Scientific researcher Nature Conservation and Plant Ecology Group Wageningen University Other members: Prof. dr. Dries Bonte Ghent University, Belgium Prof. dr. Hans Van Dyck Université catholique de Louvain, Belgium Prof. dr. Paul F.M. Opdam Wageningen University Prof. dr. Menno Schilthuizen University of Groningen This research was conducted under the auspices of SENSE (School for the Socio‐Economic and Natural Sciences of the Environment) Arthropods in linear elements Occurrence, behaviour and conservation management Jinze Noordijk Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of doctor at Wageningen University by the authority of the Rector Magnificus Prof. dr. M.J. Kropff, in the presence of the Thesis Committee appointed by the Doctorate Board to be defended in public on Tuesday 3 November 2009 at 1.30 PM in the Aula Noordijk J (2009) Arthropods in linear elements – occurrence, behaviour and conservation management Thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen NL with references, with summaries in English and Dutch ISBN 978‐90‐8585‐492‐0 C’est une prairie au petit jour, quelque part sur la Terre. Caché sous cette prairie s’étend un monde démesuré, grand comme une planète. Les herbes folles s’y transforment en jungles impénétrables, les cailloux deviennent montagnes et le plus modeste trou d’eau prend les dimensions d’un océan. Nuridsany C & Pérennou M 1996.
    [Show full text]
  • Magyarország Futrinkái Szél Gyõzõ, Retezár Imre, Bérces Sándor, Fülöp Dávid, Szabó Krisztián És Pénzes Zsolt
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Repository of the Academy's Library Magyarország futrinkái Szél Gyõzõ, Retezár Imre, Bérces Sándor, Fülöp Dávid, Szabó Krisztián és Pénzes Zsolt Bevezetés és történeti áttekintés taxonómiájával foglalkozó népes szakembergárdának el- térõ álláspontjuk kifejtésére. A nagy testû futrinkák (Carabus-fajok) méretük, feltûnõ Jelen munkánkban a Magyarországon élõ 28 Carabus- megjelenésük, nem utolsósorban pedig szépségük miatt faj, illetve 62 alfaj hazai elterjedését mutatjuk be. A fajok mindig is kitüntetett figyelemben részesültek. Viszonylag könnyebb azoníthatósága érdekében határozókulcsot is könnyen gyûjthetõk és azonosíthatók, ezért a legtöbb bo- mellékeltünk (5. fejezet). A kulcsban szereplõ anatómiai gárgyûjteményben helyet kapnak, elterjedésükrõl éppen képetek ismertetése a 2. fejezetben (alaktani áttekintés) ol- ezért aránylag sokat tudunk. Fajaik elõkelõ helyen szerepel- vasható, melyet kilenc ábra egészít ki. A határozást segíti nek a hazai és nemzetközi védett listákban, vörös könyvek- elõ a tárgyalt taxonok zömét bemutató 42 színes habitus- ben, de nem hiányoznak az Élõhelyvédelmi Irányelv fotó. További 12 színes kép a bogarak hímivarszervébõl (Habitat Directive) függelékeibõl sem. Gyakori alanyai az készült preparátumot (a hímvesszõt és a belsõ zsákot) áb- általános faunisztikai és monitoring vizsgálatoknak, ugyan- rázolja, azoknál a fajoknál, illetve alfajoknál, ahol ennek akkor elõszeretettel alkalmazzák õket közösségszerkezeti az azonosításban
    [Show full text]
  • Rôle Du Paysage Sur La Répartition Et L'abondance Des Pucerons Et De
    Rôle du paysage sur la répartition et l’abondance des pucerons et de leurs prédateurs carabiques Diab Al Hassan To cite this version: Diab Al Hassan. Rôle du paysage sur la répartition et l’abondance des pucerons et de leurs prédateurs carabiques. Biodiversité et Ecologie. Université Rennes 1, 2012. Français. tel-00794312 HAL Id: tel-00794312 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00794312 Submitted on 25 Feb 2013 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. ANNÉE 2012 THÈSE / UNIVERSITÉ DE RENNES 1 sous le sceau de l’Université Européenne de Bretagne pour le grade de DOCTEUR DE L’UNIVERSITÉ DE RENNES 1 Mention : Biologie Ecole doctorale Vie - Agro - Santé présentée par Diab AL HASSAN préparée à l‟unité de recherche (UMR 6553 ECOBIO) Écosystèmes, Biodiversité, Évolution UFR Sciences de la Vie et de l‟Environnement Rôle du paysage sur la Thèse soutenue à Rennes le 18 décembre 2012 répartition et devant le jury composé de : Joan VAN BAAREN l’abondance des PR Université de Rennes1 / examinateur Sandrine PETIT pucerons et de leurs DR INRA UMR BGA Dijon / rapporteur Jean-Pierre SARTHOU prédateurs carabiques MC ENSA Toulouse / rapporteur Mickaël HENRY CR INRA UMR 406 Avignon/ examinateur Alain BUTET CR CNRS / directeur de thèse Françoise BUREL DR CNRS / co-directeur de thèse REMERCIEMENTS Je voudrais tout d‟abord remercier les membres du jury d‟avoir accepté d‟évaluer mon travail: Sandrine Petit, Jean-Pierre Sarthou, Mickaël Henry et Joan van Baaren.
    [Show full text]