DOCSLIB.ORG

Water-Quality Assessment of the Ozark Plateaus Study Unit, Arkansas

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Water-Quality Assessment of the Ozark Plateaus Study Unit, Arkansas U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey WATER-QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF THE OZARK PLATEAUS STUDY UNIT, ARKANSAS, KANSAS, MISSOURI, AND OKLAHOMA--FISH COMMUNITIES IN STREAMS OF THE OZARK PLATEAUS AND THEIR RELATIONS TO SELECTED ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS By James C. Petersen Water-Resources Investigations Report 98-4155 National Water-Quality Assessment Program U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas J. Casadevall, Acting Director For additional information Copies of this report can be write to: purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey, WRD Branch of Information Services 401 Hardin Road Box 25286 Little Rock, Arkansas 72211 Denver Federal Center Denver, Colorado 80225 This information will help support the develop- FOREWORD ment and evaluation of management, regulatory, and The mission of the U.S. Geological Survey monitoring decisions by other Federal, State, and local (USGS) is to assess the quantity and quality of the earth agencies to protect, use, and enhance water resources. resources of the Nation and to provide information that The goals of the NAWQA Program are being will assist resource managers and policymakers at Fed- achieved through investigations of 60 of the Nation’s eral, State, and local levels in making sound decisions. most important river basins and aquifer systems, which Assessment of water-quality conditions and trends is an are referred to as study units. These study units are dis- important part of this overall mission. tributed throughout the Nation and cover a diversity of One of the greatest challenges faced by water- hydrogeologic settings. More than two-thirds of the resources scientists is acquiring reliable information that Nation’s freshwater use occurs within the 60 study units will guide the use and protection of the Nation’s water and more than two-thirds of the people served by public resources. That challenge is being addressed by Federal, water-supply systems live within their boundaries. State, interstate, and local water-resource agencies and National synthesis of data analysis, based on by many academic institutions. These organizations are aggregation of comparable information obtained from collecting water-quality data for a host of purposes that the study units, is a major component of the program. include: compliance with permits and water-supply stan- This effort focuses on selected water-quality topics using dards; development of remediation plans for a specific nationally consistent information. Comparative studies contamination problem; operational decisions on indus- will explain differences and similarities in observed trial, wastewater, or water-supply facilities; and research water-quality conditions among study areas and will on factors that affect water quality. An additional need identify changes and trends and their causes. The first for water-quality information is to provide a basis on topics addressed by the national synthesis are pesticides, which regional and national-level policy decisions can be nutrients, volatile organic compounds, and aquatic biol- based. Wise decisions must be based on sound informa- ogy. Discussions on these and other water-quality topics tion. As a society we need to know whether certain types will be published in periodic summaries of the quality of of water-quality problems are isolated or ubiquitous, the Nation’s ground and surface water as the information whether there are significant differences in conditions becomes available. among regions, whether the conditions are changing over time, and why these conditions change from place to This report is an element of the comprehensive place and over time. The information can be used to help body of information developed as part of the NAWQA determine the efficacy of existing water-quality policies Program. The program depends heavily on the advice, and to help analysts determine the need for and likely cooperation, and information from many Federal, State, consequences of new policies. interstate, Tribal, and local agencies and the public. The assistance and suggestions of all are greatly appreciated. To address these needs, the Congress appropriated funds in 1986 for the USGS to begin a pilot program in seven project areas to develop and refine the National Water-Quality Assessment (NAWQA) Program. In 1991, the USGS began full implementation of the program. The NAWQA Program builds upon an existing base of Robert M. Hirsch water-quality studies of the USGS, as well as those of Chief Hydrologist other Federal, State, and local agencies. The objectives of the NAWQA Program are to: •Describe current water-quality conditions for a large part of the Nation’s freshwater streams, riv- ers, and aquifers. •Describe how water quality is changing over time. •Improve understanding of the primary natural and human factors that affect water-quality conditions. Foreword III CONTENTS Abstract................................................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction .........................................................................................................................................................................1 Purpose and Scope.....................................................................................................................................................2 Acknowledgments .....................................................................................................................................................2 Description of Study Area ...................................................................................................................................................2 Field Methods......................................................................................................................................................................4 Statistical Methods ..............................................................................................................................................................6 Environmental Factors.........................................................................................................................................................6 Community Structure ........................................................................................................................................................10 Species and Taxa Richness ......................................................................................................................................11 Relative Abundance of Taxonomic Groups.............................................................................................................11 Stoneroller Abundance and Community Functions.................................................................................................17 Temporal and Spatial Variability .............................................................................................................................18 Results of Ordination Analysis..........................................................................................................................................18 Detrended Correspondence Analysis.......................................................................................................................18 Canonical Correspondence Analysis.......................................................................................................................22 Results of Classification Analysis .....................................................................................................................................24 Implications for Water-Quality Assessment......................................................................................................................24 Summary............................................................................................................................................................................28 Selected References...........................................................................................................................................................30 Appendix 1. List of scientific and common names of collected fish.................................................................................33 ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1. Map showing physiographic subdivisions of the Ozark Plateaus study unit and adjacent areas ....................................................................................................................................................3 2. Map showing location of sampling stations.......................................................................................................4 3. Graphs showing relative abundance of selected taxa at individual reaches.....................................................14 4. Detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) ordination plot of reach scores showing generalized correlation with environmental factors ........................................................................................20 5. Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) ordination plot of reach scores with selected environmental factors ......................................................................................................................................23 6. Diagram showing classification of fish communities by two-way
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ecological Integrity Assessment of Ozark Rivers
    ECOLOGICAL INTEGRITY ASSESSMENT OF OZARK RIVERS TO DETERMINE SUITABILITY FOR PROTECTIVE STATUS by Andrea Radwell Arkansas Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit U.S. Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division Department of Biological Sciences University of Arkansas Fayetteville, Arkansas 2000 COOP UNIT PUBLICATION NO. 36 ECOLOGICAL INTEGRITY ASSESSMENT OF OZARK RIVERS TO DETERMINE SUITABILITY FOR PROTECTIVE STATUS ECOLOGICAL INTEGRITY ASSESSMENT OF OZARK RIVERS TO DETERMINE SUITABILITY FOR PROTECTIVE STATUS A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science by Andrea Radwell, B.S., M.A. Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 1971, 1972 May 2000 University of Arkansas THESIS DUPLICATION RELEASE I hereby authorize the University of Arkansas Libraries to duplicate this thesis when needed for research and/or scholarship. Agreed _______________________________________ Refused ______________________________________ ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to thank the many people who have expressed their confidence in me, shared their expertise, and provided the encouragement and guidance needed to complete the research presented in this thesis. Without Dr. Tom Kwak’s initial confidence in my abilities to become a researcher, this project would never have been undertaken. He provided the important step in helping me develop my ideas for this project into a coherent, well-defined research agenda. He has always encouraged me to proceed, never doubting my ability to carry on. He has provided guidance from start to finish. I will always value both his friendship and his contribution to my growth as a graduate student and a researcher. Dr. Art Brown is deserving of acknowledgement for sharing his wealth of knowledge of stream ecology and his enthusiasm for studying and protecting the natural environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Species
    FEATURE: ENDANGERED SPECIES Conservation Status of Imperiled North American Freshwater and Diadromous Fishes ABSTRACT: This is the third compilation of imperiled (i.e., endangered, threatened, vulnerable) plus extinct freshwater and diadromous fishes of North America prepared by the American Fisheries Society’s Endangered Species Committee. Since the last revision in 1989, imperilment of inland fishes has increased substantially. This list includes 700 extant taxa representing 133 genera and 36 families, a 92% increase over the 364 listed in 1989. The increase reflects the addition of distinct populations, previously non-imperiled fishes, and recently described or discovered taxa. Approximately 39% of described fish species of the continent are imperiled. There are 230 vulnerable, 190 threatened, and 280 endangered extant taxa, and 61 taxa presumed extinct or extirpated from nature. Of those that were imperiled in 1989, most (89%) are the same or worse in conservation status; only 6% have improved in status, and 5% were delisted for various reasons. Habitat degradation and nonindigenous species are the main threats to at-risk fishes, many of which are restricted to small ranges. Documenting the diversity and status of rare fishes is a critical step in identifying and implementing appropriate actions necessary for their protection and management. Howard L. Jelks, Frank McCormick, Stephen J. Walsh, Joseph S. Nelson, Noel M. Burkhead, Steven P. Platania, Salvador Contreras-Balderas, Brady A. Porter, Edmundo Díaz-Pardo, Claude B. Renaud, Dean A. Hendrickson, Juan Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, John Lyons, Eric B. Taylor, and Nicholas E. Mandrak, Melvin L. Warren, Jr. Jelks, Walsh, and Burkhead are research McCormick is a biologist with the biologists with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Fish Report
    Aquatic Fish Report Acipenser fulvescens Lake St urgeon Class: Actinopterygii Order: Acipenseriformes Family: Acipenseridae Priority Score: 27 out of 100 Population Trend: Unknown Gobal Rank: G3G4 — Vulnerable (uncertain rank) State Rank: S2 — Imperiled in Arkansas Distribution Occurrence Records Ecoregions where the species occurs: Ozark Highlands Boston Mountains Ouachita Mountains Arkansas Valley South Central Plains Mississippi Alluvial Plain Mississippi Valley Loess Plains Acipenser fulvescens Lake Sturgeon 362 Aquatic Fish Report Ecobasins Mississippi River Alluvial Plain - Arkansas River Mississippi River Alluvial Plain - St. Francis River Mississippi River Alluvial Plain - White River Mississippi River Alluvial Plain (Lake Chicot) - Mississippi River Habitats Weight Natural Littoral: - Large Suitable Natural Pool: - Medium - Large Optimal Natural Shoal: - Medium - Large Obligate Problems Faced Threat: Biological alteration Source: Commercial harvest Threat: Biological alteration Source: Exotic species Threat: Biological alteration Source: Incidental take Threat: Habitat destruction Source: Channel alteration Threat: Hydrological alteration Source: Dam Data Gaps/Research Needs Continue to track incidental catches. Conservation Actions Importance Category Restore fish passage in dammed rivers. High Habitat Restoration/Improvement Restrict commercial harvest (Mississippi River High Population Management closed to harvest). Monitoring Strategies Monitor population distribution and abundance in large river faunal surveys in cooperation
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S
    Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 4—An Update April 2013 Prepared by: Pam L. Fuller, Amy J. Benson, and Matthew J. Cannister U.S. Geological Survey Southeast Ecological Science Center Gainesville, Florida Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Atlanta, Georgia Cover Photos: Silver Carp, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix – Auburn University Giant Applesnail, Pomacea maculata – David Knott Straightedge Crayfish, Procambarus hayi – U.S. Forest Service i Table of Contents Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................ v List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................ vi INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Overview of Region 4 Introductions Since 2000 ....................................................................................... 1 Format of Species Accounts ...................................................................................................................... 2 Explanation of Maps ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 3.4 Species Found in & Along the River
    3.4 Species Found In & Along the River Mammals There are many mammals found in our region that are highly dependent on the Kings River and its trib- utaries. Otter, muskrat, beaver, raccoon, white-tailed deer, mink, opossum, and squirrels are all seen regularly on the Kings River. Raccoon Procyon lotor Opossom Didelphis virginiana Mink Mustela vision Muskrat Ondatra zibethicus Steven Walling River Otter Lontra canadensis The Landowner’s Guide to Streamside Living 25 Is That Mammal a Nuisance or a Menace? Native to Arkansas, the beaver was completely Despite the use of the Razorback as a symbol for eradicated in the state by the early 1900s because Northwest Arkansas, the feral hog is a non-native of heavy trapping. Between 1926 and 1957, sev- species that is causing significant environmental enty seven beavers were restocked around the state problems in our area. Feral hogs are domesticated – leading to the rebounded population of today. swine that are released and then become “wild”. Feral hogs can wreak havoc on agricultural lands Beavers are pure vegetarians, subsisting solely on and natural habitats through their rooting and con- leaves, twigs, stems, and bark. These mammals sumption of a huge variety of food. These hogs build dams to create ponds and extend their zone eat almost anything and everything that comes of comfort. Beavers are very slow on land, and across their path. They can also spread disease to thus vulnerable to a variety of predators. Beaver both humans and domesticated animals. ponds and wetlands create habitat used by water- fowl, shorebirds, otters, fish, amphibians, and Feral hogs are very adaptive and thus very difficult aquatic plants.
    [Show full text]
  • GCP LCC Regional Hypotheses of Ecological Responses to Flow
    Gulf Coast Prairie Landscape Conservation Cooperative Regional Hypotheses of Ecological Responses to Flow Alteration Photo credit: Brandon Brown A report by the GCP LCC Flow-Ecology Hypotheses Committee Edited by: Mary Davis, Coordinator, Southern Aquatic Resources Partnership 3563 Hamstead Ct, Durham, North Carolina 27707, email: [email protected] and Shannon K. Brewer, U.S. Geological Survey Oklahoma Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, 007 Agriculture Hall, Stillwater, Oklahoma 74078 email: [email protected] Wildlife Management Institute Grant Number GCP LCC 2012-003 May 2014 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank the GCP LCC Flow-Ecology Hypotheses Committee members for their time and thoughtful input into the development and testing of the regional flow-ecology hypotheses. Shannon Brewer, Jacquelyn Duke, Kimberly Elkin, Nicole Farless, Timothy Grabowski, Kevin Mayes, Robert Mollenhauer, Trevor Starks, Kevin Stubbs, Andrew Taylor, and Caryn Vaughn authored the flow-ecology hypotheses presented in this report. Daniel Fenner, Thom Hardy, David Martinez, Robby Maxwell, Bryan Piazza, and Ryan Smith provided helpful reviews and improved the quality of the report. Funding for this work was provided by the Gulf Coastal Prairie Landscape Conservation Cooperative of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and administered by the Wildlife Management Institute (Grant Number GCP LCC 2012-003). Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Suggested Citation: Davis, M. M. and S. Brewer (eds.). 2014. Gulf Coast Prairie Landscape Conservation Cooperative Regional Hypotheses of Ecological Responses to Flow Alteration. A report by the GCP LCC Flow-Ecology Hypotheses Committee to the Southeast Aquatic Resources Partnership (SARP) for the GCP LCC Instream Flow Project.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis-1984-W576c.Pdf (7.715Mb)
    CHARACTERISTICS OF SMALLMOUTH BASS AND QZARK BASS POPULATIONS IN BUFFALO _NATIONAL JIVER, ARKANSAS By KEITH AVIS WHISENANT lt Bachelor of Science Baylor University Waco, Texas 1970 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE July, 1984 Q()( 1 I'\ ,() >s•{ " • t I toe_,, Cof. ~ CHARACTERISTICS OF SMALLMOUTH BASS AND OZARK BASS POPULATIONS IN BUFFALO NATIONAL ' RIVER, ARKANSAS Thesis Approved: ii PREFACE This study is concerned with the population characteristics of the two principal game fish species, smallmouth bass, Micropterus dolomieui, and Ozark bass, Ambloplites constellatus, inhabiting Buffalo National ( River. The primary objectives were to determine what effect habitat availability and/or various levels of recreational boating activity were having on these two species. I want to express my appreciation to my major advisor, Dr. O. Eugene Maughan, for his guidance, encouragement and assistance throughout this study. I also express appreciation to Dr. Anthony Echelle and Dr. Larry Talent for agreeing to serve on my committee on short notice and their assistance in preparation of this thesis. Special thanks is given to Dr. Milford R. Fletcher, Chief, Division of Natural Resource Management~ Southwest Region of the National Park Service, who established the program and provided the funding without which this study would not have been possible. Thanks are also given to Buffalo National River Superintendent Alec Gould and Chief Ranger Carl Hinrichs and their predecessors, Superintendent John Turney and Chief Ranger John Welch, who not only allowed me to take time from my regular duties to attend Oklahoma State University to accomplish this research but who also allowed other members of their staff to assist with data collection and analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Flow Alteration on Instream Habitat and Fish Assemblages
    THE INFLUENCE OF FLOW ALTERATION ON INSTREAM HABITAT AND FISH ASSEMBLAGES By NICOLE FARLESS Bachelor of Science in Agriculture Sciences and Natural Resources Oklahoma State University Stillwater, Oklahoma 2012 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE December, 2015 THE INFLUENCE OF FLOW ALTERATION ON INSTREAM HABITAT AND FISH ASSEMBLAGES Thesis Approved: Shannon Brewer Thesis Adviser Todd Halihan Jim Long ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There are many people that I need to acknowledge for their help and support throughout my Master’s research. I would like to start off thanking my advisor, Dr. Shannon Brewer. Shannon not only continually helped me broaden my knowledge of science and research but also invested her time to improve my practical knowledge as well. I would also like to thank my funding source, The Nature Conservancy and the Oklahoma Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit. I would also like to thank Brian Brewer for all of his help building and developing the thermal tolerance lab. Without him I could not have completed my temperature tolerance study. I am indebted to many graduate students that have assisted with statistical, theoretical, and field work. Especially, Jonathan Harris and Robert Mollenhauer, who have volunteered countless hours editing my writing and assisting with data analysis. I would also like to thank Dr. Jim Shaw, my undergraduate advisor, for recognizing my potential and encouraging me to attend graduate school. Without him I would have never considered furthering my education. I would not have been able to complete this project without the help of the many technicians that worked hard for me in the lab and in the field: Desiree Williams, Frances Marshall, Joshua Mouser, Bailey Johnson, Emily Gardner, Spencer Wood, Cooper Sherrill, and Jake Holliday.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulation No. 2 Regulation Establishing Water Quality
    PresentedbelowarewaterqualitystandardsthatareineffectforClean WaterActpurposes. EPAispostingthesestandardsasaconveniencetousersandhasmade areasonableefforttoassuretheiraccuracy.Additionally,EPAhasmade areasonableefforttoidentifypartsofthestandardsthatarenot approved,disapproved,orareotherwisenotineffectforCleanWater Actpurposes. October 21, 2020 Regulation No. 2: Regulation Establishing Water Quality Standards for Surface Waters of the State of Arkansas Effective June 4, 2020 The following provisions are in effect for Clean Water Act purposes with the exception of the provisions described below. Chapter 1: Authority, General Principles, and Coverage • Regulation 2.104 – Policy for Compliance o EPA took no action on the statement “…unless the permittee is completing site specific criteria development or is under a plan approved by the Department, in accordance with Regs. 2.306, 2.308, and the State of Arkansas Continuing Planning Process.” Under 40 C.F.R. § 131.21(c), new and revised standards do not go into effect for CWA purposes until approved by EPA. Therefore, the previously approved version (dated October 26, 2007) of this paragraph without this final sentence remains in effect for CWA purposes. Chapter 3: Waterbody Uses • Regulation 2.306 - Procedures for Removal of Any Designated Use Except Fishable/Swimmable, Extraordinary Resource Water, Ecologically Sensitive Waterbody, or Natural and Scenic Waterway, and Modification of Water Quality Criteria Not Related to These Uses o EPA took no action on the following revision to this
    [Show full text]
  • Predator-Prey Interactions Between Hellbenders
    PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTIONS BETWEEN HELLBENDERS (CRYPTOBRANCHUS ALLEGANIENSIS ALLEGANIENSIS AND C. A. BISHOPI) AND NATIVE AND NONNATIVE FISHES A Thesis Presented to The Graduate College of Missouri State University In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science, Biology By Brian G. Gall August 2008 PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTIONS BETWEEN HELLBENDERS (CRYPTOBRANCHUS ALLEGANIENSIS ALLEGANIENSIS AND C. A. BISHOPI) AND NATIVE AND NONNATIVE FISHES Department of Biology Missouri State University, August 2008 Masters of Science Brian G. Gall ABSTRACT The introduction of nonnative fishes often results in the local extinction of native amphibians due to a lack of evolutionary history and therefore, minimally-adapted antipredator behaviors toward the introduced fishes. Populations of hellbenders (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis) in Missouri have declined considerably since the 1980’s, coinciding with a rapid increase in trout introductions for recreational angling. I examined hellbender and fish predator-prey interactions by: (1) examining the foraging behavior of predatory fishes in response to a hellbender secretion; (2) comparing the number of secretion and control-soaked food pellets consumed by trout; and (3) comparing the response of larval hellbenders to chemical stimuli from introduced (trout) and native fish predators. Brown trout, walleye and large banded sculpin respond to hellbender secretions with increased activity while small banded sculpin responded by decreasing activity. In addition, brown trout ingested more hellbender secretion-soaked food pellets than control pellets, while rainbow trout expelled secretion-soaked food pellets. Finally, larval hellbenders exhibited weak fright behavior in response to chemical stimuli from nonnative trout relative to their responses to native predatory fish stimuli. These combinations of responses indicate that predation by nonnative fishes may be a plausible hypothesis for the decline of hellbender populations in Missouri.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution Changes of Small Fishes in Streams of Missouri from The
    Distribution Changes of Small Fishes in Streams of Missouri from the 1940s to the 1990s by MATTHEW R. WINSTON Missouri Department of Conservation, Columbia, MO 65201 February 2003 CONTENTS Page Abstract……………………………………………………………………………….. 8 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………… 10 Methods……………………………………………………………………………….. 17 The Data Used………………………………………………………………… 17 General Patterns in Species Change…………………………………………... 23 Conservation Status of Species……………………………………………….. 26 Results………………………………………………………………………………… 34 General Patterns in Species Change………………………………………….. 30 Conservation Status of Species……………………………………………….. 46 Discussion…………………………………………………………………………….. 63 General Patterns in Species Change………………………………………….. 53 Conservation Status of Species………………………………………………. 63 Acknowledgments……………………………………………………………………. 66 Literature Cited……………………………………………………………………….. 66 Appendix……………………………………………………………………………… 72 FIGURES 1. Distribution of samples by principal investigator…………………………. 20 2. Areas of greatest average decline…………………………………………. 33 3. Areas of greatest average expansion………………………………………. 34 4. The relationship between number of basins and ……………………….. 39 5. The distribution of for each reproductive group………………………... 40 2 6. The distribution of for each family……………………………………… 41 7. The distribution of for each trophic group……………...………………. 42 8. The distribution of for each faunal region………………………………. 43 9. The distribution of for each stream type………………………………… 44 10. The distribution of for each range edge…………………………………. 45 11. Modified
    [Show full text]
  • A Summary of Missouri Fishing Regulations 2019
    A SummarySummary of Missouri of Fishing Regulations MissouriEffective March 1, 2019 Fishing Regulations Effective March 1, 2019 DAVID STONNER DAVID DAVID STONNER DAVID Contents Sport Fishing in Missouri . .1 Permits: General Information . 2. Purchasing Permits . .3 Missouri Fishing Permits . .4 General Fishing Rules . 6. Game Fish . .8 Nongame Fish . 10 Live Bait . 12. Bullfrogs and Green Frogs . .14 Mussels and Clams . .14 Turtles . .14 Trout Fishing . .16 Reciprocal Fishing Privileges . 21 Illustrated Guide to the Fishes of Missouri . .22 How to Measure a Fish . .27 Special Area Regulations . .28 MO Fishing App . 4. 1 Fish Consumption Advisory . .42 Definitions . .44 Think You Have a Record? . .45 Contact Information . Back cover What’s New for 2019? ◾◾Lessees may no longer fish, hunt, or trap without a permit on the land that they lease . ◾◾Due to federal and state regulations, you are now required to provide a Social Security number to obtain fishing, hunting, and trapping permits . See Page 3 . Sport Fishing in Missouri When it comes to fishing, Missouri has a In Your Hands lot to offer . More than 200 species of fish The information in this live in the Show-Me State, and more than booklet is only a summary of four dozen species offer opportunities for the fishing rules and contains anglers . Seasons are long, and daily limits only those rules that affect are generous . Regulations exist to improve the ordinary sport angler . It and maintain the quality of fishing, ensure is NOT a legal document and that everyone has an equal chance of is subject to revision during catching fish, and protect aquatic resources .
    [Show full text]